Skip to main content
PeerJ logoLink to PeerJ
. 2016 Nov 10;4:e2699. doi: 10.7717/peerj.2699

Comparative analysis of the complete chloroplast genome sequences in psammophytic Haloxylon species (Amaranthaceae)

Wenpan Dong 1,2, Chao Xu 1,3, Delu Li 4, Xiaobai Jin 5, Ruili Li 5, Qi Lu 6,, Zhili Suo 1,
Editor: Thiago Venancio
PMCID: PMC5111891  PMID: 27867769

Abstract

The Haloxylon genus belongs to the Amaranthaceae (formerly Chenopodiaceae) family. The small trees or shrubs in this genus are referred to as the King of psammophytic plants, and perform important functions in environmental protection, including wind control and sand fixation in deserts. To better understand these beneficial plants, we sequenced the chloroplast (cp) genomes of Haloxylon ammodendron (HA) and Haloxylon persicum (HP) and conducted comparative genomic analyses on these and two other representative Amaranthaceae species. Similar to other higher plants, we found that the Haloxylon cp genome is a quadripartite, double-stranded, circular DNA molecule of 151,570 bp in HA and 151,586 bp in HP. It contains a pair of inverted repeats (24,171 bp in HA and 24,177 bp in HP) that separate the genome into a large single copy region of 84,214 bp in HA and 84,217 bp in HP, and a small single copy region of 19,014 bp in HA and 19,015 bp in HP. Each Haloxylon cp genome contains 112 genes, including 78 coding, 30 tRNA, and four ribosomal RNA genes. We detected 59 different simple sequence repeat loci, including 44 mono-nucleotide, three di-nucleotide, one tri-nucleotide, and 11 tetra-nucleotide repeats. Comparative analysis revealed only 67 mutations between the two species, including 44 substitutions, 23 insertions/deletions, and two micro-inversions. The two inversions, with lengths of 14 and 3 bp, occur in the petA-psbJ intergenic region and rpl16 intron, respectively, and are predicted to form hairpin structures with repeat sequences of 27 and 19 bp, respectively, at the two ends. The ratio of transitions to transversions was 0.76. These results are valuable for future studies on Haloxylon genetic diversity and will enhance our understanding of the phylogenetic evolution of Amaranthaceae.

Keywords: Chloroplast genome, Psammophytes, Structure, Evolution, Amaranthaceae, Haloxylon

Introduction

The eudicot clade comprises approximately 75% of all flowering land plant species, including major subclades: rosids, asterids, Saxifragales, Santalales, and Caryophyllales (APG III, 2009). Haloxylon species, which include psammophytic small trees or shrubs, are positioned phylogenetically in the Amaranthaceae Juss of the Caryophyllales Perleb among core eudicots (APG III, 2009; Pyankov et al., 2001; Akhani, Edwards & Roalson, 2007). The Haloxylon genus has about 11 species, with a distribution from the Mediterranean through Central Asia and into China (Zhu, Mosyakin & Clemants, 2004). Two Haloxylon species, which are known as the King of psammophytic plants, are found in the deserts of northwest China and, play important roles in environmental protection, including wind control and sand fixation (Zhu, Mosyakin & Clemants, 2004; Jia & Lu, 2004). These precious psammophytic woody plants can adapt to harsh environmental conditions, such as drought, desert, high temperature, and sand storms. However, populations of Haloxylon plants have been threatened in China in past decades as a result of decreased underground water, overgrazing, and over exploitation of agriculture.

Because of the environmental significance of these plants and their declining numbers, genetic research on Haloxylon germplasm resources has garnered significant interest (Song & Jia, 2000; Sheng et al., 2004; Sheng et al., 2005; Zhang et al., 2006a; Zhang et al., 2006b). However, Haloxylon plants possess only fine green assimilating shoots, without leaves, making the evaluation of their phenotypic diversity difficult. Further, the detection of genetic diversity within Haloxylon germplasm resources has been slowed by a lack of morphological markers (Sheng et al., 2004; Sheng et al., 2005; Zhang et al., 2006a; Zhang et al., 2006b; Wang et al., 2009; Suo et al., 2012a). A recent study by Long et al. (2014) used RNA-seq data to elucidate the Haloxylon transcriptome, providing a valuable sequence resource for further genetic and genomic studies; however, genetic information for members of the Haloxylon genus, and how they might differ from one another, is limited.

Each leaf cell of plants contains 1,000–10,000 chloroplasts (cp), which are key organelles for photosynthesis and other biochemical pathways such as the biosynthesis of starch, fatty acids, pigments, and amino acids (Dong et al., 2013b; Raman & Park, 2016). Since the first cp genome of Nicotiana tabacum was sequenced in 1986, around 800 complete cp genome sequences have been made available in the National Center for Biotechnology Information organelle genome database. These data are valuable sources of genetic markers for phylogenetic analyses, genetic diversity evaluation, and plant molecular identification (Dong et al., 2012; Dong et al., 2013a; Dong et al., 2013b; Dong et al., 2014; Ni et al., 2016; Suo et al., 2012b).

There are two published complete cp genome sequences (Spinacia oleracea and Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris) from members of the Amaranthaceae family (Li et al., 2014; Schmitz-Linneweber et al., 2001). However, the determination of the cp genome from Haloxylon plants is of further significance for potentially enhancing our understanding of their adaptability to severe desert environmental conditions, and their genomic evolution within the Amaranthaceae. Here, we report the complete cp genomes from two Haloxylon species, H. ammodendron and H. persicum, including patterns of nucleotide substitutions, microstructural mutation, and simple sequence repeats (SSRs). We further performed genomic comparative analyses on these and two other representative Amaranthaceae species, to better understand the evolutionary relationships within this family.

Materials & Methods

Sampling and DNA extraction

Fresh young shoots of H. ammodendron (HA) and H. persicum (HP) were collected in May 2011 from Minqin Eremophytes Botanical Garden (N38°34′, E102°59′, Altitude 1,378 m), Gansu Province, China (under the leadership of Gansu Desert Control Research Institute, Lanzhou, Gansu, China). These HA and HP plants were originally introduced from the Turpan Desert Botanical Garden of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region. The shoots from each accession were immediately dried using silica gel for future DNA extraction. Total genomic DNA was extracted from each using the Plant Genomic DNA Kit (DP305) from Tiangen Biotech (Beijing) Co., Ltd., China. The approval numbers are 2012BAD16B0101 and 80117B1001 for field permit of the research.

Chloroplast genome sequencing

The HA and HP cp genomes were sequenced using the short-range PCR method reported by Dong et al. (2012), Dong et al. (2013a) and Dong et al. (2013b). The PCR protocol was as follows: preheating at 94 °C for 4 min, 34 cycles at 94 °C for 45 s, annealing at 55 °C for 40 s, and elongation at 72 °C for 1.5 min, followed by a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. PCR amplification was performed in an Applied Biosystems VeritiTM 96-Well Thermal Cycler (Model#: 9902, made in Singapore). The amplicons were sent to Shanghai Majorbio Bio-Pharm Technology Co., Ltd. (Beijing) for Sanger sequencing in both the forward and reverse directions using a 3730xl DNA analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). DNA regions containing poly structures or that were difficult to amplify were further sequenced using newly designed primer pairs for confirming reliable and high quality sequencing results.

Chloroplast genome assembling and annotation

The cp DNA sequences were manually confirmed and assembled using Sequencher (v4.6) software, and cp genome annotation was performed using the Dual Organellar Genome Annotator (DOGMA) (Wyman, Jansen & Boore, 2004). BLASTX and BLASTN searches were utilized to accurately annotate the protein-encoding genes and to identify the locations of the transfer RNAs (tRNAs) and ribosomal RNAs (rRNAs). Gene annotation information from other closely related plant species was also used for confirmation when the boundaries of the introns or exons could not be precisely determined because of the limited power of BLAST in cp genome annotation (e.g., for some short exons of 6–9 nt in length, such as in the case of rps16, petB, and petD). Promoter, intron, and exon boundaries, as well as the location of stop codons for all protein-encoding genes, have been identified accurately. The cp genome map was drawn using Genome Vx software (Conant & Wolfe, 2008) (http://wolfe.ucd.ie/GenomeVx/), and the cp genome sequences have been deposited to GenBank with the following accession numbers: KF534478 for HA and KF534479 for HP (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/?term=Haloxylon+chloroplast+genome).

Repeat structure analysis

Gramene Simple Sequence Repeat Identification Tool software (http://www.gramene.org/db/markers/ssrtool) (Benson, 1999) was utilized to search for simple sequence repeat loci in the cp genome sequences, with the threshold value of repeat number as ≥10 for mono-nucleotide repeats, ≥5 for di-nucleotide repeats, ≥4 for tri-nucleotide repeats, and ≥3 for tetra-nucleotide, penta-nucleotide, or hexa-nucleotide repeats.

Gene content analysis and comparative genomics

The mVISTA program was employed in Shuffle-LAGAN mode (Frazer et al., 2004) to compare the complete HA and HP cp genomes. These were aligned using MUSCLE software (Thompson et al., 1997) and were manually adjusted using Se-Al 2.0 (Rambaut, 1996). Variable sites in the cp genome were calculated using DnaSP (DNA Sequences Polymorphism version 5.10.01) software (Librado & Rozas, 2009), and the genetic distance (p-distance) was computed using MEGA 6.0 software (Tamura et al., 2013). Based on the aligned sequence matrix, the micro-structure events were checked manually and were further divided into three categories: (i) microsatellite-related insertions/deletions (indels), (ii) non-microsatellite-related indels, (iii) and inverted sequences. Using the HA cp genome sequence as the standard reference, the size, location, and evolutionary direction of the microstructure events were counted. The proposed secondary structures of the inverted regions in the cp genomes of HA and HP were analyzed using mfold software (Zuker, 2003). The complete cp genome sequences of S. oleracea (GenBank accession number AJ400848.1, Spinacia L.) (Schmitz-Linneweber et al., 2001) and B. vulgaris subsp. vulgaris (GenBank accession number KJ081864.1, Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris) (Li et al., 2014), two closely related species in the Amaranthaceae family, were downloaded from GenBank databases (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). These were used for comparison with the complete cp genomes of HA and HP.

Results & Discussion

Genome features

Similar to the typical cp genome structure in other higher plants, the Haloxylon cp genome is a double-stranded, circular DNA molecule of 151,570 bp in length in HA and 151,586 bp in length in HP. It also includes a large single copy region (LSC) of 84,214 bp in HA and 84,217 bp in HP and a small single copy region (SSC) of 19,014 bp in HA and 19,015 bp in HP; these are separated by a pair of inverted repeats (IR) (24,171 bp in HA and 24,177 bp in HP) (Fig. 1). The GC content in this IR region is 43.0% in HA and 42.7% in HP, and the GC content in the LSC and SSC regions is 34.4% (LSC) and 29.7% (SSC) in HA and 34.5% (LSC) and 29.7% (SSC) in HP (Table 1).

Figure 1. Representative map of the two Haloxylon chloroplast genomes.

Figure 1

Genome annotation was performed using DOGMA. Genes drawn outside of the circle are transcribed clockwise, whereas those represented inside the circle are transcribed counterclockwise. Small single copy (SSC), large single copy (LSC), and inverted repeat (IRa, IRb) regions are indicated.

Table 1. Summary of complete chloroplast genome features in Haloxylon.

H. ammodendron H. persicum Spinacia oleracea Beta vulgaris
Total cpDNA size 151,570 151,586 150,725 149,635
Length of LSC region 84,214 84,217 82,719 83,057
Length of IR region 24,171 24,177 25,073 24,439
Length of SSC region 19,014 19,015 17,860 17,701
Total GC content (%) 36.6 36.6 36.9 36.4
LSC 34.4 34.5 34.8 34.1
IR 43.0 43.0 42.7 42.2
SSC 29.7 29.7 29.8 29.2
Total number of genes 112 112 112 113
Protein encoding 78 78 78 79
tRNA 30 30 30 30
rRNA 4 4 4 4
Pseudogenes 2 2 2 1

Among the four Amaranthaceae species included in our analyses, which represent three genera, the longest cp genomes (151,570 bp for HA and 151,586 bp for HP) are 1,935 bp to 1,951 bp larger than the shortest one (149,635 bp for B. vulgaris subsp. vulgaris) (Li et al., 2014). The size of the S. oleracea cp genome (150,725 bp) (Schmitz-Linneweber et al., 2001) is intermediate (Table 1). Notably, the cp genomes of HP and HA are quite similar in size; the HP cp is only 16 bp longer than that of HA, with minor differences between them.

There are a total of 112 genes in the Haloxylon cp genome, including 78 coding genes, 18 of which are duplicated genes in the IR region, 30 tRNA genes, and four ribosomal RNA genes (16S, 23S, 5S, 4.5S) (Fig. 1 and Table S1). Based on their predicted functions, these genes can be divided into three categories, (1) genes related to transcription and translation; (2) genes related to photosynthesis; (3) genes related to the biosynthesis of amino acids, fatty acids, etc., and some functionally unknown genes (Table S1). The S. oleracea cp also contains the same 78 protein-coding genes, whereas the cp in B. vulgaris has 79. This species contains an additional gene (rpl23), which is a pseudogene in the other species (Fig. 1 and Table S1). There are 17 genes harboring introns in the cp genomes of the four Amaranthaceae species analyzed (one class I intron, trnL-UUA, and 16 class II introns), and two of these genes, ycf3 and clpP, contain two introns each (Table 2).

Table 2. Genes with introns in Haloxylon ammodendron and H. persicum and length of exons and introns.

Exon I (bp) Intron I Exon II Intron II Exon III
atpF 145(145) 785(784) 410(410)
clpP 71(71) 951(951) 292(292) 601(601) 228(228)
ndhA 553(553) 1090(1090) 533(533)
ndhB 777(777) 675(675) 756(756)
petB 6(6) 801(801) 642(642)
petD 8(8) 722(722) 475(475)
rpl16 399(399) 913(913) 9(9)
rpl2 393(393) 668(668) 435(435)
rpoC1 432(432) 780(780) 1602(1602)
rps12 114(114) 231(231) 27(27)
rps16 40(40) 881(881) 197(197)
trnA-UGC 38(38) 831(831) 42(42)
trnG-GCC 23(23) 722(722) 58(58)
trnI-GAU 42(42) 942(941) 35(35)
trnK-UUU 35(35) 2909(2909) 37(37)
trnL-UAA 35(35) 557(557) 50(50)
trnV-UAC 39(39) 602(602) 35(35)
ycf3 126(126) 772(772) 229(229) 812(812) 152(152)

Notes.

rps12 is trans-spliced with the 5′end located in the LSC region and the duplicated 3′end in the IR regions.

Several angiosperm lineages have lost introns from the rpl2 gene independently (Downie et al., 1991), which could also be regarded as a characteristic feature of the core members of the Caryophyllales (Logacheva et al., 2008). In each of the four Amaranthaceae cp genomes in our analysis, the rpl2 gene has lost its intron. Some authors have proposed that intron loss is not always a dependable marker of phylogenetic relationships (Millen et al., 2001; Dong et al., 2013b; Raman & Park, 2016), and further study, including the sampling of more taxa, is needed to clarify this issue.

Expansion and contraction of the border regions in Haloxylon cp genomes

To analyze these Amaranthaceae species at the genome-level, the sequences of all the four cp genomes were plotted using the VISTA program (Frazer et al., 2004), using the annotation of HA as a reference (Fig. 2). Similar to other angiosperms, we observed that the IR region is more conserved in these species than the LSC and SSC regions.

Figure 2. Identity plot comparing the chloroplast genomes of four Amaranthaceae species using Haloxylon ammodendron as a reference sequence.

Figure 2

The vertical scale indicates the percent identity, ranging from 50% to 100%. The horizontal axis indicates the coordinates within the chloroplast genome. Genomic regions are color coded as protein-coding, rRNA, tRNA, intron, and conserved non-coding sequences (CNS). Abbreviations HP, H. persicum; SO, Spinacia oleracea; BV, Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris.

The expansion and contraction of the border regions between the two IR regions and the single copy region have contributed to genome size variations among plant lineages (Dong et al., 2013b; Goremykin et al., 2003; Ni et al., 2016). Therefore, we next compared the exact IR border positions and their adjacent genes among the four Amaranthaceae cp genomes (Fig. 3). From these data, we see that the IRa/LSC border is generally located upstream of the trnH-GUG gene. The distance between the IRa/LSC border and the trnH-GUG gene is 1 bp in the Haloxylon cp genomes and 2 bp in Beta genus, with no separation in Spinacia (Fig. 3). The IR region is expanded by 763 bp and enters the 5′ end of the ycf1 gene in Haloxylon species, whereas it is expanded by 1,427 bp and 1,492 bp, respectively, in Spinacia and Beta. Except for the expansion of the ycf1 gene, the IR region extends to the rps19 gene in all of four Amaranthaceae cp genomes. The rps19 pseudogene was not observed in this study. Although there are expansions or contractions of IR regions observed among the investigated species of the Amaranthaceae, they contribute little to the overall size differences in the cp genomes. The exon at the 5′ end of the rps12 gene is located in the LSC region, and the intron and 3′-end exon of the gene are situated in the IR region in all four Amaranthaceae species.

Figure 3. Comparison of the junction positions between the single copy and IR regions among four Amaranthaceae genomes.

Figure 3

Indels and SNPs

Indel and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) sites are important molecular features valuable for development of DNA markers that are useful for plant identification and genetic analysis of population structure (Dong et al., 2012; Dong et al., 2013a; Dong et al., 2013b; Dong et al., 2014; Suo et al., 2012b; Suo et al., 2015; Suo et al., 2016). We detected 23 indels in the cp genome sequence alignment of HA and HP, including 16 indels caused by microsatellite repeat variations and seven non-microsatellite-related indels (Table 3). Most of the indel events occurred in non-coding regions (21/23). A large portion of the indels related to microsatellite repeat variations are characterized by a single base mutation; six insertions of this type were observed in the HA cp genome. The non-microsatellite-related indels were found to contain mostly five to six variable base sites, and two insertions of this type were detected in the HA cp genome.

Table 3. Indel mutation events in the chloroplast genomes of Haloxylon ammodendron and H. persicum.

Region Location Types HA HP Length (bp) Directiona
accD-psaI Intergenic Homopolymeric indel A A 2 Insertion
atpA-atpF Intergenic Homopolymeric indel T 1 Insertion
atpF Intron Homopolymeric indel T 1 Deletion
ndhI-ndhA Intergenic Homopolymeric indel A 1 Deletion
ndhJ-ndhK Intergenic Homopolymeric indel T 1 Deletion
psbI-trnS Intergenic Homopolymeric indel T 1 Deletion
psbI-trnS Intergenic Homopolymeric indel A 1 Deletion
rbcL-accD Intergenic Homopolymeric indel A 1 Deletion
rps18-rpl20 Intergenic Homopolymeric indel T 1 Insertion
trnE-trnT Intergenic Homopolymeric indel A 1 Deletion
trnK-rps16 Intergenic Homopolymeric indel A 1 Insertion
trnK-rps16 Intergenic Homopolymeric indel A 1 Insertion
trnL Intron Homopolymeric indel A 1 Deletion
trnL Intron Homopolymeric indel A 1 Insertion
trnL Intron Homopolymeric indel T 1 Deletion
trnR-aptA Intergenic Homopolymeric indel T 1 Deletion
atpH-atpI Intergenic Indel T T T A T T 5 Insertion
clpP-psbB Intergenic Indel G T C T T 5 Deletion
petL-petG Intergenic Indel G 1 Deletion
rpoB-trnC Intergenic Indel T G T A T T 5 Deletion
rpoB-trnC Intergenic Indel T A C A A 5 Insertion
rrn23 Coding Indel A A T T A A 6 Deletion
rrn23 Coding Indel T T A A T T 6 Deletion

Notes.

a

The chloroplast genome of H. ammodendron was used as a standard.

HA
H. ammodendron
HP
H. persicum

Forty-four SNPs were detected in the HA and HP cp genomes (Table 4), which is considerably less than what was found between the cp genomes of other closely related plant species, including Oryza sativa and Oryza nivara (159 SNPs, Masood et al., 2004), Machilus yunnanensis and Machilus balansae (231 SNPs, Song et al., 2015), Citrus sinensis and Citrus aurantiifolia (330 SNPs, Su et al., 2014), Panax ginseng and Palax notoginseng (464 SNPs, Dong et al., 2014), and Solanum tuberosum and Solanum bulbocastanum (591 SNPs, Chung et al., 2006). Of note, the indel and SNP mutation events in the Haloxylon cp genomes were not randomly distributed, but rather, clustered as “hotspots” (Shaw et al., 2007; Worberg et al., 2007). It is likely that such mutational dynamics created the highly variable regions in the genome (Suo et al., 2012b; Song et al., 2015).

Table 4. The nucleotide substitution patterns present in the two Haloxylon chloroplast genomes.

Region Location H. ammodendron H. persicum
atpA Coding G A
atpI Coding T C
matK Coding C A
ndhF Coding C T
ndhI Coding G T
psbC Coding A C
rpoB Coding C T
rpoC2 Coding C A
rpoC2 Coding C G
rpoC2 Coding G T
rps15 Coding A G
rps3 Coding T G
ycf1 Coding A G
ycf1 Coding G C
ycf1 Coding G T
atpB-rbcL Intergenic A C
atpF-atpH Intergenic G C
atpH-atpI Intergenic G A
ndhF-rpl32 Intergenic G T
psaJ-rpl33 Intergenic C T
psaJ-rpl33 Intergenic T A
psbE-petL Intergenic C A
psbM-trnD Intergenic A G
rpl14-rpl16 Intergenic T G
rpl20-rps12 Intergenic G T
rpl33-rps18 Intergenic T C
rpoA-rps11 Intergenic A G
rpoA-rps11 Intergenic T C
rpoB-trnC Intergenic G T
rpoB-trnC Intergenic T G
rps18-rpl20 Intergenic T G
rps8-rpl14 Intergenic G A
trnG-trnR Intergenic A C
trnH-psbA Intergenic T G
trnK-matK Intergenic A C
trnK-rps16 Intergenic A C
trnP-psaJ Intergenic C T
trnP-psaJ Intergenic C T
clpP Intron T G
ndhA Intron T C
rpl16 Intron T C
rps16 Intron T G
trnV Intron T C
ycf3 Intron T C

Patterns of nucleotide substitutions

Overall, the differences between the HA and HP cp genomes are minor, with a genetic distance of 0.00029 between them (Table 4). In total, 44 variable nucleotide sites were detected, 23 of which were found in intergenic regions, six in introns, and 15 in protein-encoding regions.

We also found that the probability of occurrence for the various nucleotide substitutions is different, depending on the mutation, as shown in Fig. 4. The most frequently occurring mutations are from A to C and from T to G (12 times each); mutations from A to T and from T to A exhibited the lowest frequency (only one occurrence of each). The ratio of transitions (Ts) and transversions (Tv) was 0.76 in the cp genome of Haloxylon species.

Figure 4. The nucleotide substitution patterns in the two Haloxylon chloroplast genomes.

Figure 4

The patterns were divided into six types, as indicated by the six non-strand-specific base-substitution types (i.e., numbers of G to A and C to T sites for each respective set of associated mutation types). The H. ammodendron chloroplast genome was used as a standard.

In the gene-encoding regions of the HA and HP cp genomes, a total of 15 variable base sites were detected in 11 protein-encoding genes. Specifically, we found one mutation in each of the following genes: atpA, atpI, matK, ndhF, ndhI, psbC, rpoB, rps15, and rps3. Two genes, rpoC2 and ycf1, each contained three mutation sites (Table 5). These mutations included six Ts and nine Tv. Ten nonsynonymous substitutions occurred simultaneously in seven genes (Table 5).

Table 5. Comparison of the mutational changes, number of transitions (Ts) and transversions (Tv), and synonymous (S) and nonsynonymous (N) substitutions per protein-coding chloroplast gene in Haloxylon ammodendron and H. persicum.

Gene Ts Tv S N
atpA 1 0 1 0
atpI 1 0 1 0
matK 0 1 0 1
ndhF 1 0 0 1
ndhI 0 1 0 1
psbC 0 1 1 0
rpoB 1 0 1 0
rpoC2 0 3 0 3
rps15 1 0 0 1
rps3 0 1 0 1
ycf1 1 2 1 2
Total 6 9 5 10

Repeat structure feature

Simple sequence repeats (SSRs) are also called microsatellites. Within the cp genomes of HA and HP, 59 different SSR loci were detected. Of these, 44 loci are mono-nucleotide repeats, three are di-nucleotide repeats, one is a tri-nucleotide repeat, and 11 are tetra-nucleotide repeats; penta-nucleotide repeats or those containing a higher number of nucleotide repeats were not detected. Among the SSR loci detected, the most frequently observed repeats were A/ T and A T/ T A, accounting for 77.97% of the total number of SSR loci (Table 6). By comparison, in the cp genomes of M. yunnanensis and M. balansae, 36 SSR loci were identified (Song et al., 2015).

Table 6. Location of repeats in the Haloxylon ammodendron chloroplast genome.

No. Location Motif No. of repeats SSR start SSR end
1 trnK-matK A 11 1,658 1,668
2 trnK-rps16 A 12 4,210 4,221
3 rps16-trnQ A 10 6,461 6,470
4 trnQ-psbK A 10 6,957 6,966
5 psbK-psbI A 10 7,578 7,587
6 psbI-trnS A 12 7,854 7,865
7 atpF intron A 10 12,476 12,485
8 rpoC1 intron A 10 22,386 22,395
9 trnE-trnT A 10 31,169 31,178
10 trnL-intron A 12 47,464 47,475
11 trnF-ndhJ A 10 48,982 48,991
12 rbcL-accD A 12 57,323 57,334
13 accD-psaI A 10 59,584 59,593
14 psbF A 10 64,309 64,318
15 clpP intron A 10 71,717 71,726
16 petB intron A 18 75,505 75,522
17 ndhI-ndhA A 10 118,705 118,714
18 psaA C 10 40,165 40,174
19 trnK-rps16 T 10 4,464 4,473
20 psbI-trnS T 10 7,745 7,754
21 trnR-atpA T 11 9,948 9,958
22 atpA-atpF T 10 11,532 11,541
23 atpF intron T 11 12,457 12,467
24 rps2-rpoC2 T 11 15,957 15,967
25 rps2-rpoC2 T 11 18,156 18,166
26 rpoB T 10 25,865 25,874
27 trnD-trnY T 10 30,323 30,332
28 trnL-trnF T 10 48,029 48,038
29 ndhJ-ndhK T 10 49,646 49,655
30 trnV intron T 15 52,214 52,228
31 trnM-atpE T 10 52,658 52,667
32 rbcL-accD T 14 57,377 57,390
33 petL-petG T 10 66,141 66,150
34 psaJ-rpl33 T 12 67,499 67,510
35 rps18-rpl20 T 10 68,447 68,456
36 rpoA T 10 78,219 78,228
37 rps11-rpl36 T 12 79,577 79,588
38 rpl32-trnL T 11 11,2371 11,2381
39 ndhA intron T 12 119,581 119,592
40 ndhA intron T 10 119,793 119,802
41 ycf1 T 12 125,285 125,296
42 ycf1 T 10 125,890 125,899
43 ycf1 T 14 126,895 126,908
44 ycf1 T 10 127,195 127,204
45 rps16-trnQ A T 5 6,277 6,286
46 trnS-trnG A T 5 8,177 8,186
47 trnS-trnG A T 5 8,300 8,309
48 trnN-ndhF T A A 4 109,380 109,391
49 psbA-trnK T T G T 3 1,522 1,533
50 matK-trnK T T C T 3 3,873 3,884
51 atpI-rps2 A T T A 3 15,121 15,132
52 trnE-trnY A T T A 3 31,084 31,095
53 accD-psaI T A A T 4 59,721 59,736
54 rps18-rpl20 T T T A 3 68,474 68,485
55 clpP intron T T T C 3 71,598 71,609
56 rrn23 A G G T 3 104,481 104,492
57 trnL-ccsA A A C C 3 113,312 113,323
58 ycf1 T A A T 3 124,297 124,308
59 rrn23 C TA C 3 131,310 131,321

Inversions

Inversions are important events in the evolution of plant cp genomes. Smaller inversions are less frequent in these genomes, and they are generally associated with hairpins (Fig. 5). Most inversions are found in spacers and introns, and in most cases, the presence/absence of inversions is highly homoplastic during cp genome evolution (Kim & Lee, 2005; Catalano, Saidman & Vilardi, 2009), even at the population level (Quandt & Stech, 2004). A sequence alignment of the Haloxylon cp genomes revealed that an inversion event of 14 bp and one of 3 bp occur in the petA-psbJ intergenic region and in the rpl16 intron, respectively. The two inverted sequences are predicted to form secondary hairpin structures, with repeat sequences of 27 bp and 19 bp at the two ends, respectively (Fig. 5).

Figure 5. The hairpin loops predicted to be formed by inversions in the Haloxylon chloroplast genomes.

Figure 5

Pseudogenes

Pseudogenes have been defined as nonfunctional regions of genomic DNA that originally derived from functional genes (Balakirev & Ayala, 2003). These are evolutionary relics of functional components in the genome that provide important information regarding the history of the gene and genome evolution (Balakirev & Ayala, 2003; Zou et al., 2009; Choi & Park, 2015). The rpl22 and rps18 genes are putative pseudogenes in the Paeoniaceae (Dong et al., 2013b), whereas the atpB gene is a pseudogene in Aster spathulifolius. Conversely, the rpl22, rps18, and atpB genes are predicted to be normal and functional in the Haloxylon species, whereas rpl23 is a present as a pseudogene in the Haloxylon cp genomes (Fig. 1 and Table S1).

Conclusions

Two Haloxylon cp genomes were sequenced and characterized for the first time, and we found that they share the same overall organization and gene content found in most angiosperm cp genomes, including that of the closely related Spinacia and Beta species. The location and distribution of repeat sequences and differing nucleotide mutation sites between the two cp genomes were identified. The LSC/IRB/SSC/IRA boundary regions of the Amaranthaceae cp genomes were compared, and lightly intense variations were identified within the genus Haloxylon. The complete Haloxylon cp genome sequences reported here enhance the genomic information available for the Amaranthaceae family and further contribute to the study of germplasm diversity. These data represent a valuable source of markers for future research on Haloxylon population genetics.

Supplemental Information

Table S1. Genes found in the Haloxylon chloroplast genomes.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2699/supp-1

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Prof. Borong Pan for advice and helpful discussion.

Funding Statement

This study was financially supported by the China National Science and Technology Plan Project (2012BAD16B0101), the “948 Program” (No. 2008-4-47), the Identification and Screening of Haloxylon Germplasm Resources (80117B1001), the State Forestry Administration “Public Welfare Research Foundation” (No. 201004010), the Scientific and Technological Support Project from the Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology (2006BAD26B0101), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 30972412), the joint projects No. 70009C1020 and 70009C1036, and the National Forest Genetic Resources Platform (2005DKA21003). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Contributor Information

Qi Lu, Email: Luqi@caf.ac.cn.

Zhili Suo, Email: zlsuo@ibcas.ac.cn.

Additional Information and Declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare there are no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Wenpan Dong conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Chao Xu analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Delu Li contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Xiaobai Jin wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Ruili Li prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Qi Lu conceived and designed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Zhili Suo conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Field Study Permissions

The following information was supplied relating to field study approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

Minqin Eremophytes Botanical Garden, Gansu Province, China (under the leadership of Gansu Desert Control Research Institute, Gansu, China).

The approval numbers are 2012BAD16B0101 and 80117B1001.

DNA Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding the deposition of DNA sequences:

The chloroplast genome sequences have been deposited to GenBank with the following accession numbers: KF534478 for Haloxylon ammodendron and KF534479 for Haloxylon persicum.

References

  • Akhani, Edwards & Roalson (2007).Akhani H, Edwards G, Roalson EH. Diversification of the old world Salsoleae s.l. (Chenopodiaceae): molecular phylogenetic analysis of nuclear and chloroplast data sets and a revised classification. International Journal of Plant Sciences. 2007;168:931–956. doi: 10.1086/518263. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • APG III (2009).APG III An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG III. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society. 2009;161:105–121. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8339.2009.00996.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Balakirev & Ayala (2003).Balakirev ES, Ayala FJ. Psuedogenes: are they junk or functional DNA? Annual Review of Genetics. 2003;37:123–151. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genet.37.040103.103949. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Benson (1999).Benson G. Tandem repeats finder: a program to analyze DNA sequences. Nucleic Acid Research. 1999;27(2):573–580. doi: 10.1093/nar/27.2.573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Catalano, Saidman & Vilardi (2009).Catalano SA, Saidman BO, Vilardi JC. Evolution of small inversions in chloroplast genome: a case study from a recurrent inversion in angiosperms. Cladistics. 2009;25:93–104. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2008.00236.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Choi & Park (2015).Choi KS, Park SJ. The complete chloroplast genome sequence of Aster spathulifolius (Asteraceae): genomic features and relationship with Asteraceae. Gene. 2015;572:214–221. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2015.07.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Chung et al. (2006).Chung HJ, Jung JD, Park HW, Kim JH, Cha HW, Min SR, Jeong WJ, Liu JR. The complete chloroplast genome sequences of Solanum tuberosum and comparative analysis with Solanaceae species identified the presence of a 241-bp deletion in cultivated potato chloroplast DNA sequence. Plant Cell Reports. 2006;25:1369–1379. doi: 10.1007/s00299-006-0196-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Conant & Wolfe (2008).Conant GC, Wolfe KH. GenomeVx: simple web-based creation of editable circular chromosome maps. Bioinformatics. 2008;24(6):861–862. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Dong et al. (2014).Dong WP, Liu H, Xu C, Zuo YJ, Chen ZJ, Zhou SL. A chloroplast genomic strategy for designing taxon specific DNA mini-barcodes: a case study on ginsengs. BMC Genetics. 2014;15:138. doi: 10.1186/s12863-014-0138-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Dong et al. (2012).Dong WP, Liu J, Yu J, Wang L, Zhou SL. Highly variable chloroplast markers for evaluating plant phylogeny at low taxonomic levels and for DNA barcoding. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(4):e35071. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Dong et al. (2013a).Dong WP, Xu C, Cheng T, Lin K, Zhou SL. Sequencing angiosperm plastid genomes made easy: a complete set of universal primers and a case study on the phylogeny of Saxifragales. Genome Biology and Evolution. 2013a;5(5):989–997. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evt063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Dong et al. (2013b).Dong WP, Xu C, Cheng T, Zhou SL. Complete chloroplast genome of Sedum sarmentosum and chloroplast genome evolution in Saxifragales. PLoS ONE. 2013b;8(10):e77965. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Downie et al. (1991).Downie SR, Olmstead RG, Zurawski G, Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Watson JC, Palme JD. Six independent losses of the chloroplast DNA rpl2 intron in dicotyledons: molecular and phylogenetic implications. Evolution. 1991;45:1245–1259. doi: 10.2307/2409731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Frazer et al. (2004).Frazer KA, Pachter L, Poliakov A, Rubin EM, Dubchak I. VISTA: computational tools for comparative genomics. Nucleic Acids Research. 2004;32:W273–W279. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Goremykin et al. (2003).Goremykin VV, Hirsch-Ernst KI, Wolfl S, Hellwig FH. Analysis of the Amborella trichopoda chloroplast genome sequence suggests that Amborella is not a basal angiosperm. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2003;20:1499–1505. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msg159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Jia & Lu (2004).Jia ZQ, Lu Q. China Environmental Science Press; Beijing: 2004. Haloxylon Bunge. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  • Kim & Lee (2005).Kim KJ, Lee HL. Wide spread occurrence of small inversions in the chloroplast genomes of land plants. Molecules and Cells. 2005;19:104–113. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Li et al. (2014).Li H, Cao H, Cai YF, Wang JH, Qu SP, Huang XQ. The complete chloroplast genome sequence of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris ssp. vulgaris) Mitochondrial DNA. 2014;25:209–211. doi: 10.3109/19401736.2014.883611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Librado & Rozas (2009).Librado P, Rozas J. DnaSP v5: a software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:1451–1452. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Logacheva et al. (2008).Logacheva MD, Samigullin TH, Dhingra A, Penin AA. Comparative chloroplast genomics and phylogenetics of Fagopyrum esculentum ssp. ancestrale—a wild ancestor of cultivated buckwheat. BMC Plant Biology. 2008;8:59. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-8-59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Long et al. (2014).Long Y, Zhang J, Tian X, Wu SS, Zhang Q, Zhang JP, Dang ZH, Pei XW. De novo assembly of the desert tree Haloxylon ammodendron (CA Mey.) based on RNA-Seq data provides insight into drought response, gene discovery and marker identification. BMC Genomics. 2014;15:1111. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-1111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Masood et al. (2004).Masood MS, Nishikawa T, Fukuoka S, Njenga PK, Tsudzuki T, Kadowaki K. The complete nucleotide sequence of wild rice (Oryza nivara) chloroplast genome: first genome wide comparative sequence analysis of wild and cultivated rice. Gene. 2004;340:133–139. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2004.06.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Millen et al. (2001).Millen RS, Olmstead RG, Adams KL, Palmer JD, Lao NT, Heggie L, Kavanaghd TA, Hibberde JM, Graye JC, Mordenf CW, Calieg PJ, Jermiinh LS, Wolfe KH. Many parallel losses of inf A from chloroplast DNA during angiosperm evolution with multiple independent transfers to the nucleus. The Plant Cell. 2001;13:645–658. doi: 10.1105/tpc.13.3.645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ni et al. (2016).Ni LH, Zhao ZL, Xua HX, Chen SL, Dorje G. The complete chloroplast genome of Gentiana straminea (Gentianaceae), an endemic species to the Sino-Himalayan subregion. Gene. 2016;577:281–288. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2015.12.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Pyankov et al. (2001).Pyankov VI, Artyusheva EG, Edwards GE, Black CCJR, Soltis PS. Phylogenetic analysis of tribe Salsoleae (Chenopodiaceae) based on ribosomal ITS sequences: implications for the evolution of photosynthesis types. American Journal of Botany. 2001;88(7):1189–1198. doi: 10.2307/3558329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Quandt & Stech (2004).Quandt D, Stech M. Molecular evolution and phylogenetic utility of the chloroplast trnT-trnF region in bryophytes. Plant Biology. 2004;6:545–554. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-821144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Raman & Park (2016).Raman G, Park S. The complete chloroplast genome sequence of Ampelopsis: gene organization, comparative analysis, and phylogenetic relationships to other angiosperms. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2016;7:341. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Rambaut (1996).Rambaut A. Se-Al: sequence alignment editor. Version 2.0 University of Oxford, Department of Zoology; Oxford: 1996. [Google Scholar]
  • Schmitz-Linneweber et al. (2001).Schmitz-Linneweber C, Maier RM, Alcaraz JP, Cottet A, Herrmann RG, Mache R. The plastid chromosome of spinach (Spinacia oleracea): complete nucleotide sequence and gene organization. Plant Molecular Biology. 2001;45:307–315. doi: 10.1023/A:1006478403810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Shaw et al. (2007).Shaw J, Lickey EB, Schilling EE, Small RL. Comparison of whole chloroplast genome sequences to choose non-coding regions for phylogenetic studies in angiosperms: the tortoise and the hare III. American Journal of Botany. 2007;94:275–288. doi: 10.3732/ajb.94.3.275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sheng et al. (2004).Sheng Y, Zheng WH, Quan PK, Ma KP. Population genetic structure of a dominant desert tree, Haloxylon ammodendron (Chenopodiaceae), in the southeast Gurbantunggut desert detected by RAPD and ISSR markers. Acta Botanica Sinica. 2004;46:675–681. (in Chinese with English Abstract) [Google Scholar]
  • Sheng et al. (2005).Sheng Y, Zheng WH, Quan PK, Ma KP. Genetic variation within and among populations of a dominant desert tree Haloxylon ammodendron (Amaranthaceae) in China. Annals of Botany. 2005;96:245–252. doi: 10.1093/aob/mci171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Song et al. (2015).Song Y, Dong W, Liu B, Xu C, Yao X, Gao J, Corlett RT. Comparative analysis of complete chloroplast genome sequences of two tropical trees Machilus yunnanensis and Machilus balansae in the family Lauraceae. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2015;6:662. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00662. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Song & Jia (2000).Song CS, Jia KF. Scientific survey of Wulate Haloxylon ammodendron forest nature reserve (The series of nature reserve) China Forestry Publishing House; Beijing: 2000. (in Chinese with English Overview) [Google Scholar]
  • Su et al. (2014).Su HJ, Hogenhout SA, Al-Sadi AM, Kuo CH. Complete chloroplast genome sequence of omani lime (Citrus aurantiifolia) and comparative analysis within the Rosids. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e113049. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Suo et al. (2015).Suo ZL, Chen LN, Pei D, Jin XB, Zhang HJ. A new nuclear DNA marker from ubiquitin ligase gene region for genetic diversity detection of walnut germplasm resources. Biotechnology Reports. 2015;5:40–45. doi: 10.1016/j.btre.2014.11.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Suo et al. (2012a).Suo ZL, Jia ZQ, Lu Q, Pan BR, Jin XB, Xu G, Peng XQ, Sun HB, Tao YH. Distinguishing Haloxylon persicum and H. ammodendron (Haloxylon Bunge, Amaranthaceae) using DNA Marker. AASRI Procedia. 2012a;1:305–310. [Google Scholar]
  • Suo et al. (2016).Suo ZL, Li WY, Jin XB, Zhang HJ. A new nuclear DNA marker revealing both microsatellite variations and single nucleotide polymorphic loci: a case study on classification of cultivars in Lagerstroemia indica L. Journal of Microbial & Biochemical Technology. 2016;8:266–271. doi: 10.4172/1948-5948.1000296. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Suo et al. (2012b).Suo ZL, Zhang CH, Zheng YQ, He LX, Jin XB, Hou BX, Li JJ. Revealing genetic diversity of tree peonies at micro-evolution level with hyper-variable chloroplast markers and floral traits. Plant Cell Reports. 2012b;31:2199–2213. doi: 10.1007/s00299-012-1330-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Tamura et al. (2013).Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2013;30:2725–2729. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Thompson et al. (1997).Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG. The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Research. 1997;25:4876–4882. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.24.4876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wang et al. (2009).Wang XM, Yang DY, Tian YZ, Zhang BW, Tu PF, Sun QS, Li XB. Inter-simple sequence repeats analysis of Haloxylon ammodendron from seeds carried back by Shenzhou No. 4 spaceship. Journal of Northwest University. 2009;39:259–263. (in Chinese with English Abstract) [Google Scholar]
  • Worberg et al. (2007).Worberg A, Quandt D, Barniske AM, Lohne C, Hilu KW, Borsch T. Phylogeny of basal eudicots: insights from non-coding and rapidly evolving DNA. Organisms Diversity & Evolution. 2007;7:55–77. doi: 10.1016/j.ode.2006.08.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Wyman, Jansen & Boore (2004).Wyman SK, Jansen RK, Boore JL. Automatic annotation of organellar genomes with DOGMA. Bioinformatics. 2004;20:3252–3255. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhang et al. (2006a).Zhang P, Dong YZ, Wei Y, Hu CZ. ISSR analysis of genetic diversity of Haloxylon ammodendron (CA Mey.) Bunge in Xinjiang. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica. 2006a;26:1337–1341. (in Chinese with English Abstract) [Google Scholar]
  • Zhang et al. (2006b).Zhang P, Dong YZ, Wei Y, Hu CZ. Analysis of genetic diversity of Haloxylon persicum (Chenopodiaceae) in Xinjiang by ISSR. Acta Botanica Yunnanica. 2006b;28:359–362. (in Chinese with English Abstract) [Google Scholar]
  • Zhu, Mosyakin & Clemants (2004).Zhu GL, Mosyakin SL, Clemants SE. Haloxylon Bunge (Chenopodiaceae) In: Flora of China Editorial Committee, editor. Flora of China. Vol. 5. Science Press, Beijing/Missouri Botanic Garden Press; St. Louis: 2004. pp. 395–396. [Google Scholar]
  • Zou et al. (2009).Zou SH, Lehti-Shiu MD, Thibaud-Nissen F, Prakash T, Buell CR, Shiu SH. Evolutionary and expression signatures of pseudogenes in Arabidopsis and rice. Plant Physiology. 2009;151:3–15. doi: 10.1104/pp.109.140632. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zuker (2003).Zuker M. Mfold web server for nucleic acid folding and hybridization prediction. Nucleic Acids Research. 2003;31:3406–3415. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Table S1. Genes found in the Haloxylon chloroplast genomes.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2699/supp-1

Articles from PeerJ are provided here courtesy of PeerJ, Inc

RESOURCES