Skip to main content
Interface Focus logoLink to Interface Focus
. 2016 Jun 6;6(3):20150107. doi: 10.1098/rsfs.2015.0107

Minimally disruptive needle insertion: a biologically inspired solution

Alexander Leibinger 1, Matthew J Oldfield 1, Ferdinando Rodriguez y Baena 1,
PMCID: PMC4843620  PMID: 27274797

Abstract

The mobility of soft tissue can cause inaccurate needle insertions. Particularly in steering applications that employ thin and flexible needles, large deviations can occur between pre-operative images of the patient, from which a procedure is planned, and the intra-operative scene, where a procedure is executed. Although many approaches for reducing tissue motion focus on external constraining or manipulation, little attention has been paid to the way the needle is inserted and actuated within soft tissue. Using our biologically inspired steerable needle, we present a method of reducing the disruptiveness of insertions by mimicking the burrowing mechanism of ovipositing wasps. Internal displacements and strains in three dimensions within a soft tissue phantom are measured at the needle interface, using a scanning laser-based image correlation technique. Compared to a conventional insertion method with an equally sized needle, overall displacements and strains in the needle vicinity are reduced by 30% and 41%, respectively. The results show that, for a given net speed, needle insertion can be made significantly less disruptive with respect to its surroundings by employing our biologically inspired solution. This will have significant impact on both the safety and targeting accuracy of percutaneous interventions along both straight and curved trajectories.

Keywords: minimally invasive surgery, biologically inspired robotics, soft tissue, tissue disruption, tool–tissue interactions, image correlation

1. Introduction

The use of minimally invasive (MI) interventional tools for soft tissue surgery promises reduced tissue trauma, shorter procedure time and shorter recovery times for the patient. Common procedures involve needle insertions for diagnostic biopsy of cancerous tissue [1], brachytherapy [2] or drug delivery [3]. However, the difficulties and limited access associated with MI procedures warrant smarter modalities, which provide the surgeon with better control and assistance. In the near future, robot-assisted surgery has the potential to improve MI surgery.

In recent years, several robotically controlled steerable needle-based solutions have been proposed, which can accurately control tip deflection to follow planned curved paths within soft tissue [4]. Actively controlling the needle can increase placement accuracy, while simultaneously lowering risk, e.g. by avoiding obstacles or critical regions in tissue that lie between entry point and target. However, while most models can control the needle's trajectory, tissue motion and deformation during the insertion process remain difficult to quantify and predict, leading to significant targeting inaccuracies, as described by Deurloo et al. [5]. Internal regions of soft tissue around the needle experience the largest shape changes during an insertion, owing to the complex cutting process. These regions are therefore likely to show the largest discrepancy between pre-operative images and surgery. Percutaneous procedures that require multi-targeting (i.e. targeting multiple targets within an organ) or reinsertion are therefore under risk of inaccurate insertions if (i) the planned path is not accurately adjusted to account for the current tissue configuration or (ii) the dexterity of the flexible needle is not sufficient to reach the moving target.

Recent studies have presented systems that use a steerable needle with prior identification of parameters that minimize target motion [6], or that track motion and correct the insertion of a straight needle [7]. Other studies attempt to predict tissue motion using finite-element (FE) modelling to improve pre-operative planning [8]. Predicting large tissue motion, however, is difficult due to material nonlinearity and the heterogeneous structure of soft tissue. Real-time intra-operative imaging could help, but fast and accurate needle and tissue deformation tracking remains challenging. For example, imaging via ultrasound during percutaneous interventions in the brain suffers from low resolution and low signal-to-noise ratio, owing to interference from bony structures (e.g. the skull) and other surgical instruments [9].

Consequently, several researchers have chosen to focus on methods that aim to minimize tissue mobility and deformation during needle insertion. One approach is to constrain tissue externally by compression [10] or suction [11] at the needle access point for improved targeting accuracy. Another is to actively position a target on the needle path by externally manipulating the tissue with multiple robotic fingers [12]. While these systems have shown improvements, they may be difficult to apply to internal organs and are often not compatible with conventional clinical needles.

Our approach to tackle this outstanding open challenge in MI surgery makes use of a biologically inspired needle, currently under development at Imperial College London [13], which enables targeted interventions in soft tissue via curvilinear trajectories. The flexible needle consists of four axially interlocked parts that can slide relative to one another and are actuated independently. By defining appropriate axial offsets between needle segments, steering in two dimensions [14] and three dimensions [15] has been demonstrated. The needle's multi-part design was inspired by the ovipositor structure of Braconidae, as presented by Quicke et al. [16]. This structure also allows biologically inspired motion profiles to be investigated, where each segment is moved reciprocally rather than simultaneously [17]. Reciprocal motion has been shown to be advantageous due to the tensile support offered by segments being retracted to those being inserted—a phenomenon used, for example, in drills designed for interplanetary exploration [18]. Such motion also causes an anchoring effect due to the friction experienced at the needle–tissue interface, which leads to significant changes in the interaction between the needle and the surrounding tissue.

A laser-based image correlation technique [19] was developed to measure internal displacements close to the needle interface and at high resolution, where Lagrangian displacements and strains are computed to measure the material response due to the interactions between a needle and its surroundings [20]. Subsequently, FE simulations, supported by single-plane measurements obtained with the same set-up as in [20], were developed to demonstrate reduced target motion due to varied insertion parameters in a previous study [21].

In this study, we present an extended, fully three-dimensional experimental configuration, which enables measurements to be taken across the entire needle width. This results in both displacements and strains being resolved along and around the needle, which capture the material response during an insertion with unprecedented clarity. These measurements of a rigid four-part needle are used to investigate the effect of biologically inspired motion profiles on the material response in the needle vicinity, which are found to be substantially reduced in all cases.

In the following section, the needle's multi-part design and a definition of the biologically inspired motion profiles for the insertion are presented. The experimental design and the image acquisition around the needle for measuring three-dimensionally resolved displacements and strains close to the needle interface are then described. Subsequently, time- and depth-resolved results for insertions performed with both conventional and biologically inspired motion profiles are presented. The paper ends with a discussion of the results and conclusions.

2. Material and methods

The needle used for all insertions was made out of four axially interlocked segments (figure 1a), with an outer diameter (OD) of 4 mm, produced using rapid prototyping technology (Connex 350, Objet Inc., USA). The segments could slide along one another and were actuated independently by an actuation box able to generate four independent, 200 mm linear motions. All segments possessed a flat bevel tip, inclined by 20° from the needle centre axis, as illustrated in figure 1b, and were rapid prototyped out of the rigid material VeroGrey (Shore Hardness D 83-86, Objet Inc.).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Biologically inspired motion profiles of the four-part needle. (a) The prototype, with nitinol rods attached to side wings, which are used to drive the individual segments, (b) detailed view of PB actuation of the rigid prototype and (c) definition of the motion profile parameters. (Online version in colour.)

Tissue phantoms were prepared out of gelatin, with a concentration of 3.5% by weight, provided by Sleaford Quality Foods Ltd, UK. Gelatin powder was mixed with heated water for 10 min. At this concentration, gelatin was shown to be an acceptable phantom material, with similar stiffness and frictional properties to ex vivo porcine brain [22]. For the optical measurements, the gelatin was seeded with fluorescent melamine resin beads (10 µm in size, rhodamine B-marked, Sigma Aldrich Co.) before solidification, and then poured into transparent boxes with dimensions of 86 × 28.5 × 62 mm. Each box contained 110 ml of seeded gelatin. The particle number density was approximately 19 particles mm−3. In indentation testing, the added particles were shown to have no influence on the material response of the phantom material. Samples were stored in a domestic refrigerator at 14°C for 12 h and tested on the following day, after the gels had reached room temperature (20 ± 2°C).

2.1. Needle actuation via biologically inspired motion profiles

Insertions with the four-part needle were performed with two different motion profiles, at equivalent net speeds. In the first motion profile, all four segments were aligned and pushed simultaneously at the same speed (figure 1b, top). This type of insertion is referred to as direct push (DP).

For the biologically inspired motion profile, the four parts of the needle were actuated cyclically, at different speeds and directions, throughout the insertion process. Segments were pushed forward sequentially with a stroke length (l) of 4 mm. As one segment was pushed forward, the remaining three segments were pulled backwards (figure 1b, bottom). The amount of pullback (p) was empirically set to 30%, as it was shown to offer a good compromise between reduced tissue motion and higher individual segment speed [21]. Each cycle began with the leading segment moving forward, followed by the segment lying opposite, and so forth. A cycle was completed when each of the four segments was pushed forward, resulting in all segments being aligned again (figure 1c).

As all four segments were pulled back during one cycle, the distance travelled forward by the needle was not equal to l, but slightly less, with l(1 − p). In order to compare DP and pullback (PB) insertions, the net forward motion was set to be the same, i.e.

2.1.

where snet is the speed of the DP insertion and ts is the time one segment takes to move forward by l. This ensured that the needles reached the same depth in the same amount of time. snet was set to 0.5 mm s−1, a needle insertion speed in the range used in brain [23].

2.2. Experimental set-up for three-dimensional laser-based image correlation

The needle was inserted into transparent boxes containing the fresh, seeded tissue phantoms in the experimental set-up shown in figure 2. Ten PB insertions and eight DP insertions were performed. Full-field displacements were measured in five planes across the needle width. A 4.5 mW, 532 nm diode laser beam was deflected by a high precision, single-axis galvo mirror (GVS201, Thorlabs Ltd, UK), which scanned the measurement planes sequentially (figure 3). The laser beam was formed into a vertical, thin light sheet by three cylindrical lenses. The laser excited the fluorescent particles (with excitation around 540 nm and emission around 584 nm) in the tissue phantom and the emitted light was captured by charge-coupled device (CCD) cameras (mvBlueFOX 223C, MATRIX VISION GmbH, Germany), which were positioned on two opposite sides of the needle and perpendicular to the light sheets. In front of each camera was a coloured glass long pass filter (cut-off wavelength at 550 nm, OG550, Thorlabs Ltd, UK), which blocked the laser light and let the fluorescent particle light pass. This led to an increased signal-to-noise ratio for the particles with respect to the image background and hence more reliable correlation results, compared to particle images of scattered light. Additionally, unwanted reflections from the needle interface were blocked by the filter, leading to more accurate correlation results close to the needle interface.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Experimental scanning set-up showing the optical components and the needle actuation. (Online version in colour.)

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Schematic experimental set-up illustrating the scanned measurement locations across the needle width during an insertion. The galvo scanner deflects the light sheet to positions A, B and C for both cameras. (Online version in colour.)

The two CCD cameras were triggered synchronously with the galvo scanner. Scanning positions were ordered symmetrically around the centre axis of the needle:

  • — Position A: on the needle centre axis,

  • — Position B: 1 mm offset, and

  • — Position C: 2 mm offset, coinciding with the edge of the needle.

Each camera was exposed when the galvo scanner was held in locations A, B and C on its respective side. Position A, the centre plane, was recorded by both cameras simultaneously for validation purposes. Table 1 shows the trigger configuration of both cameras in the experimental design. The scanning speed was approximately 4.8 mm s−1 for a needle width of 4 mm, with an exposure time of 100 ms for each image acquisition.

Table 1.

Trigger configuration for the five scanning positions across the needle width.

position camera 1 exposure camera 2 exposure
C1 on off
B1 on off
A1,2 on on
B2 off on
C2 off on

The light sheet position was calibrated using the fixed needle in the experimental set-up. Using two apertures, the scanner was positioned in line with the needle axis so that the light sheet coincided with the needle centre. The rotational axis of the scanner was positioned at a distance of 500 mm from the centre of the camera's field of view. For the edge of the needle (2 mm), this resulted in a mirror angle of approximately 0.23°. Owing to the long distance between the rotating galvo scanner and the measurement location, measurement planes were assumed to be parallel at the location of the field of view.

For measurements during needle insertion, two field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) were used, configured via LabVIEW (CRIO 9014, National Instruments Inc.). A flowchart of the experimental set-up is shown in figure 4. The first FPGA controlled the motion profile of the needle, as defined in the previous section. The second FPGA module was employed to manage the timing and positioning of the two cameras and the galvo scanner. The camera exposures were triggered via a transistor–transistor logic (TTL) signal and the galvo position was controlled via an analogue output. This allowed the synchronized exposure of the cameras at each scanning position.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Flowchart of the triggered image acquisition in synchronization with the galvo scanner.

2.3. Image registration and displacement computation

To ensure consistent data analysis across the whole needle width, the field of view of both cameras was transformed into the same coordinate space by registering the recorded frames of the second camera to the first one. Frames of the measurement plane that lay on the needle centre axis (Position A) were recorded by both cameras simultaneously. Images recorded simultaneously in the centre measurement plane were paired and the rotation and scale factor of camera 2 with respect to camera 1 were found using Matlab (Mathworks Inc., USA). Matched features of the needle shape between both images were detected using the speeded-up robust features algorithm (SURF) [24]. Using corresponding point pairs, the transformation matrix (scale and rotation) was found using the M-estimator sample consensus algorithm (MSAC) [25]. By applying the transformation matrix to the frames recorded by the second camera, the fields of view of both cameras were aligned, resulting in consistent full field measurements in five measurement planes across the needle width.

For each scanning position, images of the fluorescent particles in the specific light plane inside the tissue phantom were recorded. Over the course of the insertion, particles enter and exit the measurement planes, hence making conventional particle tracking techniques unfeasible. Instead, frame-to-frame velocities in a spatially fixed grid were obtained via image correlation and interpolated to obtain Lagrangian displacements (as in Oldfield et al. [20]). Similar set-ups for scanning particle image velocimetry in flow applications, such as by Hori et al. [26], have been used to measure complex instantaneous vortex structures in a volume. In our work, a stereoscopic approach was not pursued, as the goal was to measure Lagrangian deformations over the entire insertion. While stereoscopic methods can provide instantaneous out-of-plane displacement components, particles cannot be tracked after leaving the plane. Thus, two-dimensional displacements were computed in the five measurement planes across the needle.

Subsequent frames in each measurement plane were cross-correlated to obtain instantaneous displacements. The needle shape was segmented from the particle images so that correlation results were not biased close to the interface. Recorded frames were 1360 px × 1024 px in size, which resulted in a field of view of approximately 25 × 20 mm. Frames were correlated in two passes, with square subsets of 128 px and 64 px, respectively, and 50% overlap, using a particle image velocimetry algorithm (PIVlab [27]). Rigid body experiments showed no significant effects on measurements due to image distortion. Magnification, due to the different refractive indices of the gelatin and the container's walls to air, was calibrated by using the needle diameter in the field of view as a reference. The resulting spatial resolution of the correlation grid was approximately 0.6 mm. Starting from the first recorded frame with the needle outside of the tissue phantom, virtual material points were defined by the initial correlation grid. Over subsequent frames, Lagrangian material locations x were spatially interpolated. Points in the undeformed state X at time t = 0 were mapped into the deformed state at time t:

2.3.

Displacement gradients were then calculated from bilinear FEs in which displacement fields u are interpolated over the element, using a digital image correlation toolbox [28]. From displacement gradients, Green–Lagrangian finite strain tensors were obtained, with the components:

2.3.

The two normal and the shear strain components, ɛ11, ɛ22 and ɛ12, respectively, were combined into a single quantity, in order to express the resulting state of strain around the needle. It is formed by the principal strains, ɛ1 and ɛ2:

2.3.

Here, the effective strain ɛeff was chosen, as this measure was used in other studies to quantify strain within tissue [29]:

2.3.

As strains are calculated from displacement gradients of the bilinear elements, results are sensitive to noise in heterogeneous regions with large gradients, as discussed by Lava et al. [30]. Tool–tissue interactions cause large deformations very close to the needle. Therefore, spatially smoothing displacements prior to building the gradients is required in order to obtain continuous strain fields. Here, a local regression filter, which fitted a data point and surroundings that fell within a radius of seven neighbouring points to a linear plane, was applied to the interpolated displacement fields. Control rigid body experiments showed this smoothing led to more consistent strain results.

3. Results

During needle insertions with DP and PB motion profiles, frames were recorded in five measurement planes across the needle width. Displacement and strain fields were computed for each plane, resulting in sliced volume measurements across the needle width while the needle travelled through the tissue phantom (figure 5).

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Image-correlation-based, depth-resolved measurements during needle insertion. (Online version in colour.)

For comparison, a point at the same insertion depth of approximately 31.4 mm was chosen for DP and PB experiments. At this point, all four parts of the needle were aligned during the PB motion profile and the needle had approximately travelled to the centre of the field of view. Displacements and strains in the vicinity of the needle were averaged and compared across the needle width. Displacements that fell within a neighbourhood of 1–3 mm distance from the needle interface were averaged. The evaluation points of the grid for the strain computation formed by bilinear FEs lay within the displacement grid, which led to losses of information at the grid edges. Therefore, strain evaluation points that fell within a neighbourhood of 1.5–3.5 mm from the needle interface were considered.

3.1. Depth-resolved displacement and strain measurements for different motion profiles

Computed displacements on the needle centre plane (Positions A1 and B1) measured with both cameras should match closely after image registration and correlation. By registering images during a needle insertion at the same point of time, the field of view of both cameras was aligned (figure 6a). This enabled the extraction of measurements from all measurement planes at the same location relative to the needle. Displacements at a position that was 4 mm behind the aligned needle tip were extracted for all experiments. At this location, the substrate has been fully parted by the needle, leaving the deformed material surrounding the needle shaft in focus. Figure 6b shows box plots of measured displacements on the needle centre axis for all experiments using DP and PB motion profiles, split into recordings A1 and A2 of the respective cameras. Means and standard deviations of displacements measured by both cameras match very closely for both experiments (table 2). An unpaired t-test was performed for both experiments and showed non-significant means of samples of both cameras in DP and PB experiments, confirming the accurate alignment of the fields of view and the accuracy of the image correlation. Hence, measurements by both cameras in the centre plane were treated as one sample group.

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

(a) A composite RGB image showing particle images with the needle of both cameras overlaid in different colour bands. Grey regions in the composite image show where the two images have the same intensities. Magenta and green regions show where the intensities are different. (b) Boxplots of centre plane measurements for DP and PB experiments. Displacements measured with both cameras in the same plane match. (Online version in colour.)

Table 2.

Measured mean displacements in needle surroundings on centre planes A1 and A2, respectively. The measurements of both cameras match for DP and PB experiments.

camera N mean (mm) s.d. (mm)
DP 1 8 1.27 0.11
2 8 1.24 0.11
PB 1 10 0.87 0.12
2 10 0.88 0.10

The depth-resolved distributions of displacements and strains for DP and PB motion profiles are shown in figure 7. Displacements and strains are lowest on the needle edges and tend to be higher towards the needle centre plane, with DP mean strains increasing from 4.9% on the edge to 7.2% in the centre. In general, displacement and strain magnitudes are significantly reduced in PB experiments in comparison to DP. Whereas the highest displacement and strain of DP lie on the centre plane (z = 0 mm), the peak for PB lies on the offset plane at z = −1 mm. For statistical analysis, centre plane measurements have been analysed via an unpaired t-test, showing statistically significant differences between DP and PB for both displacement magnitude and effective strain (p-values of 4 × 10−12 and 1 × 10−13, respectively). Displacements and strains of PB compared to DP were reduced by 30% and 41%, respectively (table 3).

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

Depth-resolved material response in needle surroundings after the needle tip has passed. (a) Displacements and (b) strains are significantly reduced for PB compared to DP. (Online version in colour.)

Table 3.

Analysis of measured displacements and strains on the centre plane around the needle, for the two different motion profiles.

motion profile N mean s.d.
displacements DP 16 1.25 mm 0.10 mm
PB 20 0.88 mm 0.11 mm
strains DP 16 7.14% 0.72%
PB 20 4.19% 0.76%

Figure 8 shows distributions of normal and shear strain components for representative DP and PB experiments, resolved along the needle insertion axis and across the needle width. For better visualization, a quadratic local regression plane (neighbourhood size of 2) was fitted to the measurement points across the needle width. The position of the needle tip is indicated by a transparent normal plane. Thus, regions behind the plane are in interaction with the needle shaft and regions in front of the plane are showing the material response shortly before needle cutting and crack formation.

Figure 8.

Figure 8.

Distributions for (a) axial, (b) radial and (c) shear strains resolved in the direction of needle insertion and needle width during an insertion for DP and PB motion profiles, respectively. The plane indicates the positions of the needle tip. (Online version in colour.)

Axial strains are compressive in front of the needle, as the tip is approaching, and decrease along the shaft, as material is dragged with the needle during the insertion (figure 8a). Radial strains change from tension ahead of the tip, as the crack begins to open, to compression around the shaft, as the needle occupies the volume inside the sample box (figure 8b). Shear strains are close to zero in front of the needle and increase around the needle shaft, when the crack is formed.

3.2. Evolution of internal deformations

Figure 9 shows the evolution of displacements and strains on the centre plane, averaged across all experiments, at the depth of 31.4 mm within the tissue phantom, as the needle is travelling through it. At the beginning of the insertion, at ca 8 mm insertion depth, a local peak is observable, caused by initial puncture of the needle in the sample. Over time, displacements and strains are showing a cyclical increase and decrease for the PB motion profile, as the needle segments are pushed forward and pulled back regularly during the insertion. Consistently, over the course of the insertion, displacements and strains for PB are below those for DP. After the needle tip has passed and the full crack has been developed, displacements and strains for DP increase continuously, but at a slower rate. PB displacements remain stable and strains decrease slightly.

Figure 9.

Figure 9.

Time-resolved material response, means and standard deviations, in needle surroundings on the centre plane, as the needle is inserted into the gelatin phantom. The vertical line indicates when the needle tip reaches the monitored location. (a) Displacements and (b) strains are reduced for PB and show the cyclical nature of the needle actuation. (Online version in colour.)

4. Discussion

Deformations resulting from interactions of a needle inserted within a substrate were analysed for experiments performed with conventional DP and biologically inspired PB motion profiles, for a 4 mm, four-part needle. Optical measurements via laser-based image correlation allowed us to obtain a comprehensive set of full-field displacements and strains inside a soft tissue phantom, resolved across five measurement planes on the needle interface over the course of the entire insertion. By extending the image correlation measurements to multiple planes across the whole needle width, the full material response due to friction, cutting and crack forming was captured. This allows us to compare the material response due to different insertion parameters. Here, we inserted the needle with two different motion profiles.

The image registration and cross correlation of subsequent frames was shown to be reliable by comparing simultaneous measurements of both cameras on the measurement plane located on the central needle insertion axis. Results of both cameras in the vicinity of the needle showed very good agreement (table 2).

After the needle tip has passed, material is deformed the most where the needle has cut the material. Displacements and strains were the lowest at the needle edges and higher towards the needle centre plane (figure 7). While for DP the segments are fully aligned and the crack is formed by its symmetric tip, in PB the material is cut by the bevel tip of the leading segment (§2.1). This results in a different distribution of displacements and strains, with the highest values measured on the measurement plane lying on the bevel tip of the leading segment (position B1).

The PB motion profile causes changing contact interactions between the needle and the surrounding substrate. Overall, displacements and strains during insertion were significantly reduced compared with DP across the needle width (table 3). Strains (normal, radial and shear) in the needle surroundings are also reduced for PB at the same insertion depth (figure 8). This shows that the continuous increase of deformation, owing to an increasing frictional contact between needle and substrate, is less during a PB insertion than during DP. As a result, axial strains are less compressive and shear strains in the substrate are reduced. This reduction of deformations inside the tissue phantom was achieved solely by changing the way the needle was actuated, at the same net insertion speed (as to reach a targeted location in the same amount of time). Whilst the needle burrows itself deeper into the substrate, the relatively small pullback motion leads to sticking contact in the opposite direction, impeding material from being displaced. Conversely, material is continuously dragged with the full needle during the DP insertion. With the material being anchored and remaining closer to its undeformed configuration with PB, effective strains are reduced.

The cyclic nature of the interaction between the needle with the PB motion and the substrate manifests itself in the evolution of internal deformations at a given insertion depth. Although displacements and strains in DP increase continuously, PB shows increases and decreases with every cycle. After the needle tip has passed a point in the substrate, the substrate has been parted and increasing frictional drag in DP leads to an increase in axial strain around the needle interface. In PB, displacements and strains remain fairly stable, as overall material motion is reduced by the back and forth motion of the segments. Strains even decrease slightly, indicating that material is releasing strain energy, while it is kept at the same position over time.

Causing reduced tissue motion and deformation during an insertion can increase the accuracy and hence the success for a medical procedure. If the tissue configuration has changed less due to the needle being inserted, surgeons can rely with higher confidence on internal scans acquired pre-operatively. By combining this needle insertion method with tissue constraining techniques, e.g. via suction or compression, tissue mobility can potentially be reduced even further. Additionally, reduced strains mean that less force is acting by the tissue on the needle. This can potentially reduce the risk of buckling for thin and flexible needles that can be actively steered within soft tissue during insertion.

The OD of the needle prototype in this study is larger than that of typical MI surgical instruments, such as those used for biopsy or brachytherapy. However, we have been using scaled up prototypes in testing for several years, as they are easier and cheaper to manufacture and handle within a laboratory set-up. In order to produce results for easy interpretation in the context of previous and parallel work on needle steering [31] and control [15], we chose to keep the OD as 4 mm, which is the same size as was used in these experiments. Over the years, we have continued to reduce the OD of successive prototypes by means of design optimization (e.g. [32]) and more advanced manufacturing techniques, which are yielding very encouraging results. For a clinically sized needle, the findings described here are expected to hold, as the amount of reduction achieved with a reciprocal insertion strategy depends on material-dependent contact parameters at the needle–tissue interface, which remain significant even at smaller scales. For instance, friction presents a challenge even for very small needles, as shown for a 0.59 mm used in fixed bevel tip steering [33]. This indicates that the reduction in deformations and strains achieved thanks to our motion concept would still be valuable for clinically sized needles.

Needle–tissue interaction forces will inevitably be substrate-dependent, as they will be affected by the elastic, fracture, porous and frictional characteristics of the tissue being traversed. Casanova et al. [34] demonstrated that hydrogels and brain tissue behave very differently during needle insertions and that the net insertion speed would be a critical, over-arching parameter to consider. Similarly, Leibinger et al. [22] demonstrated how challenging matching all of the mechanical characteristics of brain is with a single tissue phantom material. However, there is ample scope to tune the biomimetic motion profiles to improve substrate deformation depending on its particular and evolving material characteristics (e.g. moving from grey matter to white matter in the brain) and we have preliminary, unpublished tests that indicate the needle presented here is also able to penetrate stiffer and tougher materials, such as liver.

By carefully optimizing parameters, such as stroke length or pullback, the PB motion profile can be tuned to further reduce disruptiveness. Replicating the experiments with FE models may present an efficient way of optimizing motion profile parameters. Three-dimensional findings presented here can be used to further develop FE models (as presented in [21]) that realistically capture the interactions associated with fracture, as well as friction. The anchoring effect could also be enhanced by increasing directional frictional resistance of the outer needle surface, e.g. with surface textures [35]. However, this may lead to increased tissue trauma when the needle is retracted.

The biologically inspired motion profiles, with lower displacements and strains in the surrounding material, could lead to a more tissue sparing approach to percutaneous intervention, as internal strains can be linked to functional damage [36]. The gelatin soft tissue phantom, however, shows less viscoelastic behaviour than real soft tissue [22]. As the material around the needle is undergoing repeated cycles of being dragged and pulled back, it is more likely for temporal relaxation to occur, which would lead to a reduction in stress. Investigations using a more viscous material could reveal more insights about time-dependent changes in interactions, such as decreasing strains and stresses inside the substrate (figure 9).

Although the material response of a tissue phantom can only give an indication, histology studies could be used for an assessment of the tissue damage caused by both insertion profiles. New methods to make tissue transparent, such as CLARITY [37], are able to reveal intact brain structure and could be used for detailed damage studies.

5. Conclusion

In this work, we present the most complete, high fidelity tool–tissue interaction study of a biologically inspired needle insertion profile, ‘pull back’, which is compared to conventional ‘DP’ for a 4 mm, four-segment plastic needle. By means of optical measurements inside a soft tissue phantom, we reveal how the material at the needle interface is dragged less during the insertion process, leading to cyclically decreasing displacements and strains inside the substrate for our biologically inspired approach. At the same insertion depth, displacement magnitudes (−30%) and effective strains (−41%) in the needle surroundings were significantly less than after a DP-based insertion, where the full needle is inserted at a matched, constant insertion speed.

By exploiting the benefits of our biologically inspired motion profile, needles can be inserted more accurately into soft tissue and flexible needles can be steered with smaller risk of buckling, enabling safer insertions, with the potential for reduced tissue damage. Tests in ex vivo tissue and advanced numerical models will be required in order to optimize insertion parameters of the needle motion profile for better accuracy and safety.

Additionally, our immediate goal will be to marry this unique insertion strategy with ongoing work on surgical needle steering, for which we are close to a clinically viable prototype for application to neurosurgical drug delivery (www.eden2020.eu).

Supplementary Material

Raw data from experiments
rsfs20150107supp1.xlsx (92.5KB, xlsx)

Data accessibility

See the electronic supplementary material for Excel file with DP and PB displacements and strains, and recording during performed needle insertion with scanning laser-based set-up.

Authors' contributions

A.L. designed the optical set-up, carried out the experiments, post-processed the data and drafted the manuscript. M.O. defined the pullback motion concept and helped draft the manuscript. F.R. conceived the study, coordinated the work and helped draft the manuscript. All authors gave final approval for publication.

Competing interests

We declare we have no competing interests.

Funding

This work received funding from the European Research Council under the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013), ERC grant agreement no. 258642-STING.

References

  • 1.Schueller G, Schueller-Weidekamm C, Helbich TH. 2008. Accuracy of ultrasound-guided, large-core needle breast biopsy. Eur. Radiol. 18, 1761–1773. ( 10.1007/s00330-008-0955-4) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Stock RG, Stone NN. 2010. Current topics in the treatment of prostate cancer with low-dose-rate brachytherapy. Urol. Clin. North Am. 37, 83–96. ( 10.1016/j.ucl.2009.11.013) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Casanova F, Carney PR, Sarntinoranont M. 2014. Effect of needle insertion speed on tissue injury, stress, and backflow distribution for convection-enhanced delivery in the rat brain. PLoS ONE 9, e94919 ( 10.1371/journal.pone.0094919) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Webster RJ III, Cowan NJ, Chirikjian GS, Okamura AM. 2006. Nonholonomic modelling of needle steering. Int. J. Rob. Res. 25, 509–526. ( 10.1177/0278364906065388) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Deurloo EE, Gilhuijs KG, Schultze Kool LJ, Muller SH. 2001. Displacement of breast tissue and needle deviations during stereotactic procedures. Invest. Radiol. 36, 347–353. ( 10.1097/00004424-200106000-00008) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Abayazid M, Moreira P, Shahriari N, Patil S, Alterovitz R, Misra S. 2015. Ultrasound-guided three-dimensional needle steering in biological tissue with curved surfaces. Med. Eng. Phys. 37, 145–150. ( 10.1016/j.medengphy.2014.10.005) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hungr N, Baumann M, Long J-A, Troccaz J. 2012. A 3-D ultrasound robotic prostate brachytherapy system with prostate motion tracking. IEEE Trans. Robot. 28, 1382–1397. ( 10.1109/TRO.2012.2203051) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Assaad W, Misra S. 2013. Combining ultrasound-based elasticity estimation and FE models to predict 3D target displacement. Med. Eng. Phys. 35, 549–554. ( 10.1016/j.medengphy.2012.11.003) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.O'Reilly MA, Hynynen K. 2013. A super-resolution ultrasound method for brain vascular mapping. Med. Phys. 40, 110701 ( 10.1118/1.4823762) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hatano M, Kobayashi Y, Suzuki M, Shiraishi Y, Yambe T, Hashizume M, Fujie MG. 2012. Geometry effect of preloading probe on accurate needle insertion for breast tumor treatment. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, Saint Paul, MN, USA, 14–18 May 2012, pp. 1933–1938. ( 10.1109/ICRA.2012.6224604) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wedlick TR, Lin DJ, Okamura AM. 2013. Tissue fixation by suction increases the accuracy of robotic needle insertion. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, Karlsruhe, Germany, 6–10 May 2013, pp. 1694–1699. ( 10.1109/ICRA.2013.6630798) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Mallapragada V, Sarkar N, Podder TK. 2011. Toward a robot-assisted breast intervention system. IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatronics 16, 1011–1020. ( 10.1109/TMECH.2010.2068575) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Frasson L, Ko SY, Turner A, Parittotokkaporn T, Vincent JF, Rodriguez y Baena F. 2010. STING: a soft-tissue intervention and neurosurgical guide to access deep brain lesions through curved trajectories. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part H J. Eng. Med. 224, 775–788. ( 10.1243/09544119JEIM663) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ko SY, Rodriguez Y, Baena F. 2013. Toward a miniaturized needle steering system with path planning for obstacle avoidance. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 60, 910–917. ( 10.1109/TBME.2012.2227741) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Secoli R, Rodriguez y Baena F.2013. Closed-loop 3D motion modeling and control of a steerable needle for soft tissue surgery. In 2013 IEEE Int. conf. on Robotics and Automation, Karlsruhe, Germany, 6–10 May 2013, pp. 5831–5836. ( ) [DOI]
  • 16.Quicke DLJ, Fitton MG. 1995. Ovipositor steering mechanisms in parasitic wasps of the families Gasteruptiidae and Aulacidae (Hymenoptera). Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 261, 99–103. ( 10.1098/rspb.1995.0122) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Vincent JFV, King MJ. 1995. The mechanism of drilling by wood wasp ovipositors. Biomimetics 3, 187–201. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Pitcher C, Gao Y. 2015. Analysis of drill head designs for dual-reciprocating drilling technique in planetary regoliths. Adv. Space Res. 56, 1765–1776. ( 10.1016/j.asr.2015.07.008) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kerl J, Parittotokkaporn T, Frasson L, Oldfield M, Rodriguez y Baena F, Beyrau F. 2012. Tissue deformation analysis using a laser based digital image correlation technique. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 6, 159–165. ( 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2011.10.007) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Oldfield MJ, Burrows C, Kerl J, Frasson L, Parittotokkaporn T, Beyrau F, Rodriguez y Baena F. 2013. Highly resolved strain imaging during needle insertion: results with a novel biologically inspired device. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 30, 50–60. ( 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.10.016) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Oldfield MJ, Leibinger A, Seah TET, Rodriguez y Baena F. 2015. Method to reduce target motion through needle–tissue interactions. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 43, 2794–2803. ( 10.1007/s10439-015-1329-0) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Leibinger A, Forte AE, Tan Z, Oldfield MJ, Beyrau F, Dini D, Rodriguez y Baena F. In press. Soft tissue phantoms for realistic needle insertion: a comparative study. Ann. Biomed. Eng. ( 10.1007/s10439-015-1523-0) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Binder DK, Rau GM, Starr PA. 2005. Risk factors for hemorrhage during microelectrode-guided deep brain stimulator implantation for movement disorders. Neurosurgery 56, 722–728. ( 10.1227/01.NEU.0000156473.57196.7E) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Bay H, Tuytelaars T, Van Gool L. 2006. SURF: speeded up robust features. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 3951, 404–417. ( 10.1007/11744023_32) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Torr PHS, Zisserman A. 2000. MLESAC: a new robust estimator with application to estimating image geometry. Comput. Vis. Image Underst. 78, 138–156. ( 10.1006/cviu.1999.0832) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hori T, Sakakibara J. 2004. High-speed scanning stereoscopic PIV for 3D vorticity measurement in liquids. Meas. Sci. Technol. 15, 1067–1078. ( 10.1088/0957-0233/15/6/005) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Thielicke W, Stamhuis EJ. 2014. PIVlab—towards user-friendly, affordable and accurate digital particle image velocimetry in MATLAB. J. Open Res. Softw. 2, e30 ( 10.5334/jors.bl) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Jones EMC, Silberstein MN, White SR, Sottos NR. 2014. In situ measurements of strains in composite battery electrodes during electrochemical cycling. Exp. Mech. 54, 971–985. ( 10.1007/s11340-014-9873-3) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Bjornsson CS, et al. 2006. Effects of insertion conditions on tissue strain and vascular damage during neuroprosthetic device insertion. J. Neural Eng. 3, 196–207. ( 10.1088/1741-2560/3/3/002) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Lava P, Cooreman S, Debruyne D. 2010. Study of systematic errors in strain fields obtained via DIC using heterogeneous deformation generated by plastic FEA. Opt. Lasers Eng. 48, 457–468. ( 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2009.08.013) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Leibinger A, Burrows C, Oldfield MJ, Rodriguez y Baena F. 2015. Tissue motion due to needle deflection. In 2015 37th Annual Int. Conf. of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), Milan, Italy, 25–29 August 2015, pp. 1873–1876 ( 10.1109/EMBC.2015.7318747) [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 32.Leibinger A, Oldfield M, Rodriguez y Baena F. 2014. Multi-objective design optimization for a steerable needle for soft tissue surgery. IFMBE Proc. 43, 420–423. ( 10.1007/978-3-319-02913-9_107) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Reed KB, Okamura AM, Cowan NJ. 2009. Modeling and control of needles with torsional friction. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 56, 2905–2916. ( 10.1109/TBME.2009.2029240) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Casanova F, Carney PR, Sarntinoranont M. 2014. In vivo evaluation of needle force and friction stress during insertion at varying insertion speed into the brain. J. Neurosci. Methods 237, 79–89. ( 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2014.08.012) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Frasson L, Parittotokkaporn T, Schneider A, Davies BL, Vincent JFV, Huq SE, Degenaar P, Baena FMR.2008. Biologically inspired microtexturing: investigation into the surface topography of next-generation neurosurgical probes. In 2008 30th Annual Int. Conf. of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society , Vancouver, Canada, 20–25 August 2008 , pp. 5611–5614. ( ) [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 36.Wright RM, Ramesh KT. 2012. An axonal strain injury criterion for traumatic brain injury. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 11, 245–260. ( 10.1007/s10237-011-0307-1) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Chung K, et al. 2013. Structural and molecular interrogation of intact biological systems. Nature 497, 332–337. ( 10.1038/nature12107) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Raw data from experiments
rsfs20150107supp1.xlsx (92.5KB, xlsx)

Data Availability Statement

See the electronic supplementary material for Excel file with DP and PB displacements and strains, and recording during performed needle insertion with scanning laser-based set-up.


Articles from Interface Focus are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES