Abstract
The stability of phosphorene is shown to be degraded by water. However, the presence of a small amount of water allows the synthesis of high‐quality material in liquid exfoliation of black phosphorus using dimethylsulfoxide as solvent. A phosphorus/water molar ratio between 1.5 and 14 maximizes the quality of the phosphorene flakes and their stability.
Keywords: black phosphorus, liquid exfoliation, two‐dimensional materials, phosphorene
Since the first reports by Ye and co‐workers1 and Zhang and co‐workers2 on the micromechanical exfoliation of bulk‐layered black phosphorus (BP) were published in January 2014,3 more than two hundred papers have been published up to today, dealing with experimental and mostly theoretical studies on phosphorene, the 2D BP monolayer.4 The so‐called “renaissance” of BP arises from the unique properties of this material, endowed with a direct band gap of 0.3 eV in the bulk which increases to 2.0 eV going down to the monolayer. In addition to its intrinsic semiconducting properties, its puckered structure5 gives anisotropic in‐plane properties that make BP and its 2D derivative, phosphorene, very promising candidates for nanoelectronics and nanophotonics applications.6 Therefore, the preparation of high‐quality single‐ and few‐layer nanosheets of BP has attracted enormous interest in the scientific community. First the micromechanical cleavage (Scotch tape method) was applied successfully as mentioned above, then the liquid exfoliation7 and the electrochemical exfoliation8 of BP were explored as well. Several groups were working simultaneously and independently on the liquid exfoliation of BP under sonication. Therefore, distinct contributions came out in a relatively short time.7 In particular, Hersam and co‐workers[[qv: 7c]] and Salehi‐Khojin and co‐workers successfully performed the liquid exfoliation of BP in dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) and dimethylformamide, both having a high dielectric constant and a high surface tension which are prerequisite. Molecular dynamics simulations showed that the cohesive energy between the solvent molecules and BP layer is very important and explains why DMSO, having a strong adhesion with phosphorene, assures a great stability of the dispersion with time.9 A recent paper by Warren and co‐workers surveyed 18 organic solvents for their ability to exfoliate BP. A successful scale up of the exfoliation process of BP at the 10 g scale was achieved using N‐methyl‐2‐pyrrolidone (NMP). Ultrathin BP nanosheets were prepared by Xie and co‐workers sonicating grinded BP in water, the substitution of an organic solvent with water was highly relevant and allowed the authors to test the resultant BP suspension in biological applications. In our laboratories, the liquid exfoliation of BP in dimethylsulfoxide DMSO was repeated analyzing carefully the amount of water present in DMSO, being this a highly hygroscopic solvent that always contains traces of water, even after treatment with drying agents. Surprisingly, water resulted to be not an innocent player in the process under study. We therefore performed a systematic study evaluating the influence of the amount of water on the exfoliation, stability of the resulting suspension, and quality of phosphorene flakes.
Highly pure and crystalline BP was prepared following a published procedure.10 The liquid exfoliation was carried out in DMSO containing H2O using an ultrasonication bath working at 37 KHz frequency, while keeping the suspension under nitrogen in a sealed glass vial and in the dark. Recently some authors have outlined the importance of anaerobic and dark environments for both the mechanical and liquid exfoliation of BP nanosheets that can irreversibly degrade to oxidized compounds.11 In particular, the environmental instability of mechanically exfoliated few‐layer BP was investigated,[10a] but the influence of the amount of water in the liquid exfoliation process has not yet been analyzed in detail.
As shown in Scheme 1 , three different ranges of molar ratio between BP and water were studied: a) molar ratio (P/H2O) ≥ 15, b) molar ratio (P/H2O) between 14 and 1.5; c) molar ratio (P/H2O) between 1.4 and 0.3. The limits chosen are a compromise mainly between the stability of exfoliated BP, the stability of the suspensions, and the quality of flakes. For instance, the product of the exfoliation of BP with a molar ratio of 15 already decomposes during the sonication experiment. On the opposite side, when a molar ratio P/H2O less then 1.4 was used, a bad quality material was obtained with most flakes' thickness greater than 100 nm. Finally, in the intermediate P/H2O range (between 14 and 1.5) “good” quality phosphorene flakes, in terms of stability of the suspension and thickness of the exfoliated flakes, were always be obtained.
In case (a), we dealt with residual water, usually present in commercially available dry DMSO. The relative content was properly measured by 1H NMR, while in cases (b) and (c) a specific amount of water was added. After sonication for an appropriate period of time, three different suspensions were obtained, which looked quite different as shown in Scheme 1. They were analyzed by 1H, 31P{1H}, and 31P NMR at regular intervals of time, each time allowing the suspension to stand by for 3 h, performing the measurements, and then proceeding with the ultrasonication.
After 20 h of sonication, the characterization of the suspensions of BP nanoflakes was carried out by drop‐casting the sol on a suitable support, in the case of atomic force microscopy (AFM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and Raman onto a 300 nm silicon dioxide on silicon wafer, or onto a carbon copper grid for transmission electron microscopy (TEM), leaving the suspension in contact with the support for 2 min to allow for the formation of a film, before washing with acetone, and drying with a dry nitrogen flow.
Test A) P/H2O ≥ 15: 31P{1H} NMR was measured in the course of exfoliation and showed in the beginning the formation of species with resonances between +6 ppm and −13 ppm, which gradually disappeared, see Figure 1 . After 14 h of sonication, the solution looked clear and yellow, while the initial amount of BP was completely converted as evidenced by the disappearance of the dark grey solid while 31P{1H} NMR showed the presence of a soluble species having a featureless singlet at −24.9 ppm, see top spectrum in Figure 1.
The resonances at 1.4 and −1.1 ppm, which first arose in the 31P spectrum, were unequivocally assigned to phosphorous acid, H3PO3, and phosphoric acid, H3PO4, respectively, by adding to the sonicated sample (4 h), a small amount of these oxyacids (see also Figures S1 and S2, Supporting Information).12
Noticeably, the formation of H3PO3 as a degradation product in the liquid exfoliation of BP has been recently predicted by Coleman and co‐workers,13 who theoretically investigated the water degradation of few‐layer BP. They anticipated that phosphorene disproportionation should also generate PH3, which however was never detected in our experiments
The other degradation products resonating at −13.1 and −24.9 ppm were assigned to pyrophosphate, [HP2O6]−, and to trimetaphosphate [H2P3O9]−, respectively, on the basis of high‐resolution ESI MS (Figure 2 ) and by comparison with mass spectral data of these compounds.14 The peaks at m/z= 256.90217, m/z = 176.93592, and m/z = 158.92544 can be attributed to derivatives coming from the hydrolysis of trimetaphosphate.15
Although further mechanistic studies are needed and further experiments are in progress, we can hypothesize that the formation of polyphosphate anions during the BP exfoliation in anhydrous DMSO originates from DMSO itself. In agreement with this hypothesis, the 1H NMR spectrum carried out after prolonged sonication (20 h), showed, apart from a singlet at δ = 14.1, (Figure S3, Supporting Information), which is typical for the acidic proton of polyphosphates, a singlet at 2.6 ppm, which was attributed to dimethylsulfide.16 The presence of SMe2 implicates that DMSO may effectively transfer oxygen atoms to phosphorus during the degradation of exfoliated phosphorene sheets in anhydrous DMSO. This intriguing and unexpected reaction mechanism is currently under study in our group by means of theoretical calculations and selected NMR tests on specific samples (including different allotropes of elemental phosphorus).
In practice, when DMSO is “really” anhydrous, the exfoliation of BP is likely complete but as soon as BP is exfoliated, most of the nanosheets react with the solvent under the current ultrasound conditions, causing an extended cleavage of the P–P bond network, which eventually results in the formation of degradation products as discussed above. In line with this hypothesis, no BP atomic layers were observed by optical microscopy, AFM and TEM, but only drops of the solvent, see Figure S6 and S7 in the Supporting Information.
Test B) 1.5 < P/H2O < 14: Working with a P/H2O molar ratio higher than 1.5 yielded a brown suspension. After 20 h sonication, centrifugation at 6000 rpm for 1 h left a gray solid residue and a light yellow supernatant (see Figure 3 ).
After sedimentation of the heavier flakes, inspection of the yellow supernatant with optical microscope, AFM, micro‐Raman, and TEM revealed that the dark residue is constituted by BP flakes having a high number of atomic layers (i.e., height profile from 30 to 100 nm), while the yellow supernatant contains more homogeneous and “lighter” phosphorene flakes having few atomic layers, with an average size 500 × 800 nm2, see TEM image in Figure 4 .
The chemical quality of the BP flakes was assessed by carrying out an EDX (energy‐dispersive X‐ray spectroscopy) analysis (Figure S9, Supporting Information). We observed only the peak corresponding to P element, and to copper, due to the support.
AFM analysis on the same sample confirmed the nanosheets are homogeneous on a large scale with heights ranging from few nanometers to ten nanometers. Figure 5 shows the height map and the relative height profile. Considering a layer‐to‐layer spacing of 0.53 nm, the thickness of ≈2 nm shown in Figure 5 corresponds to four atomic layers of BP. AFM and Raman measurements were carried out under air, indicating the sample does not degrade during the time of measurements.
31P and 31P{1H} NMR studies were carried out at regular intervals of time during the sonication and showed the presence in solution of only H3PO3 and H3PO4 as side‐products (see Figure S8, Supporting Information). The degradation of phosphorene to P‐oxyacids in this range of P/H2O molar ratio was a minor process and it was not accompanied by formation of polyphosphates, as occurred in Test A. Additionally, we verified that the dispersion of phosphorene in DMSO was stable at room temperature under nitrogen and in the dark for at least one week, while in air the stability was reduced to a few hours.
Powder X‐ray diffraction of the dark gray solid which settled down after centrifugation was also carried out to confirm the nature of the sample and its purity. As shown in Figure 6 , only few peaks were observed, which correspond to the 020, 040, and 060 reflections of BP, while any other peaks were absent or extremely weak. This again confirms the purity of the sample because no other crystalline phases were detected, which is a consequence of the preferred orientation of BP flakes on the flat support showing that phosphorene layers form a film with the 2D (010)‐planes parallel to the support surface.
The Raman spectrum is shown in Figure 7 . It is averaged over the area shown in the inset, where the area of the Raman peak at ≈463 cm−1 is shown in arbitrary units (scale bar: 4 μm). Raman mapping revealed the three typical bands of phosphorene, centered at 363, 440, and 468 cm−1 attributed to A1 g, B2g, and A2 g vibrational modes, respectively. In keeping with the crystalline nature of the sample, the average ratio between the area of the A2 g and A1 g peaks was ≈2.4, confirming the multilayer nature of our samples.17
Test C) 0.3 < P/H2O < 1.4: Running the same sonication experiment in DMSO with a larger amount of water (P/H2O molar ratio equal to 0.7) in the same way did not afford any homogeneous sample in the optical microscopy, while AFM and Raman showed piles of BP flakes together with large empty areas, see Figure 8 . The thickness of the flakes was higher than in Test B and ranged from 30 to about 200 nm. We deduce that under these experimental conditions the liquid exfoliation was least effective.
SEM and TEM measurements showed BP flakes with jagged borders and irregular shape, see Figure 9 and Figure S10 (Supporting Information), respectively. Moreover, the lateral dimension of the layers was far from being homogeneous, ranging from a small size, i.e., 120 nm to a larger size, 2300 nm.
During SEM measurements, an EDX analysis performed on the BP flakes (see Figure 9, right side) detected phosphorus the silicon peak being due to the support, indicating the high purity of our sample and the absence of oxidation on BP nanosheets.
31P and 31P{1H} NMR were again carried out at regular intervals of time during the sonication and showed again the presence in solution of only H3PO3 and H3PO4 as side‐products (Figure S12, Supporting Information). As for case B, the degradation of phosphorene P‐acids in this range of P/H2O molar ratio, was a secondary process not affording any phosphates.
In summary, for the first time the role of water content in the process of liquid exfoliation of BP carried out in DMSO was experimentally studied. Combining microscopy techniques, such as TEM and AFM, with NMR spectroscopy and ESI MS analysis, the dramatic influence of water emerged, which can stir the process towards the formation of high‐quality BP nanosheets or to undesired polyphosphorus molecular species. If the molar ratio P/H2O is greater than 15, degradation products are obtained particularly trimetaphosphate which are likely produced from oxidation by DMSO. In contrast, if the molar ratio P/H2O is in the range between 1.5 and 14, high‐quality flakes having lateral dimension ranging from 400 to 600 nm and thickness between 2 and 10 nm are obtained. Finally, when the molar ratio P/H2O is in the range between 1.4 and 0.3, the sample looks inhomogeneous, and larger flakes with thickness ranging from 10 to 200 nm and lateral dimensions up to 1600 nm are obtained.
Experimental Section
All chemicals were reagent grade and, unless otherwise stated, used as received by commercial suppliers. All reactions were carried out under a pure nitrogen atmosphere by using standard Schlenk or glove‐box techniques with freshly distilled and oxygen‐free solvents. Red phosphorus 99.99%, SnI4, Au foil, Tin wire, and anhydrous DMSO were supplied from Aldrich and used without further purification. DMSO‐d6 (Aldrich) was pre‐treated with three freeze‐thaw pump cycles before use. BP was prepared as described in the literature10 and stored in a vial under nitrogen and in the dark. The quality of the obtained BP crystals was checked by optical microscopy and by X‐ray powder diffraction.
The sonication bath was an Elmasonic P70H, operating at 37 kHz frequency.
Samples were first imaged with an optical microscope. Immediately after, they were transferred to an AFM for high‐resolution imaging. AFM scans were performed by a Dimension Icon (Bruker) instrument configured in “Scan‐Asyst” mode, where topography and in‐phase signal images were simultaneously acquired. Between measurements the samples were kept under a nitrogen atmosphere.
1H, 31P, and 31P{1H} NMR were routinely recorded using a Bruker Avance II 300 spectrometer. Peak positions are relative to tetramethylsilane and were calibrated against the residual solvent resonance (1H). Chemical shifts for 31P NMR spectra were measured relative to external 85% H3PO4 with downfield values reported as positive.
IR spectra were recorded with a Spectrum BX II Perkin–Elmer spectrometer. Samples were dried under vacuum warming up at ≈50 °C to eliminate DMSO and the resulting viscous oil was deposited on KBr platelets.
Raman spectra were collected with a custom‐built microspectrometer. The 488 nm line from an Ar laser was focused on the sample with a 63× objective with a numerical aperture of 0.9. The power on the sample was 0.3 mW. Light emitted by the sample was dispersed by an HR550 Jobin‐Yvon monochromator and the spectrum collected by a Synapse CCD.
TEM: Studies were carried out using a Philips instrument operating at an accelerating voltage of 100 kV.
SEM: Zeiss Ultraplus field emission SEM operated at an accelerating voltage of 5 keV.
EDX (SEM and TEM): Bruker Quantax 800 EDX having an energy resolution of ≈130 eV, and operated with an electron beam energy of 5 kV.
ESI‐MS spectra were recorded by direct introduction of the samples at 7 μL min−1 flow rate in an LTQ‐Orbitrap high‐resolution mass spectrometer (Thermo, San Jose, CA, USA), equipped with a conventional ESI source. The working conditions comprised the following: spray voltage 5 kV, capillary voltage 35 V, capillary temperature 275 °C, tube lens 50 V. The sheath, auxiliary, and the sweep gases were set, respectively, at 8 (arbitrary units), 2 (arbitrary units), and 2 (arbitrary units). For acquisition, Xcalibur 2.0. software (Thermo) and a nominal resolution (at m/z 400) of 100 000 were used.
The samples were prepared by dilution with acetonitrile of the reaction mixture in DMSO and the analysis was carried out in negative ion mode.
X‐ray powder diffraction (XRD) data were collected with an X'Pert PRO diffractometer with Cu Kα radiation (λ= 1.5418 Å). XRD spectra were acquired at room temperature with a PANalytical X'PERT PRO diffractometer, employing Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.54187 Å) and a parabolic MPD‐mirror for Cu radiation. The diagrams were acquired in a 2θ range between 10.0° and 5.0°, using a continuous scan mode with an acquisition step size of 0.0263° and a counting time of 54.6 s.
Test A: Molar Ratio (P/H2O) = 15: A 5 mm NMR test tube was charged with 0.6 mL of DMSO‐d6 (H2O ≈ 75 ppm) and crystalline BP (4.0 mg, 0.13 mmol) (P/H2O = 15). The mixture was freeze‐pump‐thaw degassed three times under nitrogen, before being sonicated (37 kHz) for 20 h keeping the temperature fixed at 30 °C.
Test B: Molar Ratio (P/H2O) = 2: A 5 mm NMR test tube was charged with 0.6 mL of DMSO‐d6 (H2O = 75 ppm), BP crystals (4.0 mg, 0.13 mmol), and deoxygenated water (1.0 μL, 0.056 mmol) (P/H2O = 2.0). The procedure was the same as Test A. Under these conditions, the suspension remained stable for at least one week.
Test C: Molar Ratio (P/H2O) = 0.7: A 5 mm NMR test tube was charged with 0.6 mL of DMSO‐d6 (H2O = 75 ppm), BP crystals (4.0 mg, 0.13 mmol), and deoxygenated water (3.0 μL, 0.167 mmol) (P/H2O = 0.7). The mixture was treated as in Test A. Under these conditions, the suspension remained stable for at least four weeks.
Supporting information
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (Grant Agreement No. 670173) for funding the project PHOSFUN “Phos phorene functionalization: a new platform for advanced multifunctional materials” through an ERC Advanced Grant. Thanks are due also to ECRF (FIRENZE HYDROLAB2) and CNR (National Research Council, Rome, Italy, through the projects PREMIALE 2011 and 2012) for financial support and for a research grant to M.S.R. Dr. Daniele Ercolani (NEST, Istituto Nanoscienze‐CNR and Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa, Italy) is thanked for running SEM and EDX measurements.
The copyright line of this paper was amended 5 April 2016 after initial publication.
Serrano‐Ruiz M., Caporali M., Ienco A., Piazza V., Heun S., Peruzzini M. (2016). The Role of Water in the Preparation and Stabilization of High‐Quality Phosphorene Flakes. Adv. Mater. Interfaces, 3: 1500441. doi: 10.1002/admi.201500441
This paper is dedicated to Professor Manfred Scheer on the occasion of his 60th birthday
References
- 1. Liu H., Neal A. T., Zhu Z., Luo Z., Xu X., Tomanek D., Ye P. D., ACS Nano 2014, 8, 4033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Li K., Yu Y. J., Ye G. J., Ge Q. Q., Ou X. D., Wu H., Feng D. L., Chen X. H., Zhang Y. B., Nat. Nanotechnol. 2014, 9, 372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Reich E. S., Nature 2014, 506, 19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Ling X., Wang H., Huang S., Xia F., Dresselhaus S., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 4523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Brown A., Rundqvist S., Acta Crystallogr. 1965, 19, 684. [Google Scholar]
- 6.a) Liu H., Du Y., Deng Y., Ye P. D., Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 2732; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Xia F., Wang H., Jia Y., Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 4458; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Du Y., Liu H., Deng Y., Ye P. D., ACS Nano 2014, 8, 10035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.a) Warren S. C., Woomer A. H., Wells R. A., Farnsworth T. W., US Patent appl. 62/031, 184, 2014; [Google Scholar]; b) Brent J. R., Savjani N., Lewis E. A., Haigh S. J., Lewis D. J., O'Brien P., Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 13338; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Kang J., Wood J. D., Wells S. A., Lee J.‐H., Liu X., Chen K.‐S., Hersam M. C., ACS Nano 2015, 9, 3596; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Yasaei P., Kumar B., Foroozan T., Wang C., Asadi M., Tuschel D., Indacochea J. E., Klie R. F., Salehi‐Khojin A., Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 1887; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e) Woomer A. H., Farnsworth T. W., Hu J., Wells R. A., Donley C. L., Warren S. C., ACS Nano 2015, 9, 8869; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f) Wang H., Yang X., Shao W., Chen S., Xie J., Zhang X., Wang J., Xie Y., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 11376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Erande M. B., Suryawanshi S. R., More M. A., Late D. J., Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2015, 2015, 3102. [Google Scholar]
- 9. Sresht V., Pádua A. A. H., Blankschtein D., ACS Nano 2015, 9, 8255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Nilges T., Kersting M., Pfeifer T., J. Solid State Chem. 2008, 181, 1707. [Google Scholar]
- 11.a) Island J. O., Steele G. A., van der Zant H. S. J., Castellanos‐Gomez A., 2D Mater. 2015, 2, 011002; [Google Scholar]; b) Wood J. D., Wells A. S., Jariwala D., Chen K. S., Cho E., Sangwan V. K., Liu X., Lauhon L. J., Marks T. J., Hersam M. C., Nano Lett. 2014, 14, 6964; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Koenig S. P., Doganov R. A., Schmidt H., Neto A. H. C., Ozyilmaz B., Appl. Phys. Lett. 2014, 104, 103106. [Google Scholar]; d) Favron A., Gaufrés E., Fossard F., Phaneuf‐L'Heureux A.‐L., Tang N. Y‐W., Lévesque P. L., Loiseau A., Leonelli R., Francoeur S., Martel R., Nat. Mater. 2015, 14, 826. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.In keeping with this assignment, the IR spectrum of the sonicated solution showed strong bands at 3347 cm−1 (νOH) and 1191 cm−1 (νPO), while a weak absorption at 2352 cm−1 was ascribed to νPH.
- 13. Hanlon D., Backes C., Doherty E., Cucinotta C. S., Berner N. C., Boland C., Lee K., Lynch P., Gholamvand Z., Harvey A., Zhang S., Wang K., Moynihan G., Pokle A., Ramasse Q. M., McEvoy N., Blau W. J., Wang J., Sanvito S., O'Regan D. D., Duesberg G. S., Nicolosi V., Coleman J. N., Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 8563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Choi B. K., Hercules D. M., Anal. Chem. 2000, 72, 5087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Lack S., Dulong V., Picton L., Le Cerf D., Condamine E., Carbohydr. Res. 2007, 342, 943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. This attribution was confirmed by syringing a small amount (30 μL) of a pure specimen of dimethylsulfide into the NMR tube.
- 17. Lu W., Nan H., Hong J., Chen Y., Zhu C., Liang Z., Ma X., Ni Z., Jin C., Zhang Z., Nano Res. 2014, 7, 853. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.