Skip to main content
PMC home page
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1992 Apr 15;89(8):3300–3304. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.8.3300

Biochemical analysis of UV mutagenesis in Escherichia coli by using a cell-free reaction coupled to a bioassay: identification of a DNA repair-dependent, replication-independent pathway.

O Cohen-Fix 1, Z Livneh 1
PMCID: PMC48854  PMID: 1314385

Abstract

Incubation of UV-irradiated plasmid DNA with a protein extract prepared from Escherichia coli cells led to the production of mutations in the cro gene residing on the plasmid. The mutations were detected in a subsequent bioassay step, which involved transformation of an indicator strain with the plasmid DNA that was retrieved from the reaction mixture, followed by plating on lactose/MacConkey plates. UV mutations produced in this cell-free reaction required the recA and umuC gene products and were prevented by rifampicin, an inhibitor of RNA polymerase, which inhibited plasmid replication. Removal of pyrimidine photodimers from the plasmid by enzymatic photoreactivation after the in vitro stage, but prior to transformation, increased plasmid survival as expected. Surprisingly, it also caused a large increase in the frequency of UV mutations detected in the bioassay. This photoreactivation-stimulated in vitro UV mutagenesis was dependent on the excision repair genes uvrA, uvrB, and uvrC and occurred in the absence of DNA replication. This suggests that two distinct UV mutagenesis pathways occurred in vitro: a replication-dependent pathway (type I) and a repair-dependent pathway (type II). DNA sequence analysis of type II UV mutations revealed a spectrum similar to that of in vivo UV mutagenesis. When the photoreactivation step was included in the protocol, type II UV mutagenesis did not require the RecA and UmuC proteins. These results are in agreement with the in vivo delayed photoreactivation phenomenon, where the removal of photodimers after an incubation period eliminated the requirement for RecA and UmuC in UV mutagenesis. The above system will enable the biochemical analysis of UV mutagenesis and the isolation of proteins involved in the process.

Full text

PDF
3300

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bradford M. M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976 May 7;72:248–254. doi: 10.1006/abio.1976.9999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bridges B. A., Mottershead R. P. Mutagenic DNA repair in Escherichia coli. III. Requirement for a function of DNA polymerase III in ultraviolet-light mutagenesis. Mol Gen Genet. 1976 Feb 27;144(1):53–58. doi: 10.1007/BF00277304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bridges B. A. Recent advances in basic mutation research. Mutat Res. 1977 Aug;44(2):149–164. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(77)90073-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bridges B. A., Woodgate R. The two-step model of bacterial UV mutagenesis. Mutat Res. 1985 Jun-Jul;150(1-2):133–139. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(85)90110-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bridges B. DNA polymerase and mutation. Nature. 1978 Oct 19;275(5681):591–592. doi: 10.1038/275591b0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Brotcorne-Lannoye A., Maenhaut-Michel G., Radman M. Involvement of DNA polymerase III in UV-induced mutagenesis of bacteriophage lambda. Mol Gen Genet. 1985;199(1):64–69. doi: 10.1007/BF00327511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bryan S. K., Hagensee M., Moses R. E. Holoenzyme DNA polymerase III fixes mutations. Mutat Res. 1990 Apr;243(4):313–318. doi: 10.1016/0165-7992(90)90149-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Christensen J. R., LeClerc J. E., Tata P. V., Christensen R. B., Lawrence C. W. UmuC function is not essential for the production of all targeted lacI mutations induced by ultraviolet light. J Mol Biol. 1988 Oct 5;203(3):635–641. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(88)90198-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Echols H., Goodman M. F. Mutation induced by DNA damage: a many protein affair. Mutat Res. 1990 Sep-Nov;236(2-3):301–311. doi: 10.1016/0921-8777(90)90013-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Elledge S. J., Walker G. C. Proteins required for ultraviolet light and chemical mutagenesis. Identification of the products of the umuC locus of Escherichia coli. J Mol Biol. 1983 Feb 25;164(2):175–192. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(83)90074-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Fuller R. S., Kaguni J. M., Kornberg A. Enzymatic replication of the origin of the Escherichia coli chromosome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Dec;78(12):7370–7374. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.12.7370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hagensee M. E., Timme T. L., Bryan S. K., Moses R. E. DNA polymerase III of Escherichia coli is required for UV and ethyl methanesulfonate mutagenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Jun;84(12):4195–4199. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.12.4195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. James A. P., Kilbey B. J., Prefontaine G. J. The timing of UV mutagenesis in yeast: continuing mutation in an excision-defective (rad1-1) strain. Mol Gen Genet. 1978 Oct 4;165(2):207–212. doi: 10.1007/BF00269908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. James A. P., Kilbey B. J. The timing of UV mutagenesis in yeast: a pedigree analysis of induced recessive mutation. Genetics. 1977 Oct;87(2):237–248. doi: 10.1093/genetics/87.2.237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kato T., Nakano E. Effects of the umuC36 mutation on ultraviolet-radiation-induced base-change and frameshift mutations in Escherichia coli. Mutat Res. 1981 Oct;83(3):307–319. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(81)90014-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kato T., Shinoura Y. Isolation and characterization of mutants of Escherichia coli deficient in induction of mutations by ultraviolet light. Mol Gen Genet. 1977 Nov 14;156(2):121–131. doi: 10.1007/BF00283484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kilbey B. J., Brychcy T., Nasim A. Initiation of UV mutagenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature. 1978 Aug 31;274(5674):888–891. doi: 10.1038/274889a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kornberg A. DNA replication. J Biol Chem. 1988 Jan 5;263(1):1–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lam L. H., Reynolds R. J. DNA sequence dependence of closely opposed cyclobutyl pyrimidine dimers induced by UV radiation. Mutat Res. 1987 Jun;178(2):167–176. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(87)90266-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Livneh Z. Mechanism of replication of ultraviolet-irradiated single-stranded DNA by DNA polymerase III holoenzyme of Escherichia coli. Implications for SOS mutagenesis. J Biol Chem. 1986 Jul 15;261(20):9526–9533. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Livneh Z. Replication of UV-irradiated single-stranded DNA by DNA polymerase III holoenzyme of Escherichia coli: evidence for bypass of pyrimidine photodimers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Jul;83(13):4599–4603. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.13.4599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Masai H., Bond M. W., Arai K. Cloning of the Escherichia coli gene for primosomal protein i: the relationship to dnaT, essential for chromosomal DNA replication. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Mar;83(5):1256–1260. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.5.1256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Meyer B. J., Maurer R., Ptashne M. Gene regulation at the right operator (OR) of bacteriophage lambda. II. OR1, OR2, and OR3: their roles in mediating the effects of repressor and cro. J Mol Biol. 1980 May 15;139(2):163–194. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(80)90303-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Mieschendahl M., Büchel D., Bocklage H., Müller-Hill B. Mutations in the lacY gene of Escherichia coli define functional organization of lactose permease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Dec;78(12):7652–7656. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.12.7652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Miura A., Tomizawa J. I. Studies on radiation-sensitive mutants of E. coli. 3. Participation of the rec system in induction of mutation by ultraviolet irradiation. Mol Gen Genet. 1968;103(1):1–10. doi: 10.1007/BF00271151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Nishioka H., Doudney C. O. Different modes of loss of photoreversibility of mutation and lethal damage in ultraviolet-light resistant and sensitive bacteria. Mutat Res. 1969 Sep-Oct;8(2):215–228. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(69)90001-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Nishioka H., Doudney C. O. Different modes of loss of photoreversibility of ultraviolet light-induced true and suppressor mutations to tryptophan independence in an auxotrophic strain of Escherichia coli. Mutat Res. 1970 Apr;9(4):349–358. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(70)90017-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Pakula A. A., Young V. B., Sauer R. T. Bacteriophage lambda cro mutations: effects on activity and intracellular degradation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Dec;83(23):8829–8833. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.23.8829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Sancar A., Smith F. W., Sancar G. B. Purification of Escherichia coli DNA photolyase. J Biol Chem. 1984 May 10;259(9):6028–6032. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Sargentini N. J., Smith K. C. Ionizing and ultraviolet radiation-induced reversion of sequenced frameshift mutations in Escherichia coli: a new role for umuDC suggested by delayed photoreactivation. Mutat Res. 1987 Jul;179(1):55–63. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(87)90041-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Sargentini N. J., Smith K. C. Much of spontaneous mutagenesis in Escherichia coli is due to error-prone DNA repair: implications for spontaneous carcinogenesis. Carcinogenesis. 1981;2(9):863–872. doi: 10.1093/carcin/2.9.863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Sedgwick S. G. Misrepair of overlapping daughter strand gaps as a possible mechanism for UV induced mutagenesis in UVR strains of Escherichia coli: a general model for induced mutagenesis by misrepair (SOS repair) of closely spaced DNA lesions. Mutat Res. 1976 Dec;41(2-3):185–200. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(76)90091-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Shwartz H., Shavitt O., Livneh Z. The role of exonucleolytic processing and polymerase-DNA association in bypass of lesions during replication in vitro. Significance for SOS-targeted mutagenesis. J Biol Chem. 1988 Dec 5;263(34):18277–18285. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Strike P., Humphreys G. O., Roberts R. J. Nature of transforming deoxyribonucleic acid in calcium-treated Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1979 Jun;138(3):1033–1035. doi: 10.1128/jb.138.3.1033-1035.1979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Tessman I. UV-induced mutagenesis of phage S13 can occur in the absence of the RecA and UmuC proteins of Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Oct;82(19):6614–6618. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.19.6614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Walker G. C. Mutagenesis and inducible responses to deoxyribonucleic acid damage in Escherichia coli. Microbiol Rev. 1984 Mar;48(1):60–93. doi: 10.1128/mr.48.1.60-93.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Witkin E. M. The mutability toward ultraviolet light of recombination-deficient strains of Escherichia coli. Mutat Res. 1969 Jul-Aug;8(1):9–14. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(69)90135-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Witkin E. M. Ultraviolet mutagenesis and inducible DNA repair in Escherichia coli. Bacteriol Rev. 1976 Dec;40(4):869–907. doi: 10.1128/br.40.4.869-907.1976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES