Abstract
Background
Chronic HIV infection leads to marked depletion of CD4+ T cells in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract and increased microbial translocation measured by an increase in circulating lipopolysaccharide (LPS) levels. Here, we hypothesised that single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in genes encoding the Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) and CD14, the principal receptors for LPS, were associated with CD4+ T-cell recovery post-antiretroviral therapy (ART).
Methods
Prospective study of predominantly Caucasian HIV-infected subjects receiving suppressive ART for at least 12 months. We analysed the CD14 SNPs C-260T and the TLR4 SNPs A+896G, C+1196T. We also determined the levels of LPS and soluble CD14 (sCD14) in plasma samples collected pre- and post-ART initiation. CD4+ T-cell recovery was assessed by linear mixed models.
Results
Following ART, individuals with a TT genotype compared to a CT or CC genotype for CD14 C-260T SNP showed higher levels of sCD14 (p=0.008 and 0.003 respectively). The CC genotype for the CD14 C-260T SNP, compared to CT or TT and the TLR4 SNP (AC/GT) compared to the homozygous genotype (AA/CC) were both independently associated with enhanced long-term CD4+ T-cell recovery (>3 months; p<0.001).
Conclusions
Polymorphisms in CD14 and TLR4 are independently associated with long-term CD4+ T-cell recovery in HIV-infected individuals post-ART.
Keywords: C-260T CD14 SNP, HIV, CD4 recovery, microbial translocation, LPS, sCD14
INTRODUCTION
Combination antiretroviral therapy (ART) has led to a dramatic reduction in morbidity and mortality of individuals infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Successful clinical outcomes are dependent on adequate recovery of CD4+ T cells following ART [1]. Several studies have shown that ~30% of patients fail to restore CD4+ T-cell counts >500cells/μL despite years of suppressive therapy [2]. There is now increasing evidence to show that patients failing to achieve CD4+ T-cell counts >500 cells/μL are at increased risk of developing serious non-AIDS events [3], including cardiovascular disease (CVD), hypertension, liver disease, non-AIDS malignancies and neurocognitive impairment [4]. Recent studies suggest that normalization of CD4+ T-cell counts should be defined as >900cell/μL [5].
HIV disease progression is associated with increased adaptive and innate immune activation (IA) [6], which is multi-factorial including increased expansion of CMV-specific T cells [7] and persistent HIV RNA at low levels [8]. However, a major contributing factor to immune activation is the depletion of CD4+ T cells in gut-associated lymphoid tissue (GALT) during the acute HIV infection [9–11] leading to increased microbial translocation (MT). Upon initiation of ART, MT is reduced as measured by reduction in the circulating levels of lipopolysaccharide (LPS), but this rarely reaches the levels of HIV uninfected controls [9, 10, 12, 13]. A case-control study that compared CD4+ T-cell non-responders (CD4+ T-cell counts <200cells/μL after 24 months of suppressive ART) versus full responders (>400cells/μL after 24 months of suppressive ART), showed that LPS was significantly increased in non-responders [10].
Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) and CD14 expressed on macrophages, monocytes, dendritic cells (DCs) and neutrophils [14], are the main cellular sensors of LPS [15]. Binding of LPS to these receptors induces a signaling cascade leading to activation of NF-κB, and eventual secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines [16]. CD14 can also be found in plasma in a soluble form [17] and soluble CD14 (sCD14) is elevated in HIV-infected individuals despite long-term suppressive ART [18]. Elevated sCD14 has also been associated with CVD, neurological abnormalities, lymphoma and mortality in ART-treated HIV-infected individuals [4]. Collectively, these data demonstrate that host responses to elevated LPS levels could influence the rate of CD4+ T-cell recovery post-ART, and consequently to development of important clinical end-points in HIV disease.
Polymorphisms in the genes encoding for CD14 and TLR4 have been shown to determine responsiveness to LPS [19]. A common single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) found at position -260 of the CD14 promoter (where a C→T change occurs) enhances the transcriptional activity of CD14, which is associated with an increase in high-density membrane-bound CD14 on monocytes as well as elevated levels of sCD14 in tissue culture supernatants along with other pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α and IL-6 [20, 21]. Others have shown evidence for an association between the CD14 159TT genotype and inflammatory conditions including chronic periodontitis [22], myocardial infarction [23], Crohn’s disease [24], and susceptibility to brucellosis [25].
The main TLR4 SNPs that have been studied include A+896G (rs4986790) and C+1196T (rs4986791) [26]. Compared to non-carriers, carriers of A+896G/C+1196T showed blunted inflammatory responses to inhaled LPS [26] as well as reduced plasma IL-6, IL-1β and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels in response to LPS administration ex vivo [27]. Others have shown that both these TLR4 SNPs were associated with reduced prevalence of diabetic neuropathy in type 2 diabetes [28], and that carriers of these SNPs were more susceptible to severe bacterial infections [29, 30].
In this study, we hypothesized that SNPs in the TLR4 and CD14 genes will have an impact on CD4+ T-cell recovery in HIV-infected individuals following initiation of ART secondary to a change in response to LPS. Using multivariate analysis, we examined the clinical and biological factors associated with restoration of CD4+ T cells and found that both TLR4 and CD14 SNPs were independently associated with enhanced long-term CD4+ T-cell recovery.
METHODS
Patients
Patients were recruited from the Alfred Hospital and the Melbourne Sexual Health Centre (Melbourne, Australia) based on previously published inclusion criteria [13]. All plasma and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were collected at pre-ART, and one time-point at least 12 months after the initiation of ART. The clinical specimens were processed by standard protocols within 24hrs of collection. Demographic and clinical parameters such as date of birth, gender, HIV exposure category, diagnosis of AIDS-defining illnesses (ADIs) before initiation of ART, co-infection with hepatitis B and C viruses, and initial ART treatment regimen were obtained from the Victorian HIV Service Database of the Alfred Hospital. All CD4+ T-cell counts and plasma HIV RNA results were also collected longitudinally from ART initiation to the most recent data available. All participants provided written informed consent and the protocols were approved by the Research and Ethics Committee of Alfred Health.
CD14 and TLR4 genotyping
DNA was obtained from cryopreserved PBMCs. Genotyping of a common polymorphism in CD14, C-260T (rs2569190) and two common polymorphisms in the TLR4 gene, A+896G (rs4986790) and C+1196T (rs4986791) was performed using the Sequenom MassARRAY iPLEX platform at the Australian Genome Research Facility.
Plasma LPS and sCD14
MT was estimated by measuring LPS levels using a commercial chromogenic limulus amebocyte lysate (LAL) assay (Lonza Walkersville Inc., Walkersville, MD), and sCD14 levels using a Quantikine sCD14 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) as previously described [13]. All samples were assayed in duplicate, and samples from the same patient (i.e. pre- and post-ART samples) were always assayed on the same plate to minimise interassay variation. Additionally, two samples were used as internal quality control (QC) for each assay. The results of each plate were only included if the coefficient of variance (CV) of the two QC samples was <15%.
Statistical analysis
Genotype frequencies were tested for Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium by chi-square test. The association between TLR4 and CD14 SNPs, LPS and sCD14 was analysed using the Kruskal-Wallis test with a post-hoc two-tailed Mann-Whitney U test. Linear mixed model (LMM) regression analysis was used to adjust for differences in the LPS levels across the genotypes tested. Plasma levels of LPS and sCD14 of a paired-sample (pre- and post-ART) were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Piecewise regression by LMM was used to determine the association between TLR4 and CD14 SNPs with the rate of CD4+ T-cell recovery at two different time-periods separately (i.e. baseline to 3 months, and 3 months onwards) after ART initiation. The association between TLR4 and CD14 SNPs and other clinical parameters to CD4+ T-cell counts post-ART were first assessed using univariate LMM. Variables with p<0.2 were considered as candidates and included in the multivariate analysis. Variables with p<0.05 were considered as independent predictors. As CD4+ T-cell count was an outcome variable that was significantly skewed and was resistant to sensible transformation (log, square-root transformation) the use of maximum likelihood estimation was precluded. In this case generalised estimating equation (GEE) was used in the LMM analysis.
RESULTS
Patient demography and clinical characteristics
We recruited 156 Caucasian patients, and DNA was available from 125 patients. Cohort demographics and clinical details of the patients are described in Table 1. After initiation of ART, all patients had viral suppression (plasma HIV RNA <400copies/mL) throughout the follow-up period except three patients who had a single episode of virological failure (plasma HIV RNA >400copies/mL). The success rate of amplification to determine the genotype was 100%. Of the 125 patients examined, 54 were heterozygous and 34 homozygous for the CD14 -260T allele; and 12 heterozygous for the TLR-4 SNPs. There were no patients homozygous for the TLR4 SNPs. This resulted in an allele frequency of 0.49 for CD14 SNP (χ2 test p=0.13) and 0.048 for TLR4 SNPs (χ2 test p=0.573) that was in HWE. Both TLR4 SNPs A+896G and C+1196T were co-segregated.
Table 1.
Clinical and demographic details of the cohort
| Characteristics | No. (%) of patients (N=125) |
|
|---|---|---|
| Gender | ||
| Male | 113 | (90.4) |
| Female | 12 | (9.6) |
|
| ||
| Median of age at ART initiation (IQR), year | 40 | (34 – 48) |
|
| ||
| Positive for hepatitis C virus antibodies (Anti-HCV) | 11 | (8.8) |
|
| ||
| Positive for hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg) | 9 | (7.2) |
|
| ||
| Median nadir CD4+ T cell count (IQR), cell/μL | 202 | (114 – 284) |
|
| ||
| Median baseline viral load (IQR), copies/mL | 100,000 | (44,050 – 135,638) |
|
| ||
| Median time on ART (IQR), years | 2.4 | (1.6 – 4.5) |
|
| ||
| History of AIDS-defining illness | 31 | (24.8) |
|
| ||
| Trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole at ART initiation | 60 | (48) |
|
| ||
| ART regimen† | ||
| NNRTI-based | 91 | (72.8) |
| PI-based | 29 | (23.2) |
| Triple NRTI-based | 4 | (3.2) |
|
| ||
| CD14 (C-260T) genotype frequency | ||
| CC | 37 | (29.6) |
| CT | 54 | (43.2) |
| TT | 34 | (27.2) |
|
| ||
| TLR4 (A+869G and C+1196T) genotype frequency | ||
| AA/CC | 113 | (90.4) |
| AG/CT | 12 | (9.6) |
| GG/TT | 0 | (0) |
Data are no. (%) of patients, unless otherwise indicated. ART, antiretroviral therapy; CD14, cluster of differentiation-14; TLR4, Toll-like receptor-4; IQR, interquartile range; NNRTI, nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor; NRTI, nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor; PI, protease inhibitor.
one patient had no data of treatment regime.
Suppressive ART for 12 months resulted in significant decrease of plasma LPS and sCD14 levels
The effects of long-term suppressive ART on HIV viral load, CD4+ T-cell count MT and innate immune activation were assessed in plasma samples of patients before and at one time-point after at least 12 months of suppressive ART. We showed that both LPS and sCD14 levels were significantly reduced following ART (both p<0.0001) (Wilcoxon signed rank test, data not shown), consistent with multiple prior studies [9, 13, 31]. We found a weak correlation between sCD14 and LPS levels (r=0.2044; p=0.0222) pre-ART (Figure 1A), and also between pre-ART CD4+ T-cell count with LPS (r=−0.195; p=0.029) and sCD14 (r=−0.404; p<0.0001) (Figure 1B–C). Pre-ART HIV viral load was not correlated with plasma levels of LPS; whilst it correlated with the levels of sCD14 (r=0.329; p=0.0002), and inversely with CD4+ T-cell count (r=−0.268; p=0.003) (Figure 1D–F).
Figure 1. Correlation between CD4+ T-cell count, LPS, sCD14 levels and HIV viral load in plasma samples collected from patients before ART (light grey circles) and after ART (dark grey circles).

Spearman test was used to compare the correlation between these variables. sCD14, soluble CD14; LPS, lipopolysaccharide.
SNPs in CD14 but not TLR4 were associated with increased sCD14 levels post-ART
We next compared the levels of CD4+ T-cell count, LPS, sCD14 and HIV viral load in plasma among different CD14 and TLR4 genotypes. We found that CD4+ T-cell count and sCD14 in the post-ART samples was significantly different amongst the different CD14 genotypes (Kruskal-Wallis test, p=0.024 and p=0.006 respectively) but not in the pre-ART samples. A post-hoc analysisshowed that genotype CC was associated with significant higher level of CD4 T-cell count compared to CT (p=0.013; Mann Whiteny U test) and a trend of higher CD4 T-cell count compared to TT genotype (p=0.058) (Figure 2A, bottom left).
Figure 2. Clinical and plasma parameters pre-ART and post-ART in HIV-infected individuals with different SNPs in CD14 and TLR4.

The CD4+ T-cells, LPS, sCD14 and plasma HIV viral load in individuals with A. CD14-260 genotypes and B. TLR4 +896 genotypes. C. Spearman correlations in pre-ART samples between LPS and sCD14 (left panel), sCD14 and CD4+ T-cell count (middle panel) and LPS and CD4+ T-cell count (right panel), stratified by CD4+ T-cell count, viral load and SNPs in CD14 and TLR4. The bar represents the strength of association (r values) where bars point to the right for a positive association and to the left for a negative association. The light grey represents a p value >0.05 (non-significant association) and the dark grey represents a p value <0.05 (significant association), where **** <0.0001, *** <0.001 and ** <0.01 and * <0.05. KW, Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare across 3 genotypes. MN, Mann-Whitney U test, post-hoc test to compare the across 2 genotypes.
Genotype CC and CT were associated with lower levels of plasma sCD14 as compared to TT (p=0.0026 and p=0.083 respectively); whilst the difference between CC and CT were not significant (p=0.6) (Figure 2A). Using a regression model adjusted for LPS levels post-ART and years on ART, the CC genotype compared to the CC and CT genotypes was independently associated with lower sCD14 levels (hazard ratio [HR] −0.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] −0.13 – −0.077; p<0.001).
The CD14 genotypes were not associated with CD4+ T-cell count, plasma sCD14 and HIV viral load pre-ART, and LPS pre- and post-ART (Figure 2A, B). The TLR4 SNPs, A+896G and C+1196T were not associated with these four variables pre- or post-ART (Figure 2A, B). Together, we concluded that only the presence of CD14 CC genotype was associated with lower sCD14 levels post-ART.
The correlation of sCD14, LPS levels and CD4+ T-cell counts depends on the CD4 and plasma HIV viral load
As the plasma levels of LPS, sCD14 and CD4+ T-cell count were poorly correlated, we speculated if this could be influenced by the degree of immune recovery. We therefore performed a post-hoc analysis stratified by baseline CD4+ T-cell levels and plasma HIV viral load and showed that the levels of LPS and sCD14 were more strongly correlated in individuals with baseline CD4+ T-cell count <100 cells/μL (r=0.622; p=0.0009) and baseline HIV viral load >5log/mL (r=0.385; p=0.002). In this cohort, a similar correlation was not observed among individuals with baseline CD4 >100 cells/μL and HIV viral load <5log/mL. We also found that the levels of LPS and sCD14 were more strongly correlated in individuals with CD14 −260TT (r=0.484; p=0.0037) and TLR4 +896AA (r=0.246; p=0.008) the two genotypes that were associated with an increased responsiveness towards LPS stimulation (Figure 2C, left panel)
SNPs in CD14 and TLR4 were independently associated with enhanced CD4+ T-cell recovery
In order to assess the independent influence of CD14 and TLR4 SNPs on CD4+ T-cell recovery following suppressive ART, we performed multivariate piece-wise regression by LMM, controlling for clinical and biological factors that have previously been shown to be associated with CD4+ T-cell reconstitution. In general, recovery of CD4+ T cells during viral suppression occurs in two phases [32]. During the first 3 months of ART, the number of CD4+ T cells rapidly increases due to T-cell homeostasis [33, 34], improved thymic output [35] and redistribution of T cells into peripheral circulation [36], followed by a slower phase of T cell repopulation that takes up to several years post-ART and is largely driven by T-cell proliferation and enhanced thymic production [37]. Considering the biphasic pattern of CD4+ T-cell recovery, LMM was performed at two different time periods following initiation of ART i.e. from baseline to 3 months; and 4 months onwards as we have previously reported [38].
In unadjusted analyses from baseline to 3 months, multiple factors were significantly associated with early CD4+ T-cell recovery (Table 2). In adjusted analyses, baseline CD4+ T-cell counts (β-coefficient=0.87; 95% CI=0.779–0.966; p<0.001) was associated with enhanced early CD4+ T-cell recovery; whilst receiving a PI regimen (β-coefficient=−38.81; 95% CI=−67.39 – −10.23; p=0.008) was associated with decreased early CD4+ T-cell recovery (Table 2).
Table 2.
Predictors for CD4+ T-cell recovery from baseline to 3 months on ART
| Variable | Univariate Coef. (95% CI) | p value | Multivariate Coef. (95% CI) | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline CD4+ T-cell count, per 100 cells/μL | 0.90 (0.84,0.96) | <0.001 | 0.87 (0.779, 0.966) | <0.001 |
|
| ||||
| Log (Baseline viral load, per 100,000 copies/mL) | 0.0 (−0.00001, 0.00003) | 0.312 | … | … |
|
| ||||
| Time-dependent covariate viral load, per 100,000 copies/mL | −6.81 (−17.17, 3.56) | 0.198 | −2.23 (−8.035, 3.568) | 0.45 |
|
| ||||
| Age at ART initiation, year | −0.076 (−1.87, 1.72) | 0.933 | … | … |
|
| ||||
| ART regimen | ||||
| NNRTI regimena | … | … | … | … |
| PI regimen | −57.84 (−103.74, −11.94) | 0.014 | −38.81 (−67.39, −10.23) | 0.008 |
| Triple NRTI regimen | −79.49 (−184.03, 25.06) | 0.136 | −20.53 (−114.54, 73.47) | 0.669 |
|
| ||||
| Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole at ART initiation | −170.81 (−204.91, −136.71) | <0.001 | −17.63 (−47.59, 12.32) | 0.249 |
|
| ||||
| Pre-ART LPS level, per 100 pg/mL | −27.75 (−56.49, 1.00) | 0.059 | −3.32 (−22.19, 15.54) | 0.73 |
|
| ||||
| Post-ART LPS level, per 100 pg/mL | −26.26 (−103.92, 51.40) | 0.507 | … | … |
|
| ||||
| Log (Pre-ART sCD14 level, per 100,000 pg/mL) | −144.99 (−204.19, −85.78) | <0.001 | 13.69 (−30.32, 57.72) | 0.542 |
|
| ||||
| Log (Post-ART sCD14 level, per 100,000 pg/mL) | 93.62 (20.97, 166.27) | 0.012 | −9.61 (−61.7, 42.48) | 0.718 |
|
| ||||
| Previous AIDS-defining illness | ||||
| Yesa | … | … | … | … |
| No | 73.51 (31.70, 115.32) | 0.001 | 15.65 (−13.20, 44.50) | 0.288 |
|
| ||||
| Gender | ||||
| Malea | … | … | … | … |
| Female | −33.84 (−99.47, 31.79) | 0.312 | … | … |
|
| ||||
| Positive for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) | 53.81 (−21.96, 129.58) | 0.164 | −26.38 (−69.09, 16.34) | 0.226 |
|
| ||||
| Positive for hepatitis C virus antibody (Anti-HCV) | −64.00 (−126.85, −1.15) | 0.046 | 15.22 (−32.48, 62.93) | 0.532 |
|
| ||||
| Mode of transmission | ||||
| MSMa | … | … | … | … |
| IDU | −118.40 (−266.80, 29.30) | 0.118 | −63.33 (−160.14, 33.48) | 0.200 |
| MSM + IDU | −119.30 (−284.86, 46.27) | 0.158 | 79.55 (−27.84, 186.95) | 0.147 |
| Transfusion | −166.00 (−314.40, −17.60) | 0.028 | −58.89 (−221.99, 104.20) | 0.479 |
| Unknown | −108.31 (−156.14, −60.48) | <0.001 | −13.72 (−47.15, 19.72) | 0.421 |
|
| ||||
| CD14 SNP (C-260T) | ||||
| CC | −25.03 (−67.54, 17.49) | 0.249 | 16.64 (−11.48, 44.76) | 0.246 |
| T-carriagea | … | … | … | … |
|
| ||||
| TLR4 SNPs (A+896G & C+1196T)b | ||||
| AA/CC | … | … | … | … |
| AG/CT | 1.85 (−63.89, 67.58) | 0.956 | −6.01 (−51.55, 39.53) | 0.796 |
Univariate analyses by generalised estimating equation (GEE) using mixed-effect modelling were performed to identify potential predictors of CD4 recovery starting from baseline to 3 months post-ART. Variable for which p<0.2 were considered as candidates. The candidate predictors were then included in a multivariate GEE mixed-effect model and variables for which p<0.05 were considered as independent predictors.
ART, antiretroviral therapy; coef., coefficient; CI, confidence interval; NNRTI, non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor; NRTI, nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor; PI, protease inhibitor; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; sCD14, soluble CD14; IDU, injecting drug use; MSM, men having sex with men; TLR4, Toll-like receptor 4.
reference group
both TLR4 SNPs (A+896G & C+1196T) are co-segregated
Next, we investigated the determinants associated with late CD4+ T-cell recovery i.e. four months and beyond. Unadjusted analyses are shown in Table 3. In an adjusted model, multiple clinical parameters remained significant including baseline CD4+ T-cell count, age at ART initiation, receiving trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) therapy at the time of initiation of ART, post-ART LPS level, pre- and post-ART sCD14 levels, previous ADIs, gender, positive for HBV antigen, mode of HIV transmission as well as both CD14 and TLR4 genotype. Our preliminary analysis showed that individuals with CD14 -260CC compared to CT and TT had a higher CD4+ T-cell count (β-coefficient 117 (p=0.002) and 87 (p=0.0026) respectively). Therefore, TT and CT were combined and compared with CC in subsequent analyses. The pooled β-coefficient of CD14 -206CC genotype compared to CT/TT was independently associated with enhanced late CD4+ T-cell recovery (β-coefficient=65.71; 95% CI=42.51–88.92; p<0.001). In the same model, the TLR4 SNPs (AG/CT) as compared to the genotype AA/CC were also independently associated with enhanced late CD4+ T-cell recovery (β-coefficient =111.87; 95% CI=78.33–159.41; p<0.001) (Table 3).
Table 3.
Predictors for CD4+ T-cell recovery after 4 months on ART.
| Variable | Univariate Coef. (95% CI) | p value | Multivariate Coef. (95% CI) | p value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline CD4+ T-cell count, per 100 cells/μL | 0.80 (0.73, 0.87) | <0.001 | 0.69 (0.61, 0.78) | <0.001 |
|
| ||||
| Log (Baseline viral load, per 100,000 copies/mL) | −3.49e−6 (−0.001, 0.0) | 0.751 | … | … |
|
| ||||
| Time-dependent covariate viral load, per 100,000 copies/mL | 6.43 (−9356, 22.42) | 0.431 | … | … |
|
| ||||
| Age of ART started, year | −3.37 (−4.50, 2.25) | <0.001 | −3.64 (−4.73, −2.55) | <0.001 |
|
| ||||
| ART regimen | ||||
| NNRTI regimena | … | … | … | … |
| PI regimen | 9.52 (−17.07, 36.12) | 0.483 | … | … |
| Triple NRTI regimen | −35.86 (−101.81, 30.09) | 0.287 | … | … |
|
| ||||
| Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole at ART initiation | −217.41 (−239.53, −195.29) | <0.001 | −85.05 (−112.15, −57.96) | <0.001 |
|
| ||||
| Pre-ART LPS level, per 100 pg/mL | −39.86 (−56.08, −23.63) | <0.001 | −9.3 (−25.2, 6.6) | 0.252 |
|
| ||||
| Post-ART LPS level, per 100 pg/mL | −109.89 (−164.37, −55.41) | <0.001 | −95.78 (−145.83, −45.73) | <0.001 |
|
| ||||
| Log (Pre-ART sCD14 level, per 100,000 pg/mL) | −219.63 (−257.72, −181.54) | <0.001 | −94.04 (−139.0, −49.04) | <0.001 |
|
| ||||
| Log (Post-ART sCD14 level, per 100,000 pg/mL) | −60.44 (−104.36, −16.53) | 0.007 | 19.18 (−25.16, 63.52) | 0.397 |
|
| ||||
| Previous AIDS-defining illness | ||||
| Yesa | … | … | … | … |
| No | 49.36 (22.51, 76.21) | <0.001 | 75.73 (48.07, 103.38) | <0.001 |
|
| ||||
| History of virologic failure | ||||
| Yes | 121.45 (52.39, 190.52) | <0.001 | 52.3 (−16.61, 121.2) | 0.137 |
| Noa | … | … | … | … |
|
| ||||
| Gender | ||||
| Malea | … | … | … | … |
| Female | −52.84 (−93.73, −11.95) | 0.011 | −180.86 (−230.16, −131.55) | <0.001 |
|
| ||||
| Positive for hepatitis B surface antigen | 153.55 (107.92, 199.18) | <0.001 | 54.85 (13.37, 96.32) | 0.010 |
|
| ||||
| Positive for hepatitis C virus antibody | 13.87 (−26.45, 54.20) | 0.5 | … | … |
|
| ||||
| Mode of transmission | ||||
| MSMa | … | … | … | … |
| IDU | 68.84 (3.54, 134.15) | 0.039 | 32.20 (−39.16, 103.57) | 0.376 |
| MSM + IDU | 5.00 (−142.61, 152.61) | 0.947 | 181.77 (37.02, 326.51) | 0.014 |
| Transfusion | −227.55 (−344.01, −111.09) | <0.001 | −170.30 (−311.14, −29.46) | 0.018 |
| Unknown | −3.63 (−33.13, 25.86) | 0.809 | 30.79 (0.23, 61.35) | 0.048 |
|
| ||||
| CD14 SNP (C-260T) | ||||
| CC | 79.94 (55.47, 104.41) | <0.001 | 65.71 (42.51, 88.92) | <0.001 |
| T-carriagea | … | … | … | … |
|
| ||||
| TLR4 SNPs (A+896G & C+1196T)b | ||||
| AA/CCa | … | … | … | … |
| AG/CT | 16.38 (−23.99, 56.75) | 0.427 | 111.87 (78.33, 159.41) | <0.001 |
Univariate analyses by generalised estimating equation (GEE) using mixed-effect modelling were performed to identify potential predictors of CD4 recovery starting from 4th month onwards post-ART. Variable for which p<0.2 were considered as candidates. The candidate predictors were then included in a multivariate GEE mixed-effect model and variables for which p<0.05 were considered as independent predictors. ART, antiretroviral therapy; coef., coefficient; CI, confidence interval; NNRTI, non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor; NRTI, nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor; PI, protease inhibitor; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; sCD14, soluble CD14; IDU, injecting drug use; MSM, men having sex with men; TLR4, Toll-like receptor 4.
reference group
both TLR4 SNPs (A+896G & C+1196T) are co-segregated
DISCUSSION
In the present study, we sought to investigate the relationship of TLR4 and CD14 SNPs with LPS and sCD14 and CD4+ T-cell recovery in HIV-infected individuals who were on suppressive ART. We found significant associations between TLR4 and CD14 SNPs with the trajectory of late recovery of CD4+ T-cell counts following ART using LMM. In addition, using a multivariate analysis, we found that the TLR4 genotype +896AG/+1196CT and CD14 genotype -260CC were independently associated with enhanced late CD4+ T-cell recovery post-ART. Finally, we showed that plasma LPS and sCD14 were significantly correlated in HIV-infected participants with a CD4 T-cell count <100cells/μL, HIV viral load > 5 log/mL and in individuals carrying the CD14 -260TT and TLR4 +896AA SNPs, the genotypes associated with an increased responsiveness or sensitivity towards LPS stimulation.
In this study, we assessed the changes in CD4+ T-cell counts over time after initiation of ART as a continuous variable using GEE analysis, controlling for time varying covariates. Although several others have used Cox regression to study CD4+ T-cell recovery [39, 40], we believe that the LMM approach is more robust because it takes into account the heterogeneity in both the rate and magnitude of CD4+ T-cell count increases following ART [2, 41].
The TLR4 SNPS in exon 3 – A+896G and C+1196T – are common non-synonymous SNPs with replacement of an aspartic acid (Asp) residue with glycine (Gly) at amino acid position 299 (Asp299Gly); and threonine with an isoleucine at position 399 (Thr399Ile), respectively [42]. Both SNPs are known to affect the extracellular domain of TLR4. Nonetheless, the precise mechanism whereby these SNPs affect LPS signaling is not clearly understood. A recent study suggested that the SNPs could interfere with TLR4 dimerization, and therefore prevent the assembly of intracellular docking platforms for adapter recruitment leading to the hyporesponsiveness to LPS stimulation [43]. In line with this, we demonstrated in a multivariate model that carriage of TLR4 +896AG/+1196CT was associated with greater late CD4+ T-cell reconstitution, independent of LPS levels. However, since TLR4 +896AG was less prevalent (9.6%), we also felt that the SNP effect might have been masked by the effect of the more prevalent SNP i.e. CD14 -260CC (29.6%) in the univariate analysis. Therefore, the TLR4 +896AG SNP only showed its effect after the adjustment in multivariate model.
The SNP in the CD14 gene, C-260T (also known as C-159T) is a common genetic polymorphism, which occurs in the promoter region of the CD14 [44] and is reported to occur in ~48% of Caucasians [45]. This SNP (C→T) reportedly reduces the binding affinity of suppressor proteins (Sp) to its binding domain and hence enhances the promoter activity of CD14 [46]. Consistent with this finding, we found that the CC genotype was associated with lower plasma levels of sCD14 (and TT genotype with higher sCD14), independent of LPS. Interestingly, we only observed this in plasma collected post-ART. This potentially could be due the high level of immune activation pre-ART which may have masked the effects of CD14 C-260T SNPs.
We have recently examined the relationship of these same polymorphisms and cardiovascular disease in a cohort of individuals on ART recruited in Malaysia [47]. We are currently examining the relationship of these polymorphisms to CD4 recovery but given that this cohort is entirely Asian and they initiated ART late (median CD4 = 63 cells/μL compared to median CD4= 202 cells/μL in this manuscript), we anticipate that the relationship between the polymorphisms and CD4 recovery that we describe here may be quite different. Ideally, the relationship between the polymorphisms described here and CD4 recovery should be examined in a replicate cohort of similar ethnicity which we are currently planning.
There were a number of limitations in our study. First, although this was a longitudinal study, patients were enrolled post-ART and therefore samples were obtained at varying time-points following ART initiation. We adjusted for time between initiating ART and sample collection in the multivariate model, but our results could have been confounded by loss to follow up or death, although death is now significantly reduced in HIV-infected individuals on ART [48]. Second, only a small fraction of our patients were carriers of the rare allele for TLR4 SNPs, and therefore this analysis had less statistical power. Although there is a plausible biological basis to support our findings of the genetic association between TLR4 and CD14 SNPs and recovery of CD4+ T cells following ART, given the small sample size, these findings require confirmation in an independent cohort of similar ethnicity. Lastly, the CD4/CD8 T-cell ratio has previously been shown to be associated with T-cell activation, senescence, exhaustion [49] as well as a strong predictor of HIV disease progression, CD4 T cell recovery [40] and aging-related diseases [50, 51]. In this cohort, baseline CD8 data was available only from a limited number of patients, and therefore was not included in the analyses.
In summary, we demonstrated enhanced late CD4+ T-cell recovery in HIV-infected individuals receiving ART with SNPS in TLR4 +896AG/+1196CT and CD14 -260CC. Taken together, these data suggest that apart from MT, genetic polymorphisms that alter the host response to LPS stimulation could also be an important determinant of CD4+ T-cells reconstitution following ART. The current study provides the first evidence to show that CD4+ T-cell recovery in HIV-infected individuals on ART is associated with genotypes related to LPS metabolism. These findings, once repeated in an independent cohort, could potentially inform novel interventions to enhance CD4 recovery in those at greatest risk.
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to all the participants, clinical and laboratory staff of the Alfred Hospital and Melbourne Sexual Health Centre for assistance with patient recruitment, specimen collection and cooperation. We also thank Victorian HIV Blood and Tissue Bank and the Victorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory for access to stored samples. We thank Pushparaj Velayudham for his assistance and Reena Rajasuriar for helpful discussions and review of the manuscript.
Grant support.
This work was supported by a grant from the High Impact Research-Ministry of Higher Education, Malaysia (UM.C/625/1/HIR/MOHE/MED/01), University of Malaya Research Grant (UMRG) (RG448-12HTM) by the Health and Translational Medicine Research Cluster to EMS. SRL is supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia and the Delaney AIDS Research Enterprise (DARE), National Institutes of Health (U19 AI096109).
Footnotes
Disclosure of potential conflict of interest.
No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: YKY EMS SRL. Performed the experiments: YKY. Analyzed the data: YKY TS. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: AS, CKF, JE, JH, PC, AK. Wrote the manuscript: YKY EMS TS SRL.
Presented in part: 7th IAS Conference on HIV Pathogenesis, Treatment and Prevention. 30 June – 3 July 2013, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Abstract number: WEPE453
References
- 1.Falster K, Choi JY, Donovan B, Duncombe C, Mulhall B, Sowden D, et al. AIDS-related and non-AIDS-related mortality in the Asia-Pacific region in the era of combination antiretroviral treatment. AIDS. 2009;23:2323–2336. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e328331910c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kelley CF, Kitchen CM, Hunt PW, Rodriguez B, Hecht FM, Kitahata M, et al. Incomplete peripheral CD4+ cell count restoration in HIV-infected patients receiving long-term antiretroviral treatment. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;48:787–794. doi: 10.1086/597093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Zoufaly A, Cozzi-Lepri A, Reekie J, Kirk O, Lundgren J, Reiss P, et al. Immuno-virological discordance and the risk of non-AIDS and AIDS events in a large observational cohort of HIV-patients in Europe. PLoS One. 2014;9:e87160. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hsu DC, Sereti I, Ananworanich J. Serious Non-AIDS events: Immunopathogenesis and interventional strategies. AIDS Res Ther. 2013;10:29. doi: 10.1186/1742-6405-10-29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Okulicz JF, Le TD, Agan BK, Camargo JF, Landrum ML, Wright E, et al. Influence of the Timing of Antiretroviral Therapy on the Potential for Normalization of Immune Status in Human Immunodeficiency Virus 1-Infected Individuals. JAMA Intern Med. 2014 doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.4010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hunt PW. HIV and inflammation: mechanisms and consequences. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2012;9:139–147. doi: 10.1007/s11904-012-0118-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Shin LY, Sheth PM, Persad D, Kovacs C, Kain T, Diong C, et al. Impact of CMV therapy with valganciclovir on immune activation and the HIV viral load in semen and blood: an observational clinical study. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2014;65:251–258. doi: 10.1097/01.qai.0000435256.34306.c1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Taiwo B, Hunt PW, Gandhi RT, Ellingson A, McKenna M, Jacobson JM, et al. CD8+ T-cell activation in HIV-1-infected patients experiencing transient low-level viremia during antiretroviral therapy. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2013;63:101–104. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3182895af4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Brenchley JM, Price DA, Schacker TW, Asher TE, Silvestri G, Rao S, et al. Microbial translocation is a cause of systemic immune activation in chronic HIV infection. Nat Med. 2006;12:1365–1371. doi: 10.1038/nm1511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Marchetti G, Bellistri GM, Borghi E, Tincati C, Ferramosca S, La Francesca M, et al. Microbial translocation is associated with sustained failure in CD4+ T-cell reconstitution in HIV-infected patients on long-term highly active antiretroviral therapy. AIDS. 2008;22:2035–2038. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e3283112d29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Gordon SN, Cervasi B, Odorizzi P, Silverman R, Aberra F, Ginsberg G, et al. Disruption of intestinal CD4+ T cell homeostasis is a key marker of systemic CD4+ T cell activation in HIV-infected individuals. J Immunol. 2010;185:5169–5179. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1001801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Jiang W, Lederman MM, Hunt P, Sieg SF, Haley K, Rodriguez B, et al. Plasma levels of bacterial DNA correlate with immune activation and the magnitude of immune restoration in persons with antiretroviral-treated HIV infection. J Infect Dis. 2009;199:1177–1185. doi: 10.1086/597476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Rajasuriar R, Booth D, Solomon A, Chua K, Spelman T, Gouillou M, et al. Biological determinants of immune reconstitution in HIV-infected patients receiving antiretroviral therapy: the role of interleukin 7 and interleukin 7 receptor alpha and microbial translocation. J Infect Dis. 2010;202:1254–1264. doi: 10.1086/656369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Zanoni I, Granucci F. Role of CD14 in host protection against infections and in metabolism regulation. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2013;3:32. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2013.00032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Sabroe I, Jones EC, Usher LR, Whyte MK, Dower SK. Toll-like receptor (TLR)2 and TLR4 in human peripheral blood granulocytes: a critical role for monocytes in leukocyte lipopolysaccharide responses. J Immunol. 2002;168:4701–4710. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.168.9.4701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Coats SR, Pham TT, Bainbridge BW, Reife RA, Darveau RP. MD-2 mediates the ability of tetra-acylated and penta-acylated lipopolysaccharides to antagonize Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide at the TLR4 signaling complex. J Immunol. 2005;175:4490–4498. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.175.7.4490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Triantafilou M, Triantafilou K. Lipopolysaccharide recognition: CD14, TLRs and the LPS-activation cluster. Trends Immunol. 2002;23:301–304. doi: 10.1016/s1471-4906(02)02233-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Cassol E, Malfeld S, Mahasha P, van der Merwe S, Cassol S, Seebregts C, et al. Persistent microbial translocation and immune activation in HIV-1-infected South Africans receiving combination antiretroviral therapy. J Infect Dis. 2010;202:723–733. doi: 10.1086/655229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Mohamed JA, DuPont HL, Flores J, Palur H, Nair P, Jiang ZD, et al. Single nucleotide polymorphisms in the promoter of the gene encoding the lipopolysaccharide receptor CD14 are associated with bacterial diarrhea in US and Canadian travelers to Mexico. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52:1332–1341. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Eng HL, Wang CH, Chen CH, Chou MH, Cheng CT, Lin TM. A CD14 promoter polymorphism is associated with CD14 expression and Chlamydia-stimulated TNF alpha production. Genes Immun. 2004;5:426–430. doi: 10.1038/sj.gene.6364100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.de Aguiar BB, Girardi I, Paskulin DD, de Franca E, Dornelles C, Dias FS, et al. CD14 expression in the first 24h of sepsis: effect of −260C>T CD14 SNP. Immunol Invest. 2008;37:752–769. doi: 10.1080/08820130802403242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Holla LI, Buckova D, Fassmann A, Halabala T, Vasku A, Vacha J. Promoter polymorphisms in the CD14 receptor gene and their potential association with the severity of chronic periodontitis. J Med Genet. 2002;39:844–848. doi: 10.1136/jmg.39.11.844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Unkelbach K, Gardemann A, Kostrzewa M, Philipp M, Tillmanns H, Haberbosch W. A new promoter polymorphism in the gene of lipopolysaccharide receptor CD14 is associated with expired myocardial infarction in patients with low atherosclerotic risk profile. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1999;19:932–938. doi: 10.1161/01.atv.19.4.932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Klein W, Tromm A, Griga T, Fricke H, Folwaczny C, Hocke M, et al. A polymorphism in the CD14 gene is associated with Crohn disease. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2002;37:189–191. doi: 10.1080/003655202753416867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Haidari M, Hajilooi M, Rezazadeh M, Rafiei A, Alavi SA, Keramat F. Polymorphism in the promoter region of the CD14 gene and susceptibility to Brucellosis. Immunol Invest. 2006;35:239–245. doi: 10.1080/08820130600634568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Arbour NC, Lorenz E, Schutte BC, Zabner J, Kline JN, Jones M, et al. TLR4 mutations are associated with endotoxin hyporesponsiveness in humans. Nat Genet. 2000;25:187–191. doi: 10.1038/76048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Marsik C, Jilma B, Joukhadar C, Mannhalter C, Wagner O, Endler G. The Toll-like receptor 4 Asp299Gly and Thr399Ile polymorphisms influence the late inflammatory response in human endotoxemia. Clin Chem. 2005;51:2178–2180. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2005.051649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Rudofsky G, Jr, Reismann P, Witte S, Humpert PM, Isermann B, Chavakis T, et al. Asp299Gly and Thr399Ile genotypes of the TLR4 gene are associated with a reduced prevalence of diabetic neuropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2004;27:179–183. doi: 10.2337/diacare.27.1.179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Shalhub S, Junker CE, Imahara SD, Mindrinos MN, Dissanaike S, O’Keefe GE. Variation in the TLR4 gene influences the risk of organ failure and shock posttrauma: a cohort study. J Trauma. 2009;66:115–122. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181938d50. discussion 122–113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lorenz E, Mira JP, Frees KL, Schwartz DA. Relevance of mutations in the TLR4 receptor in patients with gram-negative septic shock. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162:1028–1032. doi: 10.1001/archinte.162.9.1028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Sandler NG, Wand H, Roque A, Law M, Nason MC, Nixon DE, et al. Plasma levels of soluble CD14 independently predict mortality in HIV infection. J Infect Dis. 2011;203:780–790. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiq118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Pakker NG, Notermans DW, de Boer RJ, Roos MT, de Wolf F, Hill A, et al. Biphasic kinetics of peripheral blood T cells after triple combination therapy in HIV-1 infection: a composite of redistribution and proliferation. Nat Med. 1998;4:208–214. doi: 10.1038/nm0298-208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Zhang ZQ, Notermans DW, Sedgewick G, Cavert W, Wietgrefe S, Zupancic M, et al. Kinetics of CD4+ T cell repopulation of lymphoid tissues after treatment of HIV-1 infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95:1154–1159. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.3.1154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Lempicki RA, Kovacs JA, Baseler MW, Adelsberger JW, Dewar RL, Natarajan V, et al. Impact of HIV-1 infection and highly active antiretroviral therapy on the kinetics of CD4+ and CD8+ T cell turnover in HIV-infected patients. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:13778–13783. doi: 10.1073/pnas.250472097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Douek DC, McFarland RD, Keiser PH, Gage EA, Massey JM, Haynes BF, et al. Changes in thymic function with age and during the treatment of HIV infection. Nature. 1998;396:690–695. doi: 10.1038/25374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Bucy RP, Hockett RD, Derdeyn CA, Saag MS, Squires K, Sillers M, et al. Initial increase in blood CD4(+) lymphocytes after HIV antiretroviral therapy reflects redistribution from lymphoid tissues. J Clin Invest. 1999;103:1391–1398. doi: 10.1172/JCI5863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Dion ML, Bordi R, Zeidan J, Asaad R, Boulassel MR, Routy JP, et al. Slow disease progression and robust therapy-mediated CD4+ T-cell recovery are associated with efficient thymopoiesis during HIV-1 infection. Blood. 2007;109:2912–2920. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-09-047308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Rajasuriar R, Booth DR, Gouillou M, Spelman T, James I, Solomon A, et al. The role of SNPs in the alpha-chain of the IL-7R gene in CD4+ T-cell recovery in HIV-infected African patients receiving suppressive cART. Genes Immun. 2012;13:83–93. doi: 10.1038/gene.2011.65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Kigozi BK, Sumba S, Mudyope P, Namuddu B, Kalyango J, Karamagi C, et al. The effect of AIDS defining conditions on immunological recovery among patients initiating antiretroviral therapy at Joint Clinical Research Centre, Uganda. AIDS Res Ther. 2009;6:17. doi: 10.1186/1742-6405-6-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Torti C, Prosperi M, Motta D, Digiambenedetto S, Maggiolo F, Paraninfo G, et al. Factors influencing the normalization of CD4+ T-cell count, percentage and CD4+/CD8+ T-cell ratio in HIV-infected patients on long-term suppressive antiretroviral therapy. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012;18:449–458. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03650.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Hunt PW, Deeks SG, Rodriguez B, Valdez H, Shade SB, Abrams DI, et al. Continued CD4 cell count increases in HIV-infected adults experiencing 4 years of viral suppression on antiretroviral therapy. AIDS. 2003;17:1907–1915. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200309050-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Schwartz DA. The role of TLR4 in endotoxin responsiveness in humans. J Endotoxin Res. 2001;7:389–393. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Figueroa L, Xiong Y, Song C, Piao W, Vogel SN, Medvedev AE. The Asp299Gly polymorphism alters TLR4 signaling by interfering with recruitment of MyD88 and TRIF. J Immunol. 2012;188:4506–4515. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1200202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Martinez FD. CD14, endotoxin, and asthma risk: actions and interactions. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2007;4:221–225. doi: 10.1513/pats.200702-035AW. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.The International HapMap Project. Nature. Vol. 426. The International HapMap Project; 2003. pp. 789–796. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.LeVan TD, Bloom JW, Bailey TJ, Karp CL, Halonen M, Martinez FD, et al. A common single nucleotide polymorphism in the CD14 promoter decreases the affinity of Sp protein binding and enhances transcriptional activity. J Immunol. 2001;167:5838–5844. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.167.10.5838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Rajasuriar R, Kong Y, Nadarajah R, Abdullah N, Spelman T, Yuhana M, et al. The CD14 C-260T single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) modulates monocyte/macrophage activation in treated HIV-infected individuals. J Transl Med. 2015;13:30. doi: 10.1186/s12967-015-0391-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Collaboration H-C, Ray M, Logan R, Sterne JA, Hernandez-Diaz S, Robins JM, et al. The effect of combined antiretroviral therapy on the overall mortality of HIV-infected individuals. AIDS. 2010;24:123–137. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e3283324283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Sainz T, Serrano-Villar S, Diaz L, Gonzalez Tome MI, Gurbindo MD, de Jose MI, et al. The CD4/CD8 ratio as a marker T-cell activation, senescence and activation/exhaustion in treated HIV-infected children and young adults. AIDS. 2013;27:1513–1516. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e32835faa72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Serrano-Villar S, Moreno S, Fuentes-Ferrer M, Sanchez-Marcos C, Avila M, Sainz T, et al. The CD4:CD8 ratio is associated with markers of age-associated disease in virally suppressed HIV-infected patients with immunological recovery. HIV Med. 2014;15:40–49. doi: 10.1111/hiv.12081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Tang J, Li X, Price MA, Sanders EJ, Anzala O, Karita E, et al. CD4:CD8 lymphocyte ratio as a quantitative measure of immunologic health in HIV-1 infection: findings from an African cohort with prospective data. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:670. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
