Abstract
Skeletal muscle-specific stem cells are pivotal for tissue development and regeneration. Muscle plasticity, inherent in these processes, is also essential for daily life activities. Great advances and efforts have been made in understanding the function of the skeletal muscle-dedicated stem cells, called muscle satellite cells, and the specific signaling mechanisms that activate them for recruitment in the repair of the injured muscle. Elucidating these signaling mechanisms may contribute to devising therapies for muscular injury or disease. Here we review the studies that have contributed to our understanding of how calcium signaling regulates skeletal muscle development, homeostasis and regeneration, with a focus on the calcium dynamics and calcium-dependent effectors that participate in these processes.
Keywords: skeletal muscle, muscle satellite cells, muscle regeneration, muscle hypertrophy, calcium signaling, calcineurin, ryanodine receptors, muscle wasting
Graphical Abstract
1. Introduction
Throughout tissue morphogenesis and homeostasis, stem cells are recruited to generate the necessary tissue mass, to enable plastic changes in tissue size when challenged by changing stimuli, and to replenish damaged or degenerated tissue. Ca2+ is a ubiquitous intracellular signal that regulates a myriad of cellular processes. Skeletal muscle formation and plasticity presents an excellent model system for the study of the role of Ca2+ signaling due to the fact that Ca2+ dynamics are essential for muscle function. While the tight coupling of muscle excitation and contraction by Ca2+ dynamics has been well established, comparatively little is known about the role of Ca2+ dynamics in muscle formation, growth and regeneration. Because all these physiological contexts recruit stem cells, the investigation of muscle stem cell Ca2+ physiology becomes crucial for the elucidation of Ca2+ signaling-dependent regulation of skeletal muscle dynamics.
Myogenesis occurs during embryonic development through the proliferation and differentiation of dedicated progenitors in the somites. These cells initially express the transcription factors Pax3 and Pax7, but lose this expression during progressive specialization through the expression of a family of myogenic regulatory factors (MRFs), which include Myf5, MyoD, myogenin and MRF4 [1, 2]. Skeletal muscle formation continues with the differentiation of these specialized progenitors to form muscle fibers. A subset of the myogenic progenitors does not proceed through this specialization, retains Pax3/Pax7 expression and remains quiescent in the maturing and adult skeletal muscle. These muscle-specific stem cells are called muscle satellite cells [2, 3].
The participation of muscle satellite cells in skeletal muscle homeostasis has been a matter of debate, although robust evidence supports the role of satellite cells in muscle regeneration [4]. Inhibition of the muscle growth inhibitors myostatin and activin A by knocking out their receptor Acvr2 from myofibers in mice deficient in muscle satellite cells induces muscle hypertrophy, without satellite cell proliferation or an increase in nuclei number in myofibers [5]. This suggests that satellite cells may not play an essential role in muscle hypertrophy. In contrast, depletion of Pax7-expressing cells from the adult injured muscle blocks muscle regeneration [6–9], indicating the indispensable function of muscle satellite cells for muscle regeneration. The different roles of skeletal muscle stem cells in muscle development, growth and regeneration may originate from distinct physiological profiles of muscle stem cells in the different contexts. Identifying conserved and distinct mechanisms among myogenesis, muscle homeostasis and regeneration may be relevant to devising effective therapies for the injured and dystrophic skeletal muscle.
Here we review the role of Ca2+-mediated activity in myogenesis, skeletal muscle plasticity and regeneration.
2. Calcium signaling in skeletal muscle development
Skeletal muscle development progresses through several stages by which muscle progenitor cells become mature muscle fibers. Although different species proceed through distinct cellular events, they all share a common program consisting of the proliferation of mesodermal stem cells, then the progressive specialization into skeletal muscle progenitors, followed by the differentiation of muscle cells and further specification into different muscle cell types (Figure 1). This sequence of events finishes with the spatial arrangement of cells to form the functional musculature [2, 10–12]. Finally muscle cells undergo two rounds of fusion, first into multinucleated nascent myotubes and second into myofibers [13–16].
Figure 1.
Cellular mechanisms of skeletal muscle development, homeostasis and regeneration. During embryonic development mesodermal muscle stem cells expressing Pax3/Pax7 transcription factors proliferate and specialize into myogenic progenitors through the expression of the myogenic regulatory factors including Myf5, MyoD and myogenin. Progressive differentiation is followed by sarcomere assembly, spatial arrangement of muscle cells, and their fusion into multinucleated muscle fibers. Muscle growth requires protein synthesis and enlargement of individual fibers, and is triggered during postnatal development and upon exercise or muscle overload. Trophic stimuli can also elicit a switch in muscle fiber type. In contrast, muscle wasting is characteristic of muscle dystrophy and aging. Skeletal muscle regeneration requires activation of muscle satellite cells that recapitulate the myogenic program, repairing and replenishing the injured tissue.
The role of Ca2+ signaling has been considered in each of these developmental steps and clear evidence of the necessity for different aspects of Ca2+ signaling has emerged in a broad spectrum of species, including the invertebrates Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila melanogaster, the lower vertebrates Xenopus laevis and zebrafish and in mammals such as mice and humans. The identified molecular mechanisms underlying Ca2+ participation in muscle development are responsible for either shaping Ca2+ dynamics or for transducing Ca2+ signals into a cellular response. Ca2+ stores are pivotal for eliciting a precise spatiotemporal pattern of Ca2+ signal in developing muscle cells. Expression of inositol-triphosphate receptors (IP3R) and ryanodine receptors (RyR) is developmentally regulated in mouse [17] and frog embryos [18], suggesting critical roles at different stages of muscle morphogenesis. Indeed, inhibiting Ca2+ transients in Xenopus laevis embryos disrupts skeletal muscle development by interfering with myofibril organization and sarcomere assembly [19]. In addition, inhibiting the Ca2+/Calmodulin (CaM)-dependent myosin light chain kinase by interfering pharmacologically with its kinase activity or by incubating with a peptide pseudosubstrate impairs myosin thick filament assembly [20], implying a potential mechanism for RyR-Ca2+-driven muscle development. RyR1 homozygous mutant mice in which RyR-mediated Ca2+ release is abolished die perinatally and also exhibit a severely disrupted musculature with small myotubes and disarranged myofibrils [21]. Altogether, these findings demonstrate a universal requirement for RyR-mediated Ca2+ dynamics in skeletal myogenesis. In addition, human myoblast differentiation in vitro is regulated by intracellular Ca2+ increases induced by changes in membrane potential [22–24]. Xenopus embryonic myocytes exhibit two types of Ca2+ transients, both RyRdependent, but of different durations [25]. The long-duration transients that last on average 80 seconds are present during a restricted developmental window prior to formation of myofibrils, while short 2-second-long transients persist during sarcomere assembly. Interestingly, artificial extension of long transient production inhibits sarcomere assembly [25], suggesting that the spatiotemporal code contained in the Ca2+ dynamics of differentiating muscle cells is critical for muscle development.
Directly linked to the pattern of Ca2+ dynamics in developing muscle cells is the store-operated calcium entry (SOCE) orchestrated by the sensor of internal Ca2+ stores, stromal interaction molecule 1 (STIM1), and the SOCE channels Orai1 and Transient Receptor Potential Canonical (TRPC) channels. STIM1 expression is developmentally regulated, peaking postnatally in the developing muscle in mice [26]. Mice lacking functional STIM1 die perinatally from a skeletal myopathy [27], indicating that STIM1-dependent Ca2+ signaling is necessary for myogenesis. Moreover, sarcolipin, an inhibitor of the sarcomere reticulum Ca2+ pump that opposes STIM1 action, is highly expressed in the embryonic muscle and is markedly increased in the muscle of loss-of-function mutant STIM1 mice suggesting that sarcolipin and STIM1 govern SOCE during myogenesis [26]. Expression of TRPC1 is also developmentally regulated increasing at the beginning of differentiation, and is necessary for myoblast migration and fusion into myotubes [28]. Moreover, in myoblasts TRPC1 constitutes an essential stretch-activated channel modulated by sphingosine 1-phosphate, a bioactive lipid involved in satellite cell biology and myogenesis [29]. These studies serve to highlight the importance of controlling Ca2+ dynamics to proper muscle development.
A number of signaling elements immediately downstream of Ca2+ signal are demonstrably vital to normal muscle development. The candidate effectors that account for the importance of Ca2+ signaling in myogenesis comprise the CaM-dependent kinases and phosphatases, mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) and Ca2+-sensitive transcription factors including the nuclear factor of activated T cells (NFATc). Ca2+- calmodulin-dependent protein kinase (CaMK) signaling prevents formation of histone deacetylase-myocyte enhancer factor 2 (HDAC-MEF2) complexes [30, 31], thereby releasing MEF2 myogenic transcriptional activity [30, 32, 33], which otherwise is repressed by HDAC4 and 5 nuclear export [34].
The role of the CaM-dependent phosphatase, calcineurin, in mouse myogenesis starts with its function in early skeletal muscle cell differentiation [35, 36] by regulating expression of transcription factors MEF2, MyoD and myogenin [35–37]. In Drosophila, the role of calcineurin in muscle development is also apparent; mutants for the regulatory subunit of calcineurin exhibit severe defects in flight muscle organization [38]. Additionally, calcineurin is involved in further muscle cell specialization, promoting differentiation of slow fibers in vitro and in vivo by recruiting the transcription factor NFATc [39–43]. Calcineurin dephosphorylates NFATc, promoting its translocation to the nucleus for the upregulation of target genes [37, 44, 45]. Knockout mice for different NFATc isoforms revealed that these variants contribute to distinct aspects of muscle development and function. NFATc3 knockout mice present with reduced muscle mass and number of fibers but appropriate organization of the existing fibers, demonstrating a role for NFATc3 in early stages of primary myogenesis [46]. In contrast, mice lacking NFATc2 present a normal number of formed fibers but are deficient in myoblast fusion resulting in significantly fewer nuclei per fiber [47, 48], demonstrating a dual role for NFATc in both formation and organization of musculature.
In addition to the classic CaM-dependent pathways, other signaling cascades may contribute to the transduction of Ca2+ dynamics-driven skeletal muscle development. Signaling through several elements of the MAPK pathway regulates different steps of myogenesis [49–51]. Erk2 promotes muscle progenitor proliferation by upregulating cyclin D1 expression [49]. Subsequently, MAPK p38 activity is induced during differentiation of L8 myoblasts. Inhibiting p38 impairs myogenesis shown by reduced expression of MyoD in Xenopus embryos and of MEF2 factors in L8 cells [50, 51]. Because MAPKs interact with Ca2+ signaling [52] in the developing spinal cord [53] and, importantly, in the skeletal muscle [54], they may jointly coordinate regulation of skeletal muscle development (Figure 2).
Figure 2.
Ca2+ signaling in skeletal muscle plasticity. Ca2+ activity in muscle cells at different maturational states leads to recruitment of Ca2+-dependent kinases and phosphatases triggering diverse cellular responses required for myogenesis, muscle homeostasis and regeneration.
3. Calcium signaling in skeletal muscle growth and maintenance
Once the skeletal muscle is formed during development, its size, performance and overall physiology remain plastic and the tissue responds to the changing surroundings (Figure 1). Skeletal muscle growth is based on further formation of large multinucleated muscle cells. After birth the tissue is subjected to an intense period of growth and differentiation coordinated by multiple signaling pathways. Some aspects of the cellular and molecular mechanisms responsible for the regulation of skeletal muscle growth are known and widely accepted but others remain unknown or controversial. Many of the myogenic factors that operate during embryonic development are also recruited for the growth of mature or maturing skeletal muscle, but myogenesis and plasticity are distinguished by different intrinsic and extrinsic environments and distinct competencies of cells. Here we will discuss signaling factors that are important in skeletal muscle growth and maintenance and the role of Ca2+ in their regulation.
The Insulin-like Growth Factor 1 (IGF-1) recruits the phosphoinositide 3-kinase-mammalian target of rapamycin (PI3-K/Akt/mTOR) signaling axis to implement muscle hypertrophy [55–57]. Whether the IGF-1-triggered pathway also recruits Ca2+ signaling to promote skeletal muscle growth, and in particular the calcineurin/NFAT signaling axis, has been a matter of debate. Some studies show that overexpressing calcineurin is sufficient to induce hypertrophy of soleus muscle fibers [58] and transgenic mice expressing either a null mutation for calcineurinAβ or muscle-specific overexpression of the calcineurin inhibitor MCIP1 exhibit reduced fiber size [59, 60], demonstrating a role for calcineurin in hypertrophy. In contrast, mice with either global or muscle-specific calcineurin depletion subjected to muscle hypertrophic growth by mechanical overload or IGF-1 stimulation do not show defects in muscle growth [61]. Nevertheless, these mice did show impairment in overload-mediated fiber-type switching [61]. These studies suggest that calcineurin is important for muscle growth and remodeling, however different animal models may lead to different levels of perturbation of calcineurin action and diverse compensatory mechanisms associated with the experimental approach. Importantly, insulin and IGF-1 induce Ca2+ dynamics through both Ca2+ influx and release from IP3R and RyR-operated stores [62–64]. Moreover, another hormone-like signaling molecule, prostaglandin F2α, increases intracellular Ca2+ concentration, activating NFATc2 and inducing muscle cell growth and nuclear accretion [65]. These studies suggest that molecularly diverse stimuli may converge at recruiting Ca2+ signaling to implement muscle growth (Figure 2).
Another experimental paradigm for studying muscle plasticity is the imposition of cyclic stretch in cultured muscle satellite cells. This activates Ca2+ influx through the mechanosensitive cation channel and the long-lasting-type voltage-gated Ca2+ channel [29, 66, 67]. Inhibiting these channels prevents muscle satellite cell activation and proliferation triggered by the mechanical stimulus [67], suggesting that Ca2+ dynamics are necessary for the mechanosensing response of muscle satellite cells. Stretch also activates the ras-MEK-extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) signaling pathway through the recruitment of phospholipase A2, which may interact with the stretch mechanoreceptors [68]. The integration of signaling pathways is given by the stimulus-driven, Ca2+-dependent phosphorylation of ERK and CREB, which results in the upregulation of early genes c-fos, c-jun, and egr-1 [69]. In turn, a timely targeted gene expression is required for long-term changes in muscle strength during physical training. Exercise also induces switching from fast-twitch to slow-twitch fibers, which is mediated by PKD [70]. This kinase phosphorylates class IIa HDACs, releasing their inhibition of MEF2, leading to transcriptional activation of myosin heavy chain genes that enables muscle fiber type transformation [71]. Moreover, disrupting expression of myostatin in mice results in a switch in muscle fiber type from slow to fast, in addition to muscle growth by recruiting the non-canonical, Ca2+-dependent Wnt pathway [72]. This may be triggered by a change in Ca2+ dynamics as a consequence of the reduction in sarcoplasmic Ca2+ release [73].
The precise dynamics of intracellular Ca2+ levels in muscle cells are crucial for specifying the stimuli-driven changes in muscle growth and performance through the coordination of Ca2+ influx and release from stores. Orai1 promotes growth and limits fatigue in adult skeletal muscle, while dominant negative Orai1 mice show increased susceptibility to fatigue [74]. Additionally, the burst of muscle growth and differentiation that occurs after birth in mice is dependent on the Ca2+ signaling regulated by STIM1 [75]. Excitation-contraction coupling is normal in mice lacking STIM1 from the skeletal muscle. However, muscle fibers of neonatal mSTIM1−/− mice fail to elicit Ca2+ transients evoked by tonic neurostimulation, resulting in inhibition of calcineurin, MAPKs, ERK1/2, and AKT signaling pathways. This suggests that the interaction between STIM1 and SOCE is necessary for neonatal muscle growth and differentiation [75]. An additional pathway that may participate in Ca2+-induced muscle plasticity is CaMKK which, when constitutively activated, promotes muscle growth by recruiting mTORC1 signaling and promotion of protein synthesis [76].
Another relevant aspect of muscle homeostasis is the limitation to growth and performance experienced during aging. Aging is accompanied by active muscle wasting through mechanisms that are not fully understood, but correlate with age-dependent changes in Ca2+ dynamics. Evidence for a relationship between Ca2+ signaling and aging muscle comes from studies on Ca2+ sparks, which consist on focalized Ca2+ release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum. In the young muscle Ca2+ sparks are not apparent at rest but are activated upon membrane deformation due to mechanical stimulation or osmotic stress [77, 78]. In contrast, in the aged skeletal muscle, the Ca2+ spark response is altered and there seems to be a segregated intracellular Ca2+ reserve that cannot be recruited by voltage-induced Ca2+ release, uncoupling Ca2+ dynamics from the excitation-contraction process [79]. This alteration in Ca2+ dynamics precedes muscle wasting and correlates with downregulation of mitsugumin-29 expression, a synaptophysin-related membrane protein important for muscle structure and function and Ca2+ homeostasis [79]. SOCE is also affected in the muscle of aged mice, presumably due to downregulation of mitsugumin-29 expression [80]. This protein interacts with TRPC3 [81, 82] and RyR1 and regulates apoptosis [83], providing a potential link between Ca2+ signaling and control of muscle homeostasis.
Muscle wasting is not exclusive to aging, but is shared by many physiological and pathological conditions. In metastatic cancer concurring with bone destruction, secreted transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) induces excessive oxidation of RyR1, resulting in leaky channels that interfere with Ca2+ signaling and muscle contraction. Preventing RyR leakage improves muscle function, suggesting that muscle weakness induced by pathological TGF-β signaling is due to decreased Ca2+-induced muscle force production [84]. Ca2+ sparks induced by membrane deformation and exercise in the young healthy muscle, which are decoupled in the aged muscle as mentioned above, are also deregulated and sustained irreversibly in the dystrophic muscle [78]. In a mouse model of muscular dystrophy, increased sarcolemma localization of a TRP channel, the growth factor-regulated channel, which results in Ca2+ overload in response to stretch, leads to muscle cell degeneration [85].
Skeletal muscle homeostasis relies on spatiotemporally regulated Ca2+ signaling in the different cell types involved in muscle plasticity. Aging and disease disables muscle homeostasis due to loss of the regulatory mechanisms dependent on appropriate Ca2+ dynamics.
4. Calcium signaling in muscle regeneration
Tissue regeneration involves a tightly orchestrated sequence of cellular events consisting of cell proliferation, migration, and differentiation, culminating in integration of cells into functional regenerating tissues. These cellular events are similar to the processes that occur during development (Figure 1) raising the question of whether the Ca2+ signaling-mediated mechanisms of muscle development are apparent in muscle regeneration.
In our recent study we found that spontaneous Ca2+ transients manifest in the early stages of muscle regeneration and that perturbing Ca2+ release from internal stores impairs the regenerative process. We discovered that muscle cells from the regenerating Xenopus laevis tail exhibit spontaneous Ca2+ transients during the first hours post injury [86].
Incubation of regenerating tadpoles with ryanodine, which abolishes Ca2+ transients in regenerating muscle cells, leads to a reduction in the number of muscle progenitor cells and activated muscle satellite cells in the regenerating tissue [86]. Muscle satellite cells are the major cell type that contributes to muscle repair and regeneration. When muscle is injured, activated muscle satellite cells proliferate and differentiate into skeletal muscle cells, giving rise to new tissue [87, 88]. Our findings suggest that perturbing Ca2+ release from RyR-operated stores interferes with the early phases of muscle regeneration, and that this Ca2+ activity is necessary for activation and proliferation of muscle satellite cells (Figure 2). In addition to RyR, release of Ca2+ from intracellular stores can be mediated by IP3R. Recently, investigators have determined that Ca2+ release mediated by IP3R type 1 is essential during the early steps of human myoblast differentiation [89], however our study found that Ca2+ transients in injured muscle were not IP3R-mediated and that IP3R function was not necessary for muscle regeneration [86], suggesting that muscle regeneration is mechanistically distinct from muscle development.
Unlike the dispensability of IP3R activation for muscle replenishment in injured tadpoles, regeneration of other tissues depends on IP3R-mediated signaling. For example, inhibition of IP3R expression in hepatocytes leads to a reduction in hepatocyte proliferation and delayed liver regeneration [90], showing its necessity for the early phases of repair. Another tissue in which Ca2+ activity is vital for development and regeneration is the skin. Proliferating keratinocytes of the epidermis facilitate adult skin homeostasis and participate in the wound healing process following injury [91–93]. Ca2+ is a key regulator in both keratinocyte differentiation and proliferation. At low intracellular Ca2+ levels, keratinocytes retain proliferative activity. At higher Ca2+ concentrations, proliferative activity is suppressed and keratinocytes express differentiation markers [94]. Ca2+ is also necessary in driving migration of basal keratinocytes. Loss of Orai1 results in inhibited directional migration of keratinocytes [95]. Moreover, expression of RyRs in human keratinocytes has been linked to keratinocyte differentiation and epidermal barrier homeostasis [96]. Application of a RyR agonist or antagonist delays or enhances skin barrier recovery respectively [96]. Further studies will help determine whether the importance of Ca2+ activity in regeneration is universal and will identify the particular Ca2+ dynamics that facilitate regeneration in different tissues. Other sources of Ca2+ response in activated muscle satellite cells during regeneration are the TRPCs. In cultured mouse muscle fibers hosting satellite cells the addition of fibroblast growth factor-2 induces an increase in intracellular Ca2+ levels in activated muscle satellite cells through TRPCs [97]. Full elucidation of the molecular mechanisms regulating Ca2+ dynamics in the activation of muscle satellite cells upon injury requires further investigation.
The downstream candidates recruited by Ca2+ activity during muscle regeneration are numerous (Figure 2), given the crosstalk nature of Ca2+ signaling. A central effector of Ca2+ dynamics, calcineurin, is expressed in activated and proliferating muscle satellite cells four days after injury in rodent leg muscles, while it is absent in quiescent counterparts [98]. Moreover, inhibiting calcineurin by injecting injured mice with cyclosporine impairs regeneration and leads to muscle fiber atrophy [98], suggesting a role for calcineurin in skeletal muscle repair. In addition, enhancing calcineurin activity by expressing a constitutively active form in a model of muscle injury in mice enhances structural and functional muscle regeneration, presumably through upregulation of the expression of myogenic genes like MEF-2 and myogenin [99]. In turn, calcineurin activity is tightly regulated by several modulatory proteins [100, 101] including myosporin, a scaffolding protein localized to the Z-disc/costamere region of striated muscle that inhibits calcineurin activity, prevents the slow fiber type switch normally associated with calcineurin action, and impairs regeneration of the injured muscle [102].
Another class of Ca2+-dependent phosphatases, calpains, also contributes to the control of muscle satellite cell activation [103]. Muscle satellite cells express m-calpain in a cell cycle-dependent manner, with m-calpain primarily localized to the cytoplasm in non-proliferating satellite cells. Upon injury, however, m-calpain localizes in the satellite cell nucleus. When m-calpain is inhibited, satellite cells show defects in cell cycle control. These defects lead to prevention of Myo-D accumulation in the nucleus and enhancement of Myf5 expression, subsequently impairing satellite cell function and the early stages of muscle regeneration [103].
Ca2+ signaling participation in skeletal muscle regeneration has become increasingly clear. However, further investigation is necessary to identify the Ca2+ dynamics specific to each type of cell participating in the repair and regeneration of the skeletal muscle. We also anticipate that elucidating the intra and intercellular signaling within the regenerating muscle and with adjacent and supporting tissues will prove important. The progressive loss of the muscle regenerative capacity with age indicates that some signaling mechanisms present in development are no longer available in the aging muscle. Indeed, the satellite cells of aged, injured muscle exhibit insufficient upregulation of the Notch ligand Delta, which is necessary for proliferative expansion of myogenic progenitors and muscle regeneration [104]. Interestingly, the crosstalk between Notch and Wnt signaling pathways is necessary for a temporal balance between myogenic progenitor proliferation and differentiation in adult myogenesis [105], while activation of the canonical Wnt signaling pathway in aged progenitors favors differentiation towards the fibrogenic instead of myogenic lineage, leading to tissue fibrosis and poor muscle regeneration [106]. A pivotal role for Ca2+ signaling is expected considering that it modulates both the Notch [107] and Wnt [108, 109] signaling pathways.
5. Concluding remarks
In this review we have discussed evidence that Ca2+ is an important component of the signaling promoting muscle formation, muscle homeostasis, and regeneration. In particular, Ca2+ changes may direct muscle satellite cells to maintain their quiescent state, proliferate, or differentiate into functional muscle. A full understanding of muscle satellite cell physiology is crucial to devising appropriate therapies to promote muscle regeneration and prevent muscle wasting in aging and disease. The spatiotemporal changes in Ca2+ dynamics and their signaling partners in muscle satellite cells of both young and aged tissue in response to external demands await further investigation.
Highlights.
Calcium regulates myoblast proliferation and differentiation during development
Injury-induced calcium signaling recruits satellite cells for muscle regeneration
Calcineurin, CaMKII, MAPK, CREB and NFATc transduce the calcium signal in muscle
Acknowledgments
Research in the lab has been supported by the Basil O’Connor Starter Scholar Research Award Grant 5-FY09-131 from the March of Dimes Foundation, Klingenstein Foundation Award in Neuroscience, NSF 1120796, NIH-NINDS R01NS073055 and Shriners Hospital for Children 86500-NCA and 85220-NCA grants, by a doctoral fellowship from the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine-UC Davis training program to MKT and by a postdoctoral fellowship from Shriners Hospital for Children to AMH.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Conflict of interest
None
References
- 1.Bentzinger CF, Wang YX, Rudnicki MA. Building muscle: molecular regulation of myogenesis. Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology. 2012;4 doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a008342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Dumont NA, Wang YX, Rudnicki MA. Intrinsic and extrinsic mechanisms regulating satellite cell function. Development. 2015;142:1572–1581. doi: 10.1242/dev.114223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Mauro A. Satellite cell of skeletal muscle fibers. The Journal of biophysical and biochemical cytology. 1961;9:493–495. doi: 10.1083/jcb.9.2.493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Relaix F, Zammit PS. Satellite cells are essential for skeletal muscle regeneration: the cell on the edge returns centre stage. Development. 2012;139:2845–2856. doi: 10.1242/dev.069088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Lee SJ, Huynh TV, Lee YS, Sebald SM, Wilcox-Adelman SA, Iwamori N, Lepper C, Matzuk MM, Fan CM. Role of satellite cells versus myofibers in muscle hypertrophy induced by inhibition of the myostatin/activin signaling pathway. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2012;109:E2353–E2360. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1206410109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Gunther S, Kim J, Kostin S, Lepper C, Fan CM, Braun T. Myf5-positive satellite cells contribute to Pax7-dependent long-term maintenance of adult muscle stem cells. Cell stem cell. 2013;13:590–601. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2013.07.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lepper C, Partridge TA, Fan CM. An absolute requirement for Pax7-positive satellite cells in acute injury-induced skeletal muscle regeneration. Development. 2011;138:3639–3646. doi: 10.1242/dev.067595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Sambasivan R, Yao R, Kissenpfennig A, Van Wittenberghe L, Paldi A, Gayraud-Morel B, Guenou H, Malissen B, Tajbakhsh S, Galy A. Pax7-expressing satellite cells are indispensable for adult skeletal muscle regeneration. Development. 2011;138:3647–3656. doi: 10.1242/dev.067587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.von Maltzahn J, Jones AE, Parks RJ, Rudnicki MA. Pax7 is critical for the normal function of satellite cells in adult skeletal muscle. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2013;110:16474–16479. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1307680110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Buckingham M, Relaix F. PAX3 and PAX7 as upstream regulators of myogenesis. Seminars in cell & developmental biology. 2015 doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2015.09.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bailey P, Holowacz T, Lassar AB. The origin of skeletal muscle stem cells in the embryo and the adult. Current opinion in cell biology. 2001;13:679–689. doi: 10.1016/s0955-0674(00)00271-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Buckingham M, Vincent SD. Distinct and dynamic myogenic populations in the vertebrate embryo. Current opinion in genetics & development. 2009;19:444–453. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2009.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hindi SM, Tajrishi MM, Kumar A. Signaling mechanisms in mammalian myoblast fusion. Science signaling. 2013;6:re2. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2003832. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Chen EH, Olson EN. Towards a molecular pathway for myoblast fusion in Drosophila. Trends in cell biology. 2004;14:452–460. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2004.07.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ho RK, Ball EE, Goodman CS. Muscle pioneers: large mesodermal cells that erect a scaffold for developing muscles and motoneurones in grasshopper embryos. Nature. 1983;301:66–69. doi: 10.1038/301066a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Rushton E, Drysdale R, Abmayr SM, Michelson AM, Bate M. Mutations in a novel gene, myoblast city, provide evidence in support of the founder cell hypothesis for Drosophila muscle development. Development. 1995;121:1979–1988. doi: 10.1242/dev.121.7.1979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Rosemblit N, Moschella MC, Ondriasa E, Gutstein DE, Ondrias K, Marks AR. Intracellular calcium release channel expression during embryogenesis. Dev Biol. 1999;206:163–177. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1998.9120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ferrari MB, Spitzer NC. Calcium signaling in the developing Xenopus myotome. Dev Biol. 1999;213:269–282. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1999.9387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ferrari MB, Rohrbough J, Spitzer NC. Spontaneous calcium transients regulate myofibrillogenesis in embryonic Xenopus myocytes. Dev Biol. 1996;178:484–497. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1996.0233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ferrari MB, Ribbeck K, Hagler DJ, Spitzer NC. A calcium signaling cascade essential for myosin thick filament assembly in Xenopus myocytes. The Journal of cell biology. 1998;141:1349–1356. doi: 10.1083/jcb.141.6.1349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Zvaritch E, Depreux F, Kraeva N, Loy RE, Goonasekera SA, Boncompagni S, Kraev A, Gramolini AO, Dirksen RT, Franzini-Armstrong C, Seidman CE, Seidman JG, Maclennan DH. An Ryr1I4895T mutation abolishes Ca2+ release channel function and delays development in homozygous offspring of a mutant mouse line. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2007;104:18537–18542. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0709312104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Konig S, Beguet A, Bader CR, Bernheim L. The calcineurin pathway links hyperpolarization (Kir2.1)-induced Ca2+ signals to human myoblast differentiation and fusion. Development. 2006;133:3107–3114. doi: 10.1242/dev.02479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Konig S, Hinard V, Arnaudeau S, Holzer N, Potter G, Bader CR, Bernheim L. Membrane hyperpolarization triggers myogenin and myocyte enhancer factor-2 expression during human myoblast differentiation. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2004;279:28187–28196. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M313932200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Liu JH, Konig S, Michel M, Arnaudeau S, Fischer-Lougheed J, Bader CR, Bernheim L. Acceleration of human myoblast fusion by depolarization: graded Ca2+ signals involved. Development. 2003;130:3437–3446. doi: 10.1242/dev.00562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Campbell NR, Podugu SP, Ferrari MB. Spatiotemporal characterization of short versus long duration calcium transients in embryonic muscle and their role in myofibrillogenesis. Dev Biol. 2006;292:253–264. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2005.11.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Seth M, Li T, Graham V, Burch J, Finch E, Stiber JA, Rosenberg PB. Dynamic regulation of sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca(2+) stores by stromal interaction molecule 1 and sarcolipin during muscle differentiation. Dev Dyn. 2012;241:639–647. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.23760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Stiber J, Hawkins A, Zhang ZS, Wang S, Burch J, Graham V, Ward CC, Seth M, Finch E, Malouf N, Williams RS, Eu JP, Rosenberg P. STIM1 signalling controls store-operated calcium entry required for development and contractile function in skeletal muscle. Nature cell biology. 2008;10:688–697. doi: 10.1038/ncb1731. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Louis M, Zanou N, Van Schoor M, Gailly P. TRPC1 regulates skeletal myoblast migration and differentiation. Journal of cell science. 2008;121:3951–3959. doi: 10.1242/jcs.037218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Formigli L, Sassoli C, Squecco R, Bini F, Martinesi M, Chellini F, Luciani G, Sbrana F, Zecchi-Orlandini S, Francini F, Meacci E. Regulation of transient receptor potential canonical channel 1 (TRPC1) by sphingosine 1-phosphate in C2C12 myoblasts and its relevance for a role of mechanotransduction in skeletal muscle differentiation. Journal of cell science. 2009;122:1322–1333. doi: 10.1242/jcs.035402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lu J, McKinsey TA, Nicol RL, Olson EN. Signal-dependent activation of the MEF2 transcription factor by dissociation from histone deacetylases. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2000;97:4070–4075. doi: 10.1073/pnas.080064097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Lu J, McKinsey TA, Zhang CL, Olson EN. Regulation of skeletal myogenesis by association of the MEF2 transcription factor with class II histone deacetylases. Molecular cell. 2000;6:233–244. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(00)00025-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Miska EA, Karlsson C, Langley E, Nielsen SJ, Pines J, Kouzarides T. HDAC4 deacetylase associates with and represses the MEF2 transcription factor. The EMBO journal. 1999;18:5099–5107. doi: 10.1093/emboj/18.18.5099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Sparrow DB, Miska EA, Langley E, Reynaud-Deonauth S, Kotecha S, Towers N, Spohr G, Kouzarides T, Mohun TJ. MEF-2 function is modified by a novel co-repressor, MITR. The EMBO journal. 1999;18:5085–5098. doi: 10.1093/emboj/18.18.5085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.McKinsey TA, Zhang CL, Lu J, Olson EN. Signal-dependent nuclear export of a histone deacetylase regulates muscle differentiation. Nature. 2000;408:106–111. doi: 10.1038/35040593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Friday BB, Mitchell PO, Kegley KM, Pavlath GK. Calcineurin initiates skeletal muscle differentiation by activating MEF2 and MyoD. Differentiation; research in biological diversity. 2003;71:217–227. doi: 10.1046/j.1432-0436.2003.710303.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Friday BB, Horsley V, Pavlath GK. Calcineurin activity is required for the initiation of skeletal muscle differentiation. The Journal of cell biology. 2000;149:657–666. doi: 10.1083/jcb.149.3.657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Abbott KL, Friday BB, Thaloor D, Murphy TJ, Pavlath GK. Activation and cellular localization of the cyclosporine A-sensitive transcription factor NF-AT in skeletal muscle cells. Molecular biology of the cell. 1998;9:2905–2916. doi: 10.1091/mbc.9.10.2905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Gajewski K, Wang J, Molkentin JD, Chen EH, Olson EN, Schulz RA. Requirement of the calcineurin subunit gene canB2 for indirect flight muscle formation in Drosophila. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2003;100:1040–1045. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0337662100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Chin ER, Olson EN, Richardson JA, Yang Q, Humphries C, Shelton JM, Wu H, Zhu W, Bassel-Duby R, Williams RS. A calcineurin-dependent transcriptional pathway controls skeletal muscle fiber type. Genes & development. 1998;12:2499–2509. doi: 10.1101/gad.12.16.2499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Bigard X, Sanchez H, Zoll J, Mateo P, Rousseau V, Veksler V, Ventura-Clapier R. Calcineurin Co-regulates contractile and metabolic components of slow muscle phenotype. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2000;275:19653–19660. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M000430200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Delling U, Tureckova J, Lim HW, De Windt LJ, Rotwein P, Molkentin JD. A calcineurin-NFATc3-dependent pathway regulates skeletal muscle differentiation and slow myosin heavy-chain expression. Molecular and cellular biology. 2000;20:6600–6611. doi: 10.1128/mcb.20.17.6600-6611.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Naya FJ, Mercer B, Shelton J, Richardson JA, Williams RS, Olson EN. Stimulation of slow skeletal muscle fiber gene expression by calcineurin in vivo. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2000;275:4545–4548. doi: 10.1074/jbc.275.7.4545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Schiaffino S, Serrano A. Calcineurin signaling and neural control of skeletal muscle fiber type and size. Trends in pharmacological sciences. 2002;23:569–575. doi: 10.1016/s0165-6147(02)02111-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Schulz RA, Yutzey KE. Calcineurin signaling and NFAT activation in cardiovascular and skeletal muscle development. Dev Biol. 2004;266:1–16. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2003.10.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Friday BB, Pavlath GK. A calcineurin- and NFAT-dependent pathway regulates Myf5 gene expression in skeletal muscle reserve cells. Journal of cell science. 2001;114:303–310. doi: 10.1242/jcs.114.2.303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Kegley KM, Gephart J, Warren GL, Pavlath GK. Altered primary myogenesis in NFATC3(−/−) mice leads to decreased muscle size in the adult. Dev Biol. 2001;232:115–126. doi: 10.1006/dbio.2001.0179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Horsley V, Friday BB, Matteson S, Kegley KM, Gephart J, Pavlath GK. Regulation of the growth of multinucleated muscle cells by an NFATC2-dependent pathway. The Journal of cell biology. 2001;153:329–338. doi: 10.1083/jcb.153.2.329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Horsley V, Jansen KM, Mills ST, Pavlath GK. IL-4 acts as a myoblast recruitment factor during mammalian muscle growth. Cell. 2003;113:483–494. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00319-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Bennett AM, Tonks NK. Regulation of distinct stages of skeletal muscle differentiation by mitogen-activated protein kinases. Science. 1997;278:1288–1291. doi: 10.1126/science.278.5341.1288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Zetser A, Frank D, Bengal E. MAP kinase converts MyoD into an instructive muscle differentiation factor in Xenopus. Dev Biol. 2001;240:168–181. doi: 10.1006/dbio.2001.0465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Zetser A, Gredinger E, Bengal E. p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway promotes skeletal muscle differentiation. Participation of the Mef2c transcription factor. The Journal of biological chemistry. 1999;274:5193–5200. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.8.5193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Agell N, Bachs O, Rocamora N, Villalonga P. Modulation of the Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK pathway by Ca(2+), and calmodulin. Cellular signalling. 2002;14:649–654. doi: 10.1016/s0898-6568(02)00007-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Swapna I, Borodinsky LN. Interplay between electrical activity and bone morphogenetic protein signaling regulates spinal neuron differentiation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2012;109:16336–16341. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1202818109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Kumar A, Khandelwal N, Malya R, Reid MB, Boriek AM. Loss of dystrophin causes aberrant mechanotransduction in skeletal muscle fibers. FASEB J. 2004;18:102–113. doi: 10.1096/fj.03-0453com. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Frost RA, Lang CH. Protein kinase B/Akt: a nexus of growth factor and cytokine signaling in determining muscle mass. J Appl Physiol. 1985;103(2007):378–387. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00089.2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Glass DJ. Skeletal muscle hypertrophy and atrophy signaling pathways. The international journal of biochemistry & cell biology. 2005;37:1974–1984. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2005.04.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Rommel C, Bodine SC, Clarke BA, Rossman R, Nunez L, Stitt TN, Yancopoulos GD, Glass DJ. Mediation of IGF-1-induced skeletal myotube hypertrophy by PI(3)K/Akt/mTOR and PI(3)K/Akt/GSK3 pathways. Nature cell biology. 2001;3:1009–1013. doi: 10.1038/ncb1101-1009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Talmadge RJ, Otis JS, Rittler MR, Garcia ND, Spencer SR, Lees SJ, Naya FJ. Calcineurin activation influences muscle phenotype in a muscle-specific fashion. BMC cell biology. 2004;5:28. doi: 10.1186/1471-2121-5-28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Parsons SA, Wilkins BJ, Bueno OF, Molkentin JD. Altered skeletal muscle phenotypes in calcineurin Aalpha and Abeta gene-targeted mice. Molecular and cellular biology. 2003;23:4331–4343. doi: 10.1128/MCB.23.12.4331-4343.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Oh M, Rybkin, Copeland V, Czubryt MP, Shelton JM, van Rooij E, Richardson JA, Hill JA, De Windt LJ, Bassel-Duby R, Olson EN, Rothermel BA. Calcineurin is necessary for the maintenance but not embryonic development of slow muscle fibers. Molecular and cellular biology. 2005;25:6629–6638. doi: 10.1128/MCB.25.15.6629-6638.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Parsons SA, Millay DP, Wilkins BJ, Bueno OF, Tsika GL, Neilson JR, Liberatore CM, Yutzey KE, Crabtree GR, Tsika RW, Molkentin JD. Genetic loss of calcineurin blocks mechanical overload-induced skeletal muscle fiber type switching but not hypertrophy. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2004;279:26192–26200. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M313800200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Bruton JD, Katz A, Westerblad H. Insulin increases near-membrane but not global Ca2+ in isolated skeletal muscle. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1999;96:3281–3286. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.6.3281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Contreras-Ferrat A, Lavandero S, Jaimovich E, Klip A. Calcium signaling in insulin action on striated muscle. Cell calcium. 2014;56:390–396. doi: 10.1016/j.ceca.2014.08.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Espinosa A, Estrada M, Jaimovich E. IGF-I and insulin induce different intracellular calcium signals in skeletal muscle cells. The Journal of endocrinology. 2004;182:339–352. doi: 10.1677/joe.0.1820339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Horsley V, Pavlath GK. Prostaglandin F2(alpha) stimulates growth of skeletal muscle cells via an NFATC2-dependent pathway. The Journal of cell biology. 2003;161:111–118. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200208085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Formigli L, Meacci E, Sassoli C, Squecco R, Nosi D, Chellini F, Naro F, Francini F, Zecchi-Orlandini S. Cytoskeleton/stretch-activated ion channel interaction regulates myogenic differentiation of skeletal myoblasts. J Cell Physiol. 2007;211:296–306. doi: 10.1002/jcp.20936. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Hara M, Tabata K, Suzuki T, Do MK, Mizunoya W, Nakamura M, Nishimura S, Tabata S, Ikeuchi Y, Sunagawa K, Anderson JE, Allen RE, Tatsumi R. Calcium influx through a possible coupling of cation channels impacts skeletal muscle satellite cell activation in response to mechanical stretch. American journal of physiology. Cell physiology. 2012;302:C1741–C1750. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00068.2012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Burkholder TJ. Stretch-induced ERK2 phosphorylation requires PLA2 activity in skeletal myotubes. Biochemical and biophysical research communications. 2009;386:60–64. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.05.150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Carrasco MA, Riveros N, Rios J, Muller M, Torres F, Pineda J, Lantadilla S, Jaimovich E. Depolarization-induced slow calcium transients activate early genes in skeletal muscle cells. American journal of physiology. Cell physiology. 2003;284:C1438–C1447. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00117.2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Ellwanger K, Kienzle C, Lutz S, Jin ZG, Wiekowski MT, Pfizenmaier K, Hausser A. Protein kinase D controls voluntary-running-induced skeletal muscle remodelling. The Biochemical journal. 2011;440:327–324. doi: 10.1042/BJ20101980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Kim MS, Fielitz J, McAnally J, Shelton JM, Lemon DD, McKinsey TA, Richardson JA, Bassel-Duby R, Olson EN. Protein kinase D1 stimulates MEF2 activity in skeletal muscle and enhances muscle performance. Molecular and cellular biology. 2008;28:3600–3609. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00189-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Steelman CA, Recknor JC, Nettleton D, Reecy JM. Transcriptional profiling of myostatin-knockout mice implicates Wnt signaling in postnatal skeletal muscle growth and hypertrophy. FASEB J. 2006;20:580–582. doi: 10.1096/fj.05-5125fje. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Bodnar D, Geyer N, Ruzsnavszky O, Olah T, Hegyi B, Sztretye M, Fodor J, Dienes B, Balogh A, Papp Z, Szabo L, Muller G, Csernoch L, Szentesi P. Hypermuscular mice with mutation in the myostatin gene display altered calcium signalling. The Journal of physiology. 2014;592:1353–1365. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2013.261958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Wei-Lapierre L, Carrell EM, Boncompagni S, Protasi F, Dirksen RT. Orai1-dependent calcium entry promotes skeletal muscle growth and limits fatigue. Nature communications. 2013;4:2805. doi: 10.1038/ncomms3805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Li T, Finch EA, Graham V, Zhang ZS, Ding JD, Burch J, Oh-hora M, Rosenberg P. STIM1-Ca(2+) signaling is required for the hypertrophic growth of skeletal muscle in mice. Molecular and cellular biology. 2012;32:3009–3017. doi: 10.1128/MCB.06599-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Ferey JL, Brault JJ, Smith CA, Witczak CA. Constitutive activation of CaMKKalpha signaling is sufficient but not necessary for mTORC1 activation and growth in mouse skeletal muscle. American journal of physiology. Endocrinology and metabolism. 2014;307:E686–E694. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00322.2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Klein MG, Cheng H, Santana LF, Jiang YH, Lederer WJ, Schneider MF. Two mechanisms of quantized calcium release in skeletal muscle. Nature. 1996;379:455–458. doi: 10.1038/379455a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Wang X, Weisleder N, Collet C, Zhou J, Chu Y, Hirata Y, Zhao X, Pan Z, Brotto M, Cheng H, Ma J. Uncontrolled calcium sparks act as a dystrophic signal for mammalian skeletal muscle. Nature cell biology. 2005;7:525–530. doi: 10.1038/ncb1254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Weisleder N, Brotto M, Komazaki S, Pan Z, Zhao X, Nosek T, Parness J, Takeshima H, Ma J. Muscle aging is associated with compromised Ca2+ spark signaling and segregated intracellular Ca2+ release. The Journal of cell biology. 2006;174:639–645. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200604166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Zhao X, Weisleder N, Thornton A, Oppong Y, Campbell R, Ma J, Brotto M. Compromised store-operated Ca2+ entry in aged skeletal muscle. Aging cell. 2008;7:561–568. doi: 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2008.00408.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Woo JS, Hwang JH, Huang M, Ahn MK, Cho CH, Ma J, Lee EH. Interaction between mitsugumin 29 and TRPC3 participates in regulating Ca(2+) transients in skeletal muscle. Biochemical and biophysical research communications. 2015;464:133–139. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.06.096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Woo JS, Kim do H, Allen PD, Lee EH. TRPC3-interacting triadic proteins in skeletal muscle. The Biochemical journal. 2008;411:399–405. doi: 10.1042/bj20071504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Pan Z, Hirata Y, Nagaraj RY, Zhao J, Nishi M, Hayek SM, Bhat MB, Takeshima H, Ma J. Co-expression of MG29 and ryanodine receptor leads to apoptotic cell death: effect mediated by intracellular Ca2+ release. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2004;279:19387–19390. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C400030200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Waning DL, Mohammad KS, Reiken S, Xie W, Andersson DC, John S, Chiechi A, Wright LE, Umanskaya A, Niewolna M, Trivedi T, Charkhzarrin S, Khatiwada P, Wronska A, Haynes A, Benassi MS, Witzmann FA, Zhen G, Wang X, Cao X, Roodman GD, Marks AR, Guise TA. Excess TGF-beta mediates muscle weakness associated with bone metastases in mice. Nature medicine. 2015;21:1262–1271. doi: 10.1038/nm.3961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Iwata Y, Katanosaka Y, Arai Y, Komamura K, Miyatake K, Shigekawa M. A novel mechanism of myocyte degeneration involving the Ca2+-permeable growth factor-regulated channel. The Journal of cell biology. 2003;161:957–967. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200301101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Tu MK, Borodinsky LN. Spontaneous calcium transients manifest in the regenerating muscle and are necessary for skeletal muscle replenishment. Cell calcium. 2014;56:34–41. doi: 10.1016/j.ceca.2014.04.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Dumont NA, Bentzinger CF, Sincennes MC, Rudnicki MA. Satellite Cells and Skeletal Muscle Regeneration. Comprehensive Physiology. 2015;5:1027–1059. doi: 10.1002/cphy.c140068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Montarras D, Morgan J, Collins C, Relaix F, Zaffran S, Cumano A, Partridge T, Buckingham M. Direct isolation of satellite cells for skeletal muscle regeneration. Science. 2005;309:2064–2067. doi: 10.1126/science.1114758. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Antigny F, Konig S, Bernheim L, Frieden M. Inositol 1,4,5 trisphosphate receptor 1 is a key player of human myoblast differentiation. Cell calcium. 2014;56:513–521. doi: 10.1016/j.ceca.2014.10.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Oliveira AG, Andrade VA, Guimaraes ES, Florentino RM, Sousa PA, Marques PE, Melo FM, Ortega MJ, Menezes GB, Leite MF. Calcium signalling from the type I inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor is required at early phase of liver regeneration. Liver Int. 2015;35:1162–1171. doi: 10.1111/liv.12587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Tumbar T, Guasch G, Greco V, Blanpain C, Lowry WE, Rendl M, Fuchs E. Defining the epithelial stem cell niche in skin. Science. 2004;303:359–363. doi: 10.1126/science.1092436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Blanpain C, Fuchs E. Stem cell plasticity. Plasticity of epithelial stem cells in tissue regeneration. Science. 2014;344:1242281. doi: 10.1126/science.1242281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Blanpain C, Lowry WE, Geoghegan A, Polak L, Fuchs E. Self-renewal, multipotency, and the existence of two cell populations within an epithelial stem cell niche. Cell. 2004;118:635–648. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2004.08.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Lansdown AB. Calcium: a potential central regulator in wound healing in the skin. Wound Repair Regen. 2002;10:271–285. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-475x.2002.10502.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Vandenberghe M, Raphael M, Lehen'kyi V, Gordienko D, Hastie R, Oddos T, Rao A, Hogan PG, Skryma R, Prevarskaya N. ORAI1 calcium channel orchestrates skin homeostasis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2013;110:E4839–E4848. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1310394110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Denda S, Kumamoto J, Takei K, Tsutsumi M, Aoki H, Denda M. Ryanodine receptors are expressed in epidermal keratinocytes and associated with keratinocyte differentiation and epidermal permeability barrier homeostasis. J Invest Dermatol. 2012;132:69–75. doi: 10.1038/jid.2011.256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Liu Y, Schneider MF. FGF2 activates TRPC and Ca(2+) signaling leading to satellite cell activation. Frontiers in physiology. 2014;5:38. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2014.00038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Sakuma K, Nishikawa J, Nakao R, Watanabe K, Totsuka T, Nakano H, Sano M, Yasuhara M. Calcineurin is a potent regulator for skeletal muscle regeneration by association with NFATc1 and GATA-2. Acta neuropathologica. 2003;105:271–280. doi: 10.1007/s00401-002-0647-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Stupka N, Schertzer JD, Bassel-Duby R, Olson EN, Lynch GS. Calcineurin-A alpha activation enhances the structure and function of regenerating muscles after myotoxic injury. American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology. 2007;293:R686–R694. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00612.2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Vega RB, Bassel-Duby R, Olson EN. Control of cardiac growth and function by calcineurin signaling. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2003;278:36981–36984. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R300023200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Vega RB, Rothermel BA, Weinheimer CJ, Kovacs A, Naseem RH, Bassel-Duby R, Williams RS, Olson EN. Dual roles of modulatory calcineurin-interacting protein 1 in cardiac hypertrophy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2003;100:669–674. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0237225100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Kielbasa OM, Reynolds JG, Wu CL, Snyder CM, Cho MY, Weiler H, Kandarian S, Naya FJ. Myospryn is a calcineurin-interacting protein that negatively modulates slow-fiber-type transformation and skeletal muscle regeneration. FASEB J. 2011;25:2276–2286. doi: 10.1096/fj.10-169219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Raynaud F, Carnac G, Marcilhac A, Benyamin Y. m-Calpain implication in cell cycle during muscle precursor cell activation. Experimental cell research. 2004;298:48–57. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2004.03.053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Conboy IM, Conboy MJ, Smythe GM, Rando TA. Notch-mediated restoration of regenerative potential to aged muscle. Science. 2003;302:1575–1577. doi: 10.1126/science.1087573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Brack AS, Conboy IM, Conboy MJ, Shen J, Rando TA. A temporal switch from notch to Wnt signaling in muscle stem cells is necessary for normal adult myogenesis. Cell stem cell. 2008;2:50–59. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2007.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Brack AS, Conboy MJ, Roy S, Lee M, Kuo CJ, Keller C, Rando TA. Increased Wnt signaling during aging alters muscle stem cell fate and increases fibrosis. Science. 2007;317:807–810. doi: 10.1126/science.1144090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Pai VP, Lemire JM, Pare JF, Lin G, Chen Y, Levin M. Endogenous gradients of resting potential instructively pattern embryonic neural tissue via Notch signaling and regulation of proliferation. The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 2015;35:4366–4385. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1877-14.2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Freisinger CM, Schneider I, Westfall TA, Slusarski DC. Calcium dynamics integrated into signalling pathways that influence vertebrate axial patterning. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2008;363:1377–1385. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2007.2255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Nusse R. Wnt signaling. Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology. 2012;4 doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a011163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]



