Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Clinical Pathology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Pathology
. 1982 Oct;35(10):1158–1162. doi: 10.1136/jcp.35.10.1158

The use of an anaerobic incubator for the isolation of anaerobes from clinical samples.

P L Berry, E Taylor, I Phillips
PMCID: PMC497902  PMID: 6752210

Abstract

An anaerobic incubator was compared with a standard jar system for the isolation of anaerobes from clinical material. Seventy specimens were selected as likely to yield anaerobes: 342 different anaerobes were isolated in the incubator and 347 in anaebrobic jars. These included Bacteroides spp (43%), Peptococcus spp (26%), Peptostreptococcus spp (13%), Veillonella spp (7%), Fusobacterium spp (7%), Clostridium spp (2%) and miscellaneous Gram-positive nonsporing bacilli (2%). Differences in isolation rates for each system were inconsistent and minor. Sixteen anaerobes were chosen for quantitative tests at the beginning and end of the study period. Miles and Misra counts showed a slight advantage of the incubator for F nucleatum, but no difference for B fragilis, B thetaiomicron, B uniformis, B bivius, B corrodens, F mortiferum, Ps anaerobius, P prevotii or Propionibacterium acnes. In almost all cases, colonies in anaerobic jars were slightly larger than those in the incubator. Disc antibiotic sensitivity tests gave the same results in each system, at the beginning and end of the study period. The anaerobic incubator provides an effective means of isolation of anaerobes in a clinical laboratory. However, several design features of the prototype would require change if the system were introduced.

Full text

PDF
1158

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Brewer J. H., Allgeier D. L. Safe Self-contained Carbon Dioxide-Hydrogen Anaerobic System. Appl Microbiol. 1966 Nov;14(6):985–988. doi: 10.1128/am.14.6.985-988.1966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Dowell V. R., Jr Comparison of techniques for isolation and identification of anaerobic bacteria. Am J Clin Nutr. 1972 Dec;25(12):1335–1343. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/25.12.1335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ferguson I. R., Phillips K. D., Willis A. T. An evaluation of the 'GasKit' disposable hydrogen and carbon dioxide generator for the culture of anaerobic bacteria. J Appl Bacteriol. 1976 Dec;41(3):433–437. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1976.tb00656.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gargan R. A., Phillips I. Performance of converted pressure cookers and two conventional jars for anaerobic bacterial culture. J Clin Pathol. 1978 May;31(5):426–429. doi: 10.1136/jcp.31.5.426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ingham H. R., Selkon J. B., Codd A. A., Hale J. H. The effect of carbon dioxide on the sensitivity of Bacteroides fragilis to certain antibiotics in vitro. J Clin Pathol. 1970 Apr;23(3):254–258. doi: 10.1136/jcp.23.3.254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Killgore G. E., Starr S. E., Del Bene V. E., Whaley D. N., Dowell V. R., Jr Comparison of three anaerobic systems for the isolation of anaerobic bacteria from clinical specimens. Am J Clin Pathol. 1973 Apr;59(4):552–559. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/59.4.552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Martin W. J. Isolation and indentification of anaerobic bacteria in the clinical laboratory. A 2-year experience. Mayo Clin Proc. 1974 May;49(5):300–308. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. McMinn M. T., Crawford J. J. Recovery of anaerobic microorganisms from clinical specimens in prereduced media versus recovery by routine clinical laboratory methods. Appl Microbiol. 1970 Feb;19(2):207–213. doi: 10.1128/am.19.2.207-213.1970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Moore W. E., Cato E. P., Holdeman L. V. Anaerobic bacteria of the gastrointestinal flora and their occurrence in clinical infections. J Infect Dis. 1969 Jun;119(6):641–649. doi: 10.1093/infdis/119.6.641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Morgan J. R., Smith J. A., Liu P. Improving the performance of anaerobic bacteriology in a hospital laboratory. J Clin Pathol. 1977 Feb;30(2):157–159. doi: 10.1136/jcp.30.2.157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Myers M. B., Cherry G., Bornside B. B., Bornside G. H. Ultaviolet red fluorescence of Bacteroides melaninogenicus. Appl Microbiol. 1969 May;17(5):760–762. doi: 10.1128/am.17.5.760-762.1969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Phillips I., Warren C. Susceptibility of Bacteroides fragilis to spectinomycin. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1975 Mar;1(1):91–95. doi: 10.1093/jac/1.1.91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Rosenblatt J. E., Fallon A., Finegold S. M. Comparison of methods for isolation of anaerobic bacteria from clinical specimens. Appl Microbiol. 1973 Jan;25(1):77–85. doi: 10.1128/am.25.1.77-85.1973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Watt B., Brown F. V. Letter: Sensitivity testing of anaerobes on solid media. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1975 Dec;1(4):440–442. doi: 10.1093/jac/1.4.440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Watt B., Hoare M. V., Collee J. G. Some variables affecting the recovery of anaerobic bacteria: a quantitative study. J Gen Microbiol. 1973 Aug;77(2):447–454. doi: 10.1099/00221287-77-2-447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Wren M. W., Baldwin A. W., Eldon C. P., Sanderson P. J. The anaerobic culture of clinical specimens: a 14-month study. J Med Microbiol. 1977 Feb;10(1):49–61. doi: 10.1099/00222615-10-1-49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Pathology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES