Skip to main content
PMC home page
British Heart Journal logoLink to British Heart Journal
. 1980 Nov;44(5):499–502. doi: 10.1136/hrt.44.5.499

Antibiotic prophylaxis against infective endocarditis after normal delivery--is it necessary?

D Sugrue, S Blake, P Troy, D MacDonald
PMCID: PMC482434  PMID: 7437187

Abstract

During the years 1959 to 1978 inclusive 2165 women with rheumatic or congenital heart disease had vaginal deliveries at three large Dublin maternity hospitals. There were two (0.09%) cases of puerperal infective endocarditis, neither of which was unequivocally related to preceding childbirth during this period. Routine peripartum antibiotic prophylaxis was not given to either. A questionnaire of the practice of 19 obstetricians in Ireland showed that 12 (63%) gave antibiotics routinely during labour and after delivery in cardiac patients, five (26%) did not, and two (11%) used them occasionally. Peripheral vein blood was drawn serially from 0 to 30 minutes after vaginal delivery to determine the incidence of asymptomatic puerperal bacteraemia. A total of 299 cultures was obtained from 83 normal women and single blood cultures were positive in three women (3.6% of patients, 1.0% of cultures). A review of the published reports showed that well-documented cases of infective endocarditis and of asymptomatic puerperal bacteraemia after normal vaginal delivery are uncommon. There is evidence that antibiotic prophylaxis may increase the risk of developing antibiotic-resistant endocarditis. Recommended prophylactic regimens carry a considerable risk of drug toxicity. These facts, coupled with a lack of direct evidence in support of the efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis, suggest that routine peripartum antibiotic prophylaxis is not indicated.

Full text

PDF
502

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baker T. H., Hubbell R. Reappraisal of asymptomatic puerperal bacteremia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1967 Feb 15;97(4):575–576. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(67)90575-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baker T. H., Machikawa J. H., Stapleton J. J. Asymptomatic puerperal bacteremia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1966 Apr 1;94(7):903–905. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(66)90023-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cobbs C. G. IUD and endocarditis. Ann Intern Med. 1973 Mar;78(3):451–451. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-78-3-451_1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. DORMER A. E. Bacterial endocarditis: survey of patients treated between 1945 and 1956. Br Med J. 1958 Jan 11;1(5062):63–69. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.5062.63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. GARROD L. P., WATERWORTH P. M. The risks of dental extraction during penicillin treatment. Br Heart J. 1962 Jan;24:39–46. doi: 10.1136/hrt.24.1.39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. HOOK E. W., KAYE D. Prophylaxis of bacterial endocarditis. J Chronic Dis. 1962 Jun;15:635–646. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(62)90033-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. KOENIG M. G., KAYE D. Enterococcal endocarditis. Report of nineteen cases with long-term follow-up data. N Engl J Med. 1961 Feb 9;264:257–264. doi: 10.1056/NEJM196102092640601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. LEIN J. N., STANDER R. W. Subacute bacterial endocarditis following obstetric and gynecologic procedures; report of eight cases. Obstet Gynecol. 1959 May;13(5):568–573. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Mandell G. L., Kaye D., Levison M. E., Hook E. W. Enterococcal endocarditis. An analysis of 38 patients observed at the New York Hospital-Cornell Medical Center. Arch Intern Med. 1970 Feb;125(2):258–264. doi: 10.1001/archinte.125.2.258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. PRAZIC M., SALAJ B., SUBOTIC R. FAMILIAL SENSITIVITY TO STREPTOMYCIN. J Laryngol Otol. 1964 Nov;78:1037–1043. doi: 10.1017/s0022215100063131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Polk B. F., Schoenbaum S. C. Prophylactic antibiotics in obstetrics. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1979 Jun;22(2):379–384. doi: 10.1097/00003081-197906000-00015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. RABINOVICH S., EVANS J., SMITH I. M., JANUARY L. E. A LONG-TERM VIEW OF BACTERIAL ENDOCARDITIS. 337 CASES 1924 TO 1963. Ann Intern Med. 1965 Aug;63:185–198. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-63-2-185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. ROGOSA M., HAMPP E. G., NEVIN T. A., WAGNER H. N., Jr, DRISCOLL E. J., BAER P. N. Blood sampling and cultural studies in the detection of postoperative bacteremias. J Am Dent Assoc. 1960 Feb;60:171–180. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1960.0030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. STEYN J. H., LOGIE N. J. Bacteraemia following prostatectomy. Br J Urol. 1962 Dec;34:459–462. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1962.tb06530.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Sprunt K., Redman W., Leidy G. Penicillin resistant alpha Streptococci in pharynx of patients given oral penicillin. Pediatrics. 1968 Dec;42(6):957–968. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. VANDER VEER J. B., KUO P. T. Cardiac disease in pregnancy; a study of the patients with heart disease at the Philadelphia Lying-in Division of the Pennsylvania Hospital from 1937 to 1947, inclusive. Am Heart J. 1950 Jan;39(1):2–16. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(50)90003-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Van Praagh R. Terminology of congenital heart disease. Glossary and commentary. Circulation. 1977 Aug;56(2):139–143. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.56.2.139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ward H., Hickman R. C. Bacterial endocarditis in pregnancy. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1971 Aug;11(3):189–191. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.1971.tb00477.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. de Swiet M., Ramsay I. D., Rees G. M. Bacterial endocarditis after insertion of intrauterine contraceptive device. Br Med J. 1975 Jul 12;3(5975):76–77. doi: 10.1136/bmj.3.5975.76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Heart Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES