Abstract
To understand how Toll signaling controls the activation of a cellular immune response in Drosophila blood cells (hemocytes), we carried out a genetic modifier screen, looking for deletions that suppress or enhance the mobilization of sessile hemocytes by the gain-of-function mutation Toll10b (Tl10b). Here we describe the results from chromosome arm 3R, where five regions strongly suppressed this phenotype. We identified the specific genes immune response deficient 1 (ird1), headcase (hdc) and possibly Rab23 as suppressors, and we studied the role of ird1 in more detail. An ird1 null mutant and a mutant that truncates the N-terminal kinase domain of the encoded Ird1 protein affected the Tl10b phenotype, unlike mutations that affect the C-terminal part of the protein. The ird1 null mutant suppressed mobilization of sessile hemocytes, but enhanced other Tl10b hemocyte phenotypes, like the formation of melanotic nodules and the increased number of circulating hemocytes. ird1 mutants also had blood cell phenotypes on their own. They lacked crystal cells and showed aberrant formation of lamellocytes. ird1 mutant plasmatocytes had a reduced ability to spread on an artificial substrate by forming protrusions, which may explain why they did not go into circulation in response to Toll signaling. The effect of the ird1 mutation depended mainly on ird1 expression in hemocytes, but ird1-dependent effects in other tissues may contribute. Specifically, the Toll receptor was translocated from the cell membrane to intracellular vesicles in the fat body of the ird1 mutant, and Toll signaling was activated in that tissue, partially explaining the Tl10b-like phenotype. As ird1 is otherwise known to control vesicular transport, we conclude that the vesicular transport system may be of particular importance during an immune response.
Introduction
The core components of the Toll signaling pathway were initially identified in a classical genetic screen for mutations that affect Drosophila embryonic development, where Toll signaling was found to control dorsal-ventral polarity [1–3]. Later, the Toll pathway was also shown to activate a set of genes that code for antimicrobial peptides in Drosophila [4,5]. These peptides are effectors of the humoral arm of the phylogenetically highly conserved defense system of innate immunity (reviewed in [6,7]), serving as a first line of defense after infection in all higher organisms. The Toll pathway is named after the Toll gene, which encodes a transmembrane receptor. This receptor, Toll, interacts with the products of the Myd88, pelle, tube and cactus genes to activate two NF-κB-like transcription factors, encoded by the dorsal and Dif genes [8,9]. Together with a second NF-κB-like signaling pathway, the Imd pathway [5], the Toll pathway plays a major role in the induction of the humoral immune response in Drosophila (reviewed in [8,10,11]). Toll homologs were later identified in the mouse as well as in humans [12,13], where Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are crucial for activating and coordinating both innate and acquired immunity.
Genetic screens that target the immune response directly have later helped to identify additional genes that affect Toll and Imd signaling. One of them is the immune response deficient 1 (ird1) gene, which was found by Wu et al. [14] in an ethyl methanesulfonate screen for mutations that suppress the Imd-dependent induction by bacteria of the antibacterial peptide Diptericin. In contrast to the impaired induction of Diptericin and several other Imd pathway-dependent antimicrobial peptides, homozygous ird1 mutants showed constitutive expression of another antimicrobial peptide gene, Drosomycin [15], a target of both Toll and Imd signaling. This suggested that the Toll pathway is activated in ird1 mutants. In support of this conclusion, Wu et al. also observed spontaneous formation of melanotic nodules in ird1 null mutants [14]. This is a well-known phenotype for Toll gain-of-function mutants such as Tl10b [16,17].
The ird1 gene encodes a homolog of the yeast protein Vacuolar protein sorting 15 (Vps15) [15], a serine/threonine kinase with WD40 domains, which acts as a regulatory subunit of the class III phosphoinositide 3-kinase Vps34, also known in Drosophila as Pi3K59F. Together with Atg6 (Beclin 1) and Uvrag (Vps38) or Atg14 they form a PI 3-kinase complex that is involved in vesicle fusion events during phagocytosis, autophagy and endocytosis [18]. How a mutation in the PI 3-kinase complex affects the induction of antimicrobial peptide synthesis is unknown (See Ref. [19]).
While the humoral antimicrobial immune response is now well understood in Drosophila [9–11,20], less is known at the molecular level about the other arm of Drosophila innate immunity, the cellular immune defense [21,22]. This defense is mediated by blood cells, called hemocytes, which participate in the phagocytosis of microbes and the encapsulation of parasites [23]. Three classes of hemocytes are morphologically distinguishable in Drosophila: plasmatocytes, crystal cells and lamellocytes. The phagocytically active plasmatocytes constitute the major class, about 95% of the circulating hemocyte population in unchallenged larvae. There is also a large population of sessile plasmatocytes, many of which decorate the inside of the epidermis. The crystal cells contribute the remaining 5% and they are involved in the melanization of wounds and perhaps also of parasites [24]. Lamellocytes, the third class, are big flat cells that encapsulate parasites and foreign objects. They only appear in circulation during parasite infection or after other major challenges, when they can constitute up to 50% of the hemocytes. For instance, when a Drosophila larva is infected with eggs of a parasitoid wasp like Leptopilina boulardi, sessile plasmatocytes go into circulation and a subset of the plasmatocytes differentiate to become lamellocytes [25–28]. Larval hemocytes originate directly from a group of embryonic hemocytes, whereas many pupal and adult hemocytes are formed in a separate hematopoietic tissue, the so-called “lymph glands” that release their content of hemocytes at the larva-to-pupa metamorphosis [29]. A parasite infection can also lead to lamellocyte formation in the lymph glands, which then release their contents prematurely.
Several signaling pathways can cause release of sessile hemocytes and formation of lamellocytes [16,17,30], thus mimicking the response to parasite infection. This phenotype is for instance seen in the Toll10b (Tl10b) mutant, in which the Toll pathway is constitutively activated. This effect is cell non-autonomous and mainly dependent on Toll activity in the fat body, not in hemocytes [31]. To identify genes that are involved in Toll-mediated hemocyte activation, we have now set up a genetic modifier screen for genes that affect the Toll10b hemocyte phenotype. Here we report results for chromosome arm 3R, and we show that mutations in the ird1 gene suppress normal hemocyte mobilization, but enhance many other aspects of hemocyte activation.
Results and Discussion
A genetic modifier screen
The phenotype of a dominant mutant, such as the gain-of function Toll mutant Tl10b [32], can be used as a starting point to screen for mutations that modify this phenotype, either enhance or suppress it. We initiated such a modifier screen, to identify yet unknown components involved in Toll-dependent blood cell activation. In this way we expected to find genes involved in intercellular interactions between blood cells or between other tissues like the fat body and blood cells, as well as cell-autonomously acting genes. For this purpose we crossed Tl10b flies with flies from the DrosDel collection of isogenized deletion mutants (“deficiencies”) [33], or with additional deficiencies from the Exelixis collection [34], in order to achieve higher coverage for genomic regions of particular interest. With a limited number of genetic crosses this approach makes it possible to screen the major part of the Drosophila genome for the effect of a 50% reduction of gene dosage.
As readout for hemocyte activation we chose to score the Toll-dependent mobilization of the segmental stripes of sessile hemocytes under the epidermis of undisturbed larvae. To visualize these cells in vivo, we introduced a UAS-GFP fluorescent construct, together with the hemocyte-specific driver HmlΔ-GAL4, into our Tl10b stock (called Hml>GFP; Tl10b). Here we describe results for the right arm of the third chromosome, one fifth of the genome, which is covered to about 90% in our screen.
Results of the deletion screen
We assayed the mobilization of activated hemocytes by scoring the disruption of the bands of sessile hemocytes on an arbitrary scale from 1 to 4 (Fig 1A), as described previously [31,35]. For each genotype we calculated a mobilization index (MI), defined as the average score of several individual larvae. Comparing the scores for all positive and negative control crosses during the course of this study, we found significantly higher (p<0.0001, chi-square test) mobilization indices for the Tl10b crosses (mean MI = 3.21), compared to the wild-type controls (mean MI = 1.66), and there was little overlap between the scores of these cohorts (Fig 1B; S1 Table). The mobilization indices of all examined deficiency crosses form a broad distribution between these values. Of the 88 deficiencies tested, 13 overlapped with the wild-type phenotype and hence were categorized as strong suppressors. In addition, 17 deficiencies fell in the interval between the positive and negative controls and were classified as weak suppressors (Fig 1B and S1 Table). Due to the strong phenotype of the Tl10b mutant in this genetic background, it was difficult to identify enhancers. However, given that Tl10b is homozygous lethal [32], the ten deficiencies that failed to produce any offspring when crossed to Hml>GFP; Tl10b could be regarded as potential enhancers (S1 Table).
All together, the strong suppressor deficiencies defined five minimal genomic regions of overlap (highlighted in red in Fig 1C), each harboring between 5 and 90 genes (Table 1). Notably, these regions did not include any of the classical Toll pathway genes of this chromosome arm: tube, spätzle, pelle or Toll. We concluded that a 50% reduced gene dosage of these genes was not sufficient to suppress the Tl10b phenotype we investigated. Using a candidate gene approach, testing mutants and RNAi constructs of selected genes from these regions (for details, see S1 Text and S1 Fig), we identified two genes that affected the Tl10b phenotype: Rab23 in region 1 (S1A and S1B Fig) and immune response deficient 1 (ird1) in region 2 (S1C and S1D Fig, see also further description below). Regions 3–5 were not further analyzed. Region 3 was problematic, as it overlapped with two larger non-suppressor deficiencies. Region 4 with 24 genes and region 5 with 90 genes were too large to be analyzed with our present phenotypic assays and they will require further mapping with additional deletions, which were not available at the time (Table 1). We did however investigate one weak suppressor deficiency Df(3R)ED6332 with just four genes, and identified one of them, headcase (hdc), as a true suppressor (Fig 1C, S2 Fig). We will here focus on the role of ird1 gene in Toll-dependent hemocyte activation.
Table 1. Suppressor regions.
Sup-pressor regions | Location on 3R (bp) | Genes in the region (tested genes in bold) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1480524–1510301 | elm | |||||
MED27 | |||||||
CG2182 | |||||||
CR44093 | |||||||
CG1109 | |||||||
Xe7 | |||||||
Atg17 | |||||||
Rab23 | |||||||
2 | 5055517–5073219 | pum | |||||
CR45196 | |||||||
D1 | |||||||
ird1 | |||||||
CG8420 | |||||||
3 a | 8545707–8821397 | CR44231 | CG10126 | CG14384 | |||
CG5724 | CR44235 | CG7381 | |||||
CG5999 | d-cup | CG7091 | |||||
beat-Vc | CR33929 | Paip2 | |||||
CR44233 | CG10909 | CG31342 | |||||
CR44232 | beat-Vb | CG14383 | |||||
CG31345 | CR44236 | yellow-f | |||||
beat-Va | grsm | yellow-f2 | |||||
CR45587 | Spc25 | CG7488 | |||||
CR44234 | Cyp304a1 | ||||||
4 | 12879384–12974829 | Dad | CG17477 | TwdlW | |||
Ns1 | CR44238 | m-cup | |||||
mRpS11 | CG31269 | ||||||
Keap1 | CG31265 | ||||||
kuk | CG17475 | ||||||
GckIII | CG4053 | ||||||
cal1 | CG31266 | ||||||
cher | CG31267 | ||||||
CG34278 | CG5246 | ||||||
CG42779 | CG5255 | ||||||
CG45079 | CG5265 | ||||||
5 | 21832109–22624758 | E(spl)mα-BFM | Vps2 | CG31323 | CG5432 | scrib | Tb |
Kaz-m1 | Dak1 | CG31086 | CG6503 | CR44951 | TwdlQ | ||
CR45040 | Sld5 | CG6073 | CG34291 | TwdlM | amon | ||
E(spl)m2-BFM | CG14543 | CG34130 | CR31084 | TwdlP | CG6425 | ||
CR43643 | CG42498 | CG34129 | CR43434 | TwdlB | CG5484 | ||
CR43644 | CG14550 | CR44320 | tx | TwdlL | CG6420 | ||
E(spl)m3-HLH | RpL34a | CG12290 | Hex-t1 | TwdlO | CG14244 | ||
E(spl)m4-BFM | CG14544 | CR42745 | Hex-t2 | TwdlK | CG14246 | ||
E(spl)m5-HLH | CG14551 | Ald | CG5447 | TwdlJ | CG14245 | ||
E(spl)m6-BFM | CR44950 | CR44321 | CG43117 | TwdlN | CG6403 | ||
E(spl)m7-HLH | dys | CG6154 | TwdlH | CG14247 | |||
E(spl)m8-HLH | CR44319 | CG33970 | CG14237 | TwdlR | CR45562 | ||
gro | CG31324 | CR42765 | CG14238 | TwdlS | CR45563 | ||
Exo84 | CG14556 | CG6036 | CG5455 | TwdlD | CG42789 | ||
CR45226 | CG6142 | ppk15 | plum | beat-VII | CG42790 | ||
6 b | 26103647–26215013 | hdc | |||||
CG34300 | |||||||
Fer1HCH | |||||||
Fer2LCH |
a Region covered by both suppressive and non-suppressive deletions
b Weak suppressor region
Mutations in the kinase domain of ird1 suppress Tl10b-induced hemocyte mobilization, but enhance melanotic nodulation
To confirm the role of ird1 in modifying the Tl10b hemocyte phenotype, we tested the deletion mutant ird1Δvps15, created by Lindmo et al. [36], and found that even as heterozygote it is a strong suppressor of hemocyte mobilization when crossed to Hml>GFP; Tl10b (Fig 2A and 2B). We also analyzed five point mutants, ird11-ird15, created by Wu et al. [14,15]. Except for ird14, they are all nonsense mutants, predicted to encode truncated proteins (Fig 2D), and all five fail to complement the lethality of the original ird1 mutant allele [14,15]. However we only could mimic the effect of the ird1Δvps15 deletion with the ird15 mutant, which significantly suppressed the Tl10b phenotype (Fig 2A and 2B). Notably, ird15 is also the only allele that disrupts the kinase domain, whereas the other point mutations affect the C-terminal half of the Ird1 protein, disrupting or completely deleting the conserved WD40 repeats (Fig 2D). We conclude that the WD40 repeat region is mostly dispensable for the Tl10b hemocyte phenotype we assayed. Of the three splice forms annotated for ird1 in FlyBase [37], two encode truncated isoforms where the WD40 region is missing (Fig 2D). This suggests that such truncated Ird1 protein variants may also have a biological function in vivo, a function that would be insensitive to loss of the WD40 repeats.
Wu et al. [14,15] demonstrated that Toll signaling is constitutively activated in ird1 homozygous mutants, activating both humoral and cellular immunity. We were therefore surprised to see that the kinase domain mutants ird1Δvps15 and ird15 suppressed Toll-dependent hemocyte mobilization. On the other hand, the same mutant alleles and to a lesser extent ird12, enhanced the Tl10b-induced formation of melanotic nodules (Fig 2C).
Suppression of ird1 expression in hemocytes is sufficient to modify the Tl10b phenotype
We have previously shown that the effect of Tl10b on hemocyte activation depends primarily on activated Toll signaling in the fat body, not in the hemocytes [31]. When we suppressed Toll signaling in hemocytes, the Tl10b hemocyte phenotype was even enhanced. In order to understand the role of the ird1 gene in this context, we examined in which tissue ird1 exerts its effect on the Tl10b phenotype. We first tested the role of ird1 in hemocytes, by crossing an ird1 RNAi transgene (UAS-ird1IR [38]) into the Hml>GFP; Tl10b stock. Like with the ird1Δvps15 and ird15 mutants, this increased the percentage of larval offspring with nodules, compared to the Tl10b mutant alone (Fig 2C, S3A Fig), although the average mobilization index of sessile hemocytes was unaffected (Fig 2B). However, in individual larvae of this genotype the sessile hemocytes showed an interesting range of phenotypes. While some larvae looked almost like wild-type with broad and regular bands of sessile blood cells, other larvae showed either a much disturbed pattern or a general reduction in Hml>GFP expression (Fig 2A shows three examples). Even in the absence of the Tl10b mutation, the latter phenotype could be produced by blood cell-specific knockdown of ird1 (Fig 2E).
The interpretation of these effects is complicated by the fact that suppression of ird1 in hemocytes also affected the expression of the plasmatocyte-specific marker, i.e. the proportion of hemocytes that express Hml>GFP. This effect was clearly observed among circulating hemocytes, where ird1 suppression reduced the percentage of Hml>GFP-expressing cells (Fig 3A and quantified in S3B Fig), and in the lymph glands (Fig 3B). We therefore used the eater-DsRed marker to re-investigate the effect of suppressing ird1 in hemocytes. This marker was less strongly affected by ird1 suppression and visualized most or all plasmatocytes (Fig 3A). In this way we could confirm the rescue of the disrupted bands of the Tl10b phenotype by the ird1Δvps15 deletion mutant, and show that Hml-driven ird1 RNAi was alone sufficient to suppress this Tl10b phenotype (S3C Fig). Fig 3B also shows that Hml-driven expression of ird1IR rescued the morphology of the primary lymph gland, which was disrupted in the Tl10b mutant. To accurately quantify the rescue of the sessile hemocyte pattern we counted the number of eater-DsRed-positive hemocytes in the same single segment of each larva (Fig 3C, cf. S3C Fig), as well as the number of circulating hemocytes (Fig 3D). In agreement with our previous estimates with the mobilization index assay, Tl10b larvae had a significantly reduced number of eater-DsRed-positive hemocytes in the sessile compartment (compare Figs 2A and 2B and 3C). Not only was this mobilization of blood cells in Tl10b larvae reversed by a single copy of the ird1Δvps15 mutant, but the number of eater-DsRed-positive sessile hemocytes was even significantly increased compared to the wild-type control. This effect could also be mimicked by expression of ird1IR in hemocytes with the HmlΔ-GAL4 driver (Fig 3C, S3C Fig), confirming the role of ird1 for this Tl10b phenotype. Furthermore, suppression of ird1 expression in hemocytes significantly increased the number of blood cells in circulation of Tl10b larvae (Fig 3D), an effect that was not seen in ird1Δvps15 heterozygotes. Thus, the number of hemocytes was increased in both the sessile and the circulating compartments, suggesting a proliferative response.
We also investigated the effect of suppressing ird1 in hemocytes in the absence of the Tl10b mutation. This reduced the number of plasmatocytes in the sessile compartment by more than 40%, as detected with the eater-DsRed reporter, whereas the number of plasmatocytes in circulation almost doubled (Fig 3C and 3D). In transheterozygous ird15/ird1Δvps15 (ird1-/-) and larvae expressing ird1IR with two hemocyte drivers, HmlΔ-GAL4 and He-GAL4, the number of hemocytes in circulation was also significantly increased (S3D Fig), confirming our results with HmlΔ-GAL4 alone.
To test if ird1 activity in the fat body may also contribute to the blood cell phenotypes, we used the fat body-specific FB-GAL4 driver to express ird1IR, in a Tl10b or wild-type genetic background. This had no significant effect on the number of sessile cells or plasmatocytes in circulation in Tl10b animals (Fig 3C and 3D). However in Toll wild-type animals the number of sessile cells was reduced and there was also a corresponding increase in the circulating population, although the latter effect was not statistically significant. Combining the HmlΔ-GAL4 and FB-GAL4 drivers did not have a stronger effect than the HmlΔ-GAL4 driver alone (S3D Fig), giving further support to the notion that the ird1 gene product is not required in the fat body for the Toll-dependent blood cell phenotypes.
In conclusion, suppression of ird1 in hemocytes is sufficient to enhance melanotic nodule formation in Tl10b larvae to a similar extent as in ird1 mutants, and it also has a strong but more variable effect on the dispersal of sessile blood cells as well as hemocytes in the lymph gland and on the number of hemocytes in circulation. Thus, the hemocyte phenotypes of ird1 mutants in Tl10b larvae can largely be explained by the function of ird1 in the hemocytes themselves.
Loss of ird1 expression in hemocytes triggers lamellocyte formation, and this effect is enhanced by starvation
As fewer hemocytes expressed the Hml>GFP plasmatocyte marker when we suppressed ird1 expression, we thought that some plasmatocytes may have been triggered to develop into lamellocytes, like in the cellular immune response against parasitoid wasps [27,28]. The increased frequency of melanotic nodules seen in the Tl10b genetic background would also be consistent with such a response. To test this hypothesis directly we recombined two GAL4-independent hemocyte reporters into the same fly stock, MSNF9mo-mCherry (msn-Cherry) for lamellocytes [39] and eater-GFP for plasmatocytes [40]. In control animals, msn-Cherry was only expressed ectopically, mostly in parts of the musculature [31]. When we silenced ird1 expression in hemocytes with the HmlΔ-GAL4 or Cg-GAL4 drivers we observed msn-Cherry-positive hemocyte aggregates, some of them melanized, in many individuals (arrows in Fig 4A, lower panels; quantified in S4A Fig). The eater-GFP-labeled bands of sessile plasmatocytes were either interrupted or completely absent (arrowheads in Fig 4A, upper panel). These effects were very similar to the Toll gain-of-function phenotypes that could be observed with the same markers [31], except that the lymph glands were still intact after ird1 suppression (asterisks in Fig 4A, upper panel). In contrast, we saw no effect on hemocyte distribution when we suppressed ird1 in the fat body with the FB-GAL4 driver (Fig 4A), and few if any msn-Cherry-positive aggregates using this or a second fat body-specific driver, ppl-GAL4 (quantified in S4A Fig). We further studied the ird1 phenotype in ird15/ird1Δvps15 (ird1-/-) null mutant larvae. As previously reported by others [15], only few larvae of this genotype hatched. They were usually smaller in size, their hemocyte phenotypes were more severe, and they always died before the onset of pupariation. Such larvae never showed obvious eater-GFP expression in sessile blood cells or lymph glands (Fig 4A upper panel). In addition to msn-Cherry-positive nodules, some ird1-/- animals showed reporter expression in large paired structures located in the same relative position as the lymph glands visualized by eater-GFP in the other genotypes (see asterisks in Fig 4A upper and lower panels).
Suppression of ird1 with the HmlΔ-GAL4 driver reduced the intensity of eater-GFP expression also in the circulating plasmatocytes (Fig 4B, arrowheads), which were accompanied by large and flat msn-Cherry-positive cells with typical lamellocyte morphology, but showing no eater-GFP signal. This phenotype was also evident in blood samples from ird1-/- larvae, and when ird1 was suppressed in hemocytes and fat body with the Cg-GAL4 driver, but never when we suppressed ird1 in the fat body only using the FB-GAL4 driver. We conclude that specific loss of ird1 expression in hemocytes triggers lamellocyte differentiation. The fact that all hemocytes analyzed expressed at least one of the blood cell type-specific reporters indicates that they are all viable cells despite some of them having very irregular shapes.
We further confirmed the hemocyte identities in some of the tested genotypes by staining with plasmatocyte- and lamellocyte-specific antibodies [41–43]. All blood cells from wild-type control animals showed strong staining with the plasmatocyte-specific Nimrod C1 antibody P1, but this signal was almost absent in cells obtained from the ird1-/- mutant (S4B Fig) where they were largely replaced by large lamellocytes, as defined by the lamellocyte-specific Atilla antibody L1 (S4C Fig). A similar phenotype was seen in Tl10b animals, although the Tl10b lamellocytes were irregular in shape and more often retained eater-DsRed expression (arrowheads in S4C Fig). Although such double-positive cells were also found in hemolymph from ird1-/- larvae, most hemocytes were bigger and showed L1 staining only (arrow in S4C Fig).
We took the same approach to analyze the lymph glands of ird1-/-, Tl10b and Tl10b/ ird1Δvps15 heterozygotes. Unlike earlier studies [17,44], we were able to clearly identify areas of lamellocyte formation in the peripheral parts of the lymph glands from Tl10b animals, as identified with the L1 antibody (see structures next to arrows in Fig 4C). A similar L1 staining pattern was also seen in the Tl10b/ ird1Δvps15 heterozygotes, although the organs dissected from larvae of the latter genotype showed a more wild-type morphology (as seen by eater-DsRed expression and Hoechst staining in Fig 4C). This indicates that the rescue of the aberrant Tl10b lymph gland morphology by ird1 RNAi in hemocytes (Fig 3B) does not depend on blocked lamellocyte differentiation. Loss of ird1 was alone sufficient to induce lamellocyte formation, as shown in the ird1-/- lymph glands (Fig 4C). The latter were rather small, probably due to the retarded growth of these animals. Like in the circulating hemocytes, L1 antibody staining partially overlapped with eater-DsRed expression in Tl10b and Tl10b/ ird1Δvps15, but not in ird1-/- lymph glands (see merged images in Fig 4C).
The starvation-induced expression of the antimicrobial peptides Metchnikowin and Diptericin, but not Drosomycin, was previously shown to depend on ird1 [15]. To test if some of the blood cell-related phenotypes we had observed in ird1 null larvae were also modified by dietary restrictions, we collected early third instar ird1 null larvae showing only a single small msn-Cherry positive nodule and divided them into two groups. One group was kept on standard food, while the other was starved for 3 h as described [15]. Starved larvae showed bigger and more numerous msn-Cherry-positive nodules compared to fed animals (arrowheads in S4D Fig). No msn-Cherry positive nodules were observed in wild-type control larvae.
ird1 is needed for crystal cell formation and the melanization response against parasitoid wasps
In a ird15/ird1Δvps15 (ird1-/-) null mutant cross, about 60% of the larvae showed melanotic nodules, but when injected with an E. coli suspension they failed to show melanization at the wound site or on filter papers incubated together with the injured animal (S5A and S5B Fig). These results confirm earlier observations by Wu et al. [14], suggesting an impaired function of crystal cells in these animals. Melanin is a product of the phenoloxidase enzymes, and two out of the three phenoloxidase genes in Drosophila, PPO2 and PPO1, are specifically expressed in crystal cells. Both genes contribute to injury-mediated melanization, and PPO2 mutants lack recognizable crystal cells [24]. To test for the presence of crystal cells in the ird1 mutants, we visualized the crystal cells by heating the animals 10 min at 65°C [45]. As shown in Fig 5A, small black spots of homogeneous size corresponding to single crystal cells can be seen as in all wild-type control animals, mostly restricted to the middle of each larval segment (next to arrowheads and quantified in Fig 5A). In contrast, such spots were absent in ird1-/- larvae, although a few randomly localized discolorations could be seen, most likely corresponding to small nodules. Using the phenoloxidase-specific C1 antibody [46,47] to look for the presence of crystal cells in the circulating hemocyte population we could detect crystal cells in hemolymph of wild-type larvae, but never in samples collected from ird1-/- larvae (Fig 5B). Apart from being eater-DsRed negative, their crystal cell identity in the wild-type control was confirmed by the co-localization of C1 staining (arrows) with crystalline inclusions (arrowheads, Fig 5B). We conclude that no functional crystal cells, as defined by the presence of phenoloxidase, are formed in the absence of ird1.
To determine if ird1 suppression also affects melanization reactions in a more natural context, we infected second instar larvae with HmlΔ-GAL4-driven ird1IR with the parasitoid wasp Leptopilina boulardi. A successful encapsulation response, detected as melanized wasp eggs, was seen in approximately 50% of the control larvae (carrying the driver or the RNAi construct only) 27 h after infection (Fig 5C). In contrast, only 15% of the ird1-suppressed larvae were able to mount this type of immune response. Thus ird1 is required in hemocytes for a full melanization response, in agreement with the role of this gene in the formation and/or function of crystal cells.
Reduced ird1 expression activates Toll signaling in fat body but not in hemocytes
Although ird1 mutations appear to suppress the Toll-mediated mobilization of sessile hemocytes, other ird1 phenotypes largely overlap with those of the Tl10b gain-of-function mutant, as described previously by Wu et al. [14,15]. The same authors also observed that mRNA of the Toll-responsive Drosomycin gene is expressed at an increased basal level in homozygous ird1 mutant larvae, which suggested to us that activated Toll signaling might be the reason for the Toll-like phenotypes of these mutants. Using the Toll-responsive Drs-GFP reporter [48], we found that the majority of ird1-/- larvae showed a robust GFP expression, similar to the Tl10b positive controls (Fig 5D), whereas this phenotype was less frequently encountered in heterozygous ird1Δvps15 (ird1+/-) animals (S5C Fig). This effect seemed to be restricted to the fat body. Specifically we saw no Toll induction in the hemocytes of ird1-/- larvae (Fig 5E) although, as previously reported, Drs-GFP can be detected in most plasmatocytes and some lamellocytes from larvae that have been septically injured [48]. In the same study it was shown that even wild-type individuals occasionally showed spontaneous Drs-GFP expression locally in inner organs like the trachea (an example is shown in Fig 5D). We disregarded the latter patterns of tissue expression in our study.
When we combined ird1IR with two copies of the Cg-GAL4 driver, which is expressed both in fat body and hemocytes, we were able to phenocopy the ird1-/- mutant-induced activation of Toll signaling in the fat body (Fig 5D), although the signal was only seen in parts of the fat bodies and a single copy of the Cg-GAL4 driver was not sufficient for this effect (S5C Fig). Like in the ird1-/- mutant, the effect was limited to the fat body and no Drs-GFP expression was detected in hemocytes (Fig 6E). In contrast, expressing ird1IR with two copies of HmlΔ-GAL4 or FB-GAL4 failed to induce Drs-GFP expression more frequently than driver control animals (S5C and S5D Fig). Thus, it is an open question whether it is the loss of ird1 function in hemocytes or in fat body that triggers the fat body-specific Toll response, or if ird1 must perhaps be suppressed in both tissues for this effect. As a positive control, it was sufficient to express >Tl10b specifically in blood cells with the HmlΔ-GAL4 driver, in the fat body with the FB-GAL4 driver, or in both tissues with the Cg-GAL4 driver to activate the Drs-GFP reporter in the respective tissues (S5C and S5D Fig).
In summary, our results show that the activation of the Toll signaling pathway in ird1 loss-of-function mutants is restricted to the fat body. The Toll response in the fat body most likely augments the ird1 hemocyte phenotypes, although Toll signaling in the hemocytes is not involved. However, Toll activation is not strictly required for the ird1 phenotypes, as some phenotypic effects are seen even when ird1 is suppressed in the hemocytes (Fig 2C and 2E), when no Toll activation could be detected.
ird1 is required for normal vesicle trafficking in the autophagy and endocytosis pathways of plasmatocytes
Using the PI3P binding reporter, UAS-GFP-Myc-2xFYVE, previous studies have established that class III PI 3-kinase is strictly required for PI3P formation and starvation-induced and developmentally-induced autophagy in the fat body and gut [36,49,50]. In contrast, studies of hemocytes suggest that in this cell type, PI3P can also be produced by the class II PI 3-kinase PI3K68D [51]. Because starvation enhanced the lamellocyte formation phenotype when we suppressed ird1 in hemocytes, we wanted to find out if ird1 is required for PI3P formation, autophagy and endocytic trafficking in hemocytes.
To monitor the in vivo activity of the PI 3-kinase Vps34 and its controlling subunit Ird1, we used the UAS-GFP-Myc-2xFYVE construct to visualize PI3P, which is located in early endosomes and multivesicular bodies, and lysotracker, which highlights late Rab7-positive endosomes and lysosomes [52,53]. Hemocyte-specific co-expression of this GFP-2xFYVE construct with ird1IR, using the HmlΔ-GAL4 driver, led to a highly distorted GFP and lysotracker pattern in most plasmatocytes (Fig 6A). In control plasmatocytes PI(3)P was localized to a small number of large structures. Upon silencing ird1 expression, both GFP-labeled and lysotracker-positive vesicles became smaller, more numerous and highly dispersed within the cytoplasm indicating that the growth and maturation of larger vesicles is blocked in this genotype (Fig 6A–6D). The fact that silencing of ird1 was not sufficient to remove all PI3P is in line with earlier studies where Vps34 was inactivated in hemocytes, indicating that unlike other cell types, hemocytes can produce PI3P by an alternative pathway, likely by PI3K68D [51].
To monitor autophagy, we took advantage of a mCherry-GFP-Atg8a fusion construct that fluoresces green and red in autophagosomal structures, but red only in autolysosomes where the low pH quenches GFP, thus acting as a reporter for autophagy activity and autophagy-mediated flux to the lysosome [54,55]. We expressed this marker with the HmlΔ-GAL4 driver, in effect limiting our study to plasmatocytes, as we found this driver to be down-regulated in lamellocytes. Plasmatocytes from fed control larvae showed numerous small autolysosomal vesicles marked by mCherry only, whereas a smaller number of vesicles expressed GFP, suggesting that autophagy is active under fed conditions in this cell type (Fig 6E and 6F). Starvation increased the number of vesicles, including the mCherry-only autolysosomes, in control cells (Fig 6F, statistical analysis in S6A Fig), and the mean vesicle size of the autolysosomes increased (Fig 6G). The fraction of mCherry-only autolysosomal vesicles was reduced in ird1IR-expressing plasmatocytes (Fig 6F, statistical analysis in S6B Fig), while the number of double positive structures increased, suggesting that some autophagosomes still formed. In starved animals, ird1 knockdown effectively reversed the size increase of mCherry-positive autolysosomes, which appeared similar to those of non-starved ird1-suppressed cells (Fig 6E and 6G), as well as the total number of vesicles (Fig 6F). Taken together, our results suggest that Ird1 is important for autophagic flux to the lysosome. Surprisingly, double positive mCherry-GFP-Atg8a structures were still present after ird1 knockdown, supporting the possibility that some autophagosome formation can occur independently of class III PI 3-kinase.
To further confirm the role of vesicular trafficking for the Tl10b hemocyte phenotypes we tested additional mutants, affecting factors in the same pathways as ird1 (S7A and S7B Fig). A heterozygous mutation in the Drosophila Vps18 homolog, deep orange (dor8) [56,57], had the same effects as ird1Δvps15 but mutations in other autophagy genes, including Vps34 [50], autophagy-related 1 (Atg1) [58], Atg8a [59] and Atg13 [60] only suppressed Toll-dependent hemocyte mobilization without affecting nodulation. Besides helping to orchestrate autosome to lysosome fusion, dor was suggested to play a conserved role in endocytic trafficking [57,61]. This indicates that while for Toll-dependent hemocyte mobilization an undisturbed vesicular trafficking system is of general importance, nodulation may be more specifically regulated by the actions of the endocytosis pathway. Finally, we found that Tl10b larvae heterozygous for a phosphatase and tensin homolog (Pten) loss-of-function allele [62] showed both increased nodulation and significantly reduced blood cell mobilization (S7A and S7B Fig), similar to the phenotype of ird1 mutants. This may seem surprising, since by its function Pten antagonizes the actions of the Ird1-PI 3-kinase complex, but may be in line with our observation that overexpression of ird1 gives a similar phenotype as the ird1 mutants (Fig 2A and 2C). Thus, an unimpeded vesicle transport is important for normal hemocyte mobilization in response to Toll-activated signals from the fat body.
Expression of ird1IR or Tl10b cause a similar re-localization of the Toll receptor
In embryos, activated Toll receptors are relocated from the cell membrane to early endosomes [63]. We observed a similar effect when we expressed the Tl-GFP fusion constructs of Lund et al. [63] in the fat body (Fig 7A, compare row 1 and 3). Like in the embryo, Tl-GFP outlined the cell borders at the plasma membrane in the fat body cells, though in two out of ten preparations the reporter was already partly re-localized from the plasma membrane to vesicles and cytoplasm (Fig 7A, compare row 1 and 2), possibly due to spurious activation of the Toll pathway during dissection. In contrast to Tl-GFP, the constitutively active Tl10b-GFP construct [63] was seen only in the intracellular compartment (Fig 7A, row 3) and the GFP-positive vesicles were bigger, more numerous and penetrated deeper into cytoplasm. The Tl10b-GFP construct also induced the formation of many early endosomal vesicles, as visualized with the Rab5-mCherry reporter [63]. However, only a minority of the Tl10b-GFP vesicles coincided with the Rab5-mCherry-labeled endosomal compartment (see merged images in Fig 7A, row 3).
The number of intracellular Tl-GFP-labeled vesicles also increased substantially when we suppressed ird1 in the fat body and a large number of mCherry-positive vesicles appeared, many of which were also Tl-GFP-positive (Fig 7A, row 4). Thus, like in plasmatocytes (Fig 6F) loss of ird1 expression leads to an abnormal accumulation of endosomal vesicles. The ird1 phenotype was reminiscent of the effect of the Tl10b-GFP construct, although some of the Tl-GFP label still remained at the cell membrane in the ird1-suppressed fat body cells. Co-expression of Tl10b-GFP and ird1IR with FB-GAL4 further enhanced the severity of this phenotype, and almost all Tl10b-GFP ended up in mCherry-labeled early endosomal vesicles.
Hemocytes are considerably smaller than fat body cells, making it difficult to image the translocation of the Toll receptor. Furthermore, the expression of HmlΔ-GAL4 can vary considerably from cell to cell. Therefore we averaged the signal intensities over fields with several plasmatocytes in hemolymph samples of the different genotypes. We found that plasmatocytes expressing Tl10b-GFP or ird1IR (together with the Tl-GFP reporter) showed stronger GFP expression compared to Tl-GFP-only controls (Fig 7B, quantified in C). This difference was not further enhanced by co-expression of Tl10b-GFP and ird1IR. In contrast, a constitutively activated Toll pathway alone did not lead to a significant enhancement of the average mCherry signal intensity (Fig 7D). Only co-expression of ird1IR and Tl-GFP or Tl10b-GFP significantly increased the expression levels of this reporter. Like in the fat body, we saw a similar trend that ird1 gene silencing in general moderately increased the co-localization of GFP and mCherry in plasmatocytes. In summary, this is one more example that activation of the Toll pathway and suppression of ird1 expression generate similar phenotypes.
ird1 expression in hemocytes is required for protrusion formation
The knockdown of myotubularin (mtm), another binding partner of Vps34 [64], in Drosophila hemocytes was previously shown to give rise to autophagy defects [51] similar to those we observed when we suppressed ird1 in hemocytes (Fig 6). Further it was demonstrated that increasing or decreasing expression of mtm or the autophagy regulator gene Atg1 in hemocytes hinders blood cell recruitment to wound sites in Drosophila larvae [51,65]. The authors argued that the abnormal morphologies displayed by these hemocytes ex vivo could explain their immobility. If a reduced ird1 gene dosage causes morphological defects similar to mtm/Atg1 knockdown hemocytes, this could explain why many of these cells remain sessile in Tl10b mutant larvae. Using fluorescently labeled phalloidin to visualize F-actin (red), we found that the total surface spread area of a blood cell was significantly reduced when ird1IR was expressed with the Cg-GAL4 driver, compared to control hemocytes (Fig 8A, quantified in B). A similar decrease in average cell area was measured when blood cells were extracted from ird1-/- or ird1Δvps15 heterozygous larvae. By subtracting the cellular region stained with the α-tubulin antibody (green) from the total phalloidin-labeled cell area (red), we found that the remaining surface F-actin protrusion area was significantly smaller in hemocytes from ird1-/- null larvae or animals expressing ird1IR with Cg-GAL4 (Fig 8C). Unlike a previous study [51], we found that expressing Vps34KD, a kinase-defective version of Vps34 [50], in hemocytes affected protrusion formation, although the effect was variable. The phenotype of hemocytes expressing Vps34KD often morphologically resembled that of blood cells with reduced ird1 gene dosage (two examples shown in S8A Fig). Also, expressing ird1IR with two hemocyte drivers, HmlΔ-GAL4 and He-GAL4, combined in the same stock with UAS-GFP, showed a similar though weaker phenotype as with the Cg-GAL4 driver (S8B Fig).
No increase in lamellocyte numbers was reported for the mtm and Atg1 mutants, but hemocytes in these mutants were shown to be defective in their ability to reshape and form protrusions [51,65]. We found a similar phenotype in plasmatocytes from the ird1 mutants, which were unable to spread on a glass surface (Fig 8A, S6B Fig). The periphery of hemocytes obtained from ird1Δvps15 heterozygotes and ird1-/- larvae, but not ird1IR expressing larvae, were on average more rounded than those of driver controls, and the effect could be quantified by estimating the circularity of the cells in the images (S6C Fig).
Conclusions
The artificially elevated activity of the Toll pathway in the Tl10b mutant has provided a sensitized genetic background, appropriate for a modifier screen, and we found that the hemocyte activation phenotype we scored was indeed affected by heterozygous deletions in numerous chromosomal regions. The sensitivity of the phenotype also led to substantial and significant effects when we crossed our Hml>GFP; Tl10b stock into different wild-type genetic backgrounds. We therefore focused on regions that gave the strongest and most consistent suppressive effects and the results we present here were also confirmed by testing several independent deficiencies, mutants and RNAi experiments.
Although we first identified the ird1 mutants because of their suppressive effect on the Tl10b hemocyte mobilization phenotype, they turned out to enhance all other hemocyte phenotypes of the Tl10b mutant, except the dispersal of primary lymph gland lobes. In fact, the ird1 null mutant generates Tl10b-like phenotypes even in a Toll wild-type background, including lamellocyte formation, melanotic nodules and increased numbers of circulating hemocytes. However, the ird1 mutants are unique in the way they affect hemocyte behavior. ird1 mutant plasmatocytes do not spread in a normal way on an artificial substrate, and lamellocytes are not efficiently released from their attachment sites under the larval epidermis. Thus, the apparent suppression of the Tl10b hemocyte mobilization phenotype may in fact due to a generally reduced mobility in the ird1 mutant hemocytes. This would also explain why the primary lymph gland lobes do not disperse, although they otherwise show all signs of being activated.
Whereas Toll-dependent activation of hemocytes is cell non-autonomous and mainly dependent on Toll signaling in the fat body [31], the ird1 mutant phenotypes depend to a large extent on the loss of ird1 function in the hemocytes themselves. We found that hemocyte-specific knockdown of ird1 was sufficient to suppress Tl10b-dependent mobilization of hemocytes in subepidermal bands and lymph glands, and to enhance other Tl10b hemocyte phenotypes. However, there is also contribution from the fat body to the ird1 null phenotype. It seems likely that Toll signaling becomes activated in the fat body in ird1 mutants, independently of ird1 function in the hemocytes.
The molecular mechanisms behind the effects of ird1 mutants on hemocytes remain unclear. In line with our findings, another component of the PI 3-kinase, Atg6, was recently also shown to generate hemocyte activation phenotypes, including melanotic nodule formation [66]. PI 3-kinase mutants, like ird1 and Atg6 are likely to affect several cellular processes, including autophagy and the endocytic recycling of receptors. The same is true for the other vesicle transport mutants we tested, and our experiments do not give a definite answer which cellular process is involved in the phenotypes we have studied. The ird1-dependent re-localization of the Toll receptor in the fat body may explain why Toll signaling is activated in that tissue, but it is uncertain to what extent Toll signaling contributes to the ird1 phenotype. Shravage et al. [66] saw no suppression of the Atg6 melanotic nodule phenotype in heterozygous Dif, dorsal deficiency larvae that were also Dif1 mutant, but it was not tested if Toll signaling was completely suppressed in these animals.
As the ird1 gene encodes a PI 3-kinase subunit with a central role in vesicular trafficking, presumably in many cell types, ird1 mutations might be expected to have very pleiotropic effects. It is therefore striking that phenotypic effects of ird1 mutants were so far only found in two genetic screens that were both related to immunity: our screen for genes that affect blood cell activation, and the earlier screen by Wu et al. [14] for the induction of antimicrobial peptides. We conclude that immune responses place particularly high demands on vesicle transport systems and cellular mobility.
Materials and Methods
Fly stocks
Deficiency stocks and w1118iso control flies, all with the same genetic background [33], were originally obtained from the late Szeged Drosophila stock center (Szeged, Hungary) and the Bloomington Stock Center (Bloomington, IN). The constitutively active Toll10b mutant (mwh1 e1 Tl10b /T(1;3)OR60/TM3, Sb1 Ser1) [32] and the hemocyte-specific driver HmlΔ-GAL4 (w1118; P{Hml-GAL4.Δ}2 P{wUAS-2xEGFP}AH2) [67] were for our purposes combined into one fly line. The hdc mutant alleles (hdcFus-6 and hdcFus-6-50) and the UAS-hdc strain [68,69] were provided by Christos Samakovlis. pum13 is a point mutation encoding a protein that is unable to repress hb mRNA translation [70]. pum3 has been used previously [71] but no molecular information has been reported. The loss-of-function allele of Ptenc494 [62] was a gift from Ernst Hafen. Thomas Neufeld provided us with the loss-of-function alleles of Vps34Δm22 [50], Atg1Δ3D [58] and Atg13Δ81 [60].
Fly stocks carrying hdc-RNAi constructs were from the Vienna Drosophila Resource Center (VDRC), with construct ID numbers 39876, 39877, 45069 from the GD and 104322 from the KK collection. Rab23 alleles, Rab2351 [72] and Rab23T69 [73], were obtained from József Mihály. The D1 alleles Df(3R)D1c12w-, Df(3R)D14A, D1EP473rec#70, D1Rev1B and Df(3R)D170-1 [74] were provided by Karen Weiler. The five EMS-induced point mutants ird11—ird15 and the P[w+, UAS-ird1 PA10-68] (here called ird1FL) insertion line [15] were kindly provided by Louisa Wu. The small deletion Δvps15 (here called ird1Δvps15) is described elsewhere [36]. A transgenic fly line harboring an inverted ird1 cDNA fragment under UAS control (here called ird1IR) [38] was provided by Satoshi Goto. A kinase-defective UAS-Vps34KD construct [50] was obtained from Thomas Neufeld. The UAS-Tl10b stock (y w P{UAS-Tl10b}11), constructed by Jean-Marc Reichhart (Centre National de stock Recherche Scientifique, Strasbourg, France) was a gift from him and it is now deposited at the Bloomington Stock Center. Overexpression of this construct is known to activate the Toll pathway [30,31]. A hypomorphic point mutation of deep orange, dor8/FM6 [18], and the Atg8a loss-of-function line y1 P{SUPor-P}Atg8aKG07569/FM7c [66] were obtained from the Bloomington Stock Center.
The following tissue-specific drivers were used to create specific loss-of or gain-of-function phenotypes in larvae, using the GAL4-UAS technique [75]: HmlΔ-GAL4, alone or in combination with another blood cell-specific GAL4 line He-GAL4 (P{He-GAL4.Z}) [30], the fat body-specific drivers FB-GAL4 (P{GAL4}fat) [76,77] and ppl-GAL4 [78,79] and the hemocyte- and fat body-specific driver Cg-GAL4 (w1118; P{Cg-GAL4.A}2) [80]. FB-GAL4 was obtained from the former Umeå Drosophila Stock Center. All other GAL4 lines can all be obtained from the Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center, and except for the ppl driver, we have checked their tissue specificities [31].
The following hemocyte type-specific reporter lines were used in the present study: for plasmatocytes eater-GFP [81] and eater-DsRed [39], and for lamellocytes MSNF9mo-mCherry (hereafter called msn-Cherry) [39]. They were obtained from the lab of Robert Schulz. For fat body in vivo and blood cell ex vivo observation of Toll activation, the Drs-GFP reporter (P{Drs-GFP.JM804}1) [48] was obtained from Dominique Ferrandon. To monitor the localization of the Tl-receptor in blood cells and fat bodies with and without a constitutively active Toll pathway, we expressed UAS-Tl-GFP and UAS-Tl10b-GFP constructs [63] provided by Robert DeLotto.
To visualize intracellular vesicles in hemocytes, we used the following reporter lines: UAS-mCherry-GFP-Atg8a [54] to monitor autophagosomes and lysosome fusion, the UAS-GFP-Myc-2xFYVE construct [53] for analysis of binding to membranes of early endosomes and multivesicular bodies and mCherry-Rab5 [63] to mark early endosome in both blood and fat body cells.
Fly crossing and handling of larvae
For each experimental cross 20 virgin females and 5–10 males of the desired genotypes were confined into a bottle containing standard potato diet with yeast and, when needed for staging, red household food dye. Crosses were transferred into new bottles every other day and kept in an incubator at 26°C and 60% humidity. When genes were to be silenced or over-expressed in the larval offspring, culture bottles were kept at 29°C to ensure optimal efficiency of the UAS/GAL4 system. Larvae were collected from bottle walls after 3–6 days and staged according to published procedures [82] at a stage just before the gut contents were completely cleared. To prepare for in vivo inspection or dissection, the collected larvae were gently washed and either transferred to water-containing Petri dishes and kept on ice, or directly ripped open on multiwall slides for hemocyte collection.
Nodule frequency and grading of sessile hemocyte banding pattern
Before analysis, bottles containing the crosses were assigned with arbitrary numbers to blind the examiner, and the genotypes of the cross were not revealed before completion of the experiment. For assessing nodule frequencies, for each cross 50 F1 third instar larvae were collected at random, gently washed in water with a paintbrush and then inspected for nodule frequencies under a stereo microscope. To grade the banded pattern of sessile hemocytes, additional larvae were collected and laid with their ventral side down on ice-cold glass slides. The larvae were then embedded in 50% ice-cold glycerol under a cover glass before being transferred into a refrigerator. After 20 min at -20°C or over-night incubation at +4°C, they were placed on ice and immediately analyzed under a fluorescence microscope. For each deficiency tested in the screen, 16–22 larvae from 1–5 independent crosses were individually scored for the degree of mobilization of the bands of sessile hemocytes under the epidermis [35]. A mobilization index was defined as follows: Grade 1, larvae with sessile hemocyte bands in all segments; Grade 2, and 3, bands of sessile cells in less than 50 and 75% of the segments respectively; Grade 4, no discrete bands of sessile cells in any, or at most in the posterior 25% of the segments (see Fig 1A). In other experiments, all crosses were repeated three times and the nodule frequencies and the average mobilization indexes were calculated each time.
Infection by bacteria and parasitoid wasps
Third instar larvae were infected with an Escherichia coli (E. coli) suspension and the following melanization reactions monitored as described [14]. Fly crosses for wasp infection were performed as described above, except that they were transferred daily into new vials kept at 25°C. At day three after egg-lay, 20 female and 10 male Leptopilina boulardi G486 wasps were transferred to the culture. After 2 h at room temperature the wasps were removed and the vials transferred to an incubator set to 29°C and 60% humidity. After 25 hours in the incubator, third instar larvae were collected and dissected under a stereo microscope until approximately 100 infected larvae were scored. If this number was not achieved within two hours, the procedure was repeated the next day with parasitized offspring produced by the same cross. A wasp egg was counted as melanized if it showed any discoloration.
Blood cell counting
To collect blood cells, 10 third instar larvae per cross were placed separately in the wells of a 12-well glass slide, each containing 20 μl of ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; 137 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 6.7 mM Na2HPO4, 1.5 mM KH2PO4). The animals were carefully ripped open with the help of two watchmaker forceps and the carcasses were removed from the glass slide and 10 μl of the blood cell suspension were transferred to a Neubauer hemocytometer chamber (Paul Marienfeld GmbH & Co. KG, Lauda-Königshofen, Germany). Plasmatocytes were recognized based on their morphology and (if present) by the expression of blood cell type-specific reporters. Counting was done using a phase contrast microscope, equipped with a UV source (Axioplan, Carl Zeiss, 40–60 x magnification) and each experiment was repeated three times using larvae produced by independent crosses.
Specific staining of hemocyte classes
The specificity of expression of GAL4 lines and reporters for different hemocyte types was tested using mouse monoclonal primary antibodies. To identify plasmatocytes we used P1/ Nimrod C1 and for lamellocytes L1/Atilla antibodies [42] both provided by István Andó. Crystal cells were detected using the C1 (HC12F6) antibody [46,47], a kind gift of Tina Trenczek. Crystal cells were also visualized by heating larvae in water filled tubes for 10 min in a heat block set to 65°C [45]. Primary antibodies were visualized with Cy2-conjugated goat anti-mouse polyclonal antibody (1:600, Millipore), Cy3 conjugated AffiniPure Goat Anti-Mouse IgG (H+L) (1:2000, Jackson ImmunoResearch) or goat anti-rabbit IgG conjugated to Cy3 (1:3000, Life Technologies), all diluted in PBS with 3% bovine serum albumin (BSA). To visualize blood cell morphology, cells were stained with anti-α-tubulin-FITC antibody (1:100, Sigma-Aldrich) and/or AlexaFluor 594 Phalloidin stain (1:50, Life Technologies) and 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI, 1 μg/ml, Sigma-Aldrich) diluted in PBS.
Blood cell, fat body and lymph gland preparation and staining
For hemocyte preparation, larvae were opened as described above, carcasses removed and the glass slides containing the hemocytes transferred to a humid chamber to let the blood cells attach for 20–30 min at room temperature (RT). To expose fat body or lymph glands, larvae were sliced open laterally in PBS using fine scissors and as much of the unwanted internal organs as possible were removed. The carcasses were then transferred separately into wells of a 12-well glass slide containing PBS on ice. From this step onward blood cell- and carcass-containing wells were treated the same way. Next, PBS was removed and replaced by 3.5% paraformaldehyde (Sigma-Aldrich) in PBS. After 10 min of fixation, wells were washed three times for 5 min with PBS. After the last PBS removal, 0.1% Triton X-100 (Sigma-Aldrich) in PBS was added to permeabilize cell membranes. After 10 min, the PBS washing step was repeated and 3% BSA in PBS added. After 1 h at 4°C the BSA solution was exchanged for the respective primary antibody solution, diluted with 3% BSA. Following an overnight incubation at 4°C and a PBS washing step, secondary antibody diluted 1:2000 in 3% BSA was added and the cells were incubated in the dark for 1 h at room temperature, then washed twice with PBS, and finally a Hoechst 33258 (Sigma-Aldrich) or DAPI solution (both 1 μg/ml, Sigma-Aldrich) in PBS was added for 10 min. After a final washing step the wells were mounted with 50% glycerol in PBS or Prolong Gold Antifade Reagent (Life Technologies) before sealing the sides of the cover glass with nail polish for microscopy. For visualization of lysosomes, hemocytes were bled into Schneider’s Drosophila medium (Gibco) and stained for 5–7 min at room temperature in the dark with a solution containing Hoechst and LysoTracker red DND-99 (0.03 μg/ μl, Invitrogen) in anhydrous dimethyl sulfoxide (1 mg/100 ml; Sigma-Aldrich). The cells were then washed, fixed and mounted as described above.
Quantitative RT-PCR
Total RNA was prepared of hemocytes collected as described above using the Aurum Total RNA Mini Kit (BioRad). One-step quantitative real-time PCR was performed in duplicate using the probe detection system as described [83] with an I-cycle iQ Thermal Cycler (BioRad). The following primers were used: sense, 5’-TTCTGCATGAGCAGGACCTC-3’; antisense, 5’-GGTTACGGATCGAACAAGCG-3’ for Rpl32 (Ribosomal protein large subunit 32) that functioned as a control and sense, 5’-GACTATCTCAACATGAACTAA-3’; antisense, 5’-TTAGTTCATGTTGAGATAGTC-3’ for the hdc gene. Reactions were set up in a total of 25 μl per sample: 12.5 μl BioRad (iScript One-Step RT-PCR Kit with SYBR Green. The exact contents of this kit appear to be a company secret), 10 μl H2O, 0.5 μl of each hdc sense and antisense primer (10 μM) and 0.5 μl reverse transcriptase enzyme (BioRad, the enzyme activity appears to be a company secret). The same volumes were used for Rpl32. Cycle conditions were as follows; cDNA synthesis (50°C for 10 min), denaturation (95°C for 3 min) and PCR cycles (95°C for 10 s, 60°C for 20 s and 72°C for 20 s) repeated 40 times.
Microscopy and image analysis
Grading of larvae was done with an Axioplan light and UV microscope (Carl Zeiss, 2.5–10 x magnification). Images of living larvae or blood cells stained with antibodies and expressing reporters were taken with the same set up, or with a Nikon Digital sight color camera (Ds-Fi1), on a Nikon Eclipse 90i microscope run by NIS-Elements AR software. The same computer program was used to improve image quality by 2D real-time deconvolution and to quantify intracellular vesicle sizes and relative signal intensities or co-localizations. Sessile blood cell numbers were quantified automatically in cropped and inverted 8-bit microscopic images of the same segment in all larvae (10 x magnification), which had proven to be most reliable, with the ITCN plugin module of the ImageJ software (version 1.47; http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/). Lymph glands and fat bodies were scanned at an optimized number of slices using a Nikon laser confocal microscope (D-Eclipse C1) and images converted into maximum intensity projections using the NIS-Elements AR software. In addition, all images were enhanced using Photoshop CS3 software. For ex vivo imaging of hemocyte morphology, stained cells were imaged using a Nikon Eclipse Ti confocal microscope and Andor iQ3 software. Z stack images with 100x magnification were taken separately for three channels (green, red, blue). Z projection images were generated and merged images including all three channels were created using ImageJ. Ex vivo hemocyte spread areas on glass slides were also quantified using ImageJ.
Statistical analysis
A Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) by ranks test was run to automatically compare distributions across groups determining significant differences in pairwise comparisons of mobilization indices as well as, sizes, numbers and relative proportions of intracellular vesicles. Mobilization indices were calculated for repeated crosses of the same genotype as well as different genotypes. When only two groups were compared the Mann-Whitney U exact test was applied. Data from sessile and circulating plasmatocyte counts were log10 transformed and then analyzed for significant differences using ANOVA with a Games-Howell post-hoc test (equal variances not assumed). All statistical data analysis was done with the IBM SPSS software, version 22.
Supporting Information
Acknowledgments
We thank Jens-Ola Ekström, Michael Williams, Uli Theopold, Róbert Márkus, Caroline Bäreclev and Merle Zante for valuable discussions, comments and practical support. We are grateful for the fly strains provided by other researchers and the Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center at Indiana University, the Vienna Drosophila Resource Center (VDRC), the Drosophila Genetic Resource Center (DGRC) in Kyoto, and the late Szeged Drosophila Stock Center. The Drosophila work was, in part, carried out at the University of Tampere Drosophila core facility, supported by Biocenter Finland.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the Swedish Research Council (http://www.vr.se/), the Swedish Cancer Society (https://www.cancerfonden.se/) and the Sigrid Juselius Foundation (http://www.sigridjuselius.fi/) to DH, the Academy of Finland (http://www.aka.fi/en/) to DH and MR, Competitive Research Funding of the Tampere University Hospital (http://www.pshp.fi/) to MR, and the Research Council of Norway (http://www.forskningsradet.no/) through its Centres of Excellence funding scheme to TER. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Anderson KV, Nüsslein-Volhard C. Information for the dorsal—ventral pattern of the Drosophila embryo is stored as maternal mRNA. Nature. 1984; 311: 223–227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Steward R. Dorsal, an embryonic polarity gene in Drosophila, is homologous to the vertebrate proto-oncogene, c-rel. Science. 1987; 238: 692–694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hashimoto C, Hudson KL, Anderson KV. The Toll gene of Drosophila, required for dorsal-ventral embryonic polarity, appears to encode a transmembrane protein. Cell. 1988; 52: 269–279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Rosetto M, Engström Y, Baldari CT, Telford JL, Hultmark D. Signals from the IL-1 receptor homolog, Toll, can activate an immune response in a Drosophila hemocyte cell line. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1995; 209: 111–116. 10.1006/bbrc.1995.1477 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Lemaitre B, Nicolas E, Michaut L, Reichhart J-M, Hoffmann JA. The dorsoventral regulatory gene cassette spätzle/Toll/cactus controls the potent antifungal response in Drosophila adults. Cell. 1996; 86: 973–983. S0092-8674(00)80172-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Boman HG. Antibacterial peptides: basic facts and emerging concepts. J Intern Med. 2003; 254: 197–215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Zasloff M. Antimicrobial peptides of multicellular organisms. Nature. 2002; 415: 389–395. 10.1038/415389a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Valanne S, Wang JH, Rämet M. The Drosophila Toll signaling pathway. J Immunol. 2011; 186: 649–656. 10.4049/jimmunol.1002302 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lindsay SA, Wasserman SA. Conventional and non-conventional Drosophila Toll signaling. Dev Comp Immunol. 2014; 42: 16–24. 10.1016/j.dci.2013.04.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hultmark D. Drosophila immunity: paths and patterns. Curr Opin Immunol. 2003; 15: 12–19. S0952791502000055 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lemaitre B, Hoffmann J. The host defense of Drosophila melanogaster. Annu Rev Immunol. 2007; 25: 697–743. 10.1146/annurev.immunol.25.022106.141615 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Medzhitov R, Preston-Hurlburt P, Janeway CA Jr. A human homologue of the Drosophila Toll protein signals activation of adaptive immunity. Nature. 1997; 388: 394 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Poltorak A, He X, Smirnova I, Liu MY, Van Huffel C, Du X, et al. Defective LPS signaling in C3H/HeJ and C57BL/10ScCr mice: mutations in Tlr4 gene. Science. 1998; 282: 2085–2088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Wu LP, Choe KM, Lu Y, Anderson KV. Drosophila immunity: genes on the third chromosome required for the response to bacterial infection. Genetics. 2001; 159: 189–199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Wu J, Randle KE, Wu LP. ird1 is a Vps15 homologue important for antibacterial immune responses in Drosophila. Cell Microbiol. 2007; 9: 1073–1085. 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2006.00853.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Gerttula S, Jin Y, Anderson KV. Zygotic expression and activity of the Drosophila Toll gene, a gene required maternally for embryonic dorsal-ventral pattern formation. Genetics. 1988; 119: 123–133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Qiu P, Pan PC, Govind S. A role for the Drosophila Toll/Cactus pathway in larval hematopoiesis. Development. 1998; 125: 1909–1920. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lindmo K, Stenmark H. Regulation of membrane traffic by phosphoinositide 3-kinases. J Cell Sci. 2006; 119: 605–614. 10.1242/jcs.02855 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Liljeroos M, Vuolteenaho R, Morath S, Hartung T, Hallman M, Ojaniemi M. Bruton's tyrosine kinase together with PI 3-kinase are part of Toll-like receptor 2 multiprotein complex and mediate LTA induced Toll-like receptor 2 responses in macrophages. Cell Signal. 2007; 19: 625–633. 10.1016/j.cellsig.2006.08.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kleino A, Silverman N. The Drosophila IMD pathway in the activation of the humoral immune response. Dev Comp Immunol. 2014; 42: 25–35. 10.1016/j.dci.2013.05.014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Williams MJ. Drosophila Hemopoiesis and Cellular Immunity. J Immunol. 2007; 178: 4711–4716. 10.4049/jimmunol.178.8.4711 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Honti V, Csordás G, Kurucz E, Márkus R, Andó I. The cell-mediated immunity of Drosophila melanogaster: Hemocyte lineages, immune compartments, microanatomy and regulation. Dev Comp Immunol. 2014; 42: 47–56. 10.1016/j.dci.2013.06.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ulvila J, Vanha-aho LM, Kleino A, Vähä-Mäkilä M, Vuoksio M, Eskelinen S, et al. Cofilin regulator 14-3-3ζ is an evolutionarily conserved protein required for phagocytosis and microbial resistance. J Leukoc Biol. 2011; 89: 649–659. 10.1189/jlb.0410195 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Binggeli O, Neyen C, Poidevin M, Lemaitre B. Prophenoloxidase activation is required for survival to microbial infections in Drosophila. PLoS Pathog. 2014; 10: e1004067 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004067 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Rizki TM, Rizki RM. Lamellocyte differentiation in Drosophila larvae parasitized by Leptopilina. Dev Comp Immunol. 1992; 16: 103–110. 10.1016/0145-305X(92)90011-Z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Márkus R, Laurinyecz B, Kurucz E, Honti V, Bajusz I, Sipos B, et al. Sessile hemocytes as a hematopoietic compartment in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009; 106: 4805–4809. 10.1073/pnas.0801766106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Honti V, Csordás G, Márkus R, Kurucz É, Jankovics F, Andó I. Cell lineage tracing reveals the plasticity of the hemocyte lineages and of the hematopoietic compartments in Drosophila melanogaster. Mol Immunol. 2010; 47: 1997–2004. 10.1016/j.molimm.2010.04.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Stofanko M, Kwon SY, Badenhorst P. Lineage Tracing of Lamellocytes Demonstrates Drosophila Macrophage Plasticity. PLoS One. 2010; 5: e14051 10.1371/journal.pone.0014051 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Holz A, Bossinger B, Strasser T, Janning W, Klapper R. The two origins of hemocytes in Drosophila. Development 2003; 130: 4955–4962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Zettervall CJ, Anderl I, Williams MJ, Palmer R, Kurucz E, Ando I, et al. A directed screen for genes involved in Drosophila blood cell activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004; 101: 14192–14197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Schmid M, Anderl A, Vesala L, Vanha-aho L-M, Deng X-J, Rämet M, et al. Control of Drosophila blood cell activation via Toll signaling in the fat body. PloS One. 2014; 9: e102568 10.1371/journal.pone.0102568 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Erdélyi M, Szabad J. Isolation and Characterization of Dominant Female Sterile Mutations of Drosophila melanogaster. I. Mutations on the Third Chromosome. Genetics. 1989; 122: 111–127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ryder E, Ashburner M, Bautista-Llacer R, Drummond J, Webster J, Johnson G, et al. The DrosDel deletion collection: a Drosophila genomewide chromosomal deficiency resource. Genetics. 2007; 177: 615–629. 10.1534/genetics.107.076216 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Parks AL, Cook KR, Belvin M, Dompe NA, Fawcett R, Huppert K, et al. Systematic generation of high-resolution deletion coverage of the Drosophila melanogaster genome. Nat Genet. 2004; 36: 288–292. 10.1038/ng1312 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Valanne S, Myllymäki H, Kallio J, Schmid MR, Kleino A, Murumagi A, et al. Genome-wide RNA interference in Drosophila cells identifies G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 as a conserved regulator of NF-κB signaling. J Immunol. 2010; 184: 6188–6198. 10.4049/jimmunol.1000261 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Lindmo K, Brech A, Finley KD, Gaumer S, Contamine D, Rusten TE, et al. The PI 3-kinase regulator Vps15 is required for autophagic clearance of protein aggregates. Autophagy. 2008; 4: 500–506. 5829 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.St Pierre SE, Ponting L, Stefancsik R, McQuilton P, the FlyBase Consortium. FlyBase 102—advanced approaches to interrogating FlyBase. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014; 42: D780–788. 10.1093/nar/gkt1092 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Abe M, Setoguchi Y, Tanaka T, Awano W, Takahashi K, Ueda R, et al. Membrane protein location-dependent regulation by PI3K (III) and rabenosyn-5 in Drosophila wing cells. PLoS One. 2009; 4: e7306 10.1371/journal.pone.0007306 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Tokusumi T, Shoue DA, Tokusumi Y, Stoller JR, Schulz RA. New hemocyte-specific enhancer-reporter transgenes for the analysis of hematopoiesis in Drosophila. Genesis. 2009; 47: 771–774. 10.1002/dvg.20561 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Kroeger PT Jr, Tokusumi T, Schulz RA. Transcriptional regulation of eater gene expression in Drosophila blood cells. Genesis. 2011; 50: 41–49. 10.1002/dvg.20787 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Vilmos P, Nagy I, Kurucz É, Hultmark D, Gateff E, Andó I. A rapid rosetting method for separation of hemocyte sub-populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Dev Comp Immunol. 2004; 28: 555–563. 10.1016/j.dci.2003.10.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Kurucz É, Váczi B, Márkus R, Laurinyecz B, Vilmos P, Zsámboki J, et al. Definition of Drosophila hemocyte subsets by cell-type specific antigens. Acta Biologica Hungarica. 2007; 58 Suppl: 95–111. 10.1556/ABiol.58.2007.Suppl.8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Kurucz É, Márkus R, Zsámboki J, Folkl-Medzihradszky K, Darula Z, Vilmos P, et al. Nimrod, a putative phagocytosis receptor with EGF repeats in Drosophila plasmatocytes. Curr Biol. 2007; 17: 649–654. 10.1016/j.cub.2007.02.041 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Lanot R, Zachary D, Holder F, Meister M. Postembryonic Hematopoiesis in Drosophila. Dev Biol. 2001; 230: 243–257. 10.1006/dbio.2000.0123 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Rizki TM, Rizki RM, Grell EH. A mutant affecting the crystal cells in Drosophila melanogaster. Roux's Arch Dev Biol. 1980; 188: 91–99. 10.1007/bf00848799 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Johansson KC, Metzendorf C, Söderhäll K. Microarray analysis of immune challenged Drosophila hemocytes. Exp Cell Res. 2005; 305: 145–155. 10.1016/j.yexcr.2004.12.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Trenczek T. Cellular defense mechanisms of insects In: Simões N, Boemare N, Ehlers R-U, editors. Entomopathogenic nematodes: Pathogenicity of entomopathogenic nematodes versus insect defence mechanisms: Impact on selection of virulent strains; 1996; Ponta Delgada, Açores, Portugal: European Commission, Brussels; pp. 95–113. [Google Scholar]
- 48.Ferrandon D, Jung AC, Criqui M, Lemaitre B, Uttenweiler-Joseph S, Michaut L, et al. A drosomycin-GFP reporter transgene reveals a local immune response in Drosophila that is not dependent on the Toll pathway. EMBO J. 1998; 17: 1217–1227. 10.1093/emboj/17.5.1217 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Anding AL, Baehrecke EH. Vps15 is required for stress induced and developmentally triggered autophagy and salivary gland protein secretion in Drosophila. Cell Death Differ. 2014. 10.1038/cdd.2014.174 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Juhász G, Hill JH, Yan Y, Sass M, Baehrecke EH, Backer JM, et al. The class III PI(3)K Vps34 promotes autophagy and endocytosis but not TOR signaling in Drosophila. J Cell Biol. 2008; 181: 655–666. 10.1083/jcb.200712051 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Velichkova M, Juan J, Kadandale P, Jean S, Ribeiro I, Raman V, et al. Drosophila Mtm and class II PI3K coregulate a PI(3)P pool with cortical and endolysosomal functions. J Cell Biol. 2010; 190: 407–425. 10.1083/jcb.200911020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Gillooly DJ, Morrow IC, Lindsay M, Gould R, Bryant NJ, Gaullier J-M, et al. Localization of phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate in yeast and mammalian cells. EMBO J. 2000; 19: 4577–4588. 10.1093/emboj/19.17.4577 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Wucherpfennig T, Wilsch-Bräuninger M, González-Gaitán M. Role of Drosophila Rab5 during endosomal trafficking at the synapse and evoked neurotransmitter release. J Cell Biol. 2003; 161: 609–624. 10.1083/jcb.200211087 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Nezis IP, Shravage BV, Sagona AP, Lamark T, Bjørkøy G, Johansen T, et al. Autophagic degradation of dBruce controls DNA fragmentation in nurse cells during late Drosophila melanogaster oogenesis. J Cell Biol. 2010; 190: 523–531. 10.1083/jcb.201002035 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Rahman M, Haberman A, Tracy C, Ray S, Krämer H. Drosophila mauve Mutants Reveal a Role of LYST Homologs Late in the Maturation of Phagosomes and Autophagosomes. Traffic. 2012; 13: 1680–1692. 10.1111/tra.12005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Takáts S, Pircs K, Nagy P, Varga Á, Kárpáti M, Hegedüs K, et al. Interaction of the HOPS complex with Syntaxin 17 mediates autophagosome clearance in Drosophila. Mol Biol Cell. 2014; 25: 1338–1354. 10.1091/mbc.E13-08-0449 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Lindmo K, Simonsen A, Brech A, Finley K, Rusten TE, Stenmark H. A dual function for Deep orange in programmed autophagy in the Drosophila melanogaster fat body. Exp Cell Res. 2006; 312: 2018–2027. 10.1016/j.yexcr.2006.03.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Scott RC, Juhász G, Neufeld TP. Direct induction of autophagy by Atg1 inhibits cell growth and induces apoptotic cell death. Curr Biol. 2007; 17: 1–11. 10.1016/j.cub.2006.10.053 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Simonsen A, Cumming RC, Brech A, Isakson P, Schubert DR, Finley KD. Promoting basal levels of autophagy in the nervous system enhances longevity and oxidant resistance in adult Drosophila. Autophagy. 2008; 4: 176–184. 10.4161/auto.5269 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Chang YY, Neufeld TP. An Atg1/Atg13 complex with multiple roles in TOR-mediated autophagy regulation. Mol Biol Cell. 2009; 20: 2004–2014. 10.1091/mbc.E08-12-1250 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Sevrioukov EA, He JP, Moghrabi N, Sunio A, Krämer H. A role for the deep orange and carnation eye color genes in lysosomal delivery in Drosophila. Mol Cell. 1999; 4: 479–486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Huang H, Potter CJ, Tao W, Li DM, Brogiolo W, Hafen E, et al. PTEN affects cell size, cell proliferation and apoptosis during Drosophila eye development. Development. 1999; 126: 5365–5372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Lund VK, DeLotto Y, DeLotto R. Endocytosis is required for Toll signaling and shaping of the Dorsal/NF-κB morphogen gradient during Drosophila embryogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010; 107: 18028–18033. 10.1073/pnas.1009157107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Taylor GS, Maehama T, Dixon JE. Myotubularin, a protein tyrosine phosphatase mutated in myotubular myopathy, dephosphorylates the lipid second messenger, phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000; 97: 8910–8915. 10.1073/pnas.160255697 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Kadandale P, Stender JD, Glass CK, Kiger AA. Conserved role for autophagy in Rho1-mediated cortical remodeling and blood cell recruitment. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010; 107: 10502–10507. 10.1073/pnas.0914168107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Shravage BV, Hill JH, Powers CM, Wu L, Baehrecke EH. Atg6 is required for multiple vesicle trafficking pathways and hematopoiesis in Drosophila. Development. 2013; 140: 1321–1329. 10.1242/dev.089490 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Sinenko SA, Mathey-Prevot B. Increased expression of Drosophila tetraspanin, Tsp68C, suppresses the abnormal proliferation of ytr-deficient and Ras//Raf-activated hemocytes. Oncogene. 2004; 23: 9120–9128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Hartenstein V, Jan YN. Studying Drosophila embryogenesis with P-lacZ enhancer trap lines. Roux's Arch Dev Biol. 1992; 201: 194–220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Steneberg P, Englund C, Kronhamn J, Weaver TA, Samakovlis C. Translational readthrough in the hdc mRNA generates a novel branching inhibitor in the Drosophila trachea. Genes Dev. 1998; 12: 956–967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Wharton RP, Sonoda J, Lee T, Patterson M, Murata Y. The Pumilio RNA-binding domain is also a translational regulator. Mol Cell. 1998; 1: 863–872. 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80085-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Kim SY, Kim JY, Malik S, Son W, Kwon KS, Kim C. Negative regulation of EGFR/MAPK pathway by Pumilio in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS One. 2012; 7: e34016 10.1371/journal.pone.0034016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Pataki C, Matusek T, Kurucz É, Andó I, Jenny A, Mihály J. Drosophila Rab23 is involved in the regulation of the number and planar polarization of the adult cuticular hairs. Genetics. 2010; 184: 1051–1065. 10.1534/genetics.109.112060 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Xu T, Rubin GM. Analysis of genetic mosaics in developing and adult Drosophila tissues. Development. 1993; 117: 1223–1237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Weiler KS, Chatterjee S. The multi-AT-hook chromosomal protein of Drosophila melanogaster, D1, is dispensable for viability. Genetics. 2009; 182: 145–159. 10.1534/genetics.109.101386 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Brand AH, Perrimon N. Targeted gene expression as a means of altering cell fates and generating dominant phenotypes. Development. 1993; 118: 401 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Grönke S, Beller M, Fellert S, Ramakrishnan H, Jäckle H, Kühnlein RP. Control of fat storage by a Drosophila PAT domain protein. Curr Biol. 2003; 13: 603–606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Maxton-Küchenmeister J, Handel K, Schmidt-Ott U, Roth S, Jäckle H. Toll homologue expression in the beetle Tribolium suggests a different mode of dorsoventral patterning than in Drosophila embryos. Mech Dev. 1999; 83: 107–114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Zinke I, Kirchner C, Chao LC, Tetzlaff MT, Pankratz MJ. Suppression of food intake and growth by amino acids in Drosophila: The role of pumpless, a fat body expressed gene with homology to vertebrate glycine cleavage system. Development. 1999; 126: 5275–5284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Colombani J, Raisin S, Pantalacci S, Radimerski T, Montagne J, Léopold P. A nutrient sensor mechanism controls Drosophila growth. Cell. 2003; 114: 739–749. 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00713-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Asha H, Nagy I, Kovacs G, Stetson D, Ando I, Dearolf CR. Analysis of Ras-induced overproliferation in Drosophila hemocytes. Genetics. 2003; 163: 203–215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Sorrentino RP, Tokusumi T, Schulz RA. The Friend of GATA protein U-shaped functions as a hematopoietic tumor suppressor in Drosophila. Dev Biol. 2007; 311: 311–323. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2007.08.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Andres AJ, Thummel CS. Methods for quantitative analysis of transcription in larvae and prepupae In: Goldstein LSB, Fyrberg EA, editors. Drosophila melanogaster: Practical uses in cell and molecular biology. San Diego: Academic Press; 1994. pp. 565–573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Habayeb MS, Cantera R, Casanova G, Ekström JO, Albright S, Hultmark D. The Drosophila Nora virus is an enteric virus, transmitted via feces. J Invertebr Pathol. 2009; 101: 29–33. 10.1016/j.jip.2009.02.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.