Abstract
The prevalence of obesity among Italian children has reached such alarming levels as to require detailed studies of the causes of the phenomenon. A cross-sectional study was carried out in order to assess the weight status of 1164 Italian children aged 6–8 years (the Monitoring Air Pollution Effects on Children for Supporting Public Health Policy (MAPEC_LIFE) cohort) and to identify any associations between selected socio-economic and environmental factors and overweight/obesity. The data were obtained by means of a questionnaire given to parents, and any associations were examined by binomial logistic regression analyses. Overweight was found to be positively associated with male gender, parents of non-Italian origin, and parents who smoke, and negatively associated with the parents’ level of education and employment. In addition, the frequency of overweight varied in relation to the geographical area of residence, with a greater prevalence of overweight children in the cities of central-southern Italy. This study highlights the need to implement appropriate obesity prevention programs in Italy, which should include educational measures concerning lifestyle for parents from the earliest stages of their child’s life.
Keywords: body weight, overweight, obesity, children, socio-economic factors, MAPEC_LIFE study
1. Introduction
Obesity, as declared by World Health Organization (WHO) [1], is one of the most serious public health concerns in the world. It has become a global epidemic, increasing constantly in both industrialised and developing countries [2,3]. Obesity is a condition characterised by abnormal fat accumulation in adipose tissue that results in an excess of body weight and significant impairment of health, including hypertension, hyperlipidaemia, coronary heart disease, ischemic stroke, diabetes mellitus type 2, certain types of cancer, osteoporosis, and psychosocial problems [1].
The data show that excess weight affects both adults and children [4]. The first global report published in 2004 by the International Obesity Task Force (IOTF) estimated that, globally, about 155 million young people aged 5–17 years (10%) were overweight, of which 30–45 million (2%–3%) were obese [5]. Subsequently, in the WHO European Region, it was estimated that about 20% of children and adolescents were overweight, a third of whom could be classified as obese [6], while among 6–9-year-old children, 10.8% to 45.1% of boys and 15.1% to 42.3% of girls were overweight, of whom 2.8% to 14.7% of boys and 3.5% to 14.6% of girls were classified as obese [7]. More recent data [8,9] show that the prevalence of overweight in children is increasing in developing countries, but has seen a plateau or a slight decline in higher income countries. However, the problem continues to be of concern, especially in certain Mediterranean countries. Specifically, together with Spain and Greece, Italy is among the most heavily affected countries. In 2014, 30.7% of Italian children aged 8–9 were overweight, 9.8% of whom were obese, with a higher prevalence in Central and Southern regions [10].
Obesity is the consequence of a long-term imbalance between energy intake and energy expenditure, determined by food consumption and physical activity and influenced by biological and environmental factors [11]. Potential risk factors for obesity in early life include genetic factors, lifestyle, and physical, health, and environmental conditions [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20], which can all in turn be influenced by the family context and socio-economic factors [19,21,22].
These factors affect energy balance on various levels and may interact with each other. To a certain extent, the specific causal pathways involved thus remain unclear and may differ depending on the geographical areas involved.
Given its short-term [23] and long-term consequences [23,24], as well as its relative economic burden [4,25], overweight and obesity should be prevented as early as possible. For effective intervention, it is important to identify major determinants at an early stage of life.
In Italy, despite the presence of an effective surveillance network monitoring the weight status of children aged 8–9 throughout the country [10], there are very few studies of the factors responsible for overweight and obesity in school-age children.
The aim of this study was to: (a) assess the weight status of a cohort of Italian children aged 6–8 years based on self-reported anthropometric data; and (b) to identify any associations between selected socio-economic and environmental factors and overweight/obesity.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. The Monitoring Air Pollution Effects on Children for Supporting Public Health Policy (MAPEC_LIFE) Project
The study cohort is the one selected for the MAPEC_LIFE project (LIFE12 ENV/IT/000614), a multicenter cohort study funded by the European Union’s LIFE+ Programme. It aims to assess the association between concentrations of certain atmospheric pollutants and early DNA damage in children aged 6–8 living in areas with varying levels of air pollution, and to build a model for the estimation of global genotoxic risk that can be used to support public health policy [26].
In order to accurately correlate biological effects with airborne pollutants, the parents of children participating in the MAPEC_LIFE study were asked to fill in a questionnaire to assess the children’s characteristics, including weight status and lifestyle, as well as any exposure factors linked to the home context that could have a confounding effect on the measured responses [27].
2.2. Recruitment of Children and Questionnaire Administration
The study was conducted on randomly recruited children attending primary school in five Italian cities: Brescia, Lecce, Perugia, Pisa, and Torino.
Selection of the schools and recruitment of children were conducted in accordance with a protocol [26] shared by the Research Units working in the five cities of the study: the Universities of Brescia, Salento (Lecce), Perugia, Pisa, and Torino. Classes in the first three years of eighteen schools based in 26 locations were involved. Participation in the study was voluntary, after inviting the parents of all children attending these classes. After obtaining the written consent of the parents, children meeting the following inclusion criteria were enrolled: age not below six years or above nine; residence in the cities involved in the study; absence of serious illness, absence of exposure to radiotherapy or chemotherapy in the 12 months preceding the investigation; absence of exposure to radiographic testing in the month preceding the investigation; no use of dental braces.
The data was gathered from October 2014 to March 2015 by means of a previously validated questionnaire [28] compiled by the parents. The questionnaire was composed of 148 questions, subdivided into various sections: the child’s personal information, weight and height, and health status; the characteristics of the child’s home, traffic near the school, and information on the child’s lifestyle, parents’ characteristics, and eating habits. The study cohort was composed of all children whose parents completed valid questionnaires. In total, 1164 children (3.1% of the total children aged 6–8 years living in the cities involved in the study) were enrolled.
2.3. Data Processing and Statistical Analysis
The data for weight and height were used to calculate the children’s body mass index (BMI), as the weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in metres (kg/m2). This was used in turn to assess whether the child was underweight (UW), of normal weight (NW), overweight (OW) or obese (OB). In accordance with the indications of the IOTF, OW and OB are defined with reference to the BMI threshold values for boys and girls aged 2–18 years, calculated by Cole et al. [29] on the basis of adult values (overweight = 25 kg/m2; obesity = 30 kg/m2). The cut-off for the UW category was set at the “−2 z-score” on the basis of the BMI threshold values set out in Cole et al. [30].
Subsequently, the number of children belonging to each weight category was calculated with reference to the following personal, socio-economic, and environmental variables indicated by the parents in the questionnaires:
Personal data: age, gender, child’s nation of birth (Italy or outside Italy), city of residence;
Information on the parents: nation of birth (Italy or outside Italy), level of education (degree or high-school leaving certificate/lower qualification), employment status (employed or unemployed, including students and homemakers), level of employment (level I: businessman, manager, professional; level II: office worker; level III: manual worker, craftsman), smoking habits;
Information on child’s physical activity: regular exercise (three or more times a week), outdoor sports;
Outdoor pollution exposure factors: perceived level of traffic near the home and the school.
The data thus obtained were statistically processed using MedCalc Software version 12.3 (MedCalc Software bvba, Ostend, Belgium). For each variable, the frequency within each weight category was calculated. Binomial logistic regression analyses with the corresponding odds ratio (OR) and a 95% confidence interval (CI) were carried out to examine the possible association between personal, socioeconomic, behavioural, and environmental factors (independent variables) and excessive weight (dependent variables).
2.4. Ethical Aspects
The parents of all subjects gave their informed consent for inclusion before their children participated in the study. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and the protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Brescia (Project identification code 1577) on 15 January 2014. All the data were gathered and analysed in accordance with Italian Legislative Decree 196 of 30/6/2003 (“protection of personal data”) and subsequent additions, for the purposes of research.
3. Results
The cohort was composed of 1164 children, of whom 1111 (95.4%) were born in Italy. Regarding their weight status, 39 (3.4% of the total) were UW, 791 (68.0%) were NW, and 334 (28.7%) OW. The latter category includes 188 children who were OB (16.2%) (Figure 1).
Table 1 shows the frequencies of OW and OB children with respect to the personal variables. Regarding gender, the cohort was composed of 592 boys (50.9%) and 572 girls (49.1%). The percentage of boys in the overweight category (31.9%) was significantly higher than the girls (25.4%) (OR = 1.38, CI = 1.07–1.78). The difference was even more marked in the OB category, which accounted for 20.1% of the boys and 12.1% of the girls (OR = 1.83, CI = 1.33–2.53).
Table 1.
Variable | (n) | OW (Including OB) | OB | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
% | OR (CI) | % | OR (CI) | |||
Gender | Boys | (592) | 31.9 | 1.38 (1.07–1.78) | 20.1 | 1.83 (1.33–2.53) |
Girls | (572) | 25.4 | - | 12.1 | ||
Age | 6 years | (459) | 29.6 | 1.08 (0.83–1.40) | 17.0 | 1.11 (0.81–1.52) |
7 years | (401) | 26.9 | - | 15.2 | - | |
8 years | (304) | 29.6 | - | 16.1 | - | |
Area of residence | North | (477) | 25.6 | 0.77 (0.59–1.00) | 14.5 | 0.81 (0.59–1.11) |
Centre–South | (687) | 30.9 | - | 17.3 | - |
OW = overweight, OB = obese, OR = Odds Ratio, CI = 95% Confidence Interval.
At the moment of recruitment, 459 children (39.4%) were aged 6, 401 (34.7%) aged 7 and 304 (26.1%) aged 8. The distribution of OW and OB did not display significant differences among the various ages.
Regarding the geographical distribution, 227 (19.5%) of the children in the cohort were resident in Torino, 250 (21.5%) in Brescia, 210 (18.0%) in Pisa, 235 (20.2%) in Perugia, and 242 (20.8%) in Lecce. In the cities of northern Italy (Torino and Brescia), there was a lower frequency of OW children (25.6%) (OR = 0.77; CI = 0.59–1.00) than those of central–southern Italy (Pisa, Perugia, and Lecce).
Table 2 shows the prevalence of OW and OB with reference to the parents’ characteristics. The parents’ nation of birth was found to be associated with children’s BMI values. Indeed, a significantly higher percentage of children with mothers born outside Italy were OW (38.9%) (OR = 1.74, CI = 1.25–2.41) than children with mothers born in Italy (26.8%). Children with fathers born outside Italy were also more likely to be OW (35.5%) (OR = 1.43; CI = 1.00–2.08) than those with fathers born in Italy (27.8%).
Table 2.
Variable | (n) | OW (Including OB) | OB | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
% | OR (CI) | % | OR (CI) | |||
Mother’s Nation of Birth | Outside Italy | (180) | 38.9 | 1.74 (1.25–2.41) | 20.6 | 1.43 (0.96–2.13) |
Italy | (984) | 26.8 | - | 15.3 | - | |
Father’s Nation of Birth | Outside Italy | (138) | 35.5 | 1.43 (1.00–2.08) | 20.3 | 1.38 (0.88–2.15) |
Italy | (1026) | 27.8 | - | 15.6 | - | |
Mother’s Level of Education | University Degree | (563) | 24.9 | 0.70 (0.54–0.90) | 13.9 | 0.72 (0.52–0.98) |
High School or Lower | (600) | 32.1 | - | 18.3 | - | |
Father’s Level of Education | University Degree | (457) | 24.5 | 0.72 (0.55–0.94) | 12.0 | 0.59 (0.42–0.83) |
High School or Lower | (689) | 31.0 | - | 18.7 | - | |
Mother Employed | Yes | (853) | 29.3 | 1.13 (0.85–1.52) | 16.3 | 1.04 (0.73–1.48) |
No | (310) | 26.8 | - | 15.8 | - | |
Father Employed | Yes | (1022) | 28.7 | 1.16 (0.76–1.77) | 16.2 | 1.14 (0.68–1.92) |
No | (124) | 25.8 | - | 14.5 | - | |
Mother’s Occupation | Level I 1 | (272) | 23.9 | 0.67 (0.48–0.93) | 9.9 | 0.46 (0.30–0.72) |
Level II 2 | (389) | 30.1 | - | 18.5 | - | |
Level III 3 | (192) | 35.4 | - | 20.8 | - | |
Father’s Occupation | Level I 1 | (427) | 23.7 | 0.64 (0.49–0.85) | 12.2 | 0.58 (0.41–0.83) |
Level II 2 | (279) | 32.3 | - | 19.0 | - | |
Level III 3 | (315) | 32.7 | - | 19.4 | - | |
Mother Smoker | Yes | (227) | 33.9 | 1.36 (1.00–1.86) | 24.2 | 1.93 (1.36–2.75) |
No | (936) | 27.4 | - | 14.2 | - | |
Father Smoker | Yes | (323) | 32.2 | 1.28 (0.97–1.70) | 21.7 | 1.72 (1.24–2.39) |
No | (822) | 27.0 | - | 13.9 | - |
1 businesswoman/businessman, manager, professional; 2 office worker; 3 manual worker, craftswoman/craftsman.
Regarding the parents’ level of education, 48.4% of mothers and 39.9% of fathers participating in the study have a degree. A significantly lower percentage of children with university-educated mothers are OW (24.9%) (OR = 0.70; CI = 0.54–0.90) or OB (13.9%) (OR = 0.72; CI = 0.52–0.98) than children whose mothers do not have this qualification (32.1% and 18.3%, respectively). Among children with university-educated fathers, 24.5% are OW (OR = 0.72; CI = 0.55–0.94) and 12.0% are OB (OR = 0.59; CI = 0.42–0.83).
The prevalence of overweight and obesity in the children included in the cohort do not seem to be correlated with the parents’ rate of employment. In contrast, regarding the type of employment, it emerged that among children whose mothers have high-level employment (businesswoman, manager, professional) 23.9% are OW (OR = 0.67; CI = 0.48–0.93) and 9.9% are OB (OR = 0.46; CI = 0.30–0.72). At lower levels of maternal employment (office workers, manual workers, and craftswomen) the percentage of OW and OB is significantly higher. Children are also less likely to be OW (23.7%; OR = 0.64; CI = 0.49–0.85) and OB (12.2%; OR = 0.58; CI = 0.41–0.83) when their fathers are employed at a high level.
Parents who smoke were correlated with excess body mass in children. Specifically, 33.9% of children with mothers who smoke were OW (OR = 1.36; CI = 1.00–1.86), including 24.2% OB (OR = 1.93; CI = 1.36–2.75), while 32.2% of children with fathers who smoke were OW (OR = 1.28; CI = 0.97–1.70), including 21.7% OB (OR = 1.72; CI = 1.24–2.39).
Table 3 shows the distribution of OW and OB with respect to the level of motor traffic perceived by the parents near the home and the children’s school. The data do not seem to indicate significant differences in weight between children living in areas with heavy traffic and those living in areas with light or moderate traffic.
Table 3.
Variable | (n) | OW (Including OB) | OB | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
% | OR (CI) | % | OR (CI) | |||
Level of Traffic near the Home | Heavy | (460) | 27.6 | 0.92 (0.71–1.19) | 15.7 | 0.94 (0.68–1.30) |
Moderate or Light | (704) | 29.4 | - | 16.5 | - | |
Level of Traffic near the School | Heavy | (603) | 29.5 | 1.09 (0.84–1.40) | 17.1 | 1.15 (0.84–1.58) |
Moderate or Light | (561) | 27.8 | - | 15.2 | - |
Of the children participating in the study, 44.8% regularly exercise three or more times a week, in 28.3% of cases in the open air (Table 4). The variables linked to the children’s physical exercise patterns were not found to be significantly correlated with their weight status.
Table 4.
Variable | (n) | OW (Including OB) | OB | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
% | OR (CI) | % | OR (CI) | |||
Sport (≥3 Times/Week) | Yes | (522) | 31.0 | 1.23 (0.95–1.59) | 18.2 | 1.31 (0.96–1.79) |
No | (642) | 26.8 | - | 14.5 | - | |
Outdoor Sports | Yes | (329) | 28.3 | 0.97 (0.73–1.29) | 16.1 | 1.00 (0.70–1.41) |
No | (835) | 28.9 | - | 16.2 | - |
4. Discussion
The data on the anthropometric variables of 1164 subjects included in the MAPEC_LIFE cohort made it possible to identify children with different body masses and to assess their distribution in the various weight categories (UW, NW, and OW, the latter including OB) on the basis of the criteria indicated by the IOTF [29,30]. The detected frequencies of children with excess weight appear to be comparable with data from other studies carried out in the WHO European Region [7,31,32] and confirm the relatively high and worrying proportion of OW and OB among Italian children. In line with other studies [10,33,34] conducted in Italy, the data also highlighted the existence of a north-south gradient regarding the frequency of overweight children, which was found to be lower in the cities of the north (Torino and Brescia) and higher in those of the centre and south (Pisa, Perugia and Lecce). Although this trend has been extensively described, it has not been clearly explained. It is probably linked to social, economic, and cultural differences between the northern and southern regions of Italy [35].
Indeed, this study showed that the weight status of the children was closely associated with personal, socio-economic, and environmental factors investigated by means of questionnaires filled in by the parents.
One of these factors is gender. In our study, a significantly greater percentage of boys than girls were OW and OB. However, this pattern is not clearly confirmed by the literature. Specifically, in studies of Italian children based on IOTF cut points [10,36], the association between male gender and excess body weight is very weak or absent. In this case, the observed phenomenon may again be linked to social and cultural factors, but it may also be the result of an artifice arising from confounding factors, which means that a more detailed investigation is required in order to confirm and justify this association.
The socio-economic factors considered in the study of the prevalence of OW and OB among children were: the parents’ nation of birth, level of education, employment status, and type of occupation.
Children with parents born outside Italy were more likely to be OW and OB than children with parents born in Italy. This observation is in line with the results of other studies conducted in the United Kingdom [37], Luxembourg [21], and Germany [19], in which this association is explained with reference to the subjects’ ethnicity, the socio-economic level of families with an immigrant background, and the continuation of certain “obesogenic” habits and behaviours. Additionally, in our study, these factors could explain the high prevalence of OW among children with parents born outside Italy. Further studies may be conducted in order to determine any differences in the distribution of OW depending on the countries of origin.
The impact of social position on the risk of obesity in developed countries has been discussed by several authors [22,32,38,39,40]. They observe that among the various measures used to classify social position, parental education has the most consistent association with OW and obesity in childhood: the lower the level of parental education, the greater the probability that children are OW or OB. It is likely that less well-educated parents also have less knowledge of healthy eating, but other factors linked to low education level may contribute to the creation of an “obesogenic” environment. Our study also found a negative correlation between the parents’ level of education and the child’s body mass.
While the parents’ employment status (employed or unemployed) does not seem to influence the weight of children in the MAPEC_LIFE cohort, their level of employment could be associated with BMI. A high professional level of parental employment—particularly of the mother—seems to have a protective effect on the children regarding the risk of obesity. A high level of employment is often correlated with a high level of education as well as a greater level of socio-economic well-being, which also entails access to goods and services (gymnasia, swimming pools, and other structures specialising in physical well-being, domestic help, etc.), which can create a protective environment in terms of various health problems, including obesity [19,41,42]. In addition, dieting and healthy weight-control practices such as reducing high energy food and fat intake and a high level of exercise are more common in women of a higher socio-economic status, who may transfer such behaviours to their children [22,43].
Additional findings of our study include the association between parental smoking—with particular reference to maternal smoking—and filial overweight. These findings are supported by similar studies conducted in very different social and cultural settings [38,44,45], in which parental smoking was found to be an independent risk factor for obesity in children, suggesting the causality of this association [38]. However, the underlying mechanism responsible for the association is still unclear. Some authors have suggested that the relationship may be linked to the smoking habits of parents (especially the mother) during pregnancy, the poor eating habits of smoking parents, or additional risk-related behaviours which make their children more inclined to become overweight and obese.
Despite the evidence presented in the literature regarding the association between traffic density, traffic-related air pollution, and the development of obesity in children [20], in our study no significant relationship was seen. It should be considered, however, that the data on traffic levels used in our analysis were based on parents’ perceptions and were therefore influenced by subjective bias that is hard to quantify.
The data on physical exercise also do not seem to be associated with overweight. In this case, the transversal data gathering could have neglected the children’s previous behaviours, considering only the exercise habits at the time of the interview, which for some children may themselves be a response to overweight or obesity.
The data obtained in the present study confirm the important role of factors linked to the family context in determining the excess body mass of children in the MAPEC_LIFE cohort. Children’s lifestyles depend almost entirely on the environment that the parents create around them from gestation onwards [13,15,16]. Previous research has shown that quantitative and qualitative aspects of the child’s diet and exercise patterns are considerably influenced by the family environment [14,18], and that the family plays an important role in both the development and prevention of weight problems in children [11,19,21]. As well as being closely linked to socio-economic status, this environment largely depends on the parents’ knowledge of factors affecting health and disease [22,38]. For this reason, obesity prevention programmes need to include effective educational provisions for both parents and children. In addition—as has been described in a pilot study conducted in the framework of this same project [46]—children have been proven to possess great sensitivity to these themes and to be fast learners regarding the concepts and lifestyles that prevent adverse health effects.
5. Conclusions
The results of this study provide information on the variables associated with the weight status of a group of 1164 children aged 6–8 resident in five Italian cities. Gender and socio-economic factors such as the parents’ nationality, level of education, and level of employment, as well as whether the parents are smokers, were found to be closely associated with overweight/obesity among the children. The distribution of subjects’ weight status also highlighted differences linked to the geographical area of residence, with a greater prevalence of overweight children in the cities of the centre and south of Italy. This study highlights the need to implement appropriate obesity prevention programs in Italy, which should include educational measures concerning lifestyles for parents from the earliest stages of their children’s lives.
This study is not without its limitations. The anthropometric data used in this work to calculate BMI and body size were self-reported by the parents who compiled the questionnaires, and were not measured in accordance with standardised methods. In addition, only some of the factors potentially affecting the children’s weight status were considered, and only basic analyses were carried out. Further studies could include the analysis of genetic factors, the family history of certain diseases such as obesity, the objective measurement of environmental parameters, the previous lifestyles and eating habits of the children and their parents (rather than just at the time of the interview), and analysis of the data by multinominal logistic regression, which can take all possible factors and their individual weight into account when determining overweight and obesity.
Acknowledgments
This work was carried out with the technical and scientific support of the MAPEC_LIFE Study Group: Beatrice Bruni, Beatrice Casini, Paolo Colombi, Loredana Covolo, Mattia De Giorgi, Francesco Donato, Cristina Fatigoni, Donatella Feretti, Andrea Festa, Camilla Furia, Laura Gaffurini, Marta Gea, Giorgio Gilli, Marcello Guido, Adele Idolo, Rosa Maria Limina, Silvano Monarca, Giacomo Palomba, Cristina Pignata, Valeria Romanazzi, Tania Salvatori, Tiziana Schilirò, Samuele Vannini, Tiziano Verri, Licia Zagni and Ilaria Zerbini. The study was funded by the European Commission Directorate General Environment as part of the LIFE+ programme for 2012, Environment Policy and Governance (grant number: LIFE12 ENV/IT/000614).
Author Contributions
All authors made substantial contributions to the conception and design of the study and were involved in critically revising the manuscript in terms of intellectual content. In addition, Tiziana Grassi performed the statistical analyses, interpreted the results and wrote the manuscript under the supervision of Antonella De Donno. Francesco Bagordo contributed to the statistical analysis and to writing the manuscript. Francesca Serio and Prisco Piscitelli were involved in writing the manuscript. Massimo Moretti, Annalaura Carducci and Elisabetta Carraro were involved in the study design and methodology. Elisabetta Ceretti, Gaia C.V. Viola, Sara Levorato, Gabriele Donzelli and Sara Bonetta were involved in the development of the questionnaire and data collection. Claudia Zani, Milena Villarini, Marco Verani, Silvia Bonetta, Silvia Bonizzoni and Alberto Bonetti critically revised the manuscript. Umberto Gelatti, the project leader and scientific coordinator of the consortium, devised the study design and methodology, and critically revised the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the manuscript, and have given final approval for submission.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- 1.World Health Organization . Obesity: Preventing and Managing the Global Epidemic. World Health Organization; Geneva, Switzerland: 2000. (WHO Obesity Technical Report Series 894). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.James P.T., Leach R., Kalamara E., Shayeghi M. The Worldwide obesity epidemic. Obes. Res. 2001;9:228S–233S. doi: 10.1038/oby.2001.123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Caballero B. The global epidemic of obesity: An overview. Epidemiol. Rev. 2007;29:1–5. doi: 10.1093/epirev/mxm012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ahmad Q.I., Ahmad C.B., Ahmad S.M. Childhood obesity. Indian J. Endocrinol. Metab. 2010;14:19–25. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Lobstein T., Baur L., Uauy R., IASO International Obesity Task Force Obesity in children and young people: A crisis in public health. Obes. Rev. 2004;5:4–104. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2004.00133.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Branca F., Nikogosian H., Lobstein T. The Challenge of Obesity in the WHO European Region and the Strategies for Response. World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe; Copenhagen, Denmark: 2007. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Wijnhoven T.M., van Raaij J.M., Spinelli A., Starc G., Hassapidou M., Spiroski I., Rutter H., Martos É., Rito A.I., Hovengen R., et al. WHO European childhood obesity surveillance initiative: Body mass index and level of overweight among 6–9-year-old children from school year 2007/2008 to school year 2009/2010. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:1002. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lobstein T. Prevalence and Trends across the World. [(accessed on 30 August 2016)]. Available online: http://ebook.ecog-obesity.eu/chapter-epidemiology-prevention-across-europe/prevalence-trends-across-world/
- 9.Ng M., Fleming T., Robinson M., Thomson B., Graetz N., Margono C., Mullany E.C., Biryukov S., Abbafati C., Ferede Abera S. Global, regional, and national prevalence of overweight and obesity in children and adults during 1980–2013: A systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2013. Lancet. 2014;384:766–781. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60460-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Nardone P., Spinelli A., Lauria L., Buoncristiano M., Lauria L., Pizz E., Galeone D. Il Sistema di Sorveglianza OKkio Alla SALUTE: Risultati 2014. [(accessed on 27 July 2016)]. Available online: http://www.iss.it/binary/publ/cont/ONLINE_Okkio.pdf.
- 11.Apovian C.M. Obesity: Definition, comorbidities, causes, and burden. Am. J. Manag. Care. 2016;22:S176–S185. doi: 10.1016/S0889-8529(16)30074-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Maffeis C. Aetiology of overweight and obesity in children and adolescents. Eur. J. Pediatr. 2000;159:S35–S44. doi: 10.1007/PL00014361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Reilly J.J., Armstrong J., Dorosty A.R., Emmett P.M., Ness A., Rogers I., Steer C., Sherriff A. Early life risk factors for obesity in childhood: Cohort study. Br. Med. J. 2005;330:1357–1364. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38470.670903.E0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Wareham N.J., van Sluijs E.M.F., Ekelund U. Physical activity and obesity prevention: A review of the current evidence. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2005;64:229–247. doi: 10.1079/PNS2005423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Taylor R.W., Grant A.M., Goulding A., Williams S.M. Early adiposity rebound: Review of papers linking this to subsequent obesity in children and adults. Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care. 2005;8:607–612. doi: 10.1097/01.mco.0000168391.60884.93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Monteiro P.O.A., Victora C.G. Rapid growth in infancy and childhood and obesity in later life—A systematic review. Obes. Rev. 2005;6:143–154. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2005.00183.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ong K.K. Size at birth, postnatal growth and risk of obesity. Horm. Res. 2006;65:65–69. doi: 10.1159/000091508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Moreno L.A., Rodríguez G. Dietary risk factors for development of childhood obesity. Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care. 2007;10:336–341. doi: 10.1097/MCO.0b013e3280a94f59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kleiser C., Schaffrath Rosario A., Mensink G.B.M., Prinz-Langenohl R., Kurth B.M. Potential determinants of obesity among children and adolescents in Germany: Results from the cross-sectional KIGGS study. BMC Public Health. 2009;9:1002. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Jerrett M., McConnell R., Wolch J., Chang R., Lam C., Dunton G., Gilliland F., Lurmann F., Islam T., Berhane K. Traffic-related air pollution and obesity formation in children: A longitudinal, multilevel analysis. Environ. Health. 2014;13:49. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-13-49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Tchicaya A., Lorentz N. Relationship between Children’s body mass index and parents’ obesity and socioeconomic status: A multilevel analysis applied with Luxembourg data. Health. 2014;6:2322–2332. doi: 10.4236/health.2014.617267. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Lamerz A., Kuepper-Nybelen J., Wehle C., Bruning N., Trost-Brinkhues G., Brenner H., Hebebrand J., Herpertz-Dahlmann B. Social class, parental education, and obesity prevalence in a study of six-year-old children in Germany. Int. J. Obesity. 2005;29:373–380. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802914. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Reilly J.J., Methven E., McDowell Z.C., Hacking B., Alexander D., Steward L., Kelnar C.J.H. Health consequences of obesity. Arch. Dis. Child. 2003;88:748–752. doi: 10.1136/adc.88.9.748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ebbeling C.B., Pawlak D.B., Ludwig D.S. Childhood obesity: Public-health crisis, common sense cure. Lancet. 2002;360:473–482. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09678-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Wang G., Dietz W.H. Economic burden of obesity in youths aged 6 to 17 years: 1979–1999. Pediatrics. 2002;109:E81–E86. doi: 10.1542/peds.109.5.e81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Feretti D., Ceretti E., De Donno A., Moretti M., Carducci A., Bonetta S., Marrese M.R., Bonetti A., Covolo L., Bagordo F., et al. Monitoring air pollution effects on children for supporting public health policy: The protocol of the prospective cohort MAPEC study. BMJ Open. 2014;4:e006096. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.De Donno A., Grassi T., Ceretti E., Viola G.C.V., Levorato S., Vannini S., Salvatori T., Carducci A., Verani M., Bonetta S., et al. Air pollution biological effects in children living in Lecce (Italy) by buccal micronucleus cytome assay (the MAPEC_LIFE study) Int. J. Sus. Dev. Plan. 2016;11:500–510. doi: 10.2495/SDP-V11-N4-500-510. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Zani C., Donato F., Grioni S., Viola G.C.V., Ceretti E., Feretti D., Festa A., Bonizzoni S., Bonetti A., Monarca S., et al. Feasibility and reliability of a questionnaire for evaluation of the exposure to indoor and outdoor air pollutants, diet and physical activity in 6–8-year-old children. Ann. Ig. 2015;27:646–656. doi: 10.7416/ai.2015.2056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Cole T.J., Bellizzi M.C., Flegal K.M., Dietz W.H. Establishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: International survey. BMJ. 2000;320:1240–1243. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7244.1240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Cole T.J., Flegal K.M., Nicholls D., Jackson A.A. Body mass index cut offs to define thinnes in children and adolescents: International survey. BMJ. 2007;335:194. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39238.399444.55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Wijnhoven T.M.A., van Raaij J.M.A., Spinelli A., Rito A.I., Hovengen R., Kunesova M., Starc G., Rutter H., Sjöberg A., Petrauskiene A., et al. WHO European Childhood Obesity Surveillance Initiative 2008: Weight, height and body mass index in 6–9-year-old children. Pediatr. Obes. 2013;8:79–97. doi: 10.1111/j.2047-6310.2012.00090.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Ahrens W., Pigeot I., Pohlabeln H., De Henauw S., Lissner L., Molnár D., Moreno L.A., Tornaritis M., Veidebaum T., Siani A., On behalf of the IDEFICS consortium Prevalence of overweight and obesity in European children below the age of 10. Int. J. Obes. 2014;38:S99–S107. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2014.140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Maffeis C., Consolaro A., Cavarzere P., Chini L., Banzato C., Grezzani A., Silvagni D., Salzano G., De Luca F., Tatò L. Prevalence of overweight and obesity in 2- to 6-year-old Italian children. Obesity. 2006;14:765–769. doi: 10.1038/oby.2006.87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Censi L., D’Addesa D., Martone D., Galfo M., Bevilacqua N., Roccaldo R., Angelini V., Fabbri I., Catasta G., Toti E., et al. Articolazione dello studio ZOOM8. In: Censi L., D’Addesa D., Galeone D., Andreozzi S., Spinelli A., editors. Studio ZOOM8: l’alimentazione e l’attività Fisica dei Bambini della Scuola Primary. Volume 42. Istituto Superiore di Sanità; Roma, Italy: 2012. pp. 5–16. Rapporti ISTISAN 12/42. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Turchetta F., Gatto G., Saulle R., Romano F., Boccia A., La Torre G. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of overweight and obesity among school-age children in Italy. Epidemiol. Prev. 2012;36:188–195. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Celi F., Bini V., De Giorgi G., Molinari D., Faraoni F., Di Stefano G., Bacosi M.L., Berioli M.G., Contessa G., Florin A. Epidemiology of overweight and obesity among school children and adolescents in three provinces of central Italy, 1993–2001: Study of potential influencing variables. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2003;57:1045–1051. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Harding S., Teyhan A., Maynard M.J., Cruickshank J.K. Ethnic differences in overweight and obesity in early adolescence in the MRC DASH study: The role of adolescent and parental lifestyle. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2008;37:162–172. doi: 10.1093/ije/dym252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Huerta M., Bibi H., Haviv J., Scharf S., Gdalevich M. Parental smoking and education as determinants of overweight in Israeli children. Prev. Chronic Dis. 2006;3:1–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Shrewsbury V., Wardle J. Socioeconomic status and adiposity in childhood: A systematic review of cross-sectional studies 1990–2005. Obesity. 2008;16:275–284. doi: 10.1038/oby.2007.35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Johnson F., Pratt M., Wardle W. Socio-economic status and obesity in childhood. In: Moreno L.A., Pigeot I., Ahrens W., editors. Epidemiology of Obesity in Children and Adolescents—Prevalence and Etiology. Volume 2. Springer; New York, NY, USA: 2011. pp. 377–390. [Google Scholar]
- 41.Coll J.L., del Mar Bibiloni M., Salas R., Pons A., Tur J.A. The prevalence of excessive weight in Balearic Islands’ young and middle-aged women and its association with social and socioeconomic factors: A ten-year trend (2000–2010) BMC Public Health. 2015;15:1002. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2196-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Lissner L., Wijnhoven T.M.A., Mehlig K., Sjöberg A., Kunesova M., Yngve A., Petrauskiene A., Duleva V., Rito A.I., Breda J. Socioeconomic inequalities in childhood overweight: Heterogeneity across five countries in the WHO European Childhood Obesity Surveillance Initiative (COSI-2008) Int. J. Obes. 2016;40:796–802. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2016.12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Lin B.H., Huang C.L., French S.A. Factors associated with women’s and children’s body mass indices by income status. Int. J. Obes. 2004;28:536–542. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Hui L.L., Nelson E.A., Yu L.M., Li A.M., Fok T.F. Risk factors for childhood overweight in 6- to 7-y-old Hong Kong children. Int. J. Obes. Relat. Metab. Disord. 2003;27:1411–1418. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Danielsik S., Czerwinski-Mast M., Langnäse K., Dilba B., Müller M.J. Parental overweight, socioeconomic status and high birth weight are the major determinants of overweight and obesity in 5–7 y-old children: Baseline data of the Kiel Obesity Prevention Study (KOPS) Int. J. Obes. Relat. Metab. Disord. 2004;28:1494–1502. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Carducci A., Casini B., Donzelli G., Verani M., Bruni B., Ceretti E., Zani C., Carraro E., Bonetta S., Bagordo F., et al. Improving awareness of health hazards associated with air pollution in primary school children: Design and test of didactic tools. Appl. Environ. Educ. Commun. 2016;15:247–260. doi: 10.1080/1533015X.2016.1181017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]