Abstract
The detection of faecal cytotoxicity using tissue culture was compared with three commercial Clostridium difficile enzyme immunoassay (EIA) kits; Premier C difficile toxin A (Meridian Diagnostic, Inc.); CD-TOX C difficile toxin A (Porton Cambridge); and Cytoclone A+B EIA (Cambridge Biotech Corporation). Of 160 faecal samples examined by all four methods, 52 (32.5%) were cytotoxic, 44 (27.5%) were positive by Premier, 48 (30%) by CD-TOX EIA, and 50 (31.3%) with Cytoclone. When compared with detection of cytotoxicity by tissue culture assay, the following performance indices were obtained: Premier, sensitivity 84.1%, specificity 99.1%, positive predictive value (PPV) 97.8%, negative predictive value (NPV) 93%; CD-TOX, sensitivity 92.3%, specificity 88.0%, PPV 78.7%, NPV 95.9%; Cytoclone, sensitivity 96.2%, specificity 93.5%, PPV 87.7%, NPV 98.1%. EIA results were available within three hours, whereas the results of the cytotoxin assay were available after 24-48 hours. All three kits provided satisfactory results and, although relatively expensive, all could be used in the laboratory effectively to screen for diarrhoeal disease associated with C difficile.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Borriello S. P., Vale T., Brazier J. S., Hyde S., Chippeck E. Evaluation of a commercial enzyme immunoassay kit for the detection of Clostridium difficile toxin A. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1992 Apr;11(4):360–363. doi: 10.1007/BF01962079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bowman R. A., Riley T. V. Laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1988 Aug;7(4):476–484. doi: 10.1007/BF01962596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- De Girolami P. C., Hanff P. A., Eichelberger K., Longhi L., Teresa H., Pratt J., Cheng A., Letourneau J. M., Thorne G. M. Multicenter evaluation of a new enzyme immunoassay for detection of Clostridium difficile enterotoxin A. J Clin Microbiol. 1992 May;30(5):1085–1088. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.5.1085-1088.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Delmée M., Mackey T., Hamitou A. Evaluation of a new commercial Clostridium difficile toxin A enzyme immunoassay using diarrhoeal stools. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1992 Mar;11(3):246–249. doi: 10.1007/BF02098089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- DiPersio J. R., Varga F. J., Conwell D. L., Kraft J. A., Kozak K. J., Willis D. H. Development of a rapid enzyme immunoassay for Clostridium difficile toxin A and its use in the diagnosis of C. difficile-associated disease. J Clin Microbiol. 1991 Dec;29(12):2724–2730. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.12.2724-2730.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Doern G. V., Coughlin R. T., Wu L. Laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated gastrointestinal disease: comparison of a monoclonal antibody enzyme immunoassay for toxins A and B with a monoclonal antibody enzyme immunoassay for toxin A only and two cytotoxicity assays. J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Aug;30(8):2042–2046. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.8.2042-2046.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Knoop F. C., Owens M., Crocker I. C. Clostridium difficile: clinical disease and diagnosis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1993 Jul;6(3):251–265. doi: 10.1128/cmr.6.3.251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lyerly D. M., Krivan H. C., Wilkins T. D. Clostridium difficile: its disease and toxins. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1988 Jan;1(1):1–18. doi: 10.1128/cmr.1.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]