Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2016 Jun 30;6:29065. doi: 10.1038/srep29065

A dinuclear ruthenium(II) complex as turn-on luminescent probe for hypochlorous acid and its application for in vivo imaging

Zonglun Liu 1, Kuo Gao 2, Beng Wang 1, Hui Yan 1, Panfei Xing 1, Chongmin Zhong 1, Yongqian Xu 1, Hongjuan Li 1, Jianxin Chen 2,a, Wei Wang 2, Shiguo Sun 1,c
PMCID: PMC4928191  PMID: 27356618

Abstract

A dinuclear ruthenium(II) complex Ruazo was designed and synthesized, in which oxidative cyclization of the azo and o-amino group was employed for the detection of hypochlorous acid (HClO) in aqueous solution. The non-emissive Ruazo formed highly luminescent triazole-ruthenium(II) complex in presence of HClO and successfully imaged HClO in living cell and living mouse.


Reactive nitrogen species (RNS) and reactive oxygen species (ROS) mediate a wide variety of biological events like aging1, pathogen response2 and immunity3. ROS, such as HClO, H2O2, OH, 1O2 and O2•−, being produced and/or eliminated in biological systems, play important roles in diverse normal biochemical functions and abnormal pathological processes4,5. Among them, HClO, generated from H2O2 and Cl by secreted myeloperoxidase (MPO) catalyzed in response to inflammatory stimuli in vivo6,7, plays a crucial role in the innate immune system. However, deregulation of HClO levels is implicated with many pathophysiological consequences including cardiovascular diseases, rheumatoid arthritis, and cancer8. Furthermore, it is reported that HClO may cause lysosomal rupture9, mitochondrial permeabilization10, proteinase inactivation11,12 and cell death through calcium dependent calpain10. Therefore, methods for sensitive and selective detection of hypochlorous acid/hypochlorite are of considerable significance for both disease diagnosis and exploration of its diverse pathophysiology13,14,15.

Several analytical methods such as HPLC16, electrochemical detection17, electrophoresis18, ultraviolet spectrophotometry18 and fluorescent probes19,20 have been used for the detection of hypochlorous acid. Among these reported methods, fluorescent probes are extensively employed for HClO detection and imaging in vitro and in vivo owing to their distinct advantages21. Recently, transition metal complexes have attracted a great of interest in the field of luminescent probes and cellular chemosensors due to their desirable chemical and photophysical properties, such as good water solubility, high chemical and photostability, intense polarized luminescence, visible-light absorption and emission, large Stokes shifts, long lifetimes and low cytotoxicity22,23,24,25. Among these transition metal complexes, ruthenium(II) complexes with three diimine ligands, such as 2,2′-bipyridine (bpy), 1,10-phenanthroline (phen), and bathophenanthroline derivatives are one type of potential candidates for environmental and biological HClO probing. Some ruthenium(II) complex based luminescent probes for hypochlorous acid have been developed25,26,27,28,29,30,31. These probes were generally designed based on the conjugation of the ruthenium complex with a HClO recognizing moiety, such as nitrophenyl derivatives26,27,28, phenothiazine30, ferrocene31 and oxime derivatives25. Recently, we found that the azo with an o-amino group could also be a candidate moiety for the recognition of HClO. As far as we know, there is no luminescence probe based on an azo-o-amino ruthenium(II) complex reported for the detection of HClO in aqueous solution32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43.

It is noted that the mononuclear ruthenium complex RuMAZO can detect Cu2+ without interference of HClO in HEPES (4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid) buffer (Figure S1)44. Interestingly, this reaction could also be triggered by HClO in PBS (phosphate) buffer. However, the RuMAZO exhibited a relative low sensitivity to HClO and the reaction can be somehow interfered by Cu2+ (Figure S2b, S3). In our previous work45,46, a series of bimetallic ruthenium complexes were developed and some synergistic enhancing effect can be reached by the co-existing two ruthenium moieties, which can be quite helpful to solve the above mentioned problem. To continue our research and figure out this, another ruthenium moiety was introduced by incorporating the azo-phenanthroline derivative ligand into the ruthenium(II)-1,10-phenanthroline complex, to design a more sensitive and selective HClO probe and eliminate the interference of Cu2+. As shown in Fig. 1, the almost non-emissive dinuclear ruthenium(II) complex Ruazo formed highly luminescent product triazole-ruthenium(II) complex Rutazo in presence of hypochlorous acid with an oxidative cyclization of the azo and amino group in the dinuclear ruthenium(II) complex, which can detect HClO without interference of Cu2+ in the PBS buffer (Figure S2, S4), and showed highly sensitive and selective luminescent responses towards HClO without interferences of other ROS/RNS. Based on these features, we use this probe to investigate its luminescence response behavior towards exogenous HClO in living cells and living mouse successfully.

Figure 1. Molecular structures of RuMAZO and Ruazo.

Figure 1

The proposed mechanism of the probe towards hypochlorous acid.

Results

Firstly, the dynamics luminescence response of the probe to HClO was investigated in a PBS buffer (10 mM, pH 7.4) at room temperature. After the addition of HClO to the solution of Ruazo (10 μM), luminescence enhancement was clearly evident up in 3 min (Figure S5), then no further significant changes occurred, which suggests that the optimal reaction time for HClO detection for this probe is around 3 min. Thus, all of the UV–vis absorption and luminescence properties were investigated under the same conditions. As shown in Figure S6, the probe showed typical absorption spectra of the ruthenium(II)-1,10-phenanthroline complexes. The absorption band at 263 nm of the complexes is dominated by the π−π* transition of the ligands. While the absorption bands in the visible region (445 nm, 456 nm) are attributed to the metal-to-ligand charge transfer (MLCT) transitions for ruthenium(II) complexes. After reacting with HClO, the absorption between 490 nm and 550 nm caused by the absorption of phen-AZO ligand in the probe disappeared, the ligand absorption around 263 nm decreased at the same time.

To investigate the sensitivity, selectivity of Ruazo to HClO, luminescence of the probe was measured with various concentrations of HClO. As shown in Fig. 2a, the emission intensity of Ruazo without HClO was negligible. With the addition of HClO from 0 to 80 μM, the emission intensity at 600 nm increased to over 50 folds upon excitation at 465 nm. Moreover, the logarithm of the luminescence intensity followed a good linear relationship with the concentration of HClO over the range of 0.5–50 μM (Figure S7) and the limit of detection (LOD) for HClO was determined to be 4.37 × 10−7 M.

Figure 2. The Luminescence studies of Ruazo towards HClO.

Figure 2

(a) Luminescence intensity of Ruazo (10 μM) with various concentrations of NaClO (0, 0.5, 3, 7, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100 μM) in a PBS buffer (10 mM, pH 7.4). (b) Luminescence changes of Ruazo (10 μM) upon the addition of various ROS (100 μM) or RNS (100 μM) in a PBS buffer (10 mM, pH 7.4).

The specificity measurement of Ruazo with HClO was also investigated in 10 mM phosphate buffer of pH 7.4. As shown in Fig. 2b, after treated with various ROS and RNS (100 μM), the changes of the emission intensity of Ruazo (10 μM) were negligible in the presence of other ROS/RNS, such as H2O2, OH, NO, O2•−, TBHP, TBO and 1O2. Whereas the emission of Ruazo treated with HClO (100 μM) resulted in highly luminescent signals. As potential interfering factors for specific detection of HClO, some common cations (100 μM), anions (100 μM) or amino acids (100 μM) were also examined under the same conditions (Figure S8). As expected, no obvious emission intensity changes were observed upon the additions of other cations, anions or amino acids. All of these demonstrated that the probe is highly specific for the detection of HClO.

Furthermore, the influence of pH on the emission intensities of the probe Ruazo and its titration with HClO was examined under different pH value (Figure S9). Neither the probe nor its reaction mixture with HClO had obvious signal changes over the pH range of 5–9. These results confirmed that the luminescence of Ruazo and its reaction with HClO were essentially pH-insensitive in the pH range of 5–9 and expected to work well under physiological conditions.

Discussion

The mechanism of Ruazo in HClO detection was investigated. The UV–vis absorption changes after the addition of HClO indicated the structure change in Ruazo (Figure S6). All these were attributed to the oxidative cyclization of the quencher azo and amino group converted into luminescent benzotriazole by HClO, which was confirmed by ESI-MS and 1H NMR (Figure S10, 11).

The practical applicability of Ruazo for imaging HClO was investigated in living cells. HeLa cells were incubated with Ruazo (10 μM) exhibited not any obvious luminescence (Figure S12b). However, the cells incubated with HClO (50 μM) showed red luminescence (Figure S12e). The luminescence images at different concentrations of HClO (0, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60 μM) were also taken. As shown in Figure S13, the luminescence intensity enhanced with the increasing concentration of HClO. The results revealed that Ruazo can be used as an off-on luminescent probe for sensing HClO in living cells. The cytotoxicity of Ruazo to the HeLa cell lines was investigated with an MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) assay after a 24 h treatment. The result showed that Ruazo exhibited no obvious cytotoxicity to the cells (Figure S14). Finally, luminescence imaging in mouse model was evaluated by taking advantages of excellent behavior of Ruazo towards HClO. As the control, the mice were given hypodermic injections of 10 nmol Ruazo (100 μL in a PBS buffer solution (10 mM, pH 7.4)) or a PBS buffer solution (100 μL, 10 mM, pH 7.4) into right backs respectively. Then, 80 nmol HClO in solution (50 μL) was injected subcutaneously after 5 min. Pictures were taken under the imaging system after the HClO were incubated for 0, 5, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 and 60 min, respectively. As shown in Fig. 3, luminescence intensities of the region with Ruazo and HClO injected became stronger and stranger within 60 min. While almost no emission signals exhibited in the control group injected with Ruazo or PBS buffer alone. Thus, Ruazo is able to detect HClO through luminescent signal in vivo. Taken together, Ruazo can be a desired imaging agent for visualizing HClO in vivo.

Figure 3. The luminescence images of live mice.

Figure 3

Mice were given a subcutaneous injection of (a) PBS buffer (100 μL, 10 mM, pH 7.4), (b) 10 nmol Ruazo (100 μL in a PBS buffer (10 mM, pH 7.4)), (c–j) 10 nmol Ruazo (100 μL in a PBS buffer (10 mM, pH 7.4)) and then 80 nmol HClO in solution (50 μL) after 0, 5, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 and 60 min, respectively.

In summary, a water-soluble dinuclear ruthenium(II) complex was developed as a luminescent probe for the detection of HClO. The weakly luminescent Ruazo can specifically and sensitively react with HClO in aqueous media and exhibit highly luminescence signal after the oxidative cyclization of the azo and o-amino group in the probe. Luminescent imaging detections for HClO were successfully achieved in living mouse. This hypochlorous acid induced oxidative cyclization reaction can be employed as a new route for HClO detection.

Methods

All chemical reagents were purchased from commercial suppliers and used as received. All the organic solvents were analytical grade. Deionized water was used for all the measurements. 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker 500 AVANCE III spectrometer with chemical shifts reported in ppm at room temperature (500 MHz for 1H NMR and 125 MHz for 13C NMR, Germany). Mass spectra were obtained with Thermo Fisher LCQ Fleet mass spectrometer (USA) or a LC/Q-Tof MS spectrometry (USA).

All spectrographic measurements were performed in 10 mM PBS buffer (pH 7.4). The pH of the testing systems was determined by a PHS-3C pH Meter (China). Absorption spectra were measured with a Shimadzu UV-1750 UV-vis spectrometer (Japan). Luminescence spectra were collected by using a Shimadzu RF-5301 fluorescence spectrometer (Japan). The mouse imaging experiment was conducted by Kodak in-vivo imaging system FX Pro (USA). Images of Hela cells were performed on an Olympus FV1000 confocal microscope (Japan).

All of the experiments were performed in compliance with the relevant laws and institutional guidelines, and were approved by Northwest A&F University.

The concentration determination and/or preparation of HClO and other reactive oxygen species (H2O2, OH, NO, O2•−, 1O2, TBO, TBHP) were made according to the literature47,48.

The synthetic route of Ruazo is shown in Figure S15. 5-amino-1, 10-phenanthroline is prepared according to the literature previously reported49. The azo-phenanthroline ligand was prepared through the coupling reaction of 5-amino-1,10-phenanthroline with its diazonium salt. The ruthenium(II) complex was obtained in a satisfactory yield (85%) through direct reaction of the azo-phenanthroline ligand with the appropriate molar ratios of cis-[Ru(phen)2Cl2] in ethanol.

Phen-AZO

5-amino-1, 10-phenanthroline (195 mg, 1.0 mmol) was dissolved in 1.5 mL concentrated hydrochloric acid, then 4.0 mL cold solution of NaNO2 (69 mg, 1.0 mmol) was added. After stirred for 1 h under 0 °C, the mixture was added drop wise to 18.0 mL 5-amino-1, 10-phenanthroline (195 mg, 1.0 mmol) acetate buffer (1.5 g sodium acetate and 3.0 mL acetate) in 30 min. After the addition was completed, the mixture was stirred for 2 days. Then ammonia aqueous was added to this mixture to adjust to pH = 7 and then filtered, washed with pure water, purified by column chromatography on silica gel with CH2Cl2/CH3OH. Deep red solid was obtained, dried under vacuum with a yield of 308 mg, 77%. 1H NMR (500 MHz, TFA-d): δ (ppm) 10.18 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 10.01 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 9.58 (d, J = 4.0 Hz, 1H), 9.45 (t, J = 6.5 Hz, 2H), 9.39 (d, J = 4.5 Hz, 1H), 9.25 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 9.09 (d, J = 5.5 Hz, 1H), 8.75 (s, 1H), 8.60 (dd, J = 8.5, 5.0 Hz, 1H), 8.49 (dd, J = 8.5, 5.5 Hz, 1H), 8.39 (dd, J = 8.5, 5.5 Hz, 1H), 8.23 (dd, J = 8.5, 4.5 Hz, 1H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, TFA-d): δ (ppm) 152.48, 148.69, 147.92, 146.97, 145.53, 142.19, 140.99, 140.92, 139.09, 138.90, 135.82, 133.64, 133.41, 132.57, 132.17, 130.87, 129.19, 127.01, 126.85, 126.06, 123.99, 122.83. ESI-MS: [M+H]+, calculated for [C24H16N7], 402.14, found: 402.13.

Ruazo

cis-[Ru(phen)2Cl2]•2H2O (228 mg, 0.4 mmol) and phen-AZO (81 mg, 0.2 mmol) were dissolved in 30 mL ethanol, then the mixture was protected with nitrogen and refluxed for 12 h. The mixture was concentrated under reduced to about 2 mL. The residue was dropped to NH4PF6 solution and stirred for 30 min. Red precipitate was filtered and washed with cold water, dried under vacuum. Yield: 324 mg, 85%. 1H NMR (500 MHz, Acetone-d6): δ (ppm) 9.53 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 9.40 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 9.24 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 8.91 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 8.87–8.77 (m, 9H), 8.63–8.59 (m, 1H), 8.59–8.56 (m, 1H), 8.56–8.50 (m, 4H), 8.47–8.41 (m, 12H), 8.39 (dd, J = 5.0, 1.1 Hz, 1H), 8.14 (d, J = 4.5 Hz, 1H), 7.96–7.79 (m, 11H), 7.73 (dd, J = 8.5, 5.0 Hz, 1H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, Acetone-d6): δ (ppm) 154.99, 153.56, 153.34, 153.12, 152.97, 149.48, 148.86, 148.10, 143.25, 138.30, 137.02, 133.30, 133.06, 131.17, 130.96, 128.51, 128.24, 127.07, 126.47, 126.33, 126.26, 125.84, 113.02. HRMS: [M-2PF6]2+, calculated for [C72H47F12N15P2Ru2], 807.5749, found: 807.5754.

Rutazo

Ruazo (48 mg, 0.025 mmol) was dissolved in 10 mL acetonitrile and water (2/3, V/V), then sodium hypochlorite solution (0.25 mmol) was dropped to the mixture. Then the mixture was stirred for 5 min, concentrated and purified by chromatography to get red orange solid 41 mg, 86%. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CD3CN) δ (ppm) 9.41–9.31 (m, 2H), 9.08 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 3H), 8.81 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 8.70–8.62 (m, 8H), 8.35–8.25 (m, 7H), 8.24–8.17 (m, 5H), 8.14–8.09 (m, 3H), 8.08–8.01 (m, 4H), 7.80–7.63 (m, 12H). ESI-MS: [M-2PF6]2+, calculated for [C72H45F12N15P2Ru2], 806.56, found: 806.47.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Liu, Z. et al. A dinuclear ruthenium(II) complex as turn-on luminescent probe for hypochlorous acid and its application for in vivo imaging. Sci. Rep. 6, 29065; doi: 10.1038/srep29065 (2016).

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Information
srep29065-s1.pdf (924.2KB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the Scientific Research Foundation of Northwest A&F University (Z111021103 and Z111021107), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21472016, 21272030 and 21476185), State Key Laboratory of Chemo/Biosensing and Chemometrics, Hunan University (No. 2013005).

Footnotes

Author Contributions S.G.S. supervised and interpreted the research. Z.L.L. performed the measurements and wrote the manuscript. K.G., B.W. and H.Y. performed mouse imaging and P.F.X. performed the cells imaging. C.M.Z., Y.Q.X., H.J.L., J.X.C. and W.W. helped with interpreted data and wrote the manuscript. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.

References

  1. Lambeth J. D. Nox enzymes, ROS, and chronic disease: an example of antagonistic pleiotropy. Free Radical Biol. Med. 43, 332–347 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Branzk N. et al. Neutrophils sense microbe size and selectively release neutrophil extracellular traps in response to large pathogens. Nat. Immunol. 15, 1017–1025 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chan J., Dodani S. C. & Chang C. J. Reaction-based small-molecule fluorescent probes for chemoselective bioimaging. Nat. Chem. 4, 973–984 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Behrend L., Henderson G. & Zwacka R. Reactive oxygen species in oncogenic transformation. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 31, 1441–1444 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Beneš L., Ďuračková Z. & Ferenčik M. Chemistry, physiology and pathology of free radicals. Life Sci. 65, 1865–1874 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Winterbourn C. C., Hampton M. B., Livesey J. H. & Kettle A. J. Modeling the reactions of superoxide and myeloperoxidase in the neutrophil phagosome implications for microbial killing. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 39860–39869 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Klebanoff S. J. Myeloperoxidase: friend and foe. J. Leukoc. Biol. 77, 598–625 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Tang Y. et al. Development of fluorescent probes based on protection-deprotection of the key functional groups for biological imaging. Chem. Soc. Rev. 44, 5003–5015 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Yap Y. W. et al. Hypochlorous acid induces apoptosis of cultured cortical neurons through activation of calpains and rupture of lysosomes. J. Neurochem. 98, 1597–1609 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Yang Y.-t. T., Whiteman M. & Gieseg S. P. HOCl causes necrotic cell death in human monocyte derived macrophages through calcium dependent calpain activation. BBA-Mol. Cell Res. 1823, 420–429 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Wang Y. et al. Hypochlorous acid generated by neutrophils inactivates ADAMTS13: an oxidative mechanism for regulating ADAMTS13 proteolytic activity during inflammation. J. Biol. Chem. 290, 1422–1431 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Liu W. Q. et al. Myeloperoxidase-derived hypochlorous acid promotes ox-LDL-induced senescence of endothelial cells through a mechanism involving beta-catenin signaling in hyperlipidemia. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 467, 859–865 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Koide Y., Urano Y., Hanaoka K., Terai T. & Nagano T. Development of an Si-rhodamine-based far-red to near-infrared fluorescence probe selective for hypochlorous acid and its applications for biological imaging. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 5680–5682 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Xu Q. et al. Development of imidazoline-2-thiones based two-photon fluorescence probes for imaging hypochlorite generation in a co-culture system. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 54, 4890–4894 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Bekdeser B., Durusoy N., Ozyurek M., Guclu K. & Apak R. Optimization of microwave-assisted extraction of polyphenols from herbal teas and evaluation of their in vitro hypochlorous acid scavenging activity. J. Agric. Food. Chem. 62, 11109–11115 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Gatto M. T. et al. Development of a new assay for the screening of hypochlorous acid scavengers based on reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. Biomed. Chromatogr. 16, 404–411 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Murata M. et al. Electrochemical detection of free chlorine at highly boron-doped diamond electrodes. J. Electroanal. Chem. 612, 29–36 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  18. Weiss S. J., Klein R., Slivka A. & Wei M. Chlorination of taurine by human neutrophils: evidence for hypochlorous acid generation. J. Clin. Invest. 70, 598–607 (1982). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lou Z., Li P. & Han K. Redox-Responsive Fluorescent Probes with Different Design Strategies. Acc. Chem. Res. 48, 1358–1368 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kowada T., Maeda H. & Kikuchi K. BODIPY-based probes for the fluorescence imaging of biomolecules in living cells. Chem. Soc. Rev. 44, 4953–4972 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Yuan L., Lin W., Zheng K., He L. & Huang W. Far-red to near infrared analyte-responsive fluorescent probes based on organic fluorophore platforms for fluorescence imaging. Chem. Soc. Rev. 42, 622–661 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Balzani V., Bergamini G., Marchioni F. & Ceroni P. Ru(II)-bipyridine complexes in supramolecular systems, devices and machines. Coord. Chem. Rev. 250, 1254–1266 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  23. Fernandez-Moreira V., Thorp-Greenwood F. L. & Coogan M. P. Application of d6 transition metal complexes in fluorescence cell imaging. Chem. Commun. 46, 186–202 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Lo K. K.-W., Choi A. W.-T. & Law W. H.-T. Applications of luminescent inorganic and organometallic transition metal complexes as biomolecular and cellular probes. Dalton Trans. 41, 6021–6047 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Li M. et al. Oximated ruthenium tris-bipyridyl complex: synthesis and luminescent response specifically for ClO(-) in water containing multiple ions. Dalton Trans. 44, 14071–14076 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Zhang R. et al. Highly sensitive and selective phosphorescent chemosensors for hypochlorous acid based on ruthenium(II) complexes. Biosens. Bioelectron. 50, 1–7 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Ye Z. et al. Development of a functional ruthenium(II) complex for probing hypochlorous acid in living cells. Dalton Trans. 43, 8414–8420 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Zhang R. et al. Development of a ruthenium(II) complex-based luminescent probe for hypochlorous acid in living cells. Inorg. Chem. 52, 10325–10331 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Yu X., Zhang W., Ye Z., Song B. & Yuan J. Development of a Functional Ruthenium(II) Complex that Can Act as a Photoluminescent and Electrochemiluminescent Dual-signaling Probe for Hypochlorous Acid. J. Fluoresc. 25, 997–1004 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Liu F., Gao Y., Wang J. & Sun S. Reversible and selective luminescent determination of ClO(-)/H2S redox cycle in vitro and in vivo based on a ruthenium trisbipyridyl probe. Analyst 139, 3324–3329 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Cao L. et al. A ruthenium(II) complex-based lysosome-targetable multisignal chemosensor for in vivo detection of hypochlorous acid. Biomaterials 68, 21–31 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Zhu H., Fan J., Wang J., Mu H. & Peng X. An “enhanced PET”-based fluorescent probe with ultrasensitivity for imaging basal and elesclomol-induced HClO in cancer cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 12820–12823 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Panda S., Panda A. & Zade S. S. Organoselenium compounds as fluorescent probes. Coord. Chem. Rev. 300, 86–100 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  34. Sun Y. Q. et al. Rhodamine-inspired far-red to near-infrared dyes and their application as fluorescence probes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 51, 7634–7636 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Cheng X. et al. A “turn-on” fluorescent probe for hypochlorous acid: convenient synthesis, good sensing performance, and a new design strategy by the removal of C = N isomerization. Chem. Commun. 47, 11978–11980 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Huo F.-J. et al. A fluorescein-based highly specific colorimetric and fluorescent probe for hypochlorites in aqueous solution and its application in tap water. Sens. Actuators, B 166–167, 44–49 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  37. Cheng G. et al. A near-infrared fluorescent probe for selective detection of HClO based on Se-sensitized aggregation of heptamethine cyanine dye. Chem. Commun. 50, 1018–1020 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Emrullahoglu M., Ucuncu M. & Karakus E. A BODIPY aldoxime-based chemodosimeter for highly selective and rapid detection of hypochlorous acid. Chem. Commun. 49, 7836–7838 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Shu W. et al. A novel visual and far-red fluorescent dual-channel probe for the rapid and sensitive detection of hypochlorite in aqueous solution and living cells. Sens. Actuators, B 221, 1130–1136 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  40. Xiong K. et al. A highly selective fluorescent bioimaging probe for hypochlorite based on 1,8-naphthalimide derivative. Sens. Actuators, B 221, 1508–1514 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  41. Xu Q. et al. A highly specific fluorescent probe for hypochlorous acid and its application in imaging microbe-induced HOCl production. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 9944–9949 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Yuan L. et al. Development of targetable two-photon fluorescent probes to image hypochlorous Acid in mitochondria and lysosome in live cell and inflamed mouse model. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 5930–5938 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Zhao J. et al. A specific and rapid “on-off” acenaphthenequinone-based probe for HOCl detection and imaging in living cells. New J. Chem. 38, 3371–3374 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  44. Zhang Y. et al. A ruthenium(II) complex as turn-on Cu(II) luminescent sensor based on oxidative cyclization mechanism and its application in vivo. Sci. Rep. 5, 8172 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Sun S. et al. Synthesis and ECL performance of highly efficient bimetallic ruthenium tris-bipyridyl complexes. Dalton Trans. 41, 12434–12438 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Sun S. et al. Study of highly efficient bimetallic ruthenium tris-bipyridyl ecl labels for coreactant system. Anal. Chem. 81, 10227–10231 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Chen G. et al. FRET spectral unmixing: a ratiometric fluorescent nanoprobe for hypochlorite. Chem. Commun. 48, 2949–2951 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Li X. et al. 4, 5-Dimethylthio-4′-[2-(9-anthryloxy) ethylthio] tetrathiafulvalene, a highly selective and sensitive chemiluminescence probe for singlet oxygen. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 11543–11548 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Ji S. et al. A Highly Selective OFF-ON Red-Emitting Phosphorescent Thiol Probe with Large Stokes Shift and Long Luminescent Lifetime. Org. Lett. 12, 2876–2879 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information
srep29065-s1.pdf (924.2KB, pdf)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES