ABSTRACT
Candida glabrata causes persistent infections in patients treated with fluconazole and often acquires resistance following exposure to the drug. Here we found that clinical strains of C. glabrata exhibit cell-to-cell variation in drug response (heteroresistance). We used population analysis profiling (PAP) to assess fluconazole heteroresistance (FLCHR) and to ask if it is a binary trait or a continuous phenotype. Thirty (57.6%) of 52 fluconazole-sensitive clinical C. glabrata isolates met accepted dichotomous criteria for FLCHR. However, quantitative grading of FLCHR by using the area under the PAP curve (AUC) revealed a continuous distribution across a wide range of values, suggesting that all isolates exhibit some degree of heteroresistance. The AUC correlated with rhodamine 6G efflux and was associated with upregulation of the CDR1 and PDH1 genes, encoding ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transmembrane transporters, implying that HetR populations exhibit higher levels of drug efflux. Highly FLCHR C. glabrata was recovered more frequently than nonheteroresistant C. glabrata from hematogenously infected immunocompetent mice following treatment with high-dose fluconazole (45.8% versus 15%, P = 0.029). Phylogenetic analysis revealed some phenotypic clustering but also variations in FLCHR within clonal groups, suggesting both genetic and epigenetic determinants of heteroresistance. Collectively, these results establish heteroresistance to fluconazole as a graded phenotype associated with ABC transporter upregulation and fluconazole efflux. Heteroresistance may explain the propensity of C. glabrata for persistent infection and the emergence of breakthrough resistance to fluconazole.
IMPORTANCE
Heteroresistance refers to variability in the response to a drug within a clonal cell population. This phenomenon may have crucial importance for the way we look at antimicrobial resistance, as heteroresistant strains are not detected by standard laboratory susceptibility testing and may be associated with failure of antimicrobial therapy. We describe for the first time heteroresistance to fluconazole in C. glabrata, a finding that may explain the propensity of this pathogen to acquire resistance following exposure to fluconazole and to persist despite treatment. We found that, rather than being a binary all-or-none trait, heteroresistance was a continuously distributed phenotype associated with increased expression of genes that encode energy-dependent drug efflux transporters. Moreover, we show that heteroresistance is associated with failure of fluconazole to clear infection with C. glabrata. Together, these findings provide an empirical framework for determining and quantifying heteroresistance in C. glabrata.
INTRODUCTION
Candida glabrata is an important opportunistic pathogen notable for its intrinsic tendency to develop resistance to antifungal drugs. Specifically, C. glabrata isolates are inhibited by higher concentrations of fluconazole and other azoles than most other Candida species (1) and are frequently resistant to this class of drugs (2, 3). Azole resistance is usually associated with upregulation of transmembrane ATP-binding cassette (ABC) drug transporters (4, 5). These characteristics have been the basis of recommendations to prefer echinocandins as the front-line treatment for C. glabrata and to use maximal doses of fluconazole for the treatment of apparently azole-sensitive isolates (6, 7). Importantly, echinocandin resistance is also emerging (8, 9), implying that the prospect of multidrug-resistant C. glabrata may soon become a reality (10).
A striking characteristic of C. glabrata is the ability of seemingly susceptible strains to become fully azole resistant during fluconazole treatment (4). The emergence of drug resistance during treatment implies the existence of nonsusceptible subpopulations within a predominantly susceptible isogenic microbial population. This phenomenon, known as heteroresistance (HR), has been described in Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial pathogens, in Mycobacterium tuberculosis (11–13), and in the pathogenic yeast Cryptococcus neoformans (14). When heteroresistant strains are serially cultured on media containing inhibitory concentrations of an antimicrobial drug, each generation exhibits variable drug responses but the nonsusceptible subpopulation gradually expands and fully resistant colonies will ultimately emerge. Population analysis profiling (PAP) assays are considered the gold standard for determining HR (13). In a wider context, HR is a manifestation of bet hedging, a mechanism whereby genetically identical cells express different phenotypic profiles, thus increasing the probability of survival during stressful fluctuations of environmental conditions (15). Potential implications of HR include treatment failure, relapse, and the establishment of persistent chronic infection (13). HR is generally not detected in standard broth microdilution susceptibility assays, and failure to detect HR may result in misclassification of nonsusceptible strains as susceptible by clinical microbiology laboratories. However, the lack of a standardized definition of HR complicates attempts to determine the clinical importance of this phenomenon (13).
We explored fluconazole HR (FLCHR) in C. glabrata by performing PAP of clinical isolates. We then tested the gene expression and function of ABC drug transporters in C. glabrata strains exhibiting different degrees of FLCHR. Finally, we determined the effect of HR on in vivo survival during fluconazole treatment. Our results demonstrate that fluconazole HR is a continuously distributed phenotype in C. glabrata clinical isolates. The area under the PAP curve provides a quantitative measurement of FLCHR and correlates with ATP-dependent efflux transporter activity. Importantly, FLCHR is not detected by routine susceptibility testing methods and could be an important factor underlying treatment failure.
RESULTS
Drug susceptibility population distribution analysis.
The fluconazole susceptibility characteristics of 52 C. glabrata clinical isolates and three reference strains (median fluconazole MIC of 2 mg/liter; range, 0.25 to 16 mg/liter; see Table S1 in the supplemental material) were determined by PAP. PAP assays were analyzed using the heterogeneity range (HR) method, which categorizes strains in a dichotomous fashion as fluconazole heteroresistant (FLCHR) or nonheteroresistant (FLCN), and by using the area under the curve (AUC) ratio (AUCR), which provides a continuous measurement of heterogeneity (Fig. 1). AUCRs ranged from 0.00012 to 13.74 (median 0.46; interquartile range, 0.10 to 1.12; Fig. 2A). Correlating the AUCR with fluconazole dose-response heterogeneity showed a partition between AUCRs for HRs of <16 and ≥16. Specifically, the median AUCR was 0.09 (range, 0.00012 to 0.41) for an HR of <16 and 0.96 (0.25 to 13.74) for an HR of ≥16 (P < 0.0001; Fig. 2B). An AUCR breakpoint of 0.43 categorized 28 (93%) of 30 strains with an HR of ≥16 as FLCHR and 24 (96%) of 25 strains with an HR of <16 as FLCN. However, for each HR value of ≥16, the AUCRs varied up to 30-fold: 0.25 to 5.85 for an HR of 16, 0.42 to 13.74 for an HR of 32, and 1.66 to 8.32 for an HR of 64 (Fig. 2). This indicates that rather than being a bimodally distributed phenotype, FLCHR is a continuously distributed trait in C. glabrata. In all, 30 (57.6%) of 52 clinical C. glabrata isolates were FLCHR according to an HR breakpoint of ≥16. Population fluconazole susceptibility profiles were stable for each strain, with minimal variation in fluconazole AUCRs after >10 passages on fluconazole-free medium (data not shown). The fluconazole MIC was slightly but significantly higher for FLCHR strains than for FLCN strains (MIC50 [interquartile range], 2 [1 to 4] µg/ml versus 1 [1 to 2] µg/ml; P = 0.02).
To determine the prevalence of HR to echinocandins, we performed caspofungin and anidulafungin PAP assays of all of our C. glabrata isolates. All of the isolates tested had a heterogeneity range of 2 to 4 for echinocandins, indicating no significant HR to these drugs. There was no difference in echinocandin HR among isolates that were FLCN, FLCHR, and fluconazole resistant (Fig. 3). All of our C. glabrata isolates grew on 2% (wt/vol) glycerol as the sole carbon source, indicating the absence of mitochondrial mutations leading to respiration-defective (petite) mutants (16).
Rhodamine 6G efflux and accumulation correlate with HR.
We measured the glucose-dependent efflux activity of ABC-type transporters in representative FLCHR and FLCN C. glabrata strains with the rhodamine 6G assay (17). As expected of ABC transporters, rhodamine 6G efflux, determined by relative fluorescence in supernatants, occurred rapidly after the addition of glucose to yeast cell suspensions and was absent from glucose-free controls (Fig. 4). Glucose-dependent rhodamine 6G efflux was significantly higher in FLCHR strains than in FLCN strains (P < 0.001; Fig. 4). However, rhodamine 6G efflux activity varied markedly within the FLCN and FLCHR categories, with no clear breakpoint between FLCN and FLCHR strains, as defined by heterogeneity range criteria. Moreover, rhodamine 6G efflux correlated positively and linearly with the degree of FLCHR, expressed as the AUCR (r2 = 0.68, P = 0.0021; Fig. 4).
Evaluation of rhodamine 6G retention in yeast cells by fluorescence microscopy allows visual assessment of efflux activity within a cell population. There was cell-to-cell variation in rhodamine 6G accumulation within both FLCHR and FLCN populations (Fig. 5). However, the proportion of cells stained with rhodamine 6G following a 25-min incubation in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) with 8 mM glucose was lower for the FLCHR strain than for the FLCN strain. Accumulation of rhodamine 6G was almost absent from FLCR cells and was lower than that in both FLCHR and FLCN strains (Fig. 5).
Taken together, these results indicate that the fluconazole AUCR of a given C. glabrata strain reflects the overall ABC transporter efflux activity of the cell population, which in turn is an expression of the proportion of cells with increased efflux activity.
Individual ABC transporter genes are upregulated in a binary manner in FLCHR strains.
We compared the ACT1-normalized expression of the three azole efflux transporter genes (CDR1, PDH1, SNQ2) and the ABC transport regulator gene PDR1 among FLCN (n = 4), FLCHR (n = 6), and FLCR (n = 2) C. glabrata strains (Fig. 6). As expected, in FLCR strains, CDR1 expression was dramatically higher than in both FLCN and FLCHR strains (mean expression, 47.6-fold ± 19.8-fold; P < 0.0001) (Fig. 6). Modest but significant increases in CDR1 expression levels were observed in four of six FLCHR strains, whereas none of four FLCN strains had increased CDR1 expression (mean expression, 2.32-fold ± 0.04-fold and 1.43-fold ± 0.19-fold, respectively; P = 0.028). In addition, PDH1 expression was significantly increased in five of six FLCHR strains versus none of the FLCN strains (mean expression, 2.63-fold ± 0.56-fold versus 1.29-fold ± 0.37-fold; P = 0.015). In sum, four of six FLCHR strains upregulated both CDR1 and PDH1 and an additional FLCHR strain upregulated PDH1 alone (Fig. 6). In contrast, there was no significant difference in the expression of SNQ2 and PDR1 between FLCN and FLCHR strains, suggesting that transporters other than Cdr1 and Pdh1 (Snq2 and the Pdr1 transcription factor) do not play a major role in FLCHR.
Unlike fluconazole efflux, expression of CDR1 and PDH1 was not linearly related to the fluconazole AUCR. The fold expression values of both genes were distributed bimodally among FLCHR and FLCN strains, suggesting dichotomous “on-off” states of gene expression (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). Both FLCHR strains that did not upregulate CDR1 had low rhodamine 6G efflux activity (see Fig. S1). Upregulation of CDR1 and PDH1 was associated with high values of rhodamine 6G efflux, but the difference from that in strains not upregulating these genes did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.1; see Fig. S1).
Preexposure to fluconazole (8 or 64 mg/liter) resulted in significant upregulation of CDR1 expression in two FLCHR strains: Cg2268, which upregulated CDR1 at the baseline (2.8-fold increase in CDR1 expression following preexposure; P < 0.0001), and Cg1922, which did not upregulate CDR1 at the baseline (50% increase in expression; P = 0.008; Fig. 6). There was no significant effect of fluconazole exposure on the CDR1 expression of two other FLCHR strains. In contrast, PDH1 expression in all FLCHR strains preexposed to fluconazole was reduced to 38 to 70% of the baseline values (Fig. 6). The expression levels of both SNQ2 and PDR1 following preexposure to fluconazole remained well below the 2-fold threshold for all FLCHR strains, indicating that CDR1 upregulation in FLCHR strains is not mediated through altered Pdr1 levels (18). Rhodamine 6G efflux increased in all C. glabrata strains after incubation with fluconazole, but the increase was more rapid and pronounced in strain Cg2268 than in FLCN strains Cg304 and Cg1775 (65% increase [P <0.0001] versus 26 to 51% increase [P = 0.01]; Fig. 6C). Thus, upregulation of CDR1 by fluconazole preexposure was associated with enhanced rhodamine 6G efflux.
Sequencing of PDR1 in six FLCHR strains and four FLCN strains revealed seven nonsynonymous mutations in the coding sequence (see Table S2 in the supplemental material). PDR1 mutations were detected in three of six FLCHR strains and two of four FLCN strains. These mutations were not associated with a gain-of-function phenotype and did not corresponded to previously described PDR1 gain-of-function substitutions (19–21).
HR is associated with persistence of viable C. glabrata cells in mouse kidney tissue during fluconazole treatment.
To determine whether FLCHR correlates with failure of fluconazole to eliminate C. glabrata from visceral tissue, we assessed the viable fungal burdens (in numbers of CFU per gram of tissue) in mouse kidneys 7 days after intravenous inoculation. High-dose fluconazole treatment (100 mg/kg/day) significantly reduced the tissue fungal burdens of FLCN and FLCHR C. glabrata-infected mice (P < 0.0001) and, as expected, had no effect on FLCR C. glabrata-infected mouse tissue fungal burdens (Fig. 7). Individual mice with persistent C. glabrata infection after 7 days of fluconazole treatment could be detected in both the FLCN and FLCHR infection groups. Persistent infection manifested itself as high tissue fungal burdens approaching those observed in untreated mice (2.0 × 105 ± 7 × 104 and 8.6 × 105 ± 1.6 × 105 CFU/g, respectively; Fig. 7). Importantly, the frequency with which persistent infection was detected was higher in fluconazole-treated mice infected with a highly FLCHR strain (11 of 24 mice, 45.8%) than in fluconazole-treated mice infected with an FLCN strain (3 of 20 mice, 15%) (P = 0.029), despite both strains having fluconazole MICs in the susceptible range.
FLCHR is variable within phylogenetic clusters.
Comparison of the PAP phenotypes and phylogenetic relationships determined from intergenic spacer (IGS) sequences showed clusters of C. glabrata strains with similar phenotypes, as well as variable AUCRs, among closely related strains (Fig. 8). Two clusters (A and C) were composed of closely related FLCHR strains. Interestingly, both clusters also contained FLCR strains (one in cluster A and two in cluster C). The six fully fluconazole-resistant strains included in this analysis did not cluster with each other; four of the FLCR strains were found within clusters shared by FLCHR strains, and two strains were singletons (Fig. 8).
Population heat mapping of C. glabrata strains according to AUCRs showed that closely related C. glabrata strains often have divergent AUCRs (clusters A, B, C, F, and G; Fig. 8). In sum, phylogenetic analysis shows both phenotypic clustering and dynamic changes in the fluconazole susceptibility patterns of related C. glabrata strains.
DISCUSSION
Stochastic cell-to-cell variation in gene expression within genetically identical populations is a postulated mechanism for microbial survival under fluctuating environmental conditions, also referred to as bet hedging (22). HR is a specific manifestation of bet hedging as it pertains to antimicrobial resistance (11–13, 23). However, fundamental questions remain regarding HR. First, a uniform definition of HR has not been agreed upon (13). More importantly, it remains unclear whether HR is a binary characteristic or a continuously distributed phenotype and whether similar definitions should apply to prokaryotic bacteria and eukaryotic fungi (15). Second, the molecular underpinnings of HR remain unclear. Finally, the importance of HR as a mechanism of microbial persistence and treatment failure in vivo has yet to be determined (11–13). Here, we show that FLCHR is a continuously distributed phenotype in C. glabrata, a major human fungal pathogen that excels in the ability to become fully resistant following exposure to this drug (4). Quantitative measurement of HR by using the fluconazole AUC of the population analysis plot (AUCR) provided an indirect assessment of the proportion of resistant cells within the total population of each strain, as evidenced by the linear correlation between the AUCR and ABC-type efflux activity. Importantly, in vivo persistence during treatment with high-dose fluconazole was significantly associated with FLCHR, providing evidence that HR may be a cause of treatment failure and relapse observed in the clinical setting (24).
Using a binary definition of HR suggested in a recent review (13, 25), 57.6% (30/52) of the fluconazole-susceptible C. glabrata isolates included in this study met the criteria for FLCHR. However, the continuous distribution of the AUCR among FLCHR and FLCN strains (Fig. 2) and the correlation of this index with rhodamine 6G efflux indicate that FLCHR is more appropriately treated as a graded phenotype. This observation is consistent with the work of Levy et al. (15), who described a continuum of growth rates within the cell population of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, a nonpathogenic yeast closely related to C. glabrata. Those researchers hypothesized that in yeast, a combination of stochastic and deterministic factors dictate a spectrum of inheritable epigenetic states that confer different levels of fitness (15). In contrast, a bimodal distribution of persister and nonpersister cells has been described in bacterial populations (22). Our findings extend the graded nature of yeast cell states to the interstrain population level.
In the majority of FLCHR isolates, we detected a low level of ABC transmembrane transporter gene CDR1 and PDH1 upregulation (4). These expression levels were much lower than those seen in FLCR isolates (i.e., ~2-fold versus 50-fold), likely because in a heteroresistant population, only about 1 in 103 cells exhibits a resistance phenotype, thus diluting the observed increase in transporter transcripts. Moreover, none of the FLCHR C. glabrata isolates showed evidence of a gain-of-function mutation in PDR1, which has been reported to cause full resistance to fluconazole (19). Consistent with this, no significant increase in SNQ1 expression, whose transcription is also regulated by Pdr1p, was detected. In contrast to rhodamine 6G efflux, CDR1 and PDH1 expression was increased to similar levels in FLCHR strains, irrespective of their AUCRs (Fig. 7). Thus, the FLCHR phenotype seems to represent the incremental effects of multiple binary genetic switches, whose sum produces a spectrum of HR states.
The clinical significance of HR remains largely unclear for the bacteria in which it has been described (11). Here, we determined the correlation between high-level HR and persistent infection during a simulated course of high-dose fluconazole treatment by using a mouse model of hematogenously disseminated candidiasis. A significantly larger proportion of mice infected with an FLCHR isolate than of mice infected with an FLCN strain had high kidney fungal burdens after 7 days of fluconazole treatment. Interestingly, some of the FLCHR strains did not show a kidney fungal burden at day 7 and a kidney fungal burden was observed in mice infected with the FLCN strain, albeit less frequently. This finding is consistent with our in vitro results and supports the notion that some degree of HR is present in most C. glabrata isolates.
Internal diversity in population drug susceptibility may arise from genetic, epigenetic, or nongenetic mechanisms. We analyzed genetic relatedness to gain insight into the evolution and dynamics of the FLCHR phenotype. We found phenotypic clustering of some FLCHR and FLCN strains, as well as significant variability of AUCRs among some genetically related C. glabrata isolates. These relationships suggest that FLCHR represents an interplay of genetic and epigenetic mechanisms (Fig. 8).
Resistance of C. glabrata to fluconazole varies widely between isolates from different geographical regions, as well as within those regions (2, 3). We found high rates of FLCHR among C. glabrata clinical isolates collected in Israel and the United Kingdom. Together with our phylogenetic data, this geographic pattern is consistent with the circulation of multiple C. glabrata clades with different propensities to evolve full azole resistance. The degree to which regional differences in azole use drives this process requires further study.
Given the epidemiological and clinical importance of C. glabrata, we suggest that HR may be a driver of azole resistance, treatment failure, and unresolved infection. Of note, surveillance efforts have focused solely on azole resistance and do not account for the HR phenotype, which may be much more prevalent. This discrepancy may explain the inconsistent correlation observed between fluconazole MICs and clinical outcomes of treating C. glabrata infection with this drug (26). Interestingly, we did not detect HR to echinocandins in any of the clinical C. glabrata isolates, consistent with the better correlation between echinocandin MICs and the responses to treatment (8, 27).
It has been postulated that because of the fungistatic nature of azoles, Candida cells exposed to these drugs enter an arrested state in which stress-induced genetic instability promotes the development of drug resistance and breakthrough infection (28). In this context, enhanced in vivo persistence of FLCHR C. glabrata during fluconazole treatment, as observed in the mouse model, creates optimal conditions for the emergence of stress-induced mutations conferring azole resistance. The lack of significant HR to echinocandins may be related to the rapid fungicidal effect of glucan-synthase inhibition, which does not allow time for stress-induced genetic instability. It should be noted, however, that of the 52 clinical C. glabrata strains in this study, only 8 were recovered from patients treated with an azole during the preceding year (see Table S1 in the supplemental material). Hence, other types of environmental stress were probably involved in the generation of FLCHR strains. ABC transporters have broad substrate specificity, allowing them to export a wide range of cytotoxic molecules, including organic acids, sterols, and H+ ions (29). FLCHR may thus represent part of a more general stress-induced phenotype associated with the upregulated expression of ABC transporter genes.
Mechanisms of HR remain poorly understood at the molecular and single-cell levels (23). Our findings establish that FLCHR appears to be frequent in clinical C. glabrata isolates, affecting more than half of the strains tested. Quantitative PAP analysis revealed a continuous range of FLCHR rather than a categorical phenotype, suggesting that multiple determinants are involved. Additional studies should be undertaken to identify the range of genetic and/or physiological determinants that contribute to FLCHR and to elucidate the significance of the FLCHR phenotype in clinical practice.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Ethics statement.
All animal experiments were approved by the Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center (TASMC) Institutional Animal Care and Use Ethics Committee (IACUC) under protocol b3703-11-037 and conform to the Israeli Animal Experimentation Law and U.S. Public Health Service Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Clinical data extraction was approved by the TASMC Ethics Committee under protocol 0217-11-TLV in adherence to the Israeli Ministry of Health guidelines for clinical trials with human subjects.
Candida strains.
C. glabrata strains were obtained from clinical samples collected at the TASMC microbiology laboratory (48 strains) and at the University of Exeter, United Kingdom (10 strains). Each strain was specific to a single patient. Strains were identified to the species level with the Vitek 2 system and the YST ID card (bioMérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France) and by sequencing of internal transcribed spacer (ITS) regions ITS1 and ITS2 (30). All of our C. glabrata isolates (38 bloodstream and 14 mucosal isolates) were determined to be susceptible to fluconazole, voriconazole, and itraconazole by broth microdilution according to CLSI methods outlined in document M27-A3 (31). C. glabrata strains CBS15126, CBS138, and BG2 were used as fluconazole-susceptible reference strains. C. glabrata clinical isolates Cg1708, Cg191, and Cg326 served as fluconazole-resistant controls.
Drug susceptibility PAP.
Although there are no formal standards for determining HR, PAP is generally considered the most robust method (13). We analyzed the population distribution of Candida isolates for susceptibility to fluconazole, caspofungin, and anidulafungin by a plating dilution method (32). Yeast extract agar glucose (YAG; yeast extract at 5 g/liter; glucose at 10 g/liter; agar at 15 g/liter; 1 M MgCl2 at 10 ml/liter; trace elements at 1 ml/liter) was prepared with nine different concentrations of fluconazole (log2 serial dilutions ranging from 128 to 0.5 mg/liter), caspofungin (8 to 0.03 mg/liter), and anidulafungin (8 to 0.03 mg/liter). Twenty milliliters of each YAG-drug concentration or a drug-free YAG control was poured into 20-cm culture plates and allowed to cool. Candida strains were passaged once on Sabouraud’s agar to ensure purity. Two or three colonies were suspended in sterile saline, and hemocytometer counts were used to adjust the density to 106 yeast cells/ml. Four log10 dilutions of yeast cell suspension were prepared, corresponding to 105 to 102 CFU/ml. Each YAG-drug plate was divided into quadrants, and each quadrant was inoculated with six 5-µl drops of a different yeast cell suspension concentration and marked accordingly. Plates were incubated at 30°C for 24 h, and the optimal yeast concentration at which nonconfluent colonies could be enumerated was used to count CFU and to calculate the number of viable cells per milliliter. For each Candida strain, the viable cell density (in CFU per milliliter) was plotted over the drug concentration (13). To quantitate FLCHR, we calculated the area under the population distribution curve (AUC) (32). In order to increase the sensitivity of this method to detect variations in Candida growth at high fluconazole concentrations, we analyzed the AUCs for fluconazole concentrations ranging from the MIC to 128 mg/liter (Fig. 1). To enhance robustness across different experiments, the AUC was normalized by dividing it by the same value for a well-characterized FLCHR C. glabrata strain (Cg1646), yielding an AUCR.
Bacterial HR is commonly defined in binary terms as a minimal fold difference between the lowest drug concentration associated with maximal growth inhibition and the highest noninhibitory concentration (25), referred to here as the heterogeneity range (Fig. 1). To determine a meaningful fold difference breakpoint for HR, we analyzed the correlation between the AUCR and the heterogeneity of drug response on PAP.
Rhodamine 6G efflux and accumulation analyses.
To assess ABC-type drug transporter activity, we determined the glucose-induced efflux and cellular retention of rhodamine 6G as described previously (17, 33). C. glabrata isolates were grown to log phase in liquid YAG at 35°C. Yeast cells were collected by centrifugation, and 109 cells were transferred to 20 ml of fresh YAG and incubated at 27°C for an additional 2 h. For drug exposure experiments, cells were incubated in PBS with fluconazole at 8 µg/ml or in drug-free PBS at 30°C in a shaking incubator for 3 h. Next, yeast cells were collected by centrifugation and washed twice in PBS, and 10 ml of PBS containing 15 µM rhodamine 6G without glucose was added to the pellets. Suspensions were vortexed and incubated at 27°C for 90 min to allow rhodamine 6G uptake under carbon source depleted conditions. Cells were collected by centrifugation, washed twice in PBS, and suspended in 750 µl of PBS in microcentrifuge tubes. To start rhodamine 6G efflux, 250 µl of PBS with 8 mM glucose of was added. Control tubes were prepared with glucose-free PBS. Tubes were removed after 5, 15, and 25 min of incubation at 35°C, and fluorescence was measured in 200-µl aliquots of supernatant with a spectrophotometer at an excitation wavelength of 527 nm and an emission wavelength of 555 nm (Synergy HT; BioTek, Winooski, VT). ABC-specific rhodamine efflux was calculated for each strain by subtracting the fluorescence in glucose-free supernatants from that in glucose-containing supernatants. To enhance interexperimental reproducibility, the rhodamine efflux of each strain was normalized to that of C. glabrata CBS15126, which was tested in each experiment. In separate experiments, the cellular accumulation of rhodamine 6G in C. glabrata strains was determined by fluorescence microscopy. Rhodamine 6G uptake and efflux were achieved as described above. After a 15-min incubation, suspensions were centrifuged and pellets were washed twice in PBS and observed under a triple-band fluorescence microscope (Olympus BX-51; Olympus, Melville, NY) with the rhodamine filter. Images were acquired with an Olympus DP71 camera (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) and Cell^A software with the exposure kept constant at 74 ms.
ABC transporter gene expression.
We assessed the association of the PAP phenotype with the expression of efflux transporter genes known to be associated with azole resistance in C. glabrata by real-time reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) as previously described (5). Isolates were grown in liquid YAG at 35°C in a shaking incubator to mid-exponential phase. Yeast cells were enumerated in a hemocytometer and transferred into fresh YAG with fluconazole at 8 or 64 mg/liter or into drug-free YAG at a final concentration of 107/ml. Yeast suspensions were incubated for 3.5 h at 35°C with shaking; this stage did not affect C. glabrata viability, as determined by quantitative subculture on Sabouraud’s agar. Next, cells were pelleted, snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and thoroughly ground with 3-mm glass beads. Lysis buffer (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) was added, and the lysate was further homogenized in a TissueLyser (Qiagen). RNA was extracted with the RNeasy kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, including in-column DNase treatment. cDNA was generated from 50 to 100 ng of total RNA with the High Capacity RNA-to-cDNA kit (Applied Biosystems/Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY). cDNA was diluted 1:10 in RNase/DNase-free water and subjected to RT-qPCR with primers and TaqMan probes for CDR1, SNQ2, PDH1, and PDR1 (see Table S1 in the supplemental material). Each 25-µl reaction mixture included 5 µl of a cDNA template, 12.5 µl of ABI universal master mix, 0.4 µM each primer, and 0.2 µM TaqMan probe. PCRs were run in an ABI Prism 7500 sequence detection system (Applied Biosystems/Life Technologies) under the following conditions: 95°C for 10 min (AmpliTaq gold activation), followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 s (denaturation) and 60°C for 60 s (annealing and extension). The amplification efficiency was determined for each gene. For each target gene, the mean threshold cycle (CT) was calculated from triplicate experiments and normalized to ACT1 expression (ΔCT). Each gene was calibrated to the ACT1-normalized expression of its counterpart in nonheteroresistant C. glabrata strains CBS 15126 and Cg1775 (ΔΔCT), and fold expression was calculated as 2−ΔΔCT. A 2-fold increase in expression was arbitrarily set as the threshold for significant upregulation (5). The PDR1 gene sequences of six FLCHR and four FLCN C. glabrata strains were analyzed (see Text S1 in the supplemental material).
Persistent infection in a mouse model of hematogenous disseminated candidiasis.
C. glabrata is nonlethal when injected intravenously into immunocompetent mice; nonetheless, it can persist for prolonged periods in visceral tissue (34). To determine if the PAP phenotype is associated with persistent infection during fluconazole treatment in vivo, we compared the tissue burdens of Cg1775 (FLCN, fluconazole MIC of 0.25 mg/liter) and Cg1646 (FLCHR, fluconazole MIC of 1 mg/liter) in the kidneys of fluconazole-treated and untreated BALB/c mice. Cg1708 was used as a reference fluconazole-resistant strain. Eight-week-old female BALB/c mice weighing 20 to 25 g (Harlan, Rehovot, Israel) were infected by tail vein injection of 4 × 107 cells in groups of 10 per C. glabrata strain. Five mice per strain were treated with fluconazole (Pfizer, New York) at 100 mg/kg once a day intraperitoneally. The remaining five mice were injected daily with a similar volume of sterile saline. Treatment was continued for 7 days postinfection, after which mice were sacrificed by CO2 inhalation and their kidneys were harvested and processed for quantitative determination of fungal burdens. Organs were weighed and homogenized in 1 ml of sterile saline with a TissueLyser set to 1 min at 50 Hz. Homogenates were serially diluted 10-fold and inoculated onto YAG plates for 48 h at 30°C. Fungal burdens were calculated and expressed as numbers of CFU per gram of tissue. Experiments were repeated three times.
Phylogenetic analysis.
Phylogenetic relationships between different C. glabrata strains were resolved by sequencing and analysis of the rapidly evolving IGS region between nuclear genes CDH1 and ERP6 on chromosome A as described previously (35). Phylogenetic analysis included 48 fluconazole-susceptible C. glabrata isolates, 6 fluconazole-resistant clinical isolates, and reference C. glabrata strains CBS138, CBS15126, and BG2. After genomic DNA extraction, an ~660-bp fragment of the IGS was amplified with primers 00605 (5′ C TCA CAA ATG GAT TCC TTA AAG AGT TCG 3′) and 00627 (5′ GT C ACC AGA GTT GGA GTA CAT GTA G 3′). PCR was performed with 50-µl tubes containing 400 nM each primer under the following conditions: initial denaturation at 95°C (4.5 min) and then 35 cycles of 95°C (45 s), 52°C (1 min), and 72°C (1 min), followed by 72°C (7 min). The PCR products were sequenced with primers 00605 and 00627. Sequences were aligned with Clustal Omega (36), and phylogenetic trees were constructed in MrBayes 3.2 (37) by Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methodology. The average standard deviation of split frequencies (ASDSF) was calculated by comparing split and clade frequencies across 1 × 106 MCMC runs started from different randomly chosen trees. The ASDSF cutoff was set at <0.05. The final output is presented as a cladogram with the posterior probabilities for all of the splits.
Statistics.
AUCRs of FLCHR and FLCN strains were compared with the Mann-Whitney test. Comparison of transporter gene transcript and rhodamine 6G fluorescence values was done by one-sided analysis of variance with the Bonferroni post hoc test to compare specific pairs of values. Correlations among HR, transporter gene expression, and rhodamine 6G efflux were explored by using linear regression. Fungal persistence in mice infected with C. glabrata was observed as a dichotomous outcome. Therefore, we compared groups of mice infected with different C. glabrata strains by considering fungal clearance a categorical variable. A two-sided type I error of 0.05 was used as the threshold for statistical significance. Calculations were performed in Prism 6.0 (GraphPad, San Diego, CA) and Stata 11.2 (StataCorp, College Station, TX).
Data availability.
Representative C. glabrata strains (10 FLCHR and 9 FLCN) have been deposited at the CBS-KNAW Fungal Biodiversity Centre, Utrecht, Netherlands (http://www.cbs.knaw.nl; see Table S1 in the supplemental material). The GenBank accession numbers of the CDH1-ERP6 IGS sequences used for phylogenetic analyses are listed in Table S1. The GenBank accession numbers of the PDR1 gene sequences are listed in Table S2.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Jane Usher and Ken Haynes for supplying clinical C. glabrata strains and Yehuda Carmeli for useful comments on the data analysis.
This work was supported by the Ben-Dov physician researcher grant (to R.B.-A.), by the People Program (Marie Curie Actions) of the European Union Seventh Framework Program (FP7/2007-2013), by REA grant agreement 303635, and by European Research Council Advanced Award 340087, RAPLODAPT (to J.B.).
R.B.-A. designed experiments, performed experiments, analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript. O.Z. performed experiments and reviewed the manuscript. T.F. performed experiments. S.A. analyzed the data and reviewed the manuscript. A.N. performed experiments. N.W. performed experiments and analyzed the data. M.L.-W. analyzed the data. J.B. analyzed the data and reviewed the manuscript.
Footnotes
Citation Ben-Ami R, Zimmerman O, Finn T, Amit S, Novikov A, Wertheimer N, Lurie-Weinberger M, Berman J. 2016. Heteroresistance to fluconazole is a continuously distributed phenotype among Candida glabrata clinical strains associated with in vivo persistence. mBio 7(4):e00655-16. doi:10.1128/mBio.00655-16.
REFERENCES
- 1.Pfaller MA, Messer SA, Boyken L, Hollis RJ, Rice C, Tendolkar S, Diekema DJ. 2004. In vitro activities of voriconazole, posaconazole, and fluconazole against 4,169 clinical isolates of Candida spp. and Cryptococcus neoformans collected during 2001 and 2002 in the ARTEMIS global antifungal surveillance program. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 48:201–205. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2003.09.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Pfaller MA, Diekema DJ, International Fungal Surveillance Participant Group . 2004. Twelve years of fluconazole in clinical practice: global trends in species distribution and fluconazole susceptibility of bloodstream isolates of Candida. Clin Microbiol Infect 10(Suppl 1):11–23. doi: 10.1111/j.1470-9465.2004.t01-1-00844.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Pfaller MA, Diekema DJ, Gibbs DL, Newell VA, Barton R, Bijie H, Bille J, Chang SC, da Luz Martins M, Duse A, Dzierzanowska D, Ellis D, Finquelievich J, Gould I, Gur D, Hoosen A, Lee K, Mallatova N, Mallie M, Peng NG, Petrikos G, Santiago A, Trupl J, VanDen Abeele AM, Wadula J, Zaidi M. 2010. Geographic variation in the frequency of isolation and fluconazole and voriconazole susceptibilities of Candida glabrata: an assessment from the Artemis DISK Global Antifungal Surveillance Program. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 67:162–171. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2010.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bennett JE, Izumikawa K, Marr KA. 2004. Mechanism of increased fluconazole resistance in Candida glabrata during prophylaxis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 48:1773–1777. doi: 10.1128/AAC.48.5.1773-1777.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Sanguinetti M, Posteraro B, Fiori B, Ranno S, Torelli R, Fadda G. 2005. Mechanisms of azole resistance in clinical isolates of Candida glabrata collected during a hospital survey of antifungal resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 49:668–679. doi: 10.1128/AAC.49.2.668-679.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Cornely OA, Bassetti M, Calandra T, Garbino J, Kullberg BJ, Lortholary O, Meersseman W, Akova M, Arendrup MC, Arikan-Akdagli S, Bille J, Castagnola E, Cuenca-Estrella M, Donnelly JP, Groll AH, Herbrecht R, Hope WW, Jensen HE, Lass-Flörl C, Petrikkos G, Richardson MD, Roilides E, Verweij PE, Viscoli C, Ullmann AJ. 2012. ESCMID* guideline for the diagnosis and management of Candida diseases 2012: non-neutropenic adult patients. Clin Microbiol Infect 18(Suppl 7):19–37. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Pappas PG, Kauffman CA, Andes DR, Clancy CJ, Marr KA, Ostrosky-Zeichner L, Reboli AC, Schuster MG, Vazquez JA, Walsh TJ, Zaoutis TE, Sobel JD. 2016. Clinical practice guideline for the management of candidiasis: 2016 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 62:e1–e50. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ933. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Alexander BD, Johnson MD, Pfeiffer CD, Jiménez-Ortigosa C, Catania J, Booker R, Castanheira M, Messer SA, Perlin DS, Pfaller MA. 2013. Increasing echinocandin resistance in Candida glabrata: clinical failure correlates with presence of FKS mutations and elevated minimum inhibitory concentrations. Clin Infect Dis 56:1724–1732. doi: 10.1093/cid/cit136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Pfaller MA, Castanheira M, Lockhart SR, Ahlquist AM, Messer SA, Jones RN. 2012. Frequency of decreased susceptibility and resistance to echinocandins among fluconazole-resistant bloodstream isolates of Candida glabrata. J Clin Microbiol 50:1199–1203. doi: 10.1128/JCM.06112-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ostrosky-Zeichner L. 2013. Candida glabrata and FKS mutations: witnessing the emergence of the true multidrug-resistant Candida. Clin Infect Dis 56:1733–1734. doi: 10.1093/cid/cit140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Falagas ME, Makris GC, Dimopoulos G, Matthaiou DK. 2008. Heteroresistance: a concern of increasing clinical significance? Clin Microbiol Infect 14:101–104. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2007.01912.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Rinder H. 2001. Hetero-resistance: an under-recognised confounder in diagnosis and therapy? J Med Microbiol 50:1018–1020. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-50-12-1018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.El-Halfawy OM, Valvano MA. 2015. Antimicrobial heteroresistance: an emerging field in need of clarity. Clin Microbiol Rev 28:191–207. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00058-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Mondon P, Petter R, Amalfitano G, Luzzati R, Concia E, Polacheck I, Kwon-Chung KJ. 1999. Heteroresistance to fluconazole and voriconazole in Cryptococcus neoformans. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 43:1856–1861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Levy SF, Ziv N, Siegal ML. 2012. Bet hedging in yeast by heterogeneous, age-correlated expression of a stress protectant. PLoS Biol 10:e1001325. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Brun S, Bergès T, Poupard P, Vauzelle-Moreau C, Renier G, Chabasse D, Bouchara JP. 2004. Mechanisms of azole resistance in petite mutants of Candida glabrata. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 48:1788–1796. doi: 10.1128/AAC.48.5.1788-1796.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Maesaki S, Marichal P, Vanden Bossche H, Sanglard D, Kohno S. 1999. Rhodamine 6G efflux for the detection of CDR1-overexpressing azole-resistant Candida albicans strains. J Antimicrob Chemother 44:27–31. doi: 10.1093/jac/44.1.27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Caudle KE, Barker KS, Wiederhold NP, Xu L, Homayouni R, Rogers PD. 2011. Genomewide expression profile analysis of the Candida glabrata Pdr1 regulon. Eukaryot Cell 10:373–383. doi: 10.1128/EC.00073-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ferrari S, Ischer F, Calabrese D, Posteraro B, Sanguinetti M, Fadda G, Rohde B, Bauser C, Bader O, Sanglard D. 2009. Gain of function mutations in CgPDR1 of Candida glabrata not only mediate antifungal resistance but also enhance virulence. PLoS Pathog 5:e1000268. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Tsai HF, Krol AA, Sarti KE, Bennett JE. 2006. Candida glabrata PDR1, a transcriptional regulator of a pleiotropic drug resistance network, mediates azole resistance in clinical isolates and petite mutants. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 50:1384–1392. doi: 10.1128/AAC.50.4.1384-1392.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Berila N, Subik J. 2010. Molecular analysis of Candida glabrata clinical isolates. Mycopathologia 170:99–105. doi: 10.1007/s11046-010-9298-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Balaban NQ, Merrin J, Chait R, Kowalik L, Leibler S. 2004. Bacterial persistence as a phenotypic switch. Science 305:1622–1625. doi: 10.1126/science.1099390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Wang X, Kang Y, Luo C, Zhao T, Liu L, Jiang X, Fu R, An S, Chen J, Jiang N, Ren L, Wang Q, Baillie JK, Gao Z, Yu J. 2014. Heteroresistance at the single-cell level: adapting to antibiotic stress through a population-based strategy and growth-controlled interphenotypic coordination. mBio 5:e00942-00913. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00942-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Gumbo T, Chemaly RF, Isada CM, Hall GS, Gordon SM. 2002. Late complications of Candida (Torulopsis) glabrata fungemia: description of a phenomenon. Scand J Infect Dis 34:817–818. doi: 10.1080/0036554021000026936. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.El-Halfawy OM, Valvano MA. 2013. Chemical communication of antibiotic resistance by a highly resistant subpopulation of bacterial cells. PLoS One 8:e68874. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Lee I, Morales KH, Zaoutis TE, Fishman NO, Nachamkin I, Lautenbach E. 2010. Clinical and economic outcomes of decreased fluconazole susceptibility in patients with Candida glabrata bloodstream infections. Am J Infect Control 38:740–745. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2010.02.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Shields RK, Nguyen MH, Press EG, Updike CL, Clancy CJ. 2013. Caspofungin MICs correlate with treatment outcomes among patients with Candida glabrata invasive candidiasis and prior echinocandin exposure. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 57:3528–3535. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00136-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Shor E, Perlin DS. 2015. Coping with stress and the emergence of multidrug resistance in fungi. PLoS Pathog 11:e1004668. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004668. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Prasad R, Goffeau A. 2012. Yeast ATP-binding cassette transporters conferring multidrug resistance. Annu Rev Microbiol 66:39–63. doi: 10.1146/annurev-micro-092611-150111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Iwen PC, Hinrichs SH, Rupp ME. 2002. Utilization of the internal transcribed spacer regions as molecular targets to detect and identify human fungal pathogens. Med Mycol 40:87–109. doi: 10.1080/mmy.40.1.87.109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute 2008. Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts. Approved standard: M27-A3. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Satola SW, Farley MM, Anderson KF, Patel JB. 2011. Comparison of detection methods for heteroresistant vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus, with the population analysis profile method as the reference method. J Clin Microbiol 49:177–183. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01128-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kolaczkowski M, van der Rest M, Cybularz-Kolaczkowska A, Soumillion JP, Konings WN, Goffeau A. 1996. Anticancer drugs, ionophoric peptides, and steroids as substrates of the yeast multidrug transporter Pdr5p. J Biol Chem 271:31543–31548. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.49.31543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Jacobsen ID, Brunke S, Seider K, Schwarzmüller T, Firon A, d’Enfért C, Kuchler K, Hube B. 2010. Candida glabrata persistence in mice does not depend on host immunosuppression and is unaffected by fungal amino acid auxotrophy. Infect Immun 78:1066–1077. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01244-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Poláková S, Blume C, Zárate JA, Mentel M, Jørck-Ramberg D, Stenderup J, Piskur J. 2009. Formation of new chromosomes as a virulence mechanism in yeast Candida glabrata. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:2688–2693. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0809793106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Sievers F, Wilm A, Dineen D, Gibson TJ, Karplus K, Li W, Lopez R, McWilliam H, Remmert M, Söding J, Thompson JD, Higgins DG. 2011. Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega. Mol Syst Biol 7:539. doi: 10.1038/msb.2011.75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Ronquist F, Teslenko M, van der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Höhna S, Larget B, Liu L, Suchard MA, Huelsenbeck JP. 2012. MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst Biol 61:539–542. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/sys029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Representative C. glabrata strains (10 FLCHR and 9 FLCN) have been deposited at the CBS-KNAW Fungal Biodiversity Centre, Utrecht, Netherlands (http://www.cbs.knaw.nl; see Table S1 in the supplemental material). The GenBank accession numbers of the CDH1-ERP6 IGS sequences used for phylogenetic analyses are listed in Table S1. The GenBank accession numbers of the PDR1 gene sequences are listed in Table S2.