Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Plant Biotechnology Journal logoLink to Plant Biotechnology Journal
. 2016 Jan 25;14(8):1661–1672. doi: 10.1111/pbi.12527

Down‐regulation of OsSPX1 caused semi‐male sterility, resulting in reduction of grain yield in rice

Kang Zhang 1,†, Qian Song 1,†, Qiang Wei 1,†, Chunchao Wang 1, Liwei Zhang 1, Wenying Xu 1,✉, Zhen Su 1,✉
PMCID: PMC5066639  PMID: 26806409

Summary

OsSPX1, a rice SPX domain gene, involved in the phosphate (Pi)‐sensing mechanism plays an essential role in the Pi‐signalling network through interaction with OsPHR2. In this study, we focused on the potential function of OsSPX1 during rice reproductive phase. Based on investigation of OsSPX1 antisense and sense transgenic rice lines in the paddy fields, we discovered that the down‐regulation of OsSPX1 caused reduction of seed‐setting rate and filled grain number. Through examination of anthers and pollens of the transgenic and wild‐type plants by microscopy, we found that the antisense of OsSPX1 gene led to semi‐male sterility, with lacking of mature pollen grains and phenotypes with a disordered surface of anthers and pollens. We further conducted rice whole‐genome GeneChip analysis to elucidate the possible molecular mechanism underlying why the down‐regulation of OsSPX1 caused deficiencies in anthers and pollens and lower seed‐setting rate in rice. The down‐regulation of OsSPX1 significantly affected expression of genes involved in carbohydrate metabolism and sugar transport, anther development, cell cycle, etc. These genes may be related to pollen fertility and male gametophyte development. Our study demonstrated that down‐regulation of OsSPX1 disrupted rice normal anther and pollen development by affecting carbohydrate metabolism and sugar transport, leading to semi‐male sterility, and ultimately resulted in low seed‐setting rate and grain yield.

Keywords: OsSPX1, rice, pollen fertility, grain yield, expression profiling

Introduction

Rice (Oryza sativa), one of the major food staples for the world's population, is a model monocot plant for molecular biological study and a model crop for agronomical improvement. The rice grain yield is affected by many genetic and environmental factors, such as photosynthesis ability, nutrient efficiency, processes of pollination and fertilization, biotic and abiotic stresses, etc. Pollen fertility is a critical factor for rice yield. Dozens of genes are involved in anther and pollen development in rice and Arabidopsis, including anther cell differentiation, meiosis and pollen development (Wilson and Zhang, 2009). The development of pollen and anther requires nutrients such as sugars and lipids from source organs to support pollen development and maturation (Goetz et al., 2001). Carbon Starved Anther (CSA), encoding a MYB transcription factor, is involved in sugar partitioning and the csa mutant showed low carbohydrate level in later anthers with male sterility (Zhang et al., 2010). Defective Pollen Wall (DPW) is a fatty acyl reductase, and the mutant dpw showed defective anther development and degenerated pollen grains with an irregular exine (Shi et al., 2011). The tapetum degeneration triggered by a programmed cell death (PCD) process provides cellular contents supporting pollen wall formation (Wu and Cheun, 2000). The TDR (Tapetum Degeneration Retardation) encodes a putative transcription factor with a bHLH domain. In the tdr mutant, the tapetum PCD was retarded in the anther with aborted pollen development (Li et al., 2006). The Arabidopsis ortholog AMS (Aborted Microspores) showed similar function (Xu et al., 2010). UDP‐glucose pyrophosphorylase (UGPase) is a key enzyme in carbohydrate metabolism, producing UDP‐glucose for sucrose synthesis in leaves. In Arabidopsis pho1 mutants, Ugp was found to be up‐regulated under conditions of phosphate deficiency (Ciereszko et al., 2001). Rice Ugp1 is essential for pollen callose deposition, and the Ugp1‐silenced plants showed thermosensitive male sterility (Chen et al., 2007). Rice OsUgp2 is a pollen‐preferential gene and plays a critical role in starch accumulation during pollen maturation (Mu et al., 2009).

Phosphorus is one of the major mineral nutrients for plant growth and development. Phosphate (Pi) has regulatory function in reactions of photosynthetic carbon metabolism and is involved in the photosynthetic carbon assimilation and carbon partitioning processes between starch and sucrose (Rao, 1996), through the operation of the Pi translocator to facilitate a rapid exchange of Pi, triose‐P and 3‐phosphoglyceric acid (PGA) (Flugge, 1995). The Pi concentration inside and outside the chloroplast could affect the photosynthetic carbon reduction and control the balance between starch in chloroplast and sucrose in the cytosol (Rao, 1996). The dynamic interactions between sink and source tissues affected the response of photosynthesis to phosphate limitation (Pieters et al., 2001).

There exists close relationship between phosphate signalling and rice reproductive development. Rice plants can accumulate abundant Pi in vegetative organs such as leaves at the early developmental stage and transport the Pi stored in the leaves to reproductive organs such as panicle at the late developmental stage (Marschner, 1995). The rice phosphate transporter gene OsPT8 is involved in Pi translocation from vegetative organs to reproductive organs in rice. The suppression of OsPT8 resulted in lower seed‐setting rate, higher phosphorus content in the panicle axis and decreased phosphorus content in unfilled grain hulls (Jia et al., 2011). Under high Pi level, overexpressing OsPHR2 up‐regulated some Pi transporter genes and suppressed the growth parameters during harvest stage, for example lower seed‐setting rate, lower tiller number and grain number. In particular, the OsPHR2‐Ov1 transgenic line showed disordered male reproductive organs such as twisted anther structures, few pollen grains and low pollen viability (Zhou et al., 2008). The ltn1 (OsPHO2) mutant significantly reduced tiller number and fertility compare to WT (Hu et al., 2011). OsSPX1, as one of the Pi‐dependent inhibitors of OsPHR2 activity in rice (Wang et al., 2014), is involved in the Pi starvation signalling network related to OsPHR2 and OsPHO2 (Liu et al., 2010), but there is no any report about the effect of OsSPX1 on pollen development and grain yield.

In plants, many SPX domain proteins (with SPX domain, named after the SYG1/Pho81/XPR1 proteins) were identified to be involved in the phosphate‐related signal transduction pathway and regulation pathways. For example, the AtPHO1 (At3g23430) protein is involved in ion transport in Arabidopsis (Hamburger et al., 2002; Stefanovic et al., 2007; Wang et al., 2004, 2008); the AtSPX family proteins were considered as part of the phosphate‐signalling pathways controlled by PHR1 and SIZ1 (Duan et al., 2008); AtSPX1 was identified as the inhibitor of PHR1 and the SPX1/PHR1 interaction was Pi‐dependent (Puga et al., 2014); the OsSPX1 is involved in the Pi‐sensing mechanism (Liu et al., 2010); OsSPX1 and OsSPX2 are Pi‐dependent inhibitors of OsPHR2 through the protein‐protein interaction and are involved in the Pi‐sensing process of rice (Wang et al., 2014); OsSPX3 and OsSPX5 are redundant genes negatively regulating root‐to‐shoot Pi translocation and restored phosphate balance under phosphate starvation (Shi et al., 2014); OsSPX4 protein is responsive to Pi concentration and regulates the activity of OsPHR2 with the protein–protein interaction (Lv et al., 2014). Besides the essential role of SPX domain proteins involved in phosphate signalling, some of them have other key functions. For example, a PHO1 family protein, SHB1, contains an N‐terminal SPX domain and a C‐terminal EXS domain and was reported to specifically regulate blue‐light responses and/or possibly red and far‐red light responses in Arabidopsis (Kang and Ni, 2006). Both SPX and EXS domains likely anchor SHB1 to a protein complex, and the SPX domain is critical for SHB1 signalling, which plays dual roles in photoperiodic and autonomous flowering (Zhou and Ni, 2009; 2010). Furthermore, SHB1 was identified as a positive regulator of Arabidopsis seed development that affected both cell size and number (Zhou et al., 2009).

Our previous study reported that constitutive overexpression of OsSPX1 in tobacco and Arabidopsis plants caused the improvement of cold tolerance with decreasing total leaf Pi (Zhao et al., 2009) and down‐regulation of OsSPX1 caused transgenetic rice high sensitivity to cold and oxidative stresses in seedling stage (Wang et al., 2013). In the generated OsSPX1 transgenic rice lines, we observed the Ubi::OsSPX1‐antisense (down‐regulation of OsSPX1) lines showed significantly lower seed‐setting rate in the reproductive stage, which may be correlated with semi‐male sterility in the Ubi::OsSPX1‐antisense lines. In this study, we focused on the effect of OsSPX1 on pollen development and grain yield with the OsSPX1 antisense and sense transgenic rice lines. We conducted rice whole‐genome GeneChip to elucidate the possible molecular mechanism and identified the downstream key genes involved in the relationship between OsSPX1 and rice pollen development and grain yield. This work on OsSPX1 may aid understanding of the possible novel functions of OsSPX1 and be greatly beneficial for improving plant growth and crop grain yield.

Results

Antisense of OsSPX1 caused reduction of rice grain yield in paddy fields

To investigate the traits during reproductive stages, the Ubi::OsSPX1‐antisense transgenic, Ubi::OsSPX1‐sense transgenic and wild‐type (WT) plants were planted in paddy fields. The construction of OsSPX1 transgenic lines was described in our previous work (Wang et al., 2013). The expression levels of OsSPX1 in the mature leaves of WT and transgenic rice lines were shown in Figure S1. OsSPX1 were significantly suppressed in Ubi::OsSPX1‐antisense transgenic lines (lines A1 and A2) compared to WT plants (left chart in Figure S1), and constitutively and more strongly expressed in Ubi::OsSPX1‐sense transgenic lines (S1 and S2) than WT plants (right chart in Figure S1).

During the ripening phases, we compared the traits related to grain yield among the Ubi::OsSPX1‐antisense transgenic lines, Ubi::OsSPX1‐sense transgenic lines and WT plants. The Ubi::OsSPX1‐antisense transgenic lines (A1 and A2) exhibited lower seed‐setting rate and filled grain number (Figure 1). The panicles in lines A1 and A2 were straight while those in Ubi::OsSPX1‐sense transgenic lines (S1 and S2) and WT plants were bent (Figure 1a). The harvested panicles of A1 and A2 lines were not mature, and the panicles of A1 were much smaller than those of WT, S1 and S2 (Figure 1b, the empty seeds in lines A1 and A2 were highlighted by white arrows). We separated the filled and unfilled grains of individual plants of each lines, and noticed the seed‐setting ratio was significantly lower in A1 and A2 than those in WT, S1 and S2 (Figure 1c). The seed‐setting rate in A1 and A2 lines was at least 50% lower compared to WT, S1 and S2 lines (the t‐test results were significant, P‐values were lower than 0.01). The lower seed‐setting rate led to a reduction of grain yield in the Ubi::OsSPX1‐antisense transgenic rice plants (Figure 1d), and the phenotype was stable for later generations (Figure S2).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Agricultural traits and anther phenotypes of WT, Ubi::OsSPX1‐antisense and Ubi::OsSPX1‐sense transgenic rice lines. (a) Comparison of Ubi::OsSPX1‐antisense transgenic lines (lines A1, and A2, on the left), Ubi::OsSPX1‐sense transgenic lines (lines S1, and S2, on the right) with the wild‐type (WT) rice at the grain‐filling stage grown in paddy fields. (b) The harvested panicles of Ubi::OsSPX1‐antisense transgenic lines (lines A1, and A2, on the left), Ubi::OsSPX1‐sense transgenic lines (lines S1, and S2, on the right) and the wild‐type (WT) rice. (white arrows indicate empty seeds). (c) The total grains of the plant of Ubi::OsSPX1‐antisense transgenic lines (lines A1, and A2, on the left), Ubi::OsSPX1‐sense transgenic lines (lines S1, and S2, on the right) and the wild‐type (WT) rice. (d) Comparison of seed‐setting rate of Ubi::OsSPX1‐antisense transgenic lines (in blue bars), Ubi::OsSPX1‐sense transgenic lines (in red bars) with the WT (in grey bars) rice. (e) Comparison of spikelets after removing half of the lemma and palea, Bar = 0.5 cm. (f) Comparison of anthers from Ubi::OsSPX1‐antisense transgenic lines (lines A1, and A2, on the left), Ubi::OsSPX1‐sense transgenic lines (lines S1, and S2, on the right) and the wild‐type (WT) rice, Bar = 0.1 cm. (g) Comparison of pollen grains stained with Alexander's solution, Bar = 50 μm. (h) Percentage of stained pollen grains.

Antisense of OsSPX1 caused lower pollen viability with disordered pollen and anther

The pollen fertility is a critical factor for rice grain yield. We proposed that down‐regulation of OsSPX1 may affect the anther and pollen development in rice. We discovered that the Ubi::OsSPX1‐antisense transgenic lines showed semi‐male sterility during anther and pollen development. Figure 1e,f showed the anther phenotype of Ubi::OsSPX1‐antisense transgenic lines, Ubi::OsSPX1‐sense transgenic lines and WT plants in paddy fields. During the heading stage, the spikelets from Ubi::OsSPX1‐antisense transgenic lines had smaller pale‐yellow anthers compared to the normal yellow anthers from Ubi::OsSPX1‐sense transgenic lines and WT (Figure 1e,f). Unlike mature pollen of WT and Ubi::OsSPX1‐sense transgenic lines, large proportion of pollen of Ubi::OsSPX1‐antisense transgenic lines could not be stained by Alexander's solution (Figure 1g,h). These results indicated that the Ubi::OsSPX1‐antisense transgenic lines lacked normal mature pollen grains and this might cause the lower seed‐setting rate and filled grain number. The pollen viability of different transgenic lines and WT rice plants in the heading stage was correlated with the seed‐setting rate at the harvest stage (Figure 1d,h).

Furthermore, we examined the anther development by light microscopy and analysed the anther and pollen by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (Figure 2). At stage 12 of anther development (Zhang et al., 2011), for WT and Ubi::OsSPX1‐sense transgenic line S1, the pollen grains were full of starch and lipids and the tapetums were almost degenerated; whereas in the anther of Ubi::OsSPX1‐antisense transgenic line A1, the microspores were hardly visible and the anther locule was almost empty (Figure 2a–c).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Pollen phenotypes among WT, Ubi::OsSPX1‐antisense and Ubi::OsSPX1‐sense transgenic rice lines. (a–c) Cross section of a single locule in stage 12 for A1, WT and S1, Bar = 15 μm. (d–f) Scanning electron microscopy analysis of the anther surface of A1, WT and S1 at stage 12, Bar = 10 μm. (g–i) Scanning electron microscopy analysis of the inner surface of the anther wall layers at stage 12 for A1, WT and S1, Bar = 10 μm. (j–l) Scanning electron microscopy analysis of the pollen grain at stage 12 for A1, WT and S1, Bar = 20 μm. (m–o) Transmission electron micrograph of the pollen grain at stage 12 for A1, WT and S1, Bar = 5 μm. (p–r) Transmission electron micrograph of the pollen wall at stage 12 for A1, WT and S1, Bar = 2 μm.

The cuticle on the exterior of the anthers of Ubi::OsSPX1‐antisense transgenic line was not as well formed as those on the anther outer surface of the WT and Ubi::OsSPX1‐sense transgenic line (Figure 2d–f). The Ubisch bodies on the inner locule surface were also different (Figure 2g–i), granular for WT and Ubi::OsSPX1‐sense transgenic line S1 and shrunken for Ubi::OsSPX1‐antisense transgenic line A1. In addition, the pollen grains of WT and S1 had a smooth and particulate exine pattern, whereas the pollen grains of A1 appeared severely shrunken and empty (Figure 2j–l).

Further TEM observations showed consistent phenomena. At stage 12, the pollen grains of WT and Ubi::OsSPX1‐sense transgenic line S1 were full of storage materials, with more starch granules and lipids in S1 and WT, whereas the Ubi::OsSPX1‐antisense transgenic line A1 pollen grains were collapsed with almost no accumulated storage materials (Figure 2m–o), the storage materials in the pollen of A1, WT and S1 were correlated with the Alexander staining results for their pollen (Figure 1g). Compared with those of the WT and S1, the pollen wall of A1 showed thicker exine layer (both tectum and nexines) and almost no intine layer (Figure 2p–r).

Transcriptome map of anthers from OsSPX1 transgenic lines and WT plants

We conducted rice whole‐genome GeneChip to elucidate the possible molecular mechanism underlying the down‐regulation of OsSPX1 in causing deficiencies in anther and pollen and lower seed‐setting rate in rice. There were nine anther samples in total: three independent biological samples each were collected from Ubi::OsSPX1‐antisense transgenic line A1, Ubi::OsSPX1‐sense transgenic line S1 and WT (Nipponbare) plants during heading stage. We mainly focused on the differentially expressed probe sets between line A1 (Ubi::OsSPX1‐antisense) and line S1 (Ubi::OsSPX1‐sense), and between line A1 and WT. With ANOVA test (P ≤ 0.05) and 1.5‐fold change as cut‐off, there were 867 probe sets significantly higher expressed in anthers of line S1 than A1, and 803 probe sets were significantly lower expressed in line S1 than A1; 333 probe sets were significantly higher expressed in WT than in line A1 anthers, and 1062 probe sets significantly lower expressed in WT than A1 (shown in Figure 3a, the detailed information for each probe set was listed in Table S1). The Venn diagram in Figure 3a illustrated the intersection of probe sets between each groups, there were 237 overlapped probe sets more highly expressed both in line S1 and WT plants compared to line A1 anthers, and 543 overlapped probe sets were less expressed both in line S1 and WT plants compared to A1.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Venn diagrams analysis and MapMan view of differential expression probe sets in the anthers between line A1 and S1, and between line A1 and WT(Ni). (a) Venn diagrams illustrate the differential expression probe sets in the anthers among transgenic line A1, S1 and Ni (WT). (b) GeneBins analysis of the differential expression probe sets in the anthers between line A1 and S1. (c) MapMan view of the differential expression probe sets in the anthers between line A1 and S1. Fold changes are shown in colour, red boxes indicate up‐regulated in S1, and blue boxes indicate up‐regulated in line A1.

We classified these differentially expressed genes using GeneBins (Goffard and Weiller, 2007). Figure 3b highlighted several classes (BINs) of genes significantly more highly expressed in line S1 than in A1, including sugar porter (SP) family, starch and sucrose metabolism, etc. As to the genes significantly more highly expressed in line A1, the enriched BINs included chitinase, lipid‐transfer protein, etc. Further analysis with MapMan tool (Thimm et al., 2004) showed that there were several biological metabolism processes and large gene families in these differentially expressed genes (shown in Figure 3c). The genes related to cell wall, starch–sucrose, cell cycle and sugar transporter were highly expressed in line S1, whereas some transcription factor genes (such as WRKY, BHLH, ZIM, etc.) and hormone response genes (related to GA, ABA, ethylene, etc.) were highly expressed in line A1.

To further identify the co‐expressed probe sets with similar expression patterns in the transgenic and WT plants, both self‐organized mapping (SOM) and hierarchical methods were used for clustering the 2403 differentially expressed probe sets among line S1, line A1 and WT (listed in Table S1). A colour heat map represented the relative expression level of each probe set across the nine anther samples (shown in Figure 4, from left to right, three replicates each of line A1, WT and line S1). These probe sets could be grouped into multiple clusters, and we focused on two of them: the top one representing the probe sets lower expressed in line A1 anther samples, and the bottom one representing the probe sets higher expressed in line A1. We applied Gene Ontology (GO) analysis‐using agriGO (Du et al., 2010) and REVIGO (Supek et al., 2011)‐to the selected clusters (shown in the right side of Figure 4). For the top cluster representing the probe sets lower expressed in line A1 anther samples, the enriched GO terms were mainly related to sucrose and starch metabolism (FDR P‐value: 3.40E‐16 and 7.20E‐10, respectively), carbohydrate transport (FDR P‐value: 4.10E‐05), sugar:hydrogen symporter (FDR P‐value: 6.10E‐04), etc. As to the probe sets highly expressed in line A1 anther samples, the enriched GO terms included defence response (FDR P‐value: 9.50E‐05), chitinase activity (FDR P‐value: 2.40E‐07), etc.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Cluster and gene ontology (GO) analysis of the differentially expressed probe sets in the anthers among transgenic line A1, S1 and WT(Ni). The overview hierarchical cluster result of 2403 probe sets showing differential expression in anthers among Ubi::OsSPX1‐sense transgenic line (S1), WT(Ni) and Ubi::OsSPX1‐antisense transgenic lines (A1); the red (high) and blue (low) colours represent the relative expression level across the samples. The marked groups represent these probe sets specifically down‐regulated in line A1 (upper group) or up‐regulated in line A1 (lower group). The charts on the right represent the enriched GO terms in the probe sets belonging to the marked group.

Finally, we highlighted several enriched GO terms and functional groups for either lower or higher expressed in Ubi::OsSPX1‐antisense transgenic lines (Figures 3 and 4) based on the results including gene cluster analysis, GeneBins, MapMan, and GO enrichment analysis. Some important genes were also highlighted in Table 1 and Table S3, were involved in sucrose and starch metabolism, sugar transporter, anther development, cell cycle and microtubule‐based process, chitinase, and phenylalanine metabolism.

Table 1.

Selected differentially expressed probe sets related to enriched function terms

Probe set ID S1 vs. A1 Ni vs. A1 Locus ID Annotation
P‐value Fold change P‐value Fold change
Starch and sucrose metabolism
Os.11216.1.S1_at 1.70E‐02 1.62 3.07E‐02 1.54 LOC_Os03g55090 Alpha‐1,4 glucan phosphorylase, L isozyme
Os.57438.1.S1_at 3.57E‐02 1.76 3.70E‐02 1.76 LOC_Os02g52700 Alpha‐amylase precursor
Os.52873.1.S1_a_at 3.30E‐02 1.54 4.02E‐02 1.51 LOC_Os05g25550 ATPase 7, plasma membrane‐type
Os.52968.1.S1_at 9.61E‐03 1.78 3.56E‐02 1.56 LOC_Os11g19160 Beta‐D‐xylosidase
Os.50337.1.S1_at 4.43E‐02 2.12 5.41E‐01 1.29 LOC_Os04g33720 Beta‐fructofuranosidase, insoluble isoenzyme 3 precursor
OsAffx.26489.1.S1_at 6.59E‐03 1.81 4.12E‐02 1.52 LOC_Os04g46760 Conserved hypothetical protein
OsAffx.28245.1.S1_at 2.32E‐02 1.54 2.66E‐02 1.52 LOC_Os07g03260 CSLC10—cellulose synthase‐like family C
Os.52482.1.S1_at 3.96E‐02 1.70 8.68E‐02 1.55 LOC_Os07g36630 CSLF8—cellulose synthase‐like family F; beta1,3;1,4 glucan synthase
Os.37822.2.S1_at 3.94E‐02 1.60 3.90E‐01 1.21 LOC_Os01g12030 Endoglucanase 1 precursor
Os.54770.1.S1_at 3.90E‐03 1.97 1.89E‐02 1.68 LOC_Os02g03120 Endoglucanase 1 precursor
Os.54812.1.S1_at 1.76E‐02 2.61 2.98E‐01 1.57 LOC_Os09g36060 Endoglucanase 1 precursor
OsAffx.3061.1.S1_x_at 4.89E‐02 1.71 1.31E‐01 1.50 LOC_Os02g54030 Endo‐polygalacturonase precursor
OsAffx.17383.1.S1_at 1.73E‐02 1.66 6.61E‐01 1.09 LOC_Os08g37750 Exo‐1,3‐beta‐glucanase
Os.5670.1.S1_at 4.15E‐02 1.66 7.43E‐02 1.55 LOC_Os08g23790 Exopolygalacturonase precursor
Os.8324.1.S1_a_at 3.32E‐02 1.61 3.40E‐02 1.61 LOC_Os01g66940 Fructokinase‐1
Os.12780.1.S1_at 3.31E‐02 1.60 1.57E‐01 1.35 LOC_Os08g02120 Fructokinase‐2
Os.24051.1.S1_at 5.27E‐03 1.78 3.47E‐01 1.19 LOC_Os04g33640 Glucan endo‐1,3‐beta‐glucosidase 7 precursor
Os.24051.1.S1_x_at 4.54E‐04 1.58 2.45E‐02 1.25 LOC_Os04g33640 Glucan endo‐1,3‐beta‐glucosidase 7 precursor
Os.24051.2.S1_at 4.89E‐04 1.58 8.32E‐02 1.18 LOC_Os04g33640 Glucan endo‐1,3‐beta‐glucosidase 7 precursor
Os.33745.1.S1_at 9.96E‐03 2.11 3.24E‐02 1.83 LOC_Os01g58730 Glucan endo‐1,3‐beta‐glucosidase GVI precursor
Os.53364.1.S1_at 3.53E‐02 2.26 7.75E‐01 1.14 LOC_Os07g40740 Heparanase‐like protein 3 precursor
Os.6114.1.S1_at 1.79E‐02 2.06 5.28E‐02 1.79 LOC_Os05g09500 Hexokinase‐1
OsAffx.4483.1.S1_at 1.25E‐02 1.66 6.50E‐02 1.42 LOC_Os05g31110 Hexokinase‐1
Os.3414.1.A1_at 2.74E‐02 1.65 2.07E‐01 1.32 LOC_Os08g40930 Isoamylase
OsAffx.29137.1.S1_at 2.41E‐02 1.53 1.73E‐01 1.28 LOC_Os08g10604 Pectinesterase‐1 precursor
Os.18244.1.S1_at 1.45E‐02 1.87 4.68E‐01 1.20 LOC_Os03g53790 Periplasmic beta‐glucosidase precursor
Os.9731.1.S1_at 3.06E‐02 1.68 1.71E‐01 1.38 LOC_Os12g36810 Polygalacturonase
Os.4879.1.S1_a_at 2.50E‐02 1.52 2.56E‐01 1.22 LOC_Os01g47550 Ribokinase
Os.26441.1.S1_s_at 3.29E‐02 1.70 2.69E‐02 1.74 LOC_Os11g45710 SFR2
Os.12725.1.S1_at 3.09E‐02 1.53 1.05E‐01 1.36 LOC_Os06g06560 Soluble starch synthase 1, chloroplast precursor
Os.49091.1.S1_at 2.52E‐02 2.05 6.12E‐02 1.82 LOC_Os05g05270 Sucrose phosphate synthase
Os.25677.1.S1_at 4.21E‐02 1.91 3.69E‐01 1.34 LOC_Os03g28330 Sucrose synthase 2
Os.57465.1.S1_x_at 4.79E‐02 1.52 2.95E‐01 1.24 LOC_Os03g28330 Sucrose synthase 2
Os.49763.1.S1_s_at 1.03E‐02 2.22 2.44E‐02 1.99 LOC_Os03g17230 UDP‐glucuronic acid decarboxylase 1
Membrane transport including sugar porter and ABCG
Os.26786.1.S1_at 3.76E‐02 1.56 1.79E‐01 1.32 LOC_Os09g15330 Sugar transport protein 14
Os.50123.1.S1_x_at 1.05E‐02 1.89 4.97E‐02 1.59 LOC_Os07g10590 Sugar transport protein 8
Os.45939.1.S1_at 8.66E‐03 1.81 2.24E‐02 1.65 LOC_Os01g04190 Arabinose‐proton symporter
Os.45939.1.S1_x_at 2.72E‐02 1.55 7.65E‐02 1.40 LOC_Os01g04190 Arabinose‐proton symporter
Os.6624.1.S1_s_at 2.96E‐02 1.60 6.09E‐02 1.49 LOC_Os01g04190 arabinose‐proton symporter
Os.27138.1.S1_at 2.32E‐02 1.81 2.28E‐01 1.36 LOC_Os10g21590 Carbohydrate transporter/sugar porter
Os.54757.1.S1_at 3.41E‐02 1.71 1.11E‐01 1.49 LOC_Os03g05610 Inorganic phosphate transporter 1‐2
Os.50503.1.S1_at 2.47E‐02 1.70 7.45E‐02 1.51 LOC_Os03g04360 Inorganic phosphate transporter 1‐7
OsAffx.30403.1.S1_at 1.65E‐02 2.16 2.33E‐01 1.47 LOC_Os03g03680 Major facilitator superfamily protein
OsAffx.30403.1.S1_s_at 3.49E‐02 1.91 4.03E‐01 1.30 LOC_Os03g03680 Major facilitator superfamily protein
Os.53018.2.S1_x_at 3.65E‐03 1.73 1.46E‐02 1.53 LOC_Os04g43210 Proton myo‐inositol cotransporter
Os.31838.1.S1_at 2.10E‐02 1.79 6.71E‐02 1.57 LOC_Os03g24870 Solute carrier family 2, facilitated glucose transporter member 8
Os.26932.1.S1_at 1.38E‐02 1.88 3.65E‐01 1.25 LOC_Os07g37320 Sugar carrier protein C
Os.27613.1.A1_at 1.77E‐02 1.74 1.81E‐02 1.74 LOC_Os05g07870 Triose phosphate/phosphate translocator
Os.4704.1.S1_at 6.41E‐02 1.49 5.61E‐02 1.51 LOC_Os03g07480 Sucrose Transporter
Os.45486.1.S1_x_at 4.19E‐02 1.82 9.03E‐02 1.64 LOC_Os01g03144 ABC‐2 type transporter family protein
Os.46480.1.S1_at 4.86E‐02 1.65 1.97E‐01 1.38 LOC_Os10g35180 ATP‐binding cassette sub‐family G member 2
Os.11454.2.S1_at 3.22E‐02 1.58 9.25E‐02 1.42 LOC_Os01g34970 Multidrug resistance protein 8
Os.33212.2.S1_at 2.13E‐02 1.53 9.72E‐02 1.34 LOC_Os01g67580 Multidrug resistance‐associated protein 9
Os.51901.1.S1_at 7.71E‐03 1.91 2.19E‐02 1.71 LOC_Os02g21750 Multidrug resistance protein 4
Os.409.1.S1_at 5.28E‐03 1.58 2.32E‐02 1.41 LOC_Os07g15460 Metal transporter Nramp6
Os.25771.1.S1_at 1.70E‐02 1.68 1.88E‐02 1.67 LOC_Os01g65000 Ammonium transporter 2
Os.2678.1.S1_at 3.94E‐02 1.61 5.11E‐01 1.16 LOC_Os02g13870 Aquaporin NIP1.2
OsAffx.22646.1.S1_at 4.66E‐02 1.63 4.84E‐02 1.62 LOC_Os03g61290 ATCHX19
OsAffx.26700.2.S1_at 5.33E‐04 1.89 3.47E‐04 1.96 LOC_Os05g02870 ATPase, coupled to transmembrane movement of substances
OsAffx.26700.2.S1_x_at 3.42E‐04 1.86 2.07E‐04 1.94 LOC_Os05g02870 ATPase, coupled to transmembrane movement of substances
Os.46553.1.S1_at 4.92E‐02 1.73 7.97E‐02 1.62 LOC_Os10g13830 ATPase, coupled to transmembrane movement of substances
Os.46553.2.S1_x_at 3.69E‐02 1.76 4.96E‐02 1.70 LOC_Os10g13830 ATPase, coupled to transmembrane movement of substances
Os.24908.1.S1_at 1.06E‐02 1.83 3.31E‐02 1.63 LOC_Os08g39950 Potassium transporter 17
Os.25736.1.S1_at 4.22E‐02 1.58 2.57E‐01 1.28 LOC_Os09g31486 Heat shock 70 kDa protein, Mitochondrial precursor
Os.38164.1.S1_at 4.57E‐02 1.64 1.63E‐01 1.40 LOC_Os12g38180 heat shock cognate 70 kDa protein 2
Anther development
Os.49681.1.S1_at 3.60E‐02 1.65 2.62E‐01 1.30 LOC_Os03g07140 Male sterility protein 2, DPW
Os.18429.1.S1_x_at 4.16E‐02 1.61 2.97E‐01 1.27 LOC_Os01g63580 Glycerol‐3‐phosphate acyltransferase 8
Os.49822.1.S1_at 1.51E‐02 1.75 2.75E‐02 1.64 LOC_Os06g11970 MADS‐box protein AGL66; MADS63
Os.53212.1.S1_at 1.20E‐02 1.70 4.93E‐02 1.48 LOC_Os04g21660 26S protease regulatory subunit 6A
Os.46480.1.S1_at 4.86E‐02 1.65 1.97E‐01 1.38 LOC_Os10g35180 ATP‐binding cassette subfamily G member 2
Os.20530.1.S1_at 2.01E‐02 1.59 2.19E‐01 1.26 LOC_Os08g44530 Dihydroxy‐acid dehydratase
Os.41468.1.S1_at 1.17E‐02 2.01 7.91E‐02 1.60 LOC_Os01g47050 Kelch motif family protein
Os.46553.1.S1_at 4.92E‐02 1.73 7.97E‐02 1.62 LOC_Os10g13830 ATPase, coupled to transmembrane movement of substances
Os.46553.2.S1_x_at 3.69E‐02 1.76 4.96E‐02 1.70 LOC_Os10g13830 ATPase, coupled to transmembrane movement of substances
OsAffx.12789.1.S1_s_at 9.09E‐03 2.35 8.85E‐02 1.72 LOC_Os03g08754 MADS‐box transcription factor 47
Os.50337.1.S1_at 4.43E‐02 2.12 5.41E‐01 1.29 LOC_Os04g33720 Beta‐fructofuranosidase, insoluble isoenzyme 3 precursor
Os.33948.1.S1_at 4.50E‐02 1.69 2.89E‐01 1.32 LOC_Os04g41110 N terminus of Rad21‐/Rec8‐like protein
Open in a new tab

There were 15 genes selected for real‐time RT‐PCR validation (shown in Figure 5) based on the functional enrichment analysis of differentially expressed genes. Additional biological replicate anther samples were collected for real‐time RT‐PCR validation, and more than 90% of the tested genes confirmed the GeneChip results, especially for the seven sugar transporter genes (Figure 5). Compared to the GeneChip data, the fold change of genes analysed by real‐time RT‐PCR was not exactly same, but the change trends were similar.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Real‐time RT‐PCR validation for selected probe sets in anthers. The probe sets were selected for real‐time RT‐PCR to validate the expression patterns among Ubi::OsSPX1‐sense transgenic line (red bar), WT (grey bar) and Ubi::OsSPX1‐antisense transgenic line (blue bar), the error bars represent the standard deviations of three replicates. The transcripts are as follows (the primers for each probe set are listed in Table S2): OsSPX1—LOC_Os06g40120; IDS4‐like protein; SPX domain containing protein; WRKY46—LOC_Os12g02440; WRKY transcription factor 46; DGD1—LOC_Os04g34000; digalactosyldiacylglycerol synthase 1; mannitol TP—LOC_Os10g21590; carbohydrate transporter/sugar porter; sugar TP—LOC_Os07g10590; sugar transport protein 8; CUE1—LOC_Os05g07870; triose phosphate/phosphate translocator; ATINT4—LOC_Os04g43210; proton myo‐inositol cotransporter; glucose TP—LOC_Os03g24870; solute carrier family 2, facilitated glucose transporter member 8; SUT2—LOC_Os03g07480; sucrose transporter; GLT1—LOC_Os01g04190; arabinose‐proton symporter; OsSPX3—LOC_Os10g25310; SPX domain containing protein; AP1—LOC_Os07g01820; MADS‐box transcription factor 15; JAZ—LOC_Os07g42370; pnFL‐2; F‐box—LOC_Os10g41838; F‐box protein interaction domain containing protein; NPR1—LOC_Os01g09800; regulatory protein NPR1; BTBA1—Bric‐a‐Brac, Tramtrack, Broad Complex BTB domain with Ankyrin repeat region.

Discussion

Phosphorus is one of the major mineral nutrients for plant growth and development. Rice plants can accumulate abundant Pi in vegetative organs such as leaves at the early developmental stage and transport the Pi stored in the leaves to reproductive organs such as panicle at the late developmental stage. OsSPX1 is involved in the Pi‐signalling network related to OsPHR2 and OsPHO2. OsPHR2‐Ov1 transgenic line showed disordered male reproductive organs. The ltn1 (OsPHO2) mutant had significantly reduced tiller number and fertility compared to WT. We studied the potential function of OsSPX1 during rice reproductive phase, and discovered that the OsSPX1 antisense transgenic rice lines had lower seed‐setting rate. Thus, we further investigated the anther and pollen development of the transgenic and wild‐type plants and found that the pollen fertility was affected by antisense of OsSPX1 gene, possibly through influence on pollen fertility. We conducted rice whole‐genome GeneChip analysis to compare the gene expression profiling between wild‐type and transgenic rice lines. GO and GeneBins analysis results showed that the down‐regulated genes in the OsSPX1 antisense lines were significantly enriched in the following biological processes, including starch and sucrose metabolism, carbohydrate metabolism and sugar transport, anther development, cell cycle, etc.

During the pollen maturation, starch and lipids accumulate and the supply of photosynthetic assimilates (including sugar and lipids) from source organs is required (Goetz et al., 2001). In the functional enrichment analysis for the probe sets that had significantly lower expression in Ubi::OsSPX1‐antisense transgenic line A1, GeneBins, MapMan and GO analyses all highlighted the sucrose and starch metabolism and sugar transporter categories. Starch biosynthesis is critical during pollen maturation and sterile pollen are normally starch deficient (Datta et al., 2002). In maize, several key sugar metabolic genes were lower expressed in late pollen stage of CMS male‐sterile genotype than that of male‐fertile genotypes, including SPP (sucrose 6‐phosphate phosphohydrolase), IVR (invertase), HXK (Hexokinase), hexose transporter, etc. (Datta et al., 2002). In our results, two HXK genes (LOC_Os05g09500 and LOC_Os05g3111) and one SPP homolog (LOC_Os05g05270) were significantly lower expressed in Ubi::OsSPX1‐antisense transgenic line A1 (Table 1). Moreover, a dozen of sugar transporter genes were also lower expressed in this line (Table 1). Expression patterns of seven sugar transporter genes were validated by real‐time RT‐PCR (Figure 5). For example, LOC_Os10g21590, a carbohydrate transporter/sugar porter gene has its Arabidopsis homologs, AtPMT1 and AtPMT2 more highly expressed in mature or germinating pollen grains, as well as in growing pollen tubes (Klepek et al., 2010). Analyses of reporter genes performed with promoter sequences showed expression in hydathodes and young xylem cells (both genes). For another gene of a sugar transport protein, LOC_Os07g10590 – of, its Arabidopsis homologs, AtSTP6 was only expressed during the late stages of pollen (Scholz‐Starke et al., 2003) and AtSTP9 was specifically expressed in the male gametophyte (Schneidereit et al., 2003). In addition, several ABCG (ATP‐binding cassette transporter) genes were lower expressed in line A1 (Table 1), including LOC_Os10g13830, homolog of Arabidopsis ABCG31. It was reported that the many pollen grains in double mutant abcg9/abcg31 were shrivelled up and collapsed when exposure to dry air (Schneidereit et al., 2003). These results indicate that antisense of OsSPX1, possibly through regulation of phosphate homoeostasis, affects the expression levels of some key genes related to carbohydrate metabolism and sugar transport, and then influences the transport of nutrients from source organs like flag leaves to sink organs like anthers.

Many genes were reported to be related to anther and pollen development both in rice and Arabidopsis (Wilson and Zhang, 2009). For example, both rice and Arabidopsis MIKC* type MADS‐box genes showed conserved expression in the gametophyte, while OsMADS62, OsMADS63 and OsMADS68 were all specifically expressed late in pollen development (Liu et al., 2013). In our result, the OsMADS63 (LOC_Os06g11970) was significantly lower expressed in Ubi::OsSPX1‐antisense transgenic line A1 (Table 1). Another male sterility gene, DPW (LOC_Os03g07140), was also lower expressed in line A1. The mutant dpw was reported to show defective anther development and degenerated pollen grains (Shi et al., 2011).

Cell cycle process also plays an important role in the male gametophyte development (McCormick, 2004). The SPX protein in yeast, Pho81, is involved cyclin–cdk complex as a CDK inhibitor (Lee et al., 2000; Lenburg and O'Shea, 1996). There were several cyclin genes significantly lower expressed in Ubi::OsSPX1‐antisense transgenic line A1, including members of cyclins A, B and D, as well as some important regulator genes (Table S3). For example, in the transgenic RNAi rice lines of LOC_Os02g40450, reduced expression level of the ROCK‐N‐ROLLERS gene resulted in reduced fertility with partially sterile flowers and defective pollens (Chang et al., 2009). These data might indicate a connection between Pi starvation and cell cycle process, and their roles in male gametophyte development.

In addition, some phenylalanine metabolism pathway genes were affected by down‐regulation of OsSPX1 and were highly expressed in line A1, including phenylalanine ammonia‐lyase (PAL), peroxidise, tropinone reductase, etc. (Table S3). Phenylalanine metabolism pathway is involved in the pollen development process. The transition of phenylpropanoids to flavonoids is considered as essential condition for viable pollen (Wiermann, 1970) and the PAL in tapetum cells of anthers might play an important role in pollen development (Kehrel and Wiermann, 1985). The activity of PAL protein was related to the number of fertile pollen grains at the flowering stage of broccoli (Kishitani et al., 1993).

In brief, we discovered a novel role of OsSPX1 in rice pollen fertility and grain yield using the OsSPX1 antisense and sense transgenic rice lines. Our results showed that antisense of OsSPX1 caused rice semi‐male sterility and lower seed‐setting rate. We further conducted rice whole‐genome GeneChip analysis to elucidate the possible molecular mechanism and found that the enriched functional groups related to starch and sucrose metabolism, sugar porter, cell cycle, anther development, phenylalanine metabolism pathway, etc. Several genes related to male sterility and male gametophyte development were also lower expressed in Ubi::OsSPX1‐antisense transgenic lines, such as DPW and ROCK‐N‐ROLLERS. These results may help us to understand the possible novel functions of OsSPX1 involved in rice reproductive development and grain yield.

Experimental procedures

Plant materials

Seeds of rice (Nipponbare as WT, and Ubi::OsSPX1‐antisense and Ubi::OsSPX1‐sense transgenic lines) were surface‐sterilized in 5% (w/v) sodium hypochlorite for 20 min and then washed in distilled water three or four times, then germinated in water for 2 day at room temperature and 1 day at 37 °C. The seedlings were planted in the paddy fields during the growing season in Beijing, China.

For phenotype evaluation: The spikelets of rice (Nipponbare as WT, and Ubi::OsSPX1‐antisense and Ubi::OsSPX1‐sense transgenic lines) were randomly collected at heading stage.

For RNA isolation: Anther samples were harvested from rice plants during heading stage under natural conditions in the paddy fields.

Characterization of anther and pollen phenotypes

Anthers of the sampled flowers were dissected and immersed in Alexander's solution (Alexander, 1969). Stained pollen grains were released from anthers and observed under light microscopy (Zeiss, A1, Thuringia, Germany). For SEM, fresh anthers were coated with palladium‐gold in a sputter coater (Hummer), then observed and photographed by Hitachi S‐3400N scanning electron microscope (Hitachi, Japan). For TEM observation, the anthers were fixed in formaldehyde acetic acid using standard plastic sections and Hitachi JEM‐1230 (HC) transmission electron microscope (Hitachi, Japan) was used.

RNA isolation and real‐time RT‐PCR

All anther and flag leaf samples from transgenic lines and WT were homogenized in liquid nitrogen before isolation of the RNA. Total RNA was isolated using TRIZOL® reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and purified using Qiagen RNeasy columns (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Reverse transcription was performed using Moloney murine leukaemia virus (M‐MLV; Invitrogen). We heated 10 μL samples containing 2 μg of total RNA, and 20 pmol of random hexamers (Invitrogen) at 70 °C for 2 min to denature the RNA and then chilled the samples on ice for 2 min. We added reaction buffer and M‐MLV to a total volume of 20 μL containing 500 μm dNTPs, 50 mm Tris–HCl (pH 8.3), 75 mm KCl, 3 mm MgCl2, 5 mm dithiothreitol, 200 units of M‐MLV and 20 pmol random hexamers. The samples were then heated at 42 °C for 1.5 h. The cDNA samples were diluted to 8 ng/μL for real‐time RT‐PCR analysis.

For real‐time RT‐PCR, triplicate quantitative assays were performed on 1 μL of each cDNA dilution using the SYBR Green Master Mix (PN 4309155; Applied Biosystems) with an ABI 7900 sequence detection system according to the manufacture's protocol (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA). The gene‐specific primers were designed using PRIMER3 (http://frodo.wi.mit.edu/primer3/input.htm). The amplification of 18S rRNA was used as an internal control to normalize all data (forward primer, 5′‐CGGCTACCACATCCAAGGAA‐3′; reverse primer, 5′‐ TGTCACTACCTCCCCGTGTCA‐3′). Gene‐specific primers were listed in Table S2. The relative quantification method (ΔΔCT) was used to evaluate quantitative variation between replicates examined.

Affymetrix GeneChip analysis

For each sample, 8 μg of total RNA was used for making biotin‐labelled cRNA targets. All the processes about cDNA and cRNA synthesis, cRNA fragmentation, hybridization, washing and staining, and scanning followed the GeneChip Standard Protocol (Eukaryotic Target Preparation). In this experiment, Poly‐A RNA Control Kit and the One‐Cycle cDNA Synthesis kit were applied. Affymetrix GCOS software was used to do data normalization and comparative analysis.

In order to map the probe set ID to the locus ID in the rice genome, the consensus sequence of each probe set was compared by BLAST (Basic Local Alignment and Search Tool) against the TIGR Rice Genome version 5. The cut‐off e‐value was set as 1e–20. The singular enrichment analysis (SEA) tool in agriGO (Du et al., 2010) was applied for functional enrichment analysis of selected gene list, with the default parameters for Affymetrix Rice Genome Array. The functional enrichment analysis result was presented by REVIGO (Supek et al., 2011) tool with its default parameter for Oryza sativa GO term background. The gene function categorization was based on the functional classification BINs of Oryza sativa from MapMan (Thimm et al., 2004) and GeneBins (Goffard and Weiller, 2007).

Supporting information

Figure S1 Real‐time RT‐PCR validation of transgenic rice lines.

PBI-14-1661-s004.jpg (853.7KB, jpg)

Figure S2 Comparison of seed setting rate of Ubi::OsSPX1‐antisense transgenic lines, Ubi::OsSPX1‐sense transgenic lines and the WT rice in paddy fields.

PBI-14-1661-s003.jpg (424.5KB, jpg)

Table S1 2403 probe sets showing differential expression in anthers among Ubi::OsSPX1‐sense transgenic line, WT, and Ubi::OsSPX1‐antisense transgenic lines.

PBI-14-1661-s002.xls (966KB, xls)

Table S2 Primer list of probe sets for real‐time RT‐PCR.

PBI-14-1661-s005.doc (38.5KB, doc)

Table S3 Selected differentially expressed probe sets related to cell cycle, chitinase, and phenylalanine metabolism.

PBI-14-1661-s001.doc (175KB, doc)

Acknowledgements

We thank Qunlian Zhang for rice breeding; we thank Liqin Wei, Junzhen Jia, Haihong Liu and Yan Liang for their technical support with microscopy; we also thank Hong Yan for support on GeneChip experiment. This work was supported by grants from the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (31371291 and 2013CBA01402). The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Alexander, M.P. (1969) Differential staining of aborted and nonaborted pollen. Stain Technol. 44, 117–122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chang, L. , Ma, H. and Xue, H.W. (2009) Functional conservation of the meiotic genes SDS and RCK in male meiosis in the monocot rice. Cell Res. 19, 768–782. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chen, R. , Zhao, X. , Shao, Z. , Wei, Z. , Wang, Y. , Zhu, L. , Zhao, J. et al. (2007) Rice UDP‐glucose pyrophosphorylase1 is essential for pollen callose deposition and its cosuppression results in a new type of thermosensitive genic male sterility. Plant Cell, 19, 847–861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ciereszko, I. , Johansson, H. , Hurry, V. and Kleczkowski, L.A. (2001) Phosphate status affects the gene expression, protein content and enzymatic activity of UDP‐glucose pyrophosphorylase in wild‐type and pho mutants of Arabidopsis. Planta, 212, 598–605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Datta, R. , Chamusco, K.C. and Chourey, P.S. (2002) Starch biosynthesis during pollen maturation is associated with altered patterns of gene expression in maize. Plant Physiol. 130, 1645–1656. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Du, Z. , Zhou, X. , Ling, Y. , Zhang, Z. and Su, Z. (2010) agriGO: a GO analysis toolkit for the agricultural community. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, W64–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Duan, K. , Yi, K. , Dang, L. , Huang, H. , Wu, W. and Wu, P. (2008) Characterization of a sub‐family of Arabidopsis genes with the SPX domain reveals their diverse functions in plant tolerance to phosphorus starvation. Plant J. 54, 965–975. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Flugge, U.‐L. (1995) Phosphate translocation in the regulation of photosynthesis. J. Exp. Bot. 46, 1317–1323. [Google Scholar]
  9. Goetz, M. , Godt, D.E. , Guivarc'h, A. , Kahmann, U. , Chriqui, D. and Roitsch, T. (2001) Induction of male sterility in plants by metabolic engineering of the carbohydrate supply. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 98, 6522–6527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Goffard, N. and Weiller, G. (2007) GeneBins: a database for classifying gene expression data, with application to plant genome arrays. BMC Bioinformatics, 8, 87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hamburger, D. , Rezzonico, E. , MacDonald‐Comber Petetot, J. , Somerville, C. and Poirier, Y. (2002) Identification and characterization of the Arabidopsis PHO1 gene involved in phosphate loading to the xylem. Plant Cell, 14, 889–902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hu, B. , Zhu, C. , Li, F. , Tang, J. , Wang, Y. , Lin, A. , Liu, L. et al. (2011) LEAF TIP NECROSIS1 plays a pivotal role in the regulation of multiple phosphate starvation responses in rice. Plant Physiol. 156, 1101–1115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Jia, H. , Ren, H. , Gu, M. , Zhao, J. , Sun, S. , Zhang, X. , Chen, J. et al. (2011) The phosphate transporter gene OsPht1;8 is involved in phosphate homeostasis in rice. Plant Physiol. 156, 1164–1175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kang, X. and Ni, M. (2006) Arabidopsis SHORT HYPOCOTYL UNDER BLUE1 contains SPX and EXS domains and acts in cryptochrome signaling. Plant Cell, 18, 921–934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kehrel, B. and Wiermann, R. (1985) Immunochemical localization of phenylalanine ammonia‐lyase and chalcone synthase in anthers. Planta, 163, 183–190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kishitani, S. , Yomoda, A. , Konno, N. and Tanaka, Y. (1993) Involvement of phenylalanine ammonia‐lyase in the development of pollen in broccoli (Brassica oleracea L.). Sex. Plant Reprod. 6, 244–248. [Google Scholar]
  17. Klepek, Y.S. , Volke, M. , Konrad, K.R. , Wippel, K. , Hoth, S. , Hedrich, R. and Sauer, N. (2010) Arabidopsis thaliana POLYOL/MONOSACCHARIDE TRANSPORTERS 1 and 2: fructose and xylitol/H+ symporters in pollen and young xylem cells. J. Exp. Bot. 61, 537–550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lee, M. , O'Regan, S. , Moreau, J.L. , Johnson, A.L. , Johnston, L.H. and Goding, C.R. (2000) Regulation of the Pcl7‐Pho85 cyclin‐cdk complex by Pho81. Mol. Microbiol. 38, 411–422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lenburg, M.E. and O'Shea, E.K. (1996) Signaling phosphate starvation. Trends Biochem. Sci. 21, 383–387. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Li, N. , Zhang, D.S. , Liu, H.S. , Yin, C.S. , Li, X.X. , Liang, W.Q. , Yuan, Z. et al. (2006) The rice tapetum degeneration retardation gene is required for tapetum degradation and anther development. Plant Cell, 18, 2999–3014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Liu, F. , Wang, Z. , Ren, H. , Shen, C. , Li, Y. , Ling, H.Q. , Wu, C. et al. (2010) OsSPX1 suppresses the function of OsPHR2 in the regulation of expression of OsPT2 and phosphate homeostasis in shoots of rice. Plant J. 62, 508–517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Liu, Y. , Cui, S. , Wu, F. , Yan, S. , Lin, X. , Du, X. , Chong, K. et al. (2013) Functional conservation of MIKC*‐Type MADS box genes in Arabidopsis and rice pollen maturation. Plant Cell, 25, 1288–1303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Lv, Q. , Zhong, Y. , Wang, Y. , Wang, Z. , Zhang, L. , Shi, J. , Wu, Z. et al. (2014) SPX4 Negatively regulates phosphate signaling and homeostasis through its interaction with PHR2 in rice. Plant Cell, 26, 1586–1597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Marschner, H. (1995) Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants. London: ACADEMIC PRESS Harcourt Brace & Company, Publishers. [Google Scholar]
  25. McCormick, S. (2004) Control of male gametophyte development. Plant Cell, 16 (Suppl.), S142–S153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Mu, H. , Ke, J. , Liu, W. , Zhuang, C. and Yip, W. (2009) UDP‐glucose pyrophosphorylase2 (OsUgp2), a pollen‐preferential gene in rice, plays a critical role in starch accumulation during pollen maturation. Chin. Sci. Bull. 54, 234–243. [Google Scholar]
  27. Pieters, A.J. , Paul, M.J. and Lawlor, D.W. (2001) Low sink demand limits photosynthesis under P(i) deficiency. J. Exp. Bot. 52, 1083–1091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Puga, M.I. , Mateos, I. , Charukesi, R. , Wang, Z. , Franco‐Zorrilla, J.M. , de Lorenzo, L. , Irigoyen, M.L. et al. (2014) SPX1 is a phosphate‐dependent inhibitor of Phosphate Starvation Response 1 in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 111, 14947–14952. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Rao, I. (1996) Role of phosphorus in photosynthesis. In Handbook of Photosynthesis. ( Pessarakli, M. , ed), pp. 173–193. New York: Marcel Dekker. [Google Scholar]
  30. Schneidereit, A. , Scholz‐Starke, J. and Buttner, M. (2003) Functional characterization and expression analyses of the glucose‐specific AtSTP9 monosaccharide transporter in pollen of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 133, 182–190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Scholz‐Starke, J. , Buttner, M. and Sauer, N. (2003) AtSTP6, a new pollen‐specific H+‐monosaccharide symporter from Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 131, 70–77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Shi, J. , Tan, H. , Yu, X.H. , Liu, Y. , Liang, W. , Ranathunge, K. , Franke, R.B. et al. (2011) Defective pollen wall is required for anther and microspore development in rice and encodes a fatty acyl carrier protein reductase. Plant Cell, 23, 2225–2246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Shi, J. , Hu, H. , Zhang, K. , Zhang, W. , Yu, Y. , Wu, Z. and Wu, P. (2014) The paralogous SPX3 and SPX5 genes redundantly modulate Pi homeostasis in rice. J. Exp. Bot. 65, 859–870. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Stefanovic, A. , Ribot, C. , Rouached, H. , Wang, Y. , Chong, J. , Belbahri, L. , Delessert, S. et al. (2007) Members of the PHO1 gene family show limited functional redundancy in phosphate transfer to the shoot, and are regulated by phosphate deficiency via distinct pathways. Plant J. 50, 982–994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Supek, F. , Bosnjak, M. , Skunca, N. and Smuc, T. (2011) REVIGO summarizes and visualizes long lists of gene ontology terms. PLoS One, 6, e21800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Thimm, O. , Blasing, O. , Gibon, Y. , Nagel, A. , Meyer, S. , Kruger, P. , Selbig, J. et al. (2004) MAPMAN: a user‐driven tool to display genomics data sets onto diagrams of metabolic pathways and other biological processes. Plant J. 37, 914–939. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Wang, Y. , Ribot, C. , Rezzonico, E. and Poirier, Y. (2004) Structure and expression profile of the Arabidopsis PHO1 gene family indicates a broad role in inorganic phosphate homeostasis. Plant Physiol. 135, 400–411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Wang, Y. , Secco, D. and Poirier, Y. (2008) Characterization of the PHO1 gene family and the responses to phosphate deficiency of Physcomitrella patens. Plant Physiol. 146, 646–656. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Wang, C. , Wei, Q. , Zhang, K. , Wang, L. , Liu, F. , Zhao, L. , Tan, Y. et al. (2013) Down‐regulation of OsSPX1 causes high sensitivity to cold and oxidative stresses in rice seedlings. PLoS One, 8, e81849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Wang, Z. , Ruan, W. , Shi, J. , Zhang, L. , Xiang, D. , Yang, C. , Li, C. et al. (2014) Rice SPX1 and SPX2 inhibit phosphate starvation responses through interacting with PHR2 in a phosphate‐dependent manner. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 111, 14953–14958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Wiermann, R. (1970) Synthesis of phenylpropanes during pollen development. Planta. 95, 133–145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Wilson, Z.A. and Zhang, D.B. (2009) From Arabidopsis to rice: pathways in pollen development. J. Exp. Bot. 60, 1479–1492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Wu, H.M. and Cheun, A.Y. (2000) Programmed cell death in plant reproduction. Plant Mol. Biol. 44, 267–281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Xu, J. , Yang, C. , Yuan, Z. , Zhang, D. , Gondwe, M.Y. , Ding, Z. , Liang, W. et al. (2010) The ABORTED MICROSPORES regulatory network is required for postmeiotic male reproductive development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell, 22, 91–107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Zhang, H. , Liang, W. , Yang, X. , Luo, X. , Jiang, N. , Ma, H. and Zhang, D. (2010) Carbon starved anther encodes a MYB domain protein that regulates sugar partitioning required for rice pollen development. Plant Cell, 22, 672–689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Zhang, D. , Luo, X. and Zhu, L. (2011) Cytological analysis and genetic control of rice anther development. J. Genet. Genomics, 38, 379–390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Zhao, L. , Liu, F. , Xu, W. , Di, C. , Zhou, S. , Xue, Y. , Yu, J. et al. (2009) Increased expression of OsSPX1 enhances cold/subfreezing tolerance in tobacco and Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Biotechnol. J. 7, 550–561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Zhou, Y. and Ni, M. (2009) SHB1 plays dual roles in photoperiodic and autonomous flowering. Dev. Biol. 331, 50–57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Zhou, Y. and Ni, M. (2010) SHORT HYPOCOTYL UNDER BLUE1 truncations and mutations alter its association with a signaling protein complex in Arabidopsis. Plant cell, 22, 703–715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Zhou, J. , Jiao, F. , Wu, Z. , Li, Y. , Wang, X. , He, X. , Zhong, W. et al. (2008) OsPHR2 is involved in phosphate‐starvation signaling and excessive phosphate accumulation in shoots of plants. Plant Physiol. 146, 1673–1686. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Zhou, Y. , Zhang, X. , Kang, X. , Zhao, X. , Zhang, X. and Ni, M. (2009) SHORT HYPOCOTYL UNDER BLUE1 associates with MINISEED3 and HAIKU2 promoters in vivo to regulate Arabidopsis seed development. Plant cell, 21, 106–117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Figure S1 Real‐time RT‐PCR validation of transgenic rice lines.

PBI-14-1661-s004.jpg (853.7KB, jpg)

Figure S2 Comparison of seed setting rate of Ubi::OsSPX1‐antisense transgenic lines, Ubi::OsSPX1‐sense transgenic lines and the WT rice in paddy fields.

PBI-14-1661-s003.jpg (424.5KB, jpg)

Table S1 2403 probe sets showing differential expression in anthers among Ubi::OsSPX1‐sense transgenic line, WT, and Ubi::OsSPX1‐antisense transgenic lines.

PBI-14-1661-s002.xls (966KB, xls)

Table S2 Primer list of probe sets for real‐time RT‐PCR.

PBI-14-1661-s005.doc (38.5KB, doc)

Table S3 Selected differentially expressed probe sets related to cell cycle, chitinase, and phenylalanine metabolism.

PBI-14-1661-s001.doc (175KB, doc)

Articles from Plant Biotechnology Journal are provided here courtesy of Society for Experimental Biology (SEB) and the Association of Applied Biologists (AAB) and John Wiley and Sons, Ltd

RESOURCES