Skip to main content
Molecular Neuropsychiatry logoLink to Molecular Neuropsychiatry
. 2016 May 20;2(2):61–78. doi: 10.1159/000445802

Genetics of Common Antipsychotic-Induced Adverse Effects

Raymond R MacNeil a, Daniel J Müller b,c,d,*
PMCID: PMC4996009  PMID: 27606321

Abstract

The effectiveness of antipsychotic drugs is limited due to accompanying adverse effects which can pose considerable health risks and lead to patient noncompliance. Pharmacogenetics (PGx) offers a means to identify genetic biomarkers that can predict individual susceptibility to antipsychotic-induced adverse effects (AAEs), thereby improving clinical outcomes. We reviewed the literature on the PGx of common AAEs from 2010 to 2015, placing emphasis on findings that have been independently replicated and which have additionally been listed to be of interest by PGx expert panels. Gene-drug associations meeting these criteria primarily pertain to metabolic dysregulation, extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS), and tardive dyskinesia (TD). Regarding metabolic dysregulation, results have reaffirmed HTR2C as a strong candidate with potential clinical utility, while MC4R and OGFR1 gene loci have emerged as new and promising biomarkers for the prediction of weight gain. As for EPS and TD, additional evidence has accumulated in support of an association with CYP2D6 metabolizer status. Furthermore, HSPG2 and DPP6 have been identified as candidate genes with the potential to predict differential susceptibility to TD. Overall, considerable progress has been made within the field of psychiatric PGx, with inroads toward the development of clinical tools that can mitigate AAEs. Going forward, studies placing a greater emphasis on multilocus effects will need to be conducted.

Key Words: Antipsychotic, Adverse effect, Extrapyramidal symptoms, Genetic association study, Metabolic syndrome, Pharmacogenetics, Polymorphism, Tardive dyskinesia, Weight gain

Introduction

Antipsychotic (AP) drugs are the mainstay pharmacological treatment for schizophrenia (SCZ) and related psychotic disorders. APs have also been shown to be effective for the treatment of other psychiatric conditions, including bipolar disorder, treatment-resistant depression, and autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) [1,2,3]. Despite their demonstrable clinical utility, significant interindividual variation in the therapeutic efficacy and tolerability of APs presents a significant challenge for physicians and their patients.

The introduction of second-generation ‘atypical’ APs (SGAs; e.g., risperidone) was highly welcomed by the psychiatric community, as these drugs were thought to represent a significant improvement over first-generation ‘typical’ APs (FGAs; e.g., haloperidol). The use of FGAs had been marred by the tendency of these drugs to cause extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS), and with long-term use, tardive dyskinesia (TD), a highly debilitating and potentially irreversible movement disorder [4,5]. While the risk of developing EPS and TD associated with SGAs is substantially lower, these adverse effects (AEs) still represent an ongoing concern [6,7]. Moreover, the use of SGAs is often accompanied by weight gain and related cardiometabolic abnormalities, thereby putting patients at a greater risk of developing diabetes and cardiovascular disease [8,9,10]. Importantly, whether caused by FGAs or SGAs, AP-induced AEs (AAEs) are a major source of patient noncompliance and treatment discontinuation, both of which lead to greater functional impairment, higher rates of relapse, and an increased risk of suicide [11,12,13,14]. In view of this, dissecting the underlying factors contributing to interindividual variation in susceptibility to AAEs may facilitate better treatment selection, and thereby improve clinical outcomes.

Pharmacogenetics (PGx) is a field of study and clinical tool that assesses how genetic variability influences drug response and tolerability. Evidence from twin studies implicates a significant genetic component underlying individual differences in susceptibility to AAEs [15,16]. Therefore, PGx has the potential to significantly improve the treatment of SCZ and other neuropsychiatric disorders. Considering the progress of PGx in the last two decades, it seems inevitable that pharmacogenetic testing - accounting for genetic variability in both pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes - will eventually play a role in the prescription of APs and other psychotropic drugs. It is hoped that physicians will be able to utilize information from pharmacogenetic tests in order to deliver personalized drug therapies with optimal efficacy and minimal AEs. Although still in the early stages of their predictive capacity, several psychiatric-based PGx tests have already begun to be offered by private companies [for a review, see 17]. Furthermore, several clinical PGx expert panels, such as the Pharmacogenomics Knowledgebase (PharmGKB) and the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) [18,19,20], as well as drug regulatory agencies (e.g., US Food and Drug Administration) [21,22], have begun to propose guidelines to assist physicians in interpreting the clinical significance of information provided by these tests. Finally, recent studies assessing the feasibility and utility of incorporating PGx into standard psychiatric practice have yielded encouraging results [23,24,25,26,27].

Here, we survey the literature published on the PGx of AAEs within the last 5 years (2010-2015), placing emphasis on drug-gene associations replicated in independent samples and which have additionally been listed by expert panels as having potential clinical relevance. Several high-quality reviews providing extensive coverage on the AP PGx literature published prior to 2010 are available [28,29,30,31].

Methods

PubMed, Embase (Ovid), and PsycINFO (Ovid) databases were searched using the following combination of key-terms and/or their matched subject headings: (‘antipsychotic’ OR ‘neuroleptic’) AND (‘pharmacogenetics’ OR ‘pharmacogenomics’ OR ‘genetic association study’ OR ‘polymorphism’) AND (‘adverse effect’ OR ‘tardive dyskinesia’ OR ‘extrapyramidal symptoms’ OR ‘weight gain’). Our search parameters limited results to include only peer-reviewed articles that were published in English from 2010 to 2015 inclusive. Letters to the editor, editorials, and publications solely related to drug efficacy, or which were otherwise irrelevant to the subject of our review were excluded. The reference lists of retained publications were also screened for other relevant studies. Given the abundance of literature available, emphasis has been placed on independently replicated gene-drug relationships of common AAEs that have additionally been recognized by expert panels as having potential clinical relevance.

Results

Studies meeting our criteria represent two major categories of AAEs: (1) metabolic dysregulation, including weight gain and/or metabolic syndrome (MetS), and (2) movement disorders, including EPS and TD. In total, we have reviewed 53 studies that report on variants within 11 different genes.

Weight Gain and MetS

AP-induced weight gain (AIWG) has an incidence of approximately 30% and is most pronounced among patients treated with the SGAs clozapine and olanzapine [32]. The heritability (h2) of AIWG is estimated to be 0.6-0.8 [16]. AIWG often coincides with the development of MetS, a complex phenotype characterized by central obesity, insulin resistance, hyperglycemia, dyslipidemia, and hypertension [8]. With respect to AIWG and AP-induced MetS (AP-MetS), we report on variants within genes HTR2C, LEP, LEPR, MC4R, MTHFR, and OGFRL1. Information on gene-drug interactions listed to be of potential clinical significance by expert PGx panels is given in table 1. A detailed overview of the studies, including information on design, treatment duration, AP use, sample demographics, main results, and associated odds ratios and/or p values (if applicable), is provided in table 2.

Table 1.

Putative genetic associations with common metabolic AAEs studied from 2010 to 2015 and their related listings by expert PGx panels

Gene Polymorphism Putative association Listings by expert panels References
HTR2C rs3813929 (759C/T) T allele confers protection against AIWG CPIC: evidence level Da PharmGKB: evidence level 2Bb [42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55]

rs1414334 (C/G) C allele is associated with a higher risk of antipsychotic-induced MetS CPIC: evidence level Da PharmGKB: evidence level 2Bb [49, 61, 62, 63]

LEP rs7799039 (2548G/A) G allele acts dominantly to heighten susceptibility to AIWG PharmGKB: evidence level 3c [44, 46, 50, 52, 62, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78]

LEPR rs1137101 (Q223R) or (668A/G) AIWG and related metabolic dysregulation; risk allele is unclear PharmGKB: variant annotation [52, 73, 74, 77, 78, 81]

MC4R rs17782313 (C/T) C allele linked to higher risk of AIWG PharmGKB: evidence level 2Bb [97, 98]

rs489693 (A/C) A allele linked to higher risk of AIWG PharmGKB: evidence level 2Bb [75, 93, 96]

MTHFR rs1801131 (A1298C) C allele associated with a greater risk of metabolic AAEs PharmGKB: evidence level 3c [109, 111, 112]

rs1801133 (C677T) T allele associated with a greater risk of metabolic AAEs PharmGKB: evidence level 3c [81, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112]

OGFRL1 rs9346455 (T/G) T allele linked to higher risk of AIWG PharmGKB: variant annotationd [115]

References include both positive and negative findings. See references [19, 20] for further information on the PharmGKB and CPIC, as well as the criteria used to assign evidence levels.

a

Considered of interest.

b

Moderate evidence for this association.

c

Low evidence for this association.

d

Listed under IBA57.

Table 2.

Overview of studies and their main findings related antipsychotic-induced weight gain and/or metabolic syndrome

Gene Polymorphism(s) Design, treatment duration Medication (n) Sample [diagnosis; n (m/f); ethnicity/race] Main findings
HTR2C rs3813929 (759C/T) prospective 4 weeks olanzapine (124) psychotic or mood disorder; n = 124 (62/62); German-Caucasian (124) olanzapine treatment associated with change in BMI (p = 0.009) and weight (p = 0.008) [42]

HTR2C rs3813929 (759C/T) retrospective 8 weeks risperidone (36) ASD pediatric sample (5–16 years); n = 32 (28/4); all Caucasian carriers of the T allele had lower BMI gain (p < 0.001) [43]

HTR2C rs3813929 (759C/T) retrospective 12 months risperidone (45) ASD pediatric sample; n = 45 (34/11), n = 31 at 12 months; Caucasian (44), African (1) nonsignificant [47]

HTR2C rs3813929 (759C/T) cohort ≥6 months risperidone (124) ASD pediatric sample (7–17 years); n = 124 (112/12); mostly European American nonsignificant [48]

HTR2C rs3813929 (759C/T)
rs3813928
rs498207
rs6318 (Ser23Cys)
retrospective 12 weeks amisulpride (2)
clozapine (24)
olanzapine (33)
quetiapine (2)
risperidone (8)
mixed (52)
SCZ or SA; n = 128 (80/48); European (118), Turkish (10) significant association for rs498207 (p < 0.0049); G-A-T haplotype (of SNPs rs498207, rs3813928, and rs3813929, respectively) overrepresented in group with <7% BWG [44]

HTR2C rs3813929 (759C/T) cross-sectional ≥12 months clozapine (113) SCZ; n = 113 (81/32); Korean (113) nonsignificant trend for male weight-gainers vs. male nongainers (p = 0.051) [50]

HTR2C rs3813929 (759C/T) retrospective ≥7 months iloperidone (216) SCZ; n = 216 (180/36); White (85), Black (106), Asian (17), other (8) nonsignificant [51]

HTR2C rs3813929 (759C/T) cohort naturalistic 95% ≥3 months aripiprazole (23)
clozapine (68)
olanzapine (54)
quetiapine (31)
risperidone (30)
psychotic disorder (89), mood disorder (21), personality disorder (8), other (23); n = 141 (82/59); European-Caucasian nonsignificant [52]

HTR2C rs3813929 (759C/T) clinical trial 8 weeks olanzapine (205) bipolar disorder, borderline personality disorder, treatment resistant depression; n = 205; White, Hispanic, Black nonsignificant [53]

HTR2C rs3813929 (759C/T) retrospective 3 months olanzapine or risperidone SCZ (77), SA (7), or delusional disorder (17); n = 101; drug-naïve females, Caucasian (101) nonsignificant [54]

HTR2C rs3813929 (759C/T)
rs518147 (G697C)
rs6318 (Ser23Cys)
retrospective 6 weeks mostly olanzapine or clozapine chronic SCZ or SA; n = 205 (141/64); European (126), African-American (58), unspecified (21) C-G-Cys haplotype (for SNPs rs3813929, rs518147, and rs6318, respectively) over-represented in patients with weight gain (p = 0.0015; OR: 1.93, 95% CI = 1.04–3.56) [45]

HTR2C rs3813929 (759C/T)
rs1414334 (C/G)
meta-analysis olanzapine (336) chronic SCZ; n = 336 (140/196); European (149), Croatian (108), Korean (79) nonsignificant association for –759C/T allele; significant association showing that C allele confers risk of AP-MetS (OR: 2.44, 95% CI = 1.48–4.00; p = 0.0004; I2 = 0) [49]

HTR2C rs3813929 (759C/T) meta-analysis various SCZ or SA; n = 862; European American, African-American, Asian T allele confers significant protection against AIWG (p = 0.02); association more pronounced after limiting analysis to all or almost all European samples (p = 0.006) [45]

HTR2C rs1414334 (C/G) cross-sectional ≥3 months olanzapine (43)
risperidone (40)
clozapine (31)
aripiprazole (11)
quetiapine (15)
FGAs (17)
polypharmacy (29)
SCZ (146), SA (23), or psychotic disorder (17); n = 186 (127/59); 93% of participants were of European ancestry while the remaining 7% were of Asian, African, or mixed ancestry C allele carriership is significantly associated with a greater risk of AP-MetS (OR: 3.73, 95% CI = 1.29–10.79; p = 0.015) [61]

HTR2C rs1414334 (C/G) cross-sectional unstated clozapine (190) SCZ (clinical diagnosis of F2 group according to ICD-10); n = 190; all European nonsignificant [62]

HTR2C rs6318 (rs1414334 proxy)
rs498177, rs521018, rs5988072, rs2192371, rs12833104
cross-sectional ≥3 months clozapine (171)
olanzapine (91)
risperidone (194)
SCZ; n = 456 (299/157); Han Chinese the rs521018-rs498177 haplotype was significantly associated with AP-MetS, but only in female patients (p = 0.0108) [63]

HTR2C-LEP rs3813929 (759C/T)
rs7799039 (2548G/A)
cross-sectional ≥3 months clozapine (67)
olanzapine (67)
risperidone (55)
quetiapine (3)
polypharmacy (8)
SCZ (139), SA (43), or psychotic disorder (18); n = 200 (134/66); European-Caucasian combined HTR2C –759C/T-LEP-2548G/A genotype significantly associated with AIWG (OR: 2.88; 95% CI = 1.05–7.95) [46]

LEP rs7799039 (2548G/A) retrospective 12 weeks clozapine (24)
olanzapine (33)
other (12)
mixed (52)
SCZ or SA; n = 128 (80/48); European (118), Turkish (10) nonsignificant [44]

LEP rs7799039 (2548G/A) cross-sectional ≥12 months clozapine (113) polypharmacy for 39.8% patients SCZ; n = 113 (81/32); Korean (113) BMI gain for AA genotype carriers was significantly greater than carriers of both the AG and GG genotypes (p = 0.048; reported for AA-AG comparison) [50]

LEP rs7799039 (2548G/A) cohort, naturalistic 95% ≥3 months aripiprazole (23)
clozapine (68)
olanzapine (54)
quetiapine (31)
risperidone (30)
psychotic disorder (89), mood disorder (21), personality disorder (8), other (23); n = 141 (82/59); European-Caucasian nonsignificant [52]

LEP rs7799039 (2548G/A) cross-sectional unstated clozapine (190) SCZ (clinical diagnosis of F2 group according to ICD-10); n = 190; Finnish (190) nonsignificant [62]

LEP rs7799039 (2548G/A) cross-sectional unstated clozapine (132)
olanzapine (41)
risperidone (120)
quetiapine (52)
sulpride (48)
haloperidol (47)
SCZ; n = 633 (338/295); 570 included in pharmacogenetic analysis; patients of Taiwanese descent LEP rs7799039 G allele significantly associated with BMI (p = 0.008), waist circumference (p = 0.014), MetS (p = 0.019), insulin (p = 0.034), and HOMA (p = 0.029) under a dominance genotypic model [73]

LEP rs7799039 (2548G/A) retrospective ≥3 months clozapine (56) SCZ, SA, or psychotic disorder; n = 56 (44/12); Spanish nonsignificant [76]

LEP rs7799039 (2548G/A)
rs10954173
rs3828942
prospective ≥6 weeks clozapine (80)
olanzapine (28)
risperidone (32)
haloperidol (16)
other (24)
SCZ; n =181; European (127), African-American (43), other (9) significant association between haplotype LEP rs7799039G-rs10954173G-rs3828942G with AIWG (p = 0.035); the rs7799039 G allele (p = 0.042) and G allele of rs3828942 (p = 0.032) were associated with greater weight gain [74]

LEP rs7799039 (2548G/A)
rs10244329, rs12706832 rs2071045
cohort 8 weeks risperidone (181) ASD pediatric sample; n = 181 (148/33); White (125), Black (26), Hispanic (10), other (16) significant association: the rs7799039 G allele acts dominantly to increase risk for AIWG (p = 1.4 × 10–4), while AA homozygotes are relatively protected [75]

LEP rs7799039 (2548G/A) prospective, longitudinal 12 months haloperidol
olanzapine
risperidone
ziprasidone
aripiprazole
quetiapine
drug naïve, first-episode psychosis with DSM-IV criteria meeting SCZ or a SCZ spectrum disorder; n = 205 (118/87); 94% European-Caucasian (Spanish) nonsignificant [77]

LEPR rs1137101 (Q223R or 668A/G) cross-sectional ≥3 months clozapine (71)
olanzapine (68)
risperidone (57)
other SGA (4)
SCZ (139), SA (43), or other psychotic disorder (18); n = 200 (134/66); European-Caucasian significant association for female subjects: 70.6% were obese in the LEPR 223QQ group vs. 38.5% in the 223QR (OR: 0.11, 95% CI = 0.02–0.54; p = 0.007) and 40.0% in the 223RR (OR: 0.07, 95% CI = 0.01–0.63; p = 0.018) groups [78]

LEPR rs1137101 (Q223R or 668A/G) cohort, naturalistic 95% ≥3 months aripiprazole (23)
clozapine (68)
olanzapine (54)
quetiapine (31)
risperidone (30)
psychotic disorder (89), mood disorder (21), personality disorder (8), other (23); n = 141 (82/59); European-Caucasian LEPR 223R allele was significantly associated with an increased risk of obesity in females (p = 0.03), but not in males [52]

LEPR rs1137101 (Q223R or 668A/G) cross-sectional unstated clozapine (132)
olanzapine (41)
risperidone (120)
other (147)
SCZ; n = 633 (338/295); 570 included in pharmacogenetic analysis; patients of Taiwanese descent nonsignificant [73]

LEPR rs1137101 (Q223R or 668A/G) retrospective ≥6 weeks clozapine (80)
olanzapine (28)
risperidone (32)
haloperidol (16)
other (24)
SCZ; n =181, European (127) African-American (43), other (9) nonsignificant [74]

LEPR rs1137101 (Q223R or 668A/G) prospective, longitudinal 12 months haloperidol
olanzapine
risperidone
quetiapine
drug naïve, first-episode psychosis with DSM-IV criteria meeting SCZ or a SCZ spectrum disorder; n = 205 (118/87); 94% European-Caucasian (Spanish) nonsignificant [77]

LEPR rs1137101 (Q223R or 668A/G) cross-sectional ≥12 months olanzapine (62)
risperidone (59)
paliperidone (24)
other APs (61)
n = 206 (137/69); Malaysian (109), Chinese (76), Indian (21) LEPR 223R or 668G allele significantly associated with increased risk of MetS (OR: 0.47, 95% CI = 0.28–0.80, p = 0.005) [81]

MC4R rs17782313 (C/T)
rs2229616
rs11872992
rs8087522
cohort 4–14 weeks clozapine (99)
olanzapine (36)
risperidone (40)
haloperidol (16)
other (33)
chronic SCZ or SA; n = 224 (150/74); European American (157), African-American (56), other (11) nonsignificant trend with respect to rs17782313 (p = 0.09); nominally significant association for rs8087522 detected in the clozapine-treated European subsample, with the A allele being overrepresented within the weight gain group [97]

MC4R rs17782313 (C/T) retrospective 4 weeks olanzapine (135)
quetiapine (102)
risperidone (66)
amisulpride (58)
clozapine (36)
paliperidone (28)
SCZ; whole study, n = 345, 61% with an F2 (ICD-10) diagnosis; adjusted subsample (controlling for co-medication), n = 173, 80% with F2 diagnosis; first-episode sample, n = 59; control sample, n = 40 C allele was significantly associated with risk of weight gain in a dose-loading manner (p = 0.045); effect was more pronounced in the adjusted subsample excluding co-medication (p = 0.03); dose-response effect was absent in first-episode subsample, but association was still significant (p = 0.041) [98]

MC4R rs8087522
rs489693 (A/C)
rs11872992
rs8093815
cohort 8 weeks risperidone (181) ASD pediatric sample; n = 181 (148/33); White (125), Black (26), Hispanic (10), other (16) nonsignificant trends for associations of rs8087522 and rs8093815 with AIWG (p = 0.06 and p = 0.07, respectively); nominally significant results for associations of rs11872992 and rs489693 with AIWG (p = 0.03 for both; pcor >0.05) [75]

MC4R Tag-SNPs GWAS, cohort 6–12 weeks cohort 1: quetiapine (36)
risperidone (135)
aripiprazole (41)
olanzapine (45)
cohort 2: clozapine (73)
cohort 3: various
cohort 1: drug-naïve youths (4–19 years), n = 270; European American (131), African-American (70), other (69)
cohort 2: treatment-resistant SCZ, n = 73; all European American cohort 3: SCZ, n = 40
rs489693 A allele showed significant effects in all three cohorts:
cohort 1: p = 2.8 × 10−7
cohort 2: p = 1.4 × 10−4
cohort 3: p = 0.007
meta-analytic p = 5.59 × 10−12 [93]

MC4R rs489693 retrospective 4 weeks olanzapine (133)
quetiapine (102)
risperidone (66)
clozapine (34)
other (83)
whole study, n = 341, ~61% with an F2 (ICD-10) diagnosis; adjusted subsample, n = 169, ~80% with F2 diagnosis; first-episode sample, n = 59; control sample, n = 40 MC4R rs489693 A allele was significantly associated with increased risk of AIWG in whole study sample and both of the subsamples [96]

MTHFR rs1801133 (C677T) cross-sectional median treatment duration of 6 months quetiapine (49)
risperidone (46)
other (10)
SGA-treated sample, n = 105; primarily of European descent (74%) T allele carriership was significantly associated with a greater prevalence of MetS (p = 0.05) [108]

MTHFR rs1801131 (A1298C)
rs1801133 (C677T)
cohort 8.87 ± 3.6 weeks clozapine or olanzapine (179)
risperidone (92)
other (77)
n = 347 (183/164); 66 were first-episode patients; European/Caucasian (281), African-Americans (56), other (11) nonsignificant association for MTHFR A1298C variant in total study sample, clozapine/olanzapine-treated European subsample, and first-episode subsample analyses; nominal association detected for the C677T variant in total study sample analysis (p = 0.03; pcor > 0.05) [109]

MTHFR rs1801131 (A1298C)
rs1801133 (C677T)
cohort Chinese sample: 8–10 weeks Spanish sample: 3 months Chinese sample: chlorpromazine risperidone, other Spanish sample: risperidone olanzapine, other first-episode, drug-naïve SCZ patients; Chinese Han sample, n = 182 (83/99); Spanish sample, n = 72 (53/19) 677CC genotype carriers showed a significantly greater gain in BMI compared to T allele carriers for both the Chinese (p = 0.012) and Spanish (p = 0.017) samples; findings for the rs1801131 SNP were nonsignificant [110]

MTHFR rs1801131 (A1298C)
rs1801133 (C677T)
cross-sectional variable primarily SGAs SCZ (69.3%), SD (11.4%), or SA (19.3%); n = 518 (66.4% male); primarily of European ancestry significant association detected for MTHFR A1298C, with C/C genotype carriers having a 2.4 times higher risk of MetS compared to A/A genotypes (OR: 2.44, 95% CI = 1.25–4.76; p = 0.009) [111]

MTHFR rs1801131 (A1298C)
rs1801133 (C677T)
cohort 3 months clozapine (16)
olanzapine (41)
risperidone (37)
other (30)
SCZ or SA; n = 104 (71/33); European-Caucasian MTHFR 1298C allele was significantly associated with changes to several metabolic parameters after SGA initiation, especially weight gain (p = 0.006) and changes in blood glucose (p = 0.024) [112]

MTHFR rs1801133 (C677T) cross-sectional ≥12 months olanzapine (62)
risperidone (59)
paliperidone (24)
other APs (61)
SCZ; n = 206 (137/69); Malaysian (109), Chinese (76), Indian (21) nominally significant: MTHFR 677 T allele appeared to confer protection against AP-MetS (OR: 0.59, 95% CI = 0.35–0.99, p = 0.049); authors declare that correction for multiple testing was not performed to avoid type 2 error [81]

MTHFR rs1801133 (C677T) cross-sectional ≥6 months various SCZ spectrum disorder; n = 127; ethnicity unspecified significant association: for patients using risk medication, T allele carriership (CT/TT) was associated with an increased risk of AP-MetS (p < 0.001); MTHFR and COMT 158 Val interaction was significant (p = 0.0073) [107]

OGFRL1 Tag-SNPs GWAS, cohort discovery sample: 20.5 (±6.2) replication sample: 6.1 (±2.1) discovery:
olanzapine (63)
quetiapine (67)
risperidone (59)
replication: clozapine (69)
olanzapine (18)
discovery sample, SCZ, n = 189 (151/38); a subset of patients from the CATIE sample of sole European ancestry; replication sample, SCZ, n = 86 (56/30); all of European ancestry GWAS yielded a number of signals in association with BMI gain, the strongest of which emerged from the rs9346455 SNP upstream of the OGFRL1 gene (p = 6.49 × 10–6); replication: p = 0.005; meta-analytic p = 1.09 × 10−7 [115]

SA = Schizoaffective disorder; SD = schizophreniform disorder.

HTR2C

Serotonin 2C receptors (5-HT2CRs) are integral to the regulation of energy homeostasis via their interaction with the melanocortin and leptin signaling pathways [33,34,35]. The most potent weight-inducing APs are characterized by their high affinity for 5-HT2CRs and the antagonistic properties they have at these receptors [36]. 5- HT2CR antagonism promotes hyperphagic activity and attenuates energy expenditure [35]. In light of this, the X-linked HTR2C gene encoding 5-HT2CRs has been among the most extensively investigated genes with respect to AP-induced metabolic dysregulation. Results from studies conducted prior to 2010 have pointed to a consistent relationship between the rs3813929 (−759C/T) promoter SNP and AIWG [28,37]. This SNP has been shown to affect the transcription of HTR2C, though the exact impact on gene expression remains unclear [38,39,40,41].

Several studies included in our results have replicated the association of −759C/T with AIWG [42,43,44,45,46], though negative and contradictory results were also reported [47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54]. One study involving a heterogeneous psychiatric sample reported that carriers of the HTR2C −759T allele were protected against the weight-inducing effects of olanzapine [42]. This association was also confirmed in a pediatric ASD sample treated with risperidone [43]. However, 2 other studies also involving samples of pediatric patients with ASDs could not verify this result [47,48]. Opgen-Rhein et al. [44] had initially identified a nominally significant association between the −759C/T SNP and AIWG. However, a haplotype analysis revealed that the A-G-C haplotype (of SNPs rs498207, rs3813928, and rs3813929, respectively) was significantly overrepresented in the weight gain group (i.e. ≥7% increase in body weight), while the opposite haplotype (G-A-T) was overrepresented in the control group.

A study by Sicard et al. [45] provides additional support for the involvement of −759C/T in differential susceptibility to AIWG. Haplotype analyses including correlated SNPs rs518147 (G-697C) and rs6318 (Ser23Cys) showed that the C-G-Cys23 haplotype was significantly overrepresented within the weight gain group. Furthermore, a meta-analysis published as part of the same study confirmed the association between the HTR2C −759T allele and resistance to AIWG. The effect size was more pronounced when limiting the analysis to studies including all or almost all European subjects and excluding Asian samples. Limiting the analysis to samples with all or almost all European subjects also eliminated significant heterogeneity and publication bias that was initially detected.

A more recent meta-analysis only detected a trending association between −759C/T and AIWG, though only 4 studies were included as the authors were specifically interested in olanzapine-induced weight gain [49]. Kang et al. [50] also reported a trend in their study involving a sample of Korean SCZ patients. Five other studies reported neither an association nor a trend [51,52,53,54,55]. As Wallace et al. [41] first pointed out, contradictory reports relating to this association can mainly be attributed to differences in study duration, as the relationship between AIWG and −759C/T is most prominent during the early stages of treatment (<3 months). Indeed, this pattern is largely consistent with the studies reviewed here. Conflicting results may also be attributable to as yet unidentified confounding variables, such as differential RNA editing [56,57] and the ‘flip-flop’ phenomenon described by Lin et al. [58]. All things considered, the overall evidence suggests that the HTR2C −759C/T polymorphism is an important mediator of AIWG during the initial stages of treatment. However, further investigation is needed to determine the precise nature of this association, and also to understand how −759C/T may interact with other variables to influence AIWG.

Recent evidence has also reaffirmed an association of the HTR2C intragenic rs1414334 (C>G) SNP with a heightened risk of AP-MetS. Carriers of the C allele are more likely to meet criteria for AP-MetS. In agreement with their previous findings [59,60], a Dutch research group reported an association (when controlling for type 2 error) between the rs1414334 C allele and a higher risk of developing AP-MetS [61]. A recent meta-analysis by Ma et al. [49] was able to corroborate the significance of this association when examining all 3 studies conducted by the Dutch research group. However, negative results of this association have also been reported [62,63]. Nevertheless, there is an overall greater amount of evidence supporting this association than there is refuting it. Future studies should investigate the clinical utility of this variant as a means to inform and optimize treatment selection.

LEP and LEPR

Leptin plays a critical role in the regulation of energy homeostasis and feeding behavior. In the hypothalamus, particularly the arcuate and ventromedial nuclei, leptin targets leptin receptors encoded by the LEPR gene, whereby it transmits a potent anorectic signal [64,65,66]. Mutations in both LEP and LEPR are linked to metabolic abnormalities and the occurrence of human obesity [67,68,69]. The LEP −2548G allele, for instance, has been associated with an increased risk of overweight and obesity [69,70,71]. Taken together, there is a sound theoretical basis supporting the potential involvement of LEP and LEPR in AP-induced metabolic dysregulation. Indeed, several studies from our review have implicated these genes in metabolic AAEs [46,52,72,73,74,75]. Still, negative and contradictory results have also been reported [44,62,76,77].

In line with a 2008 report by Yevtushenko et al. [72], Gregoor et al. [46] found that the combined presence of the LEP −2548G allele and absence of the HTR2C −759T allele was associated with a greater risk of SGA-related obesity. Another study by Gregoor et al. [52] found that baseline obesity risk was significantly greater for females carrying the LEPR 223R allele. This result runs contrary to the finding from their 2009 study which instead reported that the 223R allele was associated with lower baseline risk for female obesity [78].

Nurmi et al. [75] have offered compelling evidence in support of the association of the −2548G allele with AIWG. The sample of this study was comprised of risperidone-treated autistic youth who had participated in one of two clinical trials conducted by the NIMH Research Units on Pediatric Psychopharmacology (RUPP). The majority of subjects were drug-naïve and of European ancestry. Genotype analysis revealed a robust result for the LEP −2548G allele, which acted dominantly to confer risk of AIWG. Highly significant findings were also identified for the CNR1 promoter SNP rs806378 and the CNR1 variant rs1049353. Under a risk-allele dose model, the combination of risk variants associated with LEP and CNR1 attained an impressive effect size (D = 0.85; p = 1.3 × 10-9) [75]. Furthermore, the CNR1 rs806378 finding is in agreement with a previous report from our group [79].

Perez-Iglesias et al. [77] found no association for either the −2548G/A or Q223R SNP with AIWG. Negative findings for associations of −2548G/A or Q223R with AIWG were also reported by 3 other studies [44,62,76]. In terms of other metabolic abnormalities, Gregoor et al. [80] found that the absence of the LEP −2548G and LEPR 223R alleles were independently associated with higher TC/HDL ratios in males and females, respectively. Roffeei et al. [81] reported that the LEPR 223R allele was protective against AP-MetS [81]. In summary, the results for the LEP −2548G/A variant have been somewhat consistent, whereas those for the LEPR Q223R SNP are less straightforward.

MC4R

The gene product of MC4R, the melanocortin 4 receptor (MC4-R), is essential for maintaining energy homeostasis and regulating food consumption [82]. MC4-R has also been implicated in molecular pathways regulating sexual arousal, inflammatory response, pain modulation, and blood pressure [83,84,85,86]. MC4-R is widely distributed throughout the brain, though it primarily regulates metabolic pathways from within hypothalamic and brain stem nuclei [82,87]. MCR-4 interacts with both the serotonergic and leptinergic systems [88,89], and similar to LEP and LEPR, mutations in the MC4R gene or adjacent regions have a well-established role in the expression of congenital and polygenic forms of obesity [90,91,92]. Recent pharmacogenetic studies have identified the MC4-R gene locus SNPs rs489693 and rs17782313 as potential biomarkers of AIWG.

The rs489693 SNP was first detected in a genome-wide association study (GWAS) conducted by Malhotra et al. [93] in a cohort of SGA-treated, drug-naïve youth. Twenty SNPs surpassed a statistical threshold of p < 10-5, all of them located at a single locus, approximately 190 kb downstream of MC4R. This locus overlaps with a region that had been previously linked to obesity and BMI by other GWA studies [94,95]. The association of SNP rs489693 with AIWG was subsequently confirmed in three replication cohorts. Importantly, these cohorts consisted of adult SCZ patients, and one of these cohorts had previous SGA exposure, thereby demonstrating that this association is neither exclusive to pediatric nor drug naïve populations [93]. Furthermore, this association was recently replicated by Czerwensky et al. [96] in a naturalistic study involving a sample of SCZ inpatients. A trending association between rs489693 and BMI gain was also reported by Nurmi et al. [75] in the RUPP study mentioned above.

In a study involving a sample of SCZ patients of primarily European or African ancestry (70 and 25%, respectively), Chowdhury et al. [97] were unable to identify an association between MC4R rs17782313 and AIWG at the genotype level. However, an allelic analysis restricted to patients of European ancestry receiving either clozapine or olanzapine revealed a trending association in which the C allele conferred a greater risk of AIWG. Czerwensky et al. [98] were able to corroborate this finding at the genotype level and showed that CC and CT genotype carriers were at a significantly greater risk of AIWG. A haplotype analysis of rs17782313 and rs489693, as well as other SNPs in LD, may yield more robust results. In sum, the MC4R locus appears to be a very promising candidate for the prediction of AIWG. Clinical trials will be required to assess the clinical utility of these SNP as biomarkers to predict AIWG.

MTHFR

MTHFR (methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase) encodes an enzyme that catalyzes biochemical reactions important to the folate pathway [99]. Two common MTHFR variants, rs1801133 (C677T) and rs1801131 (A1298C), reduce the catalytic activity of MTHFR by 35 and 20%, respectively [100,101,102]. The attenuation of MTHFR as a consequence of these SNPs has been linked to elevated plasma homocysteine. Hyperhomocysteinemia has been associated with a greater risk of both SCZ and cardiovascular disease [103,104,105]. Taken together, there is a rationale establishing MTHFR as a potential candidate influencing AAEs.

Following up on the results of a previous study [106], Ellingrod et al. [107] found that an interaction between the MTHFR 677T and COMT 158Val alleles was positively associated with risk of AP-MetS. Interestingly, increasing age was negatively correlated with the likelihood of meeting MetS criteria, suggesting that this interaction exerts a stronger effect on relatively younger patients. Consistent with the studies by Ellingrod et al. [106,107], Devlin et al. [108] found that pediatric patients with ASDs carrying the 677T allele were at a greater risk of MetS compared to CC homozygotes. Similarly, Kao et al. [109] reported a nominally significant association between the T allele and AIWG. Conflicting results in which the T allele has a protective effect against AP-MetS have also been reported [81,110]. In addition, other studies have failed to identify an association between MetS and the 677T allele, but have reported positive results for an association with the 1298C allele [111,112].

In light of the discordant findings, it is unlikely that MTHFR plays a major role in the PGx of metabolic AAEs. However, considering the heterogeneity across studies and possible gene interaction effects, it would be premature to completely rule out MTHFR as a potentially informative biomarker. There may also be other confounding variables not taken into consideration. For example, dietary folate has been shown to be important in moderating the effects of the MTHFR SNPs C677T and A1298C in other contexts (e.g., susceptibility to cancer) and may similarly influence AAEs [113].

OGFRL1

OGFRL1 encodes for opioid growth factor receptor-like 1, a paralog receptor which binds the endogenous opioid met-enkephalin [114]. Our research team recently conducted a GWAS to assess the genetic factors contributing to AIWG within a subset of European participants (n = 189) derived from the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) sample [11,115]. This subsample represented a relatively homogenous group of participants with similar clinical characteristics and treatment. A strong signal was detected at marker rs9346455, approximately 6.6 kb upstream of OGFRL1, with greater BMI gain observed among carriers of the G allele. This finding was subsequently replicated in an independent sample to produce a meta-analytic p value of 1.09 × 10−7. Although not quite reaching genome-wide significance, this finding still represents a robust and promising result. At present, the rs9346455 SNP is not known to have any functional significance, and only a few studies on OGFLR1 have been published [115]. Because it is unknown if or how opioid growth factor receptor-like 1 is related to energy homeostasis, this result should be interpreted with caution. Future research should aim to address these uncertainties and clarify the potential role of OGFRL1 in AIWG.

To summarize this section, several genetic associations have been consistently replicated for AIWG, and the HTR2C intragenic SNP rs1414334 has been verified as a possible predictor of MetS vulnerability. In light of this accumulating evidence, efforts have been undertaken to develop the first gene panels for use in clinical populations [e.g., 116].

EPS and TD

Our review of EPS and TD will focus on the genes encoding cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6), dopamine receptor D2 (DRD2), heparan sulfate proteoglycan 2 (HPSG2), dipeptidyl aminopeptidase-like protein 6 (DPP6), and vesicular monoamine transporter 2 (SLC18A2) genes. See table 3 for an overview of the results and listings by expert PGx panels. Detailed information on the studies is listed in table 4.

Table 3.

Putative genetic associations with antipsychotic-induced TD and EPS studied from 2010 to 2015, and their related listings by expert PGx panels

Gene Polymorphism Putative association Listings by expert panels References
CYP2D6 CYP2D6*1, *2, *3, *4, *5, *6, *10, *41 PM and IM status associated with a greater risk of TD or EPS PharmGKB: evidence level 3a [124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131]

DPP6 rs6977820 (T > C) T allele associated with a greater risk of TD PharmGKB: evidence level 2B [149]

DRD2 rs1800497 (Taq1A) G allele associated with a greater risk of TD PharmGKB: evidence level 2Bb CPIC: evidence level Dc [136, 137, 138, 139]

SLC18A2 rs2015586 (G/C) C allele associated with a greater risk of TD unlisted [129, 140]

HSPG2 rs2445142 (G > C); rs878949 (T > C)d G and T allele associated with a greater risk of TD PharmGKB: evidence level 3a [145, 146, 147]

References include both positive and negative findings. See references [19, 20] for further information on the PharmGKB and CPIC, as well as the criteria used to assign evidence levels.

a

Low evidence for this association.

b

Moderate evidence for this association.

c

Considered of interest.

d

Perfect proxy marker for rs2445142 (r2 = 1).

Table 4.

Overview of studies pertaining to antipsychotic-induced movement disorders

Gene Polymorphism(s) Design, treatment duration Medication (n) Sample [diagnosis; n (m/f); ethnicity] Main findings
CYP2D6 EM/UM, IM, PM meta-analysis primarily FGAs SCZ spectrum disorder; association of TD with CYP2D6, n = 1,482 (all studies); n = 336 (prospective); Caucasian, Japanese, Korean, Chinese analysis of prospective studies showed significant associations between TD and CYP2D6 when comparing wt/wt genotypes with wt/mut and mut/mut + mut/wt (p = 0.008 and p = 0.02, respectively) [124]

CYP2D6 CYP2D6*1, *41, *3, *4, *5, *1xn, *2xn cross-sectional ≥12 months FGAs; equivalent ≥100 mg chlorpromazine daily SCZ; n = 66; European-Caucasian significant association between a greater ability to metabolize CYP2D6, as measured by increasing number of functional alleles, and tardive dyskinesia (χ2 = 7.65, d.f. = 1, p = 0.006) [125]

CYP2D6 CYP2D6*1, *3, *4, *10, *41, *1xn, *2xn clinical trial 8 days risperidone (50) SCZ (43), SA (7); n = 50 (39/11); Caucasian indirect association suggesting that PMs and IMs experienced a higher occurrence of EPS in response to risperidone [128]

CYP2D6 CYP2D6*1, *4, *5, *6, *1xn RCT 24 h (2× 2 studies) haloperidol (25)
risperidone (25)
healthy volunteers, n = 25 (17/8); PMs, n = 8; EMs, n = 10; UMs, n = 7; Caucasian metabolizer status associated with differences in ‘EPS’ (measured as wakefulness activity by actigraphy) [126, 127]

CYP2D6 unclear cross-sectional unclear SCZ (CATIE subsample); n = 710 (524/186) nonsignificant [129]
CYP2D6 *1, *3, *4, *5, *6, *2xN retrospective 8 weeks risperidone (83) first-episode SCZ, drug-naïve; n = 83 (17/66) nonsignificant [130]
CYP2D6 *1,*2,*4,*5,*6B, *10B, *17, *29, *35, *41, *43, *106 naturalistic cohort risperidone (25) multiple diagnoses (unstated); n = 24 (16/8); South-African Black (9), White (15) nonsignificant [131]
DPP6 rs6977820 discovery: GWAS replication: cohort various SCZ, discovery, TD, n = 61 (35/26); non-TD, n = 61 (35/26); replication, TD, n = 36 (18/18); non-TD, n = 136 (88/50); all Japanese discovery: p = 7.0 × 10–6 (< reach genome-wide significance); significant association in replication sample: p = 0.008 (after correction for multiple testing); combined: p = 4.6 × 10–6 [149]

DRD2 rs6277, rs1800497 (Taq1A); rs1800498 (Taq1D); rs1799732 (–141CIns/Del) cross-sectional ≥1 month FGAs (37)
SGAs (303)
both (15)
missing (47)
SCZ (277), SA (55), other PDs (70); n = 401; relatively young (median age = 26 years) Caucasian sample association of Taq1A with TD nonsignificant, though this variant was significantly associated with akathisia (p = 0.001); the −141C variant was significantly associated with TD (p = 0.001) [139]

DRD2 rs6275, rs1800497 (Taq1A) rs1800498 rs1801028 cross-sectional at least 3 months unclear SCZ; n = 263 (140/123); Korean nonsignificant [139]

HSPG2 rs2445142 (G/A) discovery: GWAS replication: cohort various SCZ, discovery, n = 50 TD, n = 50 non-TD; replication, n = 36 TD (18/18), n = 136 non-TD (88/50); all Japanese nominally significant association with TD attained in genome-wide and replication samples (p = 0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively); combined p = 2.0 × 10−5 [145]

HSPG2 rs2445142 (G/A) rs878949 (surrogate; r2= 1) CATIE: prospective Jewish: cross-sectional ≥3 months various Jewish-Israeli sample, n = 166 (89/77); CATIE subsample, n = 179 (147/32); European-Caucasian nominal significant association identified between rs2445142 (or rs878949 as a surrogate) in both samples (p = 0.003 and p = 0.039, respectively), with the G allele being the risk allele [146]

HSPG2 rs2445142, rs2270697 prospective unclear most SCZ, PD, or other; n = 168; Caucasian nonsignificant, including rs2445142 [147]

SLC18A2 rs2015586 cross-sectional unclear SCZ (CATIE subsample); n = 710 (524/186); 56% European-American p = 9.858 × 10−5; result is nonsignificant at genome-wide significance of 5.0 × 10−8 [129]

SLC18A2 and DRD2 SLC18A2: rs2015586, rs363224 DRD2: rs6277 retrospective variable durations various SCZ or SCZ spectrum disorder; n = 223; Caucasian (193), African-American (30) gene-gene interaction involving C allele of rs363224 and the C allele of rs6277 was significantly associated with AIMS scores (p = 0.001); nominal association involving rs2015586 [140]

AIMS = Abnormal Involuntary Movements Scale; mut = mutant; PD = psychotic disorder; RCT = randomized controlled trial; SA = schizoaffective disorder; UM = ultrarapid metabolizer; wt = wild type.

CYP2D6

CYP2D6 is a highly polymorphic enzyme involved in the metabolism of over 25% of the pharmaceuticals in clinical use, including the majority of APs [24]. CYP2D6 is predominantly expressed within the liver [117], though constitutive expression has also been detected in various brain regions, suggesting that CYP2D6 may also influence the activity of drugs at their sites of action [118].

Given the highly polymorphic nature of the CYP2D6 locus, genotypes are typically described using *star allele nomenclature, which indicates an estimate of an individual's corresponding phenotype or metabolizer status [119]. Four different metabolizer phenotypes are commonly identified: (1) poor metabolizer (PM); (2) intermediate metabolizer (IM); (3) extensive metabolizer (EM; the ‘wild-type’), and (4) ultrarapid metabolizer. The frequencies of these phenotypes and corresponding genotypes vary considerably between ethnic groups. For additional details on the specific allelic combinations associated with each metabolizer status and the distribution of CYP2D6 alleles among different ethnic groups, refer to Hicks et al. [21] and references [17,120], respectively. Numerous studies published prior to 2010 have examined the relationship between CYP2D6 and EPS/TD, with the majority having supported a significant association between CYP2D6 metabolizer status and susceptibility to EPS/TD [121,122,123]. Eight studies published since 2010 have been reviewed here [124,125,126,127,128,129,130,131].

Fleeman et al. [124] conducted a meta-analysis of 20 studies reporting data on EPS and/or TD in relation to the CYP2D6 genotype. The majority of studies included clinical samples of patients treated with FGAs. After limiting the analysis to prospective studies only, PMs and IMs were found to have a significantly greater susceptibility to developing TD and AP-induced parkinsonism than EMs. Additionally, PMs had TD symptoms of greater severity than EMs.

A large-scale candidate gene study utilizing data from the CATIE sample, however, found no association between TD and CYP2D6[129]. Interestingly, results from a recent cross-sectional study by Koola et al. [125] suggested that the risk of TD was positively correlated with the number of functional CYP2D6 alleles that an individual carries. The experimenters speculated that active metabolites of FGAs might have toxic pharmacodynamic properties, and that a greater capacity to metabolize FGAs could therefore enhance susceptibility to TD by increasing exposure to these toxic metabolites. Three other studies involving healthy volunteers reported an indirect association between the PM or IM CYP2D6 phenotypes and a greater risk of developing EPS [126,127,128]. Finally, 2 studies involving risperidone-treated samples found no association between CYP2D6 metabolizer status and EPS [130,131].

Owing to difficulties in characterizing CYP2D6 genotypes, most studies investigating associations with this gene have limited sample sizes and are therefore underpowered. Also, naturalistic and cross-sectional pharmacogenetic studies of CYP2D6 are limited given that numerous factors influencing the activity of this enzyme (e.g., co-medications, diet) remain unaccounted for. The meta-analysis performed by Fleeman et al. [124], which yielded significant results only after excluding cross-sectional and retrospective studies, underscores this point. Accordingly, a greater number of prospective studies, with sample sizes providing adequate power, are needed to clarify the role of CYP2D6 in AP-induced EPS/TD.

Dopamine Receptor D2

The binding of dopamine D2 receptors (DRD2) is hallmark feature of all APs and is strongly linked to their efficacy in treating the positive symptoms associated with SCZ and related spectrum disorders [132]. Because dopaminergic transmission in the nigrostriatal pathway is essential for adaptive motor control [133], aberrant DA signaling in this pathway is thought to underlie - at least in part - the pathophysiology of TD and EPS [134,135]. In light of this, various studies have investigated the possibility that variation at the DRD2 locus could explain individual differences in susceptibility to AP-induced EPS and TD. The DRD2/ANKK1 marker rs1800497 (TaqIA) has yielded the most consistent findings, with two meta-analyses conducted prior to 2010 supporting an association with TD [136,137]. However, the two studies included in our review that reexamined this association yielded negative results [138,139]. Nevertheless, these studies hold little weight in view of the overall evidence, and the association between the TaqIA variant and TD susceptibility continues to be of clinical interest. Future studies should aim to investigate the clinical utility of this variant in guiding treatment selection.

SLC18A2

The SLC18A2 gene encodes vesicular monoamine transporter 2 (VMAT2), which is involved in regulating the release of numerous neurotransmitters, including dopamine. A recent study by our lab revealed a significant association between the SLC18A2 rs363224 CC genotype and susceptibility to TD in sample of chronic SCZ patients [140]. An association of TD with an interaction between the SLC18A2 rs363224 C allele and the putatively functional DRD2 rs6277 C allele showed an even greater effect size. Several nominally significant results for SLC18A2 were also reported, the most interesting of which was rs2015586. This SNP was the top signal detected by Tsai et al. [129] in their candidate gene study of TD in the CATIE subsample.

HSPG2

HSPG2 encodes heparan sulfate proteoglycan 2, or perlecan, a highly conserved and essential structural protein originally identified within the basal lamina (i.e. basement membrane) [141]. Perlecan has also been shown to have an important role in endocytosis, as well as in the mediation of cell signaling, migration and proliferation [142,143].

Using a genome-wide approach, a team of Japanese researchers [144] identified a number of putative associations predisposing to treatment-resistant TD, with the strongest signal emerging from an intronic SNP (rs2445142) located in the HSPG2 gene. Although none of the associations survived correction for multiple testing, a replication study reanalyzing the top 67 hits in an independent sample was performed [145]. Case and control criteria were stringently defined so as to represent an extreme distribution of the TD phenotype, thereby increasing the power of the sample. A nominally significant association between the HSPG2 SNP rs2445142 and TD was once again detected. As with the discovery sample, the G allele was found to be overrepresented in the treatment-resistant group. Pooling the results from genome-wide and replication samples, the rs2445142-TD association attained an allelic p value of 2.0 × 10-5. Functional studies of the rs2445142 variant provided further evidence that HSPG2 is involved in TD [145]. Moreover, this association was later replicated by Greenbaum et al. [146] in two independent samples, one of Jewish-Israeli ancestry and the other of American-European ancestry. After limiting the control group of the Jewish-Israeli sample to subjects representing an ‘extreme’ TD-resistant phenotype, a nominally significant association between the risk rs2445142 G allele and TD was detected. A nominal association was also identified in the European-American sample using a surrogate marker (rs878949, r2 = 1) as a proxy for the rs2445142 genotype. A recent prospective study by Bakker et al. [147], however, was unable to verify this association. Still, given the naturalistic design of this study, it is possible that the signal was masked. While the results for HSPG2 are promising, further replication of this finding is warranted.

DPP6

DPP6 encodes dipeptidyl peptidase protein 6, an auxiliary subunit of kv4.2 voltage-gated potassium channels [148]. Using the same discovery sample and a similar methodological approach to that of the Japanese study on HSPG2 (though this time utilizing a different SNP array), the same research team detected an association between the DPP6 intronic SNP rs6977820 and TD [149]. The A allele was found to be overrepresented in treatment-resistant TD cases. However, the association did not reach a genome-wide level of significance (defined at p < 1.9 × 107). Nevertheless, replication in an independent sample yielded a significant result (allelic p = 0.008), giving a combined sample p value of 4.6 × 106. Subsequent functional studies conducted by the investigators provided further evidence that the DPP6 SNP rs6977820 influences susceptibility to TD [149]. In sum, DPP6 appears to be a promising biomarker for identifying patients at risk of developing treatment-resistant TD.

Discussion

In this review, we surveyed the literature on the PGx of AAEs from 2010 to 2015 inclusive, placing emphasis on independently replicated gene-drug associations that have been supported by expert panels. The studies included in the review assessed genetic associations involving metabolic dysregulation and movement disorders.

With respect to metabolic dysregulation, the studies included in this review have reaffirmed associations of the HTR2C −759C/T and LEP −2548G/A SNPs with AIWG [e.g., 45,74]. Furthermore, additional evidence has accumulated in support of an association between the HTR2C rs1414334 SNP and AP-MetS [49]. With respect to AIWG, the MC4R marker rs489693 arguably represents the most promising finding to have emerged within the last 5 years [75,93,96,97]. Also, a recent GWAS has identified a promising biomarker of AIWG risk at the OGFRL1 locus [115].

In terms of TD and EPS, a large meta-analysis has provided additional support for an association between abnormal CYP2D6 metabolizer status and greater susceptibility to AP-induced movement disorders, namely AIP and TD [124]. Research has also implicated variants of the SLC18A2 gene and an interaction between SLC18A2 and DRD2 in TD susceptibility [129,140]. Finally, HSPG2 and DPP6 have emerged as promising candidates for the prediction of TD susceptibility [145,146,149].

The studies on HSPG2 and DPP6 are noteworthy for reasons other than the results they obtained. The studies that looked at these genes involved a stringent characterization of the phenotypes constituting cases and controls. Enhancements in power attained through extreme phenotype sampling can help to facilitate the identification of risk alleles that are relatively rare or that only exert a modest effect on drug-gene phenotypes [150]. More frequent application of this design strategy could benefit psychiatric PGx by identifying variants that might usually go undetected due to noise within the sample. However, the limitations inherent to this sampling method, such as the requirement for more extensive screening protocols and the potential that detected variant effects may not apply to a broader distribution of the phenotype [151], need to be considered.

Also of interest in this review was the number of studies representing cases in which the consideration of multilocus effects yielded significant findings, while the examination of single markers was shown to yield nominal or nonsignificant results, or significant results with otherwise smaller effect sizes [46,72,75,107,140]. These studies highlight the genetic complexity of the phenotypes under examination and the need for investigators to place greater emphasis on gene-gene interactions in unravelling the pharmacogenetic determinants of AAEs. Statistical tools and methods for performing analyses of this complexity are becoming increasingly more efficient [152,153,154]. For example, principles of pathway-analysis are being combined with machine learning techniques in order to detect epistatic effects from high-dimensional GWAS datasets [155]. The application of computerized algorithms including genetic and nongenetic variables to predict AAEs appears to be particularly promising [e.g., 156].

Conclusion

In summary, pharmacogenetic studies of AAEs bear the promise of improving treatment outcomes by allowing physicians to deliver personalized treatments with minimal AEs and optimal efficacy. One important aspect is that gene variants frequently have larger effect sizes in pharmacogenetic phenotypes compared with complex disease risk [157]. Consistent with this, gene variants associated with AIWG appear to have relatively large effect sizes, especially the rs489693 marker at the MC4R gene locus [93]. Furthermore, there is general consensus for an association between CYP2D6 abnormal metabolizer status and an increased risk of AAEs, including TD and parkinsonism [124]. The levels of evidence assigned to AAE genetic associations by expert clinical PGx panels and consortia have continued to increase. In addition, drug regulatory agencies, such as the FDA and Health Canada, are beginning to include PGx information on AP drug labels. Nevertheless, the current level of evidence remains limited, and further validation by additional studies is required. Also, further research is needed to identify novel and interacting variants for AAEs. Building up on these efforts will undoubtedly lead to the implementation of genetic testing to predict and thereby reduce the occurrence of AAEs.

Disclosure Statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  • 1.Muralidharan K, Ali M, Silveira LE, Bond DJ, Fountoulakis KN, Lam RW, et al. Efficacy of second generation antipsychotics in treating acute mixed episodes in bipolar disorder: a meta-analysis of placebo-controlled trials. J Affect Disord. 2013;150:408–414. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2013.04.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Zhou XP, Keitner GIP, Qin BM, Ravindran AVP, Bauer MP, Del Giovane CP, et al. Atypical antipsychotic augmentation for treatment-resistant depression: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyv060. DOI: 10.1093/ijnp/pyv060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.McCracken JT, McGough J, Shah B, Cronin P, Hong D, Aman MG, et al. Risperidone in children with autism and serious behavioral problems. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:314–321. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa013171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Zádori D, Veres G, Szalárdy L, Klivényi P, Vécsei L. Drug-induced movement disorders. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2015;14:877–890. doi: 10.1517/14740338.2015.1032244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Jeste DV, Caligiuri MP. Tardive dyskinesia. Schizophr Bull. 1993;19:303–315. doi: 10.1093/schbul/19.2.303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hartling L, Abou-Setta AM, Dursun S, Mousavi SS, Pasichnyk D, Newton AS. Antipsychotics in adults with schizophrenia: comparative effectiveness of first-generation versus second-generation medications: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2012;157:498–511. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-7-201210020-00525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Leucht S, Cipriani A, Spineli L, Mavridis D, Orey D, Richter F, et al. Comparative efficacy and tolerability of 15 antipsychotic drugs in schizophrenia: a multiple-treatments meta-analysis. Lancet. 2013;382:951–962. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60733-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.De Hert M, Detraux J, van Winkel R, Yu W, Correll CU. Metabolic and cardiovascular adverse effects associated with antipsychotic drugs. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2012;8:114–126. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2011.156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Strom BL, Eng SM, Faich G, Reynolds RF, D'Agostino RB, Ruskin J, et al. Comparative mortality associated with ziprasidone and olanzapine in real-world use among 18,154 patients with schizophrenia: the Ziprasidone Observational Study of Cardiac Outcomes (ZODIAC) Am J Psychiatry. 2011;168:193–201. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.08040484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Nagaya T, Yoshida H, Takahashi H, Kawai M. Heart rate-corrected QT interval in resting ECG predicts the risk for development of type-2 diabetes mellitus. Eur J Epidemiol. 2010;25:195–202. doi: 10.1007/s10654-009-9423-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lieberman JA, Stroup TS, McEvoy JP, Swartz MS, Rosenheck RA, Perkins DO, et al. Effectiveness of antipsychotic drugs in patients with chronic schizophrenia. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:1209–1223. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa051688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ascher-Svanum H, Faries DE, Zhu B, Ernst FR, Swartz MS, Swanson JW. Medication adherence and long-term functional outcomes in the treatment of schizophrenia in usual care. J Clin Psychiatry. 2006;67:453–460. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v67n0317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Tafesse E, Hines PL, Carson WH. Atypical antipsychotic adherence and hospitalization in patients with schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2003;60:346–346. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Novick D, Haro JM, Suarez D, Perez V, Dittmann RW, Haddad PM. Predictors and clinical consequences of non-adherence with antipsychotic medication in the outpatient treatment of schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res. 2010;176:109–113. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2009.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Müller DJ, Schulze TG, Knapp M, Held T, Krauss H, Weber T, et al. Familial occurrence of tardive dyskinesia. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2001;104:375–379. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0447.2001.00401.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Gebhardt S, Theisen FM, Haberhausen M, Heinzel-Gutenbrunner M, Wehmeier PM, Krieg JC, et al. Body weight gain induced by atypical antipsychotics: an extension of the monozygotic twin and sib pair study. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2010;35:207–211. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2710.2009.01084.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Changasi AH, Shams TA, Pouget JG, Müller DJ. Genetics of antipsychotic drug outcome and implications for the clinician: into the limelight. Transl Dev Psychiatry. 2014;2:24663. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Caudle KE, Klein TE, Hoffman JM, Müller DJ, Whirl-Carrillo M, Gong L, et al. Incorporation of pharmacogenomics into routine clinical practice: the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) guideline development process. Curr Drug Metab. 2014;15:209–217. doi: 10.2174/1389200215666140130124910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Whirl-Carrillo M, McDonagh EM, Hebert JM, Gong L, Sangkuhl K, Thorn CF, et al. Pharmacogenomics knowledge for personalized medicine. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2012;92:414–417. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2012.96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Relling MV, Klein TE. CPIC: Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium of the Pharmacogenomics Research Network. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2011;89:464–467. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2010.279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hicks JK, Bishop JR, Sangkuhl K, Muller DJ, Ji Y, Leckband SG, et al. Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) guideline for CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 genotypes and dosing of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2015;98:127–134. doi: 10.1002/cpt.147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Swen JJ, Nijenhuis M, de Boer A, Grandia L, Maitland-van der Zee AH, Mulder H, et al. Pharmacogenetics: from bench to byte - an update of guidelines. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2011;89:662–673. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2011.34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Fagerness J, Fonseca E, Hess G, Scott R, Gardner K, Koffler M, et al. Pharmacogenetic-guided psychiatric intervention associated with increased adherence and cost savings. Am J Manag Care. 2014:e146–e156. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Müller DJ, Kekin I, Kao AC, Brandl EJ. Towards the implementation of CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 genotypes in clinical practice: update and report from a pharmacogenetic service clinic. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2013;25:554–571. doi: 10.3109/09540261.2013.838944. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Walden LM, Brandl EJ, Changasi A, Sturgess JE, Soibel A, Notario JF, et al. Physicians' opinions following pharmacogenetic testing for psychotropic medication. Psychiatry Res. 2015;229:913–918. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2015.07.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Benitez J, Jablonski MR, Allen JD, Winner JG. The clinical validity and utility of combinatorial pharmacogenomics: enhancing patient outcomes. Appl Transl Genomics. 2015;5:47–49. doi: 10.1016/j.atg.2015.03.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Altar CA, Carhart J, Josiah AD, Hall-Flavin D, Winner JG, Dechairo B. Clinical utility of combinatorial pharmacogenomics-guided antidepressant therapy: evidence from three clinical studies. Mol Neuropsychiatry. 2015;1:145–155. doi: 10.1159/000430915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Lett TA, Wallace TJ, Chowdhury NI, Tiwari AK, Kennedy JL, Müller DJ. Pharmacogenetics of antipsychotic-induced weight gain: review and clinical implications. Mol Psychiatry. 2012;17:242–266. doi: 10.1038/mp.2011.109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ravyn D, Ravyn V, Lowney R, Nasrallah HA. CYP450 pharmacogenetic treatment strategies for antipsychotics: a review of the evidence. Schizophr Res. 2013;149:1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2013.06.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Arranz MJ, Rivera M, Munro JC. Pharmacogenetics of response to antipsychotics in patients with schizophrenia. CNS Drugs. 2011;25:933–969. doi: 10.2165/11595380-000000000-00000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Lencz T, Malhotra AK. Pharmacogenetics of antipsychotic-induced side effects. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2009;11:405–415. doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2009.11.4/tlencz. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Müller DJ, Kennedy JL. Genetics of antipsychotic treatment emergent weight gain in schizophrenia. Pharmacogenomics. 2006;7:863–887. doi: 10.2217/14622416.7.6.863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Xu Y, Jones JE, Kohno D, Williams KW, Lee CE, Choi MJ, et al. 5-HT2CRs expressed by pro-opiomelanocortin neurons regulate energy homeostasis. Neuron. 2008;60:582–589. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.09.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Zhou L, Sutton GM, Rochford JJ, Semple RK, Lam DD, Oksanen Laura J, et al. Serotonin 2C receptor agonists improve type 2 diabetes via melanocortin-4 receptor signaling pathways. Cell Metab. 2007;6:398–405. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2007.10.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Donovan MH, Tecott LH. Serotonin and the regulation of mammalian energy balance. Front Neurosci. 2013;7:36. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2013.00036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Meltzer HY. The role of serotonin in antipsychotic drug action. Neuropsychopharmacology. 1999;21:106S–115S. doi: 10.1016/S0893-133X(99)00046-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.De Luca V, Müller DJ, de Bartolomeis A, Kennedy JL. Association of the HTR2C gene and antipsychotic induced weight gain: a meta-analysis. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2007;10:697–704. doi: 10.1017/S1461145707007547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Buckland PR, Hoogendoorn B, Guy CA, Smith SK, Coleman SL, O'Donovan MC. Low gene expression conferred by association of an allele of the 5-HT2C receptor gene with antipsychotic-induced weight gain. Am J Psychiatry. 2005;162:613–615. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.3.613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Hill MJ, Reynolds GP. 5-HT2C receptor gene polymorphisms associated with antipsychotic drug action alter promoter activity. Brain Res. 2007;1149:14–17. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.02.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Hill MJ, Reynolds GP. Functional consequences of two HTR2C polymorphisms associated with antipsychotic-induced weight gain. Pharmacogenomics. 2011;12:727–734. doi: 10.2217/pgs.11.16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Wallace TJ, Zai CC, Brandl EJ, Müller DJ. Role of 5-HT(2C) receptor gene variants in antipsychotic-induced weight gain. Pharmacogenomics Pers Med. 2011;4:83–93. doi: 10.2147/PGPM.S11866. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Laika B, Leucht S, Heres S, Schneider H, Steimer W. Pharmacogenetics and olanzapine treatment: CYP1A2*1F and serotonergic polymorphisms influence therapeutic outcome. Pharmacogenomics J. 2010;10:20–29. doi: 10.1038/tpj.2009.32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Hoekstra PJ, Troost PW, Lahuis BE, Mulder H, Mulder EJ, Franke B, et al. Risperidone-induced weight gain in referred children with autism spectrum disorders is associated with a common polymorphism in the 5-hydroxytryptamine 2C receptor gene. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2010;20:473–477. doi: 10.1089/cap.2009.0071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Opgen-Rhein C, Brandl EJ, Müller DJ, Neuhaus AH, Tiwari AK, Sander T, et al. Association of HTR2C, but not LEP or INSIG2, genes with antipsychotic-induced weight gain in a German sample. Pharmacogenomics. 2010;11:773–780. doi: 10.2217/pgs.10.50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Sicard MN, Zai CC, Tiwari AK, Souza RP, Meltzer HY, Lieberman JA, et al. Polymorphisms of the HTR2C gene and antipsychotic-induced weight gain: an update and meta-analysis. Pharmacogenomics. 2010;11:1561–1571. doi: 10.2217/pgs.10.123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Gregoor JG, Mulder H, Cohen D, van Megen HJGM, Egberts TCG, Heerdink ER, et al. Combined HTR2C-LEP genotype as a determinant of obesity in patients using antipsychotic medication. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2010;30:702–705. doi: 10.1097/jcp.0b013e3181fa05a2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Correia CT, Almeida JP, Santos PE, Sequeira AF, Marques CE, Miguel TS, et al. Pharmacogenetics of risperidone therapy in autism: association analysis of eight candidate genes with drug efficacy and adverse drug reactions. Pharmacogenomics J. 2010;10:418–430. doi: 10.1038/tpj.2009.63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Del Castillo N, Zimmerman MB, Tyler B, Ellingrod VL, Calarge C. 759C/T variants of the serotonin (5-HT2C) receptor gene and weight gain in children and adolescents in long-term risperidone treatment. Clin Pharmacol Biopharm. 2013;2:110. doi: 10.4172/2167-065x.1000110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Ma X, Maimaitirexiati T, Zhang R, Gui X, Zhang W, Xu G, et al. HTR2C polymorphisms, olanzapine-induced weight gain and antipsychotic-induced metabolic syndrome in schizophrenia patients: a meta-analysis. Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract. 2014;18:229–242. doi: 10.3109/13651501.2014.957705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Kang SH, Lee JI, Han HR, Soh M, Hong JP. Polymorphisms of the leptin and HTR2C genes and clozapine-induced weight change and baseline BMI in patients with chronic schizophrenia. Psychiatr Genet. 2014;24:249–256. doi: 10.1097/YPG.0000000000000053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Thompson A, Lavedan C, Volpi S. Absence of weight gain association with the HTR2C -759C/T polymorphism in patients with schizophrenia treated with iloperidone. Psychiatry Res. 2010;175:271–273. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2009.03.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Gregoor JG, van der Weide J, Loovers HM, van Megen HJ, Egberts TC, Heerdink ER. Polymorphisms of the LEP, LEPR and HTR2C gene: obesity and BMI change in patients using antipsychotic medication in a naturalistic setting. Pharmacogenomics. 2011;12:919–923. doi: 10.2217/pgs.11.40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Houston JP, Kohler J, Bishop JR, Ellingrod VL, Ostbye KM, Zhao F, et al. Pharmacogenomic associations with weight gain in olanzapine treatment of patients without schizophrenia. J Clin Psychiatry. 2012;73:1077–1086. doi: 10.4088/JCP.11m06916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Kuzman MR, Medved V, Bozina N, Grubisin J, Jovanovic N, Sertic J. Association study of MDR1 and 5-HT2C genetic polymorphisms and antipsychotic-induced metabolic disturbances in female patients with schizophrenia. Pharmacogenomics J. 2011;11:35–44. doi: 10.1038/tpj.2010.7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Almoguera B, Riveiro-Alvarez R, Lopez-Castroman J, Dorado P, Vaquero-Lorenzo C, Fernandez-Piqueras J, et al. Association of common genetic variants with risperidone adverse events in a Spanish schizophrenic population. Pharmacogenomics J. 2013;13:197–204. doi: 10.1038/tpj.2011.57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Burns CM, Chu H, Rueter SM, Hutchinson LK, Canton H, Sanders-Bush E, et al. Regulation of serotonin-2C receptor G-protein coupling by RNA editing. Nature. 1997;387:303–308. doi: 10.1038/387303a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Drago A, Serretti A. Focus on HTR2C: a possible suggestion for genetic studies of complex disorders. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2009;150B:601–637. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.b.30864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Lin PI, Vance JM, Pericak-Vance MA, Martin ER. No gene is an island: the flip-flop phenomenon. Am J Hum Genet. 2007;80:531–538. doi: 10.1086/512133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Mulder H, Cohen D, Scheffer H, Gispen-de Wied C, Arends J, Wilmink FW, et al. HTR2C gene polymorphisms and the metabolic syndrome in patients with schizophrenia: a replication study. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2009;29:16–20. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0b013e3181934462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Mulder H, Franke B, van der-Beek van der AA, Arends J, Wilmink FW, Scheffer H, et al. The association between HTR2C gene polymorphisms and the metabolic syndrome in patients with schizophrenia. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2007;27:338–343. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0b013e3180a76dc0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Risselada AJ, Vehof J, Bruggeman R, Wilffert B, Cohen D, Al Hadithy AF, Arends J, Mulder H. Association between HTR2C gene polymorphisms and the metabolic syndrome in patients using antipsychotics: a replication study. Pharmacogenomics J. 2010;1:62–67. doi: 10.1038/tpj.2010.66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Klemettila JP, Kampman O, Seppala N, Viikki M, Hamalainen M, Moilanen E, et al. Association study of the HTR2C, leptin and adiponectin genes and serum marker analyses in clozapine treated long-term patients with schizophrenia. Eur Psychiatry. 2015;30:296–302. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2014.08.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Bai YM, Chen TT, Liou YJ, Hong CJ, Tsai SJ. Association between HTR2C polymorphisms and metabolic syndrome in patients with schizophrenia treated with atypical antipsychotics. Schizophr Res. 2011;125:179–186. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2010.11.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Halaas JL, Gajiwala KS, Maffei M, Cohen SL, Chait BT, Rabinowitz D, et al. Weight-reducing effects of the plasma protein encoded by the obese gene. Science. 1995;269:543–546. doi: 10.1126/science.7624777. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Myers MG, Jr, Olson DP. Central nervous system control of metabolism. Nature. 2012;491:357–363. doi: 10.1038/nature11705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Bingham NC, Anderson KK, Reuter AL, Stallings NR, Parker KL. Selective loss of leptin receptors in the ventromedial hypothalamic nucleus results in increased adiposity and a metabolic syndrome. Endocrinology. 2008;149:2138–2148. doi: 10.1210/en.2007-1200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Clement K, Vaisse C, Lahlou N, Cabrol S, Pelloux V, Cassuto D, et al. A mutation in the human leptin receptor gene causes obesity and pituitary dysfunction. Nature. 1998;392:398–401. doi: 10.1038/32911. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Wabitsch M, Funcke J-B, Lennerz B, Kuhnle-Krahl U, Lahr G, Debatin K-M, et al. Biologically inactive leptin and early-onset extreme obesity. New Engl J Med. 2015;372:48–54. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1406653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Mammes O, Betoulle D, Aubert R, Herbeth B, Siest G, Fumeron F. Association of the G-2548A polymorphism in the 5′ region of the LEP gene with overweight. Ann Hum Genet. 2000;64:391–394. doi: 10.1017/s0003480000008277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Li WD, Reed DR, Lee JH, Xu W, Kilker RL, Sodam BR, et al. Sequence variants in the 5′ flanking region of the leptin gene are associated with obesity in women. Ann Hum Genet. 1999;63:227–234. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-1809.1999.6330227.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Yu Z, Han S, Cao X, Zhu C, Wang X, Guo X. Genetic polymorphisms in adipokine genes and the risk of obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obesity. 2011;20:396–406. doi: 10.1038/oby.2011.148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Yevtushenko OO, Cooper SJ, O'Neill R, Doherty JK, Woodside JV, Reynolds GP. Influence of 5-HT2C receptor and leptin gene polymorphisms, smoking and drug treatment on metabolic disturbances in patients with schizophrenia. Br J Psychiatry. 2008;192:424–428. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.107.041723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Kuo PH, Kao CF, Chen PY, Chen CH, Tsai YS, Lu ML, et al. Polymorphisms of INSIG2, MC4R, and LEP are associated with obesity- and metabolic-related traits in schizophrenic patients. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2011;31:705–711. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0b013e318234ee84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Brandl EJ, Frydrychowicz C, Tiwari AK, Lett TA, Kitzrow W, Buttner S, et al. Association study of polymorphisms in leptin and leptin receptor genes with antipsychotic-induced body weight gain. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2012;38:134–141. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2012.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Nurmi EL, Spilman SL, Whelan F, Scahill LL, Aman MG, McDougle CJ, et al. Moderation of antipsychotic-induced weight gain by energy balance gene variants in the RUPP autism network risperidone studies. Transl Psychiatry. 2013;3:e274. doi: 10.1038/tp.2013.26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Fernandez E, Carrizo E, Fernandez V, Connell L, Sandia I, Prieto D, et al. Polymorphisms of the LEP- and LEPR genes, metabolic profile after prolonged clozapine administration and response to the antidiabetic metformin. Schizophr Res. 2010;121:213–217. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2010.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Perez-Iglesias R, Mata I, Amado JA, Berja A, Garcia-Unzueta MT, Martinez Garcia O, et al. Effect of FTO, SH2B1, LEP, and LEPR polymorphisms on weight gain associated with antipsychotic treatment. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2010;30:661–666. doi: 10.1097/jcp.0b013e3181fae248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Gregoor JG, van der Weide J, Mulder H, Cohen D, van Megen HJ, Egberts AC, et al. Polymorphisms of the LEP- and LEPR gene and obesity in patients using antipsychotic medication. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2009;29:21–25. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0b013e31819359be. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Tiwari AK, Zai CC, Likhodi O, Lisker A, Singh D, Souza RP, et al. A common polymorphism in the cannabinoid receptor 1 (CNR1) gene is associated with antipsychotic-induced weight gain in schizophrenia. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2010;35:1315–1324. doi: 10.1038/npp.2009.235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Gregoor JG, van der Weide J, Loovers HM, van Megen HJ, Egberts TC, Heerdink ER. Association between LEP and LEPR gene polymorphisms and dyslipidemia in patients using atypical antipsychotic medication. Psychiatr Genet. 2010;20:311–316. doi: 10.1097/YPG.0b013e32833b6378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Roffeei SN, Mohamed Z, Reynolds GP, Said MA, Hatim A, Mohamed EH, et al. Association of FTO, LEPR and MTHFR gene polymorphisms with metabolic syndrome in schizophrenia patients receiving antipsychotics. Pharmacogenomics. 2014;15:477–485. doi: 10.2217/pgs.13.220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Cone RD. Anatomy and regulation of the central melanocortin system. Nat Neurosci. 2005;8:571–578. doi: 10.1038/nn1455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Van der Ploeg LH, Martin WJ, Howard AD, Nargund RP, Austin CP, Guan X, et al. A role for the melanocortin 4 receptor in sexual function. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:11381–11386. doi: 10.1073/pnas.172378699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Caruso C, Durand D, Schioth HB, Rey R, Seilicovich A, Lasaga M. Activation of melanocortin 4 receptors reduces the inflammatory response and prevents apoptosis induced by lipopolysaccharide and interferon-gamma in astrocytes. Endocrinology. 2007;148:4918–4926. doi: 10.1210/en.2007-0366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Chu HC, Xia JL, Xu HM, Yang Z, Gao J, Liu SH. Melanocortin 4 receptor mediates neuropathic pain through p38MAPK in spinal cord. Can J Neurol Sci. 2012;39:458–464. doi: 10.1017/s0317167100013962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Sohn JW, Harris LE, Berglund ED, Liu T, Vong L, Lowell BB, et al. Melanocortin 4 receptors reciprocally regulate sympathetic and parasympathetic preganglionic neurons. Cell. 2013;152:612–619. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.12.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Mountjoy KG, Mortrud MT, Low MJ, Simerly RB, Cone RD. Localization of the melanocortin-4 receptor (MC4-R) in neuroendocrine and autonomic control circuits in the brain. Mol Endocrinol. 1994;8:1298–1308. doi: 10.1210/mend.8.10.7854347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Lam DD, Przydzial MJ, Ridley SH, Yeo GS, Rochford JJ, O'Rahilly S, et al. Serotonin 5-HT2C receptor agonist promotes hypophagia via downstream activation of melanocortin 4 receptors. Endocrinology. 2008;149:1323–1328. doi: 10.1210/en.2007-1321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Seeley RJ, Yagaloff KA, Fisher SL, Burn P, Thiele TE, van Dijk G, et al. Melanocortin receptors in leptin effects. Nature. 1997;390:349. doi: 10.1038/37016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Huszar D, Lynch CA, Fairchild-Huntress V, Dunmore JH, Fang Q, Berkemeier LR, et al. Targeted disruption of the melanocortin-4 receptor results in obesity in mice. Cell. 1997;88:131–141. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81865-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Farooqi IS, Keogh JM, Yeo GS, Lank EJ, Cheetham T, O'Rahilly S. Clinical spectrum of obesity and mutations in the melanocortin 4 receptor gene. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:1085–1095. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa022050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Yilmaz Z, Davis C, Loxton NJ, Kaplan AS, Levitan RD, Carter JC, et al. Association between MC4R rs17782313 polymorphism and overeating behaviors. Int J Obesity (Lond) 2015;39:114–120. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2014.79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Malhotra AK, Correll CU, Chowdhury NI, Müller DJ, Gregersen PK, Lee AT, et al. Association between common variants near the melanocortin 4 receptor gene and severe antipsychotic drug-induced weight gain. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2012;69:904–912. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2012.191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Loos RJ, Lindgren CM, Li S, Wheeler E, Zhao JH, Prokopenko I, et al. Common variants near MC4R are associated with fat mass, weight and risk of obesity. Nat Genet. 2008;40:768–775. doi: 10.1038/ng.140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Chambers JC, Elliott P, Zabaneh D, Zhang W, Li Y, Froguel P, et al. Common genetic variation near MC4R is associated with waist circumference and insulin resistance. Nat Genet. 2008;40:716–718. doi: 10.1038/ng.156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Czerwensky F, Leucht S, Steimer W. MC4R rs489693: a clinical risk factor for second generation antipsychotic-related weight gain? Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2013;16:2103–2109. doi: 10.1017/S1461145713000849. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Chowdhury NI, Tiwari AK, Souza RP, Zai CC, Shaikh SA, Chen S, et al. Genetic association study between antipsychotic-induced weight gain and the melanocortin-4 receptor gene. Pharmacogenomics J. 2013;13:272–279. doi: 10.1038/tpj.2011.66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Czerwensky F, Leucht S, Steimer W. Association of the common MC4R rs17782313 polymorphism with antipsychotic-related weight gain. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2013;33:74–79. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0b013e31827772db. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Goyette P, Sumner JS, Milos R, Duncan AM, Rosenblatt DS, Matthews RG, et al. Human methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase: isolation of cDNA, mapping and mutation identification. Nat Genet. 1994;7:195–200. doi: 10.1038/ng0694-195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Ueland PM, Hustad S, Schneede J, Refsum H, Vollset SE. Biological and clinical implications of the MTHFR C677T polymorphism. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2001;22:195–201. doi: 10.1016/s0165-6147(00)01675-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Frosst P, Blom HJ, Milos R, Goyette P, Sheppard CA, Matthews RG, et al. A candidate genetic risk factor for vascular disease: a common mutation in methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase. Nat Genet. 1995;10:111–113. doi: 10.1038/ng0595-111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.van der Put NM, Gabreels F, Stevens EM, Smeitink JA, Trijbels FJ, Eskes TK, et al. A second common mutation in the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene: an additional risk factor for neural-tube defects? Am J Hum Genet. 1998;62:1044–1051. doi: 10.1086/301825. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Klerk M, Verhoef P, Clarke R, Blom HJ, Kok FJ, Schouten EG, et al. MTHFR 677C->T polymorphism and risk of coronary heart disease: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2002;288:2023–2031. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.16.2023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Muntjewerff JW, Kahn RS, Blom HJ, den Heijer M. Homocysteine, methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase and risk of schizophrenia: a meta-analysis. Mol Psychiatry. 2006;11:143–149. doi: 10.1038/sj.mp.4001746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Nishi A, Numata S, Tajima A, Kinoshita M, Kikuchi K, Shimodera S, et al. Meta-analyses of blood homocysteine levels for gender and genetic association studies of the MTHFR C677T polymorphism in schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 2014;40:1154–1163. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbt154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Ellingrod VL, Miller DD, Taylor SF, Moline J, Holman T, Kerr J. Metabolic syndrome and insulin resistance in schizophrenia patients receiving antipsychotics genotyped for the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) 677C/T and 1298A/C variants. Schizophr Res. 2008;98:47–54. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2007.09.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Ellingrod VL, Taylor SF, Dalack G, Grove TB, Bly MJ, Brook RD, et al. Risk factors associated with metabolic syndrome in bipolar and schizophrenia subjects treated with antipsychotics: the role of folate pharmacogenetics. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2012;32:261–265. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0b013e3182485888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Devlin AM, Ngai YF, Ronsley R, Panagiotopoulos C. Cardiometabolic risk and the MTHFR C677T variant in children treated with second-generation antipsychotics. Transl Psychiatry. 2012;2:e71. doi: 10.1038/tp.2011.68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Kao AC, Rojnic Kuzman M, Tiwari AK, Zivkovic MV, Chowdhury NI, Medved V, et al. Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene variants and antipsychotic-induced weight gain and metabolic disturbances. J Psychiatr Res. 2014;54:36–42. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2014.03.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Srisawat U, Reynolds GP, Zhang ZJ, Zhang XR, Arranz B, San L, et al. Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) 677C/T polymorphism is associated with antipsychotic-induced weight gain in first-episode schizophrenia. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2014;17:485–490. doi: 10.1017/S1461145713001375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.van Winkel R, Rutten BP, Peerbooms O, Peuskens J, van Os J, De Hert M. MTHFR and risk of metabolic syndrome in patients with schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2010;121:193–198. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2010.05.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.van Winkel R, Moons T, Peerbooms O, Rutten B, Peuskens J, Claes S, et al. MTHFR genotype and differential evolution of metabolic parameters after initiation of a second generation antipsychotic: an observational study. Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2010;25:270–276. doi: 10.1097/YIC.0b013e32833bc60d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Marini NJ, Gin J, Ziegle J, Keho KH, Ginzinger D, Gilbert DA, et al. The prevalence of folate-remedial MTHFR enzyme variants in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:8055–8060. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0802813105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Oeschger FM, Wang WZ, Lee S, Garcia-Moreno F, Goffinet AM, Arbones ML, et al. Gene expression analysis of the embryonic subplate. Cereb Cortex. 2012;22:1343–1359. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhr197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Brandl EJ, Tiwari AK, Zai CC, Nurmi EL, Chowdhury NI, Arenovich T, et al. Genome-wide association study on antipsychotic-induced weight gain in the CATIE sample. Pharmacogenomics J. doi: 10.1038/tpj.2015.59. DOI: 10.1038/tpj.2015.59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Kennedy JL, Altar CA. Clinical Utility and Enhancements of a Pharmacogenomic Decision Support Tool for Mental Health Patients. Ottawa: GenomeCanada; 2015. http://www.genomecanada.ca/medias/pdf/en/clinical-utility-improvements-pharmacogenomic-decision-support-tool.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Gough AC, Smith CA, Howell SM, Wolf CR, Bryant SP, Spurr NK. Localization of the CYP2D gene locus to human chromosome 22q13.1 by polymerase chain reaction, in situ hybridization, and linkage analysis. Genomics. 1993;15:430–432. doi: 10.1006/geno.1993.1082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Chinta SJ, Pai HV, Upadhya SC, Boyd MR, Ravindranath V. Constitutive expression and localization of the major drug metabolizing enzyme, cytochrome P4502D6 in human brain. Brain Res. 2002;103:49–61. doi: 10.1016/s0169-328x(02)00177-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Kalman LV, Agundez JA, Appell ML, Black JL, Bell GC, Boukouvala S, et al. Pharmacogenetic Allele Nomenclature: International Workgroup Recommendations for Test Result Reporting. Clin Pharmacol Ther. doi: 10.1002/cpt.280. DOI: 10.1002/cpt.280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Bertilsson L, Dahl ML, Dalen P, Al-Shurbaji A. Molecular genetics of CYP2D6: clinical relevance with focus on psychotropic drugs. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2002;53:111–122. doi: 10.1046/j.0306-5251.2001.01548.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Thelma B, Srivastava V, Tiwari AK. Genetic underpinnings of tardive dyskinesia: passing the baton to pharmacogenetics. Pharmacogenomics. 2008;9:1285–1306. doi: 10.2217/14622416.9.9.1285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Kobylecki CJ, Jakobsen KD, Hansen T, Jakobsen IV, Rasmussen HB, Werge T. CYP2D6 genotype predicts antipsychotic side effects in schizophrenia inpatients: a retrospective matched case-control study. Neuropsychobiology. 2009;59:222–226. doi: 10.1159/000223734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Crescenti A, Mas S, Gasso P, Parellada E, Bernardo M, Lafuente A. CYP2D6*3, *4, *5 and *6 polymorphisms and antipsychotic-induced extrapyramidal side-effects in patients receiving antipsychotic therapy. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2008;35:807–811. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1681.2008.04918.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Fleeman N, Dundar Y, Dickson R, Jorgensen A, Pushpakom S, McLeod C, et al. Cytochrome P450 testing for prescribing antipsychotics in adults with schizophrenia: systematic review and meta-analyses. Pharmacogenomics J. 2011;11:1–14. doi: 10.1038/tpj.2010.73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Koola MM, Tsapakis EM, Wright P, Smith S, Kerwin Rip RW, Nugent KL, et al. Association of tardive dyskinesia with variation in CYP2D6: is there a role for active metabolites? J Psychopharmacol. 2014;28:665–670. doi: 10.1177/0269881114523861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Gasso P, Papagianni K, Mas S, de Bobadilla RF, Arnaiz JA, Bernardo M, et al. Relationship between CYP2D6 genotype and haloperidol pharmacokinetics and extrapyramidal symptoms in healthy volunteers. Pharmacogenomics. 2013;14:1551–1563. doi: 10.2217/pgs.13.150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Gasso P, Mas S, Papagianni K, Ferrando E, de Bobadilla RF, Arnaiz JA, et al. Effect of CYP2D6 on risperidone pharmacokinetics and extrapyramidal symptoms in healthy volunteers: results from a pharmacogenetic clinical trial. Pharmacogenomics. 2014;15:17–28. doi: 10.2217/pgs.13.204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Locatelli I, Kastelic M, Koprivsek J, Kores-Plesnicar B, Mrhar A, Dolzan V, et al. A population pharmacokinetic evaluation of the influence of CYP2D6 genotype on risperidone metabolism in patients with acute episode of schizophrenia. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2010;41:289–298. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2010.06.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Tsai HT, Caroff SN, Miller DD, McEvoy J, Lieberman JA, North KE, et al. A candidate gene study of tardive dyskinesia in the CATIE schizophrenia trial. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2010;153B:336–340. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.b.30981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Jovanovic N, Bozina N, Lovric M, Medved V, Jakovljevic M, Peles AM. The role of CYP2D6 and ABCB1 pharmacogenetics in drug-naive patients with first-episode schizophrenia treated with risperidone. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2010;66:1109–1117. doi: 10.1007/s00228-010-0850-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Tyren M, Arinda E, Connie M, Louw R, Werdie vS, Michael SP. Risperidone-associated adverse drug reactions and CYP2D6 polymorphisms in a South African cohort. Appl Transl Genomic. 2015;5:40–46. doi: 10.1016/j.atg.2015.05.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Seeman P. Atypical antipsychotics: mechanism of action. Can J Psychiatry. 2002;47:27–38. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Graybiel AM, Aosaki T, Flaherty AW, Kimura M. The basal ganglia and adaptive motor control. Science. 1994;265:1826–1831. doi: 10.1126/science.8091209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Margolese HC, Chouinard G, Kolivakis TT, Beauclair L, Miller R. Tardive dyskinesia in the era of typical and atypical antipsychotics. 1. Pathophysiology and mechanisms of induction. Can J Psychiatry. 2005;50:541–547. doi: 10.1177/070674370505000907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Marsden CD, Jenner P. The pathophysiology of extrapyramidal side-effects of neuroleptic drugs. Psychol Med. 1980;10:55–72. doi: 10.1017/s003329170003960x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Zai CC, De Luca V, Hwang RW, Voineskos A, Müller DJ, Remington G, et al. Meta- analysis of two dopamine D2 receptor gene polymorphisms with tardive dyskinesia in schizophrenia patients. Mol Psychiatry. 2007;12:794–795. doi: 10.1038/sj.mp.4002023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Bakker PR, van Harten PN, van Os J. Antipsychotic-induced tardive dyskinesia and polymorphic variations in COMT, DRD2, CYP1A2 and MnSOD genes: a meta-analysis of pharmacogenetic interactions. Mol Psychiatry. 2008;13:544–556. doi: 10.1038/sj.mp.4002142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Koning JP, Vehof J, Burger H, Wilffert B, Al Hadithy A, Alizadeh B, et al. Association of two DRD2 gene polymorphisms with acute and tardive antipsychotic-induced movement disorders in young Caucasian patients. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2012;219:727–736. doi: 10.1007/s00213-011-2394-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Park YM, Kang SG, Choi JE, Kim YK, Kim SH, Park JY, et al. No evidence for an association between dopamine D2 receptor polymorphisms and tardive dyskinesia in Korean schizophrenia patients. Psychiatry Investig. 2011;8:49–54. doi: 10.4306/pi.2011.8.1.49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Zai CC, Tiwari AK, Mazzoco M, de Luca V, Müller DJ, Shaikh SA, et al. Association study of the vesicular monoamine transporter gene SLC18A2 with tardive dyskinesia. J Psychiatr Res. 2013;47:1760–1765. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2013.07.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Bishop JR, Schuksz M, Esko JD. Heparan sulphate proteoglycans fine-tune mammalian physiology. Nature. 2007;446:1030–1037. doi: 10.1038/nature05817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Nishida T, Kubota S, Fukunaga T, Kondo S, Yosimichi G, Nakanishi T, et al. CTGF/Hcs24, hypertrophic chondrocyte-specific gene product, interacts with perlecan in regulating the proliferation and differentiation of chondrocytes. J Cell Physiol. 2003;196:265–275. doi: 10.1002/jcp.10277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Fuki II, Iozzo RV, Williams KJ. Perlecan heparan sulfate proteoglycan. A novel receptor that mediates a distinct pathway for ligand catabolism. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:31554. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Inada T, Koga M, Ishiguro H, Horiuchi Y, Syu A, Yoshio T, et al. Pathway-based association analysis of genome-wide screening data suggest that genes associated with the gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor signaling pathway are involved in neuroleptic-induced, treatment-resistant tardive dyskinesia. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2008;18:317–323. doi: 10.1097/FPC.0b013e3282f70492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Syu A, Ishiguro H, Inada T, Horiuchi Y, Tanaka S, Ishikawa M, et al. Association of the HSPG2 gene with neuroleptic-induced tardive dyskinesia. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2010;35:1155–1164. doi: 10.1038/npp.2009.220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Greenbaum L, Alkelai A, Zozulinsky P, Kohn Y, Lerer B. Support for association of HSPG2 with tardive dyskinesia in Caucasian populations. Pharmacogenomics J. 2012;12:513–520. doi: 10.1038/tpj.2011.32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Bakker PR, Al Hadithy AF, Amin N, van Duijn CM, van Os J, van Harten PN. Antipsychotic-induced movement disorders in long-stay psychiatric patients and 45 tag SNPs in 7 candidate genes: a prospective study. PLoS One. 2012;7:e50970. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0050970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Lin L, Long LK, Hatch MM, Hoffman DA. DPP6 domains responsible for its localization and function. J Biol Chem. 2014;289:32153–32165. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.578070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Tanaka S, Syu A, Ishiguro H, Inada T, Horiuchi Y, Ishikawa M, et al. DPP6 as a candidate gene for neuroleptic-induced tardive dyskinesia. Pharmacogenomics J. 2013;13:27–34. doi: 10.1038/tpj.2011.36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Emond MJ, Louie T, Emerson J, Zhao W, Mathias RA, Knowles MR, et al. Exome sequencing of extreme phenotypes identifies DCTN4 as a modifier of chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in cystic fibrosis. Nat Genet. 2012;44:886–889. doi: 10.1038/ng.2344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Lanktree MB, Hegele RA, Schork NJ, Spence JD. Extremes of unexplained variation as a phenotype: an efficient approach for genome-wide association studies of cardiovascular disease. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2010;3:215–221. doi: 10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.109.934505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Cordell HJ. Detecting gene-gene interactions that underlie human diseases. Nat Rev Genet. 2009;10:392–404. doi: 10.1038/nrg2579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Lee S, Kim Y, Kwon MS, Park T. A comparative study on multifactor dimensionality reduction methods for detecting gene-gene interactions with the survival phenotype. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:671859. doi: 10.1155/2015/671859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Li J, Huang D, Guo M, Liu X, Wang C, Teng Z, et al. A gene-based information gain method for detecting gene-gene interactions in case-control studies. Eur J Hum Genet. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2015.16. DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2015.16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Jiang X, Neapolitan RE. LEAP: biomarker inference through learning and evaluating association patterns. Genet Epidemiol. 2015;39:173–184. doi: 10.1002/gepi.21889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Lan TH, Loh EW, Wu MS, Hu TM, Chou P, Lan TY, et al. Performance of a neuro-fuzzy model in predicting weight changes of chronic schizophrenic patients exposed to antipsychotics. Mol Psychiatry. 2008;13:1129–1137. doi: 10.1038/sj.mp.4002128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Maranville JC, Cox NJ. Pharmacogenomic variants have larger effect sizes than genetic variants associated with other dichotomous complex traits. Pharmacogenomics J. doi: 10.1038/tpj.2015.47. DOI: 10.1038/tpj.2015.47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Molecular Neuropsychiatry are provided here courtesy of Karger Publishers

RESOURCES