Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Clinical Pathology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Pathology
. 1985 Feb;38(2):203–207. doi: 10.1136/jcp.38.2.203

Comparison of five different methods of rubella IgM antibody testing.

H Cubie, E Edmond
PMCID: PMC499103  PMID: 3968218

Abstract

Five tests for the detection of rubella specific IgM antibody were compared. They were the conventional method of sucrose density gradient fractionation, followed by haemagglutination inhibition; an anti-mu capture radioimmunoassay; and three commercially available enzyme linked assays: Rubazyme M, Rubenz M I, and its successor, Rubenz M II. The five methods detected similar numbers of rubella positive samples between seven and 35 days after the onset of symptoms; in the earlier stages, however, the radioimmunoassay and Rubenz M II were more sensitive. All three commercial kits were straightforward to use but produced misleading positive results with sera containing heterophil antibody. In considering sensitivity, specificity, and cost effectiveness together the Rubenz M tests were the most appropriate for routine use. With the recent withdrawal of Rubenz M I from the market only Rubenz M II is now available. If Epstein-Barr virus infection is excluded, Rubenz M II provides a reliable test for the diagnostic laboratory.

Full text

PDF
203

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Balfour H. H., Jr, Groth K. E., Edelman C. K., Amren D. P., Best J. M., Banatvala J. E. Rubella viraemia and antibody responses after rubella vaccination and reimmunization. Lancet. 1981 May 16;1(8229):1078–1080. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(81)92243-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Best J. M., Palmer S. J., Morgan-Capner P., Hodgson J. A comparison of Rubazyme-M and MACRIA for the detection of rubella-specific IgM. J Virol Methods. 1984 Feb;8(1-2):99–109. doi: 10.1016/0166-0934(84)90044-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Braun R., Doerr H. W., Geisen H. P., Hornig C., Huschka U., Munk K. Comparison of different methods for the detection of rubella-specific IgM antibodies. J Med Virol. 1981;8(3):207–214. doi: 10.1002/jmv.1890080308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cradock-Watson J. E., Ridehalgh M. K., Pattison J. R., Anderson M. J., Kangro H. O. Comparison of immunofluorescence and radioimmunoassay for detecting IgM antibody in infants with the congenital rubella syndrome. J Hyg (Lond) 1979 Dec;83(3):413–423. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400026243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cubie H. A. Evaluation of a new ELISA method for estimating rubella-specific IgM antibody. J Infect. 1983 Sep;7(2):144–150. doi: 10.1016/s0163-4453(83)90590-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ho-Terry L., Cohen A., Tedder R. S. Immunological characterisation of rubella virion polypeptides. J Med Microbiol. 1984 Feb;17(1):105–109. doi: 10.1099/00222615-17-1-105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hodgson J., Morgan-Capner P. Evaluation of a commercial antibody capture enzyme immunoassay for the detection of rubella specific IgM. J Clin Pathol. 1984 May;37(5):573–577. doi: 10.1136/jcp.37.5.573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Krech U., Wilhelm J. A. A solid-phase immunosorbent technique for the rapid detection of rubella IgM by haemagglutination inhibition. J Gen Virol. 1979 Aug;44(2):281–286. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-44-2-281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kurtz J. B., Malic A. Rubella-specific IgM detected by an antibody capture assay/ELISA technique. J Clin Pathol. 1981 Dec;34(12):1392–1395. doi: 10.1136/jcp.34.12.1392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Mertens T., Zippel C., Seuffer R., Eggers H. J. Comparison of four different methods for detection of rubella IgM antibodies. Med Microbiol Immunol. 1983;172(3):181–189. doi: 10.1007/BF02123804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Morgan-Capner P., Tedder R. S., Mace J. E. Rubella-specific IgM reactivity in sera from cases of infectious mononucleosis. J Hyg (Lond) 1983 Jun;90(3):407–413. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400029041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Mortimer P. P., Tedder R. S. Screening for anti-rubella IgM ad libitum. J Hyg (Lond) 1983 Feb;90(1):1–5. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400063762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Partridge J. W., Flewett T. H., Whitehead J. E. Congenital rubella affecting an infant whose mother had rubella antibodies before conception. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1981 Jan 17;282(6259):187–188. doi: 10.1136/bmj.282.6259.187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Tedder R. S., Yao J. L., Anderson M. J. The production of monoclonal antibodies to rubella haemagglutinin and their use in antibody-capture assays for rubella-specific IgM. J Hyg (Lond) 1982 Apr;88(2):335–350. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400070182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Zealley H., Edmond E. Rubella screening and immunisation of schoolgirls: results six to seven years after vaccination. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1982 Feb 6;284(6313):382–384. doi: 10.1136/bmj.284.6313.382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Pathology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES