Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Clinical Pathology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Pathology
. 1990 Dec;43(12):969–976. doi: 10.1136/jcp.43.12.969

Medical students' views on necropsies.

E W Benbow 1
PMCID: PMC502967  PMID: 2266182

Abstract

Second and third year medical students were invited to write down their comments about necropsies during a pilot study of a postal questionnaire on the subject. Their comments were analysed in detail on the following aspects: about how useful and necessary a procedure the necropsy is in medical practice and in education; their personal distaste for the procedure; whether attendance at a necropsy should remain a compulsory part of a medical education; staff attitudes; observance of relatives' wishes; and feelings about necropsies carried out on self or relatives. The data collated from the questionnaire showed that, although students regard the necropsy as useful in clinical practice, a single demonstration does not clarify what its uses are. For some, the necropsy represents disrespect to its subject, and few students seemed aware of the use of the necropsy as an instrument of quality control. It is concluded that the unpleasant aspects of a necropsy demonstration should be kept to a minimum to encourage attendance and promote a sense of its value, and that it might be useful to influence and modify students' opinions before they become entrenched, perhaps by giving a higher priority to training in discussing dying and death in the medical curricula.

Full text

PDF
973

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ahronheim J. C., Bernholc A. S., Clark W. D. Age trends in autopsy rates. Striking decline in late life. JAMA. 1983 Sep 2;250(9):1182–1186. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson N. H., Shanks J. H., McCluggage G. W., Toner P. G. Necropsies in clinical audit. J Clin Pathol. 1989 Sep;42(9):897–901. doi: 10.1136/jcp.42.9.897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Anderson R. E., Hill R. B., Key C. R. The sensitivity and specificity of clinical diagnostics during five decades. Toward an understanding of necessary fallibility. JAMA. 1989 Mar 17;261(11):1610–1617. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Anderson R. E., Hill R. B. The autopsy in academic medical centers in the United States. Hum Pathol. 1988 Dec;19(12):1369–1371. doi: 10.1016/s0046-8177(88)80227-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Anderson R. E., Hill R. B. The current status of the autopsy in academic medical centers in the United States. Am J Clin Pathol. 1989 Oct;92(4 Suppl 1):S31–S37. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. BEADENKOPF W. G., POLAN A. K., MARKS R. U., TORNATORE L. M. SOME DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS OF AN AUTOPSIED POPULATION. J Chronic Dis. 1965 Apr;18:333–351. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(65)90038-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Boers M. The prospects of autopsy: mortui vivos docuerunt? ("Have the dead taught the living?"). Am J Med. 1989 Mar;86(3):322–324. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(89)90304-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Britton M. Diagnostic errors discovered at autopsy. Acta Med Scand. 1974 Sep;196(3):203–210. doi: 10.1111/j.0954-6820.1974.tb00996.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Brown H. G. Lay perceptions of autopsy. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1984 Jun;108(6):446–448. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cameron H. M., McGoogan E. A prospective study of 1152 hospital autopsies: I. Inaccuracies in death certification. J Pathol. 1981 Apr;133(4):273–283. doi: 10.1002/path.1711330402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Cameron H. M., McGoogan E. A prospective study of 1152 hospital autopsies: II. Analysis of inaccuracies in clinical diagnoses and their significance. J Pathol. 1981 Apr;133(4):285–300. doi: 10.1002/path.1711330403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Cameron H. M., McGoogan E., Clarke J., Wilson B. A. Trends in hospital necropsy rates: Scotland 1961-74. Br Med J. 1977 Jun 18;1(6076):1577–1580. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.6076.1577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Cameron H. M., McGoogan E., Watson H. Necropsy: a yardstick for clinical diagnoses. Br Med J. 1980 Oct 11;281(6246):985–988. doi: 10.1136/bmj.281.6246.985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Cameron H. M. The autopsy, past and present. J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1984 Oct;18(4):236–239. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Christian M. S. Incidence and implications of natural deaths of road users. BMJ. 1988 Oct 22;297(6655):1021–1024. doi: 10.1136/bmj.297.6655.1021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Cottreau C., McIntyre L., Favara B. E. Professional attitudes toward the autopsy. A survey of clinicians and pathologists. Am J Clin Pathol. 1989 Nov;92(5):673–676. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/92.5.673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Favara B. E., Cottreau C., McIntyre L., Valdes-Dapena M. Pediatric pathology and the autopsy. Pediatr Pathol. 1989;9(2):109–116. doi: 10.3109/15513818909022339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Fowler E. F., Nicol A. G., Reid I. N. Evaluation of a teaching hospital necropsy service. J Clin Pathol. 1977 Jun;30(6):575–578. doi: 10.1136/jcp.30.6.575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Freeman J. T. The autopsy in geriatrics. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1975 Jan;23(1):1–10. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1975.tb00373.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Friederici H. H. Reflections on the postmortem audit. JAMA. 1988 Dec 16;260(23):3461–3465. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Goldman L., Sayson R., Robbins S., Cohn L. H., Bettmann M., Weisberg M. The value of the autopsy in three medical eras. N Engl J Med. 1983 Apr 28;308(17):1000–1005. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198304283081704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. HOWELL T. H. Causes of death in nonagenarians. Gerontol Clin (Basel) 1963;5:139–143. doi: 10.1159/000244785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Harrison M., Hourihane D. O. Quality assurance programme for necropsies. J Clin Pathol. 1989 Nov;42(11):1190–1193. doi: 10.1136/jcp.42.11.1190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Hartveit F. Clinical and post-mortem assessment of the cause of death. J Pathol. 1977 Dec;123(4):193–210. doi: 10.1002/path.1711230402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Hill R. B., Anderson R. E. Is a valid quality assurance program possible without the autopsy? Hum Pathol. 1988 Oct;19(10):1125–1126. doi: 10.1016/s0046-8177(88)80142-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Iversen O. H. The teaching of general pathology in European undergraduate education programs in medicine. Pathol Res Pract. 1986 Jun;181(3):365–369. doi: 10.1016/S0344-0338(86)80124-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Karwinski B., Hartveit F. Death certification: increased clinical confidence in diagnosis and lack of interest in confirmation by necropsy is not justified. J Clin Pathol. 1989 Jan;42(1):13–17. doi: 10.1136/jcp.42.1.13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. McGoogan E., Cameron H. M. Clinical attitudes to the autopsy. Scott Med J. 1978 Jan;23(1):19–22. doi: 10.1177/003693307802300106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. McPhee S. J., Bottles K., Lo B., Saika G., Crommie D. To redeem them from death. Reactions of family members to autopsy. Am J Med. 1986 Apr;80(4):665–671. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(86)90822-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Mercer J., Talbot I. C. Clinical diagnosis: a post-mortem assessment of accuracy in the 1980s. Postgrad Med J. 1985 Aug;61(718):713–716. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.61.718.713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Middleton K., Clarke E., Homann S., Naughton B., Neely D., Repasy A., Yarnold P. R., Yungbluth M., Webster J. R., Jr An autopsy-based study of diagnostic errors in geriatric and nongeriatric adult patients. Arch Intern Med. 1989 Aug;149(8):1809–1812. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Peacock S. J., Machin D., Duboulay C. E., Kirkham N. The autopsy: a useful tool or an old relic? J Pathol. 1988 Sep;156(1):9–14. doi: 10.1002/path.1711560105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Puxty J. A., Horan M. A., Fox R. A. Necropsies in the elderly. Lancet. 1983 Jun 4;1(8336):1262–1264. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(83)92708-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Reid W. A., Harkin P. J., Jack A. S. Continual audit of clinical diagnostic accuracy by computer: a study of 592 autopsy cases. J Pathol. 1987 Oct;153(2):99–107. doi: 10.1002/path.1711530203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Roberts W. C. The autopsy: its decline and a suggestion for its revival. N Engl J Med. 1978 Aug 17;299(7):332–338. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197808172990704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Russell G. A., Berry P. J. Postmortem audit in a paediatric cardiology unit. J Clin Pathol. 1989 Sep;42(9):912–918. doi: 10.1136/jcp.42.9.912. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Schned A. R., Mogielnicki R. P., Stauffer M. E. A comprehensive quality assessment program on the autopsy service. Am J Clin Pathol. 1986 Aug;86(2):133–138. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/86.2.133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Underwood J. C., Cotton D. W., Stephenson T. J. Audit and necropsy. Lancet. 1989 Feb 25;1(8635):442–442. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(89)90039-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. WILSON L. A., LAWSON I. R., BRASS W. Multiple disorders in the elderly. A clinical and statistical study. Lancet. 1962 Oct 27;2(7261):841–843. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(62)90627-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Waldron H. A., Vickerstaff L. Necropsy rates in the United Birmingham Hospitals. Br Med J. 1975 May 10;2(5966):326–328. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5966.326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Pathology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES