Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2016 Aug 4;6:30780. doi: 10.1038/srep30780

Systematic review and meta-analysis of nasal potential difference in hypoxia-induced lung injury

Zhenlei Su 1,2,*, Lili Zhu 3,*, Jing Wu 1,*, Runzhen Zhao 4, Hong-Long Ji 4,5,a
PMCID: PMC4973263  PMID: 27488696

Abstract

Nasal potential difference (NPD), a well-established in vivo clinical test for cystic fibrosis, reflects transepithelial cation and anion transport in the respiratory epithelium. To analyze whether NPD can be applied to diagnose hypoxic lung injury, we searched PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, Ovid MEDLINE, and Google Scholar, and analyzed data retrieved from eleven unbiased studies for high altitude pulmonary edema (HAPE) and respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) using the software RevMan and R. There was a significant reduction in overall basal (WMD −5.27 mV, 95% CI: −6.03 to −4.52, P < 0.00001, I2 = 42%), amiloride-sensitive (ENaC) (−2.87 mV, 95% CI: −4.02 to −1.72, P < 0.00001, I2 = 51%), and -resistant fractions (−3.91 mV, 95% CI: −7.64 to −0.18, P = 0.04, I2 = 95%) in lung injury patients. Further analysis of HAPE and RDS separately corroborated these observations. Moreover, SpO2 correlated with ENaC-associated NPD positively in patients only, but apparently related to CFTR-contributed NPD level inversely. These correlations were confirmed by the opposite associations between NPD values and altitude, which had a negative regression with SpO2 level. Basal NPD was significantly associated with amiloride-resistant but not ENaC fraction. Our analyses demonstrate that acute lung injury associated with systemic hypoxia is characterized by dysfunctional NPD.


Acute lung injury (ALI) could be caused by systemic hypoxia subsequent to sepsis and high altitude1. Both high altitude pulmonary edema (HAPE) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) are characterized by dysfunctional blood-gas barrier. Common symptoms of ALI include shortness in breathing, coughing, increased respiratory rate and heart beating, cyanosis, and fatigue. Two classic hallmarks of ALI, as revealed by laboratory tests, are pulmonary edema and reduced peripheral capillary oxygen saturation (SpO2). The balance of fluid turnover and re-absorption across the epithelial layer is finely maintained by the machinery of membrane protein assemble, including apically located ion channels (i.e., epithelial sodium channels-ENaC, cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator-CFTR) and basolateral Na+/K+-ATPase. This vectorial transepithelial process is rate-limiting and sensitive to oxygen level2. In addition, hypoxia led to increased microvascular pressure and transendothelial permeability to flood the air spaces3,4,5,6,7.

Injury of the epithelial and endothelial layers of the blood-gas barrier could be tested by in vivo alveolar fluid clearance (AFC) and labeled albumin in collected edema fluid specimens, respectively2. In comparison, measurements of nasal potential difference (NPD) are able to identify damaged apical membrane proteins functionally in a fast on-site manner8. This measure is easy to be carried out at both clinic and bedside and well-tolerated by patients9,10,11,12,13,14. This technique has been applied as a routine test for cystic fibrosis to detect abnormal nasal transepithelial potential difference resulted from transepithelial movement of positive and negative charges via hyperactive ENaC and deficient CFTR, respectively. Given that several similar features in epithelial morphology and bioelectric properties are documented between the nasal, the airway, and the alveolar epithelium in mammal, NPD has been applied to ALI and other lung diseases to reflect the transalveolar ion transport activity15. The total or basal NPD was composed of electrogenic transepithelial Na+ and Cl movement-generated ion gradients. To distinguish them, either amiloride, a specific blocker of ENaC, or Na+-free saline was used to eliminate NPD following positive charge flow16,17. To investigate Cl secretion or CFTR activity, either Cl -free Ringer solution or a cAMP-elevating compound was added to the perfusate18,19.

Application of NPD test to lung edema is supported by accumulating preclinical evidence. The baseline NPD of rescued scnn1a deficient mice was reduced by about 50% compared with wild-type mice20. In parallel, the rate of AFC of the rescued scnn1a knockout mice was approximately half that of wild-type litters20. However, the baseline NPD and the rate of AFC of scnn1b or scnn1g deficient mice reduced quite little than those of scnn1a deficient mice21,22. In contrast, gain-of-function Liddle’s mutants increased the baseline NPD and the rate of AFC23. Besides, AFC activated by cAMP-elevating agents was inhibited in CFTR knockout mice24. A marked suppression in amiloride-sensitive alveolar fluid transport was observed in injured lungs, in particularly damaged by systemic hypoxia15. The correlation of impaired machinery of salt and fluid transport across the alveoli and NPD was documented in several preclinical models15. These preclinical studies in gene-manipulating and lung injury models demonstrate a consistent functional alteration between nasal and alveolar transepithelial ion transport, and correlations between ion transport activity and their transcription/translation levels. Clinical studies suggested that transepithelial edema fluid resolution was impaired in ALI/ARDS15,25,26,27.

The aim of this study was to characterize the alterations of NPD in ALI associated with systemic hypoxia. We performed meta-analysis and correlation analysis with pooled data extracted from eleven clinical studies. As the first meta-analysis of the relationship between ion transport activity and severity of ALI, a significant decrease in both total NPD and ENaC fraction was found in HAPE and RDS patients. SpO2 correlated with ENaC-associated NPD in patients but not in healthy controls. Further, SpO2 was inversely associated with fluid secretion or CFTR activity in the respiratory epithelium. Of note, the total NPD values were not proportional to ENaC-contributed fractions. We conclude that ENaC-associated NPD is more sensitive to hypoxia associated ALI/ARDS than other fractions. A clinical trial will further confirm the O2 sensitivity of ENaC, which may be a proper marker of severity and prognosis of edematous lung injury.

Results

Characteristics of included studies

Our detailed procedure for searching and selecting studies are depicted in Fig. 1. Based on the multiple searching strategies, 798 studies were identified. Among of them, 302 studies were removed for duplicates. The remaining 496 articles were screened and 33 full-text literatures were pre-selected. Eleven case-control studies including 4 randomized, placebo-controlled and 7 nonrandomized controlled studies, from the United States, France, German, Swiss, and Finland in last two decades were finally selected per the inclusion criteria. Among these included studies, seven studies were on high altitude pulmonary edema (HAPE)16,18,19,28,29,30,31, and the other four studies on respiratory distress syndrome (RDS)25,27,32,33. These studies encompassed NPD data obtained with a similar recording procedure: basal level → applied amiloride (100 μM) or Na+ -free solution → Cl free medium and CFTR activator, isoproterenol (10 μM) (Table 1). ENaC and CFTR contributed NPD fractions were computed, respectively, as amiloride-sensitive and isoproterenol-activated net NPD fractions. The retrieved studies included 409 persons, 201 were healthy controls, and 208 were HAPE (143) and RDS patients (65). The average range of age for controls and ALI were newborn infants to 41 ± 8 yr, and newborn infant to 46.9 ± 7.8 yr, respectively. There were 218 adults (53.3%) and 191 children or infants (46.7%). Although there was a large span in age between studies, we did not see major discrepancies in the age cohort. To analyze correlations of altitude, SpO2, and NPD, additional data were retrieved16,18,19,25,27,28,29,30,31,32,33 and included in Supplementary Tables 1–3.

Figure 1. Flow diagram of the literature search and selection.

Figure 1

Table 1. Data extracted from selected studies.

Study Diagnosis (N) Age (year) Basal NPD (mV) ENaC NPD (mV) AR NPD (mV) β ENaC α1 Na+/K+- ATPase
Betz T 201518, QRCT Control (14) 38.5 ± 8.3 20.2 ± 5.2 6.6 ± 1.9 13.6 ± 3.9    
HAPE (14) 46.9 ± 7.8 15.5 ± 3.1 4.6 ± 1.8 10.9 ± 2.2    
Kaskinen AK 201619, QRCT Control (44) 2.01 ± 1.8 17.0 ± 5.9* 9.7 ± 4.8* 5.9 ± 6.1* 0.78 ± 0.4* 0.87 ± 0.3*
Hypoxia (39) 0.71 ± 0.6 12.1 ± 5.9* 4.4 ± 4.7* 6.9 ± 5.3* 0.81 ± 0.3* 1.03 ± 0.4*
Maggiorini M 200662, RCT Control (9) 41 ± 8 20 ± 27.8 8.7 ± 5.9 11.3 ± 5.9 42 ± 32 34.3 ± 1.1*
HAPE (9) 41 ± 8 8.8 ± 9.2* 4.1 ± 6.5* 4.3 ± 5.7* 85 ± 72.9* 1.8 ± 0.8*
Mairbäurl H 200329, QRCT Control (12) 40.5 ± 8.6 68.9 ± 37.2 1.1 ± 4 68.1 ± 35    
HAPE (10) 42.4 ± 8.4 47 ± 28.3 2.7 ± 5.5 45.5 ± 29.2    
Peth S 200616, RCT Normal (17) 20–26 17.5 ± 5.7        
Hypoxia (17) 20–26 15.2 ± 5.8        
Sartori C 200230, RCT Control (33) 34 ± 9 25.4 ± 9.6 15.3 ± 7.3 10.1 ± 6.8    
HAPE (33) 36 ± 8 17.2 ± 5.8 10.0 ± 4.6 7.3 ± 5.2    
Sartori C 200431, QRCT Control (29) 31 ± 6 22.9 ± 9.2 12.8 ± 6.6 8.2 ± 5.5    
HAPE (21) 36 ± 8 12.5 ± 6.8 10.3 ± 7.3 5.3 ± 3.1    
Barker PM 199725, QRCT Control (8)   22.0 ± 1.3 6.1 ± 0.6 38.6 ± 0.5    
RDS (21)   16.5 ± 0.6 3.8 ± 0.2 29.5 ± 0.8    
Eisenhut M 200632, QRCT Control (8) 5.64 ± 5.0 24.35 ± 11.9* 15.13 ± 9.9*      
RDS (4) 5.33 ± 5.7 19.25 ± 6.6* 12.5 ± 5.8*      
Thome UH 200633, RCT Control (17) 0.019 11.6 ± 3.7   7.1 ± 2.6    
RDS (12) 0.019 9.4 ± 3.4   5.2 ± 3.2    
Gaillard EA 200727, QRCT Control (10) 0.0027 21.75 ± 7.8* 17.25 ± 6.4*      
RDS (28) 0.0027 16 ± 12.8* 15 ± 10.8*      

Data are presented as mean ± S.D. NPD, nasal potential difference; ENaC, epithelial sodium channels; AR, amiloride-resistant. HAPE, high altitude pulmonary edema; RDS, respiratory distress syndrome. #citation number. N, the number of healthy controls or patients. RCT, randomized placebo-controlled trial; QRCT, quasi-nonrandomized controlled studies.

*Converted from median and range.

Divergent basal NPD between lung injury and healthy controls

All of eleven identified studies16,18,19,25,27,28,29,30,31,32,33 reported basal NPD with I2 values of 42.0% for pooled data, 47.0% for HAPE, and 45% for RDS, indicating insignificant heterogeneity. We therefore applied the fixed-effects model for both the pooled and subgroups of basal NPD data. The meta-analysis revealed that the basal NPD values of pooled studies were significantly lesser than those of healthy control, as shown by the pooled weighted mean difference (WMD) of −5.27 mV (95% CI, −6.03 to −4.52 mV) (P < 0.00001) between two groups (Fig. 2). Moreover, a significant reduction in basal NPD level was seen for both HAPE (−5.69 mV, 95% CI: −7.19 to −4.19 mV) and RDS patients (−5.13 mV, 95% CI: −6.00 to −4.26 mV) as shown in Fig. 2 (P < 0.00001). Identical results are obtained when we further subgroup HAPE and RDS based on the experimental design (data not shown).

Figure 2. Forest plot of the Basal NPD.

Figure 2

The green squares represent the weighted mean difference (WMD) of each study, the horizontal line represents 95% confidence intervals (95% CI), and the black diamond represents the summary of weight mean difference.

ENaC-contributed NPD fraction between lung injury and healthy controls

Nine studies18,19,25,27,28,29,30,31,32 reported the amiloride-sensitive NPD to reflect ENaC activity (Table 1). Combined ENaC-associated NPD of two types of lung injury patients substantially decreased by −2.87 mV (95% CI: −4.02 to −1.72 mV, P < 0.00001) (Fig. 3). Further, the random-effects model was used to analyze whether this decreases in ENaC function occurred in seven HAPE and two RDS studies. A marked drop in amiloride-inhibitable NPD fraction was observed by −3.13 mV (95% CI: −5.12 to −1.15 mV) in HAPE (P = 0.002) and by −2.30 mV (95% CI: −2.72 to −1.88 mV) in RDS (P < 0.00001) (Fig. 3). Identical results are obtained when we further subgroup HAPE and RDS based on the experimental design (data not shown).

Figure 3. Forest plot of the ENaC-associated NPD.

Figure 3

The green squares represent the weighted mean difference (WMD) of each study, the horizontal line represents 95% confidence intervals (95% CI), and the black diamond represents the summary of weight mean difference.

Amiloride-insensitive fraction of NPD: lung injury vs controls

Amiloride-insensitive (or amiloride resistant, AR) NPD was the remaining value in the presence of amiloride. It was the sum of electrogenic cation and anion transport pathways but not ENaC. Pooled AR NPD values of both HAPE and RDS patients in 8 studies18,19,25,28,29,30,31,33 were significantly reduced by −3.91 mV (95% CI: −7.64 to −0.18 mV) compared with those of controls (P = 0.04) (Fig. 4). The AR NPD values of HAPE patients decreased by −2.52 mV (95% CI: −4.67 to −0.37 mV, P = 0.02) (Fig. 4). By comparison, a doubled decrease by −5.58 mV (95% CI: −12.64 to 1.47 mV) but statistically insignificant in AR NPD of 33 RDS patients was found (P = 0.12) (Fig. 4). Identical results are obtained when we further subgroup HAPE and RDS based on the experimental design (data not shown).

Figure 4. Forest plot of the amiloride-resistant NPD.

Figure 4

The green squares represent the weighted mean difference (WMD) of each study, the horizontal line represents 95% confidence intervals (95% CI), and the black diamond represents the summary of weight mean difference.

Altered expression of β ENaC and Na+/K+-ATPase of HAPE

Two HAPE studies19,28 semi-quantitatively detected the transcripts of β ENaC and α1 subunit of Na+/K+-ATPase. Our results show that the slight alterations at the transcriptional level in neither β ENaC nor α1 subunit of Na+/K+-ATPase are significant (P = 0.46 for β ENaC, P = 0.32 for α1 subunit of Na+/K+-ATPase, respectively) (Fig. 5).

Figure 5. Forest plot of the expression of β ENaC (5A) and α1 subunit of Na+/K+-ATPase (5B).

Figure 5

The green squares represent the weighted mean difference (WMD) of each study, the horizontal line represents 95% confidence intervals (95% CI), and the black diamond represents the summary of weight mean difference.

Sensitivity analysis of the meta-analysis

To test the inclusion criteria, we omitted one study25, which did not report patients’ age, to test whether the sensitivity of meta-analysis. The combined SMD for other ten studies estimated by the sensitivity plot (Fig. 6) was 0.81 (−1.02, −0.59). These results indicate that in the overall meta-analysis, no single study significantly changes the combined results, and that the outcomes of meta-analysis are statistically stable and reliable.

Figure 6. Plot of sensitivity analysis of basal NPD values between normal subjects and patients with HAPE and RDS.

Figure 6

Publication bias of the included studies

Given the basal NPD was analyzed by all eleven studies for both patients and normal controls, publication bias of the basal NPD values was analyzed for heterogeneity. Egger’s plot showed no substantial asymmetry (Fig. 7). Egger’s regression test shows an insignificant change in publication bias (t = −1.45, P = 0.182, > 0.05) (Table 2).

Figure 7. Egger’s publication bias plot of the NPD values between healthy controls and lung injury.

Figure 7

MD, mean difference; s.e., standard error.

Table 2. Egger’s test of publication bias between selected studies.

Std eff Coef Std err t P > |t| 95% CI
Slope −0.002 0.641 0.000 0.998 −1.451, 1.448
Bias −2.577 1.782 −1.450 0.182 −6.608, 1.453

Std eff, standard efficiency; Coef, coefficient; Std err, standard error; t, t test; P > |t|, 2-tailed P value; CI, confident intervals.

Correlation of altitude and NPD

To estimate the role of altitude for the incidence of HAPE, we surveyed the association of altitude with other parameters (Table 3). As anticipated, altitude negatively correlated with peripheral blood oxygen saturation level (SpO2) (r = −0.84, P = 0.01), with a well-established SpO2 value of 98% at the sea level for healthy persons. Subsequently, we identified an inverse relationship between altitude and ENaC-associated NPD (r = −0.65, P = 0.01) for HAPE, and a positive association with CFTR-mediated NPD (r = 0.7, P = 0.08) for healthy controls. By comparison, these correlations are less significant statistically in the other groups. There was no association between altitude and amiloride-resistant NPD.

Table 3. Correlations between altitude, SpO2, and NPD level were analyzed with the Pearson’s product-moment correlation (r) of the software R.

Altitude vs r P value df
Control
 Basal NPD 0.28 0.43 8
 ENaC fraction −0.46 0.18 8
 CFTR fraction 0.7 0.08 5
 AR NPD 0.37 0.37 6
HAPE
 Basal NPD −0.06 0.83 12
 ENaC fraction −0.65 0.01 12
 CFTR fraction 0.74 0.26 2
 AR NPD 0.2 0.51 11

The linear regression of SpO2 and altitude is, SpO2 = 98.94−0.006 × altitude. The normal SpO2 value of healthy persons at the sea level is 98.94%. df, degree of freedom.

Correlation of altitude-dependent SpO2 and NPD

Hypoxia is a hallmark of lung injury severity, whereas the effects of altitude may be contributed by hypoxia, low temperature, and exhaustion. To further analyze the contribution of hypoxia, we extracted lab data of SpO2 and computed from altitude, if unavailable, based on their relationship obtained in Table 3 (SpO2 = 98.94 – 0.006 × altitude). Given the causal relationship between pulmonary edema and SpO2 level, the data from patients and controls were analyzed separately (Table 4). SpO2 correlated with ENaC-dependent NPD fraction of HAPE (r = 0.66, P = 0.01), but not for controls. Moreover, SpO2 apparently showed a tendency to correlate with total, CFTR-contributed, and AR NPD fractions reversely.

Table 4. Correlation of altitude-dependent SpO2 and NPD.

SpO2 vs r P value df
Control
 Basal NPD −0.23 0.40 14
 ENaC fraction 0.46 0.14 10
 CFTR fraction −0.60 0.15 5
 AR NPD −0.33 0.36 8
HAPE
 Basal NPD −0.15 0.59 13
 ENaC fraction 0.66 0.01 13
 CFTR fraction −0.69 0.31 2
 AR NPD −0.43 0.13 2

See Table 3 for detailed description. Some values of SpO2 are computed from altitude data by the linear regression of SpO2 and altitude (see Table 3).

Correlation of basal NPD and fractions

Association of basal NPD and fractions associated with cation and anion transport pathways has not been reported. We analyzed their intrinsic relationships (Table 5). Our results show that there is a strong correlation between basal NPD and amiloride-insensitive NPD in both controls (r = 0.97, P = 1.1E-06) and patients (r = 0.97, P = 4.7E-09). In contrast, no significant correlation was found between basal, amiloride-sensitive, and CFTR-associated NPD values. Of note, ENaC-associated NPD might correlate with total reversely and positively, respectively, for healthy controls (r = −0.32) and HAPE (r = 0.13).

Table 5. Correlations of basal and fractional NPD values.

Basal NPD vs r P value df
Control
 ENaC fraction −0.32 0.20 16
 CFTR fraction 0.33 0.47 5
 AR NPD 0.97 1.05E-06 9
HAPE
 ENaC fraction 0.13 0.56 21
 CFTR fraction 0.14 0.86 2
 AR NPD 0.97 4.65E-09 13

Discussion

NPD is one of few clinical assays to examine the transalveolar fluid transport in edematous lung injury. This approach has long been used for cystic fibrosis characterized by an abnormal bioelectrical profile in the airway, however, the feasibility of NPD in alveolar injury remains uncertain. We conducted the meta-analysis of extracted NPD data from eleven published data, and found that baseline NPD in both HAPE and RDS was suppressed significantly. This reduction was partially due to eliminated ENaC activity, which is sensitive to O2 supply. In sharp contrast, cAMP-activated fluid secretion across nasal epithelium, predominately via CFTR was apparently augmented. Our analyses demonstrate that hypoxia associated with ALI inhibits amiloride-sensitive NPD (fluid re-absorption) and stimulates CFTR-associated NPD (chloride secretion).

This systematic review suggests that total NPD could be a great indicator of impaired AFC in HAPE and ARDS. In alveolar epithelial cells, both ENaC and CFTR served as critical pathways for fluid re-absorption in the air spaces2,24. Transepithelial movement of positively charged Na+ ions via apical ENaC and basolateral Na+/K+-ATPase hyperpolarizes the respiratory epithelium. In contrast, cAMP-activated CFTR could transport negatively charged Cl ions bi-directionally to form Cl influx or efflux across the epithelial layer. Thus, CFTR contributes to both fluid secretion and re-absorption. It is worthy to notice that alveolar CFTR removes alveolar fluid in a way similar to ENaC24; whereas CFTR in the airway may mainly contribute to mucus secretion34,35. Although nasal CFTR was activated by a cAMP-elevating agent in the absence of Na+ or presence of amiloride in these selected studies, we do not think this is the scenario of ALI. Under physiological conditions, AFC via CFTR might be injured in HAPE and ARDS. Additionally, the clinical trial for treatment of ALI/ARDS with β receptor agonists failed36,37. Taken together, we believe that the flow of positive charges via ENaC contributes to the reduced NPD significantly in HAPE and ARDS, and that CFTR-contributed NPD fraction cannot be used to reflect AFC (Fig. 8).

Figure 8. Schematic model for reduced NPD in systemic hypoxia-induced lung injury.

Figure 8

The basolateral Na+/K+-ATPase catalytically consumes ATP and provides driving force for Na+ ions to pass through the ENaC channel pores. ENaC molecules themselves were intrinsic O2 sensitive38. However, we cannot rule out the possibility that hypoxia may disrupt mitochondrial bioenergetics and metabolism. If Na+/K+-ATPase does not have enough ATP as substrates, or low O2 influences its capability to catalyze ATP products, amiloride-inhibitable Na+ transport via ENaC will show a significant decrease. On the other hand, O2-sensitive K+ channels modulated ENaC and Na+/K+-ATPase39,40. Indeed, K+ channel modulators altered NPD16. It is conceivable to reason that hypoxia inhibits K+ channels and subsequently leads to dysfunctional vectorial Na+ transport in HAPE and ARDS. Unfortunately, these included studies did not record K+ channel-mediated NPD.

Transcripts of ENaC subunits individually and diversely related to nasal transepithelial ion transport, and only α ENaC subunit was positively correlated with in vivo NPD41. NPD positively related with α ENaC mRNA level, reversely with β ENaC mRNA content, and unrelated with γ ENaC transcripts. Two of included eleven studies measured the expression of β ENaC subunit at the mRNA level19,28. Thus limited data were available to perform meta-analysis and to support the observation that the transcripts of β ENaC were inversely related to NPD41. Moreover, the analysis of α1 subunit of Na+/K+-ATPase only was reported by Maggiorini et al.28. The sample size was too small and the expression of other two critical isoforms was not available. Additional studies are needed for further analysis. Importantly, post-translational modifications of ENaC proteins are crucial in electrically detectable channel activity, e.g., proteolysis of γ ENaC proteins by urokinase42. Evaluation of modified ENaC proteins, for example, cleaved subunits and the status of phosphorylation, are essential to analyze the correlation of ENaC proteins and NPD.

Our analysis shows a potential reserve association between CFTR fraction of NPD and SpO2 or altitude for both controls and HAPE patients (Tables 3, 4, 5). In sharp contrast to ENaC, in vivo CFTR activity, as reflected by cAMP-elevating agent activated Cl secretion tends to be augmented by altitude-dependent hypoxia. These results are apparently inconsistent with previous studies43,44. A mild reduction in CFTR mRNA (semi-quantitative assay) in freshly excised human airway tissues of end-stage lung diseases (hypoxic) compared with normoxic donors was described43. Another in vitro study in murine and human sinonasal epithelial cells reported a significant depression in CFTR-contributed Isc level44. This discrepancy could be due to differences in severity of lung injury (transient HAPE vs end-stage lung diseases). It may be due to the measures functional measures (in vivo NPD) of ion transport across nasal epithelium and total mRNA in excised airway specimens. The mRNA level has various relationships with the function of ENaC proteins in vivo, that is, amiloride-sensitive NPD41. This may be the scenario of in vivo CFTR activity and its transcriptional level. The differences may also result from low temperature at the high altitude. CFTR expression and activity are temperature-dependent45,46, and the responses of CFTR and ENaC to low temperature are opposite47. Our data retrieved from human studies are supported by these in vitro studies. Whether exhaustion of mountain climbers contributes to the diverse observations remains obscure. In HAPE lungs, increased fluid secretion through CFTR combined with reduced re-absorption via ENaC may be a novel pathogenic mechanism for lung edema caused by hypoxia and low temperature (Fig. 8)

Limitations

Some limitations of the study should be taken into consideration when interpreting the results of meta-analysis and correlation analysis. First, heterogeneity was observed in the ENaC-contributed and amiloride-resistant NPD fractions in striking contrast to the pooled basal NPD values. The diversity is most likely due to the reduced sample size. Second, the number of patients and healthy controls was relatively small in each included study. Therefore, a much larger sample size from different ethnic populations is required for future analysis. Third, since the ethnic origins of patients and healthy controls were Caucasian, the results shall be confirmed in other ethnic populations, including Asian, African, Hispanic Americans, and Latino Americans. Finally, our findings cannot be confirmed by the expression of all of four ENaC subunit proteins (α, β, δ, γ) and two Na+/K+-ATPase subunits (α and β) and FXYD proteins due to lack of sufficient original data. Therefore, the results of this study are limited to the sum of transapical and transbasolateral Na+ transport, and cannot be linked to underlying cellular and molecular basis15.

Conclusion

In summary, the present review demonstrates that the decrease in both total NPD and ENaC-associated NPD fraction may be a reflection of impaired edema fluid resolution in HAPE and RDS patients, and that nasal ENaC activity positively correlates with the severity of lung edema, as shown by SpO2 level. The total NPD values may not be proportional to the SpO2 level, as another NPD fraction associated with CFTR is activated by hypoxia. Conclusively, the ENaC fraction of NPD is feasible to predict the fluid resolution in the air sacs. Our findings provide fundamental data for further clinical trials to evaluate edema fluid resolution in HAPE and ARDS with bedside NPD assay, and for mechanistic preclinical studies to examine the effects of hypoxia and inflammatome on the homogeneity of transepithelial ion transport between nasal and alveolar epithelium.

Methods

We conducted our systematic review in accordance with the methods recommended in the PRISMA guidelines.

Literature Search

Four independent investigators searched the potential studies in NCBI PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, Ovid MEDLINE, and Google Scholar before February 2016, using the search strategy: (nasal AND potential difference OR NPD) AND (pulmonary edema OR lung injury OR respiratory distress syndrome OR sepsis OR asthma OR bronchitis OR bronchiectasis OR ENaC OR amiloride OR epithelial OR SCNN1a OR SCNN1b OR SCNN1g OR SCNN1d). Our search was not limited by language, and year and type of publications. Subsequently, we extended our search using (ARDS OR ALI OR RDS OR HAPE) AND (NPD or nasal transepithelial potential difference). When the abstracts of related studies were reviewed and selected, two functions of NCBI PubMed, “Similar articles” and “Cited by PubMed Central articles”, were activated to find additional studies. We collected data from those studies with fully published articles available, not from any conference abstracts. The hits from the aforementioned databases of individual reviewer were finally pooled.

Inclusion Criteria

All eligible studies meet the following criteria: (1) the species was human or humans; (2) the publications were original studies with case-control design, but not review or editorials or commentary; (3) the objectives of at least one group were HAPE and RDS with healthy controls; (4) the data were collected in vivo but not in vitro or ex vivo; (5) there were no statistically significant differences in gender, age, race between control and case groups; and (6) results were expressed or can be converted or digitized to mean ± SD.

Exclusion Criteria

Studies were excluded if they were conference abstracts, case reports, or review articles. The studies of cystic fibrosis or patients with identified CFTR mutants were not included. Studies of allergic rhinitis48, asthma49,50,51, bronchiectasis52,53,54, and COPD55 were excluded due to significant heterogeneity, less than two studies to perform meta-analysis, or diversity in recording procedures for NPD. Of note, these three airway diseases are not characterized by systemic hypoxia and are local dysfunctions of the airway, but not the lung.

Data Extraction

The selected studies used a similar procedure to record NPD. Basal NPD value was obtained with physiological saline (i.e., Ringer’s solution), followed by application of amiloride (100 μM) or Na+ free solution to inhibit ENaC, low or Cl free perfusates to eliminate Cl transport, and finally a cAMP-elevating agent, isoproterenol (10 μM) to detect CFTR-mediated Cl secretion. Original data (mean ± SD) of basal (or maximal or total) NPD, NPD values at the presence of amiloride (AR) or Na+-free Ringer solution, application of isoproterenol in low Cl or Cl free perfusates, computed NPD fractions for ENaC and CFTR were retrieved for both healthy controls and patients. If the disease group was further classified into mild, moderate, and severe, the data for severe subjects was collected. For the studies representing NPD values as median and interquartile range19, we converted the data to SD using the formula of SD = (Q75 − Q25)/1.35, when n > 25, the median can be used to estimate mean directly56. If the data was represented by mean and 95% confident interval (CI), then Inline graphic, where t is calculated as the function of tinv (0.05, N-1)56, N is the sample size, U is the upper limit, L is the lower limit. If the data was showed by median and range27,32, then mean = (a + 2m + b)/4, and SD2 = 1/12 ((a − 2m + b)2/4 + (b − a)2), where m is median, a and b are lower and upper of the range, respectively57. For studies representing data as plots or graphs18,29, we retrieved data using GetData Graph Digitizer, v2.26 (http://getdata-graph-digitizer.com/).

Statistical Analysis

We pooled weighted mean differences (WMDs) of NPD values, altitude, SpO2, ENaC and Na+/K+-ATPase expression level from eligible studies, which were identified with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Heterogeneity of extracted data was assessed using the Cochran’s Q statistic as the P-value and I-square statistic (I2) in the pooled analyses, representing the percentage of total variation across studies58. If the P-value was less than 0.05, or the I2-value was greater than 50%, the summary estimate was analyzed in a random-effects model. Otherwise, a fixed-effects model was applied. Bias between selected studies was detected using the visual symmetry of funnel plots58. Asymmetrical distribution of data suggests possible publication bias. Publication bias was assessed by observing the symmetry of funnel plots with the Begg’s adjusted rank correlation test and Egger’s test59. The stability of the results was confirmed by sensitivity analysis. Key finding of meta-analysis using both STATA v.11 (StatCorp. College Station, TX) and Review Manager (RevMan) for Window, version 5.3 (Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014) were confirmed by another independent investigator with program R60.

Correlation Analysis

Correlation analyses were carried out using R software, the correlation coefficient was computed based on t test evaluation after Pearson’s product-moment. As SpO2 is negatively correlated with altitude61, it was considered as a positive control, the correlation co-efficient and P value of which are criteria for significance.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Su, Z. et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of nasal potential difference in hypoxia-induced lung injury. Sci. Rep. 6, 30780; doi: 10.1038/srep30780 (2016).

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Information
srep30780-s1.pdf (61.1KB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the American Heart Association (Award 14GRNT20130034 and 16GRNT27490027 to H.L.J. and R.Z.Z.), institutional funds, a Post-Doctoral Fellowship (to J.W.), and a Pre-Doctoral Fellowship (to Z.L.S.).

Footnotes

Author Contributions H.L.J. and R.Z.Z. participated in the design of the study. Z.L.S., L.L.Z. and J.W. performed the statistical analysis, interpreted the data and drafted the manuscript. All of authors contributed to the interpretation of the data and critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content. H.L.J. gave final approval of the version to be published and is accountable for all aspects of the work. Each individual author read and approved the final manuscript.

References

  1. Matthay M. A., Ware L. B. & Zimmerman G. A. The acute respiratory distress syndrome. J Clin Invest 122, 2731–2740, doi: 10.1172/JCI60331 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Matthay M. A., Clerici C. & Saumon G. Invited review: Active fluid clearance from the distal air spaces of the lung. J Appl Physiol (1985) 93, 1533–1541, doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01210.2001 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bhagi S., Srivastava S. & Singh S. B. High-altitude pulmonary edema: review. J Occup Health 56, 235–243 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Wu A. L. et al. Correlation between single nucleotide polymorphisms in hypoxia-related genes and susceptibility to acute high-altitude pulmonary edema. Genet Mol Res 14, 11562–11572, doi: 10.4238/2015.September.28.8 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Swenson E. R. et al. Pathogenesis of high-altitude pulmonary edema: inflammation is not an etiologic factor. JAMA 287, 2228–2235 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Swenson E. R. & Bartsch P. High-altitude pulmonary edema. Compr Physiol 2, 2753–2773, doi: 10.1002/cphy.c100029 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Planes C. et al. Hypoxia downregulates expression and activity of epithelial sodium channels in rat alveolar epithelial cells. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 17, 508–518, doi: 10.1165/ajrcmb.17.4.2680 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Schuler D. et al. Basic protocol for transepithelial nasal potential difference measurements. J Cyst Fibros 3 Suppl 2, 151–155, doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2004.05.032 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Knowles M. R., Carson J. L., Collier A. M., Gatzy J. T. & Boucher R. C. Measurements of nasal transepithelial electric potential differences in normal human subjects in vivo. Am Rev Respir Dis 124, 484–490 (1981). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Mason N. P. et al. Serial changes in nasal potential difference and lung electrical impedance tomography at high altitude. J Appl Physiol (1985) 94, 2043–2050, doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00777.2002 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Wanner A. Clinical aspects of mucociliary transport. Am Rev Respir Dis 116, 73–125, doi: 10.1164/arrd.1977.116.1.73 (1977). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Quinlan M. F., Salman S. D., Swift D. L., Wagner H. N. Jr. & Proctor D. F. Measurement of mucociliary function in man. Am Rev Respir Dis 99, 13–23, doi: 10.1164/arrd.1969.99.1.13 (1969). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lorin M. I., Gaerlan P. F. & Mandel I. D. Quantitative composition of nasal secretions in normal subjects. J Lab Clin Med 80, 275–281 (1972). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Mairbaurl H. Role of alveolar epithelial sodium transport in high altitude pulmonary edema (HAPE). Respir Physiol Neurobiol 151, 178–191, doi: S1569-9048(05)00272-7 [pii] 10.1016/j.resp.2005.11.001 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Mac Sweeney R., Fischer H. & McAuley D. F. Nasal potential difference to detect Na+ channel dysfunction in acute lung injury. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 300, L305–L318, doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00223.2010 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Peth S., Karle C., Dehnert C., Bartsch P. & Mairbaurl H. K+ channel activation with minoxidil stimulates nasal-epithelial ion transport and blunts exaggerated hypoxic pulmonary hypertension. High Alt Med Biol 7, 54–63, doi: 10.1089/ham.2006.7.54 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Gowen C. W. Jr. et al. Electrical potential difference and ion transport across nasal epithelium of term neonates: correlation with mode of delivery, transient tachypnea of the newborn, and respiratory rate. J Pediatr 113, 121–127 (1988). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Betz T., Dehnert C., Bartsch P., Schommer K. & Mairbaurl H. Does high alveolar fluid reabsorption prevent HAPE in individuals with exaggerated pulmonary hypertension in hypoxia? High Alt Med Biol 16, 283–289, doi: 10.1089/ham.2015.0050 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kaskinen A. K. et al. Chronic hypoxemia in children with congenital heart defect impairs airway epithelial sodium transport. Pediatr Crit Care Med 17, 45–52, doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000568 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Egli M. et al. Defective respiratory amiloride-sensitive sodium transport predisposes to pulmonary oedema and delays its resolution in mice. J Physiol 560, 857–865, doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2004.066704 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Barker P. M. et al. Role of gammaENaC subunit in lung liquid clearance and electrolyte balance in newborn mice. Insights into perinatal adaptation and pseudohypoaldosteronism. J Clin Invest 102, 1634–1640, doi: 10.1172/JCI3971 (1998). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. McDonald F. J. et al. Disruption of the beta subunit of the epithelial Na+ channel in mice: hyperkalemia and neonatal death associated with a pseudohypoaldosteronism phenotype. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96, 1727–1731 (1999). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Randrianarison N. et al. beta-Liddle mutation of the epithelial sodium channel increases alveolar fluid clearance and reduces the severity of hydrostatic pulmonary oedema in mice. J Physiol 582, 777–788, doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2007.131078 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Fang X. et al. Novel role for CFTR in fluid absorption from the distal airspaces of the lung. J Gen Physiol 119, 199–207 (2002). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Barker P. M., Gowen C. W., Lawson E. E. & Knowles M. R. Decreased sodium ion absorption across nasal epithelium of very premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome. J Pediatr 130, 373–377 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Smith L. S., Zimmerman J. J. & Martin T. R. Mechanisms of acute respiratory distress syndrome in children and adults: a review and suggestions for future research. Pediatr Crit Care Med 14, 631–643, doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e318291753f (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Gaillard E. A., Shaw N. J., Wallace H. L., Vince G. & Southern K. W. Electrical potential difference across the nasal epithelium is reduced in premature infants with chronic lung disease but is not associated with lower airway inflammation. Pediatr Res 61, 77–82, doi: 10.1203/01.pdr.0000250035.10339.ce (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Maggiorini M. et al. Both tadalafil and dexamethasone may reduce the incidence of high-altitude pulmonary edema Ann Intern Med 145, 497–506 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Mairbaurl H. et al. Nasal epithelium potential difference at high altitude (4,559 m): evidence for secretion. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 167, 862–867, doi: 10.1164/rccm.200208-864OC (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Sartori C. et al. Salmeterol for the prevention of high-altitude pulmonary edema. N Engl J Med 346, 1631–1636, doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa013183 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Sartori C. et al. High altitude impairs nasal transepithelial sodium transport in HAPE-prone subjects. Eur Respir J 23, 916–920 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Eisenhut M. et al. Pulmonary edema in meningococcal septicemia associated with reduced epithelial chloride transport. Pediatr Crit Care Med 7, 119–124, doi: 10.1097/01.PCC.0000200944.98424.E0 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Thome U. H., Bischoff A., Maier L., Pohlandt F. & Trotter A. Amiloride-sensitive nasal potential difference is not changed by estradiol and progesterone replacement but relates to BPD or death in a randomized trial on preterm infants. Pediatr Res 60, 619–623, doi: 10.1203/01.pdr.0000242262.55324.aa (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Jiang C., Finkbeiner W. E., Widdicombe J. H., McCray P. B. Jr. & Miller S. S. Altered fluid transport across airway epithelium in cystic fibrosis. Science 262, 424–427 (1993). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Ratjen F. Restoring airway surface liquid in cystic fibrosis. N Engl J Med 354, 291–293, doi: 10.1056/NEJMe058293 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. National Heart L. et al. Randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial of an aerosolized beta(2)-agonist for treatment of acute lung injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 184, 561–568, doi: 10.1164/rccm.201012-2090OC (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Gao Smith F. et al. Effect of intravenous beta-2 agonist treatment on clinical outcomes in acute respiratory distress syndrome (BALTI-2): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 379, 229–235, doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61623-1 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Wang S., Publicover S. & Gu Y. An oxygen-sensitive mechanism in regulation of epithelial sodium channel. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106, 2957–2962, doi: 10.1073/pnas.0809100106 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Han D. Y. et al. K+ channel openers restore verapamil-inhibited lung fluid resolution and transepithelial ion transport. Respir Res 11, 65, doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-11-65 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Thome U. H., Davis I. C., Nguyen S. V., Shelton B. J. & Matalon S. Modulation of sodium transport in fetal alveolar epithelial cells by oxygen and corticosterone. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 284, L376–L385, doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00218.2002 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Otulakowski G. et al. Relation between alpha, beta, and gamma human amiloride- sensitive epithelial Na+ channel mRNA levels and nasal epithelial potential difference in healthy men. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 158, 1213–1220, doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.158.4.9710069 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Ji H. L. et al. Proteolytic regulation of epithelial sodium channels by urokinase plasminogen activator: cutting edge and cleavage sites. J Biol Chem 290, 5241–5255, doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.623496 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Guimbellot J. S. et al. Role of oxygen availability in CFTR expression and function. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 39, 514–521, doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2007-0452OC (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Woodworth B. A. Resveratrol ameliorates abnormalities of fluid and electrolyte secretion in a hypoxia-Induced model of acquired CFTR deficiency. Laryngoscope 125 Suppl 7, S1–S13, doi: 10.1002/lary.25335 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Qadri Y. J. et al. Low temperature and chemical rescue affect molecular proximity of DeltaF508-cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) and epithelial sodium channel (ENaC). J Biol Chem 287, 16781–16790, doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.332031 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Rennolds J., Boyaka P. N., Bellis S. L. & Cormet-Boyaka E. Low temperature induces the delivery of mature and immature CFTR to the plasma membrane. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 366, 1025–1029, doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.12.065 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Chraibi A. & Horisberger J. D. Na self inhibition of human epithelial Na channel: temperature dependence and effect of extracellular proteases. J Gen Physiol 120, 133–145 (2002). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Suzumura E. & Takeuchi K. Antigen reduces nasal transepithelial electric potential differences and alters ion transport in allergic rhinitis in vivo. Acta Oto-Laryngologica 112, 552–558, doi: 10.3109/00016489209137439 (1992). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Chung N. C., Illek B., Widdicombe J. H. & Fischer H. Measurement of nasal potential difference in mild asthmatics. Chest 123, 1467–1471 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Nichol G. M. et al. Effect of inhaled furosemide on metabisulfite- and methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction and nasal potential difference in asthmatic subjects. Am Rev Respir Dis 142, 576–580 (1990). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Schmitt L. et al. Exercise reduces airway sodium ion reabsorption in cystic fibrosis but not in exercise asthma. Eur Respir J 37, 342–348, doi: 10.1183/09031936.00197309 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Alton E. W., Hay J. G., Munro C. & Geddes D. M. Measurement of nasal potential difference in adult cystic fibrosis, Young’s syndrome, and bronchiectasis. Thorax 42, 815–817 (1987). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Bienvenu T. et al. Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator channel dysfunction in non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 181, 1078–1084, doi: 10.1164/rccm.200909-1434OC (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Danner I., Boisseau P., Chailleux E. & Escande D. Respiratory epithelial ion transport in patients with disseminated bronchiectasis. Eur Respir J 13, 1276–1280 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Sloane P. A. et al. A pharmacologic approach to acquired cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator dysfunction in smoking related lung disease. PLoS One 7, e39809, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039809 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. http://handbook.cochrane.org/chapter_7/7_7_3_2_.htm.
  57. Hozo S. P., Djulbegovic B. & Hozo I. Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol 5, 13, doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-5-13 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Higgins J. P., Thompson S. G., Deeks J. J. & Altman D. G. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 327, 557–560, doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 (2003). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Egger M., Davey Smith G., Schneider M. & Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 315, 629–634 (1997). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. R Core Team. A Language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. www.R-project.org (Vienna, Austria, 2016) . [Google Scholar]
  61. Pomeroy E. et al. Associations between arterial oxygen saturation, body size and limb measurements among high-altitude Andean children. Am J Hum Biol 25, 629–636, doi: 10.1002/ajhb.22422 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Maggiorini M. et al. Both tadalafil and dexamethasone may reduce the incidence of high-altitude pulmonary edema: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 145, 497–506 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information
srep30780-s1.pdf (61.1KB, pdf)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES