Abstract
Psychological stress is one of the factors associated with human cardiovascular disease. Here, we demonstrate that acute perceived stress impairs the natural capacity of heart regeneration in zebrafish. Beside physical and chemical disturbances, intermittent crowding triggered an increase in cortisol secretion and blocked the replacement of fibrotic tissue with new myocardium. Pharmacological simulation of stress by pulse treatment with dexamethasone/adrenaline reproduced the regeneration failure, while inhibition of the stress response with anxiolytic drugs partially rescued the regenerative process. Impaired heart regeneration in stressed animals was associated with a reduced cardiomyocyte proliferation and with the downregulation of several genes, including igfbp1b, a modulator of IGF signalling. Notably, daily stress induced a decrease in Igf1r phosphorylation. As cardiomyocyte proliferation was decreased in response to IGF-1 receptor inhibition, we propose that the stress-induced cardiac regenerative failure is partially caused by the attenuation of IGF signalling. These findings indicate that the natural regenerative ability of the zebrafish heart is vulnerable to the systemic paracrine stress response.
Keywords: non-mammalian model, myocardium, infarction, crowding, cortisol, anxiolytic
1. Introduction
In most living organisms, the experience of multiple environmental and physiological challenges has driven the development of a vital stress response system. When facing a life-threatening situation, animals instinctively enter in a fight-or-flight mode to enhance the chances of their survival. In vertebrates, this innate reaction relies on the activation of the central nervous system orchestrating rapid and powerful systems to focus the energy resources on cognitive and muscular performance. Among these networks, the hypothalamus–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis and the sympathetic nervous system play a crucial role by, respectively, triggering the release of corticosteroids and adrenaline/noradrenaline, which are the primary stress hormones [1,2]. The neuro-endocrine stress response system is evolutionarily conserved between human and zebrafish [3–5]. The studies in fish demonstrated that cortisol and nor-/adrenaline promote multiple physiological changes, including an enhanced oxygen uptake from the gills and an increase in glucose uptake, in order to optimize task execution during environmental perturbations [3–5].
While the stress response is beneficial in the short term, a prolonged and frequent state of danger management becomes prejudicial for the organism. In certain conditions, the individual capacity to evaluate and cope with a stressful situation can be biased and the stress response becomes maladjusted. In such cases, the organism is maintained in a state of alertness with sustained activation of the sympathetic nervous system and elevation of glucocorticoid secretion. The resulting high level of stress hormones in the body disfavours different non-vital processes, such as digestion, growth, reproduction, immune defence or wound healing in fish and mammals [6–9]. Up to now, the molecular and cellular link between stress exposure and organ restoration has not been addressed.
The zebrafish provides a valuable mode of heart regeneration [10,11]. Lineage tracing experiments have demonstrated that the regenerated myocardium derives from proliferating pre-existing cardiomyocytes (CMs) [12,13]. Cardiac cells at the injury border reactivate developmental programmes, efficiently undergo mitosis and repopulate the injury zone, which only transiently heals by fibrotic tissue [12–14]. In addition to the local response at the site of injury, CM proliferation becomes globally increased within the entire myocardium without undergoing obvious dedifferentiation [11,14]. Cells of the epicardium, endocardium and vascularized fibrotic tissue have been shown to play a critical role in this regenerative response through paracrine signals, such as FGF, TGF-β, IGF and retinoic acid [15–18]. The importance of systemic factors has only recently been addressed, focusing on the role of cardiac innervation [19]. To our knowledge, the potential impact of environmental or psychological factors has not yet been assessed in this context. In this study, we aimed to determine if the efficient regenerative mechanism of the zebrafish heart could be challenged by stress stimuli, in particular by intermittent exposure to crowding.
Our work revealed that under stress, the robustness of heart regeneration in zebrafish is compromised, resulting in persisting fibrosis at the site of cryoinjury. We show that systemic stress hormones play a major role in this context, particularly by acting on CM proliferation via secondary downstream pathways, such as the IGF axis. The modulation of the stress response with anxiolytic drugs partially rescued the regenerative impairment in the stressed animals. For the first time, we integrate cardiac-exogenous components in the tight regulation of heart regeneration in zebrafish.
2. Results
2.1. Diverse stressors induce cortisol-mediated signalling in adult zebrafish
Like in humans, the stress level in zebrafish can be assessed by measuring the concentration of the primary stress hormone cortisol in the body fluids [3–5,20]. To test diverse stressing conditions of physical, chemical and psychological nature, we exposed the adult zebrafish to 1 h of heat shock (37°C; 10 fish l−1), 15 min of caffeine (100 mg l−1; 10 fish l−1) and 1 h of crowding (10 fish 250 ml−1). We found that a single stress exposure resulted in a 10- to 40-fold increase in the mean cortisol concentrations of stressed fish as compared to control fish (figure 1a,b). Interestingly, crowding robustly elevated the cortisol levels, suggesting a strong sensitivity of the zebrafish to a psychological stress, which is consistent with other aquatic biology studies [21]. We considered crowding as a particularly suitable experimental approach to study the effect of perceived stress on heart regeneration in zebrafish.
Cortisol is a natural lipophilic glucocorticoid hormone, which affects gene transcription mainly by modulating the nuclear glucocorticoid receptor (GCR) activity [22,23]. The GCR activity can be monitored in the transgenic fish Tg(9 × GCRE-HSV.Ul23:EGFP)ia20, referred to as GCRE::EGFP, which expresses fluorescent proteins under the control of transcriptional GCR-responsive elements [24]. This transgene is expressed in various body parts, including the ventricle, as shown in dissected whole heart and immunostained sections (figure 1c,d). The live-imaging of the same transgenic animals before and after daily crowding for 1 h during 7 days (d) revealed an upregulation of GCRE::EGFP expression in the whole body (figure 1e–g). A basic level of glucocorticoid signalling is essential for the regulation of a broad range of cellular responses during homeostasis [22]. Analysis of the GCRE-GFP expression in uninjured zebrafish heart allows detecting tissues or cells that are responsive to glucocorticoids. Although we observed inter-individual variability in the baseline activation of this pathway (intensity of GFP signals), the exposure to acute stress was sufficient to elevate the transcriptional activity of GCR signalling in the same animal.
2.2. Daily stress after cryoinjury blocks cardiac regeneration
To study the impact of repetitive acute stress on heart regeneration, we exposed fish to real and perceived stressors, namely heat shock and crowding, for 1 h d−1, during 30 days after ventricular cryoinjury (dpci). One month is sufficient to replace the transient fibrosis after cryoinjury and to regenerate the damaged organ in 80% of non-stressed animals, as visualized by AFOG (Aniline blue, acid Fuchsin, Orange-G) staining (figure 2a,i) [25]. In contrast with controls, the majority of stressed animals failed to efficiently regenerate the heart, as collagenous tissue was persisting in the injured area. Specifically, only 33% of animals regenerated the heart when exposed to daily crowding and only 25% after heat shock (figure 2c–i). These results demonstrate a detrimental impact of stress on heart regeneration.
Chronic stress is known to affect metabolism and feeding behaviour [26]. To uncouple a stressful experience from nutrition, the animals were fed twice daily approximately 2 h before and 6 h after stress exposure. In this regard, body weight measurement after cryoinjury and at 30 dpci revealed no impact of stress on body weight, indicating normal food intake (electronic supplementary material, figure S1Q). Interestingly, we observed that control animals showed enhanced blood glucose levels at the time of completion of heart regeneration at 30 dpci, while the stressed animal values remained similar to those at 7 dpci (electronic supplementary material, figure S1R).
To determine whether stress irreversibly blocks regeneration or delays its efficiency, we extended the duration of the regenerative process until 60 dpci. At this time point, a similar proportion of control animals achieved complete regeneration as compared to 30 dpci (figure 2i, electronic supplementary material, figure S1a and b). Animals that were stressed by crowding displayed an improved regenerative outcome at 60 dpci as compared to 30 dpci; however, they did not reach the efficient regeneration of the controls (figure 2i; electronic supplementary material, figure S1c–e). We concluded that psychological stress impairs regeneration mostly during the first four weeks, with a progressive attenuation of its effect in the long term. To test this hypothesis, we designed an experiment in which the animals were stressed for 30 days either by crowding or heat shock, followed by a recovery period in normal conditions for an additional 30 days. Interestingly, the regenerative outcome was similar between the groups exposed to crowding during 60 days or only during the initial 30 days followed by an additional month at normal conditions (figure 2i; electronic supplementary material, figure S1f–k). This indicates that the initial period of stress has a more potent effect on heart regeneration, and the prolonged stress progressively loses its detrimental impact, probably due to the habituation of the animals to regular averse stimuli.
The process of zebrafish heart regeneration after cryoinjury involves the initial phase of wound healing and cardiac blastema formation in the course of 14 days after injury, followed by the progressive replacement of fibrotic tissue with a new myocardium during the two subsequent weeks [14]. To determine which of these cellular events is more susceptible to stress, we performed an experiment with two groups of zebrafish stressed either during the first (1–14 dpci) or during the second phase (15–30 dpci) of cardiac regeneration. Our results demonstrated that daily exposure to crowding during the initial period impaired heart regeneration in 78% of animals, while stress exposure during the progressive phase did not cause any phenotype in comparison to controls (figure 2j; electronic supplementary material, figure S1l–p). This reveals a stronger repercussion of stress on the first phase of cardiac regeneration that is characterized by initiation of the regenerative programme.
The stimulation of the regenerative programme involves an activation of developmental genes in the myocardial zone adjacent to injury [11,27]. Accordingly, we analysed the expression of the embryonic cardiac myosin heavy chain (embCMHC) using monoclonal antibody N2.261 [14]. At 7 dpci, both control and stressed fish displayed a similar N2.261 immunoreactivity at the peri-injury zone of the myocardium (figure 3a,b,g). Thus, the regenerative failure of stressed animals is not associated with defective re-expression of embryo-specific sarcomeric proteins.
To identify the mechanisms responsible for the impaired regeneration after crowding, we analysed CM proliferation, which is an essential cardiac regenerative process [12,13,15,28]. We selected two cell cycle markers, MCM5 (minichromosome maintenance complex component 5; a protein of G1/S phase) and PH3 (phospho-Ser10-histone H3; a protein of mitotic, condensed chromosomes) [29], in the cmlc2::DsRed2-Nuc transgenic strain, in which the cardiac nuclei are labelled with DsRed (figure 3c–f). The quantification of MCM5-positive and DsRed-positive nuclei revealed a twofold reduction in the proportion of proliferating CMs in crowding conditions at 7 and 14 dpci (figure 3h,i). Importantly, quantification of PH3-positive nuclei demonstrated a decrease of mitotic events in cardiac cells of the stressed animals (figure 3e,f,j). We concluded that crowding globally suppresses cardiac proliferation within the entire myocardium, which might account for impaired heart regeneration.
In zebrafish, the mature adult CMs maintain their proliferative capacity during the ontogenic growth throughout the lifespan of the animal. To test whether stress impairs cardiac cell proliferation not only during regeneration but also during normal growth, we used the juvenile fish model system [30]. In our experiment, two month old animals were transferred from standard to low-density condition for 10 days to stimulate rapid growth, and twice daily were exposed to 1 h of crowding (electronic supplementary material, figure S2). After such a transfer, control animals contained an elevated number of MCM5-positive cardiac cells in comparison to animals at standard conditions. By contrast, acute exposure to crowding prevented stimulation of cardiac cell proliferation despite the maintenance for 22/24 h at low-density conditions (electronic supplementary material, figure S2a–c). Moreover, weight analysis of the animals revealed that daily exposure to stress suppresses the weight gain induced by the transfer to low-density conditions (electronic supplementary material, figure S2d). Thus, stress not only interferes with heart regeneration in adult fish but also affects the organismic and cardiac growth of the juvenile animal.
2.3. Deregulation of cortisol levels is the principal hormonal effector of the stress-induced regenerative impairment
As in humans, the stress response system in zebrafish is mainly driven by the activation of the hypothalamus–pituitary axis and the sympathetic nervous system leading to the production and release of cortisol and nor-/adrenaline [3,4]. To pharmacologically mimic the stress, we selected a synthetic glucocorticoid, dexamethasone (Dex), together with adrenaline for acute treatments (1 h d−1; figure 4a). To verify the pharmacological activity of Dex, we analysed its effect on the transcriptional activation of the glucocorticoid transgenic reporter GCRE::EGFP. Monitoring of the transgenic fish exposed to Dex during 7–9 days revealed an upregulation of GCRE::EGFP expression in the whole body (figure 4b,c). This result confirms that the exogenous Dex stimulates the systemic activation of the glucocorticoid-signalling pathway.
To test the effect of pharmacological stress on heart regeneration, fish were treated during 30 dpci with Dex (2 mg l−1, 1 h d−1), adrenaline (1 mg l−1, 1 h d−1), or a mixture of Dex and adrenaline. As the glucocorticoids are known to interfere with the immune and wound healing response, we started the treatment on day 7 after cryoinjury, to allow normal initial repair of the injured heart (figure 4a). To address the potential effect of this acute treatment on inflammation, we performed immunostaining against L-plastin, a leucocyte-specific actin-bundling protein, at 30 dpci [31]. This experiment revealed no significant impact on leucocyte recruitment (electronic supplementary material, figure S3a–c). The treatment with adrenaline did not affect heart regeneration at 30 dpci (figure 4d; electronic supplementary material, figure S3d–g). However, the daily 1 h treatment with Dex and Dex/adrenaline impaired regeneration in 50% and 62.5% of animals, respectively, which failed to complete the replacement of fibrotic tissue (figure 4d; electronic supplementary material, figure S3h–m).
To test the effect of glucocorticoids and adrenaline on CM proliferation, we performed drug treatments during 7 dpci. Quantification of MCM5-positive nuclei of CMs revealed that the administration of glucocorticoids elicited a significant reduction in CM proliferation, whereas adrenaline treatment did not have a significant effect (figure 4e; electronic supplementary material, figure S3n–p). Thus, enhanced glucocorticoid levels impair the proliferative capacity of adult zebrafish CMs.
To further characterize the response of cardiac cells to stress stimuli, we examined the expression level of several sarcomeric genes, such as ventricular myosin heavy chain (vmhc) and myosin p6, as well as a mammalian marker of cardiac overload, atrial natriuretic factor (ANF). Quantitative real-time PCR performed at 14 dpci revealed that the hearts exposed to perceived or pharmacological stress showed a significant increase in the expression level of these genes (figure 3k). Thus, the stress-induced decrease in CM proliferation is accompanied by a compensatory response of cardiac cells to increased haemodynamic load.
2.4. Treatment with non-selective β-blocker and serotonin-reuptake inhibitor partially rescued the stress-induced cardiac regenerative defect
Fine-tuned levels of glucocorticoids maintain the principal metabolic functions that are essential for life [22]. Therefore, it is expected that the complete suppression of glucocorticoid production or activity could lead to detrimental effects on the global health of the animals, which would not be appropriate in the study of psychological stress on cardiac regeneration. Indeed, we observed that an anti-glucocorticoid drug, mifepristone (RU-486), a synthetic steroid antagonist of a glucocorticoid receptor in target tissues [32,33], had toxic effects after exposure even at low concentration for 7 days (data not shown). We anticipated that a more specific approach for attenuation of stress without global side effects would be based on treatment with antidepressants and anxiolytics that have been approved for human therapy. Accordingly, to rescue cardiac regeneration in the stressed zebrafish, we selected several commonly known drugs, such as propranolol (β-blocker, a non-selective β-adrenoreceptor antagonist) [34,35], fluoxetine hydrochloride (Prozac®, a serotonin-reuptake inhibitor) and diazepam (Valium®, a benzodiazepine drug which enhances GABA neurotransmitter effect) (figure 4f). First, we validated the inhibitory effects of the selected drugs on the stress response in zebrafish using the cortisol assay (figure 4g). Then, we evaluated the potential capacity of these drugs to counteract the negative effect of stress on heart regeneration at 30 dpci (figure 4h). We found that the administration of diazepam did not rescue the stress-induced regenerative impairment (figure 4h; electronic supplementary material, figure S4e–g). However, propranolol and fluoxetine hydrochloride were beneficial for cardiac regeneration in the stressed fish (figure 4h; electronic supplementary material, figure S4h–l). Specifically, the exposure to propranolol nearly completely suppressed the detrimental effect of crowding, resulting in the regenerative outcome similar to control. After the treatment with fluoxetine hydrochloride, only 20% of fish displayed a severe lack of regeneration, as compared to 60% in the stressed animals. The different effects of diazepam, propranolol and fluoxetine hydrochloride could be explained by their distinct pharmacological actions. Indeed, diazepam, as opposed to propranolol and fluoxetine hydrochloride, enhances the inhibitory GABA activity and reduces the excitability of cells [36]. We concluded that anxiolytics might decrease the general alertness state of the fish, and consequentially favour heart regeneration in the crowding conditions (electronic supplementary material, figure S5).
2.5. Whole transcriptome analysis revealed significant alterations in gene expression in the stressed animals
Heart regeneration in zebrafish involves a tight communication between different cell types, which is mediated by secreted proteins. Accordingly, we analysed the expression of several cell-signalling proteins that are known to be upregulated in non-cardiac tissues of the regenerating hearts. Immunofluorescence analysis did not reveal effects of stress on the expression of retinal aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 (Raldh2, Aldh1a2), a retinoic acid-synthesizing enzyme that is induced in the epi/endocardium after cardiac injury [16] (electronic supplementary material, figure S6a,b). Similarly, we did not observe a difference in expression of fibronectin and tenascin C, which are extracellular matrix proteins of the transient fibrotic tissue (figure 3a,b; electronic supplementary material, figure S6c,d). To test whether apoptosis could account for the impaired connective tissue resorption, we performed TUNEL assay. We did not observe a significant change in the number of apoptotic cells (electronic supplementary material, figure S6e–g).
To identify genes by which the stress could influence cardiac regeneration after cryoinjury, we performed two independent whole transcriptome analyses at 14 dpci, a critical period where the transition between the transient scar formation and resorption is typically detectable. The first RNA-sequencing experiment (RNA-seq1) was done with the cryoinjured parts of the ventricles, whereas the second analysis was carried out with the whole ventricles (RNA-seq2) (electronic supplementary material, figure S7a–d). Although the principal component (PC) analysis (PCA) shows that two independent experiments (RNA-seq1 and RNA-seq2) can be distinguished in the function of PC1, the second dimension (PC2) demonstrates that we can discriminate between the stressed and control samples in both experiments (electronic supplementary material, figure S7e). This increases the robustness of our data as we could differentiate the stressed and control samples in two individual experiments. Each experiment was first analysed independently before combining both with DESeq2 [37]. The fusion of both analyses (fused RNA-seq1 and RNA-seq2) led to a list of 1576 differentially expressed (DE) genes with adj-p-value < 0.05.
The use of Pathway Studio® enabled us to make different gene enrichment analyses with the corresponding human orthologous genes. The most significant gene sets are listed in the electronic supplementary material, table S1 and S2. Of particular relevance were the changes observed in the gene cluster for the TGF-β signalling pathway, extracellular matrix turnover and in cell cycle regulation. Interestingly, we found that a large portion of the zebrafish genes, which were significantly changed between the stressed and control fish and did not have human orthologous genes, correspond to non-coding RNAs (electronic supplementary material, table S3). Further analysis of the implication of these molecular pathways in the stress-induced cardiac regenerative failure would be of particular interest.
In a second step, we compared the results of each individual experiment with those of the fused RNA-seq1 and RNA-seq2. This analysis highlighted three genes, which were significantly downregulated by stress exposure, namely ankrd9 (ankyrin repeat domain 9), nr4a1 (nuclear receptor subfamily 4, group A, member 1) and igfbp1b (insulin-like growth factor binding protein 1b). We localized the expression of these mRNAs in the zebrafish heart after cryoinjury by in situ hybridization: nr4a1 and ankrd9 were located in the layer of non-CMs surrounding the cryoinjured area (figure 5a–f), whereas igfbp1b was predominantly detected in the cryoinjured part of the ventricle, possibly in connective tissue cells and blood cells, although some expression was also scattered throughout the endocardium (figure 5g–i). The absence of expression of these factors in CMs (labelled by tropomyosin immunostaining) implies a non-cell-autonomous effect of stress on cardiac regeneration and highlights the interdependence between different tissues to promote heart restoration after injury.
2.6. Stress decreases the activity of IGF signalling in the regenerating heart
Igfbp1b belongs to the protein superfamily that comprises carriers of insulin-like growth factors (IGF) and modulators of IGF availability and activity [38]. As IGF signalling plays a major role during fin regeneration and recently has been shown to be required for CM proliferation during zebrafish heart development and regeneration [18,39], we sought to further investigate the potential link between stress and IGF signalling. By means of quantitative real-time PCR performed at 14 dpci, we confirmed that the igfbp1b gene is downregulated in the hearts of stressed and stress hormone-treated animals (figure 5j,k).
To visualize the IGF signalling activity in the control hearts, we used antibody against a phosphorylated form of insulin-like growth factor receptor 1 (phospho-Igf1r) (figure 6a). The activated Igf1r was detected in the cells associated with the endocardium of the transgenic fish tie2::EGFP (figure 6b). We did not observe any co-localization between phospho-Igf1r and the plasma membrane of CMs in the transgenic fish cmlc2::EGFP-PM (figure 6c). The similarity between the igfbp1b expression pattern (figure 5g–i) and phospho-Igf1r immunodetection supports a possible modulatory interplay between both molecules. Indeed, similarly to igfbp1b, the level of phospho-Igf1r was significantly reduced in the stressed animals as compared to controls (figure 6d–f).
To test whether the detrimental effect of stress is mediated through the downregulation of IGF signalling, we performed functional analysis of this signalling pathway after ventricular cryoinjury using NVP-ADW742, which was validated as a specific inhibitor of Igf1r kinase activity in the zebrafish fin [39]. At 7 dpci, treatment with 5 µM NVP-ADW742 markedly decreased phospho-Igf1r in the whole regenerating ventricle at 7 dpci, demonstrating the efficient inhibition of IGF signalling (figure 7a,b,e). Importantly, this phenotype was associated with decreased CM proliferation, suggesting a non-cell-autonomous effect of IGF signalling from the endocardium on CMs (figure 7c,d,f). Consistently, the inhibition of IGF signalling during 30 days after cryoinjury impaired regeneration (electronic supplementary material, figure S8). These results imply a potential causality link between the stress-mediated downregulation of igfbp1b expression, the reduction in IGF signalling and reduced CM proliferation resulting in impaired regeneration.
3. Discussion
The instinctive fight-or-flight reaction was originally developed to maximize the survival chance of an organism in life-threatening situations [6,7]. Our work demonstrates that real and perceived stress impairs the robust natural heart regeneration in zebrafish. This phenotype was associated with a reduced proliferative activity of CMs. Moreover, we found that repetitive stress exposure affects rapid cardiac growth in juvenile animals. Thus, the abnormal activation of the stress response appears to have global effects on the heart plasticity during adult regeneration and ontogenic growth. In the light of our results, particular attention has to be paid regarding the use of heat shock inducible zebrafish transgenic lines, which are frequently used in functional studies of heart regeneration.
To determine the molecular origin of these cellular effects, we performed two independent transcriptome analyses at 14 dpci, which commonly identified three differentially expressed genes: ankrd9, nr4a1 and igfbp1b. We verified that all these genes were expressed in non-CMs of the cryoinjured ventricle. The ankrd9 gene is poorly characterized in vertebrates, although its expression was decreased in a transcriptome analysis of chronic constant hypoxia in the zebrafish heart [40]. Nr4a1 (Nur77) belongs to the NR4A orphan nuclear receptors, which are hormone-sensitive transcription factors involved in the early response to pathological stimuli [41,42]. Interestingly, this receptor has already been implicated in mammalian liver regeneration [43,44] and is differentially regulated in the dorsal iris of the regenerating newt lens [45]. Thus, its potential role during heart regeneration has to be considered. Finally, Igfbp1b is known to act as a modulator of IGF signalling, and thus can influence different cellular processes such as proliferation or apoptosis [38,46].
Among the identified genes, we focused on igfbp1b. Igfbps are important modulators of IGF availability and can have either stimulatory or inhibitory function dependent on the tissue and cellular context [47,48]. Our results pointed to a similar expression pattern of igfbp1b and phospho-Igf1r. Moreover, daily exposure to stress significantly reduced both igfbp1b expression and the activity of Igf1r. Similarly, Nakano et al. [8] have shown that acute physiological stress is associated with the downregulation of growth factor genes, such as IGF-1, in salmon. We showed that CM proliferation was significantly decreased in the zebrafish treated with a specific pharmacological inhibitor of Igf1r, a finding that is reminiscent of the observations made by Huang et al. [18]. One of the Igf1r ligands, Igf2, has been shown to be an important epicardial cell-derived mitogen, which stimulates CM proliferation during cardiac development [49]. Thus, we propose that the downregulation of igfbp1b and the consequent deregulation of IGF signalling is a possible mechanism that decreases CM proliferation, and subsequently leads to cardiac regenerative failure in the stressed animals (figure 8). Further studies are required to assess the precise role of Igfbp1b and IGF signalling during cardiac regeneration and to determine whether the activation of IGF signalling would be sufficient to rescue the detrimental effects of stress in the heart.
Various studies have already validated the usefulness of the zebrafish as a model in the stress research field due to high functional and organizational similarities with the human's sympathetic adrenal and HPA axes [3,4]. In our study, the acute administration of glucocorticoid reproduced the negative effects of stress on ventricular regeneration and CM proliferation, implying a causal relationship between the stress-associated disturbances in glucocorticoid signalling and the cardiac regenerative failure. In human chronic stress, the deregulation of the neuro-endocrine pathways is known to disfavour multiple physiological processes and can result in cardiovascular disorders, such as cardiac hypertrophy [22,50–54]. Consistently, we found that different genes associated with cardiac response to increased haemodynamic load were upregulated in the stressed zebrafish. However, the correlation between glucocorticoid level or activity and regeneration might certainly be more complex than simply linear. In this regard, additional experiments from our laboratory (data not shown) revealed that blocking cortisol secretion (CP154526, antagonist of corticotropin releasing hormone receptor) or activity (RU-486, glucocorticoid receptor antagonist) significantly affects cardiac regeneration and produced similar phenotype to the administration of glucocorticoids. A certain fine-tuned level of the stress hormones is as essential for regenerative mechanisms as it is to maintain the animal viable and healthy. A better understanding of the decisive mechanisms that favour either the cardio-protective or cardio-toxic effects of glucocorticoids would be of particular relevance for the therapeutic use of corticosteroids as well as for regenerative medicine.
In humans, the pharmacological strategy for decreasing the stress response is based on anxiolytics, which mainly act on the central nervous system by reducing the arousal state [34,55]. We found that the administration of fluoxetine hydrochloride and propranolol in the stressed zebrafish after cryoinjury significantly rescued heart regeneration. Consistently, Mahmoud et al. [19] have shown that, in contrast to cholinergic transmission inhibitors, the administration of propranolol after ventricular resection does not affect CM proliferation at 7 days post-amputation. Thus, acting on the central/peripheral nervous system to reduce the global alertness of the organism might re-establish the tightly regulated hormonal equilibrium, which is probably required for cardiac regeneration. Hence, it seems that environmental or psychological perturbations have a significant impact on the well-regulated machinery needed for ventricular restoration in zebrafish. Elucidating the regenerative processes that are particularly vulnerable to stress might provide new strategic perspectives to improve heart repair after myocardial infarction in humans.
4. Material and methods
4.1. Animal procedures
Our study includes wild-type fish AB (Oregon), cmlc2::DsRed2-Nuc [56], (9 × GCRE-HSV.Ul23:EGFP)ia20 [24], cmlc2:eGFP-rass883 [57] referred to as cmlc2::EGFP-PM (plasma membrane) and tie2::EGFP [58] zebrafish strains. Adult animals were 10–18 months old at 26°C. Cryoinjuries were performed as described previously [59].
4.1.1. Assessment of cardiac regeneration
For the analysis of stress exposure or drug treatments on heart regeneration, the regenerative process was scored between 0 and 2.
Score 0: complete or almost complete cardiac regenerative process characterized by a replacement of the wound area with new myocardium and the absence of collagenous scar tissue.
Score 1: partial regeneration characterized by a new myocardium formation around the collagenous tissue of the postinfarcted area.
Score 2: blocked regeneration marked by the persistence of fibrotic tissue and lack of new muscle formation along the myocardial wall.
4.1.2. Pharmacological simulation of stress response
To mimic the effect of stress on heart regeneration, the zebrafish were treated with hydrocortisone (hydrocortisone 21-hemisuccinate sodium salt, Sigma, H2270, 1 mg l−1, diluted in system water, treatment changed every day), dexamethasone (Sigma, D1756, dissolved in DMSO at the 20 mg ml−1 stock concentration and added in fish water for a final concentration of 2 mg l−1, 1 h d−1) and/or adrenaline (adrenaline amino 1 mg, amino Ag, 1 mg l−1, 1 h d−1).
4.1.3. Pharmacological suppression of stress response
For the stress-rescue experiments, the following drugs were used: mifepristone (RU-486, Sigma, M8046, dissolved in DMSO at the 25 mg ml−1 stock concentration and added in fish water for a final concentration of 2.5 mg l−1, 1 h d−1), propranolol (Prop, Sigma, P0884, dissolved in ddH2O at the 10 mg ml−1 stock concentration and added in fish water for a final concentration of 1 mg l−1, 1 h d−1, 3 days pretreatment), fluoxetine hydrochloride (Flx. H., TOCRIS, 0927, dissolved in DMSO at the 1 mg ml−1 stock concentration and added in fish water for a final concentration of 0.1 mg l−1, continuous treatment, 2 weeks pretreatment) and diazepam (Dzp, Valium®, Roche (injection solution), 1 mg l−1, continuous treatment, 3 days pretreatment). In the case of continuous treatment, the drug was replaced every 3 days. For acute treatments, the zebrafish were treated with the corresponding drugs in the morning, before the stress exposure.
4.1.4. Pharmacological inhibition of IGF signalling
The Igf1r inhibitor NVP-ADW742 (Novartis Pharma AG) was dissolved in DMSO at 10 mM stock concentration and was added in fish water for a final concentration of 5 µM.
4.2. Histology, immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization
The hearts were collected and fixed overnight at 4°C in 2% paraformaldehyde. Then, they were rinsed in PBS and equilibrated in 30% sucrose before embedding in OCT and cryosectioning at a thickness of 16 µm. Aniline blue, acid Fuchsin, Orange-G (AFOG) staining, TUNEL assay, in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry were performed on heart sections as previously described [25]. To perform the different immunostaining shown in this study, the following primary antibodies were used: sheep anti-digoxigenin-fluorescein at 1 : 500 (Roche, 11 207 741 910), rabbit anti-glucocorticoid receptor at 1 : 200 (GeneTex, GTX101121), rabbit anti-DsRed (Clonetech, 632 496) at 1 : 200, rabbit anti-fibronectin at 1 : 400 (Sigma-Aldrich, F3648), chicken anti-L-plastin at 1 : 500 (kindly provided by P. Martin, Bristol), rabbit anti-MCM5 at 1 : 5000 (provided by Soojin Ryu), mouse anti-N2.261 (embCMHC, developed by H.M. Blau, obtained from Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank), mouse anti-p-histone 3 at 1 : 200 (Clone 3H10, Millipore), rabbit anti-phospho-Igf1r (Tyr 1161) at 1 : 50 (Santa Cruz), rabbit anti-Raldh2 at 1 : 400 (GeneTex, GTX124302), rabbit anti-tenascin C at 1 : 500 (USBiological, T2550-23), mouse anti-tropomyosin at 1 : 100 (developed by J. Jung-Chin Lin and obtained from Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, CH1). The secondary antibodies (diluted 1 : 500) were: goat anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor 488, goat anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 488 (Molecular Probes), goat anti-rabbit Cy3 or Cy5. DAPI was used at a 1 : 2000 dilution and phalloidin (F-actin labelling) at 1 : 500. For phospho-Igf1r immunofluorescence, a Tyramide Signal Amplification kit (TSA Plus Cyanine 5 System) was used after incubation with anti-rabbit IgG (light chain) horseradish peroxidase (Jackson ImmunoResearch, 1 : 500). After antibody staining, cardiac tissue imaging was performed at different 20× and 63×magnifications with confocal microscopes (Leica TCS-SP5 and Leica TCS-SPE-II). ImageJ software was used to perform the subsequent image analysis. To enhance the visibility of the blue fluorescent colour on the final figures, we modified the colour profile with Adobe Photoshop using CMYK conversion. In the figures, the heart sections are displayed with the injured zone oriented to the bottom of the image.
4.2.1. In situ hybridization
Several digoxigenin-labelled RNA antisense probes were generated by PCR amplification of specific cardiac cDNA sequences. The forward (F) and reverse (R) primers are listed in table 1. The reverse primers were synthesized with the addition of T3 polymerase.
Table 1.
gene | gene ID | forward primer (5′>3′) | reverse primer (5′>3′) | product (bp) |
---|---|---|---|---|
qRT-PCR | ||||
β-actin | ENSDARG00000037870 | TTGGCAATGAGAGGTTCAGG | TGGAGTTGAAGGTGGTCTCG | 55 |
vmhc | ENSDARG00000079564 | CCT GCG AAA GTC AGA TCG AG | CTG GCT CAT GAA GGA AGG TG | 214 |
myosin p6 | ENSDARG00000090637 | AAGAGCTGGCCAATGCAAAC | GGCACGCAGTTTATTCACTTG | 110 |
igfbp1b | ENSDARG00000038666 | TGT GGA GCA CCA CCC TAC TG | GGA TGG CGT TGA GTT GTG AC | 106 |
antisense probe for in situ hybridization | ||||
igfbp1b | ENSDARG00000038666 | GGAGCACCACCCTACTGAAG | TGTTGAGGTCTAGCGTGAGG | 804 |
igfbp1b | ENSDARG00000038666 | GTGTGTGTTGGATGCGTCTC | CAGTGTGTGAGCTCCTGTGG | 690 |
nr4a1 | ENSDARG00000000796 | GAGCTCCCTCTTCAGCTCAG | TTTGCATCCTTCACAAGTGC | 739 |
nr4a1 | ENSDARG00000000796 | TCCCTACCCAGCATCACTTC | ACAGCTTTGGGTTTGGATG | 849 |
ankrd9 | ENSDARG00000028804 | GGTGTTTCATTGGGAAGACG | GGCCTGATCGAGTCTGAAG | 722 |
vmhc | ENSDARG00000079564 | CTGCACTCCCAGAACACAAG | TCAACCAGATCTTGCAGACG | 461 |
After hybridization, the probes were detected by the use of anti-digoxigenin AP-conjugated antibody (Dig labelling system, Roche).
4.3. Measure of stress level
4.3.1. Cortisol extraction
Stress level in zebrafish was quantified by performing cortisol extractions as previously described [20]. Briefly, the zebrafish were frozen in liquid nitrogen immediately after the stress exposure. This procedure was performed in the morning as the secretion of cortisol follows a circadian rhythm. After euthanasia, each fish was weighed and cut into small pieces before homogenization in 500 µl of ice-cold PBS for 1 min. The rotor blade was washed in an additional volume of 500 µl PBS. The homogenates were transferred into glass tubes and the organic fraction containing cortisol was extracted from the rest by the addition of 5 ml diethyl ether, vortexing and centrifugation at 7000g for 10 min. The organic layer containing cortisol (top yellowish layer) was transferred to a fresh glass tube. The extraction procedure was repeated three times. To allow ether evaporation, the collected cortisol samples were maintained overnight under the hood before reconstitution in 1 ml 1× PBS. The quantification of cortisol level in each sample was performed with the use of a salivary cortisol enzyme immunoassay kit (Salimetrics, 1-3102-5) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The cortisol concentrations were normalized based on the body weight of the zebrafish and described as ng g−1 body weight.
4.3.2. Monitoring of Tg(9 × GCRE-HSV.Ul23:EGFP)ia20 transgenic zebrafish
The GCR activity was monitored in transgenic fish Tg(9 × GCRE-HSV.Ul23:EGFP)ia20, referred to as GCRE::EGFP. For each analysis, the same fish was imaged on three successive days before and after the period of stress at 6, 7 and 8 days of acute crowding. The pictures were always taken at the same time of the day to cope with circadian changes in GCR activity. The quantification of the GFP signal was performed after the conversion of the image into a grey scale using ImageJ software.
4.4. Glucose measurements
Glucose measurements were performed as previously described [60]. Briefly, fish were anaesthetized and euthanized in ice-cold facility water. An incision was performed between the anal fin and the caudal fin to induce bleeding [61]. Blood glucose levels were determined by using the FreeStyle Freedom Lite, 0.3 µl sample (Abbott) glucose meter and test strips.
4.5. RNA-seq analysis
Two whole transcriptome analyses were performed. For the first analysis (RNA-seq1), 1 × 15 cryoinjured parts were used for the control and stress groups. The use of cmlc2:eGFP-rass883 (referred to as cmlc2::EGFP-PM) transgenic zebrafish, expressing GFP in the plasma membrane of CMs, enabled us to identify and isolate the cryoinjured parts of the ventricle. The second analysis was performed with 2 × 10 whole ventricles per group (RNA-seq2). After homogenization with a Tissue Lyser LT, the samples were transferred in MaXtract High Density tubes (Qiagen, cat.no 129056) before the addition of GenElute-LPA (Sigma, cat.no 56575), a synthetic polymer, which acts as a carrier for DNA/RNA. RNA was then isolated according to the Trizol reagent manual (Life Technologies, cat. no. 15596-026) and purified according to the RNeasy MinElute Cleanup Kit manual (Qiagen, cat. no 74004).
RNA libraries were prepared according to the TruSeq RNA Sample Preparation v2 Guide (Illumina) and 100 bp single-ends RNA sequencing was performed with an Illumina HiSeq2500 machine. The RNA-seq libraries consisted of 48 mio–67 mio reads for the first analysis (RNA-seq1) and of 2.4 mio–3.5 mio reads of 100 bp in length for the second analysis (RNA-seq2). Reads were first checked for sequence quality (FastQC, www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc). The last 20 bp of the libraries were trimmed due to bad quality. The libraries were then mapped to the zebrafish genome (v. 9) using the spliced mapping approach implemented in TopHat2 [62]. For each gene (annotation version 9.75) the number of reads mapping to it were counted using the program HTSeq-count (www.w-huber.embl.de/users/anders/HTSeq v. 0.5.4p3). To test for significant differences of the expression levels between treatments the R-package DESeq [63] was used. p-Values were corrected for multiple testing following Benjamini & Hochberg [64].
4.5.1. RNA-seq analysis
Two RNA-seq experiments (RNA-seq1 (one replicate, 15 cryoinjured parts per group) and RNA-seq2 (two replicates, 10 cryoinjured ventricles per group) were analysed using classical pipelines: QC with Fastqc (http://www.bioinformatics.bbsrc.ac.uk/projects/fastqc), mapping with TopHat2 [62], counting with HTSeq-count [65] and statistical analysis with DESeq1 [63]. Both analyses led to DE gene lists (28 for RNA-seq1, 115 for RNA-seq2 and with adj-p-value < 0.05).
As DESeq1 is very conservative, we reanalysed both experiments together (as we would have triplicates) with DESeq2 [37]. This analysis (fused RNA-seq1 and RNA-seq2) led to a list of 1576 DE genes with adj-p-value < 0.05. Although the PCA shows that the two experiments (RNA-seq1 and RNA-seq2) could be easily distinguished (PC1), the second dimension (PC2) allowed us to discriminate between the stressed versus control samples in both experiments.
4.5.2. Pathway analysis
We performed a pathway analysis with Pathway Studio (Pathway Studio v. 9.0, Aridane Genomics, Rockville, MD, USA). Using this tool, we were able to highlight several pathways and regulatory networks potentially involved in cardiac regeneration.
4.6. Quantitative real-time PCR
RNA was extracted according to the Trizol reagent manual (Life Technologies) with the use of MaXtract High Density tubes. cDNA was synthesized with the Super-Script-II Reverse-Transcriptase (Invitrogen) using 1.5 µg of RNA. The primers used for different amplifications are listed in table 1.
4.7. Statistical analysis
All results are expressed as the mean ± s.e.m.. Statistical analyses have been performed with GraphPad Prism.
Supplementary Material
Supplementary Material
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
We thank V. Zimmermann for excellent technical assistance and for fish care, F. Chablais and C. Pfefferli for the specimens and P. Aeby for critical reading of the manuscript. We are grateful to F. Hofmann, Novartis Pharma for providing NVP-ADW742 compounds. We thank L. Falquet, S. Neuenschwander and R. Bruggmann for the RNA-seq analysis.
Competing interests
The authors declare no financial or non-financial competing interests.
Funding
This work was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation, grant numbers 310030_159995 and CRSII3_147675, and Schweizerische Stiftung für die Erforschung der Muskelkrankheiten.
References
- 1.O'connor TM, O'Halloran DJ, Shanahan F. 2000. The stress response and the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis: from molecule to melancholia. QJM 93, 323–333. (doi:10.1093/Qjmed/93.6.323) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Charmandari E, Tsigos C, Chrousos G. 2005. Endocrinology of the stress response. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 67, 259–284. (doi:10.1146/annurev.physiol.67.040403.120816) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Steenbergen PJ, Richardson MK, Champagne DL. 2011. The use of the zebrafish model in stress research. Prog Neuro-Psychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 35, 1432–1451. (doi:10.1016/J.Pnpbp.2010.10.010) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bonga SEW. 1997. The stress response in fish. Physiol. Rev. 77, 591–625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Lohr H, Hammerschmidt M. 2011. Zebrafish in endocrine systems: recent advances and implications for human disease. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 73, 183–211. (doi:10.1146/annurev-physiol-012110-142320) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.de Kloet ER, Joels M, Holsboer F. 2005. Stress and the brain: from adaptation to disease. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 6, 463–475. (doi:10.1038/nrn1683) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Chrousos GP. 2009. Stress and disorders of the stress system. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 5, 374–381. (doi:10.1038/nrendo.2009.106) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Nakano T, Afonso LO, Beckman BR, Iwama GK, Devlin RH. 2013. Acute physiological stress down-regulates mRNA expressions of growth-related genes in coho salmon. PLoS ONE 8, e71421 (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0071421) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Barton BA. 2002. Stress in fishes: A diversity of responses with particular reference to changes in circulating corticosteroids. Integr. Comp. Biol. 42, 517–525. (doi:10.1093/Icb/42.3.517) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kikuchi K. 2014. Advances in understanding the mechanism of zebrafish heart regeneration. Stem Cell Res. 13, 542–555. (doi:10.1016/j.scr.2014.07.003) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Jazwinska A, Sallin P. 2016. Regeneration versus scarring in vertebrate appendages and heart. J. Pathol. 238, 233–246. (doi:10.1002/path.4644) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kikuchi K, et al. 2010. Primary contribution to zebrafish heart regeneration by gata4+ cardiomyocytes. Nature 464, 601–605. (doi:10.1038/nature08804) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Jopling C, Sleep E, Raya M, Marti M, Raya A, Izpisua Belmonte JC. 2010. Zebrafish heart regeneration occurs by cardiomyocyte dedifferentiation and proliferation. Nature 464, 606–609. (doi:10.1038/nature08899) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sallin P, de Preux Charles AS, Duruz V, Pfefferli C, Jazwinska A. 2015. A dual epimorphic and compensatory mode of heart regeneration in zebrafish. Dev. Biol. 399, 27–40. (doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2014.12.002) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Lepilina A, Coon AN, Kikuchi K, Holdway JE, Roberts RW, Burns CG, Poss KD. 2006. A dynamic epicardial injury response supports progenitor cell activity during zebrafish heart regeneration. Cell 127, 607–619. (doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.08.052) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kikuchi K, Holdway JE, Major RJ, Blum N, Dahn RD, Begemann G, Poss KD. 2011. Retinoic acid production by endocardium and epicardium is an injury response essential for zebrafish heart regeneration. Dev. Cell. 20, 397–404. (doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2011.01.010) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Chablais F, Jazwinska A. 2012. The regenerative capacity of the zebrafish heart is dependent on TGFbeta signaling. Development 139, 1921–1930. (doi:10.1242/dev.078543) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Huang Y, Harrison MR, Osorio A, Kim J, Baugh A, Duan CM, Sucov HM, Lien CL. 2013. Igf signaling is required for cardiomyocyte proliferation during zebrafish heart development and regeneration. PLoS ONE 8, e67266. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0067266) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Mahmoud AI, et al. . 2015. Nerves regulate cardiomyocyte proliferation and heart regeneration. Dev. Cell 34, 387–399. (doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2015.06.017) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Cachat J, et al. . 2010. Measuring behavioral and endocrine responses to novelty stress in adult zebrafish. Nat. Protoc. 5, 1786–1799. (doi:10.1038/nprot.2010.140) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ramsay JM, Feist GW, Varga ZM, Westerfield M, Kent ML, Schreck CB. 2006. Whole-body cortisol is an indicator of crowding stress in adult zebrafish, Danio rerio. Aquaculture 258, 565–574. (doi:10.1016/J.Aquaculture.2006.04.020) [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kadmiel M, Cidlowski JA. 2013. Glucocorticoid receptor signaling in health and disease. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 34, 518–530. (doi:10.1016/j.tips.2013.07.003) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Czock D, Keller F, Rasche FM, Haussler U. 2005. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of systemically administered glucocorticoids. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 44, 61–98. (doi:10.2165/00003088-200544010-00003) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Benato F, Colletti E, Skobo T, Moro E, Colombo L, Argenton F, Dalla Valle L. 2014. A living biosensor model to dynamically trace glucocorticoid transcriptional activity during development and adult life in zebrafish. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 392, 60–72. (doi:10.1016/j.mce.2014.04.015) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Chablais F, Veit J, Rainer G, Jazwinska A. 2011. The zebrafish heart regenerates after cryoinjury-induced myocardial infarction. BMC Dev. Biol. 11, 21 (doi:10.1186/1471-213X-11-21) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Bazhan N, Zelena D. 2013. Food-intake regulation during stress by the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis. Brain Res. Bull. 95, 46–53. (doi:10.1016/j.brainresbull.2013.04.002) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Gupta V, Gemberling M, Karra R, Rosenfeld GE, Evans T, Poss KD. 2013. An injury-responsive gata4 program shapes the zebrafish cardiac ventricle. Curr. Biol. 23, 1221–1227. (doi:10.1016/j.cub.2013.05.028) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Jopling C, Boue S, Izpisua Belmonte JC. 2011. Dedifferentiation, transdifferentiation and reprogramming: three routes to regeneration. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 12, 79–89. (doi:10.1038/nrm3043) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Hans F, Dimitrov S. 2001. Histone H3 phosphorylation and cell division. Oncogene 20, 3021–3027. (doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1204326) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Wills AA, Holdway JE, Major RJ, Poss KD. 2008. Regulated addition of new myocardial and epicardial cells fosters homeostatic cardiac growth and maintenance in adult zebrafish. Development 135, 183–192. (doi:10.1242/dev.010363) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Morley SC. 2012. The actin-bundling protein L-plastin: a critical regulator of immune cell function. Int. J. Cell Biol. 2012, 935173 (doi:10.1155/2012/935173) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Sarkar NN. 2002. Mifepristone: bioavailability, pharmacokinetics and use-effectiveness. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 101, 113–120. (doi:10.1016/S0301-2115(01)00522-X) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Fleseriu M, Biller BM, Findling JW, Molitch ME, Schteingart DE, Gross C, Seismic Study Investigators. 2012. Mifepristone, a glucocorticoid receptor antagonist, produces clinical and metabolic benefits in patients with Cushing's syndrome. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 97, 2039–2049. (doi:10.1210/jc.2011-3350) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Peet M. 1988. The treatment of anxiety with beta-blocking drugs. Postgrad. Med. J. 64(Suppl 2), 45–49. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Granville-Grossman KL, Turner P. 1966. The effect of propranolol on anxiety. Lancet 1, 788–790. (doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(66)91863-0) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Griffin CE III, Kaye AM, Bueno FR, Kaye AD. 2013. Benzodiazepine pharmacology and central nervous system-mediated effects. Ochsner J. 13, 214–223. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. 2014. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15, 550 (doi:10.1186/PREACCEPT-8897612761307401) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Hwa V, Oh Y, Rosenfeld RG. 1999. The insulin-like growth factor-binding protein (IGFBP) superfamily. Endocr. Rev. 20, 761–787. (doi:10.1210/edrv.20.6.0382) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Chablais F, Jazwinska A. 2010. IGF signaling between blastema and wound epidermis is required for fin regeneration. Development 137, 871–879. (doi:10.1242/dev.043885) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Marques IJ, Leito JT, Spaink HP, Testerink J, Jaspers RT, Witte F, van den Berg S, Bagowski CP. 2008. Transcriptome analysis of the response to chronic constant hypoxia in zebrafish hearts. J. Comp. Physiol. B 178, 77–92. (doi:10.1007/s00360-007-0201-4) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Maxwell MA, Muscat GE. 2006. The NR4A subgroup: immediate early response genes with pleiotropic physiological roles. Nucl. Recept. Signal. 4, e002 (doi:10.1621/nrs.04002) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Wang Z, Benoit G, Liu J, Prasad S, Aarnisalo P, Liu X, Xu H, Walker NP, Perlmann T. 2003. Structure and function of Nurr1 identifies a class of ligand-independent nuclear receptors. Nature 423, 555–560. (doi:10.1038/nature01645) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Scearce LM, Laz TM, Hazel TG, Lau LF, Taub R. 1993. RNR-1, a nuclear receptor in the NGFI-B/Nur77 family that is rapidly induced in regenerating liver. J. Biol. Chem. 268, 8855–8861. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Hu Y, Zhan Q, Liu HX, Chau T, Li Y, Yvonne Wan YJ. 2014. Accelerated partial hepatectomy-induced liver cell proliferation is associated with liver injury in Nur77 knockout mice. Am. J. Pathol. 184, 3272–3283. (doi:10.1016/j.ajpath.2014.08.002) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Sousounis K, Looso M, Maki N, Ivester CJ, Braun T, Tsonis PA. 2013. Transcriptome analysis of newt lens regeneration reveals distinct gradients in gene expression patterns. PLoS ONE 8, e61445 (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0061445) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Rosenfeld RG, et al. 1999. The insulin-like growth factor binding protein superfamily: new perspectives. Pediatrics 104, 1018–1020. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Duan C, Xu Q. 2005. Roles of insulin-like growth factor (IGF) binding proteins in regulating IGF actions. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 142, 44–52. (doi:10.1016/j.ygcen.2004.12.022) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Mohan S, Baylink DJ. 2002. IGF-binding proteins are multifunctional and act via IGF-dependent and -independent mechanisms. J. Endocrinol. 175, 19–31. (doi:10.1677/joe.0.1750019) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Li P, Cavallero S, Gu Y, Chen TH, Hughes J, Hassan AB, Bruning JC, Pashmforoush M, Sucov HM. 2011. IGF signaling directs ventricular cardiomyocyte proliferation during embryonic heart development. Development 138, 1795–1805. (doi:10.1242/dev.054338) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Godbout JP, Glaser R. 2006. Stress-induced immune dysregulation: implications for wound healing, infectious disease and cancer. J. Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 1, 421–427. (doi:10.1007/S11481-006-9036-0) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Kiecolt-Glaser JK, Marucha PT, Malarkey WB, Mercado AM, Glaser R. 1995. Slowing of wound healing by psychological stress. Lancet 346, 1194–1196. (doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(95)92899-5) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Ren RQ, Oakley RH, Cruz-Topete D, Cidlowski JA. 2012. Dual role for glucocorticoids in cardiomyocyte hypertrophy and apoptosis. Endocrinology 153, 5346–5360. (doi:10.1210/En.2012-1563) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.De P, Roy SG, Kar D, Bandyopadhyay A. 2011. Excess of glucocorticoid induces myocardial remodeling and alteration of calcium signaling in cardiomyocytes. J. Endocrinol. 209, 105–114. (doi:10.1530/JOE-10-0431) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Girod JP, Brotman DJ. 2004. Does altered glucocorticoid homeostasis increase cardiovascular risk? Cardiovasc. Res. 64, 217–226. (doi:10.1016/J.Cardiores.2004.07.006) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Griebel G, Holmes A. 2013. 50 years of hurdles and hope in anxiolytic drug discovery. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 12, 667–687. (doi:10.1038/nrd4075) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Rottbauer W et al. . 2002. Reptin and pontin antagonistically regulate heart growth in zebrafish embryos. Cell 111, 661–672. (doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(02)01112-1) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Chi NC, et al. 2008. Genetic and physiologic dissection of the vertebrate cardiac conduction system. PLoS Biol. 6, e109 (doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0060109) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Motoike T, et al. . 2000. Universal GFP reporter for the study of vascular development. Genesis 28, 75–81. (doi:10.1002/1526-968X(200010)28:2<75::AID-GENE50>3.0.CO;2-S) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Chablais F, Jazwinska A. 2012. Induction of myocardial infarction in adult zebrafish using cryoinjury. J. Vis. Exp. 62, e3666 (doi:10.3791/3666) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Eames SC, Philipson LH, Prince VE, Kinkel MD. 2010. Blood sugar measurement in zebrafish reveals dynamics of glucose homeostasis. Zebrafish 7, 205–213. (doi:10.1089/zeb.2009.0640) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Pedroso GL, Hammes TO, Escobar TD, Fracasso LB, Forgiarini LF, da Silveira TR. 2012. Blood collection for biochemical analysis in adult zebrafish. J. Vis. Exp. 63, e3865 (doi:10.3791/3865) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Kim D, Pertea G, Trapnell C, Pimentel H, Kelley R, Salzberg SL. 2013. TopHat2: accurate alignment of transcriptomes in the presence of insertions, deletions and gene fusions. Genome Biol. 14, R36 (doi:10.1186/Gb-2013-14-4-R36) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Anders S, Huber W. 2010. Differential expression analysis for sequence count data. Genome Biol. 11, R106 (doi:10.1186/Gb-2010-11-10-R106) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. 1995. Controlling the false discovery rate—a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. B Met. 57, 289–300. [Google Scholar]
- 65.Anders S, Pyl PT, Huber W. 2015. HTSeq: a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics 31, 166–169. (doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu638) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.