Skip to main content
Advanced Science logoLink to Advanced Science
. 2016 May 17;3(11):1600048. doi: 10.1002/advs.201600048

A Porous Metal–Organic Framework Assembled by [Cu30] Nanocages: Serving as Recyclable Catalysts for CO2 Fixation with Aziridines

Hang Xu 1,2, Xiao‐Fang Liu 3, Chun‐Shuai Cao 1,2, Bin Zhao 1,2,, Peng Cheng 1,2, Liang‐Nian He 3,
PMCID: PMC5111788  PMID: 27980985

Abstract

Based on a novel ligand 5‐(2,6‐bis(4‐carboxyphenyl)pyridin‐4‐yl)isophthalic acid (H4BCP) with large skeletons, a unique porous framework {[Cu2(BCP)(H2O)2]·3DMF}n (1) assembled by nano‐sized and censer‐like [Cu30] cages is successfully obtained and structurally characterized. In 1, the large 1D channel in frameworks and window size in the nanocages can enrich methylene blue and capture CO2, exhibiting the promising applications in environmental protection. More importantly, the explorations on the cycloaddition reaction of CO2 and aziridines with various substituents suggest that 1 can serve as an efficient heterogeneous catalyst for CO2 conversion with aziridines in a solvent‐free system, which can be reused at least ten times without any obvious loss in catalytic activity. This is the first example of metal–organic framework (MOF)‐based catalysts in converting CO2 into high‐value oxazolidinones through activating aziridines and CO2, further extending the applications of MOFs materials in catalysis.

Keywords: aziridines, carbon dioxide fixation, metal–organic frameworks, nano‐sized cages, regenerable heterogeneous catalysis

1. Introduction

Environment and energy are crucial issues in our industrialized age, and excessive depletion of fossil energy would generate a large number of pollutants, resulting in a series of social and environmental problems. Carbon dioxide (CO2), as the major waste gas from industrial and human activities, can be considered as one of the main greenhouse gases responsible for global warming.1 Hence, the effective utilization associated with reduction of carbon emission has become an urgent and challenging research topic,2 and many efforts have been directed toward converting CO2 into various valuable chemicals,3 which are currently obtained from fossil fuel resources. One of the effective strategies for CO2 conversion is the coupling reaction of CO2 with aziridines to afford oxazolidinones due to not only high reactivity of aziridines toward CO2 and ideal atom efficiency, but also the important applications of oxazolidinones as chiral auxiliaries, intermediates in organic synthesis, and medical chemistry.4 In such type of reactions, many homogeneous catalysts, such as α‐amino acids, alkali metal halide, and tetraalkylammonium salt, have been investigated and exhibit good activity,5 but comparably, only a few heterogeneous catalysts were employed in this reaction.6 Therefore, to approach practical applications, it is of key importance to design and synthesize efficient and heterogeneous catalysts for CO2 conversion.

On the other hand, porous metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) can be considered as a promising candidate for the catalytic reaction as they have designable structures and modifiable functional groups, well‐defined pores and high surface area, significant capability for CO2 adsorption and excellent recyclable catalytic performance.7, 8, 9, 10 The utilization of MOFs as catalysts for CO2 conversion therefore has received tremendous attention, and several MOFs have already shown high catalytic activity in CO2 conversion with the terminal alkyne activation, the hydroboration and cycloaddition of epoxides.11 However, to the best of our knowledge, MOFs‐based catalysts for CO2 conversion with aziridines still have not been reported so far.

In this contribution, we designed and synthesized a novel low symmetry organic ligand 5‐(2,6‐bis(4‐carboxyphenyl)pyridin‐4‐yl)isophthalic acid (H4BCP, Scheme S1, Supporting Information). Then, a unique 3D framework {[Cu2(BCP)(H2O)2]·3DMF}n (1) assembled by [Cu30] nanocages was obtained and structurally characterized. Importantly, in the cycloaddition reaction of CO2 and aziridines, 1 can act as a highly effective and recoverable catalyst, which can be reused at least ten times without any obvious loss. To our knowledge, it represents the first example of MOFs‐based catalyst for CO2 conversion with aziridines.

2. Results and Discussion

Large organic ligand H4BCP with C 2 symmetry was first synthesized, and the corresponding molecule structure was characterized by single crystal X‐ray diffractions (Table S1, Supporting Information). Based on H4BCP ligand, the green crystals of 1 were obtained by solvothermal methods, and the structural analyses revealed that compound 1 belongs to the trigonal system with space group R3m (Table S1, Supporting Information). The 3D framework of 1 is assembled by the unique nano‐sized [Cu30] cages (Figure 1 b), which are constructed from 15 Cu2(O2CR)4 paddlewheel units and BCP linkers. The shape of [Cu30] cage looks like a distorted censer (Figure S1, Supporting Information), which is distinctive to the reported polyhedral/spherical cages in classic MOFs, for instance, eight [Zn4O] units as vertexes construct a cubic cage in MOF‐5, 24 Zn atoms and 48 methylimidazole linkers form a spherical cage in ZIF‐8, etc.12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 Each [Cu30] cage can be divided into two subcages, big cage A and small cage B (Figure 1b) to describe in details. The cage A is established by 12 Cu2(O2CR)4 paddlewheel units and six BCP4− anions, displaying a distorted hexagonal bipyramid. Both top and bottom in cage A are occupied by three Cu2(O2CR)4 paddlewheel units with the window of 8.1 and 16 Å (Figure S1, Supporting Information), respectively. The middle part of cage A contains six Cu2(O2CR)4 paddlewheel units with apertures of ≈21 Å (Figure S1, Supporting Information). The cage B shares with three Cu2(O2CR)4 paddlewheel units from the bottom of cage A, and six BCP linkers coordinate to another three Cu2(O2CR)4 units into a hexagonal bipyramid with a pore size of 21 Å (Figure S1, Supporting Information). Along the b‐axis and c‐axis directions, compound 1 exhibits irregular 1D channels, and the total potential pore volume is as high as 72.1% calculated by the PLATON program.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

a) The coordination environments of Cu2+ and BCP4− ligand. b) Nano‐sized [Cu30] cage in 1. c) Perspective view of the framework of 1 along the c‐direction. d) 3D framework and 1D channels along the b‐direction.

From the topological point of view, each paddlewheel unit of Cu2(O2CR)4, linking with four BCP4−, can be considered as a 4‐connected node; and each BCP4− anion bridges four Cu2(O2CR)4 unit, thus it also can be regarded as a 4‐connected node. On the basis of this simplification, the resulting network of compound 1 can be described as a (4, 4)‐connected framework with the nbo‐type topology.

Considering the large window size and cavity in [Cu30] cage, the exploration on the sorption of methylene blue (MB) was carried out. First, 20 mg compound 1 was immersed into the MB solution, and the concentration of MB was monitored by UV–vis spectrophotometer. The results revealed that the concentration of MB gradually decreased as the increased time, and MB in the solution was almost completely absorbed after 7 h with the color change from dark blue to colorless (Figure 2 ). The total adsorption of MB can reach up to 205 mg g−1, the high adsorption capacity of MB clearly confirmed the large cages and windows in 1. The results implied that large substrate molecules can enter into the cage, and 1 can provide enough space to conduct the cycloaddition reaction of CO2. Additionally, TGA and CO2 sorption of compound 1 were also investigated (Figures S4 and S6, Supporting Information), being indicative of that porous framework keeps intact until about 270 °C and possesses the capacity of capturing CO2. Therefore, porous material 1 with open Cu2+ as Lewis acidic sites displays the promising application for the coupling reaction of CO2 with aziridines.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

The UV spectra and color change after absorbing MB.

In order to explore the optimized reaction condition, the reactions of CO2 with aziridines under various conditions were investigated (Table 1 ). In the preliminary study, 1‐ethyl‐2‐phenylaziridine (1a) was selected as a model substrate to investigate the influence of temperature on the reaction (Table 1, entries 1–4). At room temperature, the corresponding oxazolidinones of 3‐ethyl‐5‐phenyloxazolidin‐2‐one (2a) and 3‐ethyl‐4‐phenyloxazolidin‐2‐one (3a) were obtained with only 30% yield, and then a significant increase in the yield was observed as temperature increased to 80 °C, indicating that higher temperature can facilitate the cycloaddition reaction. Quantitative yields together with excellent selectivity toward 2a were achieved at 100 °C. However, the yield at 120 °C decreased to 85%, which might be ascribed to the partial decomposition of co‐catalyst tetrabutylammonium bromide (TBAB) in high temperature. As a result, 100 °C is optimal temperature for this reaction, giving the best results. Then the influence of CO2 pressure and the amount of cat. 1 on the reaction were investigated at 100 °C. Under 1 MPa CO2, the yield decreased to 92% (entry 5), which was clearly inferior to the yield with 2 MPa CO2 (entry 3), indicative of that 2 MPa CO2 is a suitable pressure. In terms of catalyst amount, the yield decreased to 89% when the amount of 1 was decreased to 40 mg (entry 6). As a result, the optimized reaction conditions should be 100 °C under 2 MPa CO2 with 80 mg catalyst 1. Then, to explore the catalytic performance of other porous MOFs with paddlewheel Cu2(O2CR)4 units, well‐known HKUST‐1 was selected as catalyst for this reaction. The corresponding yield of 3‐ethyl‐5‐phenyloxazolidin‐2‐one is 95% with good selectivity (Table 1, entry 11), indicating that both of two porous MOFs with paddlewheel Cu2(O2CR)4 units can act as good catalysts for the cycloaddition reaction of CO2 and aziridines. Comparing to HKUST‐1, compound 1 shows a little higher activity, possibly being attributed to the different cage‐like structure and larger porosity in compound 1.

Table 1.

Cycloaddition reaction of CO2 with 1‐ethyl‐2‐phenylaziridine under various conditionsa)

graphic file with name ADVS-3-0g-g005.jpg
Entry Catalyst 1 [mg] T [°C] Yieldb) [%] Regio‐selc)
1 80 25 30 97:3
2 80 80 91 97:3
3 80 100 >99 98:2
4 80 120 85 97:3
5d) 80 100 92 98:2
6 40 100 89 98:2
7e) 0 100 45 92:8
8f) 0 100 43 92:8
9g) 0 100 47 >99
10 0 100 79 98:2
11h) 40 100 95 96:4

a)Reaction conditions: 1‐ethyl‐2‐phenylaziridine (294.4 mg, 2.0 mmol), solvent‐free, catalyst 1, TBAB (32.4 mg, 0.1 mmol), CO2 (2.0 MPa), 12 h, 80 mg catalyst 1 loading (based on metal center, about 10 mol%);

b)Total yield of 2a and 3a determined by 1H NMR using 1,3,5‐trimethoxybenzene as an internal standard;

c)Molar ratio of 2a to 3a;

d)CO2 (1.0 MPa);

e)TBAB (32.4 mg, 0.1 mmol) and Cu(OAc)2 (39.9 mg, 0.2 mmol);

f)TBAB (32.4 mg, 0.1 mmol) and Cu(NO3)2 (37.4 mg, 0.2 mmol);

g)TBAB (32.4 mg, 0.1 mmol) and CuSO4 (31.9 mg, 0.2 mmol);

h)HKUST replaces compound 1 to conduct this reaction, catalyst loading (based on metal center, about 10 mol%).

To further explore and exemplify the catalytic potential of compound 1, several typical aziridines were prepared and subjected to the cycloaddition reaction (detailed characterization data of aziridines in the Supporting Information). Under the optimized reaction conditions, all of the corresponding oxazolidinones were obtained and summarized in Table 2 (entries 1–5). For entries 1–3, aziridines bearing three different groups at the nitrogen atom were tested in cycloaddition reaction. Interestingly, the aziridine with ethyl group on the nitrogen atom (entry 1) displayed the best reactive activity with CO2, possibly because of the relatively low steric hindrance, while other aziridines with larger alkyl groups (entries 2 and 3) were found to have lower catalytic activity. Additionally, keeping R1 as ethyl group, the different substituent groups on phenyl ring were also investigated on the reaction. The corresponding oxazolidinones from 1‐ethyl‐2‐(4‐chlorophenyl)‐aziridine and 1‐ethyl‐2‐(4‐methyl)‐aziridine were obtained with high yields (entries 4 and 5), but 1‐ethyl‐2‐(4‐chlorophenyl)‐aziridine exhibited relatively low activity among the aziridines tested, which might be attributed to the electron‐withdrawing effect of chloride group on the phenyl ring. The results clearly show that compound 1 possesses the capacity of catalyzing cycloaddition reaction with extensive aziridines.

Table 2.

Synthesis of various oxazolidinones from CO2 and aziridines with catalyst 1a)

graphic file with name ADVS-3-0g-g006.jpg
Entry Substrate Conv.b) [%] Yieldb) [%] Regio‐selc)
1 graphic file with name ADVS-3-0g-g007.jpg >99 >99 98:2
2 graphic file with name ADVS-3-0g-g008.jpg 95 93 97:3
3 graphic file with name ADVS-3-0g-g009.jpg 93 92 98:2
4 graphic file with name ADVS-3-0g-g010.jpg >99 88 93:7
5 graphic file with name ADVS-3-0g-g011.jpg >99 92 98:2

a)Reaction conditions: aziridine (2.0 mmol), solvent‐free, 80 mg catalyst 1 loading (based on metal center, about 10 mol%), TBAB (32.4 mg, 0.1 mmol), CO2 (2.0 MPa), 12h;

b)Determined by 1H NMR using 1,3,5‐trimethoxybenzene as an internal standard;

c)Molar ratio of 2 to 3.

Actually, the recyclable performance is an important parameter for heterogeneous catalyst, and compound 1 could be easily separated from the reaction mixture by centrifugation and filtration. Hence, the investigations on the recycle performance of 1 as catalysts were carried out. As shown in Figure 3 , the catalyst can be reused at least ten times without any obvious loss in catalytic activity, indicative of that 1 is more close to practical applications. The powder X‐ray diffraction (PXRD) patterns of used compound 1 revealed that 1 still keeps crystalline state after five cycles and has been transformed into amorphous state after the sixth run (Figure S7, Supporting Information) as following reasons: (a) Generally, the long‐range ordering crystalline state of crystals would lose after drastically stirring, and some peaks in PXRD would gradually broaden and/or weaken. In terms of compound 1, the peaks in PXRD do not disappear after one time repeated reaction, and the intensity of peaks in PXRD gradually decreased after the recycle reaction (Figure S7, Supporting Information), suggesting that the crystalline state of 1 gradually becomes poor and results in amorphous state. (b) The ICP analyses of reaction filtrate revealed that only the trace amount leakage of Cu2+ was observed (Table S2, Supporting Information), indicating that the framework did not decompose after the repeated reaction. (c) X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectrum of the samples after ten times repeated reaction showed that oxidation state of Cu(II) keeps stable in framework 1 (Figure S8, Supporting Information). Therefore, we considered that the framework of 1 gradually transfers from crystalline to amorphous state, and framework is still stable. Thus, the stable framework in amorphous state still shows the well catalytic performance.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Recycle tests with 1 for the cycloaddition reaction of CO2 with 1‐ethyl‐2‐phenylaziridine.

Next step, to investigate the reaction mechanism, the different copper sources were employed in the CO2 fixation reaction as control experiments. First, Cu(OAc)2, Cu(NO3)2, and CuSO4 as catalysts were chosen to replace compound 1 to conduct the reaction, and the yield was just 45%, 43%, and 47%, respectively (Table 1, entries 7–9). The results indicate that free Cu2+ ions did not effectively catalyze the cycloaddition reaction with 1‐ethyl‐2‐phenylaziridine, and the anions in salts also do not have obvious effect on the reaction. To our surprise, the yield of the reaction with TBAB (Table 1, entry 10) is higher than that under Cu‐salts and TBAB, which mainly originates from the binding effect between free Cu2+ and Br to hinder the nucleophilicity of Br ions.21 Comparably, the yield is over 99% when 1 serves as catalysts. The result clearly shows that Cu2+ in the framework of 1 can enhance over 50% catalytic capacity than isolated Cu2+ ions in this reaction. The significant enhancement of catalytic performance maybe benefit from the following factors: (a) 1D channels and nano‐sized [Cu30] cages in 1 can enrich or capture CO2 and substrate molecules, i.e., aziridines, and the increased concentration of reactants can accelerate the reaction; (b) the confinement effect of nano‐sized [Cu30] cages can enhance reactivity with aziridines and CO2; (c) in the stable Cu2(O2CR)4 paddlewheel unit, the steric hindrance around Cu2+ and electric neutrality of the unit effectively impede the coordination between Cu2+ and Br, resulting in more nucleophilic attack of Br on aziridines. Namely, in effectively catalyzing the cycloaddition reaction with aziridines and CO2, both the unique coordination environments of Cu2+ and cage‐like motif in [Cu30] nanocages play a vital role.

Therefore, a possible mechanism for the 1/TBAB‐catalyzed cycloaddition of CO2 with aziridines is proposed. First, the substrate and CO2 are enriched in the nano‐sized [Cu30] cages. Then, the coupling reaction is initiated by coordination of copper site in compound 1 with the nitrogen atom of the aziridine. Second, the nucleophilic attack of Br can lead to the ring opening of the aziridine through two different pathways as represented by path (a) or (b) (Scheme S2, Supporting Information). The Cu2(O2CR)4 paddlewheel units in 1 can stabilize the obtained carbamate salt, which is converted into the corresponding oxazolidinone through intramolecular ring‐closure. In terms of selectivity, the main product 2a originates from ring‐opening of the aziridine at the most substituted carbon, which produced the more stable carbamate salt intermediate. So in most cases, the regioselectivity (molar ratio of carbamate salt) exceeds 90:10. Thus, the corresponding oxazolidinone is obtained with high yield and selectivity under 1 as the catalyst.

3. Conclusion

In conclusion, a unique porous framework 1 with 30‐nuclear copper nanocages was synthesized and structurally characterized, possessing the capacity of capturing MB and CO2, which shows the promising applications in environmental protection field. Importantly, compound 1 was demonstrated as a new type of heterogeneous catalyst for CO2 fixation, acting as an efficient, recyclable, and environmentally friendly material to catalyze the cyclization reaction with aziridines and CO2 in a solvent‐free system. It should be noticed that robust catalyst 1 can be reused at least ten times without any obvious loss in catalytic activity. To our knowledge, it is the first example of MOF‐based catalysts for converting CO2 into oxazolidinones through activating aziridines, which expands the potential applications of MOFs in areas of catalysis and the reduction of CO2.

4. Experimental Section

Synthesis of {[Cu2(BCP)(H2O)2]·3DMF}n ( 1 ): A mixture of Cu(NO3)2 ·3H2O (0.1 mmol, 24.1 mg), H4BCP (0.05 mmol, 24.2 mg), and HNO3 (100 μL) in DMF (5 mL) were sealed in a 10 mL Teflon‐lined stainless steel autoclave. The autoclave was heated at 100 °C for 3 d under autogenous pressure and then cooled to room temperature in 72 h. The green crystals were obtained and washed with DMF. Yield: 82%, based on H4BCP. Anal. calcd for compound 1: C 50.13, H 4.41, N 6.50; Found: C 49.76, H 4.58, N 6.71.

General Procedure for Cycloaddition of Aziridine and CO2: In a 25 mL autoclave reactor equipped with a magnetic stirrer, aziridine (2 mmol), TBAB, and the MOF catalyst were first charged into the reactor. Then CO2 was introduced into the autoclave, followed by stirring at a predetermined temperature for 5 min to reach the equilibrium. The pressure was adjusted to the desired pressure and the mixture was stirred continuously for certain time. After the reaction was complete, the reactor was cooled in ice water and CO2 was ejected slowly. An aliquot of the sample was taken from the resulting mixture and dissolved in dry CH2Cl2 by adding 1,3,5‐trimethoxybenzene as an internal standard for 1H NMR analysis. The residue was purified by column chromatography on silica gel (200–300 mesh, eluting with 8:1 to 1:1 petroleum ether–ethyl acetate) to provide the desired products. The products were further identified by 1H NMR, 13C NMR, and MS, showing good agreement with the assigned structures and were consistent with those reported in the literature22 for the known compounds.

[CCDC 1442640 (1) and 1442639 (H4BCP) contain the supporting crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif.]

Supporting information

As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer reviewed and may be re‐organized for online delivery, but are not copy‐edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors.

Supplementary

Acknowledgements

H.X. and X.‐F.L. contributed equally to this work. This work was supported by the 973 Program (2012CB821702), NSFC (21472103, 21571107, and 21421001), SFC of Tianjin (15JCZDJC37700), 111 project (B12015), and MOE Innovation Team (IRT13022 and IRT‐13R30) of China.

Xu H., Liu Xiao‐Fang, Cao Chun‐Shuai, Zhao B., Cheng P., He Liang‐Nian (2016). A Porous Metal–Organic Framework Assembled by [Cu30] Nanocages: Serving as Recyclable Catalysts for CO2 Fixation with Aziridines. Adv. Sci., 3: 1600048. doi: 10.1002/advs.201600048

Contributor Information

Bin Zhao, Email: zhaobin@nankai.edu.cn.

Liang‐Nian He, Email: heln@nankai.edu.cn.

References

  • 1.a) Figueroa J. D., Fout T., Plasynski S., McIlvried H., Srivastava R. D., Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2008, 2, 9; [Google Scholar]; b) Pervaiz M., Sain M. M., Resour., Conserv. Recycl. 2003, 39, 325. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.a) D'Alessandro D. M., Smit B., Long J. R., Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 6058; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Aresta M., in Carbon Dioxide as Chemical Feedstock (Ed: Aresta M.), Wiley‐VCH, Weinheim, Germany: 2010; [Google Scholar]; c) Sakakura T., Choi J. C., Yasuda H., Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 2365; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Yang Z. Z., He L. N., Gao J., Liu A. H., Yu B., Energy Environ. Sci. 2012, 5, 6602; [Google Scholar]; e) Klaus S., Lehenmeier M. W., Anderson C. E., Rieger B., Coord. Chem. Rev. 2011, 255, 1460. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.a) Paddock R. L., Nguyen S. T., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 11498; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Kayaki Y., Yamamoto M., Ikariya T., Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 4194; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Riduan S. N., Zhang Y., Ying J. Y., Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 3322; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Jacquet O., Das Neves Gomes C., Ephritikhine M., Cantat T., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 2934; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e) Whiteoak C. J., Kielland N., Laserna V., Escudero‐Adán E. C., Martin E., Kleij A. W., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 1228; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f) Correa A., León T., Martin R., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 1062; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; g) Dong J., Cui P., Shi P. F., Cheng P., Zhao B., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 15988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.a) Barbachyn M. R., Ford C. W., Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 2010; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Makhtar T. M., Wright G. D., Chem. Rev. 2005, 105, 529; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Aurelio L., Brownlee R. T. C., Hughus A. B., Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 5823. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.a) Tascedda P., Duñach E., Chem. Commun. 2000, 449; [Google Scholar]; b) Sudo A., Morioka Y., Koizumi E., Sanda F., Endo T., Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 7889; [Google Scholar]; c) Sudo A., Morioka Y., Sanda F., Endo T., Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 1363; [Google Scholar]; d) Jiang H. F., Ye J. W., Qi C. R., Huang L. B., Tetrahedron Lett. 2010, 51, 928. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.a) Kathalikkattil A. C., Tharun J., Roshan R., Soek H. G., Park D. W., Appl. Catal., A 2012, 447, 107; [Google Scholar]; b) Du Y., Wu Y., Liu A. H., He L. N., J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 4709; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Lin X. Z., Yang Z. Z., He L. N., Yuan Z. Y., Green Chem. 2015, 17, 795. [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Eddaoudi M., Kim J., Rosi N., Vodak D., Wachter J., O'Keeffe M., Yaghi O. M., Science 2002, 295, 469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Li J. R., Sculley J., Zhou H. C., Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 869. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Zhang J. P., Chen X. M., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 5516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Gao W. Y., Chrzanowski M., Ma S. Q., Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 5841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.a) Gao W. Y., Chen Y., Niu Y. H., Williams K., Cash L., Perez P. J., Wojtas L., Cai J. F., Chen Y. S., Ma S. Q., Angew. Chem. 2014, 126, 2653; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Liu X. H., Ma J. G., Niu Z., Yang G. M., Cheng P., Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 2615; [Google Scholar]; c) Huang X. Q., Chen Y. F., Lin Z. G., Ren X. Q., Song Y. A., Xu Z. Z., Dong X. M., Li X. G., Hu C. W., Wang B., Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 2624; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Burgun A., Crees R. S., Cole M. L., Doonan C. J., Sumby C. J., Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 11760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Li H. L., Eddaoudi M., O'Keeffe M., Yaghi O. M., Nature 1999, 402, 276. [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Perry J. J. IV, Perman J. A., Zaworotko M. J., Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 1400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Huang X. C., Lin Y. Y., Zhang J. P., Chen X. M., Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 1557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Férey G., Mellot‐Draznieks C., Serre C., Millange F., Dutour J., Surblé S., Margiolaki I., Science 2005, 309, 2040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Kang Y., Wang F., Zhang J., Bu X. H., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 17881. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Wang S., Zhao T. T., Li G. H., Wojtas L., Huo Q. S., Eddaoudi M., Liu Y. L., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 18038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Wu P. Y., Wang J., He C., Zhang X. L., Wang Y. T., Liu T., Duan C. Y., Adv. Funct. Mater. 2012, 22, 1698. [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Lu W. G., Su C. Y., Lu T. B., Jiang L., Chen J. M., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 34.16390108 [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Tu B. B., Pang Q. Q., Ning E. L., Yan W. Q., Qi Y., Wu D. F., Li Q. W., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 13456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.a) Lichtin N. N., Rao K. N., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1961, 83, 2417; [Google Scholar]; b) Wilhelm E., Anthofer M. H., Cokoja M., Markovits I. I. E., Herrmann W. A., Kühn F. E., ChemSusChem 2014, 7, 1357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.a) Wu Y., He L. N., Du Y., Wang J. Q., Miao C. X., Li W., Tetrahedron 2009, 65, 6204; [Google Scholar]; b) Du Y., Wu Y., Liu A. H., He L. N., J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 4709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer reviewed and may be re‐organized for online delivery, but are not copy‐edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors.

Supplementary


Articles from Advanced Science are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES