Skip to main content
PMC home page
The British Journal of Ophthalmology logoLink to The British Journal of Ophthalmology
. 1958 Jan;42(1):38–53. doi: 10.1136/bjo.42.1.38

CHANGEABILITY TEST OF AQUEOUS OUTFLOW RESISTANCE*,†

A TONOGRAPHIC STUDY OF NORMAL AND GLAUCOMATOUS EYES EFFECT OF GANGLIONIC BLOCKING AGENTS ANALYSIS OF INITIAL PART OF TONOGRAPHIC TRACING

Erik Linnér 1
PMCID: PMC509617  PMID: 13499855

Full text

PDF
48

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BARANY E. H. In vitro studies of the resistance to flow through the angle of the anterior chamber. Acta Soc Med Ups. 1954 Mar 31;59(3-4):260–276. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BARANY E. H., SCOTCHBROOK S. Influence of testicular hyaluronidase on the resistance to flow through the angle of the anterior chamber. Acta Physiol Scand. 1954;30(2-3):240–248. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1954.tb01092.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. BECKER B., FRIEDENWALD J. S. Clinical aqueous outflow. AMA Arch Ophthalmol. 1953 Nov;50(5):557–571. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1953.00920030567002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. DE ROETTH A., Jr, SCHWARTZ H. Aqueous humor dynamics in glaucoma: effect of ganglionic blocking agents and thiopental sodium (pentothal) anesthesia on aqueous humor dynamics. AMA Arch Ophthalmol. 1956 Jun;55(6):755–764. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. EBERHARTINGER W., SCHENK H. Untersuchungen des Augendruckes bei Medikation von Hydrazino-Phthalazin (Apresolin und Nepresol). Ophthalmologica. 1957 Jun;133(6):406–413. doi: 10.1159/000305532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. FRANCOIS J., RABAEY M., NEETENS A. Perfusion studies on the outflow of aqueous humor in human eyes. AMA Arch Ophthalmol. 1956 Feb;55(2):193–204. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1956.00930030195005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. GOLDMANN H. Abflussdruck, Minutenvolumen und Widerstand der Kammerwasserströmung des Menschen. Doc Ophthalmol. 1951;5-6:278–356. doi: 10.1007/BF00143664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. GRANT W. M. Tonographic method for measuring the facility and rate of aqueous flow in human eyes. Arch Ophthal. 1950 Aug;44(2):204–214. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1950.00910020209003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. KAPLAN M. R., PILGER I. S. The effect of Rauwolfia serpentina derivatives on intraocular pressure. Am J Ophthalmol. 1957 Apr;43(4 Pt 1):550–574. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(57)90808-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. KORNBLUTH W., LINNER E. Experimental tonography in rabbits; effect of unilateral ligation of common carotid artery on aqueous humor dynamics as studied by means of tonography and fluorescein appearance time. AMA Arch Ophthalmol. 1955 Nov;54(5):717–724. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. KRONFELD P. C. Tonography. AMA Arch Ophthalmol. 1952 Oct;48(4):393–404. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1952.00920010402001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. KUPFER C., LAWRENCE C., LINNER E. Long-term administration of acetazoleamide (diamox) in the treatment of glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1955 Nov;40(5 Pt 1):673–680. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(55)91494-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. PRIJOT E., LAVERGNE G. Etude tonographique du mode d'action du diamox. Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol. 1956;111:346-52; discussion, 352-3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. ROSEN D. A. Aqueous humor flow; the effects of a ganglionic blocking drug, pentolinium, on certain aspects of aqueous humor dynamics. AMA Arch Ophthalmol. 1957 Mar;57(3):361–365. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. ROSENGREN B. Rise in the ocular tension produced by circumlimbal pressure on the sclera. Trans Opthal Soc U K. 1956;76:65–72. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. SPENCER R. W., HELMICK E. D., SCHEIE H. G. Tonography; technical difficulties and control studies. AMA Arch Ophthalmol. 1955 Oct;54(4):515–527. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. STONE H. H., PRIJOT E. L. The effect of a barbiturate and paraldehyde on aqueous humor dynamics in rabbits. AMA Arch Ophthalmol. 1955 Dec;54(6):834–840. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1955.00930020840004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. SUGAR S., FAINSTEIN S. The coefficient of outflow of aqueous; with the water test and following the use of diamox. Am J Ophthalmol. 1955 Nov;40(5 Pt 1):693–697. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. VAN BEUNINGEN E. G., FISCHER F. W. Die klinische Bedeutung der Tonographie. Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Ophthalmol. 1957;158(4):297–302. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. WEEKERS R., WATILLON M., DE RUDDER M. Experimental and clinical investigations into the resistance to outflow of aqueous humour in normal subjects. Br J Ophthalmol. 1956 Apr;40(4):225–233. doi: 10.1136/bjo.40.4.225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. WIRTH A. La misura tonografica della resistenza al deflusso dell'umor acqueo. Boll Ocul. 1956 Sep-Dec;35(9-12):872–888. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of Ophthalmology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES