Skip to main content
PMC home page
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2016 Feb 26;69:179–189. doi: 10.1007/s10493-016-0027-4

Molecular evidence for bacterial pathogens in Ixodes ricinus ticks infesting Shetland ponies

Bogumiła Skotarczak 1,✉, Beata Wodecka 1, Anna Rymaszewska 1, Małgorzata Adamska 1
PMCID: PMC4844639  PMID: 26920921

Abstract

Ixodes ricinus has the potential to transmit zoonotic pathogens to humans and domestic animals. The feeding I. ricinus (n = 1737) collected from 49 Shetland ponies and questing ones from vegetation (n = 371) were tested for the presence and differentiation of the bacterial species. DNA of I. ricinus ticks was examined with PCR and sequencing analysis to identify species of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato (Bbsl), Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Rickettsia spp. Altogether, 24.3 % I. ricinus of the infested horses and 12.4 % ticks from vegetation carried at least one pathogen species. Horse-feeding ticks (19.2 %) were significantly more frequently infected with Borrelia spp. than questing ticks (4.8 %). Among Bbsl species, in I. ricinus infesting ponies, B. garinii, B. afzelii, B. burgdorferi sensu stricto, B. valaisiana and B. lusitanie and one species, B. miyamotoi related to relapsing fever group, were detected. The 73 flaB gene sequences of Borrelia obtained from feeding I. ricinus have been deposited in GenBank. Among Rickettsia species, two were identified: R. helvetica which was dominant and R. monacensis. Infections with more than one pathogenic species, involving mostly Bbsl and R. helvetica were detected in 6.3 % of infected ticks collected from horses. Shetland ponies may play an important role in the epidemiological cycle of Bbsl and probably could contribute to the natural cycle of A. phagocytophilum and R. helvetica as host for infected ticks. The awareness about these infectious agents in ticks from ponies might be an important criterion for the risk assessment of human diseases, especially as these animals are maintained for recreational purposes.

Keywords: Borrelia, Anaplasma, Rickettsia, Questing and feeding Ixodes ricinus, PCR, Sequencing

Introduction

In Europe, as well as in Poland, Ixodes ricinus is the most common hard tick species and is one of the most important vectors of pathogens for humans and animals (Skotarczak et al. 2003; Wodecka 2003). Among these agents, pathogenic for humans and breeding animals, there are numerous bacteria such as Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato (Bbsl), Anaplasma phagocytophilum or Rickettsia spp. The last two are emerging tick-borne pathogens and cause increasing number of infections in the endemic zones in Europe (Franke et al. 2010).

In Bbsl complex of 19 species (Mannelli et al. 2012), some of them are the agents of Lyme borreliosis, the most prevalent tick-borne disease in Europe. Ten species among them and additionally Borrelia miyamotoi, related to the relapsing fever spirochetes, have been detected in the European tick vector, I. ricinus (Wodecka et al. 2010; Casjens et al. 2011; Lommano et al. 2012).

Bbsl infects a wide variety of wild vertebrates, some of which play a role as an infection reservoir but domestic animals like horses are often described as accidental hosts for these pathogens due to the lack of high and persistent bacteremia (Butler et al. 2005; Hansen et al. 2010). In Europe, in humans and dogs, different B. burgdorferi species are predisposed to cause different clinical manifestations affecting different organ systems and similar variation in clinical signs of Bbsl in infected horses might be due to their infection with different species (Butler et al. 2005; Gall and Pfister 2006). Asymptomatic infections appear to be common in horses as well as in other animal species but description of clinical signs in horses associated with Bbsl infections are based on a lower number of case reports (Gall and Pfister 2006). Whether horses may develop clinical disease due to this pathogen, it is controversially discussed, like a role of horses as a competent reservoir.

Anaplasma phagocytophilum is the causative agent of granulocytic anaplasmosis occurring in humans and several species of wild and domestic mammals (Rymaszewska and Adamska 2011), including horses (Adaszek and Winiarczyk 2011), and of tick-borne fever in ruminants (Nieder et al. 2012). The first reports in the literature about livestock suffering from a disease called “tick-borne fever” (TBF), have been reported in Europe in 1932 (Gordon et al. 1932), although the history of this fever seems to be even older. A devastating illness of small ruminants was known in western Norway in 1780 (Stuen et al. 2013). Wild ruminants such as roe deer show high infection rates with A. phagocytophilum and have been suggested as reservoir hosts (Polin et al. 2004; Skotarczak et al. 2008; Stefanciková et al. 2008). Equine granulocytic ehrlichiosis (A. phagocytophilum was formerly known as Ehrlichia equi) has been recognized as an infection which causes a wide range of clinical symptoms including lethargy, depression, fever, limb edema and thrombocytopenia (Jahn et al. 2010) but the horses are not known to develop chronic clinical signs (Bakken and Dumler 2000).

The bacteria of the Rickettsia genus, obligate intracellular parasites are divided into two subgroups, i.e. the spotted fever group (SFG), composed of almost 20 European species, and the typhus group (TG) with two species only (Rymaszewska and Piotrowski 2013). Rickettsiae are transmitted to vertebrates via hematophagous parasite such as ticks, mites or fleas and they are not only vectors, but also reservoirs for a majority of Rickettsia species (Raoult and Roux 1997). Rickettsiae described in Europe belong to the SFG subgroup, the vectors of which are chiefly ticks of the Ixodes genus with the leading role of I. ricinus. The presence of rickettsiae in that species has been reported in many European countries (Oteo and Portillo 2012).

This study is a part of an application that aimed at better understanding the maintenance of the tick-borne bacteria pathogens in north-western Poland, their endemic region. Earlier, we studied molecular evidence of tick-borne agents in I. ricinus collected from vegetation (Skotarczak et al. 2003) and from game animals (Skotarczak et al. 2008). So far, among domestic animals we have examined dogs (Skotarczak et al. 2005; Rymaszewska and Adamska 2011).

In the present paper, to illustrate the diversity of tick-borne pathogens circulating in the domestic host-tick system in the same region of Poland, questing (from vegetation) and feeding on ponies I. ricinus ticks were analyzed with molecular methods to determine the presence of the pathogen species with attention to the co-infection of B. burgdorferi s.l., A. phagocytophilum and Rickettsia spp.

Materials and methods

Study site and tick collection from ponies and vegetation

Ticks were collected from 49 individuals of Shetland ponies which is a breed of the domestic horse (Equus caballus), kept mainly for recreational purposes. The ponies graze on 60 hectare grassland area of Imno Shetlands pony stud at Imno, which is situated on the edge of Goleniowska Forest (north-western Poland, 53°33′20″N 14°56′00″E).

Fed and semi fed ticks were collected in March–June and August–November 2010–2012 from the skin of the ponies permanently kept at the stud. Ticks, all belonging to the Ixodes ricinus species, collected from horses (n = 1737) were identified in terms of stage and sex of the imago (females n = 1292, males n = 263, nymphs n = 182, Table 1). In addition, questing I. ricinus were collected by flagging vegetation in the area surrounding Imno stud. Among 371 individuals of host-seeking I. ricinus collected from the vegetation, there were 6 females, 10 males, 252 nymphs and 103 larvae (Table 3). All ticks were maintained at −20 °C until the DNA extraction.

Table 1.

Occurrence of DNAs of Borrelia spp., Anaplasma phagocytiphilum and Rickettsia spp. in Ixodes ricinus collected from ponies

I. ricinus I. ricinus Borrelia A. phagocytophilum Rickettsia
Stages/sex N/PCR+/% PCR+/% PCR+/% PCR+/%
Females 1292/353/27.3 259/20.0 22/1.7 75/5.8
Males 263/46/17.4 39/14.8 2/0.8 5/1.9
Nymphs 182/48/26.3 35/19.2 2/1.4 11/6.0
Total 1737/450a/24.3 333/19.2 26/1.5 91/5.2
Open in a new tab

a450 PCR + I. ricinus: 423 individual occurrences and 27 dual co-incidences

Table 3.

Occurrence and co-incidence of DNAs of Borrelia s.l. Bbsl (BG B. garinii, BA B. afzelii, BB B. burgdorferi sensu stricto, BL B. lusitaniae), Anaplasma phagocytophilum (Aph) and Rickettsia helvetica (Rh) in Ixodes ricinus collected from vegetation

Stages/sex No I. ricinus/PCR+ (%) BbSL BG
PCR+/%		 BA
PCR+/%		 BB
PCR+/%		 BL
PCR+/%		 Aph
PCR+/%		 Rh
PCR+/%
Females 6/1 (16.7) 0 0 0 0 0 0 1/16.7
Males 10/2 (20.0) 0 0 0 0 0 2/20 0
Nymphs 252/42 (16.7) 17/6.7 9/3.6 5/2.0 1/0.4 2/0.8 3/1.2 22/8.7
Larvae 103/1 (1.0) 1/1.0 1/1.0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 371/46 (12.4) 18/4.8 10/2.6 5/1.3 1/0.3 2/0.5 5/1.3 23/6.2
Open in a new tab

DNA extraction

DNA extraction from ticks was performed with a phenol–chloroform protocol (Wodecka et al. 2014). DNA samples were stored at −70 °C before PCR analyses.

PCR amplification, species identification and sequencing

All collected I. ricinus ticks were examined for the presence of B. burgdorferi sensu lato, A. phagocytophilum and Rickettsia spp. DNA. For this purpose, a screening reaction was conducted using primers amplifying fragments of the flaB gene for Borrelia, msp2 gene for A. phagocytophilum, and gltA gene for Rickettsia spp.

A nested PCR with two primer sets complementary to entire Borrelia genus, i.e. outer 132f/905r and inner 220f/823r, was used to detect flaB gene fragment of Borrelia according to Wodecka et al. (2010). In each PCR run DNA isolated from reference strains of B. burgdorferi s.s. IRS, B. garinii 20047, B. afzelii VS461, B. valaisiana VS116, B. bissettii DN127 and B. spielmanii PC-Eq17 (German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures—DSMZ, Germany) were used as positive controls and TE buffer as negative control. The PCR products were separated on 1.5 % agarose gel (Bioshop) and archived. The DNA fragments amplified with primers 220f and 823r were digested with enzymes HpyF3I and Ecl136II (Fermentas) to obtain RFLP patterns of different Borrelia species according to the protocol by Wodecka (2011).

PCR for Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Rickettsia sp. employed GoTaq®Flexi DNA Polymerase (Promega, USA) at 0.5U/20 μl mix. Final reagent concentrations were 10 mM Tris–HCl (pH 8.3), 50 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 200 μM for each deoxynucleoside triphosphate, 10 pM for each primer and 2 μl DNA. PCR conditions were adapted for GoTaq®Flexi DNA Polymerase, according to producer’s indications, and the annealing temperatures for respective primer sets were used: msp2 gene (A. phagocytophilum) by Levin et al. (2002), gltA gene (Rickettsia sp.) by Nilsson et al. (1997). Amplification of the genetic material was carried out in the presence of positive and negative control (without DNA). As positive controls there was used DNA from isolates where previously the presence of the genetic material of bacteria A. phagocytophilum or R. helvetica had been confirmed. All positive specimens for Anaplasma and Rickettsia have been sequenced, and the nucleotide sequences were compared to previously obtained and submitted to the GenBank. Analysis of the nucleotide sequences allowed confirming the species belonging of the bacteria detected on the basis of DNA obtained from the ticks’ isolates.

Tick-borne pathogen DNA sequencing

Partial sequencing of the flaB gene fragments of Borrelia obtained with primers 220f and 823r was performed for positive samples. These yielded restriction patterns characteristic for different Borrelia species. DNA sequencing was performed with dye termination-cycle sequencing. Each strand was analyzed by using an ABI fluorescence automated sequencer.

73 flaB gene sequences of Borrelia were deposited in the GenBank. The sequences are listed as follows: KR782178–KR782215 (B. afzelii), KR782216–KR782218 (B. burgdorferi s.s.), KR782219–KR782236 (B. garinii), KR782237–KR782249 (B. lusitanie), KR782250 (B. miyamotoi).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed with a X2 test to investigate the differences in infections prevalence between feeding and questing I. ricinus and between the stages of ticks. Statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05.

Results

In total, 423 (24.3 %) I. ricinus collected from ponies were infected with at least one bacterium (Table 1). Borrelia spp. were the most frequently isolated pathogens in ticks, with a total prevalence of 19.2 % (333/1737). Table 1 shows the percentage of infected with Borrelia spp. feeding I. ricinus ticks, adults and nymphs collected from ponies. Percentages of infected females (20 %; 259/1292) and nymphs (19.2; 35/182) were higher than percentages of males (14.8; 39/263, P < 0.005). Among Bbsl species in horse-infested I. ricinus, 5 were identified and the dominant species was B. afzelii (55.2 %; 184/333), then B. garinii (29.7 %; 99/333), B. burgdorferi sensu stricto (5.4 %; 18/333), B. valaisiana (4.5 %; 15/333) and B. lusitanie (3.6 %; 12/333, Table 2. Additionally, B. miyamotoi, species related to relapsing fever group was identified in 2 ticks (0.6 %; 2/333, Table 2). All recognized species were in females, but 3 in males and nymphs, however both B. garinii and B. afzelii were in all stages.

Table 2.

Species of Borrelia and Rickettsia and co-incidence with Borrelia spp., Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Rickettsia helvetica in Ixodes ricinus collected from ponies

Ixodes ricinus
Stages/sex		 Borrelia
n = 333a 		Rickettsia
n = 91		 Co-incidence
n = 27
BG
n/%		 BA
n/%		 BB
n/%		 BV
n/%		 BL
n/%		 BM
n/%		 Rh
n/%		 Rm
n/%		 BA/BG
n/%		 BA/BL
n/%		 BG/Aph
n/%		 BA/Aph BB/Aph BG/Rh BA/Rh
n/%		 BB/Rh BV/Rh
Females 85/25.5 129/38.7 16/4.8 15/4.5 10/3.0 2/0.6 73/80.2 2/2.2 1/3.7 1/3.7 2/7.4 2/7.4 1/3.7 3/11.1 9/33.3 3/11.1 3/11.1
Males 11/3.3 26/7.8 – – 2/0.6 – 5/5.5 – – – – – – – – – –
Nymphs 3/0.9 29/8.7 2/0.6 – – – 11/12.1 – 1/3.7 – – – – – 1/3.7 – –
Total 99/29.7 184/55.2 18/5.4 15/4.5 12/3.6 2/0.6 89/97.8 2/2.2 2/7.4 1/3.7 2/7.4 2/7.4 1/3,7 3/11.1 10/37.0 3/11.1 3/11.1
Open in a new tab

BG B. garinii, BA B. afzelii, BB B. burgdorferi sensu stricto, BV B. valaisiana, BL B. lusitanie, BM B. miyamotoi, Aph Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Rm Rickettsia monacensis, Rh Rickettsia helvetica

a333 PCR + Borrelia: 330 individual occurrences and 3 dual co-incidences

Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Rickettsia spp.-infected ticks from ponies had prevalence of 1.5 % (26/1737) and 5.2 % (91/1737), respectively (Table 1). Among Rickettsia species, R. helvetica constituted 97.8 % and R. monacensis 2.2 % of all ticks with rickettsiae (Table 2). Comparing of infected stages showed that females (5.8 %) were significantly more frequently infected with Rickettsia than males (1.9 %, P < 0.005).

In I. ricinus collected from vegetation DNA of Bbsl (4.8 %; 18/371), A. phagocytophilum (1.3 %; 5/371) and R. helvetica (6.2 %; 23/371) was also detected. All infected ticks carried one pathogen (Table 3). Among 6 females one was infected with Rickettsia only and among 10 males two with A. phagocytophilum, and one of 103 larvae with Borrelia, but from 252 nymphs 16.7 % were infected with all 6 species of detected pathogens. Comparison of the stages is difficult as the ratio between different number of tick’s stages from vegetation are diverse from the ones found on ponies excluding nymphs. Comparing the infection rate of the nymphs and performing the statistics showed that feeding nymphs (184/35/19.2 %) were significantly more infected with Borrelia spp. than the questing ones (252/17/6.7 %, P < 0.005). The similar comparison of the infection rate with A. phagocytophilum and Rickettsia for total number of ticks’ populations (from ponies and from vegetation) and for nymphs’ populations have not showed significant differences.

Infections with more than one pathogenic species were detected in 27 ticks, which constitutes 6.3 % of infected ticks involving mostly Bbsl and R. helvetica (Table 2).

Discussion

Because in some opinion, the molecular assessment of tick-borne pathogens from ticks collected from hosts or vegetation is a suitable way to evaluate the risk of emerging tick-borne diseases in a certain geographical area (Claerebout et al. 2013; Ionita et al. 2013) we examined feeding on ponies and questing I. ricinus ticks in the endemic area of Poland. The most frequently identified pathogens were members of the Bbsl genospecies complex. The population of I. ricinus collected from ponies displayed a high percentage of Borrelia infection (19.2 %), higher than in those collected from vegetation (4.8 %, P < 0.005) of surrounding meadows where ponies were grazed. The comparing of nymphs’ stages showed that feeding nymphs (184/35/19.2 %) were significantly more frequently infected with Borrelia spp. than the questing ones (252/17/6.7 %, P < 0.005), but due to the limited sample sizes, Borrelia prevalence rates could have not been calculated for other ticks’ stages removed from ponies and from vegetation. The percentage of infection of these questing populations of I. ricinus was comparable to the results obtained in the earlier studies of different vegetation sites in north-west Poland (Wodecka 2003; Skotarczak et al. 2008; Wodecka et al. 2010). Such a result, as well as the percentage of the infected adult stages and nymphs of I. ricinus ticks fed (or quite-fed) with ponies’ blood could be a suggestion that these ticks obtained the infection from ponies.

Horses are often described as accidental hosts for these pathogens due to the lack of high and persistent bacteremia (Butler et al. 2005; Hansen et al. 2010). However, animals which spend most of their lives out in the open air get a high exposure risk to the tick bites, may obtain infection repeatedly with tick-borne pathogens, especially in grazing horses what gives possibility to spread. Therefore, even though they do not act as a competent reservoir for Bbsl because they do not maintain persistent bacteremia, it is evident that these equine hosts may play an important role in the epidemiological cycle of these bacteria.

In Europe, the three most pathogenic species of B. burgdorferi s.l. (Bbss, B. afzelii, B. garinii) are characterized by a different organotropic and pathogenic potential and different species are connected with distinct clinical manifestations of the diseases in humans. So far, very little is known of the pathogenic role of the species of B. burgdorferi s.l. in horses because molecular methods are applied for differentiation of Borrelia species or strains and they are not commonly used in the veterinary diagnostics (Gall and Pfister, 2006). It is thought that variation in clinical signs of B. burgdorferi infecting horses might be due to infection with the same different species similar to those in humans (Butler et al. 2005). DNA of B. afzelii in I. ricinus ticks feeding on horses was found in Romania (Ionita et al. 2013), DNA of B. lusitanie in blood of horses in Lazio, a region of Central Italy (Veronesi et al. 2012). In our studies of I. ricinus collected from ponies, among Bbsl species, five were detected and the dominant species was B. afzelii and B. garinii. Furthermore, B. miyamotoi related to relapsing fever group was detected in I. ricinus collected from the ponies too. Our study confirms the presence of species linked to Lyme borreliosis in I. ricinus ticks in Poland and additionally adds new geographic area to the previous findings.

Vector of A. phagocytophilum are ticks of Ixodes genus, in Europe, they are mainly species belonging to the I. persulcatus-complex, i.e. I. ricinus and I. persulcatus (Paulauskas et al. 2012; Tomanović et al. 2013). The presence of DNA of these bacteria varies within wide limits in European countries.

Wild animals are indicated as a main reservoir for A. phagocytophilum, especially wild ruminants, such as white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) in the USA (Johnson et al. 2011) or red deer (Capreolus capreolus) and roe deer (Cervus elaphus) in Europe (Hulínská et al. 2004; Skotarczak et al. 2008; Stuen et al. 2013). Among domestic animals, small farm ruminants are mostly exposed to A. phagocytophilum infection, such as calves, sheep and goats, while the genetic material of Anaplsma is rarely detected in the blood of dogs, cats or horses (Stuen et al. 2013). The results of studies of Passamonti et al. (2010) show that horses do not seem to be an appropriate reservoir for A. phagocytophilum bacteria.

In Poland, anaplasmosis is a relatively new disease which may cause both therapeutic and diagnostic difficulties in veterinary medicine (Dzięgiel et al. 2013). In Polish studies by Adaszek and Winiarczyk (2011) DNA of A. phagocytophilum was found in the blood of horses with clinical symptoms such as movement disorders, fever and debilitation. In our studies of I. ricinus collected from ponies, in spite of the high prevalence of ticks on ponies during summer and early autumn months, there is evidence of very little DNA of A. phagocytophilum, consistent with our present and earlier studies of I. ricinus collected from the vegetation or game animals (Skotarczak et al. 2008), also in north-western part of our country, which showed a low percentage of ticks with DNA of A. phagocytophilum. Our result of a low range of occurrence of A. phagocytophilum does not eliminate ponies as a reservoir or host but is associated with a low percentage of infection of I. ricinus with this bacteria in this area. Thus, ponies probably can contribute to the natural cycle of A. phagocytophilum.

In presented studies of ticks collected from ponies, two different Rickettsia species were identified. R. helvetica was the most common and abundant species and the other species, R. monacensis was found in only two females. Whereas in questing I. ricinus we identified one species R. helvetica only, but prevalence of Rickettsia spp. in that two tick populations was parallel (5.2 % from ponies and 6.2 % from vegetation) as well as results of analyzed populations of I. ricinus, questing ticks collected from the vegetation from different sites of the same region of Poland (Western Pomerania).

Ticks are a very important link in the life cycle of bacteria of the Rickettsia genus. Due to the effective transstadial, transovarial and very rarely described transspermal transmissions, these arachnids can function not only as a vector, but also a reservoir of bacteria (Raoult and Roux 1997; Sprong et al. 2009). The model of circulation of Rickettsia sp. including multiplication phase of rickettsiae in the blood of vertebrates has not been confirmed yet.

Overzier et al. (2013) compared the infection of engorged ticks collected from roe deer C. capreolus and questing ticks collected from vegetation and they received high results, 16.6 and 13.9 %, respectively, although the differences were not statistically significant. At the same time, the presence of DNA of Rickettsia was not detected in blood, spleen and skin of animals, which could testify against the hypothesis indicating vertebrate animals as a potential reservoir of bacteria. Similar results were obtained by Stańczak et al. (2009) from middle-western part of Poland. However, Sprong et al. (2009) suggest that wild animals are involved in the spread of rickettsiae. As a potential reservoir for these bacteria they define a mouse (29 % of R. helvetica+), roe deer (19 % of R. helvetica+) and wild boar (6.9 % of R. helvetica+), while no Rickettsia DNA was found in blood of red deer, although the I. ricinus often feeds on this species. The results obtained by Sprong et al. (2009) may confirm the participation of some vertebrates in the life cycle of some species of Rickettsia spp., at least for a short period of time (short-term bacteremia).

In Europe, the prevalence of tick carrying multiple pathogens has been reported by many studies. For the reason that mixed infections (including species of same genus) and coinfections (including species of different genera) are of medical importance, it is crucial to determine the prevalence of ticks infected by more than one pathogen. In our earlier studies of ticks collected from the vegetation we showed for the first time in our country a double and triple co-incidence of tick-borne pathogens in I. ricinus (Skotarczak et al. 2003). Later, co-infections with tick-borne agents were observed in I. ricinus from game animals or in tissues of these animals (Skotarczak et al. 2008) and of dogs (Skotarczak and Wodecka 2003). In horses, the occurrence and characteristics of co-infections with multiple tick-borne agents have not been documented yet, but they seem to be common in some parts of the world (Hansen et al. 2010; Ybañez et al. 2013). In the study of Laus et al. (2013) blood samples from 300 Italian horses were analyzed for the presence of antibodies against tick-borne agents and their DNA and 24 animals were found to have a double infection, 2 triple, but no special clinical signs were observed in any of these animals. In our present studies of feeding I. ricinus collected from ponies, infections with more than one pathogenic species, involving mostly Bbsl and R. helvetica were detected in only 6.3 % of all infected ticks. However, it must be taken into account for risk assessment of human diseases, especially as these animals are maintained for recreational purposes.

Conclusions

The results of the present study confirm the presence of very diverse bacterial pathogens at the domestic host-tick interface, with the potential to cause both animal and human disease. A higher percentage of fed with blood ticks infected with Bbsl than questing ones suggests that an infection was acquired from horses and ticks are a composition in the epidemiological cycle of Bbsl. Probably ponies also could contribute to the natural cycle of A. phagocytophilum and R. helvetica.

The cognizance of the prevalence of these infectious agents in ticks collected from ponies is an important criterion for risk assessment of human diseases, especially as these animals are maintained for recreational purposes and lots of ticks are present on them. Additionally, the results suggest that there may be accidental simultaneous double transmission of tick-borne pathogens to human beings. This is the first study reporting tick-borne pathogens prevalence in ticks removed from horses in Poland.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported financially by Grant No. N N303 806140 from the National Science Centre, Poland. Authors are indebted for the ticks’ collection to Mr. Jerzy Dmochowski, owner of Imno pony stud.

References

  1. Adaszek Ł, Winiarczyk S. Identification of Anaplasma spp.-rickettsia isolated from horses from clinical disease cases in Poland. Zoonoses Public Health. 2011;58:514–518. doi: 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2011.01394.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bakken JS, Dumler JS. Human granulocytic ehrlichiosis. Clin Infect Dis. 2000;3(2):554–560. doi: 10.1086/313948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Butler CM, Houwers DJ, Jongejan F, van der Kolk JH. Borrelia burgdorferi infections with special reference to horses. A review. Vet Q. 2005;27(4):146–156. doi: 10.1080/01652176.2002.9695196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Casjens SR, Fraser-Liggett CM, Mongodin EF, Qiu WG, Dunn JJ, Luft BJ, Schutzer SE. Whole genome sequence of an unusual Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato isolate. J Bacteriol. 2011;193(6):1489–1490. doi: 10.1128/JB.01521-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Claerebout E, Losson B, Cochez C, Casaert S, Dalemans AC, De Cat A, Madder M, Saegerman C, Heyman P, Lempereur L. Ticks and associated pathogens collected from dogs and cats in Belgium. Parasit Vectors. 2013;6:183. doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-6-183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dzięgiel B, Adaszek Ł, Kalinowski M, Winiarczyk S. Equine granulocytic anaplasmosis. Res Vet Sci. 2013;95(2):316–320. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2013.05.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Franke J, Fritzsch J, Tomaso H, Straube E, Dorn W, Hildebrandt A. Coexistence of pathogens in host-seeking and feeding ticks within a single natural habitat in Central Germany. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010;76(20):6829–6836. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01630-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gall Y, Pfister K. Survey on the subject of equine Lyme borreliosis. Int J Med Microbiol. 2006;296(40):274–279. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2006.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gordon WS, Brownlee A, Wilson DR, Macleod J. Tick-borne fever: a hitherto undescribed disease of sheep. J Comp Pathol. 1932;45:301–307. doi: 10.1016/S0368-1742(32)80025-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hansen MG, Christoffersen M, Thuesen LR, Petersen MR, Bojesen AM. Seroprevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato and Anaplasma phagocytophilum in Danish horses. Acta Vet Scand. 2010;52:3. doi: 10.1186/1751-0147-52-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hulínská D, Langrová K, Pejcoch M, Pavlásek I. Detection of Anaplasma phagocytophilum in animals by real-time polymerase chain reaction. APMIS. 2004;112(4–5):239–247. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0463.2004.apm11204-0503.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ionita M, Mitrea IL, Pfister K, Hamel D, Silaghi C. Molecular evidence for bacterial and protozoan pathogens in hard ticks from Romania. Vet Parasitol. 2013;196(1–2):71–76. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2013.01.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Jahn P, Zeman P, Bezdekova B, Praskova I. Equine granulocytic anaplasmosis in the Czech Republic. Vet Rec. 2010;166(21):646–649. doi: 10.1136/vr.4852. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Johnson RC, Kodner C, Jarnefeld J, Eck DK, Xu Y. Agents of human anaplasmosis and Lyme disease at Camp Ripley, Minnesota. Vector Born Zoonotic Dis. 2011;11(12):1529–1534. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2011.0633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Laus F, Veronesi F, Passamonti F, Paggi E, Cerquetella M, Hyatt D, Tesei B, Fioretti DP. Prevalence of tick borne pathogens in horses from Italy. J Vet Med Sci. 2013;75(6):715–720. doi: 10.1292/jvms.12-0449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Levin ML, Nicholson WL, Massung RF, Sumner JW, Fish D. Comparison of the reservoir competence of medium-sized mammals and Peromyscus leucopus for Anaplasma phagocytophilum in Connecticut. Vector Born Zoonotic Dis. 2002;2(3):125–136. doi: 10.1089/15303660260613693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lommano E, Bertaiola L, Dupasquier C, Gern L. Infections and coinfections of questing Ixodes ricinus ticks by emerging zoonotic pathogens in Western Switzerland. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012;78:4606–4612. doi: 10.1128/AEM.07961-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Mannelli A, Bertolotti L, Gern L, Gray J. Ecology of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato in Europe: transmission dynamics in multi-host systems, influence of molecular processes and effects of climate change. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2012;36(4):837–861. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2011.00312.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Nieder M, Silaghi C, Hamel D, Pfister K, Schmäschke R, Pfeffer M. Tick-borne fever caused by Anaplasma phagocytophilum in Germany: first laboratory confirmed case in a dairy cattle herd. Tierarztl Prax Ausg G Grosstiere Nutztiere. 2012;40(2):101–106. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Nilsson K, Jaenson TG, Uhnoo I, Lindquist O, Pettersson B, Uhlén M, Friman G, Påhlson C. Characterization of a spotted fever group Rickettsia from Ixodes ricinus ticks in Sweden. J Clin Microbiol. 1997;35(1):243–247. doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.1.243-247.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Oteo JA, Portillo A. Tick-borne rickettsioses in Europe. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2012;3(5–6):271–278. doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2012.10.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Overzier E, Pfister K, Herb I, Mahling M, Böck G, Jr, Silaghi C. Detection of tick-borne pathogens in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus), in questing ticks (Ixodes ricinus), and in ticks infesting roe deer in southern Germany. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2013;4:320–328. doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2013.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Passamonti F, Veronesi F, Cappelli K, Capomaccio S, Coppola G, Marenzoni ML, Piergili FD, Verini SA, Coletti M. Anaplasma phagocytophilum in horses and ticks: a preliminary survey of Central Italy. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 2010;33(1):73–83. doi: 10.1016/j.cimid.2008.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Paulauskas A, Radzijevskaja J, Rosef O. Molecular detection and characterization of Anaplasma phagocytophiulm strains. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012;35:187–195. doi: 10.1016/j.cimid.2012.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Polin H, Hufnagl P, Haunschmid R, Gruber F, Ladurner G. Molecular evidence of Anaplasma phagocytophilum in Ixodes ricinus ticks and wild animals in Austria. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42(5):2285–2286. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.5.2285-2286.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Raoult D, Roux V. Rickettsioses as paradigsm of new or emerging infectious diseases. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1997;10(4):694–719. doi: 10.1128/cmr.10.4.694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Rymaszewska A, Adamska M. Molecular evidence of tick-borne pathogens co-infecting dogs from Poland. Acta Vet Hung. 2011;59(2):215–223. doi: 10.1556/AVet.2011.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Rymaszewska A, Piotrowski M. Use of DNA sequences for Rickettsia identification in Ixodes ricinus ticks: the first detection of Rickettsia monacensis in Poland. Microbes Infect. 2013;15:140–146. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2012.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Skotarczak B, Wodecka B. Molecular evidence of the presence of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato in the blood samples taken from dogs in Poland. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2003;10:113–115. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Skotarczak B, Rymaszewska A, Wodecka B, Sawczuk M. Molecular evidence of coinfection of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato, human granulocytic ehrlichiosis agent, and Babesia microti in ticks from northwestern Poland. J Parasitol. 2003;89(1):194–196. doi: 10.1645/0022-3395(2003)089[0194:MEOCOB]2.0.CO;2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Skotarczak B, Wodecka B, Rymaszewska A, Sawczuk M, Maciejewska A, Adamska M, Hermanowska-Szpakowicz T, Swierzbińska R. Prevelance of DNA and antibodies to Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato in dogs suspected of borreliosis. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2005;12(2):199–205. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Skotarczak B, Adamska M, Sawczuk M, Maciejewska A, Wodecka B, Rymaszewska A. Coexistence of tick-borne pathogens in game animals and ticks in western Poland. Vet Med. 2008;53(12):668–675. [Google Scholar]
  33. Sprong H, Wielinga PR, Fonville M, Reusken C, Brandenburg AH, Borgsteede F, Gaasenbeek C, van der Giessen JW. Ixodes ricinus ticks are reservoir hosts for Rickettsia helvetica and potentially carry flea-borne Rickettsia species. Parasites Vectors. 2009;2(1):41. doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-2-41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Stańczak J, Racewicz M, Michalik J, Cieniuch S, Sikora B, Skoracki M. Prevalence of infection with Rickettsia helvetica in feeding ticks and their hosts in western Poland. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2009;2:328–329. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2008.02261.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Stefanciková A, Adaszek Ł, Pet’ko B, Winiarczyk S, Dudinák V. Serological evidence of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato in horses and cattle from Poland and diagnostic problems of Lyme borreliosis. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2008;15(1):37–43. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Stuen S, Granquist EG, Silaghi C. Anaplasma phagocytophilum – a widespread multi-host pathogen with highly adaptive strategies. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2013;3:31. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2013.00031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Tomanović S, Chochlakis D, Radulović Z, Milutinović M, Ćakić S, Mihaljica D, Tselentis Y, Psaroulaki A. Analysis of pathogen co-occurrence in host-seeking adult hard ticks from Serbia. Exp Appl Acarol. 2013;59:367–376. doi: 10.1007/s10493-012-9597-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Veronesi F, Laus F, Passamonti F, Tesei B, Piergili Fioretti D, Genchi C. Occurrence of Borrelia lusitaniae infection in horses. Vet Microbiol. 2012;160(3–4):535–538. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2012.06.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Wodecka B. Detection of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato DNA in Ixodes ricinus ticks in north-western Poland. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2003;10(2):171–178. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Wodecka B. flaB gene as a molecular marker for distinct identification of Borrelia species in environmental samples by the PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism method. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011;77:7088–7092. doi: 10.1128/AEM.05437-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Wodecka B, Leońska A, Skotarczak B. A comparative analysis of molecular markers for the detection and identification of Borrelia spirochetes in Ixodes ricinus. J Med Microbiol. 2010;59:309–314. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.013508-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Wodecka B, Rymaszewska A, Skotarczak B. Host and pathogen DNA identification in blood meals of nymphal Ixodes ricinus ticks from forest parks and rural forests of Poland. Exp Appl Acarol. 2014;62(4):543–555. doi: 10.1007/s10493-013-9763-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Ybañez AP, Sato F, Nambo Y, Fukui T, Masuzawa T, Ohashi N, Matsumoto K, Kishimoto T, Inokuma H. Survey on tick-borne pathogens in Thoroughbred horses in the Hidaka district, Hokkaido, Japan. J Vet Med Sci. 2013;75(1):11–15. doi: 10.1292/jvms.12-0282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Experimental & Applied Acarology are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES