Abstract
AIM: To assess the effectiveness of clinical audit in improving standards in histopathological reporting of mastectomy specimens. METHODS: Reports on mastectomy specimens containing tumour issued by non-specialist histopathologists in 1990, 1992, 1994, and 1996 were scored for their information content. There were 10 reports evaluated from each year. Before 1990 no reporting guidelines had been formulated within the department. The audits in 1992 and 1994 were performed after agreed written guidelines (including the establishment of six essential pieces of information), and in 1996 the specimens were reported using a proforma. RESULTS: There was a significant increase in information after the introduction of written guidelines but there was a reduction in information over time. In 1990 none of the 10 reports included all six pieces of mandatory information; in 1992 four of the reports contained all mandatory information; in 1994 only one report contained all mandatory information. The introduction of a proforma for reporting resulted in further significant improvement with all 10 reports in 1996 containing all mandatory information. CONCLUSIONS: Successive rounds of audit increases the standard of reporting in histopathology. There is a need for continuing monitoring of standards as these may deteriorate over time. Reporting complex specimens on a proforma has a significant beneficial effect on information content.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Bull A. D., Biffin A. H., Mella J., Radcliffe A. G., Stamatakis J. D., Steele R. J., Williams G. T. Colorectal cancer pathology reporting: a regional audit. J Clin Pathol. 1997 Feb;50(2):138–142. doi: 10.1136/jcp.50.2.138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Campbell F., Griffiths D. F. Quantitative audit of the content of histopathology reports. J Clin Pathol. 1994 Apr;47(4):360–361. doi: 10.1136/jcp.47.4.360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cross S. S., Bull A. D. Is the informational content of histopathological reports increasing? J Clin Pathol. 1992 Feb;45(2):179–180. doi: 10.1136/jcp.45.2.179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Leslie K. O., Rosai J. Standardization of the surgical pathology report: formats, templates, and synoptic reports. Semin Diagn Pathol. 1994 Nov;11(4):253–257. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miller J. M., Slater D. N. Do histopathology reports of primary cutaneous melanoma contain enough essential information? J Clin Pathol. 1996 Mar;49(3):202–204. doi: 10.1136/jcp.49.3.202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Parham D. M. The hidden increase in histopathologists' workload. J Clin Pathol. 1996 Aug;49(8):689–690. doi: 10.1136/jcp.49.8.689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]