Skip to main content
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 2016 Feb 18;170(4):2232–2250. doi: 10.1104/pp.16.00014

Transcriptome Profiling of Tiller Buds Provides New Insights into PhyB Regulation of Tillering and Indeterminate Growth in Sorghum1

Tesfamichael H Kebrom 1, John E Mullet 1,*
PMCID: PMC4824614  PMID: 26893475

Buds of a phytochrome B mutant express high levels of the flowering regulators TFL1, TPPI, and gibberellic acid oxidase and become dormant, whereas wild-type buds with higher cytokinin/sugar induce a SWEET transporter, cell wall invertases, and grow into tillers.

Abstract

Phytochrome B (phyB) enables plants to modify shoot branching or tillering in response to varying light intensities and ratios of red and far-red light caused by shading and neighbor proximity. Tillering is inhibited in sorghum genotypes that lack phytochrome B (58M, phyB-1) until after floral initiation. The growth of tiller buds in the first leaf axil of wild-type (100M, PHYB) and phyB-1 sorghum genotypes is similar until 6 d after planting when buds of phyB-1 arrest growth, while wild-type buds continue growing and develop into tillers. Transcriptome analysis at this early stage of bud development identified numerous genes that were up to 50-fold differentially expressed in wild-type/phyB-1 buds. Up-regulation of terminal flower1, GA2oxidase, and TPPI could protect axillary meristems in phyB-1 from precocious floral induction and decrease bud sensitivity to sugar signals. After bud growth arrest in phyB-1, expression of dormancy-associated genes such as DRM1, GT1, AF1, and CKX1 increased and ENOD93, ACCoxidase, ARR3/6/9, CGA1, and SHY2 decreased. Continued bud outgrowth in wild-type was correlated with increased expression of genes encoding a SWEET transporter and cell wall invertases. The SWEET transporter may facilitate Suc unloading from the phloem to the apoplast where cell wall invertases generate monosaccharides for uptake and utilization to sustain bud outgrowth. Elevated expression of these genes was correlated with higher levels of cytokinin/sugar signaling in growing buds of wild-type plants.


The extent of tillering in crops affects plant density, leaf area, and the interception of light by the crop canopy. Modeling of light interception by crop canopies indicates that current genotypes often intercept an excess of light at the top of the canopy (Zhu et al., 2010; Drewry et al., 2014). Energy sorghum hybrids tiller to a greater extent than grain sorghum genotypes, often producing canopies with excess leaf area index (greater than 7; Olson et al., 2012). A more optimal distribution of light interception could be achieved by growing energy sorghum with reduced propensity for tillering at lower plant density with leaves having reduced leaf angles (Truong et al., 2015). The reduced leaf area of low tillering varieties would conserve soil moisture for the grain-filling stage in drought-prone regions (Islam and Sedgley, 1981; Kebrom and Richards, 2013). Reduced tillering associated with stay-green drought tolerance loci is also important for grain sorghum production in water-limited environments (Borrell et al., 2014). A more complete understanding of the genetic and biochemical basis of tiller production in sorghum will accelerate progress toward optimal crop canopy architectures and higher yield.

Shade is one of the major factors modifying the extent of shoot branching or tillering in crops grown at high planting density (Kebrom and Brutnell, 2007). Plants detect shade as a reduction in the intensity of red light (R) and decreases in the ratio of red (R) to far-red (FR) light. The R/FR of sunlight is about 1.2 (Holmes and Smith, 1975). The R/FR light within a canopy is reduced due to the absorption of R light by leaf chlorophyll. The microenvironment of plants grown at high density is also enriched in FR reflected from nearby plants (Ballaré et al., 1990). Plants continuously monitor R/FR using the phytochrome family of photoreceptors to detect neighbor proximity and potential competitors for light and other resources (Smith, 1995). Sorghum encodes three phytochromes (phyA, phyB, phyC), whereas other flowering plants such as Arabidopsis have up to five types of phytochromes (phyA, phyB, phyC, phyD, phyE) that regulate growth and development from germination to maturity (Sharrock and Quail, 1989; Clack et al., 1994; Mathews and Sharrock, 1996). Shade signaling is mainly regulated by phytochrome B [(phyB); Franklin and Whitelam, 2005; Martinez-Garcia et al., 2010; Casal, 2013]. Like the other phytochromes, phyB resides in an inactive R-light-absorbing form in darkness. Upon absorbing R light, phyB’s conformation changes into an active FR-absorbing form that can be converted to the R-absorbing form by FR or darkness. The ratio of active to inactive phyB is proportional to the R/FR in a consistent illumination environment at steady state. When a plant is shaded it perceives relatively higher FR than R and proportionally more phyB becomes inactive. Upon perceiving low R/FR light, plants display a set of growth and developmental changes that help them cope with or avoid shade (Martinez-Garcia et al., 2010; Casal, 2013). These responses include increased stem elongation that moves leaves above neighboring plants; inhibition of tillering, which prioritizes resources for elongating established shoots; and early flowering to escape from the detrimental effect of shade (Kebrom and Brutnell, 2007). This set of phenotypes is known as the “shade avoidance syndrome” [(SAS); Smith and Whitelam, 1997)]. PhyB-deficient plants in diverse species constitutively display the SAS (Reed et al., 1993; Childs et al., 1997; Kebrom et al., 2006; Finlayson et al., 2010). The early flowering and stem elongation responses have been investigated in-depth and are mediated in part by changes in the level or action of most of the major plant hormones (Carabelli et al., 1993; Finlayson et al., 1999; Morelli and Ruberti, 2000; Cerdán and Chory, 2003; Carabelli et al., 2007; Sheehan et al., 2007; de Lucas et al., 2008; Kim et al., 2008; Tao et al., 2008). The molecular and physiological basis of phyB- and SAS-mediated reduction in branching is less well characterized.

Shoot branches or tillers develop from buds in the axil of leaves. The development of a branch begins with the initiation of a bud meristem and formation of a boundary zone surrounding the meristem (Janssen et al., 2014). Bud development and growth then reaches a transition stage or checkpoint where growth arrest/dormancy or outgrowth fates are determined by intrinsic and environmental factors (Shimizu-Sato and Mori, 2001; Dun et al., 2006). A plant may fail to develop a branch due to defects in axillary meristem initiation or inhibition of axillary bud outgrowth (Ward and Leyser, 2004). Reduced tillering in response to shading is due to bud growth arrest and inhibition of outgrowth because axillary buds are formed normally in phyB mutants of sorghum (phyB-1) and Arabidopsis (Kebrom et al., 2006; Finlayson et al., 2010). Sorghum genotypes that lack phyB such as 58M (phyB-1) have only one stem because axillary buds become dormant during the vegetative phase (Kebrom et al., 2006, 2010). In Arabidopsis, inactivation of phyB reduces but does not eliminate branching possibly due to the action of phyD and phyE that are not present in sorghum (Finlayson et al., 2010).

Research on the evolution of enhanced apical dominance in maize relative to its wild ancestor teosinte led to the discovery that teosinte branched1 (tb1) is expressed in tiller buds and inhibits bud outgrowth (Doebley et al., 1995, 1997; Hubbard et al., 2002). Tillering in Wheat (Triticum spp.) was suppressed through transgenic overexpression of the maize tb1 gene (Lewis et al., 2008), and mutants of rice tb1 orthologs (fc1) and Arabidopsis (brc1) are highly branched, indicating a role for tb1-like genes in the regulation of shoot branching in these species (Takeda et al., 2003; Aguilar-Martínez et al., 2007; Finlayson, 2007). Comparison of the phyB mutant (phyB-1) and wild-type (PHYB) sorghum demonstrated that expression of the sorghum ortholog of tb1 (SbTB1) was approximately 2.5-fold higher in phyB-1 buds 7–9 d after planting (Kebrom et al., 2006). Phytochrome regulation of tb1-like genes was also demonstrated in Arabidopsis (Aguilar-Martínez et al., 2007; Finlayson et al., 2010). Cytokinin has been found to down-regulate expression of FC1 (tb1) in rice (Minakuchi et al., 2010) and PsBRC1 in pea (Braun et al., 2012). Therefore, differential regulation of tb1 expression in phyB-1/wild-type buds could be mediated by altered cytokinin level or signaling. Maize mutants of grassy tillers1 (gt1), a gene that encodes an HD-Zip transcription factor, are highly branched (Whipple et al., 2011). Teosinte gt1 expression was induced by FR light, and sorghum SbGt1 expression increased in buds of phyB-1 plants between 7 and 9 d after planting, but not in wild-type plants (Whipple et al., 2011). Expression of gt1 is down-regulated in tb1 mutants, therefore tb1 may regulate tillering by controlling the expression of this gene (Whipple et al., 2011).

Strigolactones (SLs) are key regulators of tillering that bind to a MAX2/D14/DAD2 complex and act in part through the TB1/BRC1/GT1 pathway (Janssen et al., 2014). MAX2 encodes an F-box protein required for SL-mediated inhibition of bud outgrowth (Stirnberg et al., 2002, 2007). The Arabidopsis max2 mutant and mutants of MAX2 orthologs in pea (RMS4) and rice (D3) are highly branched, indicating this gene regulates axillary bud outgrowth in diverse species (Stirnberg et al., 2002; Ishikawa et al., 2005; Johnson et al., 2006). Increased expression of SbMAX2 in buds of shaded plants and phyB-1 genotypes (Kebrom et al., 2010) could increase SL-mediated repression of bud outgrowth, possibly by disrupting auxin transport (Crawford et al., 2010; Domagalska and Leyser, 2011). SbMAX2 expression in axillary buds was increased by defoliation treatments that inhibit tiller outgrowth (Kebrom et al., 2010). The rose (Rosa Hybrid) RwMAX2 was expressed at lower levels in buds supplied with Suc (Barbier et al., 2015b). These results indicate phyB and sugar-sensing pathways coregulate genes involved in SL sensing that modulate tiller outgrowth.

Cytokinin (CK) promotes, and abscisic acid (ABA) inhibits, bud outgrowth through their individual actions within the bud (Pillay and Railton, 1983; Chatfield et al., 2000; Shimizu-Sato and Mori, 2001). CKs enable growing buds to escape dormancy (Müller et al., 2015). The level of CK in the stem is reduced by auxin-mediated suppression of a key CK biosynthesis gene, whereas ABA appears to inhibit bud outgrowth independently of auxin (Chatfield et al., 2000; Tanaka et al., 2006; Beveridge et al., 2009). Exposure of Arabidopsis to low R/FR illumination repressed bud outgrowth and increased expression of genes involved in ABA biosynthesis and signaling in buds (González-Grandío et al., 2013; Reddy et al., 2013). The expression of these genes was decreased when buds were stimulated to grow by R light.

An important role for sugar in regulating shoot branching has been identified. In the tiller inhibition (tin) mutant of wheat, diversion of Suc away from buds to elongating internodes inhibits bud outgrowth (Kebrom et al., 2012). Sugar also stimulates bud outgrowth in pea and rose (Rabot et al., 2012; Mason et al., 2014; Barbier et al., 2015b). The expression of the Suc-starvation-inducible Gln-dependent Asn synthase (ASN) gene was increased and Suc-inducible PFP-gene encoding pyrophosphate-Fru-6-phosphate 1-phosphotransferase was down-regulated in dormant buds of tin in wheat and in buds repressed by defoliation in sorghum (Kebrom et al., 2012; Kebrom and Mullet, 2014). The molecular mechanism regulating Suc levels, and the specific signaling pathways mediating sugar sensing in buds, remain to be discovered (Barbier et al., 2015a).

The elegant studies described above have identified, among other discoveries, a group of genes expressed in sorghum buds (i.e. TB1/BRC1, GT1, MAX2) that help repress the outgrowth of dormant buds until light conditions, sugar, and cytokinin levels/signaling are permissive for tiller outgrowth. In nonshaded conditions, phyB-signaling down-regulates the expression of TB1, GT1 and MAX2 in buds, increasing the propensity for tiller outgrowth. Less well understood is how lack of phyB-signaling leads to the initial arrest of bud growth. Moreover, additional information about the molecular and biochemical processes involved in bud outgrowth in wild-type plants under permissive conditions would help provide a more comprehensive understanding of bud development. Therefore, in this study, transcriptome profiles of tiller buds from phyB-deficient (phyB-1) and wild-type (control) sorghum plants were obtained at a critical early stage of bud development when buds of phyB-1 plants arrest growth and transition into dormancy, whereas buds of control plants grow into tillers. RNA-seq analysis was used to characterize differences in bud gene expression that are associated with phyB-regulated tillering in sorghum plants.

RESULTS

Development of Tillers in Near-Isogenic phyB-1 and Wild-Type Sorghum Genotypes

The phytochrome B null mutant sorghum genotype (58M, phyB-1) produces a main shoot that is devoid of tillers during the vegetative phase while the near-isogenic wild-type sorghum genotype (100M, PHYB) produces many tillers (Fig. 1A). Buds in phyB-1 remain dormant during the vegetative phase, but after floral initiation, axillary buds can develop into tillers (Fig. 1B). Like most genotypes of sorghum with an indeterminate or perennial-like growth habit, phyB-1 genotypes continue to develop tillers and panicles as long as conditions are favorable for growth and flowering (Fig. 1C).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Tiller development in phytochrome B mutant (phyB-1, 58M) and wild-type (PHYB, 100M) sorghum. Tillers are indicated by white arrows and the main shoot by yellow arrow. A, phyB-1 plants have one main shoot during the vegetative phase because buds become dormant soon after they are formed, while wild-type produces many tillers. B, Tiller bud outgrowth in phyB-1 is activated after the main shoot transitions into the reproductive stage. C, phyB-1 continues to develop tillers and panicles like most sorghum varieties with indeterminate or weakly perennial growth habit as long as growing conditions remain favorable for growth and flowering.

Overall Transcriptome Dynamics during Tiller Bud Development in phyB-1 and Wild-Type Sorghum

Bud growth in the first leaf axil is similar in wild-type and phyB-1 through the first 6 d after planting [(DAP; Fig. 2A) Kebrom et al., 2006, 2010]. After 6 DAP, the buds in phyB-1 plants show no or very slow growth, whereas buds of wild-type plants continue to steadily increase in size (Fig. 2A). Expression of SbDRM1, a marker of bud dormancy, was low and similar in buds of both genotypes at 6 DAP, then increased differentially approximately 3-to-5-fold in the phyB-1 relative to wild-type controls by 7/8 DAP (Fig. 2B), as previously reported (Kebrom et al., 2006).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Developmental progression of tiller buds in phytochrome B mutant (phyB-1, 58M) and wild-type (phyB, 100M) sorghum. A, Length of buds in the first leaf axil of phyB-1 and wild-type at 6, 7, and 8 DAP. B, C, Relative expression of SbDRM1, a gene associated with bud dormancy, in the phyB-1 and wild-type buds at 6, 7, and 8 DAP determined by qRT-PCR (B) and by RNA-seq (C) in RPKM mapped reads. Data are means ± se, n = 10 buds (A) and three biological replicates (B and C).

RNA for RNA-seq analysis was obtained from buds dissected from the first leaf axil of wild-type and phyB-1 at 6 DAP, 7 DAP, and 8 DAP and used to prepare the cDNA template for sequencing. The average reads from a total of three biological replicates was 40.1 million, of which 93.9% mapped to the sorghum reference sequence Sbicolor-v2.1_255 (Phytozome; http://www.phytozome.net), which encodes 33,032 annotated genes and 39,441 transcripts (Supplemental Table S1). RNA-seq data from biological replicates were found to co-cluster when assessed using principal component analysis (Supplemental Fig. S1). Transcriptomes of buds of phyB-1 and wild-type plants increasingly diverged between 6 DAP and 8 DAP. Relative gene expression was estimated by analyzing RNA-seq data in CLC Bio Genomics Workbench (CLC, Aarhus, Denmark), using reads per kilobase per million (RPKM) mapped read values, and a false discovery rate (FDR) of <5% (Supplemental Table S2). Relative expression results from RNA-seq were confirmed using quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR; Figs. 2, B and C, and Supplemental Fig. S2), and were consistent with prior qRT-PCR analysis of bud gene expression (Kebrom et al., 2006, 2010; Whipple et al., 2011). For example, SbDRM1 mRNA levels in phyB-1 and wild-type buds analyzed by RNA-seq (RPKM) and qRT-PCR showed that RNA abundance in buds was similar at 6 DAP and that by 8 DAP, 5-fold higher in phyB-1 buds relative to wild-type, confirming prior results (Fig. 2, B and C).

Genes that were differentially expressed in at least one of the time points analyzed are listed in Supplemental Table S2. There were 127 (6 DAP), 315 (7 DAP), and 611 (8 DAP) genes up- or down-regulated ≥2-fold (RPKM ≥ 2) in buds of phyB-1 plants relative to the corresponding wild-type controls (Supplemental Fig. S3). A total of 71 genes were consistently differentially expressed in phyB-1 buds relative to wild-type controls at all time points assayed. A large number of the differentially expressed genes categorized by MapMan software (Thimm et al., 2004) function in hormone metabolism and signaling, response to stress, transcription (RNA synthesis), protein synthesis, signaling, development, and transport (Supplemental Table S3). Differentially expressed genes with biological relevance based on established knowledge of regulation of dormancy and outgrowth of axillary buds, flowering time, and vegetative meristem identity maintenance in diverse species and novel genes that are up- or down-regulated greater than 5-fold in the phyB-1 buds relative to the corresponding wild-type controls, were analyzed in more detail beginning with genes differentially expressed at 6 DAP.

Differential Expression of Cell Cycle Genes and Peter pan in Growth-Arrested Buds at 6 DAP

Bud growth arrest occurs in phyB-1 at 6 DAP, although seedling shoot and root growth continues (Kebrom et al., 2006). Differential bud growth arrest in phyB-1 could be due to differences in bud gene expression caused by the absence of phyB-signaling during the first 6 d of bud growth leading to the depletion of a gene product required for cell division or growth, or the buildup of one or more repressors. To examine this possibility, we searched for genes involved in the cell cycle and growth that were differentially expressed in buds of phyB-1 compared to wild-type plants at 6 DAP.

Expression of cell cycle genes such as SbHis4, SbCycD2, SbCDKB, SbCycB, and SbPCNA was previously found to be similar in buds of phyB-1 and wild-type (Kebrom et al., 2010). In this study, genes involved in the cell cycle were expressed at similar levels in buds of both genotypes at 6 DAP, and showed minimal change in relative expression from 6 DAP to 8 DAP consistent with prior analysis based on an overall survey of genes involved in the cell cycle and cell division (Supplemental Figs. S4 and S5). The expression of an E2F3-like gene Sb08g003670.1 was reduced approximately 3-fold in phyB-1 buds at 8 DAP (Fig. 3A). The E2F transcription factor is a component of the retinoblastoma/E2F/Dp pathway of the cell cycle that controls progression from G1 to s-phase by activating genes required for the s-phase of the cell cycle (Inzé and De Veylder, 2006). In Arabidopsis, AtE2FA is required for lateral root initiation and vascular patterning (Berckmans et al., 2011).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Expression of A, the cell cycle gene E2F3 (Sb08g003670.1); B, Peter pan-like genes Sb01g035700.1; C, Sb01g035720.1 determined by RNA-seq in buds in the first leaf axil of the phytochrome B mutant (phyB-1) and wild-type (PHYB) controls at 6, 7, and 8 DAP. Data are mean RPKM mapped reads ± se; n = 3 biological replicates.

A broader survey for genes that could regulate growth identified Sb01g035700.1, a gene expressed at greater than 100-fold lower levels in phyB-1 buds compared to wild-type (Fig. 3B). This sorghum gene is homologous to Peter pan, a member of the SSF1/2 gene family, first identified in Drosophila as a gene required for normal mitotic growth (Migeon et al., 1999) and ribosome biogenesis (Eisenhaber et al., 2001). Sorghum encodes two Peter pan-like genes and while Sb01g035700.1 was nearly completely silenced in phyB-1 buds, another sorghum gene homologous to Peter pan, Sb01g035720.1, was expressed at similar levels in both phyB-1 and wild-type axillary buds (Fig. 3C).

Differential Expression of Genes that Regulate Meristem Differentiation and Gibberellin and T6P Levels

SbCN2 (Sb04g021650.1), a homolog of TFL1 (ZCN2, OsRCN2), was expressed at approximately 34-fold higher levels in phyB-1 buds at 6 DAP, and 86-fold higher levels compared to wild-type buds by 8 DAP (Fig. 4). TFL1’s role in preventing floral induction is well known (Lifschitz et al., 2014) and expression of ZCN2 (TFL1/SbCN2) was previously reported in axillary buds of maize (Danilevskaya et al., 2010). Elevated expression of SbCN2 in buds of phyB-1 plants indicates that in the absence of phyB-signaling, increased expression of TFL1 enhances the barrier to floral induction. Expression of SbCN4 (ZCN4, OsRCN4) is differentially up-regulated in phyB-1 buds starting at 8 DAP (Fig. 4). ZCN4 is expressed in maize root apical regions (Danilevskaya et al., 2010). The increase in expression of this gene in phyB-1 at 8 DAP may indicate that nascent root meristems of the bud have developed and require protection from premature differentiation.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Differential expression of genes that regulate meristem differentiation, trehalose-6-phosphate levels, and growth identified by RNA-seq in buds in the first leaf axil of phytochrome B mutant (phyB-1) relative to the corresponding wild-type (PHYB) sorghum at 6, 7, and 8 DAP. Boxes with green color indicating genes expressed more highly in phyB-1 and red color indicating genes expressed at lower levels in buds of phyB-1 compared to wild-type. Values in boxes are fold-differences in phyB-1 relative to the corresponding wild-type controls, and represent the mean of three biological replicates with a corresponding FDR less than 5%. Blank boxes represent values less than 2-fold and/or a corresponding FDR greater than 5%.

Several additional genes that regulate the transition from the vegetative to reproductive phase were differentially expressed to a limited extent in phyB-1 buds (Fig. 4). Genes that promote flowering such as LEAFY3-like (LFY3, Sb06g027340.1) and flowering promoting factor1 (FPF1; sb03g044960.1) were expressed at 2-fold higher levels in phyB-1 buds. In addition, two splice variants of a gene similar to the Arabidopsis MADS-box, SHORT VEGETATIVE PHASE (Sb01g044810.1 and Sb01g044810.2) that encodes a repressor of flowering (Hartmann et al., 2000), were expressed at 2-fold higher levels in phyB-1 buds at 7 DAP and 8 DAP. The expression of APETALA1-like (Sb02g038780.1) was reduced approximately 3-fold in phyB-1 buds at 8 DAP. The expression of the APETALA1-like and LFY3 is repressed by TFL1 in different domains of the Arabidopsis shoot apical meristem (Conti and Bradley, 2007).

Gibberellin (GA) plays an important role in regulating floral transition (Sun, 2008) and many other aspects of growth and development (Claeys et al., 2014). GA biosynthesis/turnover, signaling, and expression of GA-responsive genes have been associated directly or indirectly with variation in shoot branching (Lo et al., 2008; Mauriat et al., 2011; Ni et al., 2015). Genes encoding GA2ox1 were expressed at 7-fold to 18-fold higher levels in phyB-1 buds compared to wild-type at all time points examined (Fig. 4). Elevated expression of GA2ox1 genes in phyB-1 buds indicates that GA levels are maintained at low levels in the absence of phyB-signaling, creating an additional barrier to floral induction and growth.

Reduction in trehalose-6-phospate inhibits flowering and growth (Schluepmann et al., 2003; van Dijken et al., 2004; Delatte et al., 2011; Wahl et al., 2013). Therefore, elevated expression of a TPPI-like gene in phyB-1 buds at 6 DAP (9-fold) through 8 DAP (34-fold) compared to buds of wild-type plants could impact bud physiology (Fig. 4). Other members of the TPP and TPS gene family were also differentially expressed in phyB-1 versus wild-type buds, but to a lesser extent and for most, starting after 6 DAP (Fig. 4).

Additional Genes Differentially Expressed More Than 5-Fold in phyB-1/Wild-Type Buds at 6 DAP

Genes with diverse and in some cases, unknown functions also showed high levels of differential expression in phyB-1 buds at 6 DAP through 8 DAP (Supplemental Fig. S6). For example, genes encoding an F-box protein and VQ-motif protein are expressed approximately 80-fold and approximately 30-fold higher in phyB-1 buds at 6 DAP. The gene family encoding F-box proteins is very large (>600; Xu et al., 2009) and these proteins function in numerous pathways including hormone signaling and Glc-delayed seed germination (Song et al., 2012). Proteins with VQ-motifs interact with WRKY-transcription factors and MAP-kinases (Weyhe et al., 2014) and regulate seedling deetiolation (Li et al., 2014), endosperm growth (Wang et al., 2010), and responses to biotic and abiotic stress (Weyhe et al., 2014). A gene encoding an AAP3-like gene showed consistently higher expression in buds of phyB-1 (Supplemental Fig. S6). AAP3 amino-acid permeases are located in the plasmalemma and import amino acids from the apoplast into the phloem (Okumoto et al., 2004), but the exact role and localization of the bud-expressed member of the AAP3 gene family is unknown. Genes encoding a haloacid dehalogenase-like hydrolase and UDP-glucosyl transferase 85A2 were both expressed at higher levels in buds of phyB-1. The gene encoding UDP-glucosyl transferase 85A2 was expressed at approximately 7-fold higher levels in phyB-1 buds at 6 DAP, and at 19-fold and 55-fold higher levels at 7 DAP and 8 DAP, respectively (Supplemental Fig. S6). This enzyme mediates synthesis of DIBOA-glucoside, a compound involved in plant defense (Dick et al., 2012). DIBOA-glucoside is cleaved to form DIMBOA by a plastid-localized beta-glucosidase. A gene (sb08g007610) encoding a plastid beta-glucosidase that may be involved in DIMBOA synthesis was expressed at approximately 9-fold lower levels in phyB-1 at 6 DAP. DIMBOA is a compound used by plants for defense against herbivores; therefore, increased expression of this gene may be to protect buds from pests/pathogens (Frey et al., 1997; Dick et al., 2012). Genes encoding CTP-synthase, vacuolar iron transporter, and heat shock proteins are expressed at lower levels in phyB-1 buds compared to wild type at 6 DAP. Reduced expression of these genes may be a consequence of growth inhibition.

Differential Gene Expression in phyB-1 Buds Beginning at 7/8 DAP

DRM1 is a marker for the bud dormancy program (Kebrom et al., 2006). After arrest of bud growth at 6 DAP in phyB-1, this gene is differentially induced approximately 3-fold at 7 DAP and approximately 6-fold by 8 DAP (Fig. 2). Numerous genes with expression kinetics similar to DRM1 in phyB-1 buds were identified (i.e. DIN1), including genes encoding transcription factors previously shown to regulate bud outgrowth that will be described below (Kebrom et al., 2006, 2010, 2012). Increased expression of ASN (Sb01g038460; approximately 5–8-fold) and decreased expression of a gene-encoding asparaginase (Sb06g030910; 51-fold) is consistent with increased n-storage/decreased amino-acid utilization in growth-inhibited phyB-1 buds at 8 DAP (Fig. 5). In addition, several SbENOD93-like genes were expressed at 6-fold to 90-fold lower levels in phyB-1 buds compared to wild-type starting at 7 DAP (Fig. 5). Expression of ribosomal protein genes in buds of the two genotypes was similar at 6 DAP; however, transcript levels of several nuclear genes encoding plastid ribosomal proteins decreased approximately 2- to 3-fold in phyB-1 compared to wild-type buds by 8 DAP (Supplemental Fig. S7). In pea and Arabidopsis, the expression of genes encoding ribosomal protein genes is lower in dormant buds (Devitt and Stafstrom, 1995; González-Grandío et al., 2013).

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Gene expression associated with induction of bud dormancy identified by RNA-seq in buds in the first leaf axil of phytochrome B mutant (phyB-1) sorghum relative to wild-type (PHYB) controls at 6, 7, and 8 DAP. Boxes with green color indicate genes expressed at higher levels in buds of phyB-1/wild-type, and red color indicates genes expressed at lower relative levels in phyB-1 buds. Values in boxes are fold-differences in expression in phyB-1 relative to wild-type controls, and represent the mean of three biological replicates with a corresponding FDR less than 5%. Blank boxes represent values less than 2-fold and/or a corresponding FDR greater than 5%.

Differential Expression of Genes during Wild-Type Bud Outgrowth at 7/8 DAP

Axillary buds of wild-type continue growing from 6 DAP to 8 DAP and will escape dormancy and form a tiller under the growth conditions used in this study. Increased expression of an MtN3 gene that encodes a SWEET sugar transporter between 6 DAP and 7 DAP in wild-type plants could help supply Suc from the phloem of the main plant for continued growth and development of buds (Fig. 6). Increased expression of two genes (Sb0067s002110.1 and Sb0067s002130.1) encoding cell wall invertases (cwINV) in buds of wild-type between 6 DAP and 7 DAP could cleave Suc unloaded into the apoplast to Glc and Fru for uptake by developing buds (Fig. 6; Sherson et al., 2003; Weschke et al., 2003). A gene encoding an RNase T2 protein expressed at low levels in both phyB-1 and wild-type buds at 6 DAP, was up-regulated greater than 10-fold in growing buds of wild-type at 7 DAP and 8 DAP (Supplemental Table S2). RNase T2 could be involved recycling phosphate required for outgrowth (MacIntosh et al., 2010; Hillwig et al., 2011).

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Expression of genes encoding cwINVs and sugar transport determined by RNA-seq in buds in the first leaf axil of the phytochrome B mutant (phyB-1) and wild-type (PHYB) sorghum controls at 6, 7, and 8 DAP. A, B, C, [cwINVs Sb0067s002110.1 (CwINV1); Sb0067s002130.1 (CwINV2); nodulin MtN3 (SWEET) family sugar transport protein (Sb07g026040.1), respectively]. Data are mean RPKM mapped reads ± se; n = 3 biological replicates.

Differential Expression of Genes Encoding Transcription Factors

Transcriptome analysis revealed a large number of genes encoding transcription factors that are induced or repressed in phyB-1 buds relative to wild-type with varying time courses (Fig. 7). Genes differentially expressed by 6 DAP included EEL, LSH3, GT1, protodermal factor1, HB1, and a WRKY transcription factor (Fig. 7). EEL (DPBF4/AtbZIP11) and ABI5 are bZIP transcription factors that interact with G-box motifs and regulate genes involved in the biosynthesis of Asn- and Asp-derived amino acids in response to sugar levels/ABA (Ufaz et al., 2011). Expression of EEL/DPBF4/AtbZIP12 was approximately 8-fold higher at 6 DAP and 16-fold higher in buds of phyB-1 at 8 DAP (Fig. 7). Sorghum genes homologous to LSH3 (Sb02g002650.1), a gene involved in shoot organ boundary formation (Cho and Zambryski, 2011), and protodermal factor1 (Sb04g008270.1), were expressed at 5- to 16-fold higher levels in buds of phyB-1 plants. SbGt1 RNA was 2-fold higher in buds of phyB-1 at 6 DAP and accumulated further by 8 DAP resulting in 3- to 5-fold differential expression relative to wild type (Kebrom et al., 2006, 2010; Whipple et al., 2011). SbTB1 transcripts were not detected by RNA-seq. However, using qRT-PCR, SbTB1 RNA levels were detected at approximately 2-fold higher in phyB-1 buds relative to wild type (Supplemental Fig. S8). Expression analysis via qRT-PCR utilized cDNAs prepared using random hexamer priming. In contrast, RNA-seq libraries were prepared from mRNA purified using poly-T oligo-attached magnetic beads. Similarly, tb1 was not detected in cDNA prepared from two-week-old maize plants using T7 Oligo (dT) primers (Vega-Arreguín et al., 2009). Therefore, it is possible that tb1 transcripts in maize and sorghum lack polyA tracts long enough for binding to the oligo(dT) primers used to prepare cDNA.

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

Differential expression of genes encoding transcription factors identified by RNA-seq in buds in the first leaf axil of phytochrome B mutant (phyB-1) sorghum relative to wild-type (PHYB) controls at 6, 7, and 8 DAP. Boxes with green color indicate genes expressed at higher levels in buds of phyB-1 relative to wild-type, and red color indicates lower relative expression. Values in boxes are fold-differences in expression between phyB-1 and wild-type controls, and represent the mean of three biological replicates with a corresponding FDR less than 5%. Blank boxes represent values less than 2-fold and/or a corresponding FDR greater than 5%.

The sorghum AtHB1-like gene (Sb04g029080.2) was expressed at lower levels in phyB-1 buds at 6 DAP (4-fold), 7 DAP (12-fold), and 8 DAP (15-fold). Transgenic expression of Arabidopsis AtHB-1 in tobacco indicated a role in leaf development (Aoyama et al., 1995). Arabidopsis AtHB1 is regulated by phytochrome/PIF1 signaling and also plays a role in activating hypocotyl elongation (Capella et al., 2015). Therefore, down-regulation of SbHB1 in phyB-1 buds is consistent with growth arrest and bud dormancy. A gene encoding a WRKY transcription factor (Sb04g33240) was also expressed at lower levels in phyB-1 buds from 6 DAP to 8 DAP, and expression of a bZIP transcription factor (bZIP44, Sb07g015450.1) was reduced in phyB-1 buds at 7 DAP and 8 DAP (Fig. 7). Six genes encoding NAC domain-containing proteins, including genes similar to the Arabidopsis ANAC029, showed increased expression in phyB-1 buds at 8 DAP (Fig. 7). The expression of the Arabidopsis ANAC029 is associated with leaf senescence (Guo and Gan, 2006). Several homeobox transcription factors (WOX, Knotted-like, and Bell) were differentially expressed in phyB-1 buds at 7/8 DAP (Fig. 7). These transcription factors function in meristem maintenance and leaf development.

Differential Expression of Genes Involved in Plant Hormone Metabolism and Signaling

Plant hormones play a key role in regulating bud outgrowth, and variation in hormone level or signaling could be causing some of the differences in gene expression observed in buds (Beveridge et al., 2009; Müller and Leyser, 2011). While analysis of hormone pathways in seedling leaves and roots was beyond the scope of this study, we conducted an analysis of genes involved in hormone biosynthesis or signaling that are differentially expressed in phyB-1 and wild-type buds (Fig. 8). CKs promote bud outgrowth (Müller et al., 2015). The expression of a CK-responsive GATA transcription factor (Sb04g007750.1) similar to the Arabidopsis CGA1 (Chiang et al., 2012) was induced in wild-type buds by approximately 8- and 15-fold at 7 DAP and 8 DAP, respectively (Fig. 8, S9). CK levels in phyB-1 buds could be lower than wild-type due to elevated expression of a CK-deactivating gene, cytokinin oxidase/dehydrogenase1 (CKX1, Sb03g045410.1) in phyB-1 buds relative to wild-type controls from 6 DAP (2-fold) to 8 DAP (6-fold; Fig. 8, S9). In addition, four genes encoding CK-inducible type-A response regulators (ARRs; D’Agostino et al., 2000) were expressed at 3- to 4-fold lower levels in phyB-1 buds as early as 6 DAP (Fig. 8). Expression of SbARR3 (Sb04g026750) decreased approximately 7- to 11-fold between 6 DAP and 8 DAP in buds of phyB-1 but not in wild type (Fig. 8, S9). The expression of sorghum SHY2/IAA3 (Sb01g005110.1) decreased in phyB-1 buds relative to wild-type controls between 7 DAP and 8 DAP (Fig. 8). Expression of SHY2/IAA3 in Arabidopsis roots that is induced by CKs (Dello Ioio et al., 2008) therefore reduced expression of SHY2/IAA3 in phyB-1 buds, which is consistent with lower CK levels in phyB-1 tiller buds relative to wild type.

Figure 8.

Figure 8.

Differential expression of genes involved in plant hormone metabolism and signaling identified by RNA-seq in buds in the first leaf axil of phytochrome B mutant (phyB-1) sorghum relative to the corresponding wild-type (PHYB) controls at 6, 7, and 8 DAP. A, CK; B, ethylene; C, ABA; D, auxin. Boxes with green color indicate genes that are expressed at higher levels in phyB-1/wild-type, and red color indicates genes expressed at lower relative levels in phyB-1. Values in boxes are fold-differences in phyB-1 relative to wild-type controls, and represent the mean of three biological replicates with a corresponding FDR less than 5%. Blank boxes or asterisks indicate values less than 2-fold and/or a corresponding FDR greater than 5%.

Down-regulation of several genes encoding ACC oxidase1 that catalyze the last step of ethylene biosynthesis may reduce ethylene production in phyB-1 buds (Fig. 8). In particular, the expression of Sb03g026000.1 was 10-fold lower in phyB-1 buds relative to the corresponding wild-type controls, at 7 DAP and 8 DAP. The expression of an ethylene-responsive protein-related gene, Sb04g032150.1, was 28.6-fold lower in phyB-1 buds at 8 DAP. AP2/EREBP-like genes, Sb01g045060.1 and Sb10g005520.1, were also down-regulated in phyB-1 buds. The expression of the sorghum orthologs of Arabidopsis AP2/EREBP genes (At1g72360 and At5g25190) is induced by ethylene (Yang et al., 2011; Zhang et al., 2011). Therefore, down-regulation of AP2/EREBP and ethylene-responsive genes in phyB-1 buds could be due to decreased expression of several ACC oxidase1 genes involved in ethylene biosynthesis.

Inhibition of bud outgrowth by FR in Arabidopsis has been linked to an increase in the expression of ABA biosynthesis and signaling genes and ABA level (González-Grandío et al., 2013; Reddy et al., 2013). Analysis of differentially expressed genes in phyB-1/wild-type buds identified several changes in gene expression related to ABA synthesis or signaling between 6 DAP and 8 DAP (Fig. 8). A gene similar to the Arabidopsis aldehyde oxidase (AAO2) that catalyzes the conversion of abscisic aldehyde into ABA (Leydecker et al., 1995; Seo et al., 2000) was reduced approximately 4- to 6-fold in phyB-1 buds relative to the corresponding wild-type controls at all time points. A gene encoding abscisic acid 8′-hydroxylase (Sb02g026600.1) that deactivates ABA, and a protein phosphatase 2C (ABI1, Sb09g022410.1) that is a negative regulator of ABA signaling (Gosti et al., 1999; Bensmihen et al., 2002), were also expressed at a higher levels in phyB-1 buds. However, the expression of two ABA-inducible genes, Sb01g021730.1 (mediator of ABA-regulated dormancy1; He and Gan, 2004) and Sb05g017940.1 (HVA22-like; Shen et al., 2001), was higher in phyB-1 buds relative to the corresponding wild-type controls. A NAC domain containing transcription factor (Sb03g041920.2) homologous to Arabidopsis AtAF1 (ANAC002) was up-regulated by about 18.6-fold in phyB-1 buds at 8 DAP. The AtAF1 gene in Arabidopsis increases ABA level by directly up-regulating the expression of the ABA biosynthesis gene NINE-CIS-EPOXYCAROTENOID DIOXYGENASE3 (NCED3; Jensen et al., 2013). NCED3 was among ABA-related genes up-regulated in Arabidopsis buds grown under low R/FR and down-regulated at high R/FR (Reddy et al., 2013). The expression of the sorghum ortholog of Arabidopsis NCED3, Sb01g013520, was slightly elevated in phyB-1 buds at 8 DAP, but not significantly different from the expression level in wild-type buds (Fig. 8).

Relatively few genes involved in SL and auxin responses were differentially expressed in phyB-1/wild-type buds. SbMAX2 showed 2-fold higher expression in phyB-1 buds at 8 DAP as previously reported Supplemental Table S2. The auxin-responsive SAUR genes and dwarf in light1 (DFL1) were differentially expressed to some extent (Fig. 8). The DFL1 gene, a homolog of G3, inhibits cell elongation and lateral root formation in light in response to auxin (Nakazawa et al., 2001). Expression of two DFL1-like genes (Sb03g036680.1 and Sb09g024710.1) increased in buds of phyB-1 at 8 DAP (Fig. 8).

DISCUSSION

Axillary meristems are initiated in leaf axils and develop into tiller buds that can grow into tillers or become dormant in nonpermissive growth conditions (Fig. 9). Research on bud outgrowth has identified numerous factors that promote outgrowth such as CKs, sugars, and phyB-signaling, and inhibitors such as SL, auxin, and ABA (Beveridge et al., 2009; Müller and Leyser, 2011; Kebrom et al., 2013; Janssen et al., 2014; Wang and Wang, 2015; Yuan et al., 2015; Barbier et al., 2015a). This study focused on early steps in bud development that lead to growth arrest and dormancy in phyB-1 or outgrowth in wild-type seedlings (Fig. 9). Bud axillary meristem formation and growth were similar in phyB-1 and wild-type until 6 DAP, when bud growth differentially arrests in phyB-1 (Fig. 9). Dormant buds of phyB-1 plants can grow out after floral initiation, indicating that bud growth arrest is reversible. A similar seedling growth checkpoint, mediated by ABI5/ABA, occurs during the first 3 d after seed germination (Lopez-Molina et al., 2001). Differences in gene expression in axillary buds of phyB-1 and wild-type at 6 DAP could contribute to growth arrest of buds in phyB-1 (Fig. 9, lower left). After growth arrest, buds of phyB-1 transition into dormancy, a developmental process associated with further changes in gene expression between 6 DAP and 8 DAP (Fig. 9, lower right). In contrast, in the wild-type, tiller growth and development continues between 6 DAP and 8 DAP leading to tiller outgrowth (Fig. 9, top). Analysis of wild-type bud transcriptomes during this interval identified increased expression of MtN3, encoding a SWEET transporter, and two cwINVs as key events during tiller outgrowth (Fig. 9, top right). After 9 DAP, developing tillers of wild-type plants no longer respond to shade signals by inhibiting tiller growth, but instead accelerate growth in a manner similar to the shade avoidance response of the main shoot (Kebrom et al., 2006). Thus, the interval from 6 DAP to 8 DAP corresponds to a transition stage when bud growth occurs in the wild type but can still be inhibited by shading, and bud dormancy development occurs in growth-arrested buds of phyB-1. Since phyB-1 plants lack phyB-signaling from leaves, leaf sheaths, and buds from germination through 8 DAP, differences in bud gene expression in phyB-1/wild-type could be a direct (in buds) or indirect (via leaf phyB-signaling) consequence of lack of phyB in phyB-1 seedlings. Analysis of leaf transcriptomes of phyB-1/wild-type during this same phase of development is planned to investigate the possible role of leaf-derived phyB-signaling that could modulate bud growth and development. In addition, while this study identified a large number of phyB-regulated changes in gene expressions that are associated with bud development, phyB is also known to regulate gene expression at posttranscriptional levels.

Figure 9.

Figure 9.

A summary of patterns of differential expression of genes associated with bud outgrowth or dormancy in phytochrome B null (phyB-1, 58M, red) and wild-type (PHYB, 100M, green) sorghum genotypes at 6, 7, and 8 DAP. The bud in wild type continues growing and develops into tiller whereas the growth of the bud in the phyB-1 is arrested and becomes dormant. Symbols “>” and “>>” indicate up-regulated and dramatically up-regulated genes, respectively; “<” and “<<” indicate down-regulated and dramatically down-regulated genes, respectively. Arrows indicate the timing of differential expression of genes. Genes with a short arrow are differentially expressed at 8 DAP; genes with a long arrow are differentially expressed at 7 and 8 DAP; and genes without an arrow, such as the Peter pan, HB1, etc, are differentially expressed at 6, 7, and 8 DAP.

Maintenance of Bud Vegetative Meristems in phyB-1 Sorghum

Elevated expression of TFL1, GA2oxidases, and TPPI in buds of phyB-1 compared to wild-type plants could result in enhanced protection of axillary buds from floral transition. Expression of TFL1 (SbCN2) was approximately 30-fold higher in buds of phyB-1 plants at 6 DAP and approximately 80-fold higher by 8 DAP. TFL1 is a member of the phosphatidyl ethanolamine-binding protein gene family, and members of this family in Arabidopsis include FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT), MOTHER OF FT AND TFL1 (MFT), and CENTRORADIALIS homolog (ATC), genes that activate flowering (Karlgren et al., 2011). TFL1-like genes encode proteins that are expressed in meristems and bind to leaf-derived FT to prevent FT-induced flowering (Lifschitz et al., 2014). The AaTFL1 in Arabis alpina prevents young shoots from transitioning into flowering, thereby maintaining a perennial growth habit (Wang et al., 2011). The indeterminate growth habit is lost in TFL1 mutants of antirrhinum (CENTRORADIALIS) and tomato (SELF-PRUNING; Bradley et al., 1996; Pnueli et al., 1998).

TFL1 is expressed in the shoot apical meristem and axillary meristems of Arabidopsis (Conti and Bradley, 2007), maize (Danilevskaya et al., 2010), and sorghum. The proposed function of Elevated expression of the TFL1-like gene SbCN2 in phyB-1 sorghum tiller buds is to protect these vegetative axillary meristems from florigenic signals in a manner similar to perennial plants. In annual crops, such as wheat, the transition from vegetative to the reproductive phase converts all apical and axillary meristems from vegetative to inflorescence meristems (Hay and Kirby, 1991; Evers et al., 2006; Kebrom et al., 2012). In perennial plants, vegetative meristems in axillary buds do not transition to flowering before forming a vegetative shoot during the next growth cycle, which ensures a perennial growth habit (Rohde and Bhalerao, 2007). Grain sorghum is classified as weakly perennial (Dewet and Huckabay, 1967), but sorghum germplasm can exhibit a wide range of annual to perennial growth habits. Sorghum and maize florigens are produced in leaves by ZCN8/SbCN8 and ZCN12/SbCN12 (Danilevskaya et al., 2010; Murphy et al., 2011). Flowering in sorghum is inhibited in long day photoperiods by repressing the expression of SbCN8 and SbCN12 through a pathway that requires phyB-signaling (Murphy et al., 2011; Yang et al., 2014). Therefore, phyB-1 or shaded plants have greater propensity to produce FT, and increased expression of TFL1 (SbCN2) in axillary buds of these plants may be needed to prevent precocious floral transition.

Genes encoding GA2ox1 were expressed at approximately 7- to 18-fold higher levels in buds of phyB-1 plants. Elevated expression of these genes is expected to reduce GA levels and increase DELLA activity in phyB-1 buds. GA is an important regulator of meristem development (Ubeda-Tomas and Bennett, 2010), growth, and flowering (Xu et al., 2014). GA levels are elevated in leaves of phyB-1 mutants and shade-treated plants in diverse species (Rood et al., 1990; Lee et al., 1998; Hisamatsu et al., 2005). Therefore, increased expression of genes encoding GA2ox1 in phyB-1 buds may be required to prevent GA-mediated growth and floral promotion. In maize, rice, and Arabidopsis, GA2oxidase is expressed around the subapical region of the shoot apical meristem (SAM) during the vegetative phase and deactivates GA derived from young leaves and leaf primordia, thereby protecting the SAM from precocious transition into flowering (Sakamoto et al., 2001; Jasinski et al., 2005; Bolduc and Hake, 2009). The expression of GA2oxidase at the base of the SAM in maize is maintained in part by KNOX and BELL transcription factors (Bolduc and Hake, 2009). The expression of the Knox and BELL genes was 2- to 4-fold higher in the phyB-1 buds at 8 DAP, which may enhance or maintain elevated expression of GA2oxidases. The FPF1 mediates GA3-induced flowering (Kania et al., 1997). FPF1 and LFY3, genes that promote flowering, are expressed at 2- to 3-fold higher levels in buds of phyB-1 plants. These genes are also up-regulated in apical meristems induced to flower by shading or inductive photoperiods that would reduce phyB-signaling (Blázquez and Weigel, 1999). Therefore, increased expression of TFL1 and genes encoding GA2ox1 in phyB-deficient plants may help antagonize the floral-promoting effects of these genes. GA2ox1-mediated reduction in GA level and elevated DELLA activity in phyB-1 buds may have additional functions related to bud growth arrest and induction of dormancy (Choubane et al., 2012).

Growth Arrest and Maintenance of Cell Cycle Gene Expression in phyB-1 Buds

The molecular mechanism causing the arrest of bud growth in phyB-1 is unknown, but strongly reduced expression of a gene homologous to Peter pan may be involved. The sorghum genome encodes two Peter pan-like genes and expression of one of the Peter pan-like genes was reduced by approximately 100-fold in buds of phyB-1 compared to wild-type. Peter pan was first identified as a gene required for larval growth in Drosophila (Migeon et al., 1999). Down-regulation of both Peter pan genes (SSF1 and SSF2) in yeast leads to cell division arrest (Yu and Hirsch, 1995). In Xenopus laevis, ppan and pes1 interact and regulate ribosome biogenesis, cell proliferation, apoptosis, and gene expression (Tecza et al., 2011). Expression of PPAN and PES1 in developing pronephros is dependent on wnt4 and fzd3 function, key regulators of cell growth and cell cycle progression (Tecza et al., 2011; Pfister et al., 2015). While the function of Peter pan has not been examined in plants, strong down-regulation of this gene in growth-inhibited buds of phyB-1 plants at 6 DAP, suggests that low Peter pan expression may contribute to inhibition of growth and cell division in buds of these plants.

Transcriptome analysis showed similar levels of cell cycle gene expression in buds of phyB-1 and wild-type plants at 6 DAP, consistent with prior analysis (Kebrom et al., 2010). Continued expression of cyclins and cyclin-dependent protein kinases indicates the cell division machinery in growth-arrested buds of phyB-1 is on standby until at least 8 DAP, similar to cambial meristem dormancy in hybrid aspen (Espinosa-Ruiz et al., 2004). Reduced expression of a sorghum homolog of AtE2F3 in phyB-1 buds starting at 8 DAP could contribute to further inhibition of cell division as part of the bud dormancy program. Cell cycle gene expression was decreased in Arabidopsis buds inhibited by shade signals in a BRC1-dependent manner (González-Grandío et al., 2013). Over-expression of AtE2FA in Arabidopsis induces mature leaf cells to reenter the cell cycle (Rossignol et al., 2002), and AtE2FA silencing reduces cotyledon and root growth and cell proliferation (Magyar et al., 2012). Decapitation increases cell cycle and ribosomal protein gene expression in dormant buds of Arabidopsis and pea and stimulates bud outgrowth (Devitt and Stafstrom, 1995; Tatematsu et al., 2005). Taken together, growth arrest at 6 DAP is not associated with decreased expression of genes involved in the cell cycle, but reduced expression of a sorghum homolog of AtE2F3 at 8 DAP and elevated expression of SbTB1 in phyB-1 buds may lead to reduced expression of genes involved in the cell cycle as the dormancy program becomes more fully established after 8 DAP.

PhyB-Regulated TPP Expression—Possible Impact on Flowering, Growth, and Sugar-Signaling

The dormancy-versus-growth fates of axillary buds in diverse species have been linked to the level of Suc/sugar-signaling and to changes in the expression of Suc-responsive genes in buds (Kebrom et al., 2012; Rabot et al., 2012; Kebrom and Mullet, 2014; Mason et al., 2014). Sugar signaling occurs through pathways involving hexokinase, trehalose-6-phosphate/SnRK1, and TOR, and by direct effects of sugars on growth and metabolism (Rolland et al., 2006; Lunn et al., 2014; Ruan, 2014). In this study, transcriptome analysis revealed that the trehalose phosphate phosphatase TPPI-like gene was expressed at 9-fold higher levels in buds of phyB-1 at 6 DAP and 34-fold higher at 8 DAP. Other members of the TPP/TPS gene family were differentially expressed, including a 2-fold to 8-fold increase in the expression of five class II TPS genes in phyB-1 buds at 8 DAP. The class II TPS genes do not have TPS or TPP activities (Lunn et al., 2014). The expression of the Arabidopsis and maize class II TPS genes is induced by Suc starvation (Henry et al., 2014; Yadav et al., 2014).

Trehalose-6-phosphate is required for growth (Schluepmann et al., 2003) and flowering (van Dijken et al., 2004; Wahl et al., 2013) and can modify inflorescence branching (Satoh-Nagasawa et al., 2006), among other functions (Vandesteene et al., 2012). Ramosa3, a member of the TPP-gene family in maize, is expressed in domains subtending axillary inflorescence meristems, and mutations in Ramosa3 increase the number of long branches in tassels (Satoh-Nagasawa et al., 2006). Loss of TPP activity in tassal meristems is thought to increase T6P levels, thereby promoting development of axillary branches (Tsai and Gazzarrini, 2014). Arabidopsis plants over-expressing TPP showed increased apical dominance. Plants lacking TPS activity develop slowly and are arrested at the torpedo stage (Schluepmann et al., 2003). Plants with reduced TPS activity and low T6P levels also showed delayed flowering (Wahl et al., 2013). Furthermore, T6P levels become elevated in plants that accumulate Suc and high levels of T6P inhibit SnRK1, a central regulator of growth and metabolism under low energy/sugar conditions (Ghillebert et al., 2011; Tsai and Gazzarrini, 2014). Low T6P levels signal a low sugar metabolic state, increasing SnRK1 activity and inhibiting the use of sugars for growth (Eastmond et al., 2003; Schluepmann et al., 2003).

Elevated expression of TPPI in phyB-1 buds relative to wild type at 6 DAP is not correlated with changes in expression of the sugar-responsive ASN1 and TPS-genes, because these genes show differential expression starting at 7 DAP (TPS11) or 8 DAP (ASN1, TPS5, TPS9). Expression of ASN1 is increased in buds of tiller inhibition tin mutant wheat and defoliated wild-type sorghum plants (Kebrom et al., 2012; Kebrom and Mullet, 2014). ASN1 expression is also elevated in darkness under conditions of low sugar status (Fujiki et al., 2001). Therefore, increased TPPI expression in phyB-1 buds at 6 DAP is more likely a consequence of reduced phyB-signaling. Increased trehalose phosphate phosphatase activity could reduce T6P levels, thereby contributing to bud growth inhibition and reducing the propensity of buds to undergo floral transition.

Gene Expression Associated with Induction of Dormancy in phyB-1 Buds

Induction of bud dormancy involves coordinated inhibition of growth of nascent leaves, roots, and other tissues; altered metabolism; and the creation of barriers to outgrowth. Previous studies have identified TB1 (BRC1), GT1, and MAX2 as key regulators that increase bud resistance to outgrowth (Kebrom et al., 2006, 2010; Whipple et al., 2011). These genes also help mediate bud growth inhibition caused by SL (Aguilar-Martínez et al., 2007; Finlayson, 2007; Braun et al., 2012). Elevated and differential expression of GT1 (approximately 3- to 5-fold from 6 to 8 DAP), TB1 (approximately 2- to 3-fold from 6 to 8 DAP), and MAX2 (2-fold at 8 DAP) was observed in phyB-1 buds in this study. Elevated expression of these genes in buds of phyB-1 plants is consistent with prior studies showing that TB1, MAX2, and GT1 expression is regulated by phyB-signaling (Kebrom et al., 2006; Shen et al., 2007; Finlayson et al., 2010; Kebrom et al., 2010; Whipple et al., 2011), and that demonstrated a role for these genes as inhibitors of bud outgrowth (Doebley et al., 1995, 1997; Stirnberg et al., 2002; Takeda et al., 2003; Aguilar-Martínez et al., 2007; Finlayson, 2007; Lewis et al., 2008; Whipple et al., 2011).

Reduced expression of sorghum genes homologous to HB1, WRKY, bZIP44, ENOD93, and ACCoxidase in buds of phyB-1 may also help coordinate growth arrest and the induction of bud dormancy. AtHB1 regulates increased hypocotyl growth in response to light signaling through PIF1 (Capella et al., 2015). ENOD93 genes are involved in nodule development, and these genes are expressed in vascular bundles as well as the epidermis (Bi et al., 2009; Yan et al., 2015). Decreased expression of ENOD93 may inhibit the development of the vascular system in phyB-1 buds. Seeds of Arabidopsis bZIP44 mutants germinate at a reduced rate and bZIP44 promotes germination by enhancing the expression of endo-beta-mannanase (AtMAN7) that softens tissues surrounding the embryo (Iglesias-Fernández et al., 2013). Therefore, down-regulation of bZIP44 in phyB-1 buds might lead to hardening of leaves surrounding axillary meristem. Decreased expression of genes encoding ACC oxidases may reduce the level of ethylene in phyB-1 buds. Because ethylene biosynthesis increases in growing young leaves and leaf primordia (Hunter et al., 1999), a low level of ethylene in the phyB-1 bud might be associated with suspension of the growth of leaf primordia and young leaves enclosing the bud meristem.

Transcriptome analysis indicated that cytokinin levels and expression of genes involved in CK-signaling are reduced in buds of phyB-1 plants. Higher expression of a gene encoding CKX1 in phyB-1 buds may reduce bud cytokinin levels since transgenic expression of cytokinin oxidases/dehydrogenase (CKX) reduces CK-levels (Werner et al., 2001; Galuszka et al., 2004). In addition, genes encoding several type-A response regulators (ARR3/6/9) were expressed at lower levels in phyB-1 compared to wild-type buds. CKs stimulate bud outgrowth in pea when directly applied to the bud (Pillay and Railton, 1983) and decapitation-induced bud outgrowth in chickpea was associated with an increase in the level of CKs (Turnbull et al., 1997). Therefore, reduced expression of genes involved in CK signaling in phyB-1 buds may increase resistance to bud outgrowth.

The transition of buds in phyB-1 into dormancy was associated with an increase in the expression of NAC-domain proteins and dormancy-associated auxin repressed/stress-related genes at 7/8 DAP (Fig. 7). The NAC domain-containing proteins are involved in the regulation of stress tolerance (Puranik et al., 2012). Inhibition of bud outgrowth by shade signals in Arabidopsis is associated with increased expression of genes involved in ABA biosynthesis/response in plants (González-Grandío et al., 2013; Reddy et al., 2013). Few genes in the ABA pathway were differentially expressed at 6 DAP. However, by 7/8 DAP, several genes involved in ABA metabolism and signaling were expressed at higher levels in buds of phyB-1 [ABI1, CYP707A4 (ABA 8′-hydroxylase), mediator of ABA-regulated dormancy1, HVA22, AtAF1, NCED3]. For example, expression of an AtAF1-like gene (Sb03g041920.2) that induces NCED3 expression (Jensen et al., 2013) increased approximately 19-fold in phyB-1 buds at 8 DAP (Fig. 8). Therefore, it is likely that ABA levels increase in phyB-1 buds at later stages of bud dormancy, consistent with prior studies showing a role for ABA in shade-induced bud dormancy (González-Grandío et al., 2013; Reddy et al., 2013).

Induction of Genes for SWEET Sugar Transport and cwINVs during Bud Outgrowth

The expression of genes encoding an MtN3/SWEET-transporter and cwINV was very low in phyB-1 and wild-type buds at 6 DAP, but strongly (>50-fold) and differentially increased in wild-type buds at 7/8 DAP. MtN3 encodes a SWEET transporter, a member of a family of Suc/sugar transporters that are involved in phloem sugar loading/unloading and efflux of sugars from maternal tissues for seed filling and pollen development (Chen et al., 2012; Guo et al., 2014; Chen et al., 2015). CwINVs cleave apoplastic Suc into Glc and Fru for import into cells (Sherson et al., 2003; Weschke et al., 2003). Increased expression of the SWEET transporter in the phloem could facilitate unloading of Suc into the apoplast where cwINVs generate Glc and Fru for uptake by developing buds. The increase in Suc transport and cleavage into Glc and Fru in the bud apoplast appears to be a key event in tiller development in wild-type plants. Apoplastic sugars provide feed-forward signaling to genes involved in the cell cycle, growth, and auxin signaling, and by increasing levels of T6P (Wang and Ruan, 2013). Increased expression of genes encoding an MtN3/SWEET transporter and cwINVs could increase the supply of sugars from the shoot for continued growth of buds of wild-type plants until growth can be sustained by tiller leaf photosynthesis.

Mechanisms that regulate expression of the SWEET-gene family are largely unknown (Chen et al., 2015). The expression of genes that encode cwINVs can be induced by sugar (Huang et al., 2007). Therefore, it is possible that increased cwINV gene expression is a consequence of increased sugars supplied by leaves and/or from elevated SWEET activity. The expression of cwINVs is also induced by cytokinins (Ehness and Roitsch, 1997). Changes in gene expression indicate that the level of cytokinin increases in wild-type buds between 6 DAPS and 8 DAP because the CK-responsive genes CGA1 and SHY2/IAA3 are induced in buds during this time frame (Supplemental Fig. S9). In Arabidopsis, cytokinin acting through ARR1 increases SHY/IAA3 expression in root meristems (Peng et al., 2013). Increased expression of CGA1 mediates activation of genes involved in chloroplast development in rice (Hudson et al., 2013). Genes involved in chloroplast development including several genes encoding LHCII show higher expression in buds of wild-type plants by 8 DAP, as would be expected after increased expression of CGA1 (data not shown). The lack of induction of genes encoding a SWEET-transporter and cwINVs in buds of phyB-1 could be caused by several factors including elevated expression of CKX1 that degrades CK, with lower expression of ARR3/6/9 response factors that may mediate CK-induced bud outgrowth (Supplemental Fig. S9; Müller et al., 2015).

In both phyB-1 and wild-type plants, initiation of axillary meristems and growth of axillary buds in the first leaf axils was similar until 6 DAP (Fig. 9). It is likely that the buds in both genotypes were supplied with sugars symplastically through plasmodesmata at least until 6 DAP. Lack of phyB-signaling in phyB-1 plants resulted in the many large differences in bud gene expression by 6 DAP compared to the wild-type that could contribute to coordinated growth cessation, increased protection of bud meristems from floral transition, increased barriers to outgrowth, and induction of bud dormancy. In contrast, buds of wild-type plants continued to grow and showed increased expression of genes encoding a SWEET transporter and cwINVs at 7 DAP. The timing of this change in gene expression is critical and occurs during a transition stage from 6 to 8 DAP where bud growth can still be inhibited by shading (Kebrom et al., 2006). We propose that during the transition stage, increased expression of the SWEET transporter and cwINV creates an apoplastic supply of sugar stimulating further bud development that enables the acquisition of photosynthetic capacity and escape from dormancy-inducing factors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Plant Materials and Growing Conditions

Seeds of phyB-1 (also known as 58M) and near-isogenic phytochrome B (PHYB; wild type, also known as 100M) were planted in flats containing cells filled with growing mix prepared from peat moss, vermiculite, and perlite and fertilizers as described in Beall et al. (1991). The seedlings were grown in a growth chamber using 14/10 h light/dark periods, 31°C/22°C day/night temperatures and 50% relative humidity. The length of the bud in the first leaf axil of phyB-1 and wild type was measured under a dissecting microscope at 6, 7, and 8 d after planting (DAP).

RNA-seq Library Preparation and Sequencing

RNA-seq library was prepared from RNA isolated from three biological replicates of phyB-1 and wild-type axillary buds at 6, 7, and 8 DAP. Total RNA was isolated from at least six axillary buds per sample using the TRIzol method (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). RNA-seq libraries were prepared using the TruSeq RNA Sample Prep Kit v2 (Illumina, San Diego, CA), following the recommended protocol. Briefly, mRNA was purified from 400-ng total RNA using poly-T oligo-attached magnetic beads. The mRNA was eluted, fragmented, and primed for cDNA synthesis. After first- and second-strand synthesis, the cDNA was end-repaired, adenylated, and unique adapters were ligated to each sample and the DNA fragments were amplified before sequencing. The quality of each RNA-seq library was assessed using a bioanalyzer and sequenced using HiSEquation 2500 (Illumina) at the TX A&M Genomics and Bioinformatics Services Center (College Station, TX).

RNA-seq Data Analysis and Bioinformatics

The sequence reads were aligned with the sorghum transcript sequence Sbicolor-v2.1_255 (Phytozome, http://www.phytozome.net) using the CLC Genomics Workbench (CLC, Aarhus, Denmark). The Sbicolor-v2.1_255 includes 33,032 genes and 39,441 transcripts. To identify differentially expressed genes, RNA-seq datasets were analyzed using the Edge statistical test in the CLC Main Workbench Ver. 7 (CLC). Genes differentially expressed in axillary buds of phyB-1 relative to the corresponding wild-type controls at 6, 7, and 8 DAP were determined using the following criteria: a false discovery rate ≤ 0.05, and reads per kilobase per million ≥ 2 in the three biological replicates of either phyB-1 and/or corresponding wild-type control. Genes deferentially expressed (up- or down-regulated) at 2-fold or higher were included in the analysis. The function of most of the genes was annotated using MapMan (http://mapman.gabipd.org) based on their homologs in Arabidopsis and rice.

Analysis of Gene Expression by Quantitative Real-Time PCR

To analyze the expression of genes by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR), cDNAs were prepared from 400 ng of total RNA from three independent biological replicates for each sample. The RNAs were treated with DNAse I, and cDNA was prepared using SuperScript III following the manufacturer’s protocol (Invitrogen). The cDNA was suspended in 320 μl water, and 2 μl was used in every qRT-PCR reaction. In addition to the cDNA template the qRT-PCR reaction included 2 μl of 250 ng primer pairs and 6 μl KiCqStart SYBR Green qRT-PCR Ready Mix (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). The 10-μl qRT-PCR reaction was run in duplicate on an ABI 7900HT (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). The average target cT (threshold cycle) values were normalized to 18S rRNA cT values. The fold change between two samples was calculated using the slightly modified −ΔΔCt method as described in Kebrom et al. (2010). The primers for sorghum ortholog of tb1 (SbTB1), SbMAX2, SbDRM1, SbPCNA, SbCycD2, SbCycB, and 18S rRNA used for qRT-PCR were published in Kebrom et al. (2010). The primers for SbGT1 were published by Whipple et al. (2011) and those for SbASN1 and SbPFP were published by Kebrom and Mullet (2014).

Accession Numbers

Supplemental Data

The following supplemental materials are available.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental Data

Glossary

ABA

abscisic acid

ARR

type-A response regulator

ASN

Suc-starvation-inducible Gln-dependent Asn synthase gene

CK

cytokinin

CKX, CKX

cytokinin oxidase/dehydrogenase

cwINV

cell wall invertase

DFL1

dwarf in light1

FDR

false discovery rate

FPF1

flowering promoting factor1

FR

far-red [light]

FT

FLOWERING LOCUS T

GA

gibberellin

gt1, GT1

grassy tillers1

LFY3

LEAFY3-like

NCED3

NINE-CIS-EPOXYCAROTENOID DIOXYGENASE3

Phy[A,B,C,D,E]

phytochrome [A,B,C,D,E]

qRT-PCR

quantitative real-time PCR

R

red [light]

RPKM

reads per kilobase per million

SAS

shade-avoidance syndrome

SL

strigolactone

SbTB1

sorghum ortholog of tb1

SAM

shoot apical meristem

tb1, TB1

teosinte branched1 gene

Tin

tiller inhibition mutant [of wheat]

References

  1. Aguilar-Martínez JA, Poza-Carrión C, Cubas P (2007) Arabidopsis BRANCHED1 acts as an integrator of branching signals within axillary buds. Plant Cell 19: 458–472 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aoyama T, Dong CH, Wu Y, Carabelli M, Sessa G, Ruberti I, Morelli G, Chua NH (1995) Ectopic expression of the Arabidopsis transcriptional activator Athb-1 alters leaf cell fate in tobacco. Plant Cell 7: 1773–1785 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ballaré CL, Scopel AL, Sánchez RA (1990) Far-red radiation reflected from adjacent leaves: an early signal of competition in plant canopies. Science 247: 329–332 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Barbier FF, Lunn JE, Beveridge CA (2015a) Ready, steady, go! A sugar hit starts the race to shoot branching. Curr Opin Plant Biol 25: 39–45 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Barbier F, Péron T, Lecerf M, Perez-Garcia MD, Barrière Q, Rolčík J, Boutet-Mercey S, Citerne S, Lemoine R, Porcheron B, Roman H, Leduc N, et al. (2015b) Sucrose is an early modulator of the key hormonal mechanisms controlling bud outgrowth in Rosa hybrida. J Exp Bot 66: 2569–2582 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Beall FD, Morgan PW, Mander LN, Miller FR, Babb KH (1991) Genetic regulation of development in Sorghum bicolor: V. The ma(3) allele results in gibberellin enrichment. Plant Physiol 95: 116–125 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bensmihen S, Rippa S, Lambert G, Jublot D, Pautot V, Granier F, Giraudat J, Parcy F (2002) The homologous ABI5 and EEL transcription factors function antagonistically to fine-tune gene expression during late embryogenesis. Plant Cell 14: 1391–1403 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Berckmans B, Vassileva V, Schmid SPC, Maes S, Parizot B, Naramoto S, Magyar Z, Alvim Kamei CL, Koncz C, Bögre L, Persiau G, De Jaeger G, et al. (2011) Auxin-dependent cell cycle reactivation through transcriptional regulation of Arabidopsis E2Fa by lateral organ boundary proteins. Plant Cell 23: 3671–3683 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Beveridge CA, Dun EA, Rameau C (2009) Pea has its tendrils in branching discoveries spanning a century from auxin to strigolactones. Plant Physiol 151: 985–990 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bi YM, Kant S, Clarke J, Gidda S, Ming F, Xu J, Rochon A, Shelp BJ, Hao L, Zhao R, Mullen RT, Zhu T, et al. (2009) Increased nitrogen-use efficiency in transgenic rice plants over-expressing a nitrogen-responsive early nodulin gene identified from rice expression profiling. Plant Cell Environ 32: 1749–1760 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Blázquez MA, Weigel D (1999) Independent regulation of flowering by phytochrome B and gibberellins in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 120: 1025–1032 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Bolduc N, Hake S (2009) The maize transcription factor KNOTTED1 directly regulates the gibberellin catabolism gene ga2ox1. Plant Cell 21: 1647–1658 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Borrell AK, van Oosterom EJ, Mullet JE, George-Jaeggli B, Jordan DR, Klein PE, Hammer GL (2014) Stay-green alleles individually enhance grain yield in sorghum under drought by modifying canopy development and water uptake patterns. New Phytol 203: 817–830 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Bradley D, Carpenter R, Copsey L, Vincent C, Rothstein S, Coen E (1996) Control of inflorescence architecture in Antirrhinum. Nature 379: 791–797 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Braun N, de Saint Germain A, Pillot JP, Boutet-Mercey S, Dalmais M, Antoniadi I, Li X, Maia-Grondard A, Le Signor C, Bouteiller N, Luo D, Bendahmane A, et al. (2012) The pea TCP transcription factor PsBRC1 acts downstream of Strigolactones to control shoot branching. Plant Physiol 158: 225–238 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Capella M, Ribone PA, Arce AL, Chan RL (2015) Arabidopsis thaliana HomeoBox 1 (AtHB1), a Homedomain-Leucine Zipper I (HD-Zip I) transcription factor, is regulated by PHYTOCHROME-INTERACTING FACTOR 1 to promote hypocotyl elongation. New Phytol 207: 669–682 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Carabelli M, Possenti M, Sessa G, Ciolfi A, Sassi M, Morelli G, Ruberti I (2007) Canopy shade causes a rapid and transient arrest in leaf development through auxin-induced cytokinin oxidase activity. Genes Dev 21: 1863–1868 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Carabelli M, Sessa G, Baima S, Morelli G, Ruberti I (1993) The Arabidopsis Athb-2 and -4 genes are strongly induced by far-red-rich light. Plant J 4: 469–479 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Casal JJ. (2013) Photoreceptor signaling networks in plant responses to shade. Annu Rev Plant Biol 64: 403–427 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Cerdán PD, Chory J (2003) Regulation of flowering time by light quality. Nature 423: 881–885 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Chatfield SP, Stirnberg P, Forde BG, Leyser O (2000) The hormonal regulation of axillary bud growth in Arabidopsis. Plant J 24: 159–169 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Chen LQ, Cheung LS, Feng L, Tanner W, Frommer WB (2015) Transport of sugars. Annu Rev Biochem 84: 865–894 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Chen LQ, Qu XQ, Hou BH, Sosso D, Osorio S, Fernie AR, Frommer WB (2012) Sucrose efflux mediated by SWEET proteins as a key step for phloem transport. Science 335: 207–211 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Chiang YH, Zubo YO, Tapken W, Kim HJ, Lavanway AM, Howard L, Pilon M, Kieber JJ, Schaller GE (2012) Functional characterization of the GATA transcription factors GNC and CGA1 reveals their key role in chloroplast development, growth, and division in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 160: 332–348 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Childs KL, Miller FR, Cordonnier-Pratt MM, Pratt LH, Morgan PW, Mullet JE (1997) The sorghum photoperiod sensitivity gene, Ma3, encodes a phytochrome B. Plant Physiol 113: 611–619 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Cho E, Zambryski PC (2011) Organ boundary1 defines a gene expressed at the junction between the shoot apical meristem and lateral organs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108: 2154–2159 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Choubane D, Rabot A, Mortreau E, Legourrierec J, Péron T, Foucher F, Ahcène Y, Pelleschi-Travier S, Leduc N, Hamama L, Sakr S (2012) Photocontrol of bud burst involves gibberellin biosynthesis in Rosa sp. J Plant Physiol 169: 1271–1280 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Clack T, Mathews S, Sharrock RA (1994) The phytochrome apoprotein family in Arabidopsis is encoded by five genes: the sequences and expression of PHYD and PHYE. Plant Mol Biol 25: 413–427 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Claeys H, De Bodt S, Inzé D (2014) Gibberellins and DELLAs: central nodes in growth regulatory networks. Trends Plant Sci 19: 231–239 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Conti L, Bradley D (2007) TERMINAL FLOWER1 is a mobile signal controlling Arabidopsis architecture. Plant Cell 19: 767–778 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Crawford S, Shinohara N, Sieberer T, Williamson L, George G, Hepworth J, Müller D, Domagalska MA, Leyser O (2010) Strigolactones enhance competition between shoot branches by dampening auxin transport. Development 137: 2905–2913 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. D’Agostino IB, Deruère J, Kieber JJ (2000) Characterization of the response of the Arabidopsis response regulator gene family to cytokinin. Plant Physiol 124: 1706–1717 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Danilevskaya ON, Meng X, Ananiev EV (2010) Concerted modification of flowering time and inflorescence architecture by ectopic expression of TFL1-like genes in maize. Plant Physiol 153: 238–251 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Delatte TL, Sedijani P, Kondou Y, Matsui M, de Jong GJ, Somsen GW, Wiese-Klinkenberg A, Primavesi LF, Paul MJ, Schluepmann H (2011) Growth arrest by trehalose-6-phosphate: an astonishing case of primary metabolite control over growth by way of the SnRK1 signaling pathway. Plant Physiol 157: 160–174 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Dello Ioio R, Nakamura K, Moubayidin L, Perilli S, Taniguchi M, Morita MT, Aoyama T, Costantino P, Sabatini S (2008) A genetic framework for the control of cell division and differentiation in the root meristem. Science 322: 1380–1384 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. de Lucas M, Davière JM, Rodríguez-Falcón M, Pontin M, Iglesias-Pedraz JM, Lorrain S, Fankhauser C, Blázquez MA, Titarenko E, Prat S (2008) A molecular framework for light and gibberellin control of cell elongation. Nature 451: 480–484 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Devitt ML, Stafstrom JP (1995) Cell cycle regulation during growth-dormancy cycles in pea axillary buds. Plant Mol Biol 29: 255–265 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Dewet JMJ, Huckabay JP (1967) Origin of Sorghum bicolor. 2. Distribution and domestication. Evolution 21: 787–802 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Dick R, Rattei T, Haslbeck M, Schwab W, Gierl A, Frey M (2012) Comparative analysis of benzoxazinoid biosynthesis in monocots and dicots: independent recruitment of stabilization and activation functions. Plant Cell 24: 915–928 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Doebley J, Stec A, Gustus C (1995) teosinte branched1 and the origin of maize: evidence for epistasis and the evolution of dominance. Genetics 141: 333–346 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Doebley J, Stec A, Hubbard L (1997) The evolution of apical dominance in maize. Nature 386: 485–488 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Domagalska MA, Leyser O (2011) Signal integration in the control of shoot branching. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 12: 211–221 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Drewry DT, Kumar P, Long SP (2014) Simultaneous improvement in productivity, water use, and albedo through crop structural modification. Glob Change Biol 20: 1955–1967 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Dun EA, Ferguson BJ, Beveridge CA (2006) Apical dominance and shoot branching. Divergent opinions or divergent mechanisms? Plant Physiol 142: 812–819 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Eastmond PJ, Li Y, Graham IA (2003) Is trehalose-6-phosphate a regulator of sugar metabolism in plants? J Exp Bot 54: 533–537 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Ehness R, Roitsch T (1997) Co-ordinated induction of mRNAs for extracellular invertase and a glucose transporter in Chenopodium rubrum by cytokinins. Plant J 11: 539–548 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Eisenhaber F, Wechselberger C, Kreil G (2001) The Brix domain protein family—a key to the ribosomal biogenesis pathway? Trends Biochem Sci 26: 345–347 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Espinosa-Ruiz A, Saxena S, Schmidt J, Mellerowicz E, Miskolczi P, Bakó L, Bhalerao RP (2004) Differential stage-specific regulation of cyclin-dependent kinases during cambial dormancy in hybrid aspen. Plant J 38: 603–615 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Evers JB, Vos J, Andrieu B, Struik PC (2006) Cessation of tillering in spring wheat in relation to light interception and red:far-red ratio. Ann Bot (Lond) 97: 649–658 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Finlayson SA. (2007) Arabidopsis Teosinte Branched1-like 1 regulates axillary bud outgrowth and is homologous to monocot Teosinte Branched1. Plant Cell Physiol 48: 667–677 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Finlayson SA, Krishnareddy SR, Kebrom TH, Casal JJ (2010) Phytochrome regulation of branching in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 152: 1914–1927 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Finlayson SA, Lee IJ, Mullet JE, Morgan PW (1999) The mechanism of rhythmic ethylene production in sorghum. The role of phytochrome B and simulated shading. Plant Physiol 119: 1083–1089 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Franklin KA, Whitelam GC (2005) Phytochromes and shade-avoidance responses in plants. Ann Bot (Lond) 96: 169–175 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Frey M, Chomet P, Glawischnig E, Stettner C, Grün S, Winklmair A, Eisenreich W, Bacher A, Meeley RB, Briggs SP, Simcox K, Gierl A (1997) Analysis of a chemical plant defense mechanism in grasses. Science 277: 696–699 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Fujiki Y, Yoshikawa Y, Sato T, Inada N, Ito M, Nishida I, Watanabe A (2001) Dark-inducible genes from Arabidopsis thaliana are associated with leaf senescence and repressed by sugars. Physiol Plant 111: 345–352 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Galuszka P, Frébortová J, Werner T, Yamada M, Strnad M, Schmülling T, Frébort I (2004) Cytokinin oxidase/dehydrogenase genes in barley and wheat: cloning and heterologous expression. Eur J Biochem 271: 3990–4002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Ghillebert R, Swinnen E, Wen J, Vandesteene L, Ramon M, Norga K, Rolland F, Winderickx J (2011) The AMPK/SNF1/SnRK1 fuel gauge and energy regulator: structure, function and regulation. FEBS J 278: 3978–3990 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. González-Grandío E, Poza-Carrión C, Sorzano CO, Cubas P (2013) BRANCHED1 promotes axillary bud dormancy in response to shade in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 25: 834–850 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Gosti F, Beaudoin N, Serizet C, Webb AA, Vartanian N, Giraudat J (1999) ABI1 protein phosphatase 2C is a negative regulator of abscisic acid signaling. Plant Cell 11: 1897–1910 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Guo WJ, Nagy R, Chen HY, Pfrunder S, Yu YC, Santelia D, Frommer WB, Martinoia E (2014) SWEET17, a facilitative transporter, mediates fructose transport across the tonoplast of Arabidopsis roots and leaves. Plant Physiol 164: 777–789 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Guo Y, Gan S (2006) AtNAP, a NAC family transcription factor, has an important role in leaf senescence. Plant J 46: 601–612 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Hartmann U, Höhmann S, Nettesheim K, Wisman E, Saedler H, Huijser P (2000) Molecular cloning of SVP: a negative regulator of the floral transition in Arabidopsis. Plant J 21: 351–360 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Hay RKM, Kirby EJM (1991) Convergence and synchrony—a review of the coordination of development in wheat. Aust J Agric Res 42: 661–700 [Google Scholar]
  64. He Y, Gan S (2004) A novel zinc-finger protein with a proline-rich domain mediates ABA-regulated seed dormancy in Arabidopsis. Plant Mol Biol 54: 1–9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Henry C, Bledsoe SW, Siekman A, Kollman A, Waters BM, Feil R, Stitt M, Lagrimini LM (2014) The trehalose pathway in maize: conservation and gene regulation in response to the diurnal cycle and extended darkness. J Exp Bot 65: 5959–5973 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Hillwig MS, Contento AL, Meyer A, Ebany D, Bassham DC, Macintosh GC (2011) RNS2, a conserved member of the RNase T2 family, is necessary for ribosomal RNA decay in plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108: 1093–1098 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Hisamatsu T, King RW, Helliwell CA, Koshioka M (2005) The involvement of gibberellin 20-oxidase genes in phytochrome-regulated petiole elongation of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 138: 1106–1116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Holmes MG, Smith H (1975) Function of phytochrome in plants growing in natural-environment. Nature 254: 512–514 [Google Scholar]
  69. Huang LF, Bocock PN, Davis JM, Koch KE (2007) Regulation of invertase: a suite of transcriptional and post-transcriptional mechanisms. Funct Plant Biol 34: 499–507 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Hubbard L, McSteen P, Doebley J, Hake S (2002) Expression patterns and mutant phenotype of teosinte branched1 correlate with growth suppression in maize and teosinte. Genetics 162: 1927–1935 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Hudson D, Guevara DR, Hand AJ, Xu Z, Hao L, Chen X, Zhu T, Bi YM, Rothstein SJ (2013) Rice cytokinin GATA transcription factor1 regulates chloroplast development and plant architecture. Plant Physiol 162: 132–144 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Hunter DA, Yoo SD, Butcher SM, McManus MT (1999) Expression of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate oxidase during leaf ontogeny in white clover. Plant Physiol 120: 131–142 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Iglesias-Fernández R, Barrero-Sicilia C, Carrillo-Barral N, Oñate-Sánchez L, Carbonero P (2013) Arabidopsis thaliana bZIP44: a transcription factor affecting seed germination and expression of the mannanase-encoding gene AtMAN7. Plant J 74: 767–780 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Inzé D, De Veylder L (2006) Cell cycle regulation in plant development. Annu Rev Genet 40: 77–105 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Ishikawa S, Maekawa M, Arite T, Onishi K, Takamure I, Kyozuka J (2005) Suppression of tiller bud activity in tillering dwarf mutants of rice. Plant Cell Physiol 46: 79–86 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Islam TMT, Sedgley RH (1981) Evidence for a uniculm effect in spring wheat (Triticum-Aestivum L) in a mediterranean environment. Euphytica 30: 277–282 [Google Scholar]
  77. Janssen BJ, Drummond RS, Snowden KC (2014) Regulation of axillary shoot development. Curr Opin Plant Biol 17: 28–35 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Jasinski S, Piazza P, Craft J, Hay A, Woolley L, Rieu I, Phillips A, Hedden P, Tsiantis M (2005) KNOX action in Arabidopsis is mediated by coordinate regulation of cytokinin and gibberellin activities. Curr Biol 15: 1560–1565 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Jensen MK, Lindemose S, de Masi F, Reimer JJ, Nielsen M, Perera V, Workman CT, Turck F, Grant MR, Mundy J, Petersen M, Skriver K (2013) ATAF1 transcription factor directly regulates abscisic acid biosynthetic gene NCED3 in Arabidopsis thaliana. FEBS Open Bio 3: 321–327 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Johnson X, Brcich T, Dun EA, Goussot M, Haurogné K, Beveridge CA, Rameau C (2006) Branching genes are conserved across species. Genes controlling a novel signal in pea are coregulated by other long-distance signals. Plant Physiol 142: 1014–1026 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Kania T, Russenberger D, Peng S, Apel K, Melzer S (1997) FPF1 promotes flowering in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 9: 1327–1338 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Karlgren A, Gyllenstrand N, Källman T, Sundström JF, Moore D, Lascoux M, Lagercrantz U (2011) Evolution of the PEBP gene family in plants: functional diversification in seed plant evolution. Plant Physiol 156: 1967–1977 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Kebrom TH, Brutnell TP (2007) The molecular analysis of the shade avoidance syndrome in the grasses has begun. J Exp Bot 58: 3079–3089 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Kebrom TH, Brutnell TP, Finlayson SA (2010) Suppression of sorghum axillary bud outgrowth by shade, phyB and defoliation signalling pathways. Plant Cell Environ 33: 48–58 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Kebrom TH, Burson BL, Finlayson SA (2006) Phytochrome B represses Teosinte Branched1 expression and induces sorghum axillary bud outgrowth in response to light signals. Plant Physiol 140: 1109–1117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Kebrom TH, Chandler PM, Swain SM, King RW, Richards RA, Spielmeyer W (2012) Inhibition of tiller bud outgrowth in the tin mutant of wheat is associated with precocious internode development. Plant Physiol 160: 308–318 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Kebrom TH, Mullet JE (2014) Photosynthetic leaf area modulates tiller bud outgrowth in sorghum. Plant Cell Environ 38: 1471–1478 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Kebrom TH, Richards RA (2013) Physiological perspectives of reduced tillering and stunting in the tiller inhibition (tin) mutant of wheat. Funct Plant Biol 40: 977–985 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Kebrom TH, Spielmeyer W, Finnegan EJ (2013) Grasses provide new insights into regulation of shoot branching. Trends Plant Sci 18: 41–48 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Kim SY, Yu X, Michaels SD (2008) Regulation of CONSTANS and FLOWERING LOCUS T expression in response to changing light quality. Plant Physiol 148: 269–279 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Lee IJ, Foster KR, Morgan PW (1998) Photoperiod control of gibberellin levels and flowering in sorghum. Plant Physiol 116: 1003–1011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Lewis JM, Mackintosh CA, Shin S, Gilding E, Kravchenko S, Baldridge G, Zeyen R, Muehlbauer GJ (2008) Overexpression of the maize Teosinte Branched1 gene in wheat suppresses tiller development. Plant Cell Rep 27: 1217–1225 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Leydecker MT, Moureaux T, Kraepiel Y, Schnorr K, Caboche M (1995) Molybdenum cofactor mutants, specifically impaired in xanthine dehydrogenase activity and abscisic acid biosynthesis, simultaneously overexpress nitrate reductase. Plant Physiol 107: 1427–1431 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Li Y, Jing Y, Li J, Xu G, Lin R (2014) Arabidopsis VQ MOTIF-CONTAINING PROTEIN29 represses seedling deetiolation by interacting with PHYTOCHROME-INTERACTING FACTOR1. Plant Physiol 164: 2068–2080 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Lifschitz E, Ayre BG, Eshed Y (2014) Florigen and anti-florigen—a systemic mechanism for coordinating growth and termination in flowering plants. Front Plant Sci 5: 465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Lo SF, Yang SY, Chen KT, Hsing YI, Zeevaart JA, Chen LJ, Yu SM (2008) A novel class of gibberellin 2-oxidases control semidwarfism, tillering, and root development in rice. Plant Cell 20: 2603–2618 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Lopez-Molina L, Mongrand S, Chua NH (2001) A postgermination developmental arrest checkpoint is mediated by abscisic acid and requires the ABI5 transcription factor in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98: 4782–4787 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Lunn JE, Delorge I, Figueroa CM, van Dijck P, Stitt M (2014) Trehalose metabolism in plants. Plant J 79: 544–567 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. MacIntosh GC, Hillwig MS, Meyer A, Flagel L (2010) RNase T2 genes from rice and the evolution of secretory ribonucleases in plants. Mol Genet Genomics 283: 381–396 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Magyar Z, Horváth B, Khan S, Mohammed B, Henriques R, De Veylder L, Bakó L, Scheres B, Bögre L (2012) Arabidopsis E2FA stimulates proliferation and endocycle separately through RBR-bound and RBR-free complexes. EMBO J 31: 1480–1493 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Martinez-Garcia JF, Galstyan A, Salla-Martret M, Cifuentes-Esquivel N, Gallemi M, Bou-Torrent J (2010) Regulatory components of shade avoidance syndrome. Adv Bot Res 53: 65–116 [Google Scholar]
  102. Mason MG, Ross JJ, Babst BA, Wienclaw BN, Beveridge CA (2014) Sugar demand, not auxin, is the initial regulator of apical dominance. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111: 6092–6097 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Mathews S, Sharrock RA (1996) The phytochrome gene family in grasses (Poaceae): a phylogeny and evidence that grasses have a subset of the loci found in dicot angiosperms. Mol Biol Evol 13: 1141–1150 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Mauriat M, Sandberg LG, Moritz T (2011) Proper gibberellin localization in vascular tissue is required to control auxin-dependent leaf development and bud outgrowth in hybrid aspen. Plant J 67: 805–816 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Migeon JC, Garfinkel MS, Edgar BA (1999) Cloning and characterization of peter pan, a novel Drosophila gene required for larval growth. Mol Biol Cell 10: 1733–1744 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Minakuchi K, Kameoka H, Yasuno N, Umehara M, Luo L, Kobayashi K, Hanada A, Ueno K, Asami T, Yamaguchi S, Kyozuka J (2010) FINE CULM1 (FC1) works downstream of strigolactones to inhibit the outgrowth of axillary buds in rice. Plant Cell Physiol 51: 1127–1135 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Morelli G, Ruberti I (2000) Shade avoidance responses. Driving auxin along lateral routes. Plant Physiol 122: 621–626 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Müller D, Leyser O (2011) Auxin, cytokinin and the control of shoot branching. Ann Bot (Lond) 107: 1203–1212 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Müller D, Waldie T, Miyawaki K, To JP, Melnyk CW, Kieber JJ, Kakimoto T, Leyser O (2015) Cytokinin is required for escape but not release from auxin mediated apical dominance. Plant J 82: 874–886 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Murphy RL, Klein RR, Morishige DT, Brady JA, Rooney WL, Miller FR, Dugas DV, Klein PE, Mullet JE (2011) Coincident light and clock regulation of pseudoresponse regulator protein 37 (PRR37) controls photoperiodic flowering in sorghum. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108: 16469–16474 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Nakazawa M, Yabe N, Ichikawa T, Yamamoto YY, Yoshizumi T, Hasunuma K, Matsui M (2001) DFL1, an auxin-responsive GH3 gene homologue, negatively regulates shoot cell elongation and lateral root formation, and positively regulates the light response of hypocotyl length. Plant J 25: 213–221 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Ni J, Gao C, Chen MS, Pan BZ, Ye K, Xu ZF (2015) Gibberellin promotes shoot branching in the perennial woody plant Jatropha curcas. Plant Cell Physiol 56: 1655–1666 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Okumoto S, Koch W, Tegeder M, Fischer WN, Biehl A, Leister D, Stierhof YD, Frommer WB (2004) Root phloem-specific expression of the plasma membrane amino acid proton co-transporter AAP3. J Exp Bot 55: 2155–2168 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  114. Olson SN, Ritter K, Rooney W, Kemanian A, McCarl BA, Zhang YQ, Hall S, Packer D, Mullet J (2012) High biomass yield energy sorghum: developing a genetic model for C4 grass bioenergy crops. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefining Biofpr 6: 640–655 [Google Scholar]
  115. Peng Y, Chen L, Lu Y, Ma W, Tong Y, Li Y (2013) DAR2 acts as an important node connecting cytokinin, auxin, SHY2 and PLT1/2 in root meristem size control. Plant Signal Behav 8: e24226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  116. Pfister AS, Keil M, Kühl M (2015) The Wnt target protein Peter Pan defines a novel p53-independent nucleolar stress-response pathway. J Biol Chem 290: 10905–10918 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  117. Pillay I, Railton ID (1983) Complete release of axillary buds from apical dominance in intact, light-grown seedlings of Pisum sativum L. following a single application of cytokinin. Plant Physiol 71: 972–974 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  118. Pnueli L, Carmel-Goren L, Hareven D, Gutfinger T, Alvarez J, Ganal M, Zamir D, Lifschitz E (1998) The SELF-PRUNING gene of tomato regulates vegetative to reproductive switching of sympodial meristems and is the ortholog of CEN and TFL1. Development 125: 1979–1989 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  119. Puranik S, Sahu PP, Srivastava PS, Prasad M (2012) NAC proteins: regulation and role in stress tolerance. Trends Plant Sci 17: 369–381 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  120. Rabot A, Henry C, Ben Baaziz K, Mortreau E, Azri W, Lothier J, Hamama L, Boummaza R, Leduc N, Pelleschi-Travier S, Le Gourrierec J, Sakr S (2012) Insight into the role of sugars in bud burst under light in the rose. Plant Cell Physiol 53: 1068–1082 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  121. Reddy SK, Holalu SV, Casal JJ, Finlayson SA (2013) Abscisic acid regulates axillary bud outgrowth responses to the ratio of red to far-red light. Plant Physiol 163: 1047–1058 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  122. Reed JW, Nagpal P, Poole DS, Furuya M, Chory J (1993) Mutations in the gene for the red/far-red light receptor phytochrome B alter cell elongation and physiological responses throughout Arabidopsis development. Plant Cell 5: 147–157 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  123. Rohde A, Bhalerao RP (2007) Plant dormancy in the perennial context. Trends Plant Sci 12: 217–223 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  124. Rolland F, Baena-Gonzalez E, Sheen J (2006) Sugar sensing and signaling in plants: conserved and novel mechanisms. Annu Rev Plant Biol 57: 675–709 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  125. Rood SB, Williams PH, Pearce D, Murofushi N, Mander LN, Pharis RP (1990) A mutant gene that increases gibberellin production in brassica. Plant Physiol 93: 1168–1174 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  126. Rossignol P, Stevens R, Perennes C, Jasinski S, Cella R, Tremousaygue D, Bergounioux C (2002) AtE2F-a and AtDP-a, members of the E2F family of transcription factors, induce Arabidopsis leaf cells to re-enter S phase. Mol Genet Genomics 266: 995–1003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  127. Ruan YL. (2014) Sucrose metabolism: gateway to diverse carbon use and sugar signaling. Annu Rev Plant Biol 65: 33–67 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  128. Sakamoto T, Kobayashi M, Itoh H, Tagiri A, Kayano T, Tanaka H, Iwahori S, Matsuoka M (2001) Expression of a gibberellin 2-oxidase gene around the shoot apex is related to phase transition in rice. Plant Physiol 125: 1508–1516 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  129. Satoh-Nagasawa N, Nagasawa N, Malcomber S, Sakai H, Jackson D (2006) A trehalose metabolic enzyme controls inflorescence architecture in maize. Nature 441: 227–230 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  130. Schluepmann H, Pellny T, van Dijken A, Smeekens S, Paul M (2003) Trehalose 6-phosphate is indispensable for carbohydrate utilization and growth in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 6849–6854 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  131. Seo M, Peeters AJM, Koiwai H, Oritani T, Marion-Poll A, Zeevaart JAD, Koornneef M, Kamiya Y, Koshiba T (2000) The Arabidopsis aldehyde oxidase 3 (AAO3) gene product catalyzes the final step in abscisic acid biosynthesis in leaves. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97: 12908–12913 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  132. Sharrock RA, Quail PH (1989) Novel phytochrome sequences in Arabidopsis thaliana: structure, evolution, and differential expression of a plant regulatory photoreceptor family. Genes Dev 3: 1745–1757 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  133. Sheehan MJ, Kennedy LM, Costich DE, Brutnell TP (2007) Subfunctionalization of PhyB1 and PhyB2 in the control of seedling and mature plant traits in maize. Plant J 49: 338–353 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  134. Shen H, Luong P, Huq E (2007) The F-box protein MAX2 functions as a positive regulator of photomorphogenesis in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 145: 1471–1483 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  135. Shen Q, Chen CN, Brands A, Pan SM, Ho TH (2001) The stress- and abscisic acid-induced barley gene HVA22: developmental regulation and homologues in diverse organisms. Plant Mol Biol 45: 327–340 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  136. Sherson SM, Alford HL, Forbes SM, Wallace G, Smith SM (2003) Roles of cell-wall invertases and monosaccharide transporters in the growth and development of Arabidopsis. J Exp Bot 54: 525–531 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  137. Shimizu-Sato S, Mori H (2001) Control of outgrowth and dormancy in axillary buds. Plant Physiol 127: 1405–1413 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  138. Smith H. (1995) Physiological and ecological function within the phytochrome family. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 46: 289–315 [Google Scholar]
  139. Smith H, Whitelam GC (1997) The shade avoidance syndrome: multiple responses mediated by multiple phytochromes. Plant Cell Environ 20: 840–844 [Google Scholar]
  140. Song S, Dai X, Zhang WH (2012) A rice F-box gene, OsFbx352, is involved in glucose-delayed seed germination in rice. J Exp Bot 63: 5559–5568 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  141. Stirnberg P, Furner IJ, Ottoline Leyser HM (2007) MAX2 participates in an SCF complex which acts locally at the node to suppress shoot branching. Plant J 50: 80–94 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  142. Stirnberg P, van de Sande K, Leyser HMO (2002) MAX1 and MAX2 control shoot lateral branching in Arabidopsis. Development 129: 1131–1141 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  143. Sun TP. (2008) Gibberellin metabolism, perception and signaling pathways in Arabidopsis. Arabidopsis Book 6: e0103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  144. Takeda T, Suwa Y, Suzuki M, Kitano H, Ueguchi-Tanaka M, Ashikari M, Matsuoka M, Ueguchi C (2003) The OsTB1 gene negatively regulates lateral branching in rice. Plant J 33: 513–520 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  145. Tanaka M, Takei K, Kojima M, Sakakibara H, Mori H (2006) Auxin controls local cytokinin biosynthesis in the nodal stem in apical dominance. Plant J 45: 1028–1036 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  146. Tao Y, Ferrer JL, Ljung K, Pojer F, Hong F, Long JA, Li L, Moreno JE, Bowman ME, Ivans LJ, Cheng Y, Lim J, et al. (2008) Rapid synthesis of auxin via a new tryptophan-dependent pathway is required for shade avoidance in plants. Cell 133: 164–176 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  147. Tatematsu K, Ward S, Leyser O, Kamiya Y, Nambara E (2005) Identification of cis-elements that regulate gene expression during initiation of axillary bud outgrowth in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 138: 757–766 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  148. Tecza A, Bugner V, Kühl M, Kühl SJ (2011) Pescadillo homologue 1 and Peter Pan function during Xenopus laevis pronephros development. Biol Cell 103: 483–498 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  149. Thimm O, Bläsing O, Gibon Y, Nagel A, Meyer S, Krüger P, Selbig J, Müller LA, Rhee SY, Stitt M (2004) MAPMAN: a user-driven tool to display genomics data sets onto diagrams of metabolic pathways and other biological processes. Plant J 37: 914–939 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  150. Truong SK, McCormick RF, Rooney WL, Mullet JE (2015) Harnessing genetic variation in leaf angle to increase productivity of Sorghum bicolor. Genetics 201: 1229–1238 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  151. Tsai AY, Gazzarrini S (2014) Trehalose-6-phosphate and SnRK1 kinases in plant development and signaling: the emerging picture. Front Plant Sci 5: 119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  152. Turnbull CGN, Raymond MAA, Dodd IC, Morris SE (1997) Rapid increases in cytokinin concentration in lateral buds of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L) during release of apical dominance. Planta 202: 271–276 [Google Scholar]
  153. Ubeda-Tomas S, Bennett MJ (2010) Plant development: size matters, and it’s all down to hormones. Curr Biol 20: R511–R513 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  154. Ufaz S, Shukla V, Soloveichik Y, Golan Y, Breuer F, Koncz Z, Galili G, Koncz C, Zilberstein A (2011) Transcriptional control of aspartate kinase expression during darkness and sugar depletion in Arabidopsis: involvement of bZIP transcription factors. Planta 233: 1025–1040 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  155. van Dijken AJ, Schluepmann H, Smeekens SC (2004) Arabidopsis trehalose-6-phosphate synthase 1 is essential for normal vegetative growth and transition to flowering. Plant Physiol 135: 969–977 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  156. Vandesteene L, López-Galvis L, Vanneste K, Feil R, Maere S, Lammens W, Rolland F, Lunn JE, Avonce N, Beeckman T, van Dijck P (2012) Expansive evolution of the trehalose-6-phosphate phosphatase gene family in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 160: 884–896 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  157. Vega-Arreguín JC, Ibarra-Laclette E, Jiménez-Moraila B, Martínez O, Vielle-Calzada JP, Herrera-Estrella L, Herrera-Estrella A (2009) Deep sampling of the Palomero maize transcriptome by a high throughput strategy of pyrosequencing. BMC Genomics 10: 299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  158. Wahl V, Ponnu J, Schlereth A, Arrivault S, Langenecker T, Franke A, Feil R, Lunn JE, Stitt M, Schmid M (2013) Regulation of flowering by trehalose-6-phosphate signaling in Arabidopsis thaliana. Science 339: 704–707 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  159. Wang A, Garcia D, Zhang H, Feng K, Chaudhury A, Berger F, Peacock WJ, Dennis ES, Luo M (2010) The VQ motif protein IKU1 regulates endosperm growth and seed size in Arabidopsis. Plant J 63: 670–679 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  160. Wang H, Wang H (2015) Phytochrome signaling: time to tighten up the loose ends. Mol Plant 8: 540–551 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  161. Wang L, Ruan YL (2013) Regulation of cell division and expansion by sugar and auxin signaling. Front Plant Sci 4: 163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  162. Wang R, Albani MC, Vincent C, Bergonzi S, Luan M, Bai Y, Kiefer C, Castillo R, Coupland G (2011) Aa TFL1 confers an age-dependent response to vernalization in perennial Arabis alpina. Plant Cell 23: 1307–1321 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  163. Ward SP, Leyser O (2004) Shoot branching. Curr Opin Plant Biol 7: 73–78 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  164. Werner T, Motyka V, Strnad M, Schmülling T (2001) Regulation of plant growth by cytokinin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98: 10487–10492 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  165. Weschke W, Panitz R, Gubatz S, Wang Q, Radchuk R, Weber H, Wobus U (2003) The role of invertases and hexose transporters in controlling sugar ratios in maternal and filial tissues of barley caryopses during early development. Plant J 33: 395–411 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  166. Weyhe M, Eschen-Lippold L, Pecher P, Scheel D, Lee J (2014) Menage a trois: the complex relationships between mitogen-activated protein kinases, WRKY transcription factors and VQ-motif-containing proteins. Plant Signal Behav 2014 Jan 1;9. pii: e29519. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  167. Whipple CJ, Kebrom TH, Weber AL, Yang F, Hall D, Meeley R, Schmidt R, Doebley J, Brutnell TP, Jackson DP (2011) Grassy tillers1 promotes apical dominance in maize and responds to shade signals in the grasses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108: E506–E512 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  168. Xu G, Ma H, Nei M, Kong H (2009) Evolution of F-box genes in plants: different modes of sequence divergence and their relationships with functional diversification. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 835–840 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  169. Xu H, Liu Q, Yao T, Fu X (2014) Shedding light on integrative GA signaling. Curr Opin Plant Biol 21: 89–95 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  170. Yadav UP, Ivakov A, Feil R, Duan GY, Walther D, Giavalisco P, Piques M, Carillo P, Hubberten HM, Stitt M, Lunn JE (2014) The sucrose-trehalose 6-phosphate (Tre6P) nexus: specificity and mechanisms of sucrose signalling by Tre6P. J Exp Bot 65: 1051–1068 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  171. Yan Z, Hossain MS, Arikit S, Valdés-López O, Zhai J, Wang J, Libault M, Ji T, Qiu L, Meyers BC, Stacey G (2015) Identification of microRNAs and their mRNA targets during soybean nodule development: functional analysis of the role of miR393j-3p in soybean nodulation. New Phytol 207: 748–759 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  172. Yang CY, Hsu FC, Li JP, Wang NN, Shih MC (2011) The AP2/ERF transcription factor AtERF73/HRE1 modulates ethylene responses during hypoxia in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 156: 202–212 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  173. Yang S, Murphy RL, Morishige DT, Klein PE, Rooney WL, Mullet JE (2014) Sorghum phytochrome B inhibits flowering in long days by activating expression of SbPRR37 and SbGHD7, repressors of SbEHD1, SbCN8 and SbCN12. PLoS One 9: e105352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  174. Yu Y, Hirsch JP (1995) An essential gene pair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae with a potential role in mating. DNA Cell Biol 14: 411–418 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  175. Yuan C, Xi L, Kou Y, Zhao Y, Zhao G (2015) Current perspectives on shoot branching regulation. Front Agr Sci Eng 2: 38–52 [Google Scholar]
  176. Zhang L, Li Z, Quan R, Li G, Wang R, Huang R (2011) An AP2 domain-containing gene, ESE1, targeted by the ethylene signaling component EIN3 is important for the salt response in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 157: 854–865 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  177. Zhu XG, Long SP, Ort DR (2010) Improving photosynthetic efficiency for greater yield. Annu Rev Plant Biol 61: 235–261 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Data

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES