Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Aug 4.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroscience. 2016 Apr 27;329:30–42. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.04.033

Inhibition of Cerebral Vascular Inflammation by Brain Endothelium-Targeted Oligodeoxynucleotide Complex

Jing Hu 1, Daniah Al-Waili 1, Aishlin Hassan 3, Guo-Chang Fan 2, Mei Xin 3, Jiukuan Hao 1,*
PMCID: PMC4905813  NIHMSID: NIHMS782319  PMID: 27132231

Abstract

The present study generated a novel DNA complex to specifically target endothelial NF-κB to inhibit cerebral vascular inflammation. This DNA complex (GS24-NFκB) contains a DNA decoy which inhibits NF-κB activity, and a DNA aptamer (GS-24), a ligand of transferrin receptor (TfR), which allows for targeted delivery of the DNA decoy into cells. The results indicate that GS24-NFκB was successfully delivered into a murine brain-derived endothelial cell line, bEND5, and inhibited inflammatory responses induced by tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) or oxygen-glucose deprivation/re-oxygenation (OGD/R) via down-regulation of the nuclear NF-κB subunit, p65, as well as its downstream inflammatory cytokines, inter-cellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) and vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM-1). The inhibitory effect of the GS24-NFκB was demonstrated by a significant reduction in TNF-α or OGD/R induced monocyte adhesion to the bEND5 cells after GS24-NFκB treatment. Intravenous (i.v.) injection of GS24-‘NFκB (15mg/kg) was able to inhibit the levels of phoseph-p65 and VCAM-1 in brain endothelial cells in a mouse lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced inflammatory model in vivo. In conclusion, our approach using DNA nanotechnology for DNA decoy delivery could potentially be utilized for inhibition of inflammation in ischemic stroke and other neuro-inflammatory diseases affecting cerebral vasculature.

Keywords: NF-κB, inflammation, oxygen-glucose deprivation, lipopolysaccharide, aptamer, endothelial cells

Introduction

Neuro-inflammation has been implicated in various brain diseases, e.g. stroke, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson’s disease, and Alzheimer’s disease. Vascular inflammation plays an important role in neurodegenerative diseases by triggering the release of cytokines and inflammatory mediators, such as CD14 LPS receptor (Lacroix et al., 1998), interleukin-1 (Quan et al., 1998b), TNF (Barone et al., 1997, Nadeau and Rivest, 1999, Yang et al., 1999), cyclooxygenase-2 (Quan et al., 1998a), inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) (Wong et al., 1996), the adhesion molecules like ICAM-1 and VCAM-1(Lindsberg et al., 1996, Henninger et al., 1997, Stanimirovic et al., 1997) etc. Up-regulation of above the substances damages the barrier function of the Blood-brain Barrier (BBB) (de Vries et al., 1996a, de Vries et al., 1996b), and facilitates adhesion and trans-endothelial migration of leukocytes into the brain (Nakajima and Kohsaka, 2001, Yilmaz and Granger, 2008). In response to these inflammatory signals, macrophages, microglia and other immune cells are activated and accumulate throughout the CNS. This process has been implicated in the development of neuronal injury and death (Aloisi, 2001, Nakajima and Kohsaka, 2001). Importantly, up-regulation of inflammatory mediators is closely associated with the activation of transcription factor NF-κB, which is a master switch of inflammatory gene expression (Baldwin, 2001, Keifer et al., 2001). In mammals, the NF-κB family has five proteins: NF-κB1 (p50), NF-κB2 (p52), RelA (p65), RelB, and c-Rel (Gilmore, 2006). NF-κB is a protein complex made up by various combinations of homo- or heterodimers of the five proteins listed above. Normally, NF-κB is in an inactive state, in which NF-κB dimers are associated with IκB proteins in the cytosol (Jacobs and Harrison, 1998, Schwaninger et al., 2006). Activation of NF-κB, by removing IκB, does not require new protein synthesis, which allows NF-κB to act as a “first responder” to many cellular stimuli. When cells are perturbed, NF-κB is rapidly activated causing the up-regulation of inflammatory gene expression. The key steps in the NF-κB activation are the disassociation of IκB proteins from NF-κB dimers, and the translocation of free NF-κB into the nucleus (Fig. 1), where NF-κB can regulate gene expression by interacting with binding sites in the promoter regions of multiple inflammatory genes. Notably, activation of NF-κB has been seen in the BBB endothelial cells under inflammatory conditions (Kooij et al.,, Pan et al.,, Quan et al., 1997, Laflamme et al., 1999). Based on the central role of NF-κB in inflammatory responses, we hypothesize that the inhibition of NF-κB activity in cerebral endothelial cells will have suppressive effects on cerebral vascular inflammation, because it targets multiple inflammatory signals instead of single inflammatory molecules. Therefore, cerebral endothelial transcription factor NF-κB could be a novel therapeutic target for neuro-inflammatory diseases such as ischemic stroke, multiple sclerosis, and Parkinson’s disease..

Figure 1.

Figure 1

NF-κB activation and the mechanism of GS24-NFκB inhibition on NF-κB activity.

The concept of NF-κB inhibition is supported by evidence from a number of studies examining generalized NF-κB suppression. First, glucocorticoids are the most effective drugs for neuro-inflammatory diseases, like multiple sclerosis, and for immune suppression due to their actions in NF-κB inhibition (Ray and Prefontaine, 1994, Auphan et al., 1995). Second, NF-κB inhibition reduces infarct size in ischemic stroke (Huang et al., 2003, Wang et al., 2008) and the incidence of relapses in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) (Vanderlugt et al., 2000). Third, inhibition of NF-κB activity in the heart and lung prevents expression of pro-inflammatory genes after LPS challenge (Liu et al., 1999a, Liu et al., 1999b). While NF-κB is a very attractive drug target, there is some controversy about the outcomes of therapeutic approaches targeting the NF-κB pathway in neuro-inflamatory diseases. For instance, some reports showed that NF-κB activation was neuroprotective, and inhibition of NF-κB increased neuronal death in ischemic stroke models (Beg and Baltimore, 1996, Hill et al., 2001, Duckworth et al., 2006). However, other studies indicated that the activation of NF-κB contributed to neuronal damage after ischemic stroke, as inhibition of NF-κB activity improved the outcomes of ischemic stroke in animal models (Xu et al., 2002, Shen et al., 2003, Nurmi et al., 2004, Zhang et al., 2005). This apparent dual effect of NF-κB on ischemic stroke is due to the ability of NF-κB to activate both a pro-inflammatory and an anti-apoptotic pathway. Activation of NF-κB upregulates the anti-apoptotic regulators, such as BcL-2, TRAF-1, and XIAP, which limit infarct size in ischemic stroke. At the same time, the NF-κB-dependent up-regulation of inflammatory mediators, including iNOS, COX-2, ICAM-1, VCAM-1, IL-6, and MMP-9, contributes to ischemic tissue damage. Thus, the ultimate fate of neurons implicated in these diseases may depend on which NF-κB pathway is activated, as well as where and when it is activated (Nijboer et al., 2008).

NF-κB decoy is a short double-stranded DNA oligodeoxynucleotide (ODN), which consists of NF-κB decoy-1 (5′-CCTTGAAGGGATTTCCCTCC-3′) and NF-κB decoy-2 (3′-GGAACTTCCCTAAAGG GAGG-5′) (Morishita et al., 1997). NF-κB decoy inhibits NF-κB activity by binding to its “cis”- binding sequence (6-10bp), preventing the cis-trans interaction between NF-κB and the promoter region of the target gene (Morishita et al., 1998). It has been shown that the NF-κB decoy was effective in modulating gene expression under experimental conditions (Bielinska et al., 1990, Morishita et al., 1997, Tomita et al., 2000, Tomita et al., 2001, Matsuda et al., 2004). The effectiveness of these decoy ODNs against the expression of genes involved in inflammatory responses in brain endothelial cells has also been demonstrated by a number of experiments in vitro (Xu et al., 1997, Tomita et al., 1998, Hess et al., 2000). However, the effectiveness of NF-κB decoy in vivo is dependent on overcoming drug delivery problems at the BBB. Most of the current approaches used for brain delivery of macromolecular drugs are invasive, like intra-cerebral injection, and can cause brain tissue damage and possible infection. Therefore, the development of non-invasive systemic delivery systems is critical to eventually achieve clinical applications for the DNA decoy approach. In the present study, we constructed a novel DNA complex for brain-targeted delivery of NF-κB decoy with the goal of inhibiting cerebral vascular inflammation. We used a DNA aptamer (GS-24, a ligand of TfR) as a vector to deliver NF-κB decoy into brain endothelial cells. The GS24 DNA aptamer (Fig. 2A) can specifically bind to the extracellular domain of mouse TfR (TfR-ECD) for cellular uptake. The TfR, a membrane glycoprotein, is involved in receptor-mediated uptake of transferrin-bound iron. TfR has become a well-known target for brain drug delivery due to the high expression of TfR on the BBB (Qian et al., 2002). GS24 aptamer interacts with TfR at a different binding site from that of transferrin (Chen et al., 2008), consequently avoiding competition with transferrin for the binding site. This limits potential side-effects of GS24 on the normal functions of TfR and reduces the challenges of drug delivery. GS24 has been successfully used to deliver a lysosomal enzyme into deficient cells to correct defective glycosaminoglycan degradation in the cells (Chen et al., 2008). In the present study, we have evaluated delivery of GS24-NFκB in vitro and in vivo, and investigated the anti-inflammatory effect of GS24-NFκB under TNF-α induced inflammatory conditions, OGD/R condition in vitro, and inflammation induced by LPS in mouse in vivo.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

A. Design and predicted structure of GS24-NFκB complex by M-fold. B. Formation of GS24-NFκB complex: the ODNs were electrophoresed in 8% native-PAGE gel: NF-κB-decoy-1 strand (lane 1), NF-κB-decoy-2 strand (Strand-2 in lane 2), NF-κB decoy (lane 3), GS24-NFκB-decoy-1 (Strand-1 in lane 4), GS24-NFκB complex (lane 5). C. Quantitative analysis of cellular uptake of GS24-NFκB in bEND5 cells. Competition assay was performed by adding 20 times additional cold GS24-NFkB (unlabeled) into the media containing hot GS24-NFkB (labeled with 32P). n=6~8, Mean±SD, ** indicates p<0.05. D. The cellular uptake of GS24-NFkB by bEND5 cells Vs TfR-silenced bEND5 cells. Mean±SD, n=3, p<0.05.

Methods and Materials

Cell culture

The brain endothelial cell line (bEND5) derived from mouse brain and immortalized with polyoma middle T oncogene was a gift from Dr. Ulrich Bickel, Texas Tech University. bEND5 cells were grown in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) (Hyclone, Logan, UT, USA) supplemented with 10% (v/v) heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum(FBS) (Atlanta Bio InC. GA, USA), 1% (v/v) non-essential amino acids and 1% (v/v) 10000IU/ml penicillin/ 10000μg/ml streptomycin (all from ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA). U937 cells (a monocyte cell line from ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA) were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium (Hyclone, Logan, UT, USA) supplemented with 2 mM L-glutamine (Mediatech Inc. Cellgro, Manassas, VA, USA), 10% heat-inactivated FBS and 1% (v/v) 10000IU/ml penicillin/ 10000μg/ml streptomycin. Both cell lines were maintained at 37 °C, 5% CO2 and 95% relative humidity.

Animals

All animal procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at University of Cincinnati and they complied with pertinent NIH guidelines for care and use of animals. CD1 male mice (body weight ~25g) supplied by Charles River (Wilmington, MA, USA) were kept under standardized light/dark (12 hours), temperature (22°C), and humidity (70%) conditions, with free access to water and standard pelleted food.

Preparation of GS24-NFκB complex

The GS24-NFκB consists of GS24-NFκB-decoy-1 and NF-κB decoy-2 strands. The sequence of GS24-NFκB-decoy-1 strand (Strand-1): 5′- GCG TGT GCA CAC GGT CAC TTA GTA TCG CTA CGT TCT TTG GTT CCG TTC GGC CTTGAA GGGATT TCC CTC C -3′. The sequence of NF-κB decoy-2 strand (stand-2): 5′- GGAGGGAAATCCCTTCAAGG-3′. The sequence of scramble GS24-NFκB: Scramble GS24-NFκB -decoy-1 strand: 5′- AAG AGA GTA AAT CCT GGG ATC ATT CAG TAG TAA CCA CAA ACT TAC GCT GGC CTT GAA GGG ATT TCC CTC C-3′. Scramble NF-κB decoy-2 strand: 5′- GGAGGGAAATCCCTTCAAGG-3′. The sequences of NFκB-decoy are: the NFκB-decoy-1 strand: 5′-CCT TGAAGGGATTTCCCTCC-3′, and the NF-κB decoy-2 strand: 5′- GGAGGGAAATCCCTTCAAGG-3′. The designed sequences of the ODN strands listed above were purchased from Integrated DNA Technologies Inc (Coralville, Iowa, USA). The ODN complex was constructed by DNA denaturation and annealing processes. Briefly, the mixture of two complementary strands (mole ratio 1:1) was incubated at 95°C for 5 min, and then cooled at the room temperature for 45-60 min. The ODN complexes were analyzed by 8% native-PAGE gel.

Cellular uptake of GS24-NFκB by bEND5 cells

Quantitative cellular uptake of 32P-labeled ODNs: GS24-NFκB and its scramble control ODNs were 5′-end labeled with [γ-32P] ATP (PerkinElmer Inc.,Waltham, Massachusetts, USA) using T4 Polynucleotide Kinase (Fermentas, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and then purified by NucAway spin column (life technology, Grand Island,NY). The purity of the product was controlled by precipitation of the ODNs with trichloroacetic acid (TCA) (Sigma-Aldrich Co.LLC., St. Louis, MO, USA), and only the batches with precipitation rates >95% were used. Briefly, ice-cold 10% TCA (500μl) was added to a 1μl mixture of sample and 50μl 2.5% bovine serum albumin (BSA, Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA, USA). The resulting mixture was then vortexed and incubated on ice for 10 min following by centrifugation at 4000g for 5 min. The supernatant was collected and the pellet was dissolved in 3% KOH. The radioactivity of the TCA-precipitated fraction was calculated as % (precipitable fraction) = (cpmpellet × 100)/ (cpmpellet +cpmsupernatant). The TfR negative bEND5 cells were generated by transfecting CD71 siRNA with lipofectamine RNAiMAX (Life Technology, Grand Island, NY) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly, TfR negative and normal bEnd5 cells at 80% confluence were incubated with 32P-labeled ODNs at the concentration of 1μmol/l (~0.4 μCi) for 40 minutes at 37 °C. After washing the cells three times with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), the cells were lysed with RIPA buffer (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA), and the cell-associated radioactivity was counted by a LSC 6500-multiplepurpose scintillation counter (Beckman Counter, Fullerton, CA). The competition assay for cellular uptake was performed as follows: 20-fold extra unlabeled GS24-NFκB was added to the medium 30 min before adding 32P-labeled ODNs.

Serum stability of GS24-NFκB

GS24-NFκB at a final concentration of 2 μM was incubated in goat serum (life technology, Grand Island, NY, USA) at 37°C for 24 h. An aliquot was withdrawn at appropriate time intervals and treated at 80-100°C for 5 min to quench the digestion reaction. The samples were then electrophoresed on 8% denaturing urea gel to analyze the integrity of the ODNs.

ODN treatments in models in vitro: TNF-α model:

The confluent bEND5 cells were incubated with GS24-NFκB or its corresponding controls in serum free medium for 2 hour. Then TNF-α (50 ng/ml) (Shenandoah Biotechnology, Warwick, PA, USA) was added to the medium to stimulate inflammation of bEND5 cells for 4 hours, after which cell samples were harvested.

The OGD/R model

the OGD/R model was used to mimic ischemia/reperfusion in vitro. Hypoxia was induced by placing cells in a sealed chamber (BillupsRothenberg, Del Mar, CA) at 37 °C, which has been flushed with 95% N2 /5% CO2 gas. The concentration of oxygen in the atmosphere was maintained at 0% oxygen and the PO2 in the medium was below 25 mmHg. Glycaemia was induced by using RPMI 1640 medium without L-glucose (Hyclone, Logan, UT). After 9 hours OGD, the cells were moved back to normal growth condition for 16 hours. Then the growth medium was changed to serum free medium with the addition of GS24-NFκB or its corresponding controls for another 8 hours. The cell samples were obtained 24 h after re-oxygenation.

RT-PCR and Western blotting

The bEND5 cells under different conditions were treated with various doses of ODNs or equal doses of the scramble control ODNs. RNA samples were evaluated by RT-PCR and protein samples were analyzed by western blotting to determine nuclear levels of P-65 and expression of ICAM-1 and/or VCAM-1. β-Actin was used as a protein loading control marker for whole cell lysates and TATA binding protein (TBP) was used as a protein loading control marker for nuclear protein. The following antibodies were used in western blotting procedure: 1: 2,000 (dilution) β-Actin antibody, 1:2000 NF-κB p65 antibody, 1;1000 phospho-NF-κB p65 (Ser536) antibody (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA), 1:1,000 ICAM-1 antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA), 1:2,000 VCAM-1 antibody and 1:1,000 TBP antibody (Abcam, Cambridge, MA). mRNA expression was measured using the following forward and reverse qPCR primers: VCAM-1: 5′-AAG ACT GAA GTT GGC TCA CAA-3′ and 5′-GGA GTT CGG GCG AAA AAT AG-3′; ICAM-1: 5′-GGG AAT GTC ACC AGG AAT GT-3′ and 5′-CAG TAC TGG CAC CAG AAT GA-3′; β-actin: 5′-GGC TGT ATT CCC CTC CAT CG-3′ and 5′-CCA GTT GGT AAC AAT GCC ATG T-3′. The mRNA expression of β-actin was used as an internal control. All the primers were purchased from Integrated DNA Technologies Inc.

Nuclear protein extraction

Cells were washed and lysed in ice cold buffer-A containing 10 mM HEPES pH 7.9, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 10mM KCl, 0.25% v/v noident P-40, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), and 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF) in deionized water (dH2O) for 10 min. The supernatant, cytoplasmic, and nuclear pellet fractions were obtained by centrifuging cell samples at 12,000g for 2 min. Nuclear protein was extracted from the pellet with ice cold buffer-B containing 20 mM HEPES pH 7.9, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.42 M NaCl, 0.5 mM DTT, 25% v/v Glycerol, and 0.5 mM PMSF in diH2O for 20 min. Then the nuclear fractions were collected and diluted in buffer-C containing 20 mM HEPES pH 7.9, 50 mM KCl, 0.5 mM DTT, 0.2 mM EDTA, and 0.5 mM PMSF. Finally, the protein concentrations were measured, and western blotting was performed. All the chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Inc.

Adhesion assay

U937 cells (ATCC) were incubated with 5 mg/mL BCECF-AM (2′,7′-bis(2-carboxyethyl)-5(6)-carboxyfluorescein acetoxymethyl ester, Sigma Inc.) for 30 minutes at 37°C, and then the cells were washed and re-suspended in serum free media. For ODN treatments in TNF-α stimulated bEND5 cells, cells were cultured and incubated with ODNs in a 24-well plate for 2 h. Then TNF-α (20ng/ml) was added for 16 h, after which the cells were incubated with BCECF-AM-labeled U937 cells (106cells/well) for 30 minutes at 37°C. For ODN treatments in OGD/R condition, the bEND5 cells were treated as described earlies in the OGD/R model, and then cells were incubated with BCECF-AM-labeled U937 cells (106cells/well) for 30 minutes at 37°C. Non-adhering U937 cells were removed and cells were washed with PBS, and subsequently lysed in 0.1% Triton X-100 in 0.1M Tris-HCl (pH7.4) (Sigma-Aldrich). Fluorescence (F) was measured with a microplate fluorescence reader (POLAR star OPTIMA, BMG Labtechnologies, Ortenberg, Germany) using an excitation of 492 nm and an emission of 535 nm. The monocyte adhesion was calculated as: Adhesion (%) =100×Fsample/F total (F: fluorescence intensity of 106cells).

Brain distribution of GS24-NFκB

Male CD1 mice (body weight ~25g, supplied by Charles River Inc, Wilmington, MA, USA) were anaesthetized by injection of Ketamine and Xylazine (Butler Animal Health Supply Inc. Dublin, OH, USA). 32P-labeled ODNs (13μg, 100μl, ~2μCi) were intravenously administered through the jugular vein. Blood samples were obtained by puncture of the retroorbital venous plexus at 1 h. Mice were then sacrificed by decapitation and brains were sampled and weighed. Blood was centrifuged at 2000 × g at 4°C for 10min, and the plasma was collected. Brains were cut into pieces and then solubilized in 3% KOH at 50°C for 4h. Radioactivity of all samples was measured on a LSC 6500-multiplepurpose scintillation counter. Measurements of injected solutions were used to determine the injected dose of radioactivity. ODN concentrations in the brains were expressed as percent of injected dose %ID/g. The results were corrected for capillary plasma content (9.3μl/g) in the brain.

ODN treatments in LPS model in vivo

Lipopolysaccharide (LPS, Sigma-Aldrich Inc.) was dissolved in sterile saline, aliquoted, and stored at −20°C until use at which time a single intraperitoneal injection of 1mg/kg LPS was administered. To measure phospho-p65 expression, 15mg/kg GS24-NFκB or scramble ODNs were administered by intravenous (i.v.) injection 3 h after LPS challenge. Brain samples were obtained 3 h after ODN treatment and tested for detection of phospho-p65 expression. For analysis of VCAM-1 expression, 15mg/kg GS24-NF-κB or scramble ODNs were administered by i.v. injection 16 h after LPS injection. Brain samples were collected 4 h after ODN treatment.

Brain micro-vessel isolation

Brain samples were homogenized in a tissue grinder with ice cold medium-131 (life technologies, Grand Island, NY) supplemented with 2% FBS, and 1% (v/v) 10,000 IU/ml penicillin/10,000 μg/ml streptomycin. The homogenates were suspended in 16% dextran (average molecular weight 100,000, Sigma-Aldrich Inc.) and centrifuged at 5000RPM for 20 min. Then the fatty layer of the supernatant was removed, and the vascular pellet was digested with 0.1% collagenase and 10μg/ml DNase at 37°C for 1 h with occasional agitation. The digested micro-vessels were filtered through a 70μm nylon mesh cell filter and collected with centrifugation at 1000g for 5 min. These samples were subsequently lysed and used for further analysis.

Statistical analysis

Data analysis of multiple groups was performed by ANOVA followed by post-tests (Holm-Sidak test for comparison of experimental groups versus control conditions). The p value of < 0.05 was chosen as the threshold of statistical significance.

Results

Formation of GS24-NFκB complex and cellular uptake of GS24-NFκB complex

The design of GS24-NFκB complex is shown in Fig.2A. NF-κB-decoy-2 binds to its complementary sequence in the GS24-NFκB-decoy-1 strand to form GS24-NFκB DNA complex, which contains two functional structures: a GS24 aptamer and a NF-κB decoy (Fig.2A). The formation of the DNA complex was confirmed by 8% native-PAGE gel (Fig.2B). Because the molecular weight of GS24-NFκB complex is the heaviest among the loaded ODNs, its migration distance is the shortest, as is demonstrated by the signal in lane 5 of Fig.2B.

The cellular uptake of 32P-labeled GS24-NFκB complexes was studied in bEND5 cells. The radioactivity value for GS-NFκB was 42491±11668 CPM in bEND5 cells. While it was 6220±3621 CPM for the scramble ODN complex containing scramble GS-24 sequence, which was only 14% of 32P-GS24-NFκB group. The radioactivity value of the 32P-GS24-NFκB group was reduced by 99% to 388±49 CPM after adding excess unlabeled GS24-NFκB (Fig.2C). The specificity of cellular uptake of the GS24-NFκB was also investigated using TfRs silenced bEND5 cells. As shown in Fig.2D, uptake of GS24-NFκB by normal bEND5 cells was significantly higher than that by the TfRs knockdown bEND5 cells. The average cellular uptake of GS24-NFκB was 3.6 times higher than that in the TfR silenced cells (Fig.2D). The serum stability of GS24-NFκB was also examined using goat serum to determine the stability in the blood stream. The results showed that GS24-NFκB was stable and visible in goat serum up to 16 h, and the half-life of the GS24-NFκB in goat serum was about 4 h (Fig.3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Stability of GS24-NFκB in goat serum. The first two lanes are strand-1 or strand-2 of GS24-NFkB in H2O respectively.

Anti-inflammatory effects of GS24-NFκB complex in murine brain-derived endothelial cells induced by TNF-α

TNF-α treatment was used to induce an inflammatory response in bEND5 cells. TNF-α significantly enhanced VCAM-1, and ICAM-1 levels in bEND5 cells and also enhanced levels of p65in the nucleus. TNF-α stimulation increased nuclear p65 protein level to 204.8% of control in bEND5 cells, while 2 μM of GS24-NFκB complex mitigated the TNF-α-induced up-regulation of nuclear p65 by 40% (Fig.4A). VCAM-1 molecules were expressed at very low level in untreated bEND5 cells however, expression of VCAM-1 was remarkably increased by TNF-α stimulation. Remarkably, treatment of TNF-α stimulated cells with 2 μM GS24-NFκB reduced the level of VCAM-1 by 32.6% (Fig.4B). Scramble complexes or NF-κB decoy alone did not have any effect on the levels of VCAM-1 and nuclear p65. Similar results were also seen for the other inflammatory marker, ICAM-1 (Fig.4C). The mRNA levels of ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 were also detected by RT-PCR. As indicated in Fig.5, TNF-α stimulation increased mRNA levels of ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 about 30 fold and 18 fold, respectively, compared to untreated cells. The mRNA levels of ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 were reduced by 42% (Fig.5A) and 50% (Fig.5B) respectively in the 2 μM GS24-NFκB treatment group compared to the TNF- α stimulation group.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

A. Effect of GS24-NFκB on nuclear P65 level in bEND5 cells subjected to TNF-α stimulation in vitro. Protein levels for p65 are expressed as percentage of media control (=100). Media control is normal cell culture media. B. Effect of GS24-NFκB on VCAM-1 level in bEND5 cells subjected to TNF-α stimulation in vitro. The protein levels for VCAM-1 are expressed as percentage of TNFα stimulation (=100). C. Effect of GS24-NFκB on ICAM-1 level in bEND5 cells subjected to TNF-α stimulation in vitro. The protein levels for ICAM-1 are expressed as percentage of media control (=100). Mean±SD, n=5-8, ** indicates p<0.05.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

A. Effect of GS24-NFκB on mRNA level of ICAM-1 level in bEND5 cells subjected to TNF-α stimulation in vitro. Mean±SD, n=4, ** indicates p<0.05. B. Effect of GS24-NFκB on mRNA level of VCAM-1 level in bEND5 cells subjected to TNF-α stimulation in vitro. Mean±SD, n=3, ** indicates p<0.05.

Because increased levels of ICAM-1/VCAM-1 lead to an increase in monocyte adhesion to endothelial cells, we performed monocyte adhesion assays with U-937 cells to examine the effects of GS24-NFκB at the functional level (Fischer et al., 2005). As shown in Fig.6A, when endothelial cells were stimulated by TNF-α, the percentage of U-937 cells adhering to endothelial cells increased to 11.3% compared to that in non-activated endothelial cells which had 6.1% adherent monocytes. GS24-NFκB treatment at concentrations of 2 and 4 μM reduced the percentage of adherent U-937 cells to 7.7% and 7.5% respectively. While the same doses of scramble GS24-NFkB complex (with scramble GS24) did not result in significant decrease in percentage of U-937 cell adhesion at 11.5% and 10.5% respectively (Fig.6A&B).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

A. Effect of GS24-NFκB on adhesion of U937 monocytes to bEND5 cells subjected to TNF-α stimulation. Mean±SD, n=3, ** indicates p<0.05. B. Representative images of cell adhesion. Image-A: medium control condition; Image-B: TNF-α condition; Image-C: scramble control 4μM condition; Image-D: GS24-NFκB 2μM condition; Image-E: GS24-NFκB 4μM condition.

Anti-inflammatory effects of GS24-NFκB complex in murine brain-derived endothelial cells induced by OGD/R

Nuclear p65 levels in OGD/R stimulated bEND5 cells was increased to about 195.8% of non-stimulated control cells, and scramble GS24-NFkB did not have any effect on the level of nuclear p65 in stimulated cells. Treatment of 4 μM and 8 μM of GS24-NFκB complex significantly mitigated the OGD/R-induced up-regulation of nuclear p65. The levels of nuclear p-65 were back to the normal level, which were 136.9 %, 129% and 98.9% of control in 2 μM, 4 μM and 8 μM GS24-NFκB treatment groups respectively (Fig.7A). GS24-NFkB treatment of OGD/R stimulated bEND5 cells had a similar effect on the expression of another inflammatory cytokine, VCAM-1 (Fig.7B). 2 μM, 4 μM, or 8 μM GS24-NFκB treatment reduced VCAM-1 expression to 72%, 67%, and 54% of the OGD/R-alone cells respectively. Scramble controls did not significantly reduce VCAM-1 expression (Fig.7B).

Figure 7.

Figure 7

A. Effect of GS24-NFκB on nuclear P65 level in bEND5 cells subjected to OGD/R. B. Effect of GS24-NFκB on VCAM-1 level in bEND5 cells subjected to OGD/R. Mean±SD, n=3, ** indicates p<0.05.

To determine if the inhibitory effects of GS24-NFκB on nuclear p-65 and its down-stream adhesion molecules were sufficient to have effect on functional level we performed an adhesion assay. As shown in Fig.8A, the percentage of U-937 cells adhering to endothelial cells in OGD/R-stimulated bEND5 cells increased to 9.9% compared to the medium control bEND5 cells (5.2%). 2 μM, 4μM, or 8μM GS24-NFκB treatment reduced the percentage of adherent U-937 cells in OGD/R-stimulated cells to 5.9%, 6.7%, and 3.9% respectively. The same doses of scramble GS24-NFkB complex did not have effect on percentage of U-937 cell adhesion (Fig.8A, B).

Figure 8.

Figure 8

A. Effect of GS24-NFκB on adhesion of U937 monocytes to bEND5 cells subjected to OGD/R. B. Representative images of cell adhesion. Mean±SD, n=3, ** indicates p<0.05. Image-A: Medium control; Image-B: OGD/R; Image-C: scramble control (4μM); Image-D: GS24-NFκB 2μM; Image-E: GS24-NFκB 4μM; Image-F: GS24-NFκB 8μM.

Brain uptake and the effect of GS24-NFκB on cerebral vascular inflammation in vivo

Following intravenous injection of 32P-labeled GS24-NFκB or scramble ODNs, whole brain samples were found to have significantly higher uptake of GS24-NFκB than that of the scramble ODN complexes. As shown in Fig.9, brain accumulation of GS24-NFκB was 0.39±0.0.5% of injection dose/gram of tissue (ID/g), while it was only 0.23±0.01% of ID/g for the scramble ODNs. Furthermore, we used a LPS-induced inflammatory model in vivo to evaluate the effect of GS24-NFκB on cerebral vascular inflammation. LPS, a component of the Gram-negative bacteria cell wall, is a potent inducer of inflammation and now commonly used to produce inflammation. Since brain endothelial cells were the main targets in this study, the brain micro-vessel fraction was isolated and used to analyze the effects of GS24-NFκB by measuring the levels of phospho-p65 and VCAM-1. LPS administration significantly increased the level of phospho-p65 and VCAM-1. However, GS24-NFκB reduced the level of phospho-p65 (141±26% of PBS control) by 30% compared to that of scramble ODN (201±34% of PBS control) (Fig.10A). In addition, VCAM-1 expression in the scramble control group was 218±39% of PBS control, while the level was significantly decreased by 35% (142±29 % of PBS control) with systemic administration of GS24-NFκB (Fig.10B).

Figure 9.

Figure 9

Brain uptake of GS24-NFκB in mouse brain. Brain accumulation of GS24-NFκB is expressed as % of injection dose (ID/g). Mean±SD, n=3, ** indicates p<0.05.

Figure 10.

Figure 10

A. GS24-NFκB by i.v. injection decreased nuclear p-P65 level in brain endothelial cells of mouse subjected to LPS injection. B. GS24-NFκB by i.v. injection decreased VCAM-1 level in brain endothelial cells of mouse subjected to LPS injection. Mean±SD, n=6, ** indicates p<0.05

Discussion

There are a number of receptor-mediated transport systems existing on the endothelial cells of the BBB, which are excellent targets for brain drug delivery. Among these receptor transport systems, TfRs are the most studied receptors for brain drug delivery. TfRs are highly expressed on the microvascular endothelial cells of the BBB, glia, and neurons in the CNS (Moos, 1996). The bEND5 cells used in this study also have high expression of TfR (Bhattacharya et al., 2008). Furthermore, expression of TfRs is up-regulated in some brain diseases like ischemic stroke (Omori et al., 2003). Due to the high expression of TfRs at the BBB, targeting them for drug delivery gives us greater specificity for delivery to the brain. The TfRs at the BBB have been utilized to deliver neurotrophic factors (Zhang and Pardridge, 2001), peptide hormones (Bickel et al., 1993), and immunoliposomes plasmids (Zhang et al., 2003) into the brain. However, none of these approaches have translated to clinical therapy because of a poor pharmacokinetic profile due to the large size and protein content of these molecules. In the present study, we explored an aptamer-directed DNA complex as an alternative approach for brain drug delivery. An ODN-based brain drug delivery system was developed, which consists of an NF-κB decoy and a GS24 aptamer (Fig. 2A) for targeted delivery of NF-κB decoy into brain endothelial cells. GS24 is a DNA aptamer (Fig. 2A) that can specifically bind to the extracellular domain of mouse TfR (TfR-ECD) for cellular uptake. It was discovered and produced by systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment (SELEX) (Chen et al., 2008). The central goal of the present study is to target endothelial NF-κB using GS24-NFκB to inhibit vascular inflammation. As shown in Fig.2B, a completely DNA-based complex was synthesized (lane 5). Uptake of GS24-NFκB was investigated both in vitro and in vivo using brain-derived endothelial cells and mouse models respectively. Compared with the scramble DNA complex, cellular uptake of 32P-GS24-NFκB was significantly higher, and this uptake could be inhibited by adding excess unlabeled GS24-NFκB (Fig.2C). Moreover, cellular uptake of GS24-NFκB was reduced when TfR expression in bEND5 cells was knocked down (Fig.2D). This data indicates that delivery of GS24-NFκB to cells via TfR is specific. Furthermore, the stability of GS24-NFκB was stable and detectable in goat serum for up to 16 h (Fig. 3).

We used two in vitro inflammatory conditions, TNF-α stimulation and OGD/R, which induce inflammation in endothelial cells to examine the anti-inflammatory capability of GS24-NFκB. Our results indicate that, in the absence of a transfection reagent, GS24-NFκB inhibited the levels of ICAM-1, VCAM-1, and nuclear p65 in bEND5 cells under inflammatory conditions (TNF-α stimulation) (Fig.4, Fig.5). Furthermore, GS24-NFκB inhibited monocyte adhesion to TNF-α stimulated bEND5 cells (Fig.6). Similar results were observed in the OGD/R stimulated cells as shown in Fig.7 and Fig.8. This finding is significant because it demonstrates that GS24-NFκB could potentially be used as a therapy for ischemic stroke or other neuro-inflammatory diseases. In order to demonstrate the feasibility of using GS24-NFκB for vascular inflammation therapy, we performed an in vivo analysis. Brain accumulation of GS24-NFκB, and its effect on the NF-κB signaling pathway in cerebral vasculature were evaluated in the mouse. Brain accumulation of GS24-NFκB was significantly higher than that of scramble DNA complex (Fig.9). Furthermore, GS24-NFκB significantly inhibited LPS-induced up-regulation of phosphorylation of p65 and expression of VCAM-1 (Fig. 10). The reduced level of p65 in the nucleus in response to GS24-NFκB treatment is consistent with a previous study (D’Acquisto et al., 2001). Previous studies have shown that NF-κB decoy resides both in the cytoplasm and nucleus of cells after entering the cell, however, the majority of NF-κB decoy is located in cytoplasm (Griesenbach et al., 2000, Griesenbach et al., 2002, Liu et al., 2010).

Based on this study and others, we hypothesize that the reduced nuclear level of p65 observed in our study may be due to: (1) NF-κB decoy may interact with NF-κB dimers in the cytoplasm causing increased degradation. (2) NF-κB-decoy/NF-κB-dimer complex may reduce its nuclear translocation due to an increase in size. As illustrated in Fig.1, the mechanism of GS24-NFκB activity proposed in our study is that after GS24-NFκB is enters the cell by an interaction between GS24 and TfR-ECD, the NF-κB decoy portion of the GS24-NF-κB will bind to the “cis”- binding sequence of free NF-κB units. The formation of this new ODN-NF-κB complex will prevent the cis-trans interaction between the NF-κB unit and the promoter region of the target gene (Morishita et al., 1998) and/or prevent NF-κB nuclear translocation, both of which lead to inhibition of NF-κB activity. Phosphorylation of p65 is an indicator of NF-κB activity. To obtain a maximal NF-κB response, phosphorylation serves to regulate NF-κB activity (Cheng et al., 2005). Upon stimulation, NF-κB translocates to the nucleus and is phosphorylated (Ser536). Phosphorylated p65 (Ser536) facilitates the recruitment of transcriptional coactivators (Perkins, 2006). Our results indicate that the phosphorylation of p65 decreased with NF-κB decoy treatment. This observation may be due to the reduction in the overall level of nuclear p65. While phospho-p65 levels and VCAM-1 expression were significantly reduced in brain endothelial cells in vitro, the remaining question is whether the treatment will reduce inflammation at the endothelium in vivo. Further study should be performed to investigate the effect of GS24-NFκB on the adhesion and trans-endothelial migration of neutrophils, and vascular inflammation in vivo.

As described earlier, NF-κB is formed by homo- and heterodimers made up by pair of the five different subunits (Gilmore, 2006), and associates with IκB proteins in the cytosol in its inactive form (Jacobs and Harrison, 1998, Schwaninger et al., 2006). Different cell types may have different combinations of NF-κB subunits, indicating its involvement in a variety of functions. Dimers of NF-κB subunits bind to a set of specific DNA elements in the enhancers/promoters of target genes, which may lead to change in the target gene expression. Although there are many combinations of NF-κB, the p50/p65 dimer is the most abundant one, found in almost all cell types (Oeckinghaus and Ghosh, 2009). Data from cultured endothelial cells indicated that p50 and p65 are the predominant species found in the nucleus upon cytokine activation (Collins et al., 1995, Pober, 2002). Since all NF-κB proteins share a highly conserved Rel homology domain (DNA-binding/dimerization domain), NF-κB decoy is supposed not specific to certain type of NF-κB units combination (Gilmore, 2006). We propose that the binding of NF-κB decoy to free NF-κB dimers induced by an inflammatory stimulus leads to NF-κB inhibition in brain endothelial cells, and subsequently blocks the activation of target genes involved in vascular inflammation.

It is important to note that certain NF-κB activities may be needed for maintaining BBB integrity and function (Ridder et al.), and normal NF-κB activity in the brain vascular endothelial cells is important. Excessive suppression of NF-κB activity may have an adverse effect on the normal functions of BBB. However, over-activation of NF-κB in response to inflammatory conditions upregulates inflammatory molecules, exacerbating inflammation and further damaging the BBB. GS24-NFκB was able to inhibit the hyper-activated NF-κB in brain endothelial cells under inflammatory conditions, but did not completely block its activity. Our data showed that GS24-NFκB reduced the inflammation-induced up-regulation of nuclear p65 and its downstream cytokines, returning levels to basal conditions without completely blocking expression.

Another concern is that NF-κB can be neuroprotective, and preventing its activity could be adverse to neuronal survival (Yu et al., 2000, Dutta et al., 2006, Fan et al., 2008). Our study utilizes an ODN delivery system that selectively targets TfRs, which are highly expressed on brain endothelial cells, and thus, may alleviate this issue. TfR can mediate transport via endocytosis or transcytosis, and is then recycled back to cell membrane (Bien-Ly et al.,, Dufes et al.,, Orita et al., 1990), with endocytosis being the most commonly occurring process. Many studies have provided evidence that substances delivered by anti-TfR ligands were primarily trapped in brain endothelial cells (Moos and Morgan, 2001, Paris-Robidas et al., 2011). Therefore, transcytosis of GS24-NFκB should be limited, reducing the likelihood of GS24-NFκB inhibiting NF-κB activity in the rest of the brain. Therefore, we hypothesize that the majority of GS24-NFκB will be sequestered at the BBB level after i.v. administration. Further experiments should be performed to study the effect of GS24-NFκB on the normal NF-κB activity in brain endothelial cells, and on neuronal survival, as well as to study the distribution of GS24-NFκB in the brain beyond the BBB. Lastly, because there are other types of TfR expressing cells in the body, e.g. hepatocytes, red blood cells, and white blood cells etc., GS24-NFκB can also be taken up by these cells. Although those TfR expressing cells may reduce the efficacy of brain delivery, we anticipate that the overall outcome will be anti-inflammatory, because inhibition of NF-κB activity in white blood cells will also suppress inflammation. However, because GS24-NFκB may causes adverse effects on hepatocytes or other TfR expressing cells, further studies should be performed to investigate these potential toxic effects of GS24-NFκB.

In conclusion, the present study has synthesized an ODN based complex, GS24-NFκB, and delivered it into brain endothelial cells to inhibit NF-κB activity. The GS24-NFκB may give more specificity and efficacy in NF-κB inhibition by targeting a disease relevant cell population, the brain endothelial cells. Therefore, the refined approach used in the present study will only inhibit deleterious NF-κB in cerebral vascular endothelium but leave beneficial NF-κB activity unaffected. This study provides proof of concept for brain-targeted drug delivery and modulating a particular cell population relevant to the disease, the brain endothelial cells. The study explores the cerebral endothelial cell as a novel site of action for brain drug delivery and neuro-vascular inflammation therapy.

Highlights.

  • A novel DNA-based complex was synthesized for inhibition vascular inflammation.

  • The GS-24 is the moiety to transport DNA complex into endothelial cell.

  • The DNA complex could be potentially used for inhibiting inflammation at the BBB.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Neurological Disease and Stroke [Grant 1R15NS088384-01A1]. This work is dedicated by the authors to the memory of their mentors and colleagues. The authors also thank the James L. Winkle College of Pharmacy, University of Cincinnati for supporting this work.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Disclosure/conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Reference

  1. Aloisi F. Immune function of microglia. Glia. 2001;36:165–179. doi: 10.1002/glia.1106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Auphan N, DiDonato JA, Rosette C, Helmberg A, Karin M. Immunosuppression by glucocorticoids: inhibition of NF-kappa B activity through induction of I kappa B synthesis. Science. 1995;270:286–290. doi: 10.1126/science.270.5234.286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Baldwin AS., Jr. Series introduction: the transcription factor NF-kappaB and human disease. J Clin Invest. 2001;107:3–6. doi: 10.1172/JCI11891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Barone FC, Arvin B, White RF, Miller A, Webb CL, Willette RN, Lysko PG, Feuerstein GZ. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha. A mediator of focal ischemic brain injury. Stroke. 1997;28:1233–1244. doi: 10.1161/01.str.28.6.1233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Beg AA, Baltimore D. An essential role for NF-kappaB in preventing TNF-α alpha-induced cell death. Science. 1996;274:782–784. doi: 10.1126/science.274.5288.782. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bhattacharya R, Osburg B, Fischer D, Bickel U. Targeted delivery of complexes of biotin-PEG-polyethylenimine and NF-kappaB decoys to brain-derived endothelial cells in vitro. Pharm Res. 2008;25:605–615. doi: 10.1007/s11095-007-9389-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bickel U, Yoshikawa T, Landaw EM, Faull KF, Pardridge WM. Pharmacologic effects in vivo in brain by vector-mediated peptide drug delivery. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993;90:2618–2622. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.7.2618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bielinska A, Shivdasani RA, Zhang LQ, Nabel GJ. Regulation of gene expression with double-stranded phosphorothioate oligonucleotides. Science. 1990;250:997–1000. doi: 10.1126/science.2237444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bien-Ly N, Yu YJ, Bumbaca D, Elstrott J, Boswell CA, Zhang Y, Luk W, Lu Y, Dennis MS, Weimer RM, Chung I, Watts RJ. Transferrin receptor (TfR) trafficking determines brain uptake of TfR antibody affinity variants. J Exp Med. 211:233–244. doi: 10.1084/jem.20131660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Chen CH, Dellamaggiore KR, Ouellette CP, Sedano CD, Lizadjohry M, Chernis GA, Gonzales M, Baltasar FE, Fan AL, Myerowitz R, Neufeld EF. Aptamer-based endocytosis of a lysosomal enzyme. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:15908–15913. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0808360105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Cheng JQ, Lindsley CW, Cheng GZ, Yang H, Nicosia SV. The Akt/PKB pathway: molecular target for cancer drug discovery. Oncogene. 2005;24:7482–7492. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Collins T, Read MA, Neish AS, Whitley MZ, Thanos D, Maniatis T. Transcriptional regulation of endothelial cell adhesion molecules: NF-kappa B and cytokine-inducible enhancers. Faseb J. 1995;9:899–909. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. D’Acquisto F, Ianaro A, Ialenti A, Maffia P, Maiuri MC, Carnuccio R. Transcription factor decoy oligodeoxynucleotides to nuclear factor-kappaB inhibit reverse passive Arthus reaction in rat. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2001;364:422–429. doi: 10.1007/s002100100472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. de Vries HE, Blom-Roosemalen MC, de Boer AG, van Berkel TJ, Breimer DD, Kuiper J. Effect of endotoxin on permeability of bovine cerebral endothelial cell layers in vitro. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1996a;277:1418–1423. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. de Vries HE, Blom-Roosemalen MC, van Oosten M, de Boer AG, van Berkel TJ, Breimer DD, Kuiper J. The influence of cytokines on the integrity of the blood-brain barrier in vitro. J Neuroimmunol. 1996b;64:37–43. doi: 10.1016/0165-5728(95)00148-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Duckworth EA, Butler T, Collier L, Collier S, Pennypacker KR. NF-kappaB protects neurons from ischemic injury after middle cerebral artery occlusion in mice. Brain Res. 2006;1088:167–175. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.02.103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Dufes C, Al Robaian M, Somani S. Transferrin and the transferrin receptor for the targeted delivery of therapeutic agents to the brain and cancer cells. Ther Deliv. 4:629–640. doi: 10.4155/tde.13.21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Dutta J, Fan Y, Gupta N, Fan G, Gelinas C. Current insights into the regulation of programmed cell death by NF-kappaB. Oncogene. 2006;25:6800–6816. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Fan Y, Dutta J, Gupta N, Fan G, Gelinas C. Regulation of programmed cell death by NF-kappaB and its role in tumorigenesis and therapy. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2008;615:223–250. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-6554-5_11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Fischer D, Bhattacharya R, Osburg B, Bickel U. Inhibition of monocyte adhesion on brain-derived endothelial cells by NF-kappaB decoy/polyethylenimine complexes. J Gene Med. 2005;7:1063–1076. doi: 10.1002/jgm.747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Gilmore TD. Introduction to NF-kappaB: players, pathways, perspectives. Oncogene. 2006;25:6680–6684. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209954. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Griesenbach U, Cassady RL, Cain RJ, duBois RM, Geddes DM, Alton EW. Cytoplasmic deposition of NFkappaB decoy oligonucleotides is insufficient to inhibit bleomycin-induced pulmonary inflammation. Gene Ther. 2002;9:1109–1115. doi: 10.1038/sj.gt.3301776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Griesenbach U, Scheid P, Hillery E, de Martin R, Huang L, Geddes DM, Alton EW. Anti-inflammatory gene therapy directed at the airway epithelium. Gene Ther. 2000;7:306–313. doi: 10.1038/sj.gt.3301078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Henninger DD, Panes J, Eppihimer M, Russell J, Gerritsen M, Anderson DC, Granger DN. Cytokine-induced VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 expression in different organs of the mouse. J Immunol. 1997;158:1825–1832. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Hess DC, Howard E, Cheng C, Carroll J, Hill WD, Hsu CY. Hypertonic mannitol loading of NF-kappaB transcription factor decoys in human brain microvascular endothelial cells blocks upregulation of ICAM-1. Stroke. 2000;31:1179–1186. doi: 10.1161/01.str.31.5.1179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Hill WD, Hess DC, Carroll JE, Wakade CG, Howard EF, Chen Q, Cheng C, Martin-Studdard A, Waller JL, Beswick RA. The NF-kappaB inhibitor diethyldithiocarbamate (DDTC) increases brain cell death in a transient middle cerebral artery occlusion model of ischemia. Brain Res Bull. 2001;55:375–386. doi: 10.1016/s0361-9230(01)00503-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Huang FP, Wang ZQ, Wu DC, Schielke GP, Sun Y, Yang GY. Early NFkappaB activation is inhibited during focal cerebral ischemia in interleukin-1beta-converting enzyme deficient mice. J Neurosci Res. 2003;73:698–707. doi: 10.1002/jnr.10654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Jacobs MD, Harrison SC. Structure of an IkappaBalpha/NF-kappaB complex. Cell. 1998;95:749–758. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81698-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Keifer JA, Guttridge DC, Ashburner BP, Baldwin AS., Jr. Inhibition of NF-kappa B activity by thalidomide through suppression of IkappaB kinase activity. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:22382–22387. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M100938200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Kooij G, van Horssen J, de Lange EC, Reijerkerk A, van der Pol SM, van Het Hof B, Drexhage J, Vennegoor A, Killestein J, Scheffer G, Oerlemans R, Scheper R, van der Valk P, Dijkstra CD, de Vries HE. T lymphocytes impair P-glycoprotein function during neuroinflammation. J Autoimmun. 34:416–425. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2009.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Lacroix S, Feinstein D, Rivest S. The bacterial endotoxin lipopolysaccharide has the ability to target the brain in upregulating its membrane CD14 receptor within specific cellular populations. Brain Pathol. 1998;8:625–640. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3639.1998.tb00189.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Laflamme N, Lacroix S, Rivest S. An essential role of interleukin-1beta in mediating NF-kappaB activity and COX-2 transcription in cells of the blood-brain barrier in response to a systemic and localized inflammation but not during endotoxemia. J Neurosci. 1999;19:10923–10930. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-24-10923.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Lindsberg PJ, Carpen O, Paetau A, Karjalainen-Lindsberg ML, Kaste M. Endothelial ICAM-1 expression associated with inflammatory cell response in human ischemic stroke. Circulation. 1996;94:939–945. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.94.5.939. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Liu SF, Ye X, Malik AB. Inhibition of NF-kappaB activation by pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate prevents In vivo expression of proinflammatory genes. Circulation. 1999a;100:1330–1337. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.100.12.1330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Liu SF, Ye X, Malik AB. Pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate prevents I-kappaB degradation and reduces microvascular injury induced by lipopolysaccharide in multiple organs. Mol Pharmacol. 1999b;55:658–667. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Liu Y, Quan F, Wang J, Bai X. [Nuclear localization of oligonucleotides decoy effect on nuclear factor-kappaB activity] Sheng Wu Gong Cheng Xue Bao. 2010;26:1683–1689. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Matsuda N, Hattori Y, Takahashi Y, Nishihira J, Jesmin S, Kobayashi M, Gando S. Therapeutic effect of in vivo transfection of transcription factor decoy to NF-kappaB on septic lung in mice. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2004;287:L1248–1255. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00164.2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Moos T. Immunohistochemical localization of intraneuronal transferrin receptor immunoreactivity in the adult mouse central nervous system. J Comp Neurol. 1996;375:675–692. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19961125)375:4<675::AID-CNE8>3.0.CO;2-Z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Moos T, Morgan EH. Restricted transport of anti-transferrin receptor antibody (OX26) through the blood-brain barrier in the rat. J Neurochem. 2001;79:119–129. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2001.00541.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Morishita R, Higaki J, Tomita N, Ogihara T. Application of transcription factor “decoy” strategy as means of gene therapy and study of gene expression in cardiovascular disease. Circ Res. 1998;82:1023–1028. doi: 10.1161/01.res.82.10.1023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Morishita R, Sugimoto T, Aoki M, Kida I, Tomita N, Moriguchi A, Maeda K, Sawa Y, Kaneda Y, Higaki J, Ogihara T. In vivo transfection of cis element “decoy” against nuclear factor-kappaB binding site prevents myocardial infarction. Nat Med. 1997;3:894–899. doi: 10.1038/nm0897-894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Nadeau S, Rivest S. Regulation of the gene encoding tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) in the rat brain and pituitary in response in different models of systemic immune challenge. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1999;58:61–77. doi: 10.1097/00005072-199901000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Nakajima K, Kohsaka S. Microglia: activation and their significance in the central nervous system. J Biochem. 2001;130:169–175. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a002969. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Nijboer CH, Heijnen CJ, Groenendaal F, May MJ, van Bel F, Kavelaars A. A dual role of the NF-kappaB pathway in neonatal hypoxic-ischemic brain damage. Stroke. 2008;39:2578–2586. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.516401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Nurmi A, Vartiainen N, Pihlaja R, Goldsteins G, Yrjanheikki J, Koistinaho J. Pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate inhibits translocation of nuclear factor kappa-B in neurons and protects against brain ischaemia with a wide therapeutic time window. J Neurochem. 2004;91:755–765. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2004.02756.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Oeckinghaus A, Ghosh S. The NF-kappaB family of transcription factors and its regulation. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2009;1:a000034. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a000034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Omori N, Maruyama K, Jin G, Li F, Wang SJ, Hamakawa Y, Sato K, Nagano I, Shoji M, Abe K. Targeting of post-ischemic cerebral endothelium in rat by liposomes bearing polyethylene glycol-coupled transferrin. Neurol Res. 2003;25:275–279. doi: 10.1179/016164103101201508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Orita T, Akimura T, Nishizaki T, Kamiryo T, Ikeyama Y, Aoki H, Ito H. Transferrin receptors in injured brain. Acta Neuropathol. 1990;79:686–688. doi: 10.1007/BF00294248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Pan W, Yu C, Hsuchou H, Kastin AJ. The role of cerebral vascular NFkappaB in LPS-induced inflammation: differential regulation of efflux transporter and transporting cytokine receptors. Cell Physiol Biochem. 25:623–630. doi: 10.1159/000315081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Paris-Robidas S, Emond V, Tremblay C, Soulet D, Calon F. In vivo labeling of brain capillary endothelial cells after intravenous injection of monoclonal antibodies targeting the transferrin receptor. Mol Pharmacol. 2011;80:32–39. doi: 10.1124/mol.111.071027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Perkins ND. Post-translational modifications regulating the activity and function of the nuclear factor kappa B pathway. Oncogene. 2006;25:6717–6730. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209937. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Pober JS. Endothelial activation: intracellular signaling pathways. Arthritis Res. 2002;4(Suppl 3):S109–116. doi: 10.1186/ar576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Qian ZM, Li H, Sun H, Ho K. Targeted drug delivery via the transferrin receptor-mediated endocytosis pathway. Pharmacol Rev. 2002;54:561–587. doi: 10.1124/pr.54.4.561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Quan N, Whiteside M, Herkenham M. Cyclooxygenase 2 mRNA expression in rat brain after peripheral injection of lipopolysaccharide. Brain Res. 1998a;802:189–197. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(98)00402-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Quan N, Whiteside M, Herkenham M. Time course and localization patterns of interleukin-1beta messenger RNA expression in brain and pituitary after peripheral administration of lipopolysaccharide. Neuroscience. 1998b;83:281–293. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(97)00350-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Quan N, Whiteside M, Kim L, Herkenham M. Induction of inhibitory factor kappaBalpha mRNA in the central nervous system after peripheral lipopolysaccharide administration: an in situ hybridization histochemistry study in the rat. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;94:10985–10990. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.20.10985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Ray A, Prefontaine KE. Physical association and functional antagonism between the p65 subunit of transcription factor NF-kappa B and the glucocorticoid receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994;91:752–756. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.2.752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Ridder DA, Wenzel J, Muller K, Tollner K, Tong XK, Assmann JC, Stroobants S, Weber T, Niturad C, Fischer L, Lembrich B, Wolburg H, Grand’Maison M, Papadopoulos P, Korpos E, Truchetet F, Rades D, Sorokin LM, Schmidt-Supprian M, Bedell BJ, Pasparakis M, Balschun D, D’Hooge R, Loscher W, Hamel E, Schwaninger M. Brain endothelial TAK1 and NEMO safeguard the neurovascular unit. J Exp Med. 212:1529–1549. doi: 10.1084/jem.20150165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Schwaninger M, Inta I, Herrmann O. NF-kappaB signalling in cerebral ischaemia. Biochem Soc Trans. 2006;34:1291–1294. doi: 10.1042/BST0341291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Shen H, Kannari K, Yamato H, Arai A, Matsunaga M. Effects of benserazide on L-DOPA-derived extracellular dopamine levels and aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase activity in the striatum of 6-hydroxydopamine-lesioned rats. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2003;199:149–159. doi: 10.1620/tjem.199.149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Stanimirovic DB, Wong J, Shapiro A, Durkin JP. Increase in surface expression of ICAM-1, VCAM-1 and E-selectin in human cerebromicrovascular endothelial cells subjected to ischemia-like insults. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 1997;70:12–16. doi: 10.1007/978-3-7091-6837-0_4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Tomita N, Morishita R, Tomita S, Gibbons GH, Zhang L, Horiuchi M, Kaneda Y, Higaki J, Ogihara T, Dzau VJ. Transcription factor decoy for NFkappaB inhibits TNF-alpha-induced cytokine and adhesion molecule expression in vivo. Gene Ther. 2000;7:1326–1332. doi: 10.1038/sj.gt.3301243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Tomita N, Morishita R, Tomita S, Kaneda Y, Higaki J, Ogihara T, Horiuchi M. Inhibition of TNF-alpha, induced cytokine and adhesion molecule. Expression in glomerular cells in vitro and in vivo by transcription factor decoy for NFkappaB. Exp Nephrol. 2001;9:181–190. doi: 10.1159/000052610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Tomita N, Morishita R, Tomita S, Yamamoto K, Aoki M, Matsushita H, Hayashi S, Higaki J, Ogihara T. Transcription factor decoy for nuclear factor-kappaB inhibits tumor necrosis factor-alpha-induced expression of interleukin-6 and intracellular adhesion molecule-1 in endothelial cells. J Hypertens. 1998;16:993–1000. doi: 10.1097/00004872-199816070-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Vanderlugt CL, Rahbe SM, Elliott PJ, Dal Canto MC, Miller SD. Treatment of established relapsing experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis with the proteasome inhibitor PS-519. J Autoimmun. 2000;14:205–211. doi: 10.1006/jaut.2000.0370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Wang X, Qin ZH, Shi H, Savitz SI, Qin AP, Jiang Y, Zhang HL. Protective effect of Ginkgolids (A+B) is associated with inhibition of NIK/IKK/IkappaB/NF-kappaB signaling pathway in a rat model of permanent focal cerebral ischemia. Brain Res. 2008;1234:8–15. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.07.102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Wong ML, Rettori V, al-Shekhlee A, Bongiorno PB, Canteros G, McCann SM, Gold PW, Licinio J. Inducible nitric oxide synthase gene expression in the brain during systemic inflammation. Nat Med. 1996;2:581–584. doi: 10.1038/nm0596-581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Xu J, Wu Y, He L, Yang Y, Moore SA, Hsu CY. Regulation of cytokine-induced iNOS expression by a hairpin oligonucleotide in murine cerebral endothelial cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1997;235:394–397. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1997.6800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Xu L, Zhan Y, Wang Y, Feuerstein GZ, Wang X. Recombinant adenoviral expression of dominant negative IkappaBalpha protects brain from cerebral ischemic injury. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2002;299:14–17. doi: 10.1016/s0006-291x(02)02573-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Yang GY, Gong C, Qin Z, Liu XH, Lorris Betz A. Tumor necrosis factor alpha expression produces increased blood-brain barrier permeability following temporary focal cerebral ischemia in mice. Brain Res Mol Brain Res. 1999;69:135–143. doi: 10.1016/s0169-328x(99)00007-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Yilmaz G, Granger DN. Cell adhesion molecules and ischemic stroke. Neurol Res. 2008;30:783–793. doi: 10.1179/174313208X341085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Yu Z, Zhou D, Cheng G, Mattson MP. Neuroprotective role for the p50 subunit of NF-kappaB in an experimental model of Huntington’s disease. J Mol Neurosci. 2000;15:31, 44. doi: 10.1385/JMN:15:1:31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Zhang W, Potrovita I, Tarabin V, Herrmann O, Beer V, Weih F, Schneider A, Schwaninger M. Neuronal activation of NF-kappaB contributes to cell death in cerebral ischemia. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2005;25:30–40. doi: 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Zhang Y, Pardridge WM. Conjugation of brain-derived neurotrophic factor to a blood-brain barrier drug targeting system enables neuroprotection in regional brain ischemia following intravenous injection of the neurotrophin. Brain Res. 2001;889:49–56. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(00)03108-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Zhang YF, Boado RJ, Pardridge WM. Absence of toxicity of chronic weekly intravenous gene therapy with pegylated immunoliposomes. Pharm Res. 2003;20:1779–1785. doi: 10.1023/b:pham.0000003375.13655.f9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES