Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Pathology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Pathology
. 1997 Aug;50(8):691–694. doi: 10.1136/jcp.50.8.691

Audit of necropsy reporting in East Anglia.

J O Williams 1, M J Goddard 1, G A Gresham 1, B A Wyatt 1
PMCID: PMC500123  PMID: 9301556

Abstract

AIMS: To establish criteria for the information to be included in a necropsy report, and to improve the quality of necropsy reporting in the Anglia Region. METHODS: Discussion between Anglia histopathologists, based on the guidelines of the Royal College of Pathologists, led to a consensus about the ideal content of a necropsy report. Fifteen consecutive necropsies subsequently undertaken by each consultant were assessed against agreed standards. Reaudit was undertaken nearly two years later, without prior announcement. RESULTS: The initial standards achieved for demographic details (70%), history (87%), external examination (43-97%), internal examination (76-95%), organ weights (73%), cause of death in OPCS format (94%), and conclusion (90%) were discussed by the group. Changes to necropsy reporting documentation were proposed. Reaudit showed improvement in nearly all categories. CONCLUSIONS: Necropsy reporting in East Anglia is currently carried out to a reasonably high standard, and improvements have occurred as a result of the audit. There was no evidence that reports on coroners' necropsies were of a lower standard than those done for the hospital. Improvement in the format of the documentation increases the likelihood that all relevant and important data are recorded.

Full text

PDF
692

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Britton M. The role of autopsies in medical audit: examples from a department of medicine. Qual Assur Health Care. 1993 Dec;5(4):287–290. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/5.4.287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cordner S. M. Deciding the cause of death after necropsy. Lancet. 1993 Jun 5;341(8858):1458–1460. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)90892-k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Kleiner D. E., Emmert-Buck M. R., Liotta L. A. Necropsy as a research method in the age of molecular pathology. Lancet. 1995 Oct 7;346(8980):945–948. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)91561-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. O'Sullivan J. P. The coroner's necropsy in sudden death: an under-used source of epidemiological information. J Clin Pathol. 1996 Sep;49(9):737–740. doi: 10.1136/jcp.49.9.737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Williams J. O., Goddard M. J., Gresham G. A., Wyatt B. A. The use of histopathology in the practice of necropsy. J Clin Pathol. 1997 Aug;50(8):695–698. doi: 10.1136/jcp.50.8.695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Pathology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES