Abstract
Urinary stone disease is a very common disease whose prevalence is still increasing. Stone formation is frequently associated with other diseases of affluence such as hypertension, osteoporosis, cardiovascular disease, metabolic syndrome, and insulin resistance. The increasing concentration of lithogenic solutes along the different segments of the nephron involves supersaturation conditions leading to the formation, growth, and aggregation of crystals. Crystalline aggregates can grow free in the tubular lumen or coated on the wall of the renal tubule. Plugs of crystalline material have been highlighted in the tubular lumen in some patients, but crystalline growth starting from plaques of calcium phosphate within the renal papillae has been demonstrated in others. Urinary supersaturation is the result of a complex interaction between predisposing genetic features and environmental factors. Dietary intake is certainly the most important environmental risk factor. In particular, an insufficient intake of dietary calcium (<600 mg/day) can increase the intestinal absorption of oxalate and the risk of calcium oxalate stone formation. Other possible risk factors that have been identified include excessive intake of salt and proteins. The potential role of dietary acid load seems to play an important role in causing a state of subclinical chronic acidosis; therefore, the intake of vegetables is encouraged in stone-forming patients. Consumption of sugar-sweetened soda and punch is associated with a higher risk of stone formation, whereas consumption of coffee, tea, beer, wine, and orange juice is associated with a lower risk. A high fluid intake is widely recognized as the cornerstone of prevention of all forms of stones. The effectiveness of protein and salt restriction has been evaluated in some studies that still do not allow definitive conclusions to be made. Calcium stone formation can be prevented by the use of different drugs with different mechanisms of action (thiazide diuretics, allopurinol, and potassium citrate), but there is no ideal drug that is both risk free and well tolerated.
Keywords: nephrolithiasis, nephrocalcinosis, Urinary stone disease, renal stone, nephron
Introduction
Urinary stone disease is the formation or the presence of concretions in the urinary tract. Stones have different compositions (mainly calcium) and tend to recur, requiring iterative treatments. Urinary stone disease is very common, and its prevalence is still increasing. At least one in ten of the potential readers of this article has already experienced a stone episode or could experience it during their lives. This global epidemic of the disease is even more relevant because it is associated with the increasing prevalence of other non-communicable diseases as the result of the epochal changes in the lifestyle of the world's population.
Urolithiasis is the result of a complex interaction between genetic and environmental factors, and current research is oriented in these two directions, which should enable us to study genetic aspects in combination with environmental exposures. Another unique aspect of this fascinating field of research is the convergence of interests of various specialists in a single subject. Researchers from different backgrounds (chemists, epidemiologists, dieticians, geneticists, pathologists, radiologists, nephrologists, and urologists) come together at the same conferences, they publish in the same magazines and write books together, and they form what we jokingly call "the stone family".
The most important aspects of this research are the epidemiology of the disease, the association with other diseases, the genetics behind the disease, the influence of diet and other environmental factors, and the different ways of preventing the disease.
Epidemiology
Over the past 20 years, the world epidemiology of urolithiasis has undergone major changes 1– 4 related to several factors, such as aging of the population and changes in the lifestyle of the female youth population (low intake of fruits and vegetables and higher consumption of simple sugars and foods with high protein and salt content) 5 in Western countries and the westernization of dietary habits and lifestyle in developing countries. In the countries of northern Europe and America, the prevalence values reached a plateau in the late 1980s up to values of 15–20%. Subsequently, no further increases were recorded, although changes were observed in the distribution between males and females and the age of onset of the disease. The prevalence of the disease in women tends to rise and to equal that in men as a result of the more frequent onset of the disease among women aged <30 years. Calcium oxalate is still by far the most frequent composition of urinary calculi, but also uric acid calculi tend to increase as a result of aging of the population and increasing penetration of the metabolic syndrome. On the contrary, infection stones tend to be less frequent as a result of improving health in the population and better methods of treatment of kidney stones. In non-Western countries, particularly in North Africa, the Middle East, India, and China, the prevalence of urolithiasis is increasing with the change of lifestyle due to the improvement of socio-economic conditions and globalization. The warmer climate in the so-called "stone belt" contributes to the rapid increase in prevalence in these regions. Global warming could pose a global climate change that could further increase the prevalence of urolithiasis, even in areas with a more temperate climate.
Related diseases
Renal stone formation is frequently associated with other diseases of affluence. Calcium stone formation characterized by alterations in the metabolic regulation of calcium and sodium is frequently associated with hypertension, osteoporosis, and cardiovascular disease, whereas uric acid stones (but to some extent calcium stones too) are often linked to the metabolic syndrome and insulin resistance. In a large cohort of >50,000 men, the risk of hypertension was increased in renal stone formers (odds ratio [OR] 1.31) 6, and in another cohort of 90,000 women the risk of a new diagnosis of hypertension was higher in subjects with a history of nephrolithiasis (relative risk [RR] 1.36) 7. The link between the two diseases has been identified in common alterations of calcium metabolism 8. A history of renal stones was associated with lower bone mineral density in a cross-sectional study of 5995 men >65 years old 9, and in another national cross-sectional study in the US, bone mineral density of the femoral neck was found to be lower in men with renal stone history after adjusting for age, body mass index, race, and other potential confounders 10. In large cohorts of renal stone formers, the risk of myocardial infarction (+31-78%), angina (+61%), and carotid artery atherosclerosis (+60%) was increased, even after adjustment for other known risk factors 11– 14. Renal stone formers have increased arterial stiffness, higher arterial calcification score, and reduced bone density 15, 16, a complex of findings which has been observed in other conditions—hypertension, osteoporosis, and chronic kidney disease (CKD)—and which may suggest that the vessel wall acts as a buffer for the excessive quantity of calcium coming from high bone turnover. The increased arterial calcification and stiffness may explain the higher cardiovascular risk observed in stone formers. Renal stone formers are often overweight or obese. In three large prospective cohorts of nearly 250,000 individuals in the US, the RR for incident stone formation in subjects >100 kg was 1.44 in men, 1.89 in older women, and 1.92 in younger women 17. In subjects with metabolic syndrome (impaired fasting glucose, elevated blood pressure, dyslipidemia, and central obesity), the prevalence of nephrolithiasis is high with an increased risk of stone formation in men (OR 2.1) and in women (OR 4.9) 18. Idiopathic uric acid nephrolithiasis has been regarded as a renal manifestation of the metabolic syndrome because of the impaired renal production and transport of ammonia that could be related to insulin resistance 19, 20. Also, the risk of calcium stone formation increases with the number of features of the metabolic syndrome, although further studies are necessary to establish a clear relationship between calcium nephrolithiasis and metabolic syndrome/cardiovascular risk and to disclose the potential mechanisms 21, 22.
Pathogenesis
The formation of kidney stones has been explained by different pathophysiological mechanisms 23. Urinary calculi originate from the formation of crystals in the urine, which is a complex solution of various solutes. When the urine becomes supersaturated due to a low urine volume or excessive excretion of solutes, crystalline formation begins. The crystals may grow gradually or aggregate. Formation, growth, and aggregation of crystals may be influenced by substances present in the urine which act as promoters or inhibitors of crystallization. A lack of crystallization inhibitors (magnesium, citrate, and macromolecules) can be the origin of kidney stone formation. Crystallization starts in the renal parenchyma in ways that are not completely known.
Free or fixed particle theory
The increasing concentration of lithogenic solutes along the different segments of the nephron involves supersaturation conditions leading to the formation, growth, and aggregation of crystals that might get trapped in the tubular lumen and begin the process of stone formation. The phenomenon could start with crystalline aggregates free in the tubular lumen (free particle theory) or coated on the wall of the tubule (fixed particle theory). The speed of growth of the crystalline aggregates, the diameter of the different segments of the nephron, and the transit time in the nephron are crucial elements in justifying one theory or the other 24. Plugs of crystalline material were highlighted with histopathological examinations in the tubular lumen of patients with brushite stones or stones associated with hyperparathyroidism, renal tubular acidosis, hyperoxaluria secondary to intestinal surgery (bypass for obesity, ileal resection, or ileostomy), or cystinuria.
Randall’s plaques
An alternative mechanism to the crystalline growth within the tubules is crystalline growth starting from plaques of calcium phosphate in the interstitium within the renal papillae. The presence of small plaques of crystalline material in the papillae of the renal calyces, which has been identified as a pre-lithiasic condition (Randall’s plaques), was described in the 1930s 25. In more recent years, this observation has been re-evaluated and the nature of these changes has been better investigated by endoscopic observations of the renal cavities in vivo or by micro-computed tomography (CT) analysis of the structure of stones. The origin of the plaques is still under discussion because they may be derived from the basement membrane of the loop of Henle 26 or from deeper structures such as the basal membrane of the collecting tubules and vasa recta 27. An intervention in the pathogenesis of Randall's plaque of interstitial cells with the capacity to transdifferentiate along the bone lineage has also been suggested 28– 30.
Urinary risk factors for urolithiasis
In the 1960s and 1970s, many studies identified several possible risk factors for stone formation in the composition of the urine of renal stone formers 31, 32. For calcium stones (oxalate and calcium phosphate), the main risk factors were identified in high concentrations of calcium and oxalate, which are the main components of these stones, and a lower excretion of magnesium and citrate, which act as inhibitors of crystallization. In calcium oxalate stone formation, increases in urinary oxalate are more relevant than increases of urinary calcium because calcium is present in 10−20-fold higher concentrations in urine and calcium oxalate crystallization occurs in a 1:1 molar ratio. This implies that isolated increases in urinary calcium will not produce more particles 33, whereas increases of oxalate produced by a dietary load of oxalate may produce microliths within 24 hours, even in non-stone former subjects 34. On the other hand, due to the excess of urinary concentrations of phosphate (from bone and protein metabolism), an increase of urinary calcium will tend to produce calcium phosphate microliths. Inadequate urinary output is another major risk factor, whereas pH values of >7 tend to increase the crystallization of calcium phosphate. For calculi of uric acid, an excessive excretion of uric acid and undue acidic urinary pH are the most important risk factors. In fact, low urinary pH increases the concentration of the insoluble undissociated uric acid.
In some cases, these changes in urinary composition are caused by well-identifiable diseases. Excessive calcium excretion is a characteristic feature of primary hyperparathyroidism, sarcoidosis, prolonged immobilization, and other bone diseases. Hyperoxaluria can be observed in some congenital abnormalities of metabolism (primary hyperoxaluria) and some acquired forms (inflammatory bowel disease and results of bariatric surgery). Finally, some drugs cause high concentrations of calcium (loop diuretics), oxalate (orlistat), or urate (losartan); others cause increased concentrations of urinary calcium in association with increased urinary pH and lower urinary citrate (acetazolamide, topiramate, and zonisamide) or reduce the concentration of inhibitors such as citrate (thiazide diuretics and angiotensin-converting enzyme [ACE] inhibitors).
The pathogenic mechanisms for unduly urinary pH in uric acid stone formers are increased net acid excretion (NAE) and reduced renal ammonium (NH 4+). The production and transport of ammonia could be impaired by insulin resistance, whereas the underlying mechanism of increased acid production has still to be fully elucidated.
Infection stones are caused by definite urinary abnormalities secondary to infection by urease-producing bacteria. Proteus species and to a lesser extent Klebsiella and Enterobacter species present with an enzymatic activity which cleaves the urea present in the urine into ammonium and bicarbonate. The alkalinity and the high urinary concentrations of ammonium cause the crystallization of magnesium ammonium phosphate (struvite) with formation of large stones that may fill the renal cavities (staghorn stones). The infection by urease producers is often favored by congenital or acquired alterations of the urinary tract, causing stasis of the urine and leading to the appearance and maintenance of infection.
Other types of stones (cystine, xanthine, and dihydroxyadenine) are caused by specific congenital metabolic defects that cause excessive excretion of these poorly soluble substances that tend to precipitate. Finally, some stones are caused by the precipitation of medications themselves (indinavir and other antiretroviral drugs) under conditions of reduced urinary output. However, in the great majority of cases, the alterations in the composition of the urine are not associated with specific diseases and are defined as idiopathic nephrolithiasis. In these cases, the causes of the disease are related to exposure to environmental factors in genetically predisposed subjects.
Genetics
Specific types of nephrolithiasis are clearly linked to some monogenic hereditary alterations, which account for nearly 2% of renal stone cases in adults and 10% in children 35. Cystinuria is a defect in tubular reabsorption of cystine and dibasic amino acids, which results in the frequent recurrent formation of stones composed of cystine. Inborn errors of the metabolism of oxalate (primary hyperoxalurias) result in the recurrent formation of calcium oxalate stones and crystal deposition in the renal parenchyma with associated progressive renal failure. Monogenic alterations of purine metabolism can also cause stones of uric acid or other purines (2,8-dihydroxyadenine or xanthine), crystal renal deposition, and progressive renal failure. A group of congenital tubulopathies affecting the convoluted proximal tubule (such as Dent's disease, Lowe syndrome, or hypophosphatemic rickets), the thick ascending limb of the loop of Henle (such as familial hypomagnesemia and Bartter's syndrome), or the distal part of the nephron (congenital distal tubular acidosis with or without hearing loss) are associated with calcium phosphate stone formation, nephrocalcinosis, extensive tubulointerstitial fibrosis, and a significant risk of progressing toward end-stage renal disease. Recurrent calcium stones associated with medullary sponge kidney (MSK) may be associated with an autosomal dominant mutation of a still unknown gene 36. One of the most interesting candidate genes is GDNF, a gene involved in renal morphogenesis 37. For all these diseases, it is now possible to make a precise genetic diagnosis with the identification of specific mutations; however, they are sometimes misdiagnosed or diagnosed late because the clinical presentation is not recognized 38. Also, in the most common idiopathic calcium stone disease, a genetic basis is very likely because only a proportion of those exposed to the same environmental risk factors present with the disease.
The familial association of idiopathic calcium stone disease has been demonstrated by numerous studies, although the specific genetic and epigenetic factors have remained less clear. Calcium stone disease seems to be a genetically heterogeneous disease related to multiple genetic factors that regulate the excretion of the different urinary risk factors. Family-based or case-control studies of single-candidate genes showed gene polymorphisms related to stone formation for calcium-sensing receptor, vitamin D receptor, Na +/dicarboxylate cotransporter-1, and osteopontin 39, 40. A recent genome-wide association study in a large cohort of hypercalciuric stone formers from Iceland and the Netherlands identified the claudin 14 ( CLDN14) gene as a possible major gene of nephrolithiasis 41.
Environmental factors
Dietary intake is certainly the most important environmental risk factor. Several studies of large cohorts of prospectively studied subjects showed some possible associations between the levels of intake of some nutrients and the risk of forming kidney stones. In particular, an insufficient intake of dietary calcium (<600 mg/day) can increase the intestinal absorption of oxalate with increased saturation values for urinary calcium oxalate and the risk of calcium oxalate stone formation 42. Other possible risk factors that have been identified include excessive intake of salt and proteins 43. The potential role of the acid load of the diet, related to the content in animal protein and the relationship between intake of calcium, magnesium, and potassium and that of chlorine and phosphates, seems to play an important role in causing a state of subclinical chronic acidosis and the consequent excessive mobilization of calcium from bone and its excretion in the urine 44– 47. For this reason, the intake of vegetables in association with the reduction in salt is encouraged in stone-forming patients. Consumption of sugar-sweetened soda and punch is associated with a higher risk of stone formation, whereas consumption of coffee, tea, beer, wine, and orange juice is associated with a lower risk 48, 49.
Environment and lifestyle
People living in hot climates or who are exposed to high temperatures at work are at increased stone risk due to reduced urinary diuresis. Physical inactivity appears to be a risk factor for urinary stones, while moderate and constant physical activity seems sufficient to reduce the risk of forming kidney stones. However, the link between physical activity and risk of kidney stones is still uncertain and needs to be further investigated 50.
Treatment of kidney stones
Over the last 40 years, the methods of stone removal from the urinary tract have benefited from technological innovations that have revolutionized the treatment of the disease and reduced its morbidity. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and endoscopic techniques of intracorporeal lithotripsy (percutaneous and retrograde) have made the treatment of kidney stones minimally invasive and easily repeatable. Conversely, medical treatment was not substantially improved. Despite increased knowledge about the pathogenesis and predisposing diseases and risk factors, the current modality of dietary and pharmacological treatment and their results are still unsatisfactory.
Fluid intake
A high fluid intake is widely recognized as the cornerstone of prevention of all forms of stones, although only one randomized trial has confirmed the effectiveness of this preventive measure (RR = 0.45) 51. A reduction in the consumption of soft drinks significantly reduces the risk of lithiasis (RR = 0.83) 52.
Diet
Numerous studies have shown the effects of different types of nutritional intervention on urinary risk factors for the formation of kidney stones, but the evidence from randomized trials is still low and of uncertain meaning 53. The effectiveness of protein restriction has been evaluated in several studies that still do not allow definitive conclusions to be made owing to the heterogeneity of experimental designs. Protein restriction alone was compared with that of a diet with high fiber content without demonstrating significant differences 54. Conversely, protein restriction in combination with salt restriction and a calcium intake normalized according to the levels of intake recommended for the general population was more effective than a low-calcium diet 55. However, in this last study, the effect of the reduction in protein intake cannot be distinguished from that of salt restriction and, in turn, the overall effect of this diet cannot be well estimated because the control group was on a diet potentially favoring the formation of stones. Other controlled studies have used multiple variables and dietary interventions that make interpretation difficult. Randomized trials evaluating more specific and targeted interventions are required to obtain more robust information on the effectiveness of dietary treatment of kidney stones. However, the unpredictable nature of nephrolithiasis, its complexity and heterogeneity, and, last but not least, lack of interest from pharmaceutical companies make these studies very difficult to perform.
Pharmacological prevention
The treatment and prophylaxis of kidney stones find their foundations in numerous studies dating back to over 30 years ago. The mechanisms of action and effects of several pharmacological measures on several urinary risk factors have been well studied, but unfortunately clinical evidence from randomized controlled studies is still scarce 53. Uric acid stones can be dissolved with an oral alkalinizing therapy by means of potassium bicarbonate or potassium/sodium citrate 56. The prevention of this type of stone is based on the long-term taking of citrate. Calcium stone formation can be prevented by the use of different drugs with different mechanisms of action, such as thiazide diuretics, allopurinol, phosphates, and potassium citrate. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials 53 showed that thiazide diuretics (five studies) may reduce the risk of stone formation by 48% (RR = 0.52) and that the association with allopurinol (RR = 0.79) or with citrates (RR = 0.94) does not significantly increase the effectiveness of these drugs. The use of thiazides is, however, limited by the fear of side effects in the long term. The major concerns about their use arise from their tendency to cause hypokalemia, impaired glucose tolerance, and increases in serum cholesterol and serum uric acid 57. Citrates (four studies) may reduce the risk of recurrence by 75% (RR = 0.25) and allopurinol (two studies) of 41% (RR = 0.59) 53. Citrates are devoid of potentially serious side effects and may have a favorable impact on low bone density, which is frequently observed in the calcium stone patient, but are poorly tolerated for their digestive effects. On the other hand, although in rare cases, allopurinol may cause severe hypersensitive reactions 58. Finally, the results of the use of magnesium (one study) were not significant. In conclusion, although there are several options for the pharmacological prevention of nephrolithiasis, there is no ideal drug that is both risk free and well tolerated. Finally, compliance to a prolonged pharmacological treatment remains a serious limitation of all forms of long-term treatment for a chronic disease, for which treatment effectiveness is conditioned by an efficient follow-up organization.
Conclusions
The most important future objectives of renal stone research are epidemiological studies that investigate simultaneously the genetic aspects and the diets of stone patients, studies aimed at correlating the morphological endoscopic and histological aspects of renal papillae with stone composition and chemical composition of urine from the same stone-forming patients, and large-scale randomized studies that evaluate the long-term effects of dietary modifications and pharmacological treatments for the prevention of recurrent stones.
Editorial Note on the Review Process
F1000 Faculty Reviews are commissioned from members of the prestigious F1000 Faculty and are edited as a service to readers. In order to make these reviews as comprehensive and accessible as possible, the referees provide input before publication and only the final, revised version is published. The referees who approved the final version are listed with their names and affiliations but without their reports on earlier versions (any comments will already have been addressed in the published version).
The referees who approved this article are:
Bernhard Hess, Department of Internal Medicine and Nephrology, Klinik Im Park, Zurich, Switzerland
Allen Rodgers, Department of Chemistry, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
Funding Statement
The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work.
[version 1; referees: 2 approved]
References
- 1. Trinchieri A: Epidemiology of urolithiasis: an update. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab. 2008;5(2):101–6. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Curhan GC: Epidemiology of stone disease. Urol Clin North Am. 2007;34(3):287–93. 10.1016/j.ucl.2007.04.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Trinchieri A: Epidemiological trends in urolithiasis: impact on our health care systems. Urol Res. 2006;34(2):151–6. 10.1007/s00240-005-0029-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Sakhaee K, Maalouf NM, Sinnott B: Clinical review. Kidney stones 2012: pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97(6):1847–60. 10.1210/jc.2011-3492 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Meschi T, Nouvenne A, Ticinesi A, et al. : Dietary habits in women with recurrent idiopathic calcium nephrolithiasis. J Transl Med. 2012;10:63. 10.1186/1479-5876-10-63 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Madore F, Stampfer MJ, Rimm EB, et al. : Nephrolithiasis and risk of hypertension. Am J Hypertens. 1998;11(1 Pt 1):46–53. 10.1016/S0895-7061(97)00371-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
- 7. Madore F, Stampfer MJ, Willett WC, et al. : Nephrolithiasis and risk of hypertension in women. Am J Kidney Dis. 1998;32(5):802–7. 10.1016/S0272-6386(98)70136-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
- 8. Cappuccio FP, Kalaitzidis R, Duneclift S, et al. : Unravelling the links between calcium excretion, salt intake, hypertension, kidney stones and bone metabolism. J Nephrol. 2000;13(3):169–77. 10.3410/f.726247611.793516118 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
- 9. Cauley JA, Fullman RL, Stone KL, et al. : Factors associated with the lumbar spine and proximal femur bone mineral density in older men. Osteoporos Int. 2005;16(12):1525–37. 10.1007/s00198-005-1866-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
- 10. Lauderdale DS, Thisted RA, Wen M, et al. : Bone mineral density and fracture among prevalent kidney stone cases in the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. J Bone Miner Res. 2001;16(10):1893–8. 10.1359/jbmr.2001.16.10.1893 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
- 11. Rule AD, Roger VL, Melton LJ, 3rd, et al. : Kidney stones associate with increased risk for myocardial infarction. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;21(10):1641–4. 10.1681/ASN.2010030253 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
- 12. Eisner BH, Cooperberg MR, Kahn AJ, et al. : Nephrolithiasis and the risk of heart disease in older women. J Urol. 2009;181(4):517–8. 10.1016/S0022-5347(09)61461-0 [DOI] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
- 13. Reiner AP, Kahn A, Eisner BH, et al. : Kidney stones and subclinical atherosclerosis in young adults: the CARDIA study. J Urol. 2011;185(3):920–5. 10.1016/j.juro.2010.10.086 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
- 14. Ferraro PM, Taylor EN, Eisner BH, et al. : History of kidney stones and the risk of coronary heart disease. JAMA. 2013;310(4):408–15. 10.1001/jama.2013.8780 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Fabris A, Ferraro PM, Comellato G, et al. : The relationship between calcium kidney stones, arterial stiffness and bone density: unraveling the stone-bone-vessel liaison. J Nephrol. 2015;28(5):549–55. 10.1007/s40620-014-0146-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Shavit L, Girfoglio D, Vijay V, et al. : Vascular calcification and bone mineral density in recurrent kidney stone formers. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015;10(2):278–85. 10.2215/CJN.06030614 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
- 17. Taylor EN, Stampfer MJ, Curhan GC: Obesity, weight gain, and the risk of kidney stones. JAMA. 2005;293(4):455–62. 10.1001/jama.293.4.455 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
- 18. West B, Luke A, Durazo-Arvizu RA, et al. : Metabolic syndrome and self-reported history of kidney stones: the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) 1988-1994. Am J Kidney Dis. 2008;51(5):741–7. 10.1053/j.ajkd.2007.12.030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
- 19. Maalouf NM, Cameron MA, Moe OW, et al. : Low urine pH: a novel feature of the metabolic syndrome. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007;2(5):883–8. 10.2215/CJN.00670207 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
- 20. Abate N, Chandalia M, Cabo-Chan AV, Jr, et al. : The metabolic syndrome and uric acid nephrolithiasis: novel features of renal manifestation of insulin resistance. Kidney Int. 2004;65(2):386–92. 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00386.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
- 21. Shavit L, Ferraro PM, Johri N, et al. : Effect of being overweight on urinary metabolic risk factors for kidney stone formation. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2015;30(4):607–13. 10.1093/ndt/gfu350 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Gambaro G, Ferraro PM, Capasso G: Calcium nephrolithiasis, metabolic syndrome and the cardiovascular risk. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012;27(8):3008–10. 10.1093/ndt/gfs139 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Ferraro PM, D'Addessi A, Gambaro G: Randall's plaques, plugs and the clinical workup of the renal stone patient. Urolithiasis. 2015;43(Suppl 1):59–61. 10.1007/s00240-014-0700-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Kok DJ, Khan SR: Calcium oxalate nephrolithiasis, a free or fixed particle disease. Kidney Int. 1994;46(3):847–54. 10.1038/ki.1994.341 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Randall A: The origin and growth of renal calculi. Ann Surg. 1937;105(6):1009–27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Evan AP, Lingeman JE, Coe FL, et al. : Randall's plaque of patients with nephrolithiasis begins in basement membranes of thin loops of Henle. J Clin Invest. 2003;111(5):607–16. 10.1172/JCI17038 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Stoller ML, Low RK, Shami GS, et al. : High resolution radiography of cadaveric kidneys: unraveling the mystery of Randall's plaque formation. J Urol. 1996;156(4):1263–6. 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)65565-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Gambaro G, Abaterusso C, Fabris A, et al. : The origin of nephrocalcinosis, Randall's plaque and renal stones: a cell biology viewpoint. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2009;81(3):166–70. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Mezzabotta F, Cristofaro R, Ceol M, et al. : Spontaneous calcification process in primary renal cells from a medullary sponge kidney patient harbouring a GDNF mutation. J Cell Mol Med. 2015;19(4):889–902. 10.1111/jcmm.12514 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Khan SR, Gambaro G: Role of Osteogenesis in the Formation of Randall's Plaques. Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2016;299(1):5–7. 10.1002/ar.23275 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Robertson WG, Peacock M, Heyburn PJ, et al. : Risk factors in calcium stone disease of the urinary tract. Br J Urol. 1978;50(7):449–54. 10.1111/j.1464-410X.1978.tb06189.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Tiselius HG: Metabolic evaluation of patients with stone disease. Urol Int. 1997;59(3):131–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Robertson WG, Scurr DS, Bridge CM: Factors influencing the crystallisation of calcium oxalate in urine - critique. J Cryst Growth. 1981;53(1):182–94. 10.1016/0022-0248(81)90064-6 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Hess B, Jost C, Zipperle L, et al. : High-calcium intake abolishes hyperoxaluria and reduces urinary crystallization during a 20-fold normal oxalate load in humans. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1998;13(9):2241–7. 10.1093/ndt/13.9.2241 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Edvardsson VO, Goldfarb DS, Lieske JC, et al. : Hereditary causes of kidney stones and chronic kidney disease. Pediatr Nephrol. 2013;28(10):1923–42. 10.1007/s00467-012-2329-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Fabris A, Lupo A, Ferraro PM, et al. : Familial clustering of medullary sponge kidney is autosomal dominant with reduced penetrance and variable expressivity. Kidney Int. 2013;83(2):272–7. 10.1038/ki.2012.378 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Torregrossa R, Anglani F, Fabris A, et al. : Identification of GDNF gene sequence variations in patients with medullary sponge kidney disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;5(7):1205–10. 10.2215/CJN.07551009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Ferraro PM, D'Addessi A, Gambaro G: When to suspect a genetic disorder in a patient with renal stones, and why. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2013;28(4):811–20. 10.1093/ndt/gfs545 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Vezzoli G, Terranegra A, Arcidiacono T, et al. : Genetics and calcium nephrolithiasis. Kidney Int. 2011;80(6):587–93. 10.1038/ki.2010.430 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
- 40. Vezzoli G, Terranegra A, Aloia A, et al. : Decreased transcriptional activity of calcium-sensing receptor gene promoter 1 is associated with calcium nephrolithiasis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98(9):3839–47. 10.1210/jc.2013-1834 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Thorleifsson G, Holm H, Edvardsson V, et al. : Sequence variants in the CLDN14 gene associate with kidney stones and bone mineral density. Nat Genet. 2009;41(8):926–30. 10.1038/ng.404 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
- 42. Curhan GC, Willett WC, Rimm EB, et al. : A prospective study of dietary calcium and other nutrients and the risk of symptomatic kidney stones. N Engl J Med. 1993;328(12):833–8. 10.1056/NEJM199303253281203 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Taylor EN, Stampfer MJ, Curhan GC: Dietary factors and the risk of incident kidney stones in men: new insights after 14 years of follow-up. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004;15(12):3225–32. 10.1097/01.ASN.0000146012.44570.20 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Trinchieri A, Maletta A, Lizzano R, et al. : Potential renal acid load and the risk of renal stone formation in a case-control study. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2013;67(10):1077–80. 10.1038/ejcn.2013.155 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Trinchieri A: Development of a rapid food screener to assess the potential renal acid load of diet in renal stone formers (LAKE score). Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2012;84(1):36–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Trinchieri A, Lizzano R, Marchesotti F, et al. : Effect of potential renal acid load of foods on urinary citrate excretion in calcium renal stone formers. Urol Res. 2006;34(1):1–7. 10.1007/s00240-005-0001-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Trinchieri A, Zanetti G, Currò A, et al. : Effect of potential renal acid load of foods on calcium metabolism of renal calcium stone formers. Eur Urol. 2001;39(Suppl 2):33–6; discussion 36-7. 10.1159/000052556 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Ferraro PM, Taylor EN, Gambaro G, et al. : Soda and other beverages and the risk of kidney stones. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013;8(8):1389–95. 10.2215/CJN.11661112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Ferraro PM, Taylor EN, Gambaro G, et al. : Caffeine intake and the risk of kidney stones. Am J Clin Nutr. 2014;100(6):1596–603. 10.3945/ajcn.114.089987 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Ferraro PM, Curhan GC, Sorensen MD, et al. : Physical activity, energy intake and the risk of incident kidney stones. J Urol. 2015;193(3):864–8. 10.1016/j.juro.2014.09.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Borghi L, Meschi T, Amato F, et al. : Urinary volume, water and recurrences in idiopathic calcium nephrolithiasis: a 5-year randomized prospective study. J Urol. 1996;155(3):839–43. 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)66321-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Shuster J, Jenkins A, Logan C, et al. : Soft drink consumption and urinary stone recurrence: a randomized prevention trial. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45(8):911–6. 10.1016/0895-4356(92)90074-W [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Fink HA, Wilt TJ, Eidman KE, et al. : Medical management to prevent recurrent nephrolithiasis in adults: a systematic review for an American College of Physicians Clinical Guideline. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(7):535–43. 10.7326/0003-4819-158-7-201304020-00005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
- 54. Hiatt RA, Ettinger B, Caan B, et al. : Randomized controlled trial of a low animal protein, high fiber diet in the prevention of recurrent calcium oxalate kidney stones. Am J Epidemiol. 1996;144(1):25–33. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a008851 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Borghi L, Schianchi T, Meschi T, et al. : Comparison of two diets for the prevention of recurrent stones in idiopathic hypercalciuria. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(2):77–84. 10.1056/NEJMoa010369 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; F1000 Recommendation
- 56. Trinchieri A, Esposito N, Castelnuovo C: Dissolution of radiolucent renal stones by oral alkalinization with potassium citrate/potassium bicarbonate. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2009;81(3):188–91. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Ellison DH, Loffing J: Thiazide effects and adverse effects: insights from molecular genetics. Hypertension. 2009;54(2):196–202. 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.109.129171 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Cameron JS, Simmonds HA: Use and abuse of allopurinol. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1987;294(6586):1504–5. 10.1136/bmj.294.6586.1504 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]