Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Clinical Pathology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Pathology
. 1995 Jul;48(7):620–625. doi: 10.1136/jcp.48.7.620

Quantification of proliferative activity in colorectal adenomas by mitotic counts: relationship to degree of dysplasia and histological type.

G A Meijer 1, J P Baak 1
PMCID: PMC502711  PMID: 7560167

Abstract

AIM--Proliferative activity of tumours reflects their malignant potential. In colorectal adenomas, a subjective impression of the number of mitoses is a criterion often used to assess the degree of dysplasia. Since these subjective impressions of mitotic activity may lack reproducibility, the aim of this study was to perform an objective analysis. METHODS--Mitotic counts were conducted in tissue sections of 59 colorectal adenomas. Of these, 20 showed mild, 20 moderate, and 19 severe dysplasia, according to blind duplicate assessments by two pathologists. Forty three were classified as tubular adenomas and 16 as "villous" adenomas (tubulo-villous and villous). The number of mitoses, both per unit area of epithelium (area weighted mitotic counts, AWMC) and per colonic crypt (mitotic counts per colonic crypt MCCC), was scored in the most dysplastic area within the adenoma. Mitotic figures were counted using a light microscope (ocular x 10, objective x 40, NA 0.75), and the area of the glandular epithelium was measured using an interactive video overlay measurement system. Twenty glands per specimen were assessed. In the intra-observer reproducibility tests, the coefficients of error for the AWMC and MCCC were 4.5% and 7.4% respectively. RESULTS--For the AWMC a significant difference was found between mild and moderate as well as between mild and severe dysplasia, but not between moderate and severe dysplasia. The results of the MCCC showed the same trend, but the differences did not reach a significant level. Furthermore, cases classified as mild dysplasia were found that showed numerous mitoses, while cases classified as severe dysplasia were found with only very few mitoses. No significant difference in AWMC was found between tubular and villous adenomas. Thus the different malignant potential of tubular and villous adenomas was not reflected by a difference in AWMC. A seemingly strong difference for MCCC between tubular and "villous" adenomas appeared to depend completely on the difference in crypt size between these two groups. CONCLUSIONS--The area weighted mitotic count, rather than the mitotic count per colonic crypt, may be useful for assessing the proliferation rate in colorectal adenomas.

Full text

PDF
625

Images in this article

620Image
on p.620
622Image
on p.622
623Image
on p.623

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Atkin W. S., Morson B. C., Cuzick J. Long-term risk of colorectal cancer after excision of rectosigmoid adenomas. N Engl J Med. 1992 Mar 5;326(10):658–662. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199203053261002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baak J. P. Mitosis counting in tumors. Hum Pathol. 1990 Jul;21(7):683–685. doi: 10.1016/0046-8177(90)90026-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Donhuijsen K., Schmidt U., Hirche H., van Beuningen D., Budach V. Changes in mitotic rate and cell cycle fractions caused by delayed fixation. Hum Pathol. 1990 Jul;21(7):709–714. doi: 10.1016/0046-8177(90)90030-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Grinnell R. S. THE GRADING AND PROGNOSIS OF CARCINOMA OF THE COLON AND RECTUM. Ann Surg. 1939 Apr;109(4):500–533. doi: 10.1097/00000658-193904000-00002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Grossman S., Milos M. L., Tekawa I. S., Jewell N. P. Colonoscopic screening of persons with suspected risk factors for colon cancer: II. Past history of colorectal neoplasms. Gastroenterology. 1989 Feb;96(2 Pt 1):299–306. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(89)91551-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Haapasalo H., Collan Y., Montironi R., Pesonen E., Atkin N. B. Consistency of quantitative methods in ovarian tumor histopathology. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 1990;9(3):208–216. doi: 10.1097/00004347-199007000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Haapasalo H., Pesonen E., Collan Y. Volume corrected mitotic index (M/V-INDEX). The standard of mitotic activity in neoplasms. Pathol Res Pract. 1989 Nov;185(5):551–554. doi: 10.1016/S0344-0338(89)80191-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Johnston P. G., O'Brien M. J., Dervan P. A., Carney D. N. Immunohistochemical analysis of cell kinetic parameters in colonic adenocarcinomas, adenomas, and normal mucosa. Hum Pathol. 1989 Jul;20(7):696–700. doi: 10.1016/0046-8177(89)90158-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kanemitsu T., Koike A., Yamamoto S. Study of the cell proliferation kinetics in ulcerative colitis, adenomatous polyps, and cancer. Cancer. 1985 Sep 1;56(5):1094–1098. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19850901)56:5<1094::aid-cncr2820560523>3.0.co;2-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Konishi F., Morson B. C. Pathology of colorectal adenomas: a colonoscopic survey. J Clin Pathol. 1982 Aug;35(8):830–841. doi: 10.1136/jcp.35.8.830. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kronborg O., Fenger C. Prognostic evaluation of planned follow-up in patients with colorectal adenomas. An interim report. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1987 Nov;2(4):203–207. doi: 10.1007/BF01649506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lipkin M. Phase 1 and phase 2 proliferative lesions of colonic epithelial cells in diseases leading to colonic cancer. Cancer. 1974 Sep;34(3):suppl–suppl:888. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197409)34:3+<878::aid-cncr2820340715>3.0.co;2-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Marx J. How p53 suppresses cell growth. Science. 1993 Dec 10;262(5140):1644–1645. doi: 10.1126/science.8259506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Meijer G. A., Baak J. P. Cytonuclear morphometry in the assessment of dysplasia in colorectal adenomatous polyps. A pilot study. Pathol Res Pract. 1992 Feb;188(1-2):148–156. doi: 10.1016/s0344-0338(11)81172-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Meijer G. A., Fleege J. C., Baak J. P. Stereological assessment of architectural changes in dysplastic epithelium of colorectal adenomas. Pathol Res Pract. 1994 Apr;190(4):333–341. doi: 10.1016/S0344-0338(11)80405-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Meijer G. A., van Diest P. J., Fleege J. C., Baak J. P. Syntactic structure analysis of the arrangement of nuclei in dysplastic epithelium of colorectal adenomatous polyps. Anal Quant Cytol Histol. 1992 Dec;14(6):491–498. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Nava H., Carlsson G., Petrelli N. J., Herrera L., Mittelman A. Follow-up colonoscopy in patients with colorectal adenomatous polyps. Dis Colon Rectum. 1987 Jun;30(6):465–468. doi: 10.1007/BF02556498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Rowlands D. C., Brown H. E., Barber P. C., Jones E. L. The effect of tissue fixation on immunostaining for proliferating cell nuclear antigen with the monoclonal antibody PC10. J Pathol. 1991 Dec;165(4):356–357. doi: 10.1002/path.1711650415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Rubio C. A. Atypical mitoses in colorectal adenomas. Pathol Res Pract. 1991 May;187(4):508–513. doi: 10.1016/S0344-0338(11)80015-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Spratt J. S., Spratt J. A. Growth rates of benign and malignant neoplasms of the colon. Prog Clin Biol Res. 1985;186:103–120. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Vatn M. H., Stalsberg H. The prevalence of polyps of the large intestine in Oslo: an autopsy study. Cancer. 1982 Feb 15;49(4):819–825. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19820215)49:4<819::aid-cncr2820490435>3.0.co;2-d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Williams A. R., Balasooriya B. A., Day D. W. Polyps and cancer of the large bowel: a necropsy study in Liverpool. Gut. 1982 Oct;23(10):835–842. doi: 10.1136/gut.23.10.835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Williams G. T. Dysplasia in the large intestine. Pathol Res Pract. 1985 Dec;180(6):656–664. doi: 10.1016/S0344-0338(85)80045-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Winawer S. J., O'Brien M. J., Waye J. D., Kronborg O., Bond J., Frühmorgen P., Sobin L. H., Burt R., Zauber A., Morson B. Risk and surveillance of individuals with colorectal polyps. Who Collaborating Centre for the Prevention of Colorectal Cancer. Bull World Health Organ. 1990;68(6):789–795. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Wynford-Thomas D. Oncogenes and anti-oncogenes; the molecular basis of tumour behaviour. J Pathol. 1991 Nov;165(3):187–201. doi: 10.1002/path.1711650302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. van Diest P. J., Baak J. P., Matze-Cok P., Wisse-Brekelmans E. C., van Galen C. M., Kurver P. H., Bellot S. M., Fijnheer J., van Gorp L. H., Kwee W. S. Reproducibility of mitosis counting in 2,469 breast cancer specimens: results from the Multicenter Morphometric Mammary Carcinoma Project. Hum Pathol. 1992 Jun;23(6):603–607. doi: 10.1016/0046-8177(92)90313-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Pathology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES