Skip to main content
PMC home page
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1992 Dec 1;89(23):11401–11405. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.23.11401

Phage phi 29 regulatory protein p4 stabilizes the binding of the RNA polymerase to the late promoter in a process involving direct protein-protein contacts.

B Nuez 1, F Rojo 1, M Salas 1
PMCID: PMC50558  PMID: 1454827

Abstract

Transcription from the late promoter, PA3, of Bacillus subtilis phage phi 29 is activated by the viral regulatory protein p4. A kinetic analysis of the activation process has revealed that the role of protein p4 is to stabilize the binding of RNA polymerase to the promoter as a closed complex without significantly affecting further steps of the initiation process. Electrophoretic band-shift assays performed with a DNA fragment spanning only the protein p4 binding site showed that RNA polymerase could efficiently retard the complex formed by protein p4 bound to the DNA. Similarly, when a DNA fragment containing only the RNA polymerase-binding region of PA3 was used, p4 greatly stimulated the binding of RNA polymerase to the DNA. These results strongly suggest that p4 and RNA polymerase contact each other at the PA3 promoter. In the light of current knowledge of the p4 activation mechanism, we propose that direct contacts between the two proteins participate in the activation process.

Full text

PDF
11404

Images in this article

11403Image
on p.11403
11404Image
on p.11404
11404Image
on p.11404
11405Image
on p.11405

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barthelemy I., Salas M. Characterization of a new prokaryotic transcriptional activator and its DNA recognition site. J Mol Biol. 1989 Jul 20;208(2):225–232. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(89)90384-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bell A., Gaston K., Williams R., Chapman K., Kolb A., Buc H., Minchin S., Williams J., Busby S. Mutations that alter the ability of the Escherichia coli cyclic AMP receptor protein to activate transcription. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990 Dec 25;18(24):7243–7250. doi: 10.1093/nar/18.24.7243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bracco L., Kotlarz D., Kolb A., Diekmann S., Buc H. Synthetic curved DNA sequences can act as transcriptional activators in Escherichia coli. EMBO J. 1989 Dec 20;8(13):4289–4296. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb08615.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Buc H., McClure W. R. Kinetics of open complex formation between Escherichia coli RNA polymerase and the lac UV5 promoter. Evidence for a sequential mechanism involving three steps. Biochemistry. 1985 May 21;24(11):2712–2723. doi: 10.1021/bi00332a018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bushman F. D., Shang C., Ptashne M. A single glutamic acid residue plays a key role in the transcriptional activation function of lambda repressor. Cell. 1989 Sep 22;58(6):1163–1171. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90514-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chan B., Minchin S., Busby S. Unwinding of duplex DNA during transcription initiation at the Escherichia coli galactose operon overlapping promoters. FEBS Lett. 1990 Jul 2;267(1):46–50. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(90)80284-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Eschenlauer A. C., Reznikoff W. S. Escherichia coli catabolite gene activator protein mutants defective in positive control of lac operon transcription. J Bacteriol. 1991 Aug;173(16):5024–5029. doi: 10.1128/jb.173.16.5024-5029.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gartenberg M. R., Crothers D. M. Synthetic DNA bending sequences increase the rate of in vitro transcription initiation at the Escherichia coli lac promoter. J Mol Biol. 1991 May 20;219(2):217–230. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(91)90563-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gaston K., Bell A., Kolb A., Buc H., Busby S. Stringent spacing requirements for transcription activation by CRP. Cell. 1990 Aug 24;62(4):733–743. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90118-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hawley D. K., McClure W. R. In vitro comparison of initiation properties of bacteriophage lambda wild-type PR and x3 mutant promoters. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Nov;77(11):6381–6385. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.11.6381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hawley D. K., McClure W. R. Mechanism of activation of transcription initiation from the lambda PRM promoter. J Mol Biol. 1982 May 25;157(3):493–525. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(82)90473-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Herbert M., Kolb A., Buc H. Overlapping promoters and their control in Escherichia coli: the gal case. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 May;83(9):2807–2811. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.9.2807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Igarashi K., Hanamura A., Makino K., Aiba H., Aiba H., Mizuno T., Nakata A., Ishihama A. Functional map of the alpha subunit of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase: two modes of transcription activation by positive factors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Oct 15;88(20):8958–8962. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.20.8958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Krummel B., Chamberlin M. J. RNA chain initiation by Escherichia coli RNA polymerase. Structural transitions of the enzyme in early ternary complexes. Biochemistry. 1989 Sep 19;28(19):7829–7842. doi: 10.1021/bi00445a045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lavigne M., Herbert M., Kolb A., Buc H. Upstream curved sequences influence the initiation of transcription at the Escherichia coli galactose operon. J Mol Biol. 1992 Mar 20;224(2):293–306. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(92)90995-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Leirmo S., Gourse R. L. Factor-independent activation of Escherichia coli rRNA transcription. I. Kinetic analysis of the roles of the upstream activator region and supercoiling on transcription of the rrnB P1 promoter in vitro. J Mol Biol. 1991 Aug 5;220(3):555–568. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(91)90100-k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Maeda S., Ozawa Y., Mizuno T., Mizushima S. Stereospecific positioning of the cis-acting sequence with respect to the canonical promoter is required for activation of the ompC gene by a positive regulator, OmpR, in Escherichia coli. J Mol Biol. 1988 Aug 5;202(3):433–441. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(88)90276-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. McAllister C. F., Achberger E. C. Rotational orientation of upstream curved DNA affects promoter function in Bacillus subtilis. J Biol Chem. 1989 Jun 25;264(18):10451–10456. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. McClure W. R. Mechanism and control of transcription initiation in prokaryotes. Annu Rev Biochem. 1985;54:171–204. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.54.070185.001131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. McClure W. R. Rate-limiting steps in RNA chain initiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Oct;77(10):5634–5638. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.10.5634. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Mecsas J., Cowing D. W., Gross C. A. Development of RNA polymerase-promoter contacts during open complex formation. J Mol Biol. 1991 Aug 5;220(3):585–597. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(91)90102-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Mellado R. P., Barthelemy I., Salas M. In vivo transcription of bacteriophage phi 29 DNA early and late promoter sequences. J Mol Biol. 1986 Sep 20;191(2):191–197. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(86)90256-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Menendez M., Kolb A., Buc H. A new target for CRP action at the malT promoter. EMBO J. 1987 Dec 20;6(13):4227–4234. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1987.tb02771.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Morett E., Buck M. In vivo studies on the interaction of RNA polymerase-sigma 54 with the Klebsiella pneumoniae and Rhizobium meliloti nifH promoters. The role of NifA in the formation of an open promoter complex. J Mol Biol. 1989 Nov 5;210(1):65–77. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(89)90291-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Popham D. L., Szeto D., Keener J., Kustu S. Function of a bacterial activator protein that binds to transcriptional enhancers. Science. 1989 Feb 3;243(4891):629–635. doi: 10.1126/science.2563595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Ren Y. L., Garges S., Adhya S., Krakow J. S. Cooperative DNA binding of heterologous proteins: evidence for contact between the cyclic AMP receptor protein and RNA polymerase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Jun;85(12):4138–4142. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.12.4138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Rojo F., Salas M. A DNA curvature can substitute phage phi 29 regulatory protein p4 when acting as a transcriptional repressor. EMBO J. 1991 Nov;10(11):3429–3438. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb04907.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Rojo F., Zaballos A., Salas M. Bend induced by the phage phi 29 transcriptional activator in the viral late promoter is required for activation. J Mol Biol. 1990 Feb 20;211(4):713–725. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(90)90072-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Schickor P., Metzger W., Werel W., Lederer H., Heumann H. Topography of intermediates in transcription initiation of E.coli. EMBO J. 1990 Jul;9(7):2215–2220. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb07391.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Serrano M., Barthelemy I., Salas M. Transcription activation at a distance by phage phi 29 protein p4. Effect of bent and non-bent intervening DNA sequences. J Mol Biol. 1991 Jun 5;219(3):403–414. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(91)90182-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Straney D. C., Straney S. B., Crothers D. M. Synergy between Escherichia coli CAP protein and RNA polymerase in the lac promoter open complex. J Mol Biol. 1989 Mar 5;206(1):41–57. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(89)90522-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Su W., Porter S., Kustu S., Echols H. DNA-looping and enhancer activity: association between DNA-bound NtrC activator and RNA polymerase at the bacterial glnA promoter. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Jul;87(14):5504–5508. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.14.5504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Tsung K., Brissette R. E., Inouye M. Enhancement of RNA polymerase binding to promoters by a transcriptional activator, OmpR, in Escherichia coli: its positive and negative effects on transcription. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Aug;87(15):5940–5944. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.15.5940. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Ushida C., Aiba H. Helical phase dependent action of CRP: effect of the distance between the CRP site and the -35 region on promoter activity. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990 Nov 11;18(21):6325–6330. doi: 10.1093/nar/18.21.6325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES