Abstract
Four strains of Corynebacterium diphtheriae were sent to UK participants in the UK National External Microbiological Quality Assessment Scheme, who were asked to examine the strains for toxin production by in vitro methods. Laboratories achieved 162/176 (92%) and 160/175 (91%) correct results with two rapid toxin producers and 145/175 (82%) with a slow toxin producer. With a non-toxigenic strain 26/175 (15%) laboratories reported toxin production. Of the 173 laboratories reporting on all four strains, only 120 (69%) achieved the correct result for all. There was no significant association between the use of various methods and results, with the exception that laboratories using a full set of positive, weak positive, and negative controls made fewer errors than those not using controls. A number of unsatisfactory practices were revealed by the trial, however, and recommendations on preparation of inoculum, media, peptones, animal sera, and use of controls are made.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- ELEK S. D. The plate virulence test for diphtheria. J Clin Pathol. 1949 Nov;2(4):250–258. doi: 10.1136/jcp.2.4.250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- JAMESON J. E. A MODIFIED ELEK TEST FOR TOXIGENIC CORYNEBACTERIUM DIPHTHERIAE. Mon Bull Minist Health Public Health Lab Serv. 1965 Mar;24:55–57. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- LaMotte L. C., Jr, Guerrant G. O., Lewis D. S., Hall C. T. Comparison of laboratory performance with blind and mail-distributed proficiency testing samples. Public Health Rep. 1977 Nov-Dec;92(6):554–560. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Maniar A. C., Fox J. G. Techniques of an "in vitro" method for determining toxigenicity of Corynebacterium diphtheriae strains. Can J Public Health. 1968 Aug;59(8):297–301. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Snell J. J., De Mello J. V., Gardner P. S. The United Kingdom national microbiological quality assessment scheme. J Clin Pathol. 1982 Jan;35(1):82–93. doi: 10.1136/jcp.35.1.82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]