Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Pathology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Pathology
. 1994 Mar;47(3):278–279. doi: 10.1136/jcp.47.3.278

Cytological changes preceding cervical cancer.

J H Robertson 1, B Woodend 1, H Elliott 1
PMCID: PMC501914  PMID: 8093150

Abstract

Cervical smears were reviewed from 62 women who developed squamous carcinoma of the cervix up to 18 years later. The findings indicate that the prevention of cervical cancer by screening depends very largely on the detection of severe dyskaryosis. In this series there was no evidence that mild dyskaryosis was a forerunner of invasive disease. Cytology during the evolution of squamous carcinoma is not characterised by a dyskaryosis which progressively increases in severity. Instead the findings support new concepts that cervical cancer generally arises from an aggressive CIN 3 lesion widely present in the cervix, and in our series, established years before invasion occurs. It would be more useful to report cytology as showing either a low or high grade abnormality rather than distinguishing between different degrees of dyskaryosis.

Full text

PDF
278

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Jarmulowicz M. R., Jenkins D., Barton S. E., Goodall A. L., Hollingworth A., Singer A. Cytological status and lesion size: a further dimension in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1989 Sep;96(9):1061–1066. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1989.tb03381.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Paterson M. E., Peel K. R., Joslin C. A. Cervical smear histories of 500 women with invasive cervical cancer in Yorkshire. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1984 Oct 6;289(6449):896–898. doi: 10.1136/bmj.289.6449.896. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Richart R. M., Wright T. C., Jr Controversies in the management of low-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Cancer. 1993 Feb 15;71(4 Suppl):1413–1421. doi: 10.1002/cncr.2820710406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Stanbridge C.M., Suleman B.A., Persad R.V., El-Khatib S. A cervical smear review in women developing cervical carcinoma with particular reference to age, false negative cytology and the histologic type of the carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 1992 Mar;2(2):92–100. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1438.1992.02020092.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Tidbury P., Singer A., Jenkins D. CIN 3: the role of lesion size in invasion. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1992 Jul;99(7):583–586. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1992.tb13825.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Pathology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES