Campylobacter jejuni is a leading cause of bacterial foodborne diarrhea worldwide.1 It is also associated with debilitating sequelae such as the Guillain-Barre and Miller Fisher Syndromes.2 C. jejuni is primarily contracted via the consumption of contaminated poultry products; however, this pathogen is prevalent in a variety of sources, including other food animals, the farm environment, and water.3 Given these diverse environments, C. jejuni must possess versatile mechanisms that allow it to survive and/or persist in a variety of niches. This environmental flexibility is notable, because C. jejuni has a relatively small genome, lacks many of the classical stress response factors associated with other enteric pathogens, and is generally considered fastidious under laboratory conditions. Consequently, analysis of potentially multipurpose mechanisms that can facilitate C. jejuni's adaptation to disparate environments will result in a better understanding of the pathogenesis and ecology of this pathogen.
Recently, we have demonstrated that the metabolism of inorganic polyphosphate (poly-P), a molecule associated with survival and virulence phenotypes in many bacterial pathogens, contributes to the pathobiology of C. jejuni.4-8 A key role for poly-P in a fastidious organism like C. jejuni is consistent with the ability of poly-P to efficiently store energy and phosphate,9-10 which can in turn fuel essential cellular functions.11 The poly-P metabolism in C. jejuni is mediated primarily by polyphosphate kinase 1 (PPK1) and polyphosphate kinase 2 (PPK2). Polyphosphate kinase 1 functions to mediate the synthesis of poly-P,11-13 while PPK2 preferentially facilitates the generation of GTP from poly-P.14-15 Both PPK1 and PPK2 (PPKs) contribute to survival, adaptation, and virulence in many bacterial pathogens.11 For example, we have shown that the impairment of the ppks (ppk1 and ppk2) can affect a wide range of phenotypes in C. jejuni,4-6 including biofilm formation, and the resistance to osmotic, nutrient, and antimicrobial stresses. In addition, mutants show decreased ability to colonize chickens and infect human intestine epithelial cells in vitro. Despite these phenotypic observations, the mechanism(s) by which the PPKs impact these phenotypes in C. jejuni remain largely uncharacterized.
Previous studies have revealed differential expression of genes involved in stress response and virulence in both ppk1 and ppk2 mutants of disparate bacterial pathogens.4,5,16-17 For example, 250 genes were up-regulated and more than 450 genes were down-regulated in a ppk1 mutant of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.11 Another study showed that 81 genes were differentially expressed in a poly-P-deficient mutant of Pseudomonas sp. B4.18 Additionally, poly-P was shown to bind to the principal sigma factor of RNA polymerase in Helicobacter pylori during starvation.19 Taken together, these observations suggest that poly-P and the PPKs might affect the expression of many genes and contribute to the regulation of various cellular mechanisms. If the PPKs impact gene expression and play similar role(s) in C. jejuni, this might allow us to associate genotype-phenotype relationships that underlie the pleiotropic effects associated with ppks impairment in C. jejuni. Here, we conducted RNA-Seq analysis on C. jejuni 81–176 (parental strain) and its ppk1 and ppk2 mutants.4-5 We found that both ppk1 and ppk2 affected the expression of multiple genes which can be linked to these pleiotropic phenotypes. Our results further highlight the importance of poly-P metabolism in the survival and adaptation of C. jejuni.
The wildtype C. jejuni 81–176 (WT) and the previously described Δppk1 and Δppk2 mutants were used in this study.4-5 The strains were grown in Mueller-Hinton broth (MH, Fisher Scientific, Pennsylvania, USA) under microaerobic conditions (85% N2, 10% CO2, 5% O2) at 42ºC with shaking (200 rpm) and harvested at both log (8 h) and stationary (18 h) phases of growth. RNA was isolated from both phases of growth for each strain as described previously.20 Briefly, the bacterial cells were treated with RNAProtect Bacteria Reagent as described in the manufacturer's instructions (Qiagen Inc.., California, USA). The cells were then lysed by the addition of Proteinase K (1 mg/ml; Epicenter) followed by incubation at room temperature for 10 min. The total RNA was isolated and purified using RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen), and the samples were treated to remove any residual DNA by using the RNase-free DNase Set (Qiagen). Total RNA was then eluted in RNase-free water and an aliquot was subjected to an additional step of DNase treatment using TURBO DNA-free™ (Ambion, Life Technologies, New York, USA). The absence of DNA was confirmed by PCR amplification using Campylobacter-specific 16S rRNA primers,21 and the quantity and purity of the RNA was determined by using the NanoDrop® ND-1000 spectrophotometer (ThermoFisher Scientific, New York, USA). Total RNA samples (~5 µg) were subjected to depletion of rRNA using Ribo-Zero™ rRNA removal kit for Gram-negative bacteria (Epicentre, Wisconsin, USA) and assessed using denaturing formaldehyde gel electrophoresis. The concentration and purity of enriched mRNA was determined by using the NanoDrop® ND-1000 spectrophotometer and the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, California, USA).
RNA-Seq libraries were prepared from the enriched mRNA using the mRNA-Seq Sample Preparation Kit (Illumina, Wisconsin, USA) as described by the manufacturer. Briefly, the mRNA-Seq library construction consisted of the following steps, i) fragmentation, ii) first strand cDNA synthesis, iii) second strand cDNA synthesis, iv) end repair, v) A-tailing, vi) adapter ligation, vii) size selection of cDNA fragments in the 200 bp range and, viii) PCR enrichment. Libraries were generated for 6 bacterial samples [3 bacterial strains (WT, ∆ppk1 and ∆ppk2) × 2 growth conditions (log phase + stationary phase)], which was biologically replicated in a separate experiment. Barcoded RNA-Seq libraries were analyzed on the Agilent Technologies 2100 Bioanalyzer to assess size, purity and concentration. The RNA-Seq libraries were sequenced on the Illumina Genome Analyzer IIX using Multiplexing Sequencing Primers, PhiX Control v3 and standard sequencing reagents as described by the manufacturer (Illumina). Reads were then aligned to the reference genome of C. jejuni and RNA-Seq analysis was carried out using the Partek Genomics Suite (Partek Inc.., Missouri, USA). Transcripts with a log2 fold change >1.5 or <1.5 and a p value ≤0.05 were considered to be significantly differentially expressed. To confirm the sequencing results, qRT- PCR was performed on a subset of genes (Table S1). For this purpose, RNA was re-isolated from the strains at log and stationary phases as described above and cDNA was synthesized with the SuperScript III First-Strand Synthesis System (Life Technologies). The SYBR® Green RT-PCR kit (Invitrogen, New York, USA) was used to perform the qRT-PCR analysis. Samples were tested in triplicates and the analysis was replicated at least 3 times. Relative gene expression was determined by the 2(-ΔΔC(T)) method.22
The RNA-Seq analysis during the exponential growth phase revealed 15 differentially expressed (3 upregulated and 12 downregulated) genes in the Δppk1 (Table 1). It should be noted that to focus the study, the genes that encoded hypothetical proteins were reported in Table S2. The downregulation of genes encoding heat shock proteins, such as clpB, grpE and dnaK, was prominently observed in the Δppk1 (Table 1). This is important, because of the well-characterized roles of heat shock proteins in mediating the general stress response and for their role as chaperones in binding/refolding and degrading misfolded and aggregated proteins.23-25 Despite the absence of heat stress in this study, both heat shock proteins and chaperones (DnaK and ClpB) are known to be important for protein homeostasis in this bacterium under non-stress conditions.26 Furthermore, downregulation of these genes is consistent with the increased sensitivity observed for the Δppk1 to a variety of stresses and with a previous study in Mycobacterium spp showing that PPK1 was associated with general stress tolerance and the response to heat stress.4,27 Therefore, the differential expression of the heat shock proteins and chaperones was not surprising.
Table 1.
Δppk1 DEG (Log phase) | Log2 fold | Proposed Function (Abbreviation) |
---|---|---|
CJJ81176_RS06440 | −2.58223 | Flagellin A (FlaA) |
CJJ81176_RS02475 | −2.21966 | Molecular chaperone (ClpB) |
CJJ81176_RS05980 | −2.06765 | Cobalamin ABC transporter permease |
CJJ81176_RS03630 | −2.03358 | Molecular chaperone (DnaK) |
CJJ81176_RS02650 | −1.89773 | Flagellar protein (FlaG) |
CJJ81176_RS02655 | −1.71348 | Flagellar cap protein (FliD) |
CJJ81176_RS05935 | −1.62294 | Molecular chaperone (GroEL) |
CJJ81176_RS03625 | −1.52779 | Co-chaperone protein (GrpE) |
CJJ81176_RS05905 | −4.55049 | Membrane protein |
CJJ81176_RS05480 | −2.839 | Glucosyltransferase (PglI) |
CJJ81176_RS06615 | −3.62449 | Toluene tolerance protein |
CJJ81176_RS05825 | −2.58223 | 2-oxobutyrate oxidase |
CJJ81176_RS00540 | 1.526291 | Chromosome partitioning protein (ParB) |
CJJ81176_RS03800 | 1.718938 | 2-oxoglutarate:acceptor oxidoreductase |
CJJ81176_RS05940 | 3.909622 | Sensor histidine kinase |
DEG (Stationary phase) | ||
CJJ81176_RS02690 | −2.89733 | C4-dicarboxylate ABC transporter |
CJJ81176_RS03575 | −2.35115 | Adhesin |
CJJ81176_RS03825 | −2.13977 | Signal transduction histidine kinase |
CJJ81176_RS04095 | −2.02534 | Membrane protein |
CJJ81176_RS03320 | −1.9993 | Flagellar L-ring protein (FlgH) |
CJJ81176_RS03620 | −1.95134 | HrcA family transcriptional regulator |
CJJ81176_RS03800 | −1.85067 | 2-oxoglutarate:acceptor oxidoreductase |
CJJ81176_RS04090 | −1.8288 | Major Facilitator Superfamily (MFS) transporter |
CJJ81176_RS04235 | −1.82852 | Flagellar hook-associated protein (FlgL) |
CJJ81176_RS03370 | −1.77805 | Flagellar basal body rod protein (FlgG) |
CJJ81176_RS01310 | −1.74863 | Tautomerase |
CJJ81176_RS06535 | −1.69151 | Membrane protein |
CJJ81176_RS03375 | −1.69103 | Flagellar basal body rod protein (FlgG) |
CJJ81176_RS06110 | −1.67824 | Isomerase |
CJJ81176_RS08145 | −1.64488 | 50S ribosomal protein L18 (RplR) |
CJJ81176_RS06410 | −1.62838 | Flagellin modification protein (PseA) |
CJJ81176_RS07355 | −1.59133 | ABC transporter permease |
CJJ81176_RS08350 | −1.56166 | Flagellar hook protein (FlgE) |
CJJ81176_RS04755 | −1.55111 | Major Facilitator Superfamily (MFS) transporter major |
CJJ81176_RS03630 | −1.5464 | Molecular chaperone (DnaK) |
CJJ81176_RS04260 | −1.52623 | Chemotaxis protein (CheY) |
CJJ81176_RS03290 | −1.51055 | ABC transporter |
CJJ81176_RS06305 | −1.50693 | UDP-N-acetylglucosamine 4,6-dehydratase |
CJJ81176_RS01785 | −4.68234 | Colicin |
CJJ81176_RS03100 | 1.573296 | peptide methionine sulfoxide reductase (MsrA) |
CJJ81176_RS05130 | 1.577051 | Carbon-nitrogenhydrolase |
CJJ81176_RS04670 | 1.632199 | Membrane protein insertion efficiency factor |
CJJ81176_RS06600 | 1.636997 | Guanine permease |
CJJ81176_RS05135 | 1.658186 | Exodeoxyribonuclease VII, small subunit |
CJJ81176_RS01830 | 1.70258 | Sulfoxide reductase catalytic subunit (YedY) |
CJJ81176_RS08155 | 1.795694 | 30S ribosomal protein S8 |
CJJ81176_RS08295 | 1.866083 | 3-isopropylmalate dehydratase small subunit (LeuD) |
CJJ81176_RS01905 | 1.911169 | Tram-like protein |
CJJ81176_RS02320 | 2.158265 | Preprotein translocase subunit (SecE) |
CJJ81176_RS02990 | 2.66359 | Phosphate ABC transporter substrate-binding protein (PstS) |
CJJ81176_RS07070 | 3.117623 | Transformation system protein |
Flagella-associated genes (CJJ81176_RS06440, CJJ81176_RS02650 and CJJ81176_RS02655) and flagella glycosylation-associated gene (pglI; CJJ81176_RS05480) were downregulated in the Δppk1 in log phase (Table 1). A proteome analysis of a poly-P deficient P. aeruginosa revealed that genes encoding flagellar proteins were underrepresented, which supports our findings.28 The Δppk1 did not display significant motility defects,4 which might indicate that the degree of downregulation of the flagella genes might not have been enough to impair motility. This observation can also be reconciled with previous studies that showed that flagellar glycosylation mutants were still motile but defective in autoagglutination.29 Furthermore, a previous study reported the isolation of 4 mutants (Cj1318, Cj1333, Cj1340c, and Cj1062) that expressed wild-type levels of FlaA and were deficient in autoagglutination.30 This is important, because impairment of autoagglutination and flagella can impede intestinal epithelial cells invasion and chicken colonization, respectively, which might partially explain the reduced ability of the Δppk1 to colonize the chicken host.4,30-31 However, it should be noted that autoagglutination phenotype of the Δppk1 mutant of C. jejuni has not been characterized yet. Although further investigation is required to discern the importance of the downregulation of these genes, our results clearly highlight the contributions of ppk1 to various phenotypes in C. jejuni.
We previously reported an upregulation of genes involved in phosphate uptake (pstC, pstS, phosR) and the stringent response (spoT) in the Δppk1.4 However, this was not observed in the RNA-Seq analysis of the Δppk1 during the log phase. It should be noted that in the former study, we were attempting to test gene expression under acid stress and only incubated the acid-treated and control cultures for 30 min before RNA isolation and subsequent qRT-PCR analysis.4 Therefore, it is possible that upregulation of the genes involved in phosphate uptake and the stringent response might not have been detected in the curret study, because the bacterial cultures were incubated for a longer time to achieve log phase growth before the RNA-Seq analysis.
In stationary phase, 40 genes were downregulated and 13 were upregulated in the Δppk1 (Table 1, Table S2). Similar to above, many of the downregulated genes were associated with the flagella, including genes encoding the flagellar hook protein (flgE), the flagellar L-ring protein (flgH), the flagellar hook-associated protein (flgL), the flagellar basal body rod protein (flgG), and flagellin modification protein (pseA). Other genes with decreased expression included the gene encoding the HrcA family transcriptional regulator (Table 1). The downregulation of hrcA is accompanied by upregulation of the stress response genes groEL/S.32 However, the upregulation of these stress response genes (groEL/S) in the stationary phase were not detected in the Δppk1 strain. Regardless, the differential expression of the genes encoding the HrcA family transcriptional regulator and the DnaK chaperone suggest that the ppk1 might contribute to the thermotolerant properties of C. jejuni.
Among the 13 upregulated genes in the Δppk1 in the stationary phase were genes that encode a phosphate ABC transporter substrate-binding protein (CJJ81176_RS02990), a preprotein translocase subunit (secE; CJJ81176_RS02320), a permease (CJJ81176_RS06600) and a carbon-nitrogen hydrolase (CJJ81176_RS05130) (Table 1).
In this study, 14 (9 downregulated and 5 upregulated) genes were differentially regulated in the Δppk2 during the log phase (Table 2). The gene encoding catalase (CJJ81176_RS06675) and CJJ81176_RS01080 which encodes a serine protease were among those downregulated in the Δppk2 strain in the log phase. Serine proteases are known to have significant roles in prokaryotes, contributing to diverse functions such as metabolism, cell signaling, adaptation to the extracellular environment, cellular defenses, host invasion, and virulence.33
Table 2.
Δppk2 DEG (Log phase) | Log2 fold | Proposed Function (Abbreviation) |
---|---|---|
CJJ81176_RS02990 | −1.73 | Phosphate ABC transporter substrate-binding protein |
CJJ81176_RS06675 | −1.72 | Catalase (KatA) |
CJJ81176_RS03985 | −1.70 | CoA-binding protein |
CJJ81176_RS00395 | −4.18 | Cation-binding protein |
CJJ81176_RS01080 | −2.42 | Serine protease |
CJJ81176_RS02935 | 1.53 | Sulfurase |
CJJ81176_RS03255 | 1.60 | C4-dicarboxylate ABC transporter (DcuB) |
CJJ81176_RS04170 | 1.70 | Arylsulfate sulfotransferase |
CJJ81176_RS03005 | 1.96 | Phosphate import ATP-binding protein (PstB) |
DEG (Stationary phase) | ||
CJJ81176_RS04335 | -1.56444 | Alanine racemase |
CJJ81176_RS04100 | 1.528314 | Membrane protein |
CJJ81176_RS02320 | 1.575105 | Preprotein translocase subunit (SecE) |
CJJ81176_RS08175 | 1.593406 | 50S ribosomal protein L14 (RplN) |
CJJ81176_RS05955 | 1.867396 | CopG family transcriptional regulator |
CJJ81176_RS07160 | 1.886767 | Membrane protein |
CJJ81176_RS05845 | 1.997799 | Membrane protein |
CJJ81176_RS03005 | 2.149801 | Phosphate import ATP-binding protein (PstB) |
Interestingly, the survival of the Δppk2 and the WT after exposure to hydrogen peroxide and paraquat (oxidative stress) was similar. However, the Δppk2 showed decreased survival under aerobic stress, and the KatA has been shown to contribute to survival under aerobic stress.5,34 Furthermore, the expression of the gene encoding DcuB (CJJ81176_RS03255), a protein that mediates aspartate transport under oxygen limitation and fumarate:succinate exchange during fumarate respiration,35 was upregulated in the Δppk2 during log phase (Table 2). It has been previously observed that dcuB was upregulated under acid shock conditions, and the authors speculated that dcuB might contribute to resisting cytoplasm acidification in C. jejuni.36
In the stationary phase, it was interesting to observe that the gene that encode alanine racemase, an enzyme involved in peptidoglycan biosynthesis, and secE which contributes to protein export were differentially expressed in the Δppk2. Similar to ppk1, these observations confirm that ppk2 is an important contributor to the pathobiology of C. jejuni. However, unlike ppk1, the effect of ppk2 is less pronounced in terms of the number of affected genes in the stationary phase.
To validate the RNA-Seq data, we performed qRT-PCR analysis on a subset of the differentially expressed genes in the ppk mutants (Table S1). Our results showed a high correlation between qRT-PCR and the RNA-Seq analysis of the gene expression in the Δppk1 (r = 0.8) and the Δppk2 (r = 0.9), respectively. In conclusion, this study showed that deletion of ppk1 and ppk2 impact the expression of many genes that are involved in important functions in C. jejuni, corroborating the pleiotropic effects associated with the ppk1 and ppk2 deletion mutants. Collectively, we also propose that the polyphosphate kinases play an important regulatory role in C. jejuni.
Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.
Acknowledgments
We thank the Molecular and Cellular Imaging Center (MCIC, OARDC) for technical assistance.
Funding
Dr. Rajashekara's laboratory is supported by the funds from Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center (OARDC), The Ohio State University, and the Agriculture and Food Research Initiative (AFRI) grant # 2012–68003–19679, U. S. Department of Agriculture.
Supplemental Material
Supplemental data for this article can be accessed on the publisher's website.
References
- 1.Epps SV, Harvey RB, Hume ME, Phillips TD, Anderson RC, Nisbet DJ. Foodborne Campylobacter: infections, metabolism, pathogenesis and reservoirs. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2013; 10:6292-304; PMID:24287853; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.3390/ijerph10126292 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Altekruse SF, Stern NJ, Fields PI, Swerdlow DL. Campylobacter jejuni–an emerging foodborne pathogen. Emerg Infect Dis 1999; 5:28-35; PMID:10081669; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.3201/eid0501.990104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Sahin O, Kassem II, Shen Z, Lin J, Rajashekara G, Zhang Q. Campylobacter in Poultry: Ecology and Potential Interventions. Avian Dis 2015; 59: 185-200; PMID:26473668; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1637/11072-032315-Review [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Gangaiah D, Kassem II, Liu Z, Rajashekara G. Importance of polyphosphate kinase 1 for Campylobacter jejuni viable-but-nonculturable cell formation, natural transformation, and antimicrobial resistance. Appl Environ Microbiol 2009; 75:7838-49; PMID:19837830; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1128/AEM.01603-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Gangaiah D, Liu Z, Arcos J, Kassem II, Sanad Y, Torrelles JB, Rajashekara G. Polyphosphate kinase 2: a novel determinant of stress responses and pathogenesis in Campylobacter jejuni. PLoS One 2010; 5:e12142; PMID:20808906; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1371/journal.pone.0012142 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kassem II, Rajashekara G. An ancient molecule in a recalcitrant pathogen: the contributions of poly-P to the pathogenesis and stress responses of Campylobacter jejuni. Future Microbiol 2011; 6:1117-20; PMID:22004028; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.2217/fmb.11.94 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kassem II, Chandrashekhar K, Rajashekara G. Of energy and survival incognito: a relationship between viable but non-culturable cells formation and inorganic polyphosphate and formate metabolism in Campylobacter jejuni. Front Microbiol 2013; 4:183; PMID:23847606 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Malde A, Gangaiah D, Chandrashekhar K, Pina-Mimbela R, Torrelles JB, Rajashekara G. Functional characterization of exopolyphosphatase/guanosine pentaphosphate phosphohydrolase (PPX/GPPA) of Campylobacter jejuni. Virulence 2014; 5: 521-33; PMID:24569519; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.4161/viru.28311 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kornberg A. Inorganic polyphosphate: toward making a forgotten polymer unforgettable. J Bacteriol 1995; 177: 491-6; PMID:7836277 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Achbergerová L, Nahálka J. Polyphosphate-an ancient energy source and active metabolic regulator. Microb Cell Fact 2011; 10:63; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1186/1475-2859-10-63 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Rao NN, Gómez-García MR, Kornberg A. Inorganic polyphosphate: essential for growth and survival. Annu Rev Biochem 2009; 78: 605-47; PMID:19344251; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1146/annurev.biochem.77.083007.093039 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Zhang H, Gómez-García MR, Shi X, Rao NN, Kornberg A. Polyphosphate kinase 1, a conserved bacterial enzyme, in a eukaryote, Dictyostelium discoideum, with a role in cytokinesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007; 104: 16486-91; PMID:17940044; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1073/pnas.0706847104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Akiyama M, Crooke E, Kornberg A. The polyphosphate kinase gene of Escherichia coli. Isolation and sequence of the ppk gene and membrane location of the protein. J Biol Chem 1992; 267:22556-61; PMID:1331061 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kuroda A, Kornberg A. Polyphosphate kinase as a nucleoside diphosphate kinase in Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997; 94:439-42; PMID:9012801; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1073/pnas.94.2.439 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ishige K, Zhang H, Kornberg A. Polyphosphate kinase (PPK2), a potent, polyphosphate-driven generator of GTP. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002; 99:16684-8; PMID:12482933; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1073/pnas.262655299 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Brown MR, Kornberg A. The long and short of it - polyphosphate, PPK and bacterial survival. Trends Biochem Sci 2008; 33:284-90; PMID:18487048; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.tibs.2008.04.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Manganelli R. Polyphosphate and stress response in mycobacteria. Mol Microbiol 2007; 65: 258-60; PMID:17590232; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.05819.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Varela C, Mauriaca C, Paradela A, Albar JP, Jerez CA, Chávez FP. New structural and functional defects in polyphosphate deficient bacteria: a cellularand proteomic study. BMC Microbiol. 2010; 10:7; PMID:20067623; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1186/1471-2180-10-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Yang ZX, Zhou YN, Yang Y, Jin DJ. Polyphosphate binds to the principal sigma factor of RNA polymerase during starvation response in Helicobacter pylori. Mol Microbiol 2010; 77: 618-27; PMID:20553390; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07233.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Guo B, Wang Y, Shi F, Barton YW, Plummer P, Reynolds DL, Nettleton D, Grinnage-Pulley T, Lin J, Zhang Q. CmeR functions as a pleiotropic regulator and is required for optimal colonization of Campylobacter jejuni in vivo. J Bacteriol 2008; 190:1879-90; PMID:18178742; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1128/JB.01796-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Denis M, Refrégier-Petton J, Laisney MJ, Ermel G, Salvat G. Campylobacter contamination in French chicken production from farm to consumers. Use of a PCR assay for detection and identification of Campylobacter jejuni and Camp coli. J Appl Microbiol 2001; 91:255-67; PMID:11473590; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2001.01380.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods 2001; 25:402-08; PMID:11846609; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1006/meth.2001.1262 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Brehmer D, Gassler C, Rist W, Mayer MP, Bukau B. Influence of GrpE on DnaK-substrate interactions. J Biol Chem 2004; 279:27957-64; PMID:15102842; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1074/jbc.M403558200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Gaynor EC, Wells DH, MacKichan JK, Falkow S. The Campylobacter jejuni stringent response controls specific stress survival and virulence-associated phenotypes. Mol Microbiol 2005; 56:8-27; PMID:15773975; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04525.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Konkel ME, Kim BJ, Klena JD, Young CR, Ziprin R. Characterization of the thermal stress response of Campylobacter jejuni. Infect Immun 1998; 66:3666-72; PMID:9673247 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Baek KT, Vegge CS, Skorko-Glonek J, Brondsted L. Different contributions of HtrA protease and chaperone activities to Campylobacter jejuni stress tolerance and physiology. Appl Environ Microbiol 2011; 77:57-66; PMID:21075890; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1128/AEM.01603-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Sureka K, Dey S, Datta P, Singh AK, Dasgupta A, Rodrigue S, Basu J, Kundu M. Polyphosphate kinase is involved in stress-induced mprAB-sigE-rel signalling in mycobacteria. Mol Microbiol 2007; 65: 261-76; PMID:17630969; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.05814.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Fraley CD, Rashid MH, Lee SS, Gottschalk R, Harrison J, Wood PJ, Brown MR, Kornberg A. A polyphosphate kinase 1 (ppk1) mutant of Pseudomonas aeruginosa exhibits multiple ultrastructural and functional defects. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007; 104:3526-31; PMID:17360677; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1073/pnas.0609733104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ewing CP, Andreishcheva E, Guerry P. Functional characterization of flagellin glycosylation in Campylobacter jejuni 81-176. J Bacteriol 2009; 191:7086-93; PMID:19749047; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1128/JB.00378-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Golden NJ, Acheson DW. Identification of motility and autoagglutination Campylobacter jejuni mutants by random transposon mutagenesis. Infect Immun 2002; 70:1761-71; PMID:11895937; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1128/IAI.70.4.1761-1771.2002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Nachamkin I, Yang XH, Stern NJ. Role of Campylobacter jejuni flagella as colonization factors for three-day-old chicks: analysis with flagellar mutants. Appl Environ Microbiol 1993; 59: 1269-73; PMID:8517729 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Holmes CW, Penn CW, Lund PA. The hrcA and hspR regulons of Campylobacter jejuni. Microbiology 2010; 156:158-66; PMID:19850618; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1099/mic.0.031708-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Tripathi LP, Sowdhamini R. Genome-wide survey of prokaryotic serine proteases: analysis of distribution and domain architectures of five serine protease families in prokaryotes. BMC Genomics 2008; 9:549; PMID:19019219; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1186/1471-2164-9-549 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Stead D, Park SF. Roles of Fe superoxide dismutase and catalase in resistance of Campylobacter coli to freeze-thaw stress. Appl Environ Microbiol 2000; 66: 3110-12; PMID:10877815; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1128/AEM.66.7.3110-3112.2000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Guccione E, Leon-Kempis Mdel R, Pearson BM, Hitchin E, Mulholland F, van Diemen PM, Stevens MP, Kelly DJ. Amino acid-dependent growth of Campylobacter jejuni: key roles for aspartase (AspA) under microaerobic and oxygen-limited conditions and identification of AspB (Cj0762), essential for growth on glutamate. Mol Microbiol 2008; 69:77-93; PMID:18433445; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06263.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Reid AN, Pandey R, Palyada K, Naikare H, Stintzi A. Identification of Campylobacter jejuni genes involved in the response to acidic pH and stomach transit. Appl Environ Microbiol 2008; 74:1583-97; PMID:18192414; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1128/AEM.01507-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.