Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2016 Jun 23;6:28580. doi: 10.1038/srep28580

The association between laminin and microglial morphology in vitro

Wing Yip Tam 1,*, Ngan Pan Bennett Au 1,*, Chi Him Eddie Ma 1,2,3,a
PMCID: PMC4917827  PMID: 27334934

Abstract

Microglia are immune cells in the central nervous system (CNS) that contribute to primary innate immune responses. The morphology of microglia is closely associated with their functional activities. The majority of microglial studies have focused on the ramified or amoeboid morphology; however, bipolar/rod-shaped microglia have recently received much attention. Bipolar/rod-shaped microglia form trains with end-to-end alignment in injured brains and retinae, which is proposed as an important mechanism in CNS repair. We previously established a cell culture model system to enrich bipolar/rod-shaped microglia simply by growing primary microglia on scratched poly-D-lysine (PDL)/laminin-coated surfaces. Here, we investigated the role of laminin in morphological changes of microglia. Bipolar/rod-shaped microglia trains were transiently formed on scratched surfaces without PDL/laminin coating, but the microglia alignment disappeared after 3 days in culture. Amoeboid microglia digested the surrounding laminin, and the gene and protein expression of laminin-cleaving genes Adam9 and Ctss was up-regulated. Interestingly, lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced transformation from bipolar/rod-shaped into amoeboid microglia increased the expression of Adam9 and Ctss, and the expression of these genes in LPS-treated amoeboid-enriched cultures remained unchanged. These results indicate a strong association between laminin and morphological transformation of microglia, shedding new light on the role of bipolar/rod-shaped microglia in CNS repair.

Microglia are the immune cells of the central nervous system (CNS) that are crucial for repair after injury. These cells release inflammatory cytokines and phagocytose damaged cells around the injury site to facilitate wound healing. It has been suggested that the morphology of microglia is highly associated with the function1,2,3 and microenvironment4,5 of these cells. Ramified microglia with motile processes and protrusions are regarded as surveillance cells, which actively sample the neuronal microenvironment1,6,7,8. Amoeboid microglia, with fewer or even absent processes, are highly motile and active phagocytes2,3. Compared to these two well-studied morphologies, bipolar/rod-shaped microglia are much less well characterized. However, it is increasingly evident that bipolar/rod-shaped microglia play a key role in CNS repair. Recent studies have shown that the clustering of bipolar/rod-shaped microglia aligned end-to-end at the damage site after traumatic or ischaemic brain injury9,10,11. We and others have also shown that these bipolar/rod-shaped microglia are highly proliferative2,5,12,13. Additionally, an increase in the number of proliferating microglia minimizes brain damage because the elimination of proliferating microglia induced more severe damage after ischaemic insult in the cortex of genetically engineered mice14,15. The local proliferation of bipolar/rod-shaped microglia, but not infiltrating peripheral macrophages, was detected in the retina after optic nerve injury16. In a laser-induced ocular hypertension (OHT) mouse model, the chain alignment of bipolar/rod-shaped microglia was observed only in the nerve fibre layer of the OHT retina, indicating a key role for bipolar/rod-shaped microglia in axonal degeneration17. These studies clearly demonstrate the critical role of proliferating bipolar/rod-shaped microglia in CNS repair.

The diverse extracellular matrix (ECM) subtypes present in the brain not only contribute to the normal physiology of this organ but are also heavily involved in CNS repair after injury18,19,20. CNS injury results in the deposition of the ECM into the neural interstitial matrix, associated with the alteration of microglial morphology21,22,23. Among ECM proteins that are differentially expressed at the lesion site, elevated laminin expression after CNS injury seems to be beneficial to CNS repair. Laminin provides a growth-permissive microenvironment that promotes the neurite outgrowth of primary cortical and hippocampal neurons in vitro24,25. The pronounced elevation of laminin expression was induced shortly after ischaemic21 (i.e., 6 hours) and traumatic brain injury19,23 (i.e., 24 hours), showing peak expression 3 days after injury23. In addition to a role in promoting axonal growth, laminin up-regulation after CNS injury has been correlated with the transformation of ramified microglia into amoeboid microglia. For example, a rapid morphological transformation of microglia was observed in ischaemic brain injury 6 hours after middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO), while laminin expression was dramatically increased21. The increase in the number of amoeboid microglia observed in the MCAO animal model was consistent with the fact that a majority of microglia adopted amoeboid morphology on poly-D-lysine (PDL)/laminin-coated culture dishes4,5. The vast majority of microglial studies on CNS injury models have focused on ramified or amoeboid morphologies. To our knowledge, there are currently no studies on laminin localization and bipolar/rod-shaped microglia colonization in culture or animal models.

Here, we examined the potential association between laminin and trains of bipolar/rod-shaped microglia using our previously described culture model system5. We showed that bipolar/rod-shaped microglia aligned only within the scratched area of the PDL/laminin-coated surface, and the alignment patterns were similar to those observed in the brain after CNS injury in vivo9,10,16. The microglia became amoeboid on the non-scratched area of the PDL/laminin-coated surface5. In the present study, we demonstrated that laminin was essential in maintaining the bipolar/rod-shaped microglia alignment. Stable microglia alignment could be formed and maintained only on the scratched area of a PDL/laminin-coated surface but not on the scratched area without the PDL/laminin coating. We also observed the degradation of extracellular laminin by amoeboid microglia along with the up-regulation of the mRNA expression of the laminin-cleaving genes a disintegrin and a metalloproteinase domain 9 (Adam9) and cathepsin S (Ctss) in amoeboid-enriched cultures compared with bipolar/rod-enriched cultures. More importantly, the lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced transformation of bipolar/rod-shaped microglia into an amoeboid morphology on the scratched area of a PDL/laminin-coated surface also induced the up-regulation of Adam9 and Ctss gene expression. The expression of Adam9 and Ctss remained unchanged on non-scratched PDL/laminin-coated culture dishes that primarily contained amoeboid microglia after LPS treatment. Taken together, the results of the present study indicate a close association between laminin and morphological changes in microglia.

Results

Laminin-coated surface stabilizes trains of bipolar/rod-shaped microglia alignments in vitro

Our previous study showed that microglia form trains of bipolar/rod-shaped microglia alignments and become stabilized on the scratched area of a PDL/laminin-coated surface after 6 days in vitro (DIV) (Fig. 1a)5. Therefore, we examined whether a physical scratch alone is sufficient to promote the alignment of bipolar/rod-shaped microglia grown on culture dishes without PDL/laminin-coating. Interestingly, we observed bipolar/rod-shaped microglia trains in the scratched area at 2 DIV (Fig. 1b, as indicated with yellow arrowheads). However, the microglia alignment was unstable and disappeared after 3 DIV when these microglia became indistinguishable from the microglia in the non-scratched area, which displayed randomized morphologies with non-directional alignment (Fig. 1b). These data showed that physical scratch alone induced the formation of bipolar/rod-shaped microglia trains, but failed to maintain a stable directional microglia alignment. In contrast, laminin might play a role in stabilizing the microglia alignment because bipolar/rod-shaped microglia trains could be maintained for at least 6 DIV5.

Figure 1. Laminin stabilizes the bipolar/rod-shaped microglia alignment.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

(a) Bipolar/rod-shaped and amoeboid microglia were colonized in the scratched (left to the line) and non-scratched areas, respectively, of a PDL/laminin-coated surface. Green: CD11b; Blue: DAPI. (b) Bipolar/rod-shaped microglia (yellow arrowheads) trains were unstably formed on the scratched area (area within the two dotted lines) of the culture plate without PDL/laminin-coating before 3 DIV. Scale bars: 50 μm in a; 250 μm in b.

Bipolar/rod-shaped microglia alignments form in the laminin-free scratched area

Bipolar/rod-shaped microglia colonize only on the scratched area of a PDL/laminin-coated surface5, while physical scratches alone did not maintain stable directional bipolar/rod-shaped microglia trains (Fig. 1). We therefore hypothesized that both physical scratch and laminin coating are required to stabilize directional bipolar/rod-shaped microglia trains. We first examined the laminin distribution on the PDL/laminin-coated surfaces after scratches using an anti-laminin antibody. The scratches generated using a P200 pipette tip completely removed the laminin coating and produced a laminin-free area between non-scratched areas (Fig. 2). These data indicated that the sandwiching of microglia between laminin-coated surfaces facilitates the formation of bipolar/rod-shaped microglia alignments.

Figure 2. Physical scratch removes the laminin coating and generates a laminin-free area.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Scratching was performed using a P200 pipette tip. Most, if not all, of the laminin coating was removed in the scratched area. The area between the two white dotted lines corresponds to the laminin-free areas generated through physical scratches (areas in black colour, left panel). Laminin was evenly distributed in the non-scratched areas (areas in green colour, middle panel). The negative control was obtained without the addition of the anti-laminin primary antibody (right panel). Scale bar: 500 μm.

Amoeboid microglia digest the laminin substrate and up-regulate the expression of laminin-cleaving proteins

We further investigated the potential role of laminin and physical scratching in regulating the morphological changes of microglia in vitro. Interestingly, we observed noticeable small laminin-free zones around amoeboid microglia in the non-scratched area (Fig. 3, white arrowheads). It is likely that the amoeboid microglia digested the laminin coating since amoeboid microglia phagocytose both non-oxidized and oxidized laminin26. To investigate the potential association between laminin-cleaving proteins and the morphology of microglia, we performed an enrichment analysis using the Gene Ontology (GO) database (amigo.geneontology.org). We identified 28 mouse genes using the search term “laminin binding” (GO: 0043236). After further literature research, we found that 5 of the 28 genes were expressed in microglia, and only Adam9 and Ctss were closely associated with laminin-cleaving activity. We therefore examined whether the degradation of laminin by amoeboid microglia is associated with the expression of two laminin-cleaving genes, Adam9 and Ctss27,28, which are both expressed in microglia29,30,31. As expected, we observed that the mRNA levels of Adam9 and Ctss were remarkably up-regulated in amoeboid microglia compared with bipolar/rod-shaped microglia at 2 DIV (Fig. 4a). At 6 DIV, both Adam9 and Ctss remained significantly up-regulated in amoeboid microglia (Fig. 4b). To further validate the mRNA expression data, we examined the protein expression of ADAM9 and CTSS in bipolar/rod-shaped and amoeboid microglia. Consistent with the qPCR analysis, the protein expression of both ADAM9 and CTSS was significantly higher in amoeboid microglia than in bipolar/rod-shaped microglia at 2 DIV (Fig. 4c) and 6 DIV (Fig. 4d), respectively. These data collectively indicated that amoeboid microglia have higher laminin-cleaving activity compared with bipolar/rod-shaped microglia, and bipolar/rod-shaped microglia primarily colonized in the laminin-free scratched area.

Figure 3. Amoeboid microglia digest the laminin coating, leaving laminin-free zones around the cells.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Amoeboid microglia (white arrowheads) digested the surrounding laminin on non-scratched areas of the PDL/laminin-coated surface, leaving some laminin-free zones. The bipolar/rod-shaped microglia colonized only on the scratched area. Scale bar: 100 μm.

Figure 4. mRNA and protein expression of Adam9 and Ctss are significantly increased in amoeboid microglia.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

(a) A significant increase in the mRNA expression of Adam9 and Ctss was observed in amoeboid-enriched cultures compared with bipolar/rod-enriched cultures at 2 DIV (n = 6). (b) At 6 DIV, the mRNA expression of Adam9 and Ctss remained significantly increased in amoeboid-enriched cultures (n = 4). *P < 0.05, Student’s t-test. (c) Representative fluorescence micrographs showed strong Adam9 and Ctss immunoreactivity in amoeboid microglia (white arrowheads) compared with bipolar/rod-shaped microglia (yellow arrowheads). The quantification of the fluorescence intensity of Adam9 and Ctss confirmed the immunostaining results at 2 DIV. (d) Representative fluorescence micrographs showed that the protein expression of Adam9 and Ctss remained high in amoeboid microglia (white arrowheads) compared with bipolar/rod-shaped microglia (yellow arrowheads). The quantification of Adam9 and Ctss fluorescence intensity confirmed the observation at 6 DIV. Scale bar: 100 μm. We analysed approximately 600–1000 bipolar/rod-shaped or amoeboid microglia from scratched or non-scratched PDL/laminin-coated surface, respectively (n = 3; mean ± SEM; *P < 0.05, one-way ANOVA, followed by Bonferroni’s post hoc test).

LPS-induced transformation of bipolar/rod-shaped microglia into amoeboid microglia increases the expression of Adam9 and Ctss

LPS induced the activation of microglia and transformation into an amoeboid morphology in our cell culture model system5. The microglia were cultured on scratched (bipolar/rod-enriched cultures) or non-scratched (amoeboid-enriched cultures) PDL/laminin-coated culture dishes for 6 days. The formation of bipolar/rod-shaped microglia trains was observed only in the scratched area. At 6 DIV, LPS or PBS was added to the microglia cultures. LPS induced the rapid transformation from bipolar/rod-shaped microglia into the amoeboid morphology within 30 minutes (Fig. 5a), and the amoeboid microglia remained in the amoeboid morphology on non-scratched plates at 6 hours after LPS treatment, as shown in our previous study5. To further define the potential link between laminin-cleaving proteins and morphological changes in microglia, we quantified the mRNA expression of Adam9 and Ctss in bipolar/rod- and amoeboid-enriched cultures after treatment with PBS or LPS using qPCR analysis. In bipolar/rod-enriched cultures, the Adam9 and Ctss expression significantly increased at 6 hours after LPS treatment compared with that in the PBS controls (Fig. 5b), whereas the expression of Adam9 and Ctss in LPS-treated amoeboid-enriched cultures remained unchanged (Fig. 5c). These results indicate that amoeboid microglia regained laminin cleavage activity through the up-regulation of laminin-cleaving gene expression after the transformation from the bipolar/rod-shaped morphology. More importantly, LPS did not induce the up-regulation of laminin-cleaving proteins in amoeboid-enriched cultures. Taken together, our data showed that the alteration of Adam9 and Ctss expression levels are well correlated with the morphological changes of microglia.

Figure 5. Elevated mRNA expression of Adam9 and Ctss in amoeboid microglia that transformed from bipolar/rod-shape microglia after LPS treatment.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

(a) LPS-treated bipolar/rod-shaped microglia transformed into amoeboid microglia in 30 minutes and maintained this morphology for a few hours. (b) LPS induced an increased in mRNA expression of Adam9 and Ctss in the amoeboid microglia transformed from bipolar/rod-shaped microglia at 6 hours after culture on scratched PDL/laminin-coated culture dishes (n = 4). (c) LPS did not induce any change in the mRNA expression of Adam9 and Ctss in amoeboid microglia at 6 hours after culture on non-scratched PDL/laminin-coated culture dishes (n = 4). *P < 0.05, Student’s t-test.

Discussion

Accumulating evidence suggests a crucial role for microglia in the repair and regeneration of the CNS after injury. Different morphological forms of microglia play distinctive roles during CNS damage and repair. Ramified microglia actively survey the nearby territory using motile processes7. Once ramified microglia detect changes in the neuronal microenvironment, such as damage or pathogen invasion, these cells are induced and transformed into amoeboid forms to perform active phagocytosis and take up the clearance roles32. Recently, the importance of bipolar/rod-shaped microglia in CNS repair has attracted extensive attention in glial cell research5,9,10,11,16. In the present study, we attempted to explore the association between laminin and microglia morphology using an in vitro cell culture model system. Our data suggested that in the absence of laminin, bipolar/rod-shaped microglia were still able to form trains of alignments within the first two days on the scratched surface, but these alignments rapidly disappeared. Scratching the PDL/laminin-coated surface removed most, if not all, of the laminin coating within the scratched area, where bipolar/rod-shaped microglia were colonized. Two laminin-cleaving proteins, Adam9 and Ctss, showed distinct gene and protein expression profiles in bipolar/rod- and amoeboid-enriched microglia cultures. Adam9 and Ctss were up-regulated in both amoeboid-enriched microglia cultures (non-scratched PDL/laminin-coated surface), and amoeboid microglia transformed from bipolar/rod-shaped microglia after LPS treatment. An immunostaining study clearly demonstrated that amoeboid microglia exhibited strong Adam9 and Ctss immunoreactivity in bipolar/rod-shaped microglia. These studies suggested that the morphological changes of microglia are highly versatile and dynamic.

ECM proteins modulate microglia morphology in different cellular contexts33,34,35. We and others have demonstrated that laminin maintains amoeboid-shaped microglia in vitro4,5. In the present study, we observed that amoeboid microglia expressed higher levels of Adam9 and Ctss and digested the surrounding laminin substrate. It is likely that laminin provides a substrate not only for attachment but also for consumption by these cells to sustain an amoeboid morphology. Trains of bipolar/rod-shaped microglia were transiently formed (disappeared after 3 DIV) in scratched areas without a PDL/laminin coating and subsequently, the microglia adopted randomized morphologies (Fig. 1b). We speculated that scratching might generate many tiny grooves on the surface that provide physical guidance for the formation of directional alignments. We also demonstrated that scratching the PDL/laminin-coated culture dishes removed the laminin in the scratched areas, while the laminin remained intact in the non-scratched areas (Fig. 2). These laminin and laminin-free streaks might form a laminin gradient across the surface, which could be important in maintaining the stable directional alignment of bipolar/rod-shaped microglia. In our previous study, live-cell imaging showed that microglia were attracted to the edges of the scratches on a laminin-coated surface11. We therefore proposed that microglia could sense differences in the laminin concentration at the boundaries between scratched and non-scratched areas to maintain bipolar/rod-shaped microglia trains (summarized in Fig. 6).

Figure 6. Schematic diagram illustrating the association between laminin and microglia morphology.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

Trains of bipolar/rod shaped microglia could not be maintained and stabilized on scratched culture dishes without a PDL/laminin coating. The scratched area of a PDL/laminin-coated surface supports stable bipolar/rod-shaped microglia trains. Adam9 and Ctss up-regulation in both amoeboid-enriched and amoeboid microglia that were transformed from bipolar/rod shaped microglia is likely associated with laminin degradation and cell motility.

After traumatic or ischaemic brain injury, bipolar/rod-shaped microglia trains immediately form, and microglia alignments can be maintained for 1–2 weeks9,10,16,17. These bipolar/rod-shaped microglia trains have been proposed to be important in CNS repair, particularly in neuronal circuit reorganization9,10. Other studies have shown that laminin primarily increases and accumulates at the site of injury in areas with blood vessels, astrocytes and neurons during the first week after injury19,21,23,36. The up-regulation of laminin could be tightly associated with the angiogenesis, wound healing and axonal regrowth of damaged neurons after CNS injury21,37. In vitro studies have shown that laminin drives growth cone development, leading to the acceleration of axonal outgrowth38, and it enhances the regenerative capacity of CNS and PNS neurons24,25, thereby masking the inhibitory effect of CNS myelin39. Nevertheless, additional studies are needed to determine whether the localization of bipolar/rod-shaped microglia is directly associated with the spatiotemporal expression profiling of laminin after CNS injury. The in vivo CNS microenvironment would make it far too complicated and technically challenging to examine the role of individual ECM proteins in the formation of bipolar/rod-shaped microglia trains. Our culture system provides a platform for characterizing bipolar/rod-shaped microglia in vitro.

During the formation of bipolar/rod-shaped microglia trains, we observed the significant down-regulation of two laminin-cleaving genes, Adam9 and Ctss (Fig. 4). Adam9 (MDC-9/meltrin-γ) is a member of the a disintegrin and metalloproteinase family and is a functional ligand of α6β1 integrin40. The secreted form of alternatively spliced Adam9 binds to α6β4 integrin, and the complex exhibits laminin-cleaving activity27. Ctss is a member of the lysosomal cysteine protease family, which degrades laminin28,41,42. In the present study, LPS induced the transformation of bipolar/rod-shaped microglia into the amoeboid morphology accompanied by the up-regulation of Adam9 and Ctss. This finding indicates that the morphological changes in microglia are highly associated with the expression of laminin-cleaving proteins, given the fact that these amoeboid microglia transformed from bipolar/rod-shaped microglia, which had initially colonized in the laminin-free scratched area. We therefore proposed that bipolar/rod-shaped microglia are less capable of degrading laminin than amoeboid microglia. A recent study showed that the alignment of bipolar/rod-shaped microglia did not co-localize with other glial cells, such as oligodendrocytes, and activated astrocytes10, which actively produced laminin after brain injury19,23. Instead, bipolar/rod-shaped microglia trains became aligned parallel to adjacent axons10. We therefore hypothesized that bipolar/rod-shaped microglia align at the injury site where the laminin concentration is relatively low. Such spatiotemporal alignment of bipolar/rod-shaped microglia might be beneficial since this form of microglia could prevent the degradation of laminin through the down-regulation of Adam9 and Ctss, resulting in a growth-permissive microenvironment at the injury site that would facilitate the regeneration of damaged axons. In addition, previous studies have shown that the degradation of laminin disrupts the cell-laminin interaction, leading to the apoptosis of hippocampal neurons43,44. Bipolar/rod-shaped microglia trains are formed in close proximity to axons/dendrites of injured neurons10. The suppression of laminin-degradation machinery in bipolar/rod-shaped microglia could maintain cell-laminin integrity, which prevents damaged neurons from undergoing apoptosis.

The up-regulation of laminin-cleaving proteins with increased laminin degradation by amoeboid microglia, as observed in the present study, might be associated with the motility and function of these cells. In general, the focal degradation of ECM proteins facilitates cell migration, as shown in different types of cells45,46. The elevated expression of Adam9 is observed in metastatic cancer cells with high motility47. The alternatively spliced form of Adam9 secreted from hepatic stromal cells actively degrades laminin27, followed by an increase in cell motility27,40. The ablation of Ctss impairs microglia migration, as indicated by the number of microglia that infiltrated axotomized facial motor nerves in mutant mice29. These findings suggest that the changes in Adam9 and Ctss expression would also influence cell motility. In the present study, the elevated mRNA expression of Adam9 and Ctss detected in amoeboid microglia was consistent with previous studies suggesting that microglia with this morphology are highly motile in nature and rapidly migrate towards the site of injury in response to the signals released from damaged cells after injury48. However, bipolar/rod-shaped microglia tend to form stable end-to-end alignments at the site of injury9,10,16; therefore, these cells are comparatively less motile. The differential expression of Adam9 and Ctss might indicate that the cell motility in different forms of microglia is associated with the functional activities of these cells.

Taken together, the elucidation of the mechanisms underlying the regulation of the transformation into amoeboid microglia and the reversal to bipolar/rod-shaped or ramified microglia will be of great interest in designing therapeutic strategies for treating different forms of CNS injury. Further investigation of the association between the formation of bipolar/rod-shaped microglia alignment and the laminin expression levels at the injury site in animal models of CNS injury will shed new light on the roles of bipolar/rod-shaped microglia in CNS repair.

Methods

Animals

All experiments were conducted according to the protocols approved by the Animal Research Ethics Sub-Committee in City University of Hong Kong (Ref. A-0017) in compliance with the American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA) Guidelines on Euthanasia that suggest exposure to carbon dioxide for animal euthanasia. C57BL/6 mice at postnatal days 1 to 3 were used for all in vitro experiments. The animals were provided with food and water ad libitum, with a 12 h light-dark cycle. We made the very best efforts to reduce the number of animals used.

Primary microglia culture and bipolar/rod-shaped microglia enrichment

Primary microglia purification and bipolar/rod-shaped-enriched culture were performed as previously described5,49. Briefly, cerebral cortices dissected from C57BL/6 mice at postnatal days 1 to 3 were subjected to trypsinization and mechanical dissociation. For each batch of primary microglia cell preparation, we used 8 to 10 cerebral cortices for one T75 flask. Therefore, the cortices were obtained from at least 2 litters or more depending on the litter size (usually 8 pups per litter). The experiments were conducted using microglia from 2 to 3 T75 flasks. We repeated the experiments at least three times from three different batches of separately prepared microglia to obtain high reproducibility and representative data. The cell suspension was plated onto a PDL (10 μg/ml)-coated T75 flask and maintained in DMEM/10% FBS supplemented with 5 ng/ml macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF, Peprotech #315-05). After 12–14 days, the suspended and loosely attached microglial cells were collected from the culture medium after gentle shaking of the T75 flask on an orbital shaker for 15–20 minutes. The purity of the microglia obtained from the mixed primary cortical cultures was 99%, as determined by immunostaining using antibodies against a classical microglial marker, anti-IBA1 (019–19741, Wako) as previously described5,49 (Supplementary Fig. S1). The primary mixed cortical cultures were used for two rounds of microglia purification (shaking off) and maintained in culture for up to 14 days in T75 flasks. Thirty-five mm culture dishes or 8-well culture chamber slides were coated with PDL (10 μg/ml), followed by laminin (10 μg/ml, Sigma L2020). In total, 80,000 and 10,000 cells were seeded onto one 35-mm culture dish and each well of 8-well culture chamber slides, respectively. Amoeboid microglia were enriched after the primary microglia were grown on non-scratched PDL/laminin-coated culture dishes. Bipolar/rod-shaped microglia were enriched after primary microglia were seeded on scratched PDL/laminin-coated culture dishes. Multiple scratches were made on the PDL/laminin-coated culture dishes using P200 pipette tips. Purified microglia cultures were maintained for 2 to 6 days as indicated, depending on the experimental conditions.

Immunostaining

Cultured microglia were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde at room temperature for 15 minutes, blocked with 0.5% bovine serum albumin/0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS and stained with anti-laminin (Ab11575, Abcam), anti-CD11b (MCA74G, Serotec), anti-IBA1 (019–19741, Wako), anti-Adam9 (AF949, R&D System), and anti-Ctss (sc-271619, Santa Cruz) antibodies overnight at 4 °C. After being washed with PBS, the cultures were incubated with secondary antibodies conjugated to Alexa Fluor (Invitrogen) at room temperature for one hour. The nuclei were subsequently counterstained with DAPI.

RNA extraction, reverse transcription and qPCR

RNA extraction, reverse transcription and qPCR analysis were performed as previously described5. Briefly, total RNA was extracted from the amoeboid and bipolar/rod-shaped microglia-enriched cultures using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen). Reverse transcription was performed using Superscript III First-Strand Synthesis SuperMix (Invitrogen). Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) was performed in triplicate using the KAPA SYBR Fast qPCR Kit (KAPA) on an ABI-7500 FAST Real-time PCR system. Relative fold changes were calculated using the 2−ΔΔCt formula. Gapdh was used an endogenous control for normalization. The qPCR primer sequences are listed in Table 1.

Table 1. qPCR primers used in this study.

Gene Primer sequence (5′ to 3′)
Gapdh Forward: CATGGCCTTCCGTGTTCCTA
Reverse: CCTGCTTCACCACCTTCTTGAT
Adam9 Forward: GTCATCCAGGCCCAAGGAAA
Reverse: TGGTCAGAGAGTAGGGAGCC
Ctss Forward: GGAGTGAGCACCACACTTCA
Reverse: TCCCAATGGTAGTCCAGGGT
Open in a new tab

LPS treatment

LPS (Sigma L4516) was added to the amoeboid-enriched or bipolar/rod-enriched microglia cultures (final concentration of 10 μg/ml) at 6 DIV and subsequently incubated for 6 hours5. PBS was used as a control. Total RNA was extracted from the microglia for qPCR analysis.

Fluorescence intensity quantification

Sixteen non-overlapping images of microglia immunostained with anti-ADAM9 or anti-CTSS antibodies were obtained using a Nikon Eclipse Ni-E microscope equipped with a motorized stage and a 20 × objective. The contours of the microglia (i.e., IBA1+ve) were manually outlined and selected as the region of interest (ROI) using an ImageJ plugin. The fluorescence intensity of Adam9 and Ctss within each ROI representing a single microglia was quantified using ImageJ. The microglia from each condition were also immunostained simultaneously, and the samples were imaged with identical settings under the same magnification, gain level and exposure time. Microglia images were obtained and quantified from at least three separate experiments. We analysed approximately 600–1000 bipolar/rod-shaped or amoeboid microglia from scratched or non-scratched PDL/laminin-coating surfaces, respectively, and a representative image was selected.

Statistical analyses

GraphPad Prism 5.0 software was used for the statistical analyses. All data are presented as the means ± SEM. Student’s t-test (2 groups) or one-way ANOVA with post-hoc Bonferroni analysis (more than 2 groups) were used for comparisons where appropriate, with P < 0.05 considered statistically significant.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Tam, W. Y. et al. The association between laminin and microglial morphology in vitro. Sci. Rep. 6, 28580; doi: 10.1038/srep28580 (2016).

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Information
srep28580-s1.pdf (17.2MB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

This work is supported in part by The Health and Medical Research Fund (HMRF), Food and Health Bureau, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Government (Ref. Nos 01122016, 01122026, and 12134101) and ECS/GRF grants from the Research Grant Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Government (CityU 161212, CityU 160813, and CityU 11100015) award to Chi Ma.

Footnotes

Author Contributions W.Y.T. and N.P.B.A. performed the experiments and data analysis. W.Y.T. and C.H.E.M. designed the experiments. W.Y.T., N.P.B.A. and C.H.E.M. wrote the manuscript.

References

  1. Stence N., Waite M. & Dailey M. E. Dynamics of microglial activation: a confocal time-lapse analysis in hippocampal slices. Glia 33, 256–266 (2001). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Suzumura A., Marunouchi T. & Yamamoto H. Morphological transformation of microglia in vitro. Brain Res 545, 301–306 (1991). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Szabo M. & Gulya K. Development of the microglial phenotype in culture. Neuroscience 241, 280–295 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chamak B. & Mallat M. Fibronectin and laminin regulate the in vitro differentiation of microglial cells. Neuroscience 45, 513–527 (1991). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Tam W. Y. & Ma C. H. Bipolar/rod-shaped microglia are proliferating microglia with distinct M1/M2 phenotypes. Sci Rep 4, 7279 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hanisch U. K. & Kettenmann H. Microglia: active sensor and versatile effector cells in the normal and pathologic brain. Nat Neurosci 10, 1387–1394 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Nimmerjahn A., Kirchhoff F. & Helmchen F. Resting microglial cells are highly dynamic surveillants of brain parenchyma in vivo. Science 308, 1314–1318 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Schlegelmilch T., Henke K. & Peri F. Microglia in the developing brain: from immunity to behaviour. Curr Opin Neurobiol 21, 5–10 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Taylor S. E., Morganti-Kossmann C., Lifshitz J. & Ziebell J. M. Rod microglia: a morphological definition. PloS one 9, e97096 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ziebell J. M., Taylor S. E., Cao T., Harrison J. L. & Lifshitz J. Rod microglia: elongation, alignment, and coupling to form trains across the somatosensory cortex after experimental diffuse brain injury. J Neuroinflammation 9, 247 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Zhan X., Kim C. & Sharp F. R. Very brief focal ischemia simulating transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) can injure brain and induce Hsp70 protein. Brain Res 1234, 183–197 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Amat J. A., Ishiguro H., Nakamura K. & Norton W. T. Phenotypic diversity and kinetics of proliferating microglia and astrocytes following cortical stab wounds. Glia 16, 368–382 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Wierzba-Bobrowicz T. et al. Morphological analysis of active microglia–rod and ramified microglia in human brains affected by some neurological diseases (SSPE, Alzheimer’s disease and Wilson’s disease). Folia Neuropathol 40, 125–131 (2002). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Denes A. et al. Proliferating resident microglia after focal cerebral ischaemia in mice. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 27, 1941–1953 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lalancette-Hebert M., Gowing G., Simard A., Weng Y. C. & Kriz J. Selective ablation of proliferating microglial cells exacerbates ischemic injury in the brain. J Neurosci 27, 2596–2605 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Yuan T. F., Liang Y. X., Peng B., Lin B. & So K. F. Local proliferation is the main source of rod microglia after optic nerve transection. Sci Rep 5, 10788 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. de Hoz R. et al. Rod-like microglia are restricted to eyes with laser-induced ocular hypertension but absent from the microglial changes in the contralateral untreated eye. PloS one 8, e83733 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lang B. T. et al. Pleiotropic molecules in axon regeneration and neuroinflammation. Exp Neurol 258, 17–23 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Liesi P., Kaakkola S., Dahl D. & Vaheri A. Laminin is induced in astrocytes of adult brain by injury. EMBO J 3, 683–686 (1984). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Silver J. & Miller J. H. Regeneration beyond the glial scar. Nat Rev Neurosci 5, 146–156 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Ji K. & Tsirka S. E. Inflammation modulates expression of laminin in the central nervous system following ischemic injury. J Neuroinflammation 9, 159 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Rolls A. et al. Two faces of chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan in spinal cord repair: a role in microglia/macrophage activation. PLoS Med 5, e171 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Tate C. C., Tate M. C. & LaPlaca M. C. Fibronectin and laminin increase in the mouse brain after controlled cortical impact injury. J Neurotrauma 24, 226–230 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Lein P. J., Banker G. A. & Higgins D. Laminin selectively enhances axonal growth and accelerates the development of polarity by hippocampal neurons in culture. Brain Res Dev Brain Res 69, 191–197 (1992). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Manthorpe M. et al. Laminin promotes neuritic regeneration from cultured peripheral and central neurons. J Cell Biol 97, 1882–1890 (1983). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Stolzing A., Wengner A. & Grune T. Degradation of oxidized extracellular proteins by microglia. Arch Biochem Biophys 400, 171–179 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Mazzocca A. et al. A secreted form of ADAM9 promotes carcinoma invasion through tumor-stromal interactions. Cancer Res 65, 4728–4738 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Wang B. et al. Cathepsin S controls angiogenesis and tumor growth via matrix-derived angiogenic factors. J Biol Chem 281, 6020–6029 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Hao H. P., Doh-Ura K. & Nakanishi H. Impairment of microglial responses to facial nerve axotomy in cathepsin S-deficient mice. J Neurosci Res 85, 2196–2206 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Nuttall R. K. et al. Metalloproteinases are enriched in microglia compared with leukocytes and they regulate cytokine levels in activated microglia. Glia 55, 516–526 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Clark A. K., Wodarski R., Guida F., Sasso O. & Malcangio M. Cathepsin S release from primary cultured microglia is regulated by the P2X7 receptor. Glia 58, 1710–1726 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Ladeby R. et al. Microglial cell population dynamics in the injured adult central nervous system. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 48, 196–206 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Bohatschek M., Kloss C. U., Kalla R. & Raivich G. In vitro model of microglial deramification: ramified microglia transform into amoeboid phagocytes following addition of brain cell membranes to microglia-astrocyte cocultures. J Neurosci Res 64, 508–522 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Hanisch U. K. Functional diversity of microglia - how heterogeneous are they to begin with? Front Cell Neurosci 7, 65 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Milner R. & Campbell I. L. The extracellular matrix and cytokines regulate microglial integrin expression and activation. J Immunol 170, 3850–3858 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Stichel C. C. & Muller H. W. Relationship between injury-induced astrogliosis, laminin expression and axonal sprouting in the adult rat brain. J Neurocytol 23, 615–630 (1994). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. McKeon R. J., Hoke A. & Silver J. Injury-induced proteoglycans inhibit the potential for laminin-mediated axon growth on astrocytic scars. Exp Neurol 136, 32–43 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Kuhn T. B., Schmidt M. F. & Kater S. B. Laminin and fibronectin guideposts signal sustained but opposite effects to passing growth cones. Neuron 14, 275–285 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. David S., Braun P. E., Jackson D. L., Kottis V. & McKerracher L. Laminin overrides the inhibitory effects of peripheral nervous system and central nervous system myelin-derived inhibitors of neurite growth. J Neurosci Res 42, 594–602 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Nath D. et al. Meltrin gamma(ADAM-9) mediates cellular adhesion through alpha(6)beta(1)integrin, leading to a marked induction of fibroblast cell motility. J Cell Sci 113(Pt 12), 2319–2328 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Liuzzo J. P., Petanceska S. S., Moscatelli D. & Devi L. A. Inflammatory mediators regulate cathepsin S in macrophages and microglia: A role in attenuating heparan sulfate interactions. Mol Med 5, 320–333 (1999). [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Petanceska S., Canoll P. & Devi L. A. Expression of rat cathepsin S in phagocytic cells. J Biol Chem 271, 4403–4409 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Chen Z. L. & Strickland S. Neuronal death in the hippocampus is promoted by plasmin-catalyzed degradation of laminin. Cell 91, 917–925 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Gu Z. et al. A highly specific inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase-9 rescues laminin from proteolysis and neurons from apoptosis in transient focal cerebral ischemia. J Neurosci 25, 6401–6408 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Lu P., Takai K., Weaver V. M. & Werb Z. Extracellular matrix degradation and remodeling in development and disease. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 3 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Lu P., Weaver V. M. & Werb Z. The extracellular matrix: a dynamic niche in cancer progression. J Cell Biol 196, 395–406 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Arribas J., Bech-Serra J. J. & Santiago-Josefat B. ADAMs, cell migration and cancer. Cancer Metastasis Rev 25, 57–68 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Loane D. J. & Byrnes K. R. Role of microglia in neurotrauma. Neurotherapeutics 7, 366–377 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Griffin R. S. et al. Complement induction in spinal cord microglia results in anaphylatoxin C5a-mediated pain hypersensitivity. J Neurosci 27, 8699–8708 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information
srep28580-s1.pdf (17.2MB, pdf)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES