Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2016 Nov 10;6:36422. doi: 10.1038/srep36422

Novel amperometric glucose biosensor based on MXene nanocomposite

R B Rakhi 1,2,*, Pranati Nayuk 1,*, Chuan Xia 1, Husam N Alshareef 1,a
PMCID: PMC5103228  PMID: 27830757

Abstract

A biosensor platform based on Au/MXene nanocomposite for sensitive enzymatic glucose detection is reported. The biosensor leverages the unique electrocatalytic properties and synergistic effects between Au nanoparticles and MXene sheets. An amperometric glucose biosensor is fabricated by the immobilization of glucose oxidase (GOx) enzyme on Nafion solubilized Au/ MXene nanocomposite over glassy carbon electrode (GCE). The biomediated Au nanoparticles play a significant role in facilitating the electron exchange between the electroactive center of GOx and the electrode. The GOx/Au/MXene/Nafion/GCE biosensor electrode displayed a linear amperometric response in the glucose concentration range from 0.1 to 18 mM with a relatively high sensitivity of 4.2 μAmM−1 cm−2 and a detection limit of 5.9 μM (S/N = 3). Furthermore, the biosensor exhibited excellent stability, reproducibility and repeatability. Therefore, the Au/MXene nanocomposite reported in this work is a potential candidate as an electrochemical transducer in electrochemical biosensors.

MXenes, a new family of two-dimensional (2D) metal carbides, have attracted significant research interest in recent years due to their unique properties such as metallic conductivity and hydrophilic surfaces leading to stability in aqueous environments1,2. This rare combination of properties makes them suitable candidates for various promising applications. MXenes are synthesized by the selective etching of the “A” layers from the layered carbides known as MAX phases, resulting in a morphology similar to the exfoliated graphite3. These materials can be reliably produced in large quantities, which guarantees their scalable production for various applications4. The potential use of MXenes as efficient electrode materials for electrochemical energy storage applications has been well demonstrated5,6,7,8. MXenes present great application prospects as electrochemical transducer in sensing applications as well9.

The detection and quantification of glucose- the most important monosaccharide in vital life processes- are popular research topics in the field of sensors10,11,12,13,14,15. Electrochemical sensing, by virtue of its rapid response, ease of use, lowcost, portability, reliability, good sensitivity, and excellent selectivity, is one of the promising and widely accepted technique for glucose sensing12,15,16,17. Recognition element, electrochemical transducer and a signal processing unit for the recording, amplification and user-friendly data representation are the three major components of an electrochemical biosensor18,19. Recognition element, the primary component of a biosensor, allows the sensor to respond selectively to one particular analyte from among a large number of other substances. Depending on the type of recognition element, biosensors can be classified as enzymatic, non-enzymatic, whole-cell and immunosensors20. Among these, enzymatic biosensors are highly selective, sensitive, fast and reversible21,22. Glucose biosensor is the most common enzymatic biosensor. The enzyme used for the detection of glucose is glucose oxidase (GOx)23,24,25,26,27. GOx catalyses the oxidation of glucose into gluconolactone and hydrogen peroxide28.

An efficient and sensitive glucose biosensor with good sensitivity can be fabricated by immobilizing GOx with an appropriate electrochemical transducer21,24,29,30,31,32. Physical adsorption (drop casting method) is the simplest of all the immobilizing techniques to incorporate enzymes to transducers without affecting their native conformation, and this technique is commonly used for biosensors in the research stage33. Being a mechanically stable, compact, solid, impermeable to gasses and liquids, glassy carbon electrode (GCE) is a widely accepted biosensor immobilization matrix34,35,36. However, the potential for the oxidation/reduction of H2O2 over GCE is relatively high. This potential can be lowered by the incorporation of biocompatible and highly conductive Au nanoparticles onto the electrochemical transducer immobilization matrix36,37,38. When used as a component in enzymatic electrochemical biosensors, Au nanostructures allow enzymes (proteins) to retain their biological activity upon adsorption and reduce the insulating effect of the protein shell for direct electron transfer21,23,39,40,41,42,43,44,45. The performance of an electrochemical biosensor (sensitivity, selectivity, detection limit, detection potential, linearity range) essentially depends on the specific surface area, conductivity, charge transfer properties and more importantly the catalytic activity of the sensing matrix. Materials having high specific surface area build up more current, which improve significantly the sensitivity and linearity of a biosensor46. Similarly materials having better catalytic activity lower the detection potential, improve sensitivity and detection limit47. In this respect, nanomaterials having different size, shape and crystal facets influence the performance of the sensor. With decreasing size of a metal nanoparticle, the effect of atoms at corners and edges of nanoparticles becomes dominant which exhibit intrinsically different catalytic performance in contrast to a nanoparticle with a larger size48. Similarly, materials with different shapes (flowers, sheets) usually exhibit quite different catalytic behaviors intrinsically resulting from the differences in geometric structure and electronic state of the catalyst atoms associated with different crystallographic surfaces49. Ishida et al. studied the effect of size of gold nanocluster on catalytic performance in the oxidation of glucose50. Many reports are available on the efficient use of Au/nanocarbon composite as electrochemical transducer in glucose biosensors37,38. Reports also suggest the extensive use of Nafion solution for the better adhesion of enzyme molecules to the GCE31,51,52.

To the best of our knowledge, no reports are available on the use of Au/MXene composites for biosensors applications. In this paper, we report for the first time the fabrication and analytical performance of an enzymatic glucose biosensor electrode by the deposition of 32 units of GOx onto Nafion solubilized Au/MXene nanocomposite over GCE. Ti3C2Tx MXene nanosheets are prepared by the selective etching of Al from the Ti3AlC2 MAX phase. Crystalline Au nanoparticles are anchored onto the surface of the MXene sheets by a simple chemical reduction method. The performance of the biosensor is investigated by different electrochemical techniques, and the results are discussed.

Results

Characterization and morphology of the electrochemical transducers

The schematic of the synthesis of Au/MXene composite is shown in Fig. 1. Powder XRD patterns of Ti3C2Tx MXene, Au nanoparticles and Au/MXene nanocomposite are shown in Fig. 2a. The pattern of Ti3C2Tx MXene agrees well with XRD pattern of HF treated Ti3C2Tx in the literature. All the diffraction peaks in the XRD pattern of the nanoparticles collected from the solution can be readily indexed to a pure face-centered cubic phase of Au (space group: Fm3m (225), JCPDS card no. 00-004-0784). The XRD pattern of Au-MWNTnanocomposite material shows the reflections of Au along with that of Ti3C2Tx MXene. Extensive TEM analysis was carried out to investigate the microstructure of the Au/MXene nanocomposite in detail. TEM image of Au/MXene composite (Fig. 2b) shows an almost uniform distribution of Au nanoparticles over the surface of an exfoliated extremely thin and transparent MXene nanosheet. Ultrasonication results in the separation of the individual MXene sheet from the stack. The average particle size of Au is 6–8 nm. Majority of the Au nanoparticles remain attached to the MXene sheets, even after the TEM specimen preparation process involving ultrasonication, indicating that strong interactions exist between the Au nanoparticles and the MXene nanosheets. Fast Fourier transform (FFT) pattern of a selected region, from the HRTEM image of Au/MXene composite shown in Fig. 2c, obtained along the [002] zone axis is shown as inset of Fig. 2c and the corresponding selected area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern is shown in Fig. 2d. The SAED pattern indicates the polycrystalline structure of the nanogold. Diffraction rings in the SAED pattern can be indexed to the FCC cubic Au structure using circular Hough diffraction analysis, and these results agree well with the PXRD results. The HRTEM image in Fig. 2c clearly displays the crystalline nature of the Au nanoparticles.

Figure 1. Schematic showing the synthesis process of Au/MXene nanocomposites.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

(a) Powder X-ray diffraction pattern of Ti3C2Tx MXene, Au nanoparticles and Au/MXene nanocomposite (b) TEM and (c) HRTEM images of Au/MXene nanocomposite. Inset of (c) shows the FFT pattern taken from the marked area. (d) SAED pattern corresponding to the marked area in (c).

Electrochemical characterization of fabricated glucose biosensors

For evaluation of the electron transfer phenomenon of the fabricated biosensor electrodes, cyclic voltammetric (CV) responses were recorded for the GOx/MXene/Nafion/GCE and GOx/Au/MXene/Nafion/GCE bioelectrodes at different scan rates in pH7 PBS, under N2-saturated conditions (Fig. 3a,b). A pair of well-defined redox peaks were observed at −0.49 V for GOx/MXene/Nafion/GCE. A shift in redox peak towards lower potential is observed for GOx/Au/MXene/Nafion/GCE indicating facilitated electron communication between the active site of GOx and the Mxene electrode with Au decoration (Fig. S2 ESI). Again a linearity of cathodic/anodic peak currents with scan rates (insets of Fig. 3) indicates a surface-confined electrode reaction process.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

CV profile of (a) GOx/Au/MXene/Nafion/GCE and (b) GOx/MXene/Nafion/GCE bioelectrodes in N2-saturated PBS solution (0.1 M, pH7.0) at different scan rates: 50–500 mV/s. Insets: Plot of corresponding redox peak currents (Ip) vs. square root of scan rates.

The CV curves of the fabricated GOx/MXene/Nafion/GCE and GOx/Au/MXene/Nafion/GCE bioelectrodes to the addition of 0.3 mM of H2O2 to pH 7 phosphate buffer solution at a scan rate of 10 mV/s are illustrated in Fig. 4a,b respectively. Minor reduction peaks were observed at −0.5 V for both the fabricated electrodes in the absence of H2O2. In both cases,a significant improvement in the reduction peak current is observed upon the addition of H2O2. The catalytic activity of Nafion solubilized MXene is identified from Fig. 4a. The reduction current obtained for the GOx/Au/MXene/Nafion/GCE bioelectrode is nearly 3-fold higher than that obtained for GOx/MXene/Nafion/GCE, and this can be attributed to the superior conductivity and catalytic activity of the former due to the incorporation of Au nanoparticles. The remarkable electronic properties induced by the Au nanoparticles in the Au/MXene nanocomposite, results in relatively fast charge transport within the GOx/Au/MXene/Nafion/GCE bioelectrodes, leading to better electrocatalytic performance toward the detection of H2O2. The direct electrochemistry of GOx immobilized MXene/Nafion/GCE and Au/MXene/Nafion/GCE bioelectrodes were investigated in 5 mM glucose solution. Figure 4c shows the CV curves at the scan rate of 10 mV/s for MXene/Nafion/GCE and GOx/MXene/Nafion/GCE in 5 mM of glucose solution. No significant peaks are observed in the CV loop of the MXene/Nafion/GCE, whereas, the GOx/MXene/Nafion/GCE bioelectrode exhibited a well-defined glucose oxidation peak −0.402 V which is characteristic peak of reversible electron transfer process of redox active center in the GOx during the oxidation of glucose. A similar trend is observed in GOx/Au/MXene/Nafion/GCE electrode in 5 mM of glucose solution andthat is evident from Fig. 4d. Accordingly, the sensing mechanism of glucose can be explained as follows:

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

CV responses of the fabricated (a) GOx/MXene/Nafion/GCE and (b) GOx/Au/MXene/Nafion/GCE bioelectrodes toward the addition of 0.3 mM of H2O2 to pH 7 phosphate buffer solution at a scan rate of 10 mV/s, CV responses of (c) GOx/MXene/Nafion/GCE and (d) GOx/Au/MXene/Nafion/GCE bioelectrodes in 5 mM of glucose solution.

GOx enzyme comprises of two identical protein subunits and one flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD) coenzyme molecule. The FAD coenzyme molecule is present in the active site of the GOxenzyme. Due to its highly reversible electrochemistry, FAD works efficiently as a cofactor. FAD can be reduced in a two-electron, two proton process to form FADH2. During the enzymatic reaction between GOx and glucose, glucose is oxidized to glucono-d-lactone and the FAD is reduced to FADH2. Subsequently, FADH2 undergoes oxidation by dissolved O2 producing H2O2 and becomes FAD27. These processes can be represented using the following equations.

graphic file with name srep36422-m1.jpg
graphic file with name srep36422-m2.jpg

Combining these two equations the oxidation process of glucose in the presence of GOx enzyme can be represented as

graphic file with name srep36422-m3.jpg

GOx/Au/MXene/Nafion/GCE exhibits better catalytic activity than GOx/ MXene/Nafion/GCE which is evident from the larger value of the peak current.

Electro catalytic activity of the fabricated biosensors

Amperometric i-t measurements can be used as an effective tool for investigating the sensitivity of the fabricated biosensor towards varying conc. of glucose in the supporting electrolyte. Amperometrici-tcurves for the MXene/Nafion/GCE at a constant voltage of −0.402 V is shown in Fig. 5a. The amperometric response of the fabricated bioelectrode toward the detection of glucose has been carefully recorded by increasing the concentration of glucose in the 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7) solution systematically. Figure 5b,c show typical amperometric i-t curves recorded for the fabricated GOx/Au/MXene/Nafion/GCE bioelectrode. For both GOx/MXene/Nafion/GCE and GOx/Au/MXene/Nafion/GCE, at a particular conc. of glucose, a stable current is achieved after a period. For GOx/MXene/Nafion/GCE, at lower concentration of glucose, the current stability is achieved within 20 s. Whereas, for GOx/Au/MXene/Nafion/GCE bioelectrode, at lower glucose concentration, a stable value is reached within 10 s. A general trend of increasing current with increasing glucose concentration is observed from all the three graphs (Fig. 5a–c). This clearly demonstrates the sensitivity of the fabricated biosensors to varying glucose concentration. Figure 5d shows the steady-state calibration curves drawn using the steady-state current values corresponding to different glucose concentrations for GOx/MXene/Nafion/GCE and GOx/Au/MXene/Nafion/GCE. The steady-state calibration curve for GOx/MXene/Nafion/GCE biosensor exhibits a linear range from 0.5–6 mM conc. of glucose with a detection limit of 100 μM and that of GOx/Au/MXene/Nafion/GCE exhibits a linear range from 0.1–18 mM conc. of glucose with a detection limit of 5.9 μM (S/N = 3). GOx/Au/MXene/Nafion/GCE biosensor exhibited a sensitivity of 4.2 μAmM−1cm−2.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Amperometric i-t curves for (a) GOx/MXene/Nafion/GCE, (b,c) GOx/Au/MXene/Nafion/GCE at a constant voltage of −0.402 V. (d) Steady-state calibration curves for GOx/MXene/Nafion/GCE and GOx/Au/MXene/Nafion/GCE.

Storage stability of the GOx/Au/MXene/Nafion/GCE biosensor was investigated by every day monitoring its response current to 3 mM glucose conc. The biosensor electrode retained 93% of its initial response current even after two months storage period indicating its good storage stability. The electrode also exhibited excellent repeatability (twelve repeated measurements) and reproducibility (twelve individual measurements) with an average relative standard deviation of 1.26% and 2.74%, respectively.

The selectivity of the fabricated biosensor electrode is assessed by investigating the influence of the common interfering electroactive substances such as dopamine (DA), uric acid (UA) and ascorbic (AA) and the results are presented in Fig. S3. The fabricated GOx/Au/MXene/Nafion/GCE biosensor electrode, shows better selectivity towards the detection of glucose as compared to DA, UA or AA at −0.402 V, which can be attributed to the presence of negatively charged Nafion solution coating on the surface of the electrode.

Discussions

Since MXene nanosheets have excellent in-plane conductivity, when used as an enzyme immobilization matrix, both MXene and Au/MXene are capable of improving electron transfer kinetics between the active redox centers of the enzyme. Nafion assists the dispersion of Au/MXene composite, whereby the Au/MXene remain well-dispersed in prolonged standing and helps in forming uniform and stable film on the GCE. The superior sensing performance of GOx/Au/MXene/Nafion/GCE is attributed to the improvement in the relative activity of GOx in the presence of Au nanoparticles. It has been widely reported that the biosensing properties of graphene-based sensors can be dramatically improved by anchoring Au nanoparticles on the surface of graphene nanosheets53,54,55,56,57. In a similar way, dispersion of Au nanoparticles on the surface of MXene nanosheets is expected to improve the electrical conductivity and makes the resultant Au/MXene composite as a better electrochemical transducer/enzyme immobilization matrix. Furthermore, Nafion being a negatively charged polyelectrolyte matrix, reduces the permeability of negatively charged substrates. Hence the Nafion coating on the GOx/Au/MXene/Nafion/GCE surface eliminates the influence of interfering signals and improves the selectivity of the sensor.

Table 1 shows a comparison of some of the relevant analytical parameters such as detection limit, linear range and sensitivity of the fabricated biosensors in the present study with literature results. It is evident from this table that the GOx/Au/MXene/Nafion/GCE bioelectrode exhibits significantly improved sensing performance than most of the previously reported glucose biosensors. The performance of the biosensor is comparable to some of the best published performances.

Table 1. Comparison of analytical performance of the fabricated GOx/Au/MXene/Nafion/GCE biosensor with other glucose biosensor.

Electrode Linear range (mM) Detection Limit (μM) Sensitivity (μA mM−1 cm −2) Reference
GOx/Au/MWCNT/Pt 0.1–10 6.7 2.57 58
GOx/MWCNTs/CS/GCE 0–7.8 10 0.52 59
PDDA–GOx/Au/MWCNTs/GCE 0.5–5 — 3.96 60
GOx/graphene/PANI/Au/GCE 0.004–1.12 0.6 — 61
GOx/PPyAA/Au/GCE 1–18 50 0.42 22
G-MWCNT/GCE 6.30–20.09 — 2.47 62
GOx/GR-MWNTs/AuNPs 0.01–2 2–5.2 4.1 950 0.695 0.2380 21
GOx/Au/MWCNTs/PVA/GCE 0.5–8 200 16.6 63
GOx/Au/MXene/Nafion/GCE 0.1–18 5.9 4.2 This work
Open in a new tab

The present study successfully demonstrated for the first time, the use of Nafion solubilized Au/MXene nanocomposite as a novel matrix for GOx immobilization. GOx/Au/MXene/Nafion/GCE biosensor is fabricated by a mere dropcasting method. Au nanoparticles anchored on the surface of MXene nanosheets significantly improved the electron transfer process between GOx and GCE. The fabricated biosensor electrode exhibited excellent electrocatalytic activity toward the detection of glucose with a wide linear range from 0.1 mM to 18 mM, good sensitivity of 4.2 μA mM−1 cm−2, a lower detection limit of 5.9 μM, excellent stability, repeatability and reproducibility. The results indicate that the GOx/Au/MXene/Nafion/GCE biosensor electrode is suitable for measurement of the glucose conc. (in a range 0.1–18 mM) in biological samples for the detection of Diabetes Mellitus.

Methods

Materials

Inline graphic D-(+)-Glucose and Hydrogen Peroxide solution were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. The glucose stock solution was allowed to mutarotate for 24 h at room temperature prior to use and subsequently store at 4 °C. Nafion solution (D1021 Water based 1100 EW at 10% weight) and GOx (EC 1.1.3.4, Aspergillus niger, >100 U/mg) were purchased from Ion Power Inc. and Alfa Aesar respectively. Ti3C2Tx MXenes were synthesized by chemical vapor deposition technique as described below in section 2.2. The supporting electrolyte was 0.1 M phosphate buffer at pH 7 unless otherwise stated. The common chemicals used for the preparation of buffers, etc., were of analytical reagent grade. All of the solutions were prepared with deionized distilled (DI) water.

Synthesis of Ti3C2Tx MXene

Two-dimensional titanium carbide nanosheets were synthesized by exfoliation of commercially procured Ti3AlC2 powders. The as-received Ti3AlC2 powders were immersed in 40% HF for 2.5 h at room temperature. The resulting suspension was collected and then washed with DI water for several times and then filtered to get 2D Titanium Carbide nanosheets (MXenes).

Preparation of Au/MXene Composite

In order to decorate the Ti3C2Tx MXene nanosheets with nanocrystalline Au clusters, a chemical reduction method was used. 0.075 M HAuCl4·3H2O solution is reduced by adding a reducing solution, which is a mixture of 0.1 M NaBH4 and 1 M NaOH, assisted by stirring. Nearly 0.05 g of Ti3C2TX MXene was added to the above solution. The resultant mixture is subjected to ultrasonication for 30 minutes. Once, the reaction is over; the solution is washed three times with deionized water and filtered using cellulose membrane filters having a pore size of 0.1 μm. The material left out is collected and dried in a vacuum oven at 80 °C for 2 h. The sample was then characterized using XRD, SEM, and energy dispersive analysis of X-rays (EDAX).

Fabrication of GOx/Au/MXene/Nafion/GCE

In order to get a clean mirror surface, the bare GCE was polished with 0.05 μm alumina slurry, sonicated in deionized water, and dried with a high-purity nitrogen stream. The Ti3C2TX MXene (or Au/MXene nanocomposite) was sonicated in 0.5% Nafion solution to get a concentration of ∼1 mg/ml. 4 μL of the suspension was then film cast onto the surface of the GCE and allowed to dry slowly. A 4 μL portion of 32 U GOx solution was film cast onto the surface of the Au/MXene/Nafion/GCE and allowed to dry slowly at 4 °C. The obtained GOx/Au/MXene/Nafion/GCE electrode was washed carefully with doubly distilled water and dried at less than 4 °C. These GOx/Au/MXene/Nafion/GCE bioelectrodes were coated with an extra 2 μL layer of 0.5% Nafion. The electrodes were rinsed with pH 7 buffer and stored in the buffer at 4 °C prior to use.

Instruments

The electrochemical measurements were performed using a CH Instruments CHI 660D Electrochemical Analyzer/Workstation. A Pt wire counter electrode, Ag/AgCl (3 M KCl) reference electrode, and glassy carbon electrode (GCE, diameter 3 mm) were inserted into a modified 10 mL glass cell (Model CHI-222) for the measurement. All potentials are referred to the Ag/AgCl reference electrode. A magnetic stirrer provided the convective transport at 300 rpm during the amperometric measurements, and the background current was allowed to decay to a steady-state value before spiking the equilibrated -D-glucose. The nanocomposite materials were characterized by a powder X-ray diffraction system (XRD, Bruker, D8 ADVANCE) equipped with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 0.15406 nm). The surface morphology and microstructure of the samples were investigated by a scanning electron microscopy (SEM, FEI Quanta 600D and NOVA NANO SEM) and transition electron microscopy (TEM, FEI Titan) and the elemental presence was identified using energy dispersive X-ray analysis (EDAX).

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Rakhi, R. B. et al. Novel amperometric glucose biosensor based on MXene nanocomposite. Sci. Rep. 6, 36422; doi: 10.1038/srep36422 (2016).

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Information
srep36422-s1.pdf (600.6KB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

Research reported in this manuscript has been supported by King Abdullah University of Science and Technology. Authors thank the ‘Advanced Nanofabrication and Imaging and Characterization Laboratories’ at KAUST. R. B. Rakhi acknowledges the support of Ramanujan Fellowship, Department of Science and Technology (DST), Govt. of India and CSIR-NIIST Thiruvananthapuram, India.

Footnotes

Author Contributions R.B.R. and P.N. conducted the research, carried out the electrochemical experiments and discussed the results. C.X. carried out the TEM analysis. H.N.A., R.B.R. and P.N. drafted the paper. All of the authors reviewed the manuscript and participated in discussions on the results of this research.

References

  1. Naguib M. et al. Two-Dimensional Transition Metal Carbides. ACS nano 6, 1322–1331 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Naguib M. et al. Two-Dimensional Nanocrystals Produced by Exfoliation of Ti3AlC2. Adv. Mater. 23, 4248–4253 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Naguib M., Mochalin V. N., Barsoum M. W. & Gogotsi Y. 25th Anniversary Article: MXenes: A New Family of Two-Dimensional Materials. Adv. Mater. 26, 992–1005 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hwang J. Y. et al. Direct preparation and processing of graphene/RuO2 nanocomposite electrodes for high-performance capacitive energy storage. Nano Energy 18, 57–70 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  5. Lukatskaya M. R. et al. Cation Intercalation and High Volumetric Capacitance of Two-Dimensional Titanium Carbide. Science 341, 1502–1505 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Naguib M. et al. MXene: a promising transition metal carbide anode for lithium-ion batteries. Electrochem. Commun. 16, 61–64 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  7. Dall’Agnese Y. et al. High capacitance of surface-modified 2D titanium carbide in acidic electrolyte. Electrochem. Commun. 48, 118–122 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  8. Tang Q., Zhou Z. & Shen P. Are MXenes Promising Anode Materials for Li Ion Batteries? Computational Studies on Electronic Properties and Li Storage Capability of Ti3C2 and Ti3C2X2 (X = F, OH) Monolayer. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 16909–16916 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Wang F. et al. An Organ-Like Titanium Carbide Material (MXene) with Multilayer Structure Encapsulating Hemoglobin for a Mediator-Free Biosensor. J. Electrochem. Soc. 162, B16–B21 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  10. Yu Z. et al. Facile synthesis of NiCo2O4@Polyaniline core-shell nanocomposite for sensitive determination of glucose. Biosensors & bioelectronics 75, 161–165 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Sedghi R. & Pezeshkian Z. Fabrication of non-enzymatic glucose sensor based on nanocomposite of MWCNTs-COOH-Poly(2-aminothiophenol)-Au NPs. Sens. Actuators 219, 119–124 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  12. Mani V. et al. Electrodeposition of copper nanoparticles using pectin scaffold at graphene nanosheets for electrochemical sensing of glucose and hydrogen peroxide. Electrochim. Acta 176, 804–810 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  13. Khan M. & Park S.-Y. Glucose biosensor based on GOx/HRP bienzyme at liquid-crystal/aqueous interface. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 457, 281–288 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Chou J.-C. et al. Dynamic and Wireless Sensing Measurements of Potentiometric Glucose Biosensor Based on Graphene and Magnetic Beads. IEEE Sens. J. 15, 5718–5725 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  15. Balouch Q. et al. Cobalt Oxide Nanoflowers for Electrochemical Determination of Glucose. J. Electron. Mater. 44, 3724–3732 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  16. Li C. L., Wang H. J. & Yamauchi Y. Electrochemical Deposition of Mesoporous Pt-Au Alloy Films in Aqueous Surfactant Solutions: Towards a Highly Sensitive Amperometric Glucose Sensor. Chemistry-a European Journal 19, 2242–2246 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Malgras V. et al. Nanoarchitectures for Mesoporous Metals. Adv. Mater. 28, 993–1010 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Martinkova P. & Pohanka M. Biosensors for blood glucose and diabetes diagnosis: evolution, construction, and current status. Anal. Lett. 48, 2509–2532 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  19. Korotkaya E. V. Biosensors: design, classification, and applications in the food industry. Foods and Raw Materials 2, 161–171 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  20. Glen E. & Fryxell G. C. Environmental Applications of Nanomaterials: Synthesis, Sorbents and Sensors. 2 edn, (Imperial College Press, 2012). [Google Scholar]
  21. Devasenathipathy R. et al. Glucose biosensor based on glucose oxidase immobilized at gold nanoparticles decorated graphene-carbon nanotubes. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 78, 40–45 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Senel M. & Nergiz C. Novel amperometric glucose biosensor based on covalent immobilization of glucose oxidase on poly(pyrrole propylic acid)/Au nanocomposite. Curr. Appl Phys. 12, 1118–1124 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  23. Samphao A. et al. Flow-injection amperometric determination of glucose using a biosensor based on immobilization of glucose oxidase onto Au seeds decorated on core Fe3O4 nanoparticles. Talanta 142, 35–42 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Ghasemi E., Shams E. & Nejad N. F. Covalent modification of ordered mesoporous carbon with glucose oxidase for fabrication of glucose biosensor. J. Electroanal. Chem. 752, 60–67 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  25. Chengcheng L. et al. A glucose oxidase-coupled DNAzyme sensor for glucose detection in tears and saliva. Biosens. Bioelectron. 70, 455–461 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Heller A. & Feldman B. Electrochemical glucose sensors and their applications in diabetes management. Chem. Rev. 108, 2482–2505 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Harper A. & Anderson M. R. Electrochemical Glucose Sensors-Developments Using Electrostatic Assembly and Carbon Nanotubes for Biosensor Construction. Sensors 10, 8248–8274 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Palod P. A. & Singh V. Improvement in glucose biosensing response of electrochemically grown polypyrrole nanotubes by incorporating crosslinked glucose oxidase. Materials Science & Engineering C-Materials for Biological Applications 55, 420–430 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Anusha J. R. et al. Amperometric glucose biosensor based on glucose oxidase immobilized over chitosan nanoparticles from gladius of Uroteuthis duvauceli. Sens. Actuators, B-Chemical 215, 536–543 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  30. Tembe S. & D’Souza S. F. Immobilisation strategies for construction of tyrosinase-based biosensors. Mater. Technol. 30, B190–B195 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  31. Hossain M. F., Heo M., Shin J. H. & Park J. Y. An Electrochemical Enzymatic Biosensor Based on Au/FGs/sol-gel-GOx Composite/Nafion. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 10, 6803–6819 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  32. Anusha J. R. et al. Effective immobilization of glucose oxidase on chitosan submicron particles from gladius of Todarodes pacificus for glucose sensing. Bioelectrochemistry 104, 44–50 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Nenkova R., Wu J., Zhang Y. & Godjevargova T. Evaluation of Immobilization Techniques for the Fabrication of Nanomaterial-Based Amperometric Glucose Biosensors. Anal. Lett. 48, 1297–1310 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  34. Yang Z. et al. An enzymatic glucose biosensor based on a glassy carbon electrode modified with cylinder-shaped titanium dioxide nanorods. Microchimica Acta 182, 1841–1848 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  35. Baghayeri M. Glucose sensing by a glassy carbon electrode modified with glucose oxidase and a magnetic polymeric nanocomposite. Rsc Advances 5, 18267–18274 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  36. Xin D. et al. Facile synthesis of beta-lactoglobulin-functionalized multi-wall carbon nanotubes and gold nanoparticles on glassy carbon electrode for electrochemical sensing. Biosens. Bioelectron. 62, 73–78, doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2014.06.030 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Baby T. T., Aravind S. S. J., Arockiadoss T., Rakhi R. B. & Ramaprabhu S. Metal decorated graphene nanosheets as immobilization matrix for amperometric glucose biosensor. Sens. Actuators 145, 71–77 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  38. Nayak P., Santhosh P. N. & Ramaprabhu S. Synthesis of Au-MWCNT-Graphene hybrid composite for the rapid detection of H2O2 and glucose. Rsc Advances 4, 41670–41677 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  39. Zhong G.-X. et al. A nonenzymatic amperometric glucose sensor based on three dimensional nanostructure gold electrode. Sens. Actuators 212, 72–77 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  40. Chowdhury A. D., Gangopadhyay R. & De A. Highly sensitive electrochemical biosensor for glucose, DNA and protein using gold-polyaniline nanocomposites as a common matrix. Sens. Actuators 190, 348–356 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  41. Qin X. et al. Graphene/polyaniline/gold nanoparticles nanocomposite for the direct electron transfer of glucose oxidase and glucose biosensing. Sens. Actuators, B (Chemical) 190, 562–569 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  42. Qingping W., Fanfei M. & Jinbo Z. Preparation of gold nanowires and its application in glucose biosensing. Mater. Lett. 91, 9–11 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  43. Fakhrabadi N. H., Rohani A. A. & Farahbakhsh A. In Functional Materials and Nanotechnology Vol. 496 Advanced Materials Research (eds Xu B. & Li H. Y.) 17–20 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  44. Li C. et al. Electrochemical synthesis of mesoporous gold films toward mesospace-stimulated optical properties. Nat. Commun. 6, doi: 10.1038/ncomms7608 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Li C. L. et al. Superior electrocatalytic activity of mesoporous Au film templated from diblock copolymer micelles. Nano Research 9, 1752–1762 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  46. Dong X. C. et al. 3D Graphene-Cobalt Oxide Electrode for High-Performance Supercapacitor and Enzymeless Glucose Detection. Acs Nano 6, 3206–3213 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Zhang M. et al. Highly sensitive glucose sensors based on enzyme-modified whole-graphene solution-gated transistors. Sci. Rep. 5, doi: 10.1038/srep08311 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Hvolbaek B. et al. Catalytic activity of Au nanoparticles. Nano Today 2, 14–18 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  49. Shaowen Cao F. F. T., Yu Tang, Yuting Li & Jiaguo Yu. Size and shape dependent catalytic performances of oxidation and reduction reactions on nanocatalysts. Chem. Soc. Rev., doi: 10.1039/C6CS00094K (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Ishida T. et al. Influence of the Support and the Size of Gold Clusters on Catalytic Activity for Glucose Oxidation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 47, 9265–9268 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Rakhi R. B., Sethupathi K. & Ramaprabhu S. A Glucose Biosensor Based on Deposition of Glucose Oxidase onto Crystalline Gold Nanoparticle Modified Carbon Nanotube Electrode. J. Phys. Chem. 113, 3190–3194 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Zargoosh K. et al. Highly sensitive glucose biosensor based on the effective immobilization of glucose oxidase/carbon-nanotube and gold nanoparticle in nafion film and peroxyoxalate chemiluminescence reaction of a new fluorophore. Talanta 93, 37–43 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Valappil M. O., Alwarappan S. & Narayanan T. N. Atomic Layers in Electrochemical Biosensing Applications - Graphene and Beyond. Curr. Org. Chem. 19, 1163–1175 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  54. Aswathi R., Ali M. M., Shukla A. & Sandhya K. Y. A green method to gold-graphene nanocomposite from cyclodextrin functionalized graphene for efficient non-enzymatic electrochemical sensing applications. Rsc Advances 5, 32027–32033 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  55. Wang L. et al. Highly Sensitive Electrochemical Biosensor for Evaluation of Oxidative Stress Based on the Nanointerface of Graphene Nanocomposites Blended with Gold, Fe3O4, and Platinum Nanoparticles. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7, 18441–18449 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Chu Z. et al. In-situ fabrication of well-distributed gold nanocubes on thiol graphene as a third-generation biosensor for ultrasensitive glucose detection. Electrochim. Acta 176, 162–171 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  57. Li S. et al. A novel hydrogen peroxide sensor based on Ag nanoparticles decorated polyaniline/graphene composites. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 132, doi: 10.1002/app.42409 (2015). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  58. Wu B.-Y. et al. Amperometric glucose biosensor based on multilayer films via layer-by-layer self-assembly of multi-wall carbon nanotubes, gold nanoparticles and glucose oxidase on the Pt electrode. Biosensors & Bioelectronics 22, 2854–2860 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Deng S., Jian G., Lei J., Hu Z. & Ju H. A glucose biosensor based on direct electrochemistry of glucose oxidase immobilized on nitrogen-doped carbon nanotubes. Biosensors & Bioelectronics 25, 373–377 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Yao Y.-L. & Shiu K.-K. Direct electrochemistry of glucose oxidase at carbon nanotube-gold colloid modified electrode with poly(diallyldimethylammonium chloride) coating. Electroanalysis 20, 1542–1548 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  61. Xu Q. et al. Graphene/polyaniline/gold nanoparticles nanocomposite for the direct electron transfer of glucose oxidase and glucose biosensing. Sens. Actuators, B-Chemical 190, 562–569 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  62. Periasamy A. P., Chang Y.-J. & Chen S.-M. Amperometric glucose sensor based on glucose oxidase immobilized on gelatin-multiwalled carbon nanotube modified glassy carbon electrode. Bioelectrochem. 80, 114–120 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Zhang H., Meng Z., Wang Q. & Zheng J. A novel glucose biosensor based on direct electrochemistry of glucose oxidase incorporated in biomediated gold nanoparticles-carbon nanotubes composite film. Sens. Actuators, B-Chemical 158, 23–27 (2011). [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information
srep36422-s1.pdf (600.6KB, pdf)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES