Abstract
AIM: To establish the diagnostic value of in situ hybridisation and the nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in detecting clinically relevant cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in upper gastrointestinal biopsies from heart transplant patients. METHODS: Test sensitivity and specificity for detection of CMV early gene RNA by in situ hybridisation and CMV intermediate early gene by PCR were established and then compared with haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and immunocytochemical detection of CMV in order to establish the best pathological diagnostic approach. All investigations were carried out on formalin fixed, paraffin embedded tissue. RESULTS: Nested PCR had the highest test sensitivity, followed by in situ hybridisation and immunocytochemistry with the same sensitivity; H&E had the lowest. H&E and immunocytochemistry were the most specific but both had a significant false negative rate which was less of a problem with PCR. However, PCR gave no other diagnostic information, and in situ hybridisation was no better than immunocytochemistry. Both in situ hybridisation and PCR were technically complex and more expensive. CONCLUSIONS: H&E and immunocytochemistry represent the best initial screen for CMV and other diseases in upper gastrointestinal biopsies from heart transplant patients. If H&E and immunocytochemistry were negative, nested PCR could significantly increase the diagnostic yield of clinically relevant CMV infection. In situ hybridisation appeared to have no advantages and some drawbacks compared with immunocytochemistry and PCR.
Full text
PDFImages in this article
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Brainard J. A., Greenson J. K., Vesy C. J., Tesi R. J., Papp A. C., Snyder P. J., Western L., Prior T. W. Detection of cytomegalovirus in liver transplant biopsies. A comparison of light microscopy, immunohistochemistry, duplex PCR and nested PCR. Transplantation. 1994 Jun 27;57(12):1753–1757. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen Y. T., Mercer G. O., Cheigh J. S., Mouradian J. A. Cytomegalovirus infection of renal allografts. Detection by polymerase chain reaction. Transplantation. 1992 Jan;53(1):99–102. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199201000-00019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chetty R., Roskell D. E. Cytomegalovirus infection in the gastrointestinal tract. J Clin Pathol. 1994 Nov;47(11):968–972. doi: 10.1136/jcp.47.11.968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cotte L., Drouet E., Bissuel F., Denoyel G. A., Trepo C. Diagnostic value of amplification of human cytomegalovirus DNA from gastrointestinal biopsies from human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients. J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Aug;31(8):2066–2069. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.8.2066-2069.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Einsele H., Steidle M., Vallbracht A., Saal J. G., Ehninger G., Müller C. A. Early occurrence of human cytomegalovirus infection after bone marrow transplantation as demonstrated by the polymerase chain reaction technique. Blood. 1991 Mar 1;77(5):1104–1110. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Johnson S. C., Stamm C. P., Hicks C. B. Tuberculous psoas muscle abscess following chemoprophylaxis with isoniazid in a patient with human immunodeficiency virus infection. Rev Infect Dis. 1990 Sep-Oct;12(5):754–756. doi: 10.1093/clinids/12.5.754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kusne S., Mañez R., Frye B. L., St George K., Abu-Elmagd K., Tabasco-Menguillon J., Fung J. J., Todo S., Rinaldo C., Ehrlich G. D. Use of DNA amplification for diagnosis of cytomegalovirus enteritis after intestinal transplantation. Gastroenterology. 1997 Apr;112(4):1121–1128. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(97)70122-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McNicol A. M., Farquharson M. A. In situ hybridization and its diagnostic applications in pathology. J Pathol. 1997 Jul;182(3):250–261. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9896(199707)182:3<250::AID-PATH837>3.0.CO;2-S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stratta R. J. Clinical patterns and treatment of cytomegalovirus infection after solid-organ transplantation. Transplant Proc. 1993 Oct;25(5 Suppl 4):15–21. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]