Abstract
Under the auspices of the Welsh Standing Specialist Advisory Working Group in Microbiology (WMG) 10 clinical microbiology laboratories in Wales undertook a collaborative study to assess 10 commercial kits for the identification of aerobic Gram negative bacilli. In excess of 1000 such strains were examined in parallel with each kit system. Accuracy, reproducibility of accuracy, and reproducibility alone were assessed, together with the cost effectiveness of the kits used. A ranking order of kit performance based on the above variables was drawn up.
Full text
PDFSelected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Barry A. L., Badal R. E. Rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae with the micro-ID system versus API 20E and conventional media. J Clin Microbiol. 1979 Sep;10(3):293–298. doi: 10.1128/jcm.10.3.293-298.1979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- D'Amato R. F., Holmes B., Bottone E. J. The systems approach to diagnostic microbiology. Crit Rev Microbiol. 1981;9(1):1–44. doi: 10.3109/10408418109104485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hayek L. J., Willis G. W. Identification of the Enterobacteriaceae: a comparison of the Enterotube II with the API 20E. J Clin Pathol. 1984 Mar;37(3):344–347. doi: 10.1136/jcp.37.3.344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Holmes B., Willcox W. R., Lapage S. P. Identification of Enterobacteriaceae by the API 20E system. J Clin Pathol. 1978 Jan;31(1):22–30. doi: 10.1136/jcp.31.1.22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]