Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Pathology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Pathology
. 1991 Sep;44(9):775–777. doi: 10.1136/jcp.44.9.775

Evaluation of the Microring YT system for identifying clinical yeast isolates.

E J Ridgway 1, K D Allen 1
PMCID: PMC496730  PMID: 1918410

Abstract

The Microring YT is a commercial system for identifying clinical yeast isolates. The system uses a series of discs impregnated with inhibitory agents mounted on a ring. The pattern of growth and inhibition produced provides a six digit code which can be compared with a table provided by the manufacturer. The performance of this system was compared with the API 32C in the identification of 606 yeast isolates (355 clinical and 251 environmental strains). The Microring YT system was in 72.6% agreement with the API 32C system. The sensitivity of identification of different species varied from 38% to 100%. The API 32C system has a more extensive database than the Microring YT and is thus more reliable for use, but it is considerably more expensive. It is concluded that although the Microring YT is cheap, easy, and convenient to use, it is inadequate for many common Candida species.

Full text

PDF
777

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Blinkhorn R. J., Adelstein D., Spagnuolo P. J. Emergence of a new opportunistic pathogen, Candida lusitaniae. J Clin Microbiol. 1989 Feb;27(2):236–240. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.2.236-240.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Land G., Stotler R., Land K., Staneck J. Update and evaluation of the AutoMicrobic yeast identification system. J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Oct;20(4):649–652. doi: 10.1128/jcm.20.4.649-652.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Merz W. G., Karp J. E., Schron D., Saral R. Increased incidence of fungemia caused by Candida krusei. J Clin Microbiol. 1986 Oct;24(4):581–584. doi: 10.1128/jcm.24.4.581-584.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Shankland G. S., Hopwood V., Forster R. A., Evans E. G., Richardson M. D., Warnock D. W. Multicenter evaluation of Microring YT, a new method of yeast identification. J Clin Microbiol. 1990 Dec;28(12):2808–2810. doi: 10.1128/jcm.28.12.2808-2810.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Sobczak H. A simple disk-diffusion test for differentiation of yeast species. J Med Microbiol. 1985 Dec;20(3):307–316. doi: 10.1099/00222615-20-3-307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. el-Zaatari M., Pasarell L., McGinnis M. R., Buckner J., Land G. A., Salkin I. F. Evaluation of the updated Vitek yeast identification data base. J Clin Microbiol. 1990 Sep;28(9):1938–1941. doi: 10.1128/jcm.28.9.1938-1941.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Pathology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES