Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2016 Sep 15;6:33540. doi: 10.1038/srep33540

Tectonic and climatic impacts on the biota within the Red River Fault, evidence from phylogeography of Cycas dolichophylla (Cycadaceae)

Ying Zheng 1,2, Jian Liu 1,2, Xun Gong 1,a
PMCID: PMC5024324  PMID: 27629063

Abstract

Dramatic crustal deformation and river incision in Southwest China induced by the Indo-Asian collision have long been argued to contribute to the complicated landscapes, heterogeneous environment and abundant biodiversity in this region. However, biological impacts in promoting intraspecific phylogeographical subdivision and divergence along the Red River Fault zone (RRF) remain poorly understood. To investigate the possible biological effects of tectonic movements and environment variations within the RRF, the phylogeography of Cycas dolichophylla-an endemic but widely distributed Cycas in Southwest China and North Vietnam along the RRF were carried out based on four chloroplast DNA intergenic spacers (cpDNA), three nuclear DNA sequences (nDNA) and 16 simple sequence repeat variations (SSR). Two different phylogeographical patterns were detected: a Southwest-Northeast break across the RRF disclosed by chlorotypes and a China-Vietnam separation revealed by SSR. A Bayesian skyline plot from cpDNA data demonstrated a historical increasing, but a recent declining, dynamic in population size during the Pleistocene. Consequently, we infer it is the local environmental variation during Cenozoic that contributed to the complex landscape and microclimate mosaics, facilitating speciation and divergence of C. dolichophylla. Subsequently, the Quaternary climatic fluctuations coupled with human activities profoundly influenced the genetic structure and demographic history of this species.


In recent years, accumulating evidence from tectonics, paleontology and climate simulations increasingly supported a view that the main body of the Tibetan Plateau (TP) reached its current height (4–5 km) since the mid-Eocene1,2,3,4, that is, the uplift of TP and the evolution of Asian monsoon systems contribute little to the speciation and diversification in Southwest China1,2,3,4,5. Contrarily, it might be the local ecological habitat diversity that resulted in the numerous young plant and animal clades endemic to such a biodiversity hotspot1,6. The Red River Fault zone (RRF), defined by Indochina in the southwestern and South China in the northeastern, is proposed to be the reactive product of India-Asia collision7. It has been argued experiencing left-lateral strike-slip in the first 30–16 Ma8 of collision, yielding at least 15 km of displacement9 and presently right-lateral motion since the late Neogene (8–7 Ma)10 with lower slip rate11,12. However, the emergence of extant Cycas worldwide is supposed to be not much older than ~8 Ma13, the displacement generated by strike-slip stress may have had minimal influence on the speciation of this lineage. Reconstruction of the palaeo-Red River indicated a river incision of nearly 1400 m14, shaping a bulk of the landscape mosaic, which might serve as buffers or shelters for species to survive. Moreover, climatic oscillations during the Quaternary have exerted significant influences on casting genetic diversity and historical dynamics of animals and plants in Southeast China by altering species distributions15. Thus, it might be the regional variation of climate, environment as well as microclimate establishment, that acted as major thrust for modifying and influencing genetic discontinuities, speciation, and diversification of organisms16,17,18,19. However, details of spatiotemporal evolution and biological effects of the RRF in promoting intraspecific phylogeographical subdivision and biotic diversification still remains poorly understood.

Cycas dolichophylla K. D. Hill, T. H. Nguyen & K. L. Phan is an ideal species for inferring the potential biological/biogeographical model within the RRF. On one hand, the distribution of this organism is restricted to the Red River drainage region (Fig. 1) with poor water dispersal capability (no spongy layer inside its seed)20. On the other hand, it belongs to the oldest and most primitive groups of the extant seed plants, which originated before the mid-Permian, reached diversity peak in the Jurassic-Cretaceous with ranges far across the Northeast China21, and underwent massive historical extinction and a recent synchronous global re-diversification during the late Miocene13. Hence, considering the historical geological and paleo-climatic evidence along with the present distribution pattern of C. dolichophylla between China and Vietnam along the RRF, we tried to test if the temporal divergence of intraspecific phylogroups would be connected with effects of geological and climatological events. Alternatively, it also remains to be clarified whether the geological data reviewed above accords with lineage divergence time derived from molecular dating of C. dolichophylla.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Sampling sites and geographical distributions of chlorotypes (a) and nuclotypes ((b) GTP; (c) PHYP; (d) PPRC) identified in the 13 populations of C. dolichophylla along the RRF, with networks of each haplotype displayed on the upper right corner. The sizes of the circles in the networks are proportional to the observed frequencies of the haplotypes and numbers above the lines mean the mutational steps. The black dots are the missing haplotypes. The red curve represents the Red River, separating this species into two lineages: the pink shadow area comprises populations from southwestern clade and the light blue area occupied by northeastern clade. The blue straight line in Fig. 1a stands for the modified ‘Tanaka line’. Maps were drawn using the software ArcGIS version 10.2 (http://desktop.arcgis.com) and modified using Photoshop (Adobe Corporation, California, America).

Here, a phylogeographical study of C. dolichophylla was conducted by tracing variations from four chloroplast intergenic spacers (cpDNA), three nuclear sequences (nDNA) and 16 simple sequence repeats (SSR) in 13 populations across its entire range with an attempt to test the following hypotheses: (i) local environmental variation in its habitats influenced the lineage divergence of C. dolichophylla; (ii) climate variations, especially the glacial-interglacial cycles during the Quaternary re-sculptured this species’ genetic structure and accelerated its diversification.

Results

Phylogeographical patterns

After alignment, a conjoined cpDNA matrix was acquired with 3687 bp in length, identifying 72 polymorphism loci in 27 haplotypes (Table 1). Among these chlorotypes, 11 (C1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 22–27) occurred in the southwest populations of the RRF (BN, CP, JM, XL and TH), whereas the other 16 were endemic to the northeastern populations of the RRF (BX, DV, HS, MG, MLP, NH, NHC and PB) (Fig. 1a). The maximum clade credibility tree generated by BEAST uncovered the crown age of C. dolichophylla to be 1.94 Ma (95% HPD: 1.30–2.62 Ma) and retrieved the ‘northeastern’ and ‘southwestern’ chlorotypes as reciprocally monophyletic lineages, with coalescence time dated to about 1.84 Ma (95% HPD: 1.22–2.51 Ma) (Fig. 2). AMOVA revealed that most variations occurred among populations (83.68%) with only 16.32% existed within populations, which in accordance with results of northeast and southwest populations (Table 2). The high value of Fst (Fst > 0.25) suggested significant genetic differentiation among populations based on Wright’s22 assumption. However, gene flow detected by cpDNA data implied that genetic exchanges between chlorotypes were quite low (Nm < 1) (Table 2).

Table 1. Composition of haplotypes, haplotype diversity (Hd) and nucleotide diversity (Pi) inferred from combined cpDNA sequences and nDNA sequences of C. dolichophylla investigated in this study.

Code cpDNA
GTP
PHYP
PPRC
Haplotypes (No.) Hd Pi × 103 Haplotypes (No.) Hd Pi × 103 Haplotypes (No.) Hd Pi × 103 Haplotypes (No.) Hd Pi × 103
BN C1(9)C2(1) 0.200 0.160 G1(20) 0.000 0.000 P1(20) 0.000 0.000 R1(18)R2(2) 0.189 0.260
BX C3(3)C4(2)C5(1)C6(3)C7(1) 0.844 1.900 G2(16)G3(2)G4(2) 0.358 2.090 P2(13)P3(5)P4(1)P5(1) 0.537 1.370 R3(17)R4(2) R5(1) 0.279 1.550
CP C8(3) C9(7) 0.467 1.140 G2(4)G5(9)G6(7) 0.668 2.010 P1(1)P2(9) P6(1)P7(2)P8(7) 0.695 1.880 R6(1)R7(3)R8(2)R9(7)R10(7) 0.758 3.560
DV C10(4)C11(5) C12(1) 0.644 0.420 G2(14)G5(3)G7(2) G8(1) 0.500 2.550 P2(9)P3(3)P5(7)P7(1) 0.684 4.440 R3(18)R4(2) 0.189 1.050
HS C13(8) C14(2) 0.356 1.260 G2(16) G7(4) 0.337 2.350 P1(1)P2(11)P3(8) 0.563 0.750 R3(20) 0.000 0.000
JM C15(10) 0.000 0.000 G2(11)G7(4)G9(5) 0.626 4.320 P2(12) P9(8) 0.505 0.530 R3(20) 0.000 0.000
MG C16(9) C17(1) 0.200 0.380 G1(2)G2(18) 0.189 1.980 P1(1)P2(11)P3(8) 0.563 0.750 R3(18)R4(2) 0.189 1.050
MLP C18(10) 0.000 0.000 G2(1)G3(5)G5(1)G10(13) 0.537 1.870 P10(10)P11(4)P12(2)P13(1)P14(1)P15(1)P16(1) 0.663 2.380 R3(10)R9(10) 0.526 2.920
NH C19(9) C20(1) 0.000 0.000 G2(12)G5(8) 0.505 1.760 P2(8)P3(10)P4(1)P5(1) 0.616 1.510 R3(18)R4(2) 0.189 1.050
NHC C11(10) 0.000 0.000 G2(17)G5(1) G8(2) 0.279 1.600 P2(10)P3(7)P4(1)P5(2) 0.647 2.210 R3(16)R11(4) 0.337 0.470
PB C21(10) 0.000 0.000 G11(20) 0.000 0.000 P17(20) 0.000 0.000 R920) 0.000 0.000
TH C22(3)C23(6) C24(1) 0.467 0.250 G2(14)G5(4) G7(1)G12(1) 0.489 2.070 P7(13)P18(6)P19(1) 0.511 1.080 R3(2)R7(16)R8(1) R9(1) 0.363 1.560
XL C25(5)C26(4) C27(1) 0.644 0.670 G2(13)G5(5) G7(1)G12(1) 0.537 2.240 P1(1)P2(1)P7(9)P18(1)P20(3)P21(4)P22(1) 0.763 2.600 R3(8)R6(1)R7(5)R8(3)R9(3) 0.768 4.020
Total   0.940 2.510   0.677 3.840   0.809 2.900   0.642 3.160

Hd: haplotype diversity; Pi: nucleotide diversity.

Figure 2. BEAST-generated maximum clade credibility tree of chlorotypes from 13 C. dolichophylla populations, with C. edentata and C. rumphii set as outgroups.

Figure 2

The topologies derived from Bayesian Inference and Maximum Parsimony accord with BEAST trees, except for minor incongruences at nodes with low confidence level. Numbers above the branches indicate posterior probabilities (left) and bootstrap values (right) from the Maximum Parsimony principle (>50 are shown). Numbers below branches denote the divergence times with 95% HPD.

Table 2. Results of analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) of the concatenated cpDNA sequences, chloroplast sequences from northeast and southwest populations of the RRF, as well as nDNA sequences in all populations of C. dolichophylla.

Markers Source of variation d.f. Sum of squares Variance components Percentage of variation (%) Fst Nm
cpDNA Among populations 12 676.16 5.53 83.68 0.84 0.05
  Within populations 117 126.10 1.08 16.32    
Northeast Among populations 6 242.54 3.91 74.59 0.75 0.08
  Within populations 63 83.90 1.33 25.41    
Southwest Among populations 5 182.87 3.58 82.08 0.82 0.05
  Within populations 54 42.20 0.78 17.92    
GTP Among populations 12 167.90 0.67 55.08 0.55 0.20
  Within populations 247 135.40 0.55 44.92    
PHYP Among populations 12 213.93 0.85 50.90 0.51 0.24
  Within populations 247 202.65 0.82 49.10    
PPRC Among populations 12 174.91 0.70 59.24 0.59 0.17
  Within populations 247 119.75 0.48 40.76    

D.f.: degrees of freedom; FST: the fixation index; Nm: gene flows.

The aligned length of three nuclear genes, GTP, PHYP and PPRC, were 573–574 bp, 940–946 bp as well as 720 bp, respectively. For GTP, 14 polymorphism loci were identified with 12 haplotypes confirmed (Table 1). Haplotype 1, 7, 8, 9 (G1, 7–9) clustered together, while the others formed another lineage with the divergence time closing to 0.64 Ma (95% HPD: 0.25–1.09 Ma) (Fig. 1b; Supplementary Fig. S1a). G2 was the most common haplotype, occurring in 11 of the 13 populations, with its geographic distribution range covering both southwestern and northeastern of the RRF. Nevertheless, although it was not a widely shared haplotype, G5 occupied an interior (ancestral) rather than tip (derived) position in the network with the derived haplotypes showed a satellite-like distribution (Fig. 1b). All of the individuals sampling from PB were restricted to a private haplotype (G11), whereas the BN population was fixed by G1 with one MG sample included (MG-9). As for PHYP, 22 haplotypes were defined based on 26 polymorphism loci (Table 1). These haplotypes were further grouped together in two clades, namely, P5 and P17 formed one clade and the other 20 haplotypes shaped another one where four mutational steps were taken for this separation (Fig. 1c). The timing of most recent common ancestors of these two lineages was estimated to 0.58 Ma (95% HPD: 0.28–0.92 Ma) (Supplementary Fig. S1b). Similar to the results of GTP, population PB still occupied a private haplotype (P17) and BN was restricted to P1 although this haplotype was shared by CP, HS, MG and XL (Table 1). Interestingly, the population of MLP defined seven distinct haplotypes (P10–16) by a unique 34 bp or 68 bp deletion accompanied by several mutations. The most widely shared haplotype, P2, was in the interior position of the network with nine populations embraced and the other haplotypes formed a star-like structure including two small ‘loops’ (Fig. 1c). Eleven haplotypes were identified on the base of 11 polymorphism loci of PPRC. Two lineages were also confirmed by the maximum clade credibility tree with divergence time approaching to 0.53 Ma (95% HPD: 0.21–0.87 Ma) (Supplementary Fig. S1c). However, relationships inferred from Network remained ambiguous because of the presence of multiple closed ‘loops’ (Fig. 1d). Apart from BN, CP and PB, haplotype 3 (R3) swept all of the remaining populations occurring in either southwest or northeast of the RRF. No matter in MP-derived strict consensus trees or the maximum clade credibility trees inferred by BEAST, all the combined cpDNA and three nDNA sequences suggested the monophyly of C. dolichophylla with fine support (MP bootstrap for cpDNA: 100%; GTP: 86%; PHYP: 86%; PPRC: 86%) (Fig. 2; Supplementary Fig. S1a–c).

As for SSR data, a total of 217 alleles were identified by 16 microsatellite loci in 255 individuals from 13 populations (Supplementary Tables S1 and S2). Results of Bayesian clustering inference (Supplementary Fig. S1e,f) indicated that the most likely number of clusters was 2 for all the C. dolichophylla populations when the ΔK statistics were applied. When considering the second fittest number of grouping, which suggested as K = 3, it was almost similar to the case in K = 2 with only minor subdivision. Additionally, all the structure analysis derived from UPGMA and PCo (Supplementary Fig. S1d,h) supported for two grouping division. The BARRIER analysis (Supplementary Fig. S1g) showed that there was only one major genetic boundary with a 58% mean bootstrap value, separating BN from the remnant twelve populations. Therefore, two lineage clusters corresponding to cluster I and cluster II in UPGMA were applied in this study.

The AMOVA analysis (Table 2) reflected that there were nearly parallel contributions on molecular variations both among and within populations derived from PHYP (50.90% vs 49.10%), GTP (55.08% vs 44.92%) and PPRC (59.24% vs 40.76%). However, 74.3% of genetic variations within populations and 25.7% among populations were detected from SSR data. The fixation indexes calculated by these three nuclear genes as well as SSRs were all greater than threshold 0.25, indicating significant genetic variation between populations. The gene flows inferred from nuclear genes were lower than the critical value 1 (Table 2). However, results of analysis of gene flows between each pair of the 13 populations in C. dolichophylla based on SSR data (Supplementary Table S3) were disparate with cpDNA and nDNA, which exhibited that XL and BX exchanged genetic materials more frequently with other populations no matter from South Yunnan or Vietnam than others. Moreover, the highest level of gene flow was detected between DV and NH whose geographic distance was considered to be the closest among these populations.

Population genetic diversity and structure

For the cpDNA data, the average within-population diversity (HS = 0.320) was much lower than the total diversity (HT = 0.994), and both NST (0.834) and GST (0.678) were high (Table 3). U-test showed that NST was significantly larger than GST, indicating a phylogeographical structure of chlorotype distribution. Moreover, the genetic diversity detected in northeast and southwest populations were similar (HS = 0.321 vs. 0.319; HT = 0.976 vs. 1.000), which was different from estimating of population subdivision (NST = 0.740 vs. 0.823; GST = 0.672 vs. 0.681), that was, significant phylogeographical structure was detected in southwest (P = 0.018) but not in northeast (P = 0.051). In accordance with results of phylogeographical structure inference, Mantel test uncovered a significant pattern of IBD for cpDNA at the range-wide scale (r = 0.281, P < 0.05) (Supplementary Fig. S2) and in southwest, but not the case in northeast.

Table 3. Genetic diversity and differentiation parameters (mean ± SE in parentheses) for the jointed cpDNA matrix, chloroplast sequences from northeast and southwest populations of the RRF, as well as nDNA sequences in all populations of C. dolichophylla.

Markers HS HT NST GST U test
cpDNA 0.320 (0.082) 0.994 (0.014) 0.834 (0.063) 0.678 (0.082) Nst > Gst*significant
Northeast 0.321 (0.121) 0.976 (0.041) 0.740 (0.121) 0.672 (0.125) non-significant
Southwest 0.319 (0.119) 1.000 (0.036) 0.823 (0.099) 0.681 (0.119) significant
GTP 0.387 (0.061) 0.719 (0.084) 0.551 (0.144) 0.463 (0.121) non-significant
PHYP 0.524 (0.068) 0.869 (0.045) 0.509 (0.118) 0.397 (0.099) non-significant
PPRC 0.291 (0.072) 0.670 (0.106) 0.592 (0.094) 0.565 (0.102) non-significant

Hs: the mean genetic diversity within populations; HT: total genetic diversity for species; GST and NST: coefficient of population differentiation.

*: P < 0.05, significant difference.

The genetic diversities (Table 3) were much higher in PHYP (HS = 0.524; HT = 0.869) than in GTP (HS = 0.387; HT = 0.719) or PPRC (HS = 0.291; HT = 0.670). Consequently, both the NST and GST estimated by PHYP were lower than the other two genes. However, no significant difference between NST and GST was detected on these three gene fragments. In other words, no significant effect of IBD was detected, as the correlation between genetic distance and geographic distance was not significant (P > 0.05).

Historical demography based on DNA sequence and SSR variation

The cpDNA sequence mismatch analysis results (Supplementary Fig. S3a) for all the C. dolichophylla populations as well as northeastern and southwestern groups displayed a multimodal distribution pattern with non-significant SSD statistic and HRag value under a sudden demographic expansion model, except for the significant SSD value detected at the whole chlorotypes level. Similarly, positive values of Fu and Li’s D*, Fu and Li’s F*, Fu’s Fs rejected the sudden expansion model (Supplementary Table S4). For nDNA, multimodal or bimodal distributions were detected with the appearance of non-significant SSD and HRag (Supplementary Fig. S3b–d). The results of neutrality test and Fu’s Fs for GTP and PPRC were similar, with positive but not significant values acquired. Nevertheless, the case for PHYP was discrepant: all the SSD statistic and HRag value were non-significant, along with negative results of neutrality test and Fu’s Fs (except for Fu and Li’s D*) (Supplementary Table S4).

Historical demography inferred by Bayesian skyline plot based on a jointed cpDNA matrix uncovered two dynamic events: during about 0.57–0.70 Ma, C. dolichophylla experienced population expansion (Fig. 3a). However, it began to contract in effective population size at approximately 0.10 Ma with a rapid decline rate detected during about 70 Ka. Population demographic histories deduced from nDNA revealed that C. dolichophylla have experienced population size contraction mainly during the late Pleistocene to Holocene (Fig. 3b–d).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Bayesian skyline plots based on cpDNA (a) and nDNA ((b) GTP; (c) PHYP; (d) PPRC) for the effective population size fluctuation throughout time. The gray areas indicate the last stage of the last glacial period (32–12 ka).

For both the Sign and Wilcoxon tests (Supplementary Table S5), no significant heterozygosity excess was detected under the S.M.M assumption. However, on the postulation of a more conservative and powerful model (T.P.M), Sign test revealed significant excess of heterozygosity in PB. As for the Wilcoxon test, it seemed to indicate that BN and CP have experienced significant heterozygosity excess, while NHC and PB suffered the most significant excess of heterozygosity, all of which implied a departure from mutation-drift equilibrium23. Moreover, a normal L-shaped mode-shift distribution was forecasted in each of the population. All the G-W indices did not exceed the threshold level of 0.68 (Supplementary Table S5).

Discussion

A major finding of the present study was that C. dolichophylla comprised two geographically distinct lineages as inferred from the chlorotype network analysis, namely a southwestern clade distributed to the southwest of the RRF (including PB) and a northeastern clade occupying the northeast region (Fig. 1a). This genealogical split was geographically largely consistent with one phytogeographical boundary, ‘Tanaka Line (TKL)’24, except for two southwestern-clade chlorotypes, C17 and C21, that occurred in the northeast of RRF. These two chlorotypes escaping from southwest lineage was best explained by the local adaptation to novel selective pressures during the species’ range expansion into geographically and ecologically different environments. However, the missing of ten interior haplotypes was mainly due to the species’ long evolutionary history during historical climate oscillations, geological as well as recent human activities25,26.

The network of nuclear haplotypes, no matter in GTP, PHYP or PPRC, all failed to register a prominent genealogical break across the RRF although several exclusive haplotypes were discovered in southwestern and northeastern clades, respectively (Fig. 1b,c). Phylogenetic relationships of nucleotypes inferred from BEAST trees remained confusion (Supplementary Fig. S1a–c). Such phylogenetic ambiguity could be explained by the widely shared nucleotypes between southwestern and northeastern populations (e.g. G2, P2 and R3), which may to the retention of ancestral polymorphisms27. Interestingly, the results of SSR data (UPGMA and Bayesian clustering inference) revealed another distinct scene (Supplementary Fig. S1d,f): C. dolichophylla was split into two groups divided by national boundary, a Chinese group with populations from BN, JM, MLP and PB and a Vietnam group with the populations from northern Vietnam, as well as two Chinese populations, HS and MG. The explanation for two Chinese populations nested in Vietnam lineage might be the closer geographical distance to Vietnam, accompanied with the influence of southern drained Red River system as well as the frequent human activities, such as commercial trades and the introduction of exotic populations. The observation of much stronger phylogeographical division across the RRF in cpDNA as opposed to nDNA and SSR is associated with the different inheritance modes and evolutionary rates between nuclear and organelle genomes28.

The discovery of two distinct groups with cpDNA data was not unexpected, given the complex topography and heterogeneous environmental conditions in Southwest China, especially along the RRF. However, for a newly radiated species, the local habitat differences in the immense region with varying altitudes, soils, slopes as well as ecological selection from pollinators and seed transporters, seemed more promising factors to explain the diversification of C. dolichophylla than geological uplift. On one hand, the re-diversification of Cycas mainly happened in the late Miocene13,29 and the divergent time derived from chlorotypes of C. dolichophylla was during the early Pleistocene (1.94 Ma). On the other hand, most of the tectonic process in Southwest China happened during or even before the Miocene, such as uplift, crustal thickening, strike-slip and river incision1,2,3,4,11. Therefore, we proposed that it is the heterogeneous topography along the Red River region that acted as physical barriers to restrict gene flow between cycads, with global climate changes30 resulted in the diversification of Cycas species in this region. Subsequently, the local environmental variation contributed to the formation of microclimate pockets31, providing suitable and stable environment for species to survive through hostile climate fluctuation and accumulate genetic variations that gave rise to the speciation of C. dolichophylla, as well as the subsequent differentiation of the Southeastern and Northwestern subclades32. However, the fluctuation of Quaternary climate also made particular impacts on the population dynamics of this newly formed species, which was evident from our BSP inferences and neutrality tests (Fig. 3; Supplementary Table S4).

During the largest Naynayxungla Glaciation (0.72–0.50 Ma) when valley glaciers dominated33, it was difficult for this cliff species to flourish, but underwent range contraction, limiting intraspecific gene flows and further diversification of nDNA lineages. The subsequent interglacial period provided opportunity for C. dolichophylla to undergo spatial expansion and population growth. Nonetheless, with the persistence of cold conditions until the late Ionian Stage (0.3–0.13 Ma) together with the onset of Riss glacial cycle, the enlarged C. dolichophylla populations began to shrink. Moreover, during the last stage of the last glacial period (32–12 ka), cold and arid climatic conditions established, accompanied by a strengthened Asian winter monsoon dominating over continental Southeast Asia34. Being adapted to warm and moist conditions, such abnormal climate variations restricted C. dolichophylla to scattered habitats and thus hindered gene flow between populations. Although the Bottleneck analysis based on SSR data failed to register any recent bottleneck event on this species, the small G-W indices implied a historical bottleneck, which coincided with the demography history (Supplementary Table S5). Concurrently, genetic drift probably played a key role in differentiation, regarding the small historical population size of C. dolichophylla estimated by LDNe (Supplementary Table S6).

In conclusion, our results together with evidence from previous researches jointly support the perspective that it is the climate changes and environmental heterogeneity (pockets of microclimate) that gradually cast the evolutionary history of C. dolichophylla. That is, tectonic activities, river incision as well as the reinforcement of Asian monsoon systems didn’t work directly on speciation, but local habitat differences coupled with ecological selection from pollinators and seed transporters gave birth to the speciation of C. dolichophylla. Whereas the alternation of glacial and interglacial periods from the mid-Pleistocene onwards played critical roles in shaping this species’ population structures and demographic history.

Methods

Population sampling

A total of 255 foliage samples from 13 populations of C. dolichophylla in RRF were collected, which covered almost the entire range of this species (Fig. 1; Supplementary Table S7). Each population was represented by 11–28 individuals. Fresh leaves were dried in silica gel immediately after collection for DNA extraction. Ten individuals per population were randomly selected for chloroplast and nuclear DNA sequencing, with C. edentata and C. rumphii being employed as outgroups. All of the 255 individuals were used for the microsatellite study.

DNA extraction, amplification and sequencing

Genomic DNA was extracted from the silica-dried leaves by modified CTAB method35. Four cpDNA intergenic spacers, atpH-atpI36, psbM-trnD36, trnL-trnF37 and trnS-trnG36, as well as three single-copy nDNA genes, GTP-binding protein Era (GTP)38, phytochrome P (PHYP) and hypothetical protein (PPRC) (Chiang, Y. C. unpublished data), were selected for subsequent PCR amplifications analysis. Microsatellite markers were selected from recently developed 65 nuclear microsatellites in Cycas39,40,41,42,43,44,45, in which 16 polymorphic microsatellite loci were chosen for genotyping. All the sequencing processes were operated by ABI 3730 automated sequencers at Shanghai Majorbio Bio-pharm Technology Co., Ltd. Sequences used in this study are available from GenBank with the accession numbers: KT824880-KT824883, KT824886-KT824889, KT901304-KT901411.

Data analysis of DNA sequences

Prior to conducting all analyses, congruence test was generated by PAUP* 4.0 b1046 for the four cpDNA sequences. Although the result suggested indistinctive degree of homogeneity between those fragments (P < 0.5), a combined cpDNA matrix was still applied for the following analyses under previous suggestions47, whereas the three nDNA sequences were analysed separately. Genetic diversity indices were calculated by DnaSP, version 5.048. Permut v.1.0 was used to calculate the mean genetic diversity within populations (Hs), total genetic diversity for species (HT) and coefficient of population differentiation (GST, NST)49. Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA)50 was conducted to partition genetic variation among and within populations. All of those analyses were performed with Arlequin version 3.151. To uncover the reticulate evolutionary relationships between haplotypes, networks of chlorotypes and nuclotypes were constructed on Network, version 4.2.0.152. Large fragment of indels were treated as a single mutation. Phylogenetic relationships among haplotypes were inferred based on Maximum Parsimony (MP) and Bayesian Inference (BI) methods with C. edentata and C. rumphii served as outgroups. For the MP trees, multi-trees heuristic search and tree bisection-reconnection branch swapping were adopted with 1000 repeats bootstrap analysis performing on PAUP. For BI tree search, the Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) runs started from independent random trees and extended for 1.0 × 107 generations, were repeated twice with trees sampled every 1000 generations implemented in MrBayes 3.1.253.

Divergence times among haplotypes were estimated under a Bayesian framework in BEAST 1.6.154 with HKY + G and HKY applied as the most suitable nucleotide models for joint cpDNA and three nDNA fragments, respectively. Since there was no well-documented evolutionary rate available for Cycas, previously estimated rates for seed plants, 1.01 × 10−9 and 5.1–7.1 × 10−9 substitutions per site per year for synonymous sites (s/s/y) for cpDNA and nDNA, respectively, were adopted in this analysis55. MCMC chains were run for 1.0 × 107 generations, sampling once every 1000 generations. All the above parameters were performed by BEAUti 1.6.1 in the BEAST package. TreeAnnotator 1.6.1 was used to create a maximum clade credibility tree with the first 10% trees discarded as burn-in56. Pairwise mismatch distribution and neutrality tests57,58,59 were operated in DnaSP. Historical demography of C. dolichophylla was inferred from Bayesian skyline plots, which were generated by BEAST. Maps were drawn using the software ArcGIS version 10.2 (http://desktop.arcgis.com).

Data analysis of SSR data

The indices of genetic diversity and genetic differentiation were calculated using GenAlEx version 6.4.160. Gene flow (Nm) between populations were calculated with formula Nm = (1-FST)/4FST61, with the FST acquired from Arlequin. AMOVA analysis was performed on Arlequin. Isolation by distance (IBD) was tested by performing Mantel tests in GenAlEx using a correlation of geographic distance with genetic distance for all pairs of populations. To infer genetic structures of sampled populations and individuals, unweighted pair group mean analysis (UPGMA) were carried out on TEPGA, version 1.362, with 5000 of permutations. Meanwhile, an individual-based principal coordinate analysis (PCO) was visualized by the program MVSP, version 3.1263. A model-based Bayesian clustering method was applied to assign individuals from 13 populations using the STRUCTURE version 2.364. Twenty independent runs were performed for each set, with grouping number (K) ranging from 1 to 20. For each run, a burn-in of 1 × 105 iterations and 1 × 105 subsequent MCMC steps were performed. In addition, the second-order rate of change of the natural logarithm probability of the data with respect to the number of clusters (ΔK) was evaluated to deduce the best fit number of grouping with the online tool STRUCTURE HARVESTER V.0.6.9365. Barrier boundary analysis was carried out to test whether there were genetic borderlines existed between populations based on genetic distance matrices performing on BARRIER version 2.266.

To detect recent bottlenecks caused by reduction in effective population size, the observed gene diversity was compared with the equilibrium gene diversity given the observed number of alleles implementing in BOTTLENECK version 1.2.0267. The Garza-Williamson index (G-W)68 was also estimated for testing early shrink in population size using Arlequin software. Effective population sizes (NE) with the linkage disequilibrium (LD) method implemented in LDNe69 at three levels of lowest allele frequency (0.01, 0.02, 0.05) for a 95% confidence interval were calculated for conservation strategic design.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Zheng, Y. et al. Tectonic and climatic impacts on the biota within the Red River Fault, evidence from phylogeography of Cycas dolichophylla (Cycadaceae). Sci. Rep. 6, 33540; doi: 10.1038/srep33540 (2016).

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Information
srep33540-s1.docx (589.1KB, docx)

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Xiuyan Feng and Yiqing Gong for their assistance with field survey and plant sampling; Yuchung Chiang and Yujuan Zhao for their valuable comments on the manuscript. This work was supported by the United Fund of the NSFC and the Yunnan Natural Science Foundation (U1136602 to X.G.).

Footnotes

Author Contributions Y.Z. performed the research, analysed the data, interpreted the results and wrote the manuscript. J.L. contributed to sampling, interpretation of results and manuscript revision. X.G. conceived of the study, participated in its design and coordination and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

References

  1. Renner S. S. Available data point to a 4-km-high Tibetan Plateau by 40 Ma, but 100 molecular-clock papers have linked supposed recent uplift to young node ages. Journal of Biogeography 12755, 1–9 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  2. Favre A. et al. The role of the uplift of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau for the evolution of Tibetan biotas. Biological Revews 90, 236–253 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Wang C. et al. Outward-growth of the Tibetan Plateau during the Cenozoic: A review. Tectonophysics 621, 1–43 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  4. Li S., Currie B. S., Rowley D. B. & Ingalls M. Cenozoic paleoaltimetry of the SE margin of the Tibetan Plateau: Constraints on the tectonic evolution of the region. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 432, 415–424 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  5. Liu X. & Dong B. Influence of the Tibetan Plateau uplift on the Asian monsoon-arid environment evolution. Chinese Science Bulletin 58, 4277–4291 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  6. López-Pujol J., Zhang F. M., Sun H. Q., Ying T. S. & Ge S. Centres of plant endemism in China: places for survival or for speciation? Journal of Biogeography 38, 1267–1280 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  7. Searle M. Role of the Red River Shear zone, Yunnan and Vietnam, in the continental extrusion of SE Asia. Journal of the Geological Society 163, 1025–1036 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  8. Tapponnier P., Peltzer G., Le Dain A., Armijo R. & Cobbold P. Propagating extrusion tectonics in Asia: new insights from simple experiments with plasticine. Geology 10, 611–616 (1982). [Google Scholar]
  9. Schoenbohm L. M., Burchfiel B. C., Chen L. & Yin J. Miocene to present activity along the Red River fault, China, in the context of continental extrusion, upper-crustal rotation, and lower-crustal flow. Geological Society of America Bulletin 118, 672–688 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  10. Leloup P. H. et al. Structural, petrological and thermal evolution of a Tertiary ductile strike‐slip shear zone, Diancang Shan, Yunnan. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth (1978–2012) 98, 6715–6743 (1993). [Google Scholar]
  11. Schoenbohm L. M., Burchfiel B. C. & Liangzhong C. Propagation of surface uplift, lower crustal flow, and Cenozoic tectonics of the southeast margin of the Tibetan Plateau. Geology 34, 813–816 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  12. Zuchiewicz W. & Cuong N. Q. Quaternary tectonics of the Red River Fault Zone in Vietnam-A morphotectonic approach. Geologia/Akademia Górniczo-Hutnicza im. Stanisława Staszica w Krakowie 35, 367–374 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  13. Nagalingum N. S. et al. Recent synchronous radiation of a living fossil. Science 334, 796–799 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Schoenbohm L. M., Whipple K. X., Burchfiel B. C. & Chen L. Geomorphic constraints on surface uplift, exhumation, and plateau growth in the Red River region, Yunnan Province, China. Geological Society of America Bulletin 116, 895–909 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  15. Qiu Y. X., Fu C. X. & Comes H. P. Plant molecular phylogeography in China and adjacent regions: Tracing the genetic imprints of Quaternary climate and environmental change in the world’s most diverse temperate flora. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 59, 225–244 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Wen J., Zhang J. Q., Nie Z. L., Zhong Y. & Sun H. Evolutionary diversifications of plants on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Frontiers in Genetics 5, 4 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Che J. et al. Spiny frogs (Paini) illuminate the history of the Himalayan region and Southeast Asia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107, 13765–13770 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Li J. T. et al. Diversification of rhacophorid frogs provides evidence for accelerated faunal exchange between India and Eurasia during the Oligocene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110, 3441–3446 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Liu Y. et al. Sino-Himalayan mountains act as cradles of diversity and immigration centres in the diversification of parrotbills (Paradoxornithidae). Journal of Biogeography, 12738, 1–14 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  20. Hill K. D., Stevenson D. W. & Osborne R. The world list of cycads. The Botanical Review 70, 274–298 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  21. Wang Y., Zhang W., Zheng S., Saiki K. c. & Li N. New discovery of fossil cycad-like plants from the Middle Jurassic of west Liaoning, China. Chinese Science Bulletin 50, 1805–1808 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  22. Wright S. Evolution and the Genetics of Populations. (University of Chicago press, Chicago, 1978). [Google Scholar]
  23. Yuan J. H., Cornille A., Giraud T., Cheng F. Y. & Hu Y. H. Independent domestications of cultivated tree peonies from different wild peony species. Molecular Ecology 23, 82–95 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Tanaka T. Species Problem in Citrus. (Japanese Society for the Promotion of Science, Tokyo, 1954). [Google Scholar]
  25. Feng X. Y., Wang Y. H. & Gong X. Genetic diversity, genetic structure and demographic history of Cycas simplicipinna (Cycadaceae) assessed by DNA sequences and SSR markers. BMC Plant Biology 14, 187 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Feng X. F., Zheng Y. & Gong X. Middle-Upper Pleistocene climate changes shaped the divergence and demography of Cycas guizhouensis (Cycadaceae): Evidence from DNA sequences and microsatellite markers. Scientific Reports 6, 27368 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Zhao Y. J. & Gong X. Genetic divergence and phylogeographic history of two closely related species (Leucomeris decora and Nouelia insignis) across the ‘Tanaka Line’ in Southwest China. BMC Evolutionary Biology 15, 134 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Wolfe K. H., Li W. H. & Sharp P. M. Rates of nucleotide substitution vary greatly among plant mitochondrial, chloroplast, and nuclear DNAs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 84, 9054–9058 (1987). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Xiao L. Q. & Moller M. Nuclear ribosomal ITS functional paralogs resolve the phylogenetic relationships of a late-miocene radiation cycad Cycas (Cycadaceae). PloS one 10, e0117971 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Dupont-Nivet G. et al. Tibetan plateau aridification linked to global cooling at the Eocene-Oligocene transition. Nature 445, 635–638 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Hof C., Levinsky I., AraÚJo M. B. & Rahbek C. Rethinking species’ ability to cope with rapid climate change. Global Change Biology 17, 2987–2990 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  32. Bentley J., Verboom G. A. & Bergh N. G. Erosive processes after tectonic uplift stimulate vicariant and adaptive speciation: evolution in an Afrotemperate-endemic paper daisy genus. BMC Evolutionary Biology 14, 27–42 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Zheng B., Xu Q. & Shen Y. The relationship between climate change and Quaternary glacial cycles on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau: review and speculation. Quaternary International 97–98, 93–101 (2002). [Google Scholar]
  34. Cook C. G. & Jones R. T. Palaeoclimate dynamics in continental Southeast Asia over the last ~30,000 Calyrs BP. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 339, 1–11 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  35. Doyle J. [DNA protocols for plants-CTAB total DNA isolation]. Molecular techniques in taxonomy. [Hewitt M. & Johnston A. ed.] (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 1991). [Google Scholar]
  36. Shaw J. et al. The tortoise and the hare II: relative utility of 21 noncoding chloroplast DNA sequences for phylogenetic analysis. American Journal of Botany 92, 142–166 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Taberlet P., Gielly L., Pautou G. & Bouvet J. Universal primers for amplification of three non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA. Plant Molecular Biology 17, 1105–1109 (1991). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Salas-Leiva D. E. et al. Conserved genetic regions across angiosperms as tools to develop single-copy nuclear markers in gymnosperms: an example using cycads. Molecular Ecology Resources 14, 831–845 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Cibrián-Jaramillo A., Marler T. E., DeSalle R. & Brenner E. D. Development of EST-microsatellites from the cycad Cycas rumphii, and their use in the recently endangered Cycas micronesica. Conservation Genetics 9, 1051–1054 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  40. Wang Z. F., Ye W. H., Cao H. L., Li Z. C. & Peng S. L. Identification and characterization of EST-SSRs and cpSSRs in endangered Cycas hainanensis. Conservation Genetics 9, 1079–1081 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  41. Yang Y., Li Y., Li L. F., Ge X. J. & Gong X. Isolation and characterization of microsatellite markers for Cycas debaoensis YC Zhong et CJ Chen (Cycadaceae). Molecular Ecology Resources 8, 913–915 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Li L. et al. Isolation and characterization of microsatellite loci in endangered Cycas changjiangensis (Cycadaceae). Conservation Genetics 10, 793–795 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  43. Zhang M. et al. Isolation and characterization of microsatellite markers for Cycas hainanensis CJ Chen (Cycadaceae). Conservation Genetics 10, 1175–1176 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  44. Zhang F. M. et al. Development of seven novel EST-SSR markers from Cycas panzhihuaensis (Cycadaceae). American Journal of Botany 97, 159–161 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Ju L. P. et al. Microsatellite primers in the native perennial cycad Cycas taitungensis (Cycadaceae). American Journal of Botany 98, e84–e86 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Swofford D. L. PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4. Sinauer Associates: Sunderland (2003). [Google Scholar]
  47. Quicke D. L., Jones O. R. & Epstein D. R. Correcting the problem of false incongruence due to noise imbalance in the incongruence length difference (ILD) test. Systematic Biology 56, 496–503 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Librado P. & Rozas J. DnaSP v5: a software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics 25, 1451–1452 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Pons O. & Petit R. Measwring and testing genetic differentiation with ordered versus unordered alleles. Genetics 144, 1237–1245 (1996). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Excoffier L., Smouse P. E. & Quattro J. M. Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics 131, 479–491 (1992). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Excoffier L., Laval G. & Schneider S. Arlequin (version 3.0): an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evolutionary Bioinformatics Online 1, 47–50 (2005). [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Forster M., Forster P. & Watson J. NETWORK (version 4.2. 0.1): a software for population genetics data analysis. Fluxus Technology Ltd, Clare (2007). [Google Scholar]
  53. Ronquist F. & Huelsenbeck J. P. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19, 1572–1574 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Drummond A. J. & Rambaut A. BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. BMC Evolutionary Biology 7, 214 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Graur D. & Li W. H. Fundamentals of Molecular Evolution. (Sunderland Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, 2000). [Google Scholar]
  56. Drummond A. J., Ho S. Y., Phillips M. J. & Rambaut A. Relaxed phylogenetics and dating with confidence. PLoS Biology 4, 699 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Tajima F. Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics 123, 585–595 (1989). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Fu Y. X. & Li W. H. Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations. Genetics 133, 693–709 (1993). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Fu Y. X. Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations against population growth, hitchhiking and background selection. Genetics 147, 915–925 (1997). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Peakall R. & Smouse P. E. GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Molecular Ecology Notes 6, 288–295 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Wright S. Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 16, 97 (1931). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Miller M. P. Tools for population genetic analyses (TFPGA) 1.3: A Windows program for the analysis of allozyme and molecular population genetic data. Computer software distributed by author 4, 157 (1997). [Google Scholar]
  63. Kovach W. MVSP-A multivariate statistical Package for Windows, ver. 3.1. Kovach Computing Services, Pentraeth, Wales, UK 137 (1999). [Google Scholar]
  64. Evanno G., Regnaut S. & Goudet J. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Molecular Ecology 14, 2611–2620 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Earl D. A. STRUCTURE HARVESTER: a website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conservation Genetics Resources 4, 359–361 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  66. Manni F., Guerard E. & Heyer E. Geographic patterns of (genetic, morphologic, linguistic) variation: how barriers can be detected by using Monmonier’s algorithm. Human Biology 76, 173–190 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Piry S., Luikart G. & Cornuet J. BOTTLENECK: a computer program for detecting recent reductions in the effective size using allele frequency data. Journal of Heredity 90, 502–503 (1999). [Google Scholar]
  68. Garza J. & Williamson E. Detection of reduction in population size using data from microsatellite loci. Molecular Ecology 10, 305–318 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Waples R. S. & Do C. LDNE: a program for estimating effective population size from data on linkage disequilibrium. Molecular Ecology Resources 8, 753–756 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information
srep33540-s1.docx (589.1KB, docx)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES