Abstract
Tumor integrin β1 (ITGB1) contributes to primary tumor growth and metastasis, but its specific roles have yet been clearly elucidated. In this study, we engineered an three-dimensional microfluidic model of the human microvasculature to recapitulate the environment wherein extravasation takes place and assess the consequences of β1 depletion in cancer cells. Combined with confocal imaging, these tools allowed us to decipher the detailed morphology of transmigrating tumor cells and associated endothelial cells in vitro at high spatio-temporal resolution not easily achieved in conventional transmigration assays. Dynamic imaging revealed that β1-depleted cells lacked the ability to sustain protrusions into the subendothelial matrix in contrast to control cells. Specifically, adhesion via α3β1 and α6β1 to subendothelial laminin was a critical prerequisite for successful transmigration. β1 was required to invade past the endothelial basement membrane, whereas its attenuation in a syngeneic tumor model resulted in reduced metastatic colonization of the lung, an effect not observed upon depletion of other integrin alpha and beta subunits. Collectively, our findings in this novel model of the vascularized tumor microenvironment revealed a critical requirement for β1 in several steps of extravasation, providing new insights into the mechanisms underlying metastasis.
Introduction
Although major advances have been made in the screening and treatment of primary tumors, metastasis still remains the leading cause of cancer-related deaths. For a tumor cell to metastasize successfully, it must first dissociate from the primary tumor, traverse through tumor basement membrane (BM) and stroma, intravasate, survive in the circulation amongst a host of immune cells and mechanical stresses, and lastly, extravasate from the microvasculature and form metastases in the secondary parenchyma. In particular, the latter steps involving transendothelial migration (TEM) and survival have been described as rate-regulating events in metastasis 1,2.
This complex series of cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions is thought to involve integrins, the family of heterodimeric transmembrane receptors that mediate cellular interactions with the extracellular matrix (ECM). Integrins are widely known to regulate a variety of tumor cell functions including adhesion, migration, invasion, proliferation and survival 3. In particular, the β1 subunit forms heterodimers with at least 18 different alpha subunits, and has been shown to bind via its extracellular domain to a substantial number of ECM proteins, and via its intracellular domain to recruit many signaling and cytoskeletal proteins 4. In the context of cancer, β1 is up-regulated in highly invasive breast carcinoma cells in vivo 5,6, and plays crucial roles in the context of primary tumor formation and metastasis in breast, ovarian, pancreas and skin cancers 7–21. Further in vitro studies report that β1 strongly mediates adhesion of pancreatic and ovarian cancer cells to matrix proteins including collagen 1, collagen IV, fibronectin and laminin on 2D substrates 7,22, and promotes the degradation of gelatin at the whole cell level and localizes at invadopodia 23. In addition to its effects on adhesion, knockdown of β1 inhibits cell migration and proliferation on numerous ECM substrates 7,24. Collectively, these studies suggest the importance of β1 in mediating growth and migration in the primary tumor stroma.
The precise roles of β1 during tumor cell extravasation, however, are less explored. Although the molecular players in extravasation (e.g. ECM molecules, endothelium) are likely similar to those in invasion and intravasation, the mechanics and sequence of the cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions are different. Furthermore, the roles and degree of requirement of specific adhesion molecules may differ depending on the context of the migration event. Thus, results obtained in these contexts may not directly translate to extravasation. In terms of metastasis, it has been shown that inhibition of β1 significantly reduces seeding and formation of metastatic foci after several weeks, suggesting a possible defect in a preceding step of the metastatic cascade, such as extravasation 7,10,18,20,25,26. However, except for a study by Stoletov et al, which demonstrated the necessity of β1 for TEM in a zebrafish model, to our knowledge no other groups have explored in depth the role of β1 and the associated alpha subunits in distinct steps of extravasation.27 Furthermore, it remains unclear whether the defects lie in adhesion, tumor-endothelial interactions, ECM/BM interactions or even post-extravasation proliferation and survival. This is often difficult to dissect due to relatively low throughput and low spatio-temporal resolution of single cell TEM events in most in vivo assays.
In the present report, we utilize in vitro models of microvasculature to isolate and recapitulate the sequential steps in the extravasation cascade. Much is currently known about the cell adhesion molecules and proteases required by cancer cells to invade their microenvironment, but whether these same players are required for tumor cell extravasation are unclear. First, we find that β1 expression in human tumor cells lines is necessary for efficient TEM in an in vitro model of human microvasculature. High-resolution imaging further reveals the requirement of activated β1 integrin for protrusion maintenance via engagement with the sub endothelial ECM, which enables recruitment of F-actin to the protrusion tip, followed by translocation of the cell past the endothelial layer, likely via acto-myosin contractility. Specifically, adhesion onto vascular laminin via α3β1 and α6β1 integrins is involved in this process. Additionally, after clearing the endothelial barrier, β1 is required for invasion past the BM. Finally, we show that β1 depletion reduces extravasation in vivo and inhibits metastatic colonization, suggesting that the cumulative defects in the extravasation cascade due to β1 depletion ultimately impairs metastasis formation.
Materials and methods
Cell culture
GFP or RFP expressing human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) (Angioprotemie) were cultured in EGM-2MV medium (Lonza) and used at passage 4. Normal human lung fibroblasts (NHLF) (Lonza) were cultured in complete FGM (Lonza) and used between passages 4 to 8. MDA-MB-231, A-375 MA2 and 4T1 cells (parental, control and stable knockdowns) were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% penicillin/streptomycin and 1% L-glutamate while SUM159 cells were cultured in Ham F12 supplemented with 5% FBS, 1% penicillin/streptomycin, 5 μg/ml insulin, 1 μg/ml Hydrocortisone, and 20ng/ml EGF. All cells were incubated at 5% CO2 at 37ºC.
DNA constructs, RNA interference and transfection
To generate miR30-based shRNAs targeting human and mouse integrins, 97-bp shRNAs were designed (Supplemental Table 1), synthesized (IDT, Coralville, Iowa) and PCR amplified to add XhoI and EcoRI sites. shRNAs were then cloned into barcoded versions of the MSCV-ZSG-2A-Puro-miR30 vector 28 using standard molecular biology techniques. Packaging of retrovirus and transduction of cells was done as described previously 29. Efficient knockdown was then confirmed using western blotting, qPCR or flow cytometry as described below. Western blots were performed as described previously 28 using the indicated antibodies: for immunoblots on human cells, mouse monoclonal integrin β1 (MEM 101-A, Abcam), β3 (Cell Signaling), GAPDH (Cell Signaling) and beta-actin (Millipore). For mouse cell lines, rabbit polyclonal anti-mouse integrin α3, anti-mouse integrin αV (BD Pharmigen), and mouse anti-GAPDH (Millipore) were used. Quantitative PCR (qPCR) was performed for integrin β1 as described previously 28 using the MyiQ real-time PCR detection system (Bio-Rad). Flow cytometry was performed using the following primary antibodies to assess integrin surface levels: biotin conjugated anti-human β1 integrin (P5D1, Abcam), biotin-conjugated anti-mouse integrins αV, β1, β2, β3 (BD Pharmigen), or unconjugated rat anti-mouse integrin α1, α2, α4, α6, α8, β4 (BD Pharmigen). Secondary antibodies were either Streptavidin-APC, or APC-conjugated anti-Rat IgG.
For siRNA-mediated knockdown of α3, α6 and β4 integrins, cells were plated on six well plates and transfected with 25 pmol of α3, α6 or β4 integrin Silencer Select siRNA (Thermo Fischer) using Lipofectamine RNAiMax reagent (treated twice over 48 h) before trypsinization and perfusion into microvascular networks. Knockdown was confirmed via western blotting using antibodies for α3 (Thermo Scientific), α6 (Cell Signaling) and β4 (Cell Signaling). For visualization F-actin in transmigrating tumor cells, MDA-MB-231 were transduced with LifeAct mCherry (Ibidi) via standard lentiviral techniques.
Antibodies and reagents
For functional blocking of individual alpha subunits, azide-free antibodies for α1 (FB12), α2 (P1E6), α3 (P1B5), α4 (P4C2), α5 (P1D6), β4 (ASC-6), β1 (P4C10) and associated IgG1 or IgG3 controls from Millipore, and α6 (GoH3) and IgG2a from Santa Cruz were incubated at 5ug/mL with tumor cells suspended in serum free DMEM at 0.5 million cells/mL for 30 min, prior to perfusion into microvascular devices. For neutralization of MMPs, anti-MT1-MMP catalytic domain (LEM-2/63.1, Abcam) and anti-MMP-9 (IM09-L, Calbiochem) were incubated at 15 μg/mL with tumor cells suspended in serum free DMEM at 0.5 million cells/mL for 30 min prior to perfusion. The MMP array was from Raybiotech and used according to the manufacturer’s instructions. To block laminin function, anti-laminin alpha 3 chain (P3H9-2, R&D Systems) or IgG1 at 10 μg/mL in EGM was perfused into the microvascular devices 10 minutes prior to tumor perfusion.
Immunofluorescence and imaging analysis
Devices were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min, permeabilized with 0.1% Triton-X and then blocked with 10% BSA and 1% goat serum in PBS for 2 h. Samples were incubated in primary antibodies against human CD31, vinculin at 1:100 (Sigma Aldrich), human Tks-5 at 1:50 (Santa Cruz), human collagen IV, laminin, fibronectin, or β1 integrin activated conformation (clone 12G10) at 1:100 (from Abcam) overnight in blocking buffer at 4°C. After washing, devices were incubated with secondary antibody (Alexa Fluor 568 goat anti-mouse or 568 goat anti-rabbit) at 1:200, DAPI at 1:1000, and Alexa Fluor 647 phalloidin (all from Invitrogen) for 4 h.
Lungs were processed and stained as previously described 30. Briefly, lobes were cut into smaller pieces and blocked for 1 h (10% goat serum and 0.3% Triton-X), followed by incubation in mouse anti-CD 31 (BD Biosciences) at 1:100 overnight at 4°C. Lungs were washed in wash buffer and incubated in secondary antibody (Alexa Fluor 568 goat anti-rat, Invitrogen) at 1:500 overnight at 4°C.
Microfluidics-based microvascular network extravasation assay
A microfluidics-based cell culture system capable of generating perfusable microvascular networks was used in this study, similar to that described previously 31, with some modifications. Microfluidic device fabrication is outlined in detail elsewhere 32. The platform features three independent hydrogel regions (1300 μm wide by 110 μm high by 0.8 cm long) separated by media channels (SI Fig. 1A). ECM hydrogels are held in place via the surface tension generated in the presence of small trapezoidal microposts33. To form vascular networks, HUVECs and NHLFs were suspended separately at final concentrations of 5 × 106/mL and 4 × 106/mL respectively, in 2.5 mg/mL fibrinogen (Sigma) and 0.25 U/mL thrombin (Sigma) solutions. Tumor cells are introduced into the microvascular networks on day 4 of device culture, after which they were transferred to a confocal microscope (Olympus FV1000) equipped with an environmental chamber for imaging of extravasation events.
Microfluidics-based vertical endothelial monolayer extravasation assay
In some experiments, a microfluidics-based endothelial monolayer was used in place of microvascular networks to achieve visualization at greater spatial resolution of single cell extravasation events, due to its planar configuration34. Here, a single lumen is modeled by forming an intact monolayer on the hydrogel and micro-post surfaces (SI Fig. 1A). Briefly, a type 1 rat-tail collagen and fibrinogen were prepared obtain a final gel concentration of 2.5 mg/mL fibrin and 0.24 mg/mL collagen I mixture and injected. HUVECs suspended at 2.5 × 106/mL in EGM-2MV were then seeded into the media regions and cultured for 48 h at 37°C and 5% CO2 until a confluent monolayer was formed on the gel-media interface. Tumor cells at 0.1 million cells/mL were perfused into one media channel. Devices were tilted at a 90-degree angle at 37°C for 30 min in a humidified chamber.
Adhesion assay
To test the degree of tumor-endothelial adhesion without the added factor of physical trapping, rectangular PDMS micro-channels were fabricated (0.3 cm wide by 110 μm high by 5 cm long). Three inlet holes were punched (two on both ends and one in the middle). HUVECs (2 million cells/mL) were seeded into micro-channels. At the formation of a confluent monolayer, tumor cells at 1 million cells/mL in serum-free endothelial basal medium (EBM) were perfused from the outer inlet port (while keeping the center port plugged) and allowed to settle and adhere 10, 30 or 60 min. EBM is then perfused into the middle port via a syringe pump to obtain a shear rate of 5 dynes/cm2 for 15 min, after which tumor cells are recounted.
In vivo mouse extravasation assay
One hundred microliters of cell suspension in PBS (0.5 million cells) were injected via lateral tail vein of female NOD/SCID/gamma mice. Mice were euthanized and lungs were collected after inflation with 4% formaldehyde, 0.3% Triton X-100 at 3, 16 and 24 h.
In vivo metastasis assay
miR-30 based shRNAs targeting each integrin subunit were designed and cloned into uniquely barcoded versions of the MSCV-ZSG-2A-Puro-miR30 vector 28 as described above, and then used to stably transduce 4T1 cells. Once integrin knockdown was confirmed via FACs, individual 4T1 cell populations were mixed in equal numbers and injected into the lateral tail veins of mice. Lungs were isolated for analysis after 17 days. A starting population was also collected at the time the mixed cell populations were injected and was used for normalization of subsequent samples. Luminex-based analysis of metastasis burden was performed as described previously28. Briefly, genomic DNA was isolated from lungs and starting cell pellets and barcodes were PCR-amplified using biotinylated primers that bind to common regions in the vector that flank the DNA barcode. PCR product was then quantified by the Genetic Analysis Platform at the Broad Institute (Cambridge, MA) using Luminex technology. For this, PCR product was hybridized to uniquely dyed Xmap beads (Luminex Corporation) that were precoupled to oligonucleotide sequences complementary to the 21-nt barcodes contained in our vectors. Barcodes were then quantified by incubating the beads with streptavidin-conjugated allophycocyanin (APC) and measuring the APC signal on each bead using the Luminex FlexMap 3D system (Luminex Corporation). The relative amounts of each unique barcode in each lung sample were calculated from the raw APC signals. This was preformed by normalizing the signal for each unique barcode to the signal for the same barcode in the starting population.
Quantification of extravasation and statistics
In all in vitro experiments (unless otherwise indicated), the average TEM efficiency is the average of the mean of 3 devices per condition and 3 independent experiments (total 9 devices). The value of each device was calculated as an average of 6 fields of view (microvascular networks) or 10 fields of view (monolayer device). Statistical analysis was performed with SigmaPlot using Student’s two-tailed t-test when comparing two conditions, or ANOVA with Tukey’s post-hoc analysis when applicable. Unless otherwise indicated, “n” represents one independent experiment with at least 3 devices per condition.
Results
β1 integrins are required for efficient transendothelial migration from in vitro microvascular networks and in vivo mouse lung extravasation assays
To investigate the importance of integrin β1 in the extravasation, we employ a 3D microfluidic model of human microvascular networks previously developed by our group (Fig. 1A, SI 1A). The interconnected lumens formed via a vasculogenic-like process recapitulate the microcirculation in which tumor cells arrest due to size restriction and/or adhesion and extravasate, thereby exhibiting greater physiological relevance than most in vitro assays, in terms of geometry and barrier function. Tumor cells can be perfused into the microvessels and extravasation events can be monitored dynamically. Importantly, the assay allows significantly clearer real-time visualization of TEM on a single-cell level, compared to most in vivo and in vitro techniques. Lumens lie largely in the same plane, allowing intravascular, partially transmigrated and fully transmigrated cells to be clearly differentiated even at low magnifications (i.e. 10 to 20X) (Fig. 1D).
We stably expressed shRNAs targeting either control firefly luciferase (control) or integrin β1 (β1KD) in human metastatic human breast cancer (MDA-MB-231, SUM-159), highly metastatic human melanoma (A-375 MA2) and mouse mammary carcinoma (4T1) cell lines. Silencing was verified via western blotting (Fig. 1B, SI Fig. 2A), flow cytometry, and qPCR (Fig. SI 2B). Cells were perfused into in vitro microvascular networks and TEM events were tracked via live confocal microscopy (SI Movie 1). Reduction of β1 via shRNA and blocking antibodies in MDA-MB-231 significantly abrogated TEM in microdevices at 6 h, while knockdown of β3 integrin had no significant effects, indicating that the observed attenuation of TEM may be specific to β1 (Fig. 1C). In our assays, transmigration is defined as fully clearing the endothelial barrier. The β1-4 shRNA, with an intermediate level of knockdown (66% mRNA inhibition), exhibited an intermediate TEM rate at 6 h, suggesting a graded response with decreasing β1 expression (Fig. SI 2C). Longer-term kinetics of transmigration were tested in all cell lines revealing that the decrease in TEM due to β1 knockdown is likely not cell line specific. Furthermore, TEM rates reach a plateau at ~ 12 h in both control and β1KD conditions (Fig. 1E), indicating that the defects in transmigration are not simply due to a delay in the progression of extravasation. Additionally, proliferation assays reveal no significant differences between control and β1KD cells in the span of 48 h (Fig. SI 2D), thus the number of TEM events is likely not influenced by differences in cell proliferation throughout the duration of the transmigration assay.
To validate our findings in an in vivo context, MDA-MB-231 control and β1KD cells were injected into Nod/Scid/gamma mice via the lateral tail vein. Close inspection via confocal microscopy and 3D rendering at 60X allowed visualization of individual tumor cells near the tissue surface (Fig. 1F, Fig. SI 3A). Tumor cells surrounded by a continuous and distinct border of CD31 staining were scored as intravascular, while all other cells were counted as transmigrated, even if partly surrounded by vascular staining. Both control and β1KD cells were mainly contained within blood vessels at 3 h post injection. At 16 h there was a significant (~5 fold) difference in the number of transmigrated control cells versus β1KD, with the difference increasing at 24 h (Fig. 1G).
Combined, these results confirm that tumor integrin β1 is essential for TEM. However, the role of β1 in other distinct steps of extravasation (Fig. 2A) both preceding and subsequent to TEM remains unclear. These steps include tumor-endothelial adhesion, tumor cell protrusion initiation and formation into the sub-endothelial matrix, interaction with the endothelial BM, and migration through the parenchyma. Due to the challenges associated high resolution and dynamic imaging in vivo, we capitalized on the unique capabilities of our in vitro microvasculature assay.
β1 integrin does not mediate adhesion to endothelium but adhesion to sub-endothelial matrix, under flow conditions
We further investigated whether β1 integrin plays a role in heterotypic endothelial-tumor adhesion, a possible precursor to TEM. It is believed that since tumor cells that are rapidly cleared from the circulation in vivo, cells that quickly arrest in the vasculature and extravasate may have a selective advantage toward establishing new colonies 26,35.
To isolate the effect of adhesion, tumor cells were seeded into endothelial-lined chambers and allowed to settle and adhere for 10, 30 or 60 min. This is followed by continuous perfusion of media for 15 min at 5 dynes/cm2. With 30 or 60 min of settling time, more control cells remained adherent than β1KD cells post-perfusion, with the greatest difference being at 60 min (Fig. SI 4A). In contrast, 10 min of settling time prior to perfusion resulted in no significant differences. Upon closer inspection, more than half of all adherent cells in 30 or 60 min control samples had gained access to the subendothelial ECM, as identified by short (1–4 μm) tumor cell protrusions extending past the plane of the endothelium (Fig. SI 4A–B). In contrast, the few adherent β1KD cells did not exhibit protrusions. This suggests that β1 mediates adhesion to the underlying matrix, rather than the endothelium, thereby providing the force necessary to resist detachment under flow. We also note that adherent cells at the 10 min time point do not exhibit discernable protrusions, suggesting that early tumor-endothelial adhesion exists, but is likely mediated by other adhesion molecules such as selectins (CD62) or glycoproteins like CD4436, rather than integrins.
In vivo, we observed similar numbers of control and β1KD cells in lungs at early time points (3 and 16 h post-injection) and only a slight difference at 24 h (Fig. SI 4C). This lack of β1 dependence compared to in vitro findings could be due to a tendency for physical trapping to dominate over adherence in vivo, since narrow capillaries are not recapitulated in the in vitro flow channel. That is, while we find that β1 can mediate adhesion under flow due to subendothelial matrix anchorage, physical trapping of cells may be the rate-controlling factor in retention in vivo.
Activated β1 and actin-rich protrusion formation precede and are required for complete transmigration
Previously, it has been suggested that tumor cells form invadopodia-type processes past the endothelium37,38 and that abrogating these structures prevents extravasation in chick chorioallantoic membrane assays (CAM)38. Thus, we sought to understand the role of β1 in protrusion formation and endothelial barrier breaching. We employ an alternate “vertical monolayer device” consisting of microchannels connected by 3D ECM hydrogels, where tumor cells are seeded in one channel, arrest onto and extravasate across an endothelial monolayer into a fibrin-type 1 collagen matrix 34,39. In this assay, migration across and through the monolayer and subendothelial matrix occurs in the plane of view; thus, protrusion formation and dynamics during extravasation can be observed in high detail (Fig. SI 1B, SI 5A–C). Time-lapse confocal images taken over 6 h reveal that transmigrating control cells extend numerous thin filipodial-like protrusions past a gap in the endothelial barrier as early as 20 min post-perfusion (Fig. 2B). In contrast, β1KD cells remained largely spherical and lacked protrusions in nearly all cells sampled (Fig. 2C). Surprisingly, while β1KD tumor cells do not transmigrate, there is still discernable endothelial gap formation at the site of tumor arrest, suggesting that β1 does not significantly hinder the ability for endothelial disruption (Fig. SI 5D).
Immunostaining for the active conformation of β1 showed localized punctates at the tips of the protrusions extending into the sub-endothelial matrix in transmigrating control cells only (Fig. 2F), suggesting that β1 mediated protrusion formation and ECM engagement is required for complete TEM. Dynamic tracking of tumor cell protrusions embedded in 3D collagen 1-fibrin mixed matrices reveal that control cells quickly extend protrusions that often persist (>30 min), and subsequently take on an elongated morphology. In contrast, β1KD cells exhibit small, short-lived transient protrusions and typically retain a more spherical shape (Fig. SI 6A–B). Thus, it is likely that β1 is not required for protrusion initiation, but for protrusion stabilization via β1 mediated anchorage onto vascular BM; this is supported by previous findings but in a 2D context23. Furthermore, live time-lapse imaging of tumor F-actin during TEM reveals actin-rich punctates at the tips of protrusions extending past the endothelium (Fig. 2G). At times, these actin-rich protrusions are also diffusely marked by the focal adhesion protein vinculin (Fig. 2H), which is generally diffuse in tumor cells embedded in 3D collagen gels (data not shown). There has recently been growing evidence that integrins play important roles in invadopodia formation and function, in particular ανβ3 and β1 integrins; however, whether invadopodia form during extravasation is unclear. Indeed immunofluorescent imaging showed Tks5 punctates specifically in protrusions, suggesting the presence of functional and degradatory invadopodia during TEM. Together our results suggest that β1 mediates tumor cell protrusion stabilization by facilitating anchorage vascular BM, followed by recruitment of actin and possibly focal adhesion proteins, at the protruding-edge. Subsequent actomyosin-mediated contractions then likely pull the remaining cell body past the endothelium.
β1 integrins mediate invasion across the basement membrane
Upon closer inspection of fixed images in both microvascular network and monolayer assays, fully transmigrated cells were observed in 3 distinct “positions” relative to the endothelium: (1) directly adjacent to the abluminal surface, (2) adjacent but elongated perpendicular to the lumen, and (3) migrated away from the abluminal surface. At 4 h control cells were found in all three positions while of the few (<6%) β1KD cells that had transmigrated, almost all were exclusively confined to “position 1” (Fig. 3A). Not only were transmigration distances significantly reduced in knockdown cells, few protrusions were observed (Fig. 3B), consistent with their rounded and non-protrusive morphology.
Since β1KDs are unable to migrate away from the endothelium, we hypothesized that tumor cells were unable to invade past the endothelium BM. This could be due to the inability to attach to and/or degrade the underlying matrix proteins. During the formation of microvasculature, endothelial cells forming the in vitro microvessels deposit a continuous layer of BM proteins including collagen IV, laminin and fibronectin (Fig. SI 7A) similar to in vivo vasculature. Staining for laminin revealed tumor cells in four “states” relative to the BM and endothelium: (1) breaching the endothelium but not the BM, (2) fully transmigrated but intercalated between the endothelium and BM, (3) breaching the BM, and (4) completely cleared of endothelium and BM (Fig. 3C). Devices immunostained at 2 h revealed that out of the subpopulation of transendothelial migrating cells, both control and β1KD cells were mostly found in state (1) where the endothelium had been breached but not the laminin layer. Subsequently, devices fixed at 9 h showed that most transmigrating control cells were in states (3) and (4), breaching both the endothelium and laminin (Fig. 3D). This suggests that the formation of stable protrusions requires adhesive interactions with the underlying BM, which is then followed by degradation and invasion past it. Conversely, nearly all transmigrating β1KD cells remained in state (1). Similar results were found in the vertical monolayer assay when immunostained for collagen IV (SI Fig. 7 B–D).
Due to the inability of β1KD cells to invade past the BM, we hypothesized that MMPs are required to digest BM proteins, and that β1KD cells may exhibit a defect in MMP activity. We tested the effect of anti-MT1-MMP and anti-MMP-9 (two major MMPs implicated in BM/laminin degradation) on TEM efficiency in microvascular networks at 6 h. Both anti-MT1-MMP and anti-MMP-9 slightly reduce TEM efficiency (p=0.046 and p=0.089, respectively) (although not comparable to knocking down β1 integrins) suggesting that initial crossing of the EC barrier is only weakly dependent on these proteases (Fig. SI 7E). Further immunostaining for laminin on the same devices revealed that transmigrating cells treated with either anti-MT1-MMP anti-MMP-9 were both less likely to breach the laminin layer upon exiting the endothelium compared to control cells at the same time point (p=0.026 and p=0.008, respectively). Together this suggests that MT1-MMP and MMP-9 are involved in matrix degradation once the cell has transmigrated, while playing a smaller role in the initial crossing of the endothelium. However, when MMP secretion levels were tested via an MMP antibody array, no discernable differences were found between β1KD and control shRNA MDA-MB-231 in secreted levels of MMP-1, 2, 3, 8, 9, 10 and TIMP-1, 2, and 4. Further testing of MMP-9 and MMP-2 levels via zymography also revealed no differences (data not shown). Despite these results, we cannot completely rule out the possibility of β1KD-induced defects in MMP localization and/or activation in the specific context of TEM, since conventional conditioned medium collection techniques (cells mono-cultured on a 2-D culture dish) do not recapitulate the specific context of TEM and MMP localization.
Transendothelial migration is mediated by β3β1 and β6β1 integrins via interactions with sub-endothelial laminin
Our results suggest that TEM is facilitated by the formation of activated β1 and actin-rich protrusions, which then form stable adhesions onto the subendothelial matrix, and likely followed by contraction at the protruding edge. Because we demonstrated that tumor cell protrusions associate closely with the BM during the initial hours of TEM (Fig. 3C), we hypothesized that the defects induced by β1 depletion are partly due to the inability of protrusions to bind to specific underlying BM proteins. To determine which alpha subunits and corresponding ECM ligands are important for TEM, we first employed function blocking antibodies for integrins α 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, v, β1 and β4 to tumor cells prior to, and during the in vitro microvasculature assay. Reduction of integrin(s) function was verified via adhesion assays to collagen I, collagen IV, fibronection and laminin (SI Fig. 8A). At 6 h post tumor cell seeding, TEM rates for most individually blocked alpha subunits (α 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5) and β4 were not significantly different, while there were slight attenuations when α6 and αv were blocked, and when αv/α5 and α1/α2 were co-blocked (Fig. 4A). The most striking decrease occurred when laminin-binding integrins α3 and α6 were co-blocked (p=0.0059), indicating that adhesion to subendothelial laminin is critical for efficient TEM. This also suggests that sub-endothelial fibronectin and collagen-mediated adhesion through integrins αv/ α5 and α1/ α2, respectively may not be a major factor in TEM. We further tested endothelial permeability in the presence of each blocking antibody at 6 h and found that barrier function was not impaired in this time frame (data not shown). To further confirm our results, we silenced α3 and α6 via siRNA (Fig. 4B) and carried out longer-term (~24 h) kinetics experiments. This also determines whether the defect in TEM is due to a delay in extravasation. At 24 h post tumor seeding, co-silencing of α3 and α6 continues to yield a significantly lower TEM rate compared to silencing α3 or α6 alone, suggesting that the reduction of one laminin binding integrin may be compensated by the other (Fig. 4C). Furthermore, silencing of β4 integrin did not result in significant changes in TEM over 24 h, indicating that α6β1, and not α6β4 (which also bind to laminin), is likely at play (SI Fig. 8B).
Dynamic tracking of TEM on individual tumor cells revealed that the time required to reach a state of discernable stable protrusion formation past the endothelium was longer in α3/α6 co-knockdown cells compared to controls (SI Fig. 8C). Furthermore, blocking of microvascular devices with anti-laminin antibodies prior to tumor cell perfusion resulted in a significantly lower percentage of cells exhibiting protrusions at early time points of 1 and 4 h, strongly suggesting that the ability to adhere to BM laminin is important in the specific context of extravasation (Fig. 8D). However, while co-blocking α3 and α6 significantly decreases TEM efficiency, it does not reach the levels associated with blocking β1. Combined with the finding that blocking of most individual alpha subunits only yields small or insignificant changes, it is highly likely that multiple alpha subunits function simultaneously to facilitate TEM.
β1 integrin is required for metastatic colony formation in vivo
Our results show that loss of β1 integrins significantly impairs tumor cell extravasation by influencing multiple processes during extravasation, which is widely believed to be a rate-limiting step in metastatic colonization of distant organs. Therefore, we tested whether β1 knockdown impairs metastatic colonization. Since several cell types in the immune system are known to influence metastatic colonization40,41, we performed these experiments using the highly metastatic mouse mammary carcinoma cell line 4T1 which is syngeneic in Balb/C mice. These 4T1 β1KDs were confirmed to impair extravasation in our microvascular network assay (Fig. 1E).
To test the effect of knocking down individual integrin subunits, we utilized a previously developed a Luminex-based, multiplexed assay for metastatic colonization (Fig. 5A)28. 4T1 cells stably expressing uniquely DNA-barcoded vectors with shRNAs targeting each integrin subunit were individually generated and efficient knockdown of each integrin subunit was confirmed by flow cytometry (Supplementary Table 2). These cell lines were then mixed in equal numbers and utilized for multiplexed tail vein metastasis assays. Cell lines expressing shRNAs that inhibit metastatic colonization will be significantly depleted in lungs of these mice relative to control shRNAs. Cells expressing shRNAs targeting integrin β1 were significantly reduced in the lungs relative to control shRNAs (Fig. 5B), indicating the loss of β1 significantly impairs metastatic colonization. In contrast, targeting other beta subunits or individual alpha subunits did not significantly reduced in the lungs relative to control shRNAs, suggesting that the functions of individual alpha subunits are dispensable for metastatic colonization. This finding is consistent with the earlier results presented, showing that blocking of individual alphas and other beta subunits does not significantly impair TEM in in vitro microvasculature (Fig 1B, Fig. 4). Together these findings suggest that the ability to successfully extravasate is strongly correlated with the ability to form metastasis, and that β1 integrin is required for metastatic formation.
Discussion
Tumor cell extravasation is a key step during cancer metastasis, yet the precise mechanisms that regulate this process remain unclear. This is partly due to the difficulty of most in vivo assays in isolating the effect of different perturbations on discrete steps during extravasation. Furthermore, in vivo models are often hindered by relatively low spatio-temporal resolution of extravasation events and the tortuosity of in vivo vasculature presents challenges in scoring extravascular and intravascular cells, rendering the analysis subjective. To address this need, we have recently developed in vitro microvascular platforms capable of observing multiple steps of the extravasation cascade in high detail, where vessels largely lie in the same plane of view and distances between the cells and microscope objective is <300 microns. This assay also features increased physiological relevance in terms of geometry and barrier function than most in vitro platforms. Thus, despite the essential role that in vivo extravasation models play in recapitulating physiological conditions, the in vitro assays used in this study are more suitable for discerning the spatial organization of tumor-endothelial cell interactions. Using our assays, we are able to pinpoint the distinct roles of tumor β1 integrin in tumor-endothelial and tumor-BM interactions during extravasation. First, β1 integrin is activated at the tip of leading protrusions penetrating the endothelium, allowing adhesion to subendothelial ECM, in particular, BM laminin via α3β1 and α6β1 integrins. Engagement of these integrins with their ligand allows stabilization and growth of these protrusions, which is followed by recruitment of F-actin at the protruding edge. This then enables the cell to translocate by pulling itself past the gap formed in the endothelium (Fig. 6).
The lack of discernable tumor cell protrusions during transmigration in β1KD cells suggests that the extension of cytoplasmic projections is required for complete extravasation. Cells transmigrating in our microvascular networks exhibit invadopodial-like extensions into the sub endothelial matrix during transmigration. Furthermore, these protrusions are marked by co-localized punctate regions of F-actin, activated β1 integrin, vinculin and Tks5 at the tips of the protrusion. In contrast, these proteins are only weakly diffuse in the intravascular portion of transmigrating cells, as well as in non-transmigrating cells. In support of this, it has been shown that invadopodia formation is associated with β1 and β3 integrins 42, and that pharmacological inhibition of invadopodia maturation (Tks5) and function (Tks4) results in an abrogation of extravasation in CAM models and metastatic colony formation in vivo 38. During the initial stages of TEM (20 min to 1 h) tumor cells begin by extending small actin rich protrusions (~1–3 μm deep) into the extravascular space. Combined with the observation that these initial protrusions do not breach but rather associate closely with the subendothelial BM, we hypothesized that β1 integrins facilitate the engagement of these protrusions to specific underlying BM proteins via specific alpha integrin subunits. In support of this, in vivo studies have shown that tumor cells extend processes past the endothelium, contacting the basal lamina 43–45. The integrin profile of MDA-MB-231 has previously been characterized and shown to express a variety of alpha subunits (including α1 to α6 and v) 46, however whether all or only a specific subset of these are required in extravasation is unclear. Numerous studies have demonstrated the importance of various alpha integrins in the context of 3D invasion and contribution to metastatic formation10,14,17,21,22,26,47. However, while similar ECM components may be present in both the primary site and extravasation microenvironments, their spatial distributions and abundance may differ. Additionally, the necessity of engagement to specific ECM components may also differ depending on the context of migration. Using our assays, we find that co-knockdown of α3 and α6 integrins results in the most significant defect in TEM, indicating that adhesion to BM laminin is required in the context of TEM, and likely facilitates maintenance of tumor cell projections past the endothelium. In fact, it has been found that the ability to adhere onto vascular laminin may be involved in the extravasation step, which is suggested by the requirement of α3β1 for adhesion to exposed regions of pulmonary vascular LN-5 and subsequent metastatic foci formation in a mouse model 26. In support of this, our dynamic imaging reveals co-blocking α3 and α6 integrins results in a slower rate of protrusion formation into the subendothelial matrix. In an in vivo context, it may be advantageous for tumor cells to form stable anchorage into the matrix faster, in order to gain better chances of escaping the hostile intravascular environment. In contrast, blocking integrin receptors αvand α5 for fibronection do not yield significant results, despite the fact that fibronectin is present on the abluminal surface of the vessels. This further suggests that the inability to adhere to laminin cannot be fully compensated via adhesion to other available ECMs during extravasation.
The BM scaffold is a tight covalently cross-linked mesh formed by laminin and type IV collagen that is bridged by nidogens on which other components are bound. It seems highly unlikely that a cell could squeeze through pores on the order of 50 nm; however, tumor cells constantly migrate across basement membranes48. Thus, the process has long been thought to require local degradation of the BM with matrix metalloproteinases (especially MT- MMPs), which may be recruited via integrin engagement to the ECM. These proteases are well characterized in the context of invasion, but whether the same factors are involved in vascular BM invasion are largely unclear. Because we observe the inability of β1KDs to migrate away from the endothelium post-transmigration, we hypothesized that β1 mediates the localization and production of MMPs that are required to degrade the vascular BM. In support of this hypothesis, studies show that β1 is required for invadopodia formation and matrix degradation in both 2D and 3D ECM scenarios49,50,23. Indeed, immunostaining of laminin in our devices revealed that while control cells begin to breach the laminin layer within the first 6 to 9 h of TEM, few transmigrating β1KD cells were able to invade the laminin layer, remaining trapped between the endothelium and BM. Furthermore, blocking of MMP-9 and MT1-MMP pheno-copied this behavior, suggesting that localization and activation of MMPs are involved in BM breaching.
In vivo metastasis assays show a clear role of β1 in dissemination 7,10,17,18,20,25,26 (Fig. 5); however, whether and how the defects lie in extravasation or even post-extravasation micro-metastatic growth remained unclear . In this report, we demonstrate that the tumor β1 subunit is an indispensible player in the tumor cell extravasation cascade, and that its depletion contributes to an overall decrease in formation of metastases in vivo. Using high-resolution in vitro assays, we find that tumor cells first send activated β1-rich protrusions past the endothelium, which engages with subendothelial matrix, in particular laminin, via α3β1 and α6β1 integrins. This is followed by protrusion stabilization, F-actin recruitment, translocation of the tumor cell into the parenchyma, and subsequently, β1-mediated invasion past the vascular basement membrane.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the NCI grant (U01: 1U01CA202177-01; to RDK) and the National Science Foundation (NSF GRFP: to MBC).
Footnotes
Author’s contributions
Conception and design: MBC, JML, ROH, RDK Acquisition of data: MBC, JML, RL
Writing, review and revision of manuscript: MBC, JML, ROH, RDK
The authors disclose no potential conflicts of interest.
References
- 1.Heyder C, et al. Realtime visualization of tumor cell/endothelial cell interactions during transmigration across the endothelial barrier. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2002;128:533–8. doi: 10.1007/s00432-002-0377-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Haier J. An Intravital Model to Monitor Steps of Metastatic Tumor Cell Adhesion Within the Hepatic Microcirculation. J Gastrointest Surg. 2003;7:507–515. doi: 10.1016/S1091-255X(03)00023-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ganguly KK, Pal S, Moulik S, Chatterjee A. Integrins and metastasis. 2013:251–261. doi: 10.4161/cam.23840. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hynes RO. Integrins: Bidirectional , Allosteric Signaling Machines In their roles as major adhesion receptors , integrins. 2002;110:673–687. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00971-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Orini MM, et al. THE α3 β1 INTEGRIN IS ASSOCIATED WITH MAMMARY CARCINOMA CELL METASTASIS , INVASION , AND GELATINASE B ( MMP-9 ) ACTIVITY. 2000;342:336–342. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Trikha M, De Clerck YA, Markland FS. Metastatic a Snake Venom Disintegrin. Inhibits 1J @ Cell Adhesion and Blocks Experimental Human Melanoma. 1994:4993–4998. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Grzesiak JJ, et al. Knockdown of the β(1) integrin subunit reduces primary tumor growth and inhibits pancreatic cancer metastasis. Int J Cancer. 2011;129:2905–15. doi: 10.1002/ijc.25942. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lahlou H, Muller WJ. B1-Integrins Signaling and Mammary Tumor Progression in Transgenic Mouse Models: Implications for Human Breast Cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2011;13:229. doi: 10.1186/bcr2905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Huck L, Pontier SM, Zuo DM, Muller W. J beta1-integrin is dispensable for the induction of ErbB2 mammary tumors but plays a critical role in the metastatic phase of tumor progression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:15559–64. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1003034107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Mitra aK, et al. Ligand-independent activation of c-Met by fibronectin and α(5)β(1)-integrin regulates ovarian cancer invasion and metastasis. Oncogene. 2011;30:1566–76. doi: 10.1038/onc.2010.532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.White DE, et al. Targeted disruption of β1-integrin in a transgenic mouse model of human breast cancer reveals an essential role in mammary tumor induction. 2004;6:159–170. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2004.06.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Weaver VM, et al. Reversion of the Malignant Phenotype of Human Breast Cells in Three-Dimensional Culture and In Vivo by Integrin Blocking Antibodies. 1997;137:231–245. doi: 10.1083/jcb.137.1.231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Liu Y, et al. Cleaved high-molecular-weight kininogen and its domain 5 inhibit migration and invasion of human prostate cancer cells through the epidermal growth factor receptor pathway. Oncogene. 2009;28:2756–65. doi: 10.1038/onc.2009.132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Yoshimura K, et al. Integrin alpha2 mediates selective metastasis to the liver. Cancer Res. 2009;69:7320–8. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-0315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ramirez NE, et al. The α 2 β 1 integrin is a metastasis suppressor in mouse models and human cancer. 2011:121. doi: 10.1172/JCI42328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Brakebusch C, et al. b 1 integrin promotes but is not essential for metastasis of ras-myc transformed ® broblasts. 1999;1:3852–3861. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1202770. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Zhou B, et al. Integrin α3β1 can function to promote spontaneous metastasis and lung colonization of invasive breast carcinoma. Mol Cancer Res. 2014;12:143–54. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-13-0184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Qian F, Zhang ZC, Wu XF, Li YP, Xu Q. Interaction between integrin alpha(5) and fibronectin is required for metastasis of B16F10 melanoma cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005;333:1269–75. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.06.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Felding-habermann B. Integrin adhesion receptors in tumor metastasis. 2003:203–213. doi: 10.1023/a:1022983000355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Reticker-Flynn NE, et al. A combinatorial extracellular matrix platform identifies cell-extracellular matrix interactions that correlate with metastasis. Nat Commun. 2012;3:1122. doi: 10.1038/ncomms2128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Desgrosellier JS, Cheresh Da. Integrins in cancer: biological implications and therapeutic opportunities. Nat Rev Cancer. 2010;10:9–22. doi: 10.1038/nrc2748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ahmed N, Riley C, Rice G, Quinn M. Role of integrin receptors for fibronectin, collagen and laminin in the regulation of ovarian carcinoma functions in response to a matrix microenvironment. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2005;22:391–402. doi: 10.1007/s10585-005-1262-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Beaty BT, et al. β1 integrin regulates Arg to promote invadopodial maturation and matrix degradation. Mol Biol Cell. 2013;24:1661–75. S1–11. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E12-12-0908. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Shibue T, Weinberg RA. Integrin β1 -focal adhesion kinase signaling directs the proliferation of metastatic cancer cells. 2009:106. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0904227106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Wang D, et al. The pivotal role of integrin β1 in metastasis of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18:4589–99. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-3127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Wang H, et al. Tumor cell alpha3beta1 integrin and vascular laminin-5 mediate pulmonary arrest and metastasis. J Cell Biol. 2004;164:935–41. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200309112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Stoletov K, et al. Visualizing extravasation dynamics of metastatic tumor cells. J Cell Sci. 2010;123:2332–41. doi: 10.1242/jcs.069443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Lamar JM, et al. The Hippo pathway target, YAP, promotes metastasis through its TEAD-interaction domain. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2012;109:E2441–E2450. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1212021109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Stern P, et al. A system for Cre-regulated RNA interference in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:13895–900. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0806907105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Labelle M, Begum S, Hynes RO. Platelets guide the formation of early metastatic niches. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111:E3053–61. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1411082111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Chen MB, Whisler JA, Jeon JS, Kamm RD. Mechanisms of tumor cell extravasation in an in vitro microvascular network platform. Integr Biol. 2013;5:1262–1271. doi: 10.1039/c3ib40149a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Shin Y, et al. Microfluidic assay for simultaneous culture of multiple cell types on surfaces or within hydrogels. Nat Protoc. 2012;7:1247–59. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2012.051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Whisler Ja, Chen MB, Kamm RD. Control of perfusable microvascular network morphology using a multiculture microfluidic system. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2014;20:543–52. doi: 10.1089/ten.tec.2013.0370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Zervantonakis IK, et al. Three-dimensional microfluidic model for tumor cell intravasation and endothelial barrier function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:13515–20. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1210182109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Labelle M, Begum S, Hynes RO. Direct signaling between platelets and cancer cells induces an epithelial-mesenchymal-like transition and promotes metastasis. Cancer Cell. 2011;20:576–90. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2011.09.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Reymond N, D’Água BB, Ridley AJ. Crossing the endothelial barrier during metastasis. Nat Rev Cancer. 2013;13:858–70. doi: 10.1038/nrc3628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Chen MB, Whisler Ja, Jeon JS, Kamm RD. Mechanisms of tumor cell extravasation in an in vitro microvascular network platform. Integr Biol (Camb) 2013;5:1262–71. doi: 10.1039/c3ib40149a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Leong HS, et al. Invadopodia are required for cancer cell extravasation and are a therapeutic target for metastasis. Cell Rep. 2014;8:1558–70. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.07.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Jeon JS, Zervantonakis IK, Chung S, Kamm RD, Charest JL. In vitro model of tumor cell extravasation. PLoS One. 2013;8:e56910. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Gorelik E, Wiltrout RH, Okumura K, Habu S, Herberman RB. Role of NK cells in the control of metastatic spread and growth of tumor cells in mice. Int J Cancer. 1982;30:107–112. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910300118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Labelle M, Hynes RO. The initial hours of metastasis: the importance of cooperative host-tumor cell interactions during hematogenous dissemination. Cancer Discov. 2012;2:1091–9. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-12-0329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Destaing O, et al. β1A Integrin Is a Master Regulator of Invadosome Organization and Function. 2010;21:4108–4119. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E10-07-0580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Stoletov K, Montel V, Lester RD, Gonias SL, Klemke R. High-resolution imaging of the dynamic tumor cell vascular interface in transparent zebrafish. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:17406–11. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0703446104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Weis S, Cui J, Barnes L, Cheresh D. Endothelial barrier disruption by VEGF-mediated Src activity potentiates tumor cell extravasation and metastasis. J Cell Biol. 2004;167:223–9. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200408130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Kienast Y, et al. Real-time imaging reveals the single steps of brain metastasis formation. Nat Med. 2010;16:116–22. doi: 10.1038/nm.2072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Haidari M, et al. Integrin α2β1 mediates tyrosine phosphorylation of vascular endothelial cadherin induced by invasive breast cancer cells. J Biol Chem. 2012;287:32981–92. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.395905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Maschler S, et al. Tumor cell invasiveness correlates with changes in integrin expression and localization. Oncogene. 2005;24:2032–41. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1208423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Yurchenco PD. Basement membranes: Cell scaffoldings and signaling platforms. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2011;3:1–27. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a004911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Mueller SC, et al. A Novel Protease-docking Function of Integrin at Invadopodia. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:24947–24952. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.35.24947. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Sameni M, Dosescu J, Yamada KM, Sloane BF. Functional live-cell imaging demonstrates that beta(1)-integrin promotes type IV collagen degradation by breast and prostate cancer cells. 2009;7:199–213. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.