Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Clinical Pathology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Pathology
. 1993 May;46(5):394–397. doi: 10.1136/jcp.46.5.394

Effects of culture media on detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase negative staphylococci by disc diffusion methods.

L M Milne 1, M R Crow 1, A G Emptage 1, J B Selkon 1
PMCID: PMC501243  PMID: 8320317

Abstract

AIMS--To test 10 culture media for their ability to detect resistance and sensitivity of staphylococci to methicillin by disc diffusion. METHODS--Fifty strains of Staphylococcus aureus and 135 strains of coagulase negative staphylococci were tested using Columbia, Diagnostic Sensitivity Test, Mueller Hinton, Sensitest and Iso-sensitest agars with and without 5% added sodium chloride. Cultures were examined after 18 and 40 hours of incubation. The diameter of the zone and its characteristics were recorded and these media were assessed for their ability to produce clear, readable zones of inhibition. Changes in the variables which determined resistance were investigated. Results were analysed allowing a zone diameter reduction of 8 mm and 10 mm compared with the control in addition to the standard 6 mm. RESULTS--Columbia agar with added sodium chloride supported the growth of all strains, detected the highest number of resistant strains, and was the easiest to read. Resistance was detected after 18 hours in most resistant strains, but some required 40 hours of incubation. There was poor agreement, however, on this medium (63-94%) between disc diffusion and the reference MIC method for sensitive strains. Allowing a greater reduction in zone size resulted in more agreement with sensitive strains but with consequently lowered detection of resistant strains. The other media showed some growth failures and more zones that were difficult to read. More resistance was detected when incubation was prolonged to 40 hours but this was consistently less than on Columbia agar with added salt. CONCLUSIONS--None of the media detected all of the resistant strains. Columbia agar with added salt was the most satisfactory medium in this respect, but it misidentified up to 37% of the sensitive strains as resistant. Methicillin susceptibility testing by disc diffusion testing is unreliable.

Full text

PDF
395

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Annear D. I. The effect of temperature on resistance of Staphylococcus aureus to methicillin and some other antibioics. Med J Aust. 1968 Mar 16;1(11):444–446. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BARBER M. NATURALLY OCCURING METHICILLIN-RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCI. J Gen Microbiol. 1964 May;35:183–190. doi: 10.1099/00221287-35-2-183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brown D. F., Kothari D. The reliability of methicillin sensitivity tests on four culture media. J Clin Pathol. 1974 May;27(5):420–426. doi: 10.1136/jcp.27.5.420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brown D. F., Yates V. S. Methicillin susceptibility testing of Staphylococcus aureus on media containing five percent sodium chloride. Eur J Clin Microbiol. 1986 Dec;5(6):726–728. doi: 10.1007/BF02013313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cheng A. F., French G. L. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia in Hong Kong. J Hosp Infect. 1988 Aug;12(2):91–101. doi: 10.1016/0195-6701(88)90131-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Churcher G. M. A screening test for the detection of methicillin-resistant staphylococci. J Clin Pathol. 1968 Mar;21(2):213–217. doi: 10.1136/jcp.21.2.213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Coudron P. E., Jones D. L., Dalton H. P., Archer G. L. Evaluation of laboratory tests for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis. J Clin Microbiol. 1986 Nov;24(5):764–769. doi: 10.1128/jcm.24.5.764-769.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. French G. L., Ling J. L., Hui Y. W., Oo H. K. Determination of methicillin-resistance in Staphylococcus aureus by agar dilution and disc diffusion methods. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1987 Oct;20(4):599–608. doi: 10.1093/jac/20.4.599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hamilton-Miller J. M., Iliffe A. Antimicrobial resistance in coagulase-negative staphylococci. J Med Microbiol. 1985 Apr;19(2):217–226. doi: 10.1099/00222615-19-2-217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hedin G., Hambraeus A. Screening tests for the detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus epidermidis. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1991 Nov;28(5):681–694. doi: 10.1093/jac/28.5.681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hewitt J. H., Coe A. W., Parker M. T. The detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. J Med Microbiol. 1969 Nov 4;2(4):443–456. doi: 10.1099/00222615-2-4-443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Jolly J., Goldberg M. Methicillin resistance in staphylococci: an evaluation of conditions for detection. Med Lab Sci. 1989 Jan;46(1):2–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Libert J. M., Colas des Francs D. Sensibilité aux céphalosporines de staphylocoques coagulase négatifs méticilline résistants. Etude in vitro selon différentes méthodologies. Pathol Biol (Paris) 1985 Oct;33(8):831–835. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. McAllister T. A., Mocan H., Murphy A. V., Beattie T. J. Antibiotic susceptibility of staphylococci from CAPD peritonitis in children. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1987 Jan;19(1):95–100. doi: 10.1093/jac/19.1.95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Milne L. M., Curtis G. D., Crow M., Kraak W. A., Selkon J. B. Comparison of culture media for detecting methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase negative staphylococci. J Clin Pathol. 1987 Oct;40(10):1178–1181. doi: 10.1136/jcp.40.10.1178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Mouton R. P., Mulders S. L., de Knijff J., Hermans J. Comparison of test systems for recognition of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1989 Nov;8(11):968–973. doi: 10.1007/BF01967567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Richardson J. F., Marples R. R. Differences in antibiotic susceptibility between Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus saprophyticus. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1980 Jul;6(4):499–510. doi: 10.1093/jac/6.4.499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. SUTHERLAND R., ROLINSON G. N. CHARACTERISTICS OF METHICILLIN-RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCI. J Bacteriol. 1964 Apr;87:887–899. doi: 10.1128/jb.87.4.887-899.1964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Pathology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES