Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 May 10.
Published in final edited form as: Chemistry. 2016 Apr 5;22(20):6755–6758. doi: 10.1002/chem.201601004

Modular Synthesis of Novel Macrocycles Bearing α,β-Unsaturated Chemotypes via a Series of One-Pot, Sequential Protocols

Salim Javed 1,#, Mahipal Bodugam 1,#, Jessica Torres 1, Arghya Ganguly 1, Paul R Hanson 1,*
PMCID: PMC5094705  NIHMSID: NIHMS800393  PMID: 27059428

Abstract

A series of one-pot, sequential protocols was developed for the synthesis of novel macrocycles bearing α,β-unsaturated chemotypes. The method highlights a phosphate tether-mediated approach to establish asymmetry, and consecutive one-pot, sequential processes to access the macrocycles with minimal purification procedures. This library amenable strategy provided diverse macrocycles containing α,β-unsaturated carbon-, sulfur- or phosphorus-based warheads.

Keywords: macrocyclic compounds, one-pot reactions, heterocyclic compounds, lactams, phosphate-tether mediation


Macrocycles are privileged structures for biological studies as they can display unique features such as conformational pre-organization, flexibility, selectivity, and potential higher affinity with protein targets.[1] Hence, macrocycles are promising molecules for the modulation of challenging processes[2] such as protein-protein interactions[3] and epigenetic events.[4] Moreover, the significance of macrocycles has been demonstrated in drug development with more than one hundred macrocycle-containing compounds currently explored in therapy.[5]

Of particular interest, naturally-occurring macrocycles bearing α,β-unsaturated entities have shown a wide range of important medicinal activities (Figure 1).[6] In a number of cases, the presence of this type of functionality has been shown to be essential for biological activity. For instance, the Z-conformation provided by the conjugated lactone on microtubule binding agents laulimalide[6d] and dictyostatin,[6h] appears to be a necessary feature for their potent anticancer activities. Furthermore, several natural products containing α,β-unsaturated chemotypes are known to bind covalently with proteins, leading to relevant biological responses.[7,8] Examples include the protein kinase inhibitor hypothemycin[7a] and antibacterial agent atrop-abyssomicin C,[7b] which function by covalently binding to a cysteine residue on their targets. Similarly, syringolin A targets the proteasome via Michael addition of a catalytic threonine to the α,β-unsaturated amide.[7c] As a result of these contributions and others,[8] electrophilic molecules are receiving attention in imaging,[9] activity-based protein profiling[10] and therapeutics,[11] despite concerns of off-target effects.[11c, 12]

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Bioactive macrocyclic natural products bearing α,β-unsaturated chemotypes.

Accordingly, natural product-based macrocycles are attractive synthesis targets that have inspired efforts in methods and libraries development.[5a,13] Recently, we disclosed the application of one-pot, sequential operations for the concise total synthesis of α,β-unsaturated macrolactone Sch-725674 (Figure 1).[14] By combining an uninterrupted sequence of reactions in a single flask, one-pot protocols enable the formation of multiple bonds and stereocenters in one synthetic step.[15] This process circumvents the need for work-up and chromatography procedures between intermediary reactions with the ultimate goal of reducing time demands and waste generation. Consequently, pot-economical methods are gaining popularity[16] as powerful strategies to achieve the synthesis of complex scaffolds while invoking atom,[17] step,[18] redox,[19] and green[20] economy. Among several featured works in the literature, elegant efforts by Hayashi[21] are of particular note given the use of consecutive one-pot procedures to complete the multi-reaction syntheses of (–)-oseltamivir,[22] prostaglandin A1 and E1 methyl esters,[23] (–)-horsfiline and (–)-coerulescine.[24] A later synthesis of (–)-oseltamivir[25] was accomplished in a single pot operation and similarly, ABT-341[26] and (S)-baclofen[27] were generated following one-pot syntheses.

Inspired by these notable developments and motivated by the efficiency of our recent strategy applied to the synthesis of Sch-725674,[14] we planned to refine the method to access diverse natural product-like, α,β-unsaturated macrolactones and surrogates. Herein, we describe the synthesis of novel macrocycles via efficient, one-pot syntheses (Scheme 1). The developed sequential protocols are amenable to the synthesis of macrocyclic libraries containing diverse α,β-unsaturated warheads, including carbon- (1), sulfur- (2) and phosphorus-based (3) chemotypes as electronically attenuated diversity elements. Key structural features of macrocycles 1–3 include a 14-membered ring, an unsaturated warhead, a central 1,3-anti-diol subunit, and a functionalized side-chain handle (Scheme 1).

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Overall pot-economical approach to the synthesis of novel macrocylcles bearing α,β-unsaturated chemotypes.

Efforts to macrolactone 1a began by employing a phosphate tether-mediated one-pot, sequential RCM/CM/chemoselective hydrogenation[“H2”] protocol[28] to couple phosphate triene (R,R)-4 and cross-metathesis (CM) partner 5, providing bicyclic afforded phosphate triester 6 in 40% overall yield over the course of three reactions, representing an average yield of 74% for each reaction (74% av/rxn, Scheme 2). By exploiting the orthogonal leaving and protecting group ability of bicyclic phosphate 6, we next applied a one-pot Pd-catalyzed, reductive allylic transposition and phosphate tether removal protocol[29g] (Scheme 2). This pot-economical operation provided 1,3-anti-diol 7 in 56% overall yield (83% av/rxn) after a sequence of three reactions and no solvent change. The method continued with simple protecting group manipulations and acylation with acryloyl chloride. The latter process was streamlined in a one-pot procedure and afforded acrylate ester 9a in 75% overall yield after three reactions (91% av/rxn). The synthesis of 1a was completed in short order via a final one-pot event consisting of a ring-closing metathes is (RCM) and MOM-deprotection sequence in 67% yield over two reactions (82% av/rxn). Overall, 14-membered macrolactone 1a was synthesized from triene (R,R)-4 in 11.2% total yield following eleven reactions in four pots, significantly reducing intermediate isolations.

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2

Four-pot synthesis of α,β-unsaturated macrolactone 1a.

Encouraged by these results, we were next interested in exploring the applicability of our method for the generation of phosphate 6 (Scheme 1, path A).[14,29] This first one-pot event derivatives. In particular, vinyl sulfonates and their analogs have a rich biological profile that has seen a resurgence in recent years due to their activities against enzymes involved in parasitic diseases[30] and cancer.[11g,31] To exploit the adaptability of the strategy, we investigated the application of the above described four-pot process for the synthesis of macrosultone 2a (Scheme 1, path A). We were pleased to find that the protocol only required swapping acryloyl chloride with 2-chloroethanesulfonyl chloride and no alterations to the one-pot reaction conditions were necessary. Hence, the synthesis of vinyl sulfonate 10a was accomplished via a one-pot, sequential MOM-protection/TBS-deprotection/sulfonylation operation in 72% overall yield (89.5% av/rxn, Scheme 3). Similar to 1a, the pathway was finalized by applying a one-pot, sequential RCM/MOM-deprotection protocol, generating macrosultone 2a in 70% yield over two reactions in one-pot (84% av/rxn, Scheme 3).

Scheme 3.

Scheme 3

Sequential one-pot protocols to α,β-unsaturated macrosultone 2a.

Next, we evaluated our approach for the synthesis of macrolactam (1b) and macrosultam (2b) derivatives in order to provide additional warhead diversity. On the basis of the efficiency observed during the acrylation and sulfonylation reactions in previous syntheses, we anticipated the use of similar transformations to install the corresponding amine-based, α,β-unsaturated warheads. To this end, we accommodated a one-pot procedure involving a Mitsunobu reaction on carbinol 8, followed by azide reduction with LiAlH4 and subsequent amine functionalization (Scheme 1, path B).

To develop this route, we investigated the use of alkaline aqueous solutions for in situ quenching of LiAlH4 and successive amine functionalization. In this event, we found that saturated NaHCO3 allows for deactivation of the reducing agent and simultaneously, provides efficient basic conditions for the addition of acryloyl chloride (Scheme 4). Following a one-pot, three-reaction procedure, the desired product 9a was obtained in 73% yield (90% av/rxn) without any solvent adjustment. Analogously, by applying saturated K2CO3 and 2-chloroethanesulfonyl chloride during the third reaction of the one-pot event, sulfonamide 10b was furnished in 81% overall yield (93% av/rxn). The corresponding macrocyclic products were then obtained via a one-pot, RCM/MOM-deprotection sequence, delivering macrolactam 1b (60%, 77.5% av/rxn) and macrosultam 2b (64%, 80% av/rxn, Scheme 4). Taken together, 1b and 2b were efficiently synthesized after a series of five one-pot operations, considerably reducing purification procedures over thirteen reaction steps from phosphate (R,R)-4.

Scheme 4.

Scheme 4

One-pot protocols to α,β-unsaturated macrolactam 1b and macrosultam 2b.

Next, we were interested in the synthesis of related macrocycles 3a and 3b, given the rich biological history of phosphorus-containing molecules.[32] The RCM precursors 11a and 11b were synthesized via similar processes, with the difference of carrying out the warhead installation in a separate pot due to reagent incompatibilities. Accordingly, following a two-step, one-pot sequence on intermediates 7 and 8, and work-up, the crude product from each sequential procedure was treated with phosphorylating conditions (Scheme 5). Thus, after three reactions in two-pots, P-chiral vinyl phosphonates 11a-RP and 11a-SP were obtained in 60% overall yield (84.5% av/rxn). Likewise, P-chiral vinyl phosphonamidates 11b-RP and 11b-SP were furnished in 57% over three reactions in two-pots (83% av/rxn). In the final step, the diastereomeric mixtures underwent efficient RCM to deliver α,β-unsaturated, P-stereogenic phostones 3a-RP/SP and phostams 3b-RP/SP in 77% and 71% yields, respectively (Scheme 5). Overall, macrocycles 3a and 3b were accessed from (R,R)-4 after conducting ten and twelve reactions, respectively, over efficient processes that reduced the number of reaction pots to five and six.

Scheme 5.

Scheme 5

Synthesis of α,β-unsaturated P-containing macrocycles.

In summary, we have disclosed a series of efficient, one-pot, sequential protocols that enable the asymmetric synthesis of natural product-like macrocycles bearing an α,β-unsaturated entity (1–3). The macrocycles were accessed in four- to six-pot processes from (R,R)-4 and fragment 5 with total yields ranging from 7.3% to 11.2%. The overall pot-economical approach is operationally simple, efficient, and library amenable. A notable merit of the method is the application of multiple consecutive pot-economic operations that significantly avoid purification procedures between successive reactions. Based on our previous applications of the RCM/CM/[“H2”] protocol,[29] we expect that a CM partner can be tactically chosen to assemble macrocycles with additional diversity, including various ring s izes. Further expansion of this synthetic approach for the synthesis of a variety of novel medium- and large-sized macrocycles will be reported in due course.

Acknowledgements

This investigation was generously supported by funds provided by NIGMS (NIH R01GM077309). J.T. acknowledges financial support from the NIGMS Diversity Program. The authors are grateful to the University of Kansas and the State of Kansas for support of our program. The authors also thank Justin Douglas and Sarah Neuenswander in the University of Kansas NMR Laboratory and Todd Williams for HRMS analysis. The authors thank Materia, Inc. for supplying metathesis catalyst.

Footnotes

Supporting information for this article is given via a link at the end of the document.

References

  • 1.a Udugamasooriya DG, Spaller MR. Biopolymers. 2008;89:653. doi: 10.1002/bip.20983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Wessjohann LA, Ruijter E, Garcia-Rivera D, Brandt W. Mol. Divers. 2005;9:171. doi: 10.1007/s11030-005-1314-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Giordanetto F, Kihlberg J. J. Med. Chem. 2014;57:278. doi: 10.1021/jm400887j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Yudin AK. Chem. Sci. 2015;6:30. doi: 10.1039/c4sc03089c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.a Driggers EM, Hale SP, Lee J, Terrett NK. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2008;7:608. doi: 10.1038/nrd2590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Bauer RA, Wurst JM, Tan DS. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2010;14:308. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2010.02.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Doak BC, Zheng J, Dobritzsch D, Kihlberg J. J. Med. Chem. 2015 doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b01286. Article ASAP, DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b01286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.a Villar EA, Beglov D, Chennamadhavuni S, Porco JA, Jr., Kozakov D, Vajda S, Whitty A. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2014;10:723. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.1584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Gavenonis J, Sheneman BA, Siegert TR, Eshelman MR, Kritzer JA. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2014;10:716. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.1580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.a Mwakwari SC, Patil V, Guerrant W, Oyelere AK. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2010;10:1423. doi: 10.2174/156802610792232079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Mai A. ChemMedChem. 2014;9:415. doi: 10.1002/cmdc.201400084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.a Marsault E, Peterson ML. J. Med. Chem. 2011;54:1961. doi: 10.1021/jm1012374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Mallinson J, Collins I. Future Med. Chem. 2012;4:1409. doi: 10.4155/fmc.12.93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Peterson ML. In: Macrocycles in Drug Discovery, RSC Drug Discovery Series, No. 40. Levin J, editor. RSC; Cambridge: 2015. pp. 398–486. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.a Takamatsu S, Kim YP, Hayashi M, Hiraoka H, Natori M, Komiyama K, Omura S. J. Antibiot. (Tokyo) 1996;49:95. doi: 10.7164/antibiotics.49.95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Zhang H, Tomoda H, Tabata N, Miura H, Namikoshi M, Yamaguchi Y, Masuma R, Omura S. J. Antibiot. (Tokyo) 2001;54:635. doi: 10.7164/antibiotics.54.635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Njardarson JT, Gaul C, Shan D, Huang X-Y, Danishefsky SJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004;126:1038. doi: 10.1021/ja039714a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Gallagher BM, Jr., Fang FG, Johannes CW, Pesant M, Tremblay MR, Zhao H, Akasaka K, Li X, Liu J, Littlefield BA. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2004;14:575. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2003.12.001. and references therein. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e Yang SW, Chan TM, Terracciano J, Loebenberg D, Patel M, Chu M. J. Antibiot. (Tokyo) 2005;58:535. doi: 10.1038/ja.2005.74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f Nakae K, Nishimura Y, Ohba S, Akamatsu Y. J. Antibiot. (Tokyo) 2006;59:685. doi: 10.1038/ja.2006.91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; g Keller S, Nicholson G, Drahl C, Sorensen E, Fiedler H-P, Süssmuth RD. J. Antibiot. 2007;60:391. doi: 10.1038/ja.2007.54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; h Jung W-H, Harrison C, Shin Y, Fournier J-H, Balachandran R, Raccor BS, Sikorski RP, Vogt A, Curran DP, Day BW. J. Med. Chem. 2007;50:2951. doi: 10.1021/jm061385k. and references therein. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; i Xing Y, O'Doherty GA. Org. Lett. 2009;11:1107. doi: 10.1021/ol9000119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; j Freundlich JS, Lalgondar M, Wei J-R, Swanson S, Sorensen EJ, Rubin EJ, Sacchettini JC. Tuberculosis. 2010;90:298. doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2010.08.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; k Low WK, Li J, Zhu M, Kommaraju SS, Shah-Mittal J, Hull K, Liu JO, Romo D. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2014;22:116. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2013.11.046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; l Zhang J, Lin X-P, Li L-C, Zhong B-L, Liao X-J, Liu Y-H, Xu S-H. RSC Adv. 2015;5:54645. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.a Schirmer A, Kennedy J, Murli S, Reid R, Santi DV. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2006;103:4234. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0600445103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Keller S, Schadt HS, Ortel I, Süssmuth RD. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007;46:8284. doi: 10.1002/anie.200701836. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Groll M, Schellenberg B, Bachmann AS, Archer CR, Huber R, Powell TK, Lindow S, Kaiser M, Dudler R. Nature. 2008;452:755. doi: 10.1038/nature06782. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.a Drahl C, Cravatt BF, Sorensen EJ. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005;44:5788. doi: 10.1002/anie.200500900. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Gersch M, Kreuzer J, Sieber SA. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2012;29:659. doi: 10.1039/c2np20012k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.a Edgington LE, Verdoes M, Bogyo M. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2011;15:798. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2011.10.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Xue L, Karpenko IA, Hiblot J, Johnsson K. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2015;11:917. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.1959. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.a Cravatt BF, Wright AT, Kozarich JW. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2008;77:383. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.75.101304.124125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Sanman LE, Bogyo M. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2014;83:249. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060713-035352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Niphakis MJ, Cravatt BF. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2014;83:341. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060713-035708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.a Potashman MH, Duggan ME. J. Med. Chem. 2009;52:1231. doi: 10.1021/jm8008597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Johnson DS, Weerapana E, Cravatt BF. Future Med. Chem. 2010;2:949. doi: 10.4155/fmc.10.21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Singh J, Petter RC, Baillie TA, Whitty A. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2011;10:307. doi: 10.1038/nrd3410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Liu Q, Sabnis Y, Zhao Z, Zhang T, Buhrlage SJ, Jones LH, Gray NS. Chem. Biol. 2013;20:146. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2012.12.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e Kumalo HM, Bhakat S, Soliman MES. Molecules. 2015;20:1984. doi: 10.3390/molecules20021984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.a Liebler DC, Guengerich FP. Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery. 2005;4:410. doi: 10.1038/nrd1720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Baell J, Walters MA. Nature. 2014;513:481. doi: 10.1038/513481a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.a Takahashi T, Kusaka S, Doi T, Sunazuka T, Omura S. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003;42:5230. doi: 10.1002/anie.200352229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Kopp F, Stratton CF, Akella LB, Tan DS. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2012;8:358. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Beckmann HSG, Nie F, Hagerman CE, Johansson H, Tan YS, Wilcke D, Spring DR. Nat. Chem. 2013;5:861. doi: 10.1038/nchem.1729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Grossmann A, Bartlett S, Janecek M, Hodgkinson JT, Spring DR. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014;53:13093. doi: 10.1002/anie.201406865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e Kitsiou C, Hindes JJ, I'Anson P, Jackson P, Wilson TC, Daly EK, Felstead HR, Hearnshaw P, Unsworth WP. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015;54:15794. doi: 10.1002/anie.201509153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bodugam M, Javed S, Ganguly A, Torres J, Hanson PR. Org. Lett. 2016;18:516. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.5b03547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.a Clarke PA, Santos S, Martin WHC. Green Chem. 2007;9:438. [Google Scholar]; b Clarke PA, Zaytzav AV, Whitwood AC. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007;48:5209. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.a Vaxelaire C, Winter P, Christmann M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011;50:3605. doi: 10.1002/anie.201100059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Albrecht Ł, Jiang H, Jørgensen KA. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011;50:8492. doi: 10.1002/anie.201102522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Hong B-C, Raja A, Sheth VM. Synthesis. 2015;47:3257. [Google Scholar]; d Kashinath K, Reddy DS. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2015;13:970. doi: 10.1039/c4ob02143f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.a Trost BM. Science. 1991;254:1471. doi: 10.1126/science.1962206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Trost BM. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1995;34:259. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.a Wender PA, Croatt MP, Witulski B. Tetrahedron. 2006;62:7505. [Google Scholar]; b Wender PA, Verma VA, Paxton TJ, Pillow TH. Acc. Chem. Soc. 2008;41:40. doi: 10.1021/ar700155p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Burns NZ, Baran PS, Hoffmann RW. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009;48:2854. doi: 10.1002/anie.200806086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.a Anastas P, Eghbali N. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010;39:301. doi: 10.1039/b918763b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Dunn PJ. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012;41:1452. doi: 10.1039/c1cs15041c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Gupta P, Mahajan A. RSC Adv. 2015;5:26686. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hayashi Y. Chem. Sci. 2016;7:866. doi: 10.1039/c5sc02913a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.a Ishikawa H, Suzuki T, Hayashi Y. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009;48:1304. doi: 10.1002/anie.200804883. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Ishikawa H, Suzuki T, Orita H, Uchimaru T, Hayashi Y. Chem. Eur. J. 2010;16:12616. doi: 10.1002/chem.201001108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Umemiy a S, Hayashi Y. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013;52:3450. doi: 10.1002/anie.201209380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Mukaiyama T, Ogata K, Sato I, Hayashi Y. Chem. Eur. J. 2014;20:13583. doi: 10.1002/chem.201403932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Mukaiyama T, Ishikawa H, Koshino H, Hayashi Y. Chem. Eur. J. 2013;19:17789. doi: 10.1002/chem.201302371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ishikawa H, Honma M, Hayashi Y. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011;50:2824. doi: 10.1002/anie.201006204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hayashi Y, Sakamoto D, Okamura D. Org. Lett. 2016;18:4. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.5b02839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Venukadasula PKM, Chegondi R, Suryn GM, Hanson PR. Org. Lett. 2012;14:2634. doi: 10.1021/ol301007h. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.a Whitehead A, McReynolds MD, Moore JD, Hanson PR. Org. Lett. 2005;7:3375. doi: 10.1021/ol0512886. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Venukadasula KM, Chegondi R, Maitra S, Hanson PR. Org. Lett. 2010;12:1556. doi: 10.1021/ol1002913. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Hanson PR, Chegondi R, Nguyen J, Thomas CD, Waetzig J, Whitehead AJ. J. Org. Chem. 2011;76:4358. doi: 10.1021/jo2003506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Chegondi R, Tan MML, Hanson PR. J. Org. Chem. 2011;76:3909. doi: 10.1021/jo200337v. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e Jayasinghe S, Venukadasula PKM, Hanson PR. Org. Lett. 2014;16:122. doi: 10.1021/ol403110p. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f Chegondi R, Hanson PR. Tetrahedron Lett. 2015;56:3330. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2015.01.109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; g Hanson PR, Jayasinghe S, Maitra S, Markley JL. Top. Curr. Chem. 2015;361:253. doi: 10.1007/128_2014_572. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.a Powers JX, Asgian JL, Ikici ÖD, James KE. Chem. Rev. 2002;102:4639. doi: 10.1021/cr010182v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Lecaille F, Kaleta J, Brömme D. Chem. Rev. 2002;102:4459. doi: 10.1021/cr0101656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Kiemele ER, Wathier M, Bichler P, Love JA. Org. Lett. ASAP; 2016. DOI: 10.1021/acs.orglett.5b03535 and references cited therein. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.a Gushwa NN, Kang S, Chen J, Taunton J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012;134:20214. doi: 10.1021/ja310659j. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Miller RM, Taunton J. Methods Enzymol. 2014;548:93. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-397918-6.00004-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.a Seto H, Kuzuyama T. Nat. Prod. Rep. 1999;16:589. doi: 10.1039/a809398i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Metcalf WW, van der Donk WA. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2009;78:65. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.78.091707.100215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Hunter T. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B. 2012;367:2513. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Kamerlin SC, Sharma PK, Prasad RB, Warshel A. Q. Rev. Biophys. 2013;46:1. doi: 10.1017/S0033583512000157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES