Skip to main content
Journal of the Royal Society Interface logoLink to Journal of the Royal Society Interface
. 2016 May;13(118):20151077. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2015.1077

Emergent patterns from probabilistic generalizations of lateral activation and inhibition

Lisa Willis 1,, Alexandre Kabla 2
PMCID: PMC4892256  PMID: 27170648

Abstract

The combination of laterally activating and inhibiting feedbacks is well known to spontaneously generate spatial organization. It was introduced by Gierer and Meinhardt as an extension of Turing's great insight that two reacting and diffusing chemicals can spontaneously drive spatial morphogenesis per se. In this study, we develop an accessible nonlinear and discrete probabilistic model to study simple generalizations of lateral activation and inhibition. By doing so, we identify a range of modes of morphogenesis beyond the familiar Turing-type modes; notably, beyond stripes, hexagonal nets, pores and labyrinths, we identify labyrinthine highways, Kagome lattices, gyrating labyrinths and multi-colour travelling waves and spirals. The results are discussed within the context of Turing's original motivating interest: the mechanisms which underpin the morphogenesis of living organisms.

Keywords: lateral inhibition, pattern formation, nonlinear stochastic model

1. Introduction

As a complex multicellular organism grows and develops, each one of its cells follows the same set of genomically encoded instructions, yet different cells beget drastically different fates so bringing about the organism's complex structure. Turing was among the first to present a powerful idea pertaining to this phenomenon, when he realized that a spatially homogeneous soup of just two chemically reacting species can spontaneously morph into a structured pattern owing to nothing more than the diffusion of these species, so long as the reaction kinetics are of the appropriate activatory or inhibitory nature and the diffusivities are sufficiently different [1]. Later Gierer and Meinhardt extended this notion to show how processes other than reaction–diffusion can potentially drive pattern formation: they demonstrated that any process which feeds back on itself over two lateral ranges—one short range that quickens or activates the process, the other long range that competitively slows or inhibits it—can spontaneously generate structural organization [2,3]. This combination of feedbacks has come to be known as short-range activation and long-range inhibition and is widely accepted as the key criteria for Turing-type patterning [35].

Groups of cells can effect lateral activation/inhibition by, for example, secreting ligands that diffuse on average a few cell lengths before degradation or binding to receptors; this binding triggers an intra-cellular signalling cascade which in turn increases/decreases the ligand's expression. Given the vast number of intra- and inter-cellular signals operating within and between cells, it seems probable that other types of lateral feedback beside lateral activation and inhibition also operate during development; furthermore, the structural diversity among living organisms is immense, whereas lateral activation and inhibition alone generate a limited range of patterns. What other types of lateral feedback may be operating to bring about the development of a multicellular organism? What patterns can be generated by recombinations of these feedbacks and what feedbacks are necessary and sufficient to generate a particular pattern?

Here, we study a model of interacting lattice sites that laterally activate and inhibit one another [6]. The lattice sites may be considered as a layer of immobile discrete cells, each executing a dynamic differentiation program to transit between Boolean states according to a common set of deterministic instructions but subject to some level of noise. The model has an important distinguishing feature: its discrete and probabilistic formulation makes it straightforward to introduce and to simulate additional pattern-generating modules—additional classes of lateral feedback operating alongside lateral activation and inhibition—in a systematic way: the discreteness allows us to write down simple equations governing the bifurcation diagrams, while the noise provides an in-built test of robustness against fluctuations and renders the long-term patterning dynamics independent of the model's initial state. For lateral activation and inhibition only, the model's final states of morphogenesis are either striped, hexagonally netted, labyrinthine, spotted or uniform block colour, patterns that are ubiquitous in nature and are well known to be generated by Turing-type models [6]; the additional feedback modules that we introduce generate a surprisingly extended range of static and dynamic patterning modes. The ubiquity in nature of the patterning modes generated by the original model—stripes, hexagons, labyrinths, spots—(see e.g. [7,8]; reaction–diffusion [1,911]; directional solidification [12]; granular/fluid flows [13], hydrodynamic instabilities, animal furs, seashells and more [7,14,15]) suggest that concrete applications for these novel patterning modes may soon be discovered.

2. Model and methods

2.1. Model

The core model of discrete and probabilistic lateral activation and inhibition introduced in [6] is now described. In each section of the results, this core model is generalized in a different way.

The model runs on a two-dimensional square grid of lattice sites that are either black (B) or white (W). From an initial configuration, lattice sites flip their colour, from black to white or white to black, one at a time. The rate at which a particular site flips its colour is determined by the following three rules:

  • (i) a site can flip to a colour only if a neighbouring site has that colour (this is activation at the interface);

  • (ii) the likelihood of flipping to a colour decreases with the density of sites of that colour within a particular long range rL (i.e. long-range inhibition), where Inline graphic is measured in units of a lattice site diameter;

  • (iii) the likelihood of flipping to a colour increases with the density of sites of that colour within a particular short range rS (i.e. short-range activation).

A noise level TL is associated with the long-range inhibition: as TL increases, the long-range inhibition is wiped out. Similarly, a noise level TS is associated with the short-range activation. A parameter, β, determines the strength of the propensity for cells to flip to a particular colour, either black or white, independently of the lateral activation and inhibition. When β = 0, this propensity is zero, then colour configurations converge to attractors that are 50% white and 50% black on average over multiple instances of the simulation; in this case, we say there is colour symmetry and the model's specification is unchanged when white is interchanged with black (see the reaction kinetics (2.1) below). Perturbing β away from zero, then rather colour configurations accumulate an excess of one particular colour—white is more abundant for β > 0, while black is more abundant for β < 0—and so β is called a symmetry breaking parameter (figure 1a). To interpret the rules (i)–(iii) in the context of cellular dynamics, each lattice site would represent a cell that can be in one of a number of discrete states. Its ability to change from a state A to a different state B would be dependent on contact with another cell of that particular state. The rate at which the transition A → B happens would be regulated by two ligands produced by B cells, one activator of the transition that is degraded within an average length rL (long-range inhibition of type A), and one inhibitor of the transition that is degraded within a length rS (short-range activation of type A).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

A probabilistic and discrete model of lateral activation and inhibition. (a) The model has three key rules: (i) activation at the interface; (ii) long-range inhibition and (iii) short-range activation. (b) Sketch bifurcation diagram for colour symmetry (β = 0): for lateral inhibition only (Inline graphic), dynamics converge to stationary stripes; for short-range activation and long-range inhibition together (Inline graphic), stripes bifurcate to stationary labyrinths; weakening the long-range inhibition (Inline graphic), eventually labyrinths bifurcate to bistable attractors. (c) For colour symmetry breaking (β ≠ 0), stripes transit to hexagonal nets while labyrinths transit to irregular arrangements of pores; these transitions are represented by plots of fb, the summary statistic for two-colour symmetry breaking transitions (upper plot is for lateral inhibition only; lower plot is for short-range activation and long-range inhibition together). The correspondence between patterns and fb is colour coded by red/orange/green. Simulation parameters and numbers of instances are listed in table 1. (Online version in colour.)

Precisely, from a given colour configuration, the probability that the next colour flip is at site x to colour C = W or B is non-zero if and only if any of the eight neighbours of x has colour C (the set of neighbouring colours is denoted Inline graphic); this probability has one of two possible forms depending on the colour Cx of site x

2.1. 2.1

where Inline graphic is the fraction of white minus black sites within range rJ around x, and Z is the colour configuration-dependent normalizing factor, or equivalently the sum of numerators in (2.1) over every non-zero probability colour flip. This completely specifies the model's reaction kinetics, except for initial and boundary conditions which are described in the next section. For the corresponding continuous time definition and a partial derivation of the mean-field equations (see the electronic supplementary material).

When the model is run, invariably it converges to a macroscopically stationary attractor that is either patterned, or homogeneously noisy, or uniform block colour (figure 1b,c; electronic supplementary material, Movies S1 and S2, [6]). Patterned attractors are time-invariant or stationary if and only if sites along their interfaces flip from black to white and back again from white to black at equal rates, so from (2.1) we have the following necessary and sufficient mean-field approximation for stationary attractors,

2.1. 2.2

For lateral inhibition only and no symmetry break (high noise on the short range TS = ∞, low noise of the long range Inline graphic and β = 0), from (2.2) stationary attractors have Inline graphic along interfaces (because Inline graphic), whereas for both lateral activation and inhibition with no symmetry break (Inline graphic and β = 0) then we have Inline graphic along interfaces. Straight interfaces satisfy the condition Inline graphic, whereas Inline graphic can be satisfied by curved interfaces. Moreover, the mean-field approximation predicts a linear increase of Inline graphic with β for lateral inhibition only (TS = ∞ in (2.2)).

2.2. Methods

Each model was simulated on a two-dimensional square grid of (l + 2rL) × (l + 2rL) sites. Initially, all sites of the simulation are equally and independently likely to be one colour among a list of permitted colours (black or white in the model above; the list is extended in the generalizations below). Thereafter, sites within the central square domain of l × l lattice sites flip their colour according to the reaction kinetics specified in each section. Outside of this l × l domain, colours remain fixed for all time—this constitutes the boundary condition.

Simulations of the core model show that the local solutions predicted by the mean-field approximation (2.2) are invariably realized: for colour symmetry and lateral inhibition only (Inline graphic, β = 0), attractors are approximately straight stripes, whereas curved labyrinths are generated by lateral activation and inhibition together (Inline graphic, β = 0, figure 1b; electronic supplementary material, Movies S1 and S2, [6]). Now breaking the colour symmetry by increasing β > 0 then stripes bifurcate to white hexagonal nets while the predicted linear increase of Inline graphic with β holds true for the overall fraction of white sites in the l × l domain, as shown in the plots in figure 1c which are fully described below; the relatively disordered labyrinths bifurcate to relatively disordered pores. The initial and boundary conditions appear to have no effect on the local structure of the final pattern so long as simulations are run until colour configurations have converged to an attractor [6]. Near to the boundary, stripes and labyrinths tend to align perpendicularly to the boundary and in this way the domain's geometry influences patterns' orientations (see the electronic supplementary material). The wavelength of stripes, and of labyrinths when Inline graphic is 4rL/3 (see the electronic supplementary material) [6]; increasing the domain size l × l appears to have no effect on this wavelength. In all simulations, the domain size was set such that the wavenumber Inline graphic.

We have seen, then, that in this model the combination of the three rules (i) activation at the interface, (ii) short-range activation, and (iii) long-range inhibition generates a range of Turing-type patterns—stripes, labyrinths, hexagonal nets and spots—and, moreover, that in several cases the correspondence between stationary patterning modes and parameter values, i.e. the bifurcation diagrams, can be roughly anticipated simply by inspecting the mean-field approximation (2.2). Therefore, we searched for interesting new attractors by retaining the three rules (i)–(iii) while systematically generalizing the model in different simple ways. Importantly, all generalizations in this study introduce new linearly independent terms into the mean-field approximation for stationary interfaces: we hypothesized that only such generalizations can produce attractors with interesting new patterns (see the electronic supplementary material). We consider each linearly independent term in the mean-field approximation to be a lateral feedback module. Each lateral feedback module has a corresponding free parameter.

In order to quantitatively represent transitions between patterning modes, a representative summary statistic was computed from each instance of the simulation and its variation with the corresponding parameter was plotted. White/black colour symmetry breaking transitions, where β is varied from zero, are quantitatively represented by the variation in fb which represents the fractional excess in white over black sites in the l × l domain, as shown in the plots in figure 1c. In order to generate these plots, the simulation was run five times for each value of β with all other parameters held constant. The cross-hairs are fb computed for each instance of the simulation; the line-graph connects the averages of fb for different values of β. A similar format is followed for every plot in the article (see table 2). Table 1 lists the corresponding parameter values and the number of repeated instances of the simulation. Other summary statistics are introduced in Results; the corresponding and complete descriptions can be found in the electronic supplementary material. These summary statistics do not depend on the domain size or the end time of the simulation.

Table 2.

Definitions of summary statistics.

fb the fractional excess of white over black lattice sites
fS a measure of the prevalence of short-range spots within the labyrinth pattern
fL a measure of the average speed of movement of the interface
N the total number of spiral foci in the l × l domain

Table 1.

Parameters for panels and plots in figures. The ‘end time’ is the number of transitions per simulation. n is the number of instances simulated for generating statistics. ‘t’, ‘m’, ‘b’, ‘p’ stand for ‘top row’, ‘middle row’, ‘bottom row’, ‘panel’, respectively, in the corresponding figure or plot. ‘V’ stands for ‘varying’ in the corresponding figure or plot.

figure l β Inline graphic Inline graphic end time N
1(c) t 140 V (4, 0, –, –, –) (12, 16, –, –, –) 3 × 106 5
1(c) b 140 V (4, 16, –, –, –) (12, 16, –, –, –) 3 × 106 5
2(b) t black/blue 140/210 0 (4/6, 16, 0, V, –) (12/18, 16, –, –, –) 2 × 106 5
2(b) b 140 0 (V, 16, 0, 2, –) (12, 16, –, –, –) 2 × 106 5
2(c) t black/blue 140 V (4/6, 16, 0, 2,–) (12, 16, –, –, –) 2 × 106 2
2(c) b black/blue 140 0 (4/6, 16, V, 2,–) (12, 16, –, –, –) 2 × 106 2
3(a) t black/blue 140 0 (4/6, 16, 0, 0,–) (12, 16, 0, V, –) 5 × 106 5
3(a) t green 210 0 (9, 16, 0, 0, –) (18, 16, 0, V, –) 5 × 106 5
3(b) b 140 0 (V, 16, 0, 0, –) (12, 16, 0, 2, –) 5 × 106 5
3(c) t 140 V (6, 16, 0, 0, –) (12, 16, 0, 2, –) 5 × 106 2
3(c) b 140 0 (6, 16, 0, 0, –) (12, 16, V, 2, –) 5 × 106 2
4(a) 140 (4, 0/16/16, –, –, 0) (12, 16/0/16, –, –, –) 3 × 106
4(b) 140 (4/6, 16, –, 2/0, –) (12, 16, –, 0/3.4, –) 3 × 106
5 140 (4, 0/16/16, –, –, 0/1/0) (12, 16/0/16, –, –, 1/0/2) 3 × 106
5 p t/b 210 (V/6, 16, –, –, 1) (–, –, –, –, –) 3 × 106 2

3. Results

In all sections, for a clear portrayal of the model's dynamics it is essential to view the corresponding movies. Parameters for each movie are listed in the electronic supplementary material.

3.1. Labyrinthine highways, train tracks and Kagome lattices from a competing nonlinear inhibition on the short range

A natural extension of the model, which introduces two new lateral feedback modules while retaining rules (i)–(iii), includes in the exponent symmetry breaking nonlinear terms Inline graphic associated with the short range, and symmetry preserving nonlinear inhibitory terms Inline graphic which compete with the short-range activation. Increasing βS enhances the white colour flipping rate wherever there is an imbalance of colour on the short range; increasing Inline graphic increases the strength of an inhibitory response that depends on the colour imbalance on the short range. Within a cellular tissue, βS 0 could correspond to a scenario where a local imbalance of cellular states drives cells to a particular state, while σS 0 would imply that a local imbalance promotes a negative feedback loop. All other notation is left unchanged. The reaction kinetics are

3.1.
3.1.

where Z is the colour configuration-dependent normalizing factor. We focus on perturbations to labyrinth attractors: in all simulations Inline graphic. Electronic supplementary material, Movies S3–S5 and figure 2 portray the dynamics.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Labyrinthine highways and Kagome lattices for competing nonlinear inhibition on the short range. In all simulations, TS = TL = 1/16; other parameters are in table 1. (a) A nonlinear inhibitory lateral feedback that competes with the activatory feedback on the short range generates labyrinthine highways (i) and Kagome lattices (ii). (b) Colour symmetry. Increasing Inline graphic causes labyrinths to bifurcate to labyrinthine highways as represented by the sudden increase in fS (the black curve superposed on the blue curve is for l, rL and rS rescaled by a factor of 1.5 while other parameters are held constant). The bifurcation occurs only when rS/rL < 1/2 (lower plot). (c) Colour symmetry break. In all plots, σS = 2. Increasing β causes labyrinthine highways to bifurcate smoothly to Kagome lattices for rS/rL = 1/2 (upper blue plot) or interwoven short- and long-scale hexagonal nets for rS/rL = 1/3 (upper black plot). Increasing βS causes labyrinthine highways to bifurcate to train tracks (lower plots; blue (black) curve is for rS/rL = 1/2 (1/3)). (Online version in colour.)

For colour symmetry (Inline graphic), as depicted in figure 2b and electronic supplementary material, Movie S3, increasing Inline graphic causes labyrinths to suddenly bifurcate to near-stationary labyrinthine highways so long as Inline graphic. The summary statistic representing this bifurcation in the plots of figure 2b, denoted by fS, measures the prevalence of the short-range spots within the labyrinth tracks (see electronic supplementary material for details). Values of fS appear to be unaltered when l, rL and rS are simultaneously rescaled while other parameters are held constant, indicating that discretization effects of the lattice are small (compare the blue and black curves which are superposed in the upper plot of figure 2b). At least for Inline graphic, labyrinthine highways persist when boundary conditions are perturbed (see electronic supplementary material).

The bifurcation point Inline graphic can be qualitatively explained as follows. So long as Inline graphic, the net short-range feedback is always activatory for all sites since Inline graphic is bounded above by 1—there is no possibility that the short-range feedback switches to inhibitory. When Inline graphic, the net short-range feedback switches sign to become inhibitory for any configuration such that Inline graphic, then qualitatively new dynamics are possible.

When colour symmetry is broken by perturbing β ≠ 0, for rS/rL = 1/2 labyrinthine highways transit to Kagome lattices—a pattern of intermeshed regular hexagons and triangles where the diameter of the hexagon is twice the side of the triangle—that are best known to feature in the atomic arrangement of the minerals Herbertsmithite and jarosite, see e.g. [16,17]. Whereas for rS/rL = 1/3, labyrinthine highways transit to interwoven short and long-scale hexagonal nets (for rS/rL = 1/3) as depicted in figure 2c; electronic supplementary material, Movies S4 and S5. When the short-range symmetry breaking term is perturbed βS≠0, labyrinthine highways transit to train tracks. As both β and βS are varied, the transitions between patterns are apparently gradual and smooth, as demonstrated by the plots of figure 2c which show gradual and smooth increases of fb (the blue curve is for rS/rL = 1/2; the black curve is for rS/rL = 1/3).

3.2. Gyrating labyrinths from a competing nonlinear activation on the long range

A second natural extension of the model, analogous to the extension of §3.1, includes in the exponent symmetry breaking nonlinear terms Inline graphic associated with the long range, and symmetry preserving nonlinear activatory terms Inline graphic which compete with the long-range inhibition. Analogous to the previous section, increasing βL enhances the black colour flipping rate wherever there is an imbalance of colour on the long range; increasing Inline graphic increases the strength of an activatory response that depends on the colour imbalance on the long range. All other notation is left unchanged. The reaction kinetics are

3.2.

and

3.2.

where Z is the colour configuration-dependent normalizing factor. Again, we focus on perturbations to labyrinths: in all simulations Inline graphic. Electronic supplementary material, Movie S6 and figure 3 portray the dynamics.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Dynamic gyrating labyrinths for competing nonlinear activation on the long range. In all simulations, TS = TL = 1/16; other parameters are in table 1. (a) Colour symmetry. Labyrinths bifurcate to continually gyrating labyrinths as Inline graphic increases beyond a threshold greater than 1 as represented by the increase in fL (black plot is for rS/rL = 1/3; blue and green plots are for rS/rL = 1/2; in the green plot, l, rL and rS have been rescaled by a factor of 1.5 compared with the blue plot). (b) Colour symmetry break. In all plots, σL = 2. As either β or βL increases, gyrating labyrinths bifurcate to uniform block colour attractors. (Online version in colour.)

For colour symmetry (Inline graphic), as depicted in figure 3a and electronic supplementary material, Movie S6, stationary labyrinths bifurcate to continually gyrating labyrinths as Inline graphic increases beyond approximately 1.5 (Inline graphic) or 2.0 (Inline graphic). This is quantitatively represented in the plots of figure 3a by the summary statistic fL which represents the time-averaged speed of movement of the interface (see electronic supplementary material for details). fL appears to be unaltered when all length-scales are simultaneously rescaled while other parameters are held constant (compare the blue and green curves in the plot of figure 3a), indicating that the structure of the bifurcation diagram is unaffected by discretization effects of the lattice. The dependency of the bifurcation point on rS/rL may be due to more varied interface geometries that are got by increasing rS/rL, since some variations may be more likely to creep into unstable configurations that must then gyrate to new configurations that are locally stable. For σL = 2, the value of rS/rL must exceed a threshold of approximately 1/3 in order for this bifurcation to occur (not shown). An argument precisely analogous to that in the previous section explains why the bifurcation point for Inline graphic must be greater than 1. In the electronic supplementary material, we demonstrate that gyrating labyrinths persist upon perturbations to the boundary condition.

When colour symmetry is broken by perturbing β ≠ 0, gyrating labyrinths first freeze to be stationary labyrinths. They then bifurcate discontinuously to uniform block colour attractors once the magnitude of β exceeds a threshold as depicted in the upper plot of figure 3b (σL = 2 and rS/rL = 1/2). The bifurcation is similar when perturbing βL ≠ 0 but appears to be continuous.

3.3. Multi-colour hexagonal lattices and labyrinths from multi-colour lateral activation and inhibition

The two-colour models in the previous sections are extended to an arbitrary number of colours denoted by Inline graphic. All symmetry breaking terms are omitted in this section. The reaction kinetics can then be described by a single expression:

3.3.

where

3.3.

gives short-range activation and long-range inhibition, and Inline graphic is the density of colour Ci within range rJ. We simulated three and four colours with activation at the interface and (i) long-range inhibition only; (ii) short-range activation only; (iii) both long-range inhibition and short-range activation; and (iv) symmetry preserving nonlinear terms that compete with the short-range activation (Inline graphic) or the long-range inhibition (Inline graphic). The dynamics are portrayed in figure 4.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Patterning modes for multi-colour lateral activation and inhibition. (a) For no lateral feedbacks (TS = TL = ∞), attractors are homogeneous. For lateral inhibition only (Inline graphic), attractors are a stationary multi-colour lattice, whereas for lateral activation only (Inline graphic), attractors are multi-stable uniform block colour. Short-range activation and long-range inhibition together (Inline graphic) generate multi-colour labyrinths. (b) Increasing the nonlinear short-range inhibition Inline graphic produces multi-colour labyrinthine highways (rS/rL = 1/3). Increasing the nonlinear long-range activation Inline graphic produces gyrating labyrinths for four colours but for three colours attractors appear to remain stationary (rS/rL = 1/2). (Online version in colour.)

As depicted in figure 4a, lateral inhibition only (Inline graphic) generates stationary hexagonal lattices. Lateral activation only (Inline graphic) generates multi-stable block colour attractors where finally each site has the same colour and all of the permitted colours are equally likely. Short-range activation and long-range inhibition together (Inline graphic) generate multi-colour labyrinths. These attractors are analogous to two colour stripes, bistable uniform blocks and labyrinths depicted in figure 1.

When multi-colour labyrinths are perturbed by increasing the short-range symmetry preserving nonlinear competition Inline graphic, multi-colour labyrinths bifurcate to patterning modes that are analogous to labyrinthine highways for three and four colours (figure 4b). However, increasing the long-range symmetry preserving nonlinear competition Inline graphic causes only four-colour labyrinths to bifurcate to gyrating four-colour labyrinths, whereas three-colour labyrinths bifurcate to attractors that appear not to gyrate.

3.4. Travelling stripes and spirals and reorganizing labyrinths from cyclic symmetry breaking

When the model is extended to more than two colours, a new mode of symmetry breaking is possible which, unlike in §3.1 and 3.2, does not enforce an accumulation of one particular colour. As in §3.3, because there are no symmetry breaking parameters that are associated with particular colours, the reaction kinetics can be described by a single expression:

3.4.

where again

3.4.

enforces short-range activation and long-range inhibition, and where Inline graphic is the jth element of the vector

3.4.

for three or four colours, respectively, and M can be defined similarly for n colours. The circulancy of M drives the dynamics in a symmetry breaking cyclic colour ordering Inline graphic for Inline graphic. Colours can no longer be arbitrarily exchanged for one another without changing the model's specification, yet there is no a priori propensity for one particular colour to accumulate. Reversing the sign of γS (or γL) drives the cycle in the opposite direction on the short (or long) range. This circulancy condition could correspond to a scenario where cells transit between states as partly governed by a non-transitive rock–paper–scissors-like dynamic; for example, high local density of state C1 enhances the likelihood of state C2 possibly via the diffusivity of some C1-produced species, similarly high local density of state C2 enhances the likelihood of state C3 and high local density of state C3 enhances the likelihood of state C1. A similar mode of symmetry breaking has been called cyclic dominance and studied in a spatial and probabilistic context within [18].

For lateral inhibition only (Inline graphic), cyclic symmetry breaking with Inline graphic causes stationary multi-colour lattices to bifurcate to travelling stripes (three colours) or travelling lattices (four colours) (figure 5; electronic supplementary material, Movie S7). For lateral activation only (Inline graphic), cyclic symmetry breaking with Inline graphic causes multi-stable uniform block attractors to bifurcate to cyclic spiralling attractors (figure 5; electronic supplementary material, Movie S8). Strikingly, the focal points of the spirals appear to be stuck rigidly in one place and rarely wander within the domain. Simulations indicate that the number of spiral foci at the end of the simulation N varies linearly with Inline graphic (figure 5 inset panel, top plot); N appears to be unaffected by the simulation's initial condition (figure 5 inset panel, middle and bottom plots).

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Travelling stripes, multi-colour swirls and reorganising labyrinths from cyclic symmetry breaking. For lateral inhibition only (Inline graphic), increasing Inline graphic causes stationary multi-colour lattices to transit to travelling stripes/lattices (three colours/four colours); whereas for lateral activation only (Inline graphic), increasing Inline graphic causes multi-stable blocks to transit to cyclic spirals. For both lateral activation and inhibition (Inline graphic), increasing either Inline graphic or Inline graphic causes stationary multi-colour labyrinths to transit to dynamic, continually reorganizing attractors. Panel: For cyclic spirals (Inline graphic), the total number of spiral foci in the domain N varies linearly with Inline graphic (top plot); changing the initial conditions to hexagonal/diamond lattices then varying the diameter of initial hexagons/diamonds (middle/bottom plot) appears to have little effect on N compared with the default initial condition (dashed line). (Online version in colour.)

For short-range activation and long-range inhibition together (Inline graphic), cyclic symmetry breaking on the short or long range (Inline graphic or Inline graphic) causes multi-colour labyrinths to continually reorganize (see electronic supplementary material, Movies S9 and S10). These multi-colour reorganizing labyrinths appear sensitive to perturbations to the boundary condition, unlike the cyclic spiralling attractors (see the electronic supplementary material).

4. Discussion

The models we have presented are simple generalizations of the well-known pattern-producing dynamics of lateral activation and inhibition. Yet, despite their simplicity, to our surprise they have produced a broad range of dynamics and attractors including labyrinthine highways, Kagome lattices, gyrating labyrinths and corresponding multi-species analogies. In some cases, to the best of our knowledge, the models constitute novel phenomenological mechanisms for generating such patterning modes. We anticipate that these attractors are robust to changes in details of the model such as the square geometry of the lattice or the precise formulation of the reaction kinetics and rather that they depend on the class of interactions implemented by the model. Whether the geometry of the square lattice impacts upon results could be better established by adapting our code, which is available on request and uses plugins from the software Processing [19], to run on hexagonal or Voronoi grids or by completing the derivation of the mean-field equations (see the electronic supplementary material) and simulating the resulting system of PDEs. We further anticipate that for each class of interactions all qualitatively distinct attractors were identified: a simple mean-field equation governing the model's output allowed us to search for new patterns systematically. The ease of implementation of simulations, the ease of interpretation of bifurcation diagrams, and the capacity for systematically exploring parameter space are strengths of this approach compared with continuum deterministic reaction–diffusion systems, which can be coupled to produce patterning modes similar to labyrinthine highways, gyrating labyrinths and cycle swirls as elegantly shown in [20,21] (table 2).

Since we believe that the model outputs do not depend on details of the implementation, we explore and speculate about the likely applicability of the models to biology. Firstly, our study indicates that such complex patterns—beyond stripes, labyrinths and hexagonal nets—such as labyrinthine highways or Kagome lattices may be generated by a collection of cells with the following properties: (i) a master regulator that once expressed initiates the expression of two diffusing ligands and a membrane-junction signal; (ii) receiving the membrane-junction signal from a neighbouring cell is an absolute requirement for the expression of the master regulator; (iii) the first ligand diffuses in excess of a few cell lengths on average before being degraded; or it binds to cell-surface receptors to trigger a signal that decreases the likelihood of expression of the master regulator; (iv) the second diffusing ligand, which tends to be degraded within a range that is short compared with the range of the first diffusing ligand, upon binding to a receptor either increases or decreases the likelihood of expression of the master regulator depending on whether the number of bound receptors is below or above a threshold. However, it must be recognized that our model is only an abstract representation of (i)–(iv); in particular, it represents only cases where the time-scales of diffusion, degradation and membrane-junction signalling are much faster than the time-scale of the master regulator's response to such signals. There are other possible long-range signalling mechanisms besides diffusion, operating over lengths which span multiple cells, that can account for lateral feedbacks: in animals, these include the active migration of cells, e.g. [22], and the dynamic protrusions of filopodia, e.g. [23,24].

Secondly, our toy model motivates us to speculate about a possible dynamical feature of some developmental programs. In the model, when parameters enforce what we have called colour symmetry (β = 0)—a prerequisite for e.g. stripes and labyrinths—that region of parameter space is comparatively rich in the diversity of final patterns that are generated; consequently, the final pattern responds sensitively and flexibly to sustained changes in parameter values. The broad range of natural patterns suggests that this might be evolutionarily advantageous. While genetic drift would tend to take the system away from colour symmetry, we expect evolution to act as a tuning force which maintains the sensitivity and flexibility of developmental programs.1

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Material
rsif20151077supp1.pdf (9.8MB, pdf)

Acknowledgements

This work began under the supervision of Tom Duke at the London Centre for Nanotechnology and CoMPLEX, University College London. Tom Duke is deeply missed. We thank David Wright for running a number of simulations and for stimulating discussions, Michael Cohen for introducing us to discrete models of lateral inhibition, and Pau Formosa-Jordan for a critique of the manuscript.

Endnote

1

We describe a dynamical system tuned to its critical point. A self-tuned critical system is known to operate in the inner ear where it affords tremendous sensitivity of response to vibrations of minute amplitude [25], but, as far as we are aware, no specific system is thought to operate in this manner owing to the action of evolution on the genome.

Data accessibility

The datasets and mathematical derivations supporting this article have been uploaded as part of the electronic supplementary material and all movies can be found at https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/253075.

Authors' contributions

L.W. conceived of the study, carried out the model analysis and wrote the manuscript; A.K. guided the model analysis and the writing of the manuscript. All authors gave final approval for publication.

Competing interests

We have no competing interests.

Funding

This work began while L.W. was supported by an EPSRC fellowship.

References

  • 1.Turing A. 1953. The chemical basis for morphogenesis. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 237, 37–42. ( 10.1098/rstb.1952.0012) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Meinhardt H, Gierer A. 1974. Applications of a theory of biological pattern formation based on lateral inhibition. J. Cell Sci. 15, 321–346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Meinhardt H. 1982. Models of biological pattern formation. London, UK: Academic Press. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kondo S, Miura T. 2010. Reaction-diffusion model as a framework for understanding biological pattern formation. Science 329, 1616–1620. ( 10.1126/science.1179047) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wolpert L, Tickle C. 2011. The Principles of Development, 4th edn Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Willis L, Cox EJ, Duke T. 2013. A simple probabilistic model of submicroscopic diatom morphogenesis. J. R. Soc. Interface 10, 20130067 ( 10.1098/rsif.2013.0067) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ball P. 1999. The self-made tapestry. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Murray JD. 1989. Mathematical biology 1: an introduction. Berlin, Germany: Springer. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lee KJ, McCormick WD, Ouyang Q, Swinney HL. 1993. Pattern formation by interacting chemical fronts. Science 261, 192–194. ( 10.1126/science.261.5118.192) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Vanag VK, Epstein IR. 2001. Pattern formation in a tunable medium: the Belousov-Zhabotinsky reaction in an aerosol OT microemulsion. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 673–681. ( 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.228301) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bánsági T, Vanag VK, Epstein IR. 2011. Tomography of reaction-diffusion microemulsions reveals three-dimensional Turing patterns. Science 331, 1309–1312. ( 10.1126/science.1200815) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Langer JS. 1980. Instabilities and pattern formation in crystal growth. Rev. Modern Phys. 52, 1–27. ( 10.1103/RevModPhys.52.1) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Sandnes B, Knudsen HA, Måløy KJ, Flekkøy EG. 2007. Labyrinth patterns in confined granular-fluid systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 038001 ( 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.038001) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Vanag VK, Epstein IR. 2009. Pattern formation mechanisms in reaction-diffusion systems. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 53, 228301 ( 10.1387/ijdb.072484vv) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Cross M, Greenside H. 2009. Pattern formation and dynamics in nonequilibrium systems. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wills AS, Harrison A, Ritter C, Smith RI. 2000. Magnetic properties of pure and diamagnetically doped jarosites: model Kagome antiferromagnets with variable coverage of the magnetic lattice. Phys. Rev. B 61, 6156 ( 10.1103/PhysRevB.61.6156) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Han TH, Helton JS, Chu S, Nocera DG, Rodriguez-Rivera JA, Broholm C, Lee YS. 2012. Fractionalized excitations in the spin-liquid state of a kagome-lattice antiferromagnet. Nature 492, 406–410. ( 10.1038/nature11659) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Reichenbach T, Mobilia M, Frey E. 2007. Mobility promotes and jeopardizes biodiversity in rock-paper-scissors games. Nature 448, 1046–1049. ( 10.1038/nature06095) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Fry B, Reas C. 2001. Processing. See https://processing.org.
  • 20.Yang L, Epstein IR. 2003. Oscillatory turing patterns in reaction-diffusion systems with two coupled layers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 178308 ( 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.178303) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Epstein IR, Berenstein IB, Dolnik M, Vanag VK, Yang L, Zhabotinsky AM. 2008. Coupled and forced patterns in reaction-diffusion systems. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 366, 397–408. ( 10.1098/rsta.2007.2097) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Inaba M, Yamanaka H, Kondo S. 2012. Pigment pattern formation by contact-dependent depolarization. Science 335, 677 ( 10.1126/science.1212821) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Cohen M, Georgiou M, Stevenson NL, Miodownik M, Baum B. 2010. Dynamic filopodia drive pattern refinement via intermittent N-Dl signalling. Dev. Cell 19, 78–89. ( 10.1016/j.devcel.2010.06.006) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Cohen M, Baum B, Miodownik M. 2011. The importance of structured noise in the generation of self-organizing tissue patterns through contact-mediated cell-cell signalling. J. R. Soc. Interface 8, 787–798. ( 10.1098/rsif.2010.0488) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Camalet S, Duke T, Jülicher F, Prost J. 2000. Auditory sensitivity provided by self-tuned critical oscillations of hair cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 3183–3188. ( 10.1073/pnas.97.7.3183) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Material
rsif20151077supp1.pdf (9.8MB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

The datasets and mathematical derivations supporting this article have been uploaded as part of the electronic supplementary material and all movies can be found at https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/253075.


Articles from Journal of the Royal Society Interface are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES