Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1992 Apr 1;89(7):2556–2560. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.7.2556

Genetic structure of forensic populations.

N E Morton 1
PMCID: PMC48700  PMID: 1557360

Abstract

DNA-based identification depends on the probability that two different individuals have the same phenotype, which is given by kinship theory. Together with the large and consistent body of evidence on human population structure, kinship theory provides a sound basis for forensic use of DNA markers.

Full text

PDF
2556

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Budowle B., Giusti A. M., Waye J. S., Baechtel F. S., Fourney R. M., Adams D. E., Presley L. A., Deadman H. A., Monson K. L. Fixed-bin analysis for statistical evaluation of continuous distributions of allelic data from VNTR loci, for use in forensic comparisons. Am J Hum Genet. 1991 May;48(5):841–855. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Caskey C. T. Comments on DNA-based forensic analysis. Am J Hum Genet. 1991 Oct;49(4):893-5, 899-903. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cohen J. E. DNA fingerprinting for forensic identification: potential effects on data interpretation of subpopulation heterogeneity and band number variability. Am J Hum Genet. 1990 Feb;46(2):358–368. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cotton R. W., Forman L., Word C. J. Research on DNA typing validated in the literature. Am J Hum Genet. 1991 Oct;49(4):898–903. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dodinval P. A. Population structure of A,B,O,AB blood groups in Belgium. Hum Hered. 1970;20(2):169–177. doi: 10.1159/000152306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Edwards A. W. Estimation of the inbreeding coefficient from ABO blood-group phenotype frequencies. Am J Hum Genet. 1971 Jan;23(1):97–98. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Imaizumi Y. Genetic structure in the United Kingdom. Hum Hered. 1974;24(2):151–159. doi: 10.1159/000152647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Imaizumi Y., Morton N. E. Isolation by distance in Japan and Sweden compared with other countries. Hum Hered. 1969;19(5):433–443. doi: 10.1159/000152252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lander E. S. Research on DNA typing catching up with courtroom application. Am J Hum Genet. 1991 May;48(5):819–823. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lewontin R. C., Hartl D. L. Population genetics in forensic DNA typing. Science. 1991 Dec 20;254(5039):1745–1750. doi: 10.1126/science.1845040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Malécot G. Heterozygosity and relationship in regularly subdivided populations. Theor Popul Biol. 1975 Oct;8(2):212–241. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(75)90033-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Mi M. P., Morton N. E. Blood factor association. Vox Sang. 1966 Jul-Aug;11(4):434–449. doi: 10.1111/j.1423-0410.1966.tb04240.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Morton N. E. Kinship, information and biological distance. Theor Popul Biol. 1975 Apr;7(2):246–255. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(75)90019-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Morton N. E., Klein D., Hussels I. E., Dodinval P., Todorov A., Lew R., Yee S. Genetic structure of Switzerland. Am J Hum Genet. 1973 Jul;25(4):347–361. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Sokal R. R., Wartenberg D. E. A Test of Spatial Autocorrelation Analysis Using an Isolation-by-Distance Model. Genetics. 1983 Sep;105(1):219–237. doi: 10.1093/genetics/105.1.219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Wooley J. R. A response to Lander: the courtroom perspective. Am J Hum Genet. 1991 Oct;49(4):892-3, 899-903. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Workman P. L., Lucarelli P., Agostino R., Scarabino R., Scacchi R., Carapella E., Palmarino R., Bottini E. Genetic differentiation among Sardinian villages. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1975 Sep;43(2):165–176. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330430204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Workman P. L., Mielke J. H., Nevanlinna H. R. The genetic structure of finland. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1976 Mar;44(2):341–367. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330440216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Wright S. W., Morton N. E. Genetic studies on cystic fibrosis in Hawaii. Am J Hum Genet. 1968 Mar;20(2):157–169. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Yasuda N. An extension of Wahlund's principle to evaluate mating ty frequency. Am J Hum Genet. 1968 Jan;20(1):1–23. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Yasuda N. Estimation of the inbreeding coefficient from phenotype frequencies by a method of maximum likelihood scoring. Biometrics. 1968 Dec;24(4):915–935. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Yee S., Morton N. E. Estimation of the inbreeding coefficient from ABO blood-group gene frequencies. Am J Hum Genet. 1970 Jan;22(1):112–113. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Zanardi P., Dell'Acqua G., Menini C., Barrai I. Population genetics in the province of Ferrara. I. Genetic distances and geographic distances. Am J Hum Genet. 1977 Mar;29(2):169–177. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES