Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications
. 2016 Aug 2;72(Pt 9):1239–1241. doi: 10.1107/S2056989016012196

Crystal structure of 1-amino-2-oxo-2,5,6,7,8,9-hexa­hydro-1H-cyclo­hepta­[b]pyridine-3-carbo­nitrile

Galal H Elgemeie a, Peter G Jones b,*
PMCID: PMC5120696  PMID: 27920906

In the title compound the seven-membered ring adopts a conformation such that the three atoms not involved in the aromatic plane lie on the same side of that plane. One hydrazinic H atom forms an intra­molecular hydrogen bond to the O atom; the other forms a classical inter­molecular hydrogen bond N—H⋯O, which combines with a ‘weak’ Har⋯O inter­action to build up double layers of mol­ecules parallel to the bc plane.

Keywords: crystal structure, cyclo­hepta­[b]pyridine, carbo­nitrile, N—NH2 group, tautomer, N—H⋯O hydrogen bonding

Abstract

In the title compound, C11H13N3O, the seven-membered ring adopts a conformation such that the three atoms not involved in the aromatic plane lie on the same side of that plane. One hydrazinic H atom forms an intra­molecular hydrogen bond to the O atom; the other forms a classical inter­molecular hydrogen bond N—H⋯O, which combines with a ‘weak’ Har⋯O inter­action to build up double layers of mol­ecules parallel to the bc plane.

Chemical context  

We have recently described various novel approaches for the synthesis of a new class of N-substituted amino derivatives of pyridines and pyrimidines (Elgemeie, Salah et al., 2015; Elgemeie et al., 2016). These compounds are important as pyrimidine ring systems that are not nucleoside analogs, and are inter­esting as anti­metabolic agents (Elgemeie & Hamed, 2014; Elgemeie & Abd Elaziz, 2015). They have a greater selectivity for a broader range of human tumors, hence our inter­est in this class of compounds (Elgemeie, Abou-Zeid et al., 2015; Elgemeie, Mohamed et al., 2015). graphic file with name e-72-01239-scheme1.jpg

We report here a novel one-step synthesis of a cyclo­heptane-ring-fused N-amino-2-pyridone derivative by reaction of the sodium salt of 2-(hy­droxy­methyl­ene)-1-cyclo­hepta­none (1) with a cyano­acetohydrazide (2). Thus, (1) reacted with (2) in piperidine acetate to give a product of mol­ecular formula C11H13N3O (M + = 203), for which two isomeric structures, (3) and (4), seemed possible, corres­ponding to two possible modes of cyclization. Spectroscopic data cannot differentiate between these structures, and therefore the crystal structure was determined, confirming the exclusive presence of tautomer (3) in the solid state. The formation of (3) from the reaction of (1) and (2) is assumed to proceed via initial addition of the active methyl­ene carbon atom of (2) to the formyl group of (1) to give the favoured, kinetically controlled product (3). The 1H NMR spectra of the product revealed the presence of an N—NH2 group at δ = 6.4 p.p.m. and a pyridine H-4 at 7.8 p.p.m. in solution.

Structural commentary  

The structure of the title compound is shown in Fig. 1 and confirms the presence of tautomer (3) in the solid state. Mol­ecular dimensions [e.g. the hydrazinic N1—N2 bond length of 1.4201 (15) Å] may be regarded as normal; an extensive structural investigation of alkyl-substituted 3-cyano-2-pyridones (with an unsubstituted NH function in the ring) was published by Fischer et al. (2004). The seven-membered ring adopts a conformation such that all three atoms C6, C7 and C8 lie to the same side of the plane formed by the pyridone ring together with C5 and C9; the respective deviations from this plane are 1.480 (2), 1.616 (3) and 1.470 (2) Å.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The mol­ecular structure of the title compound, with atom labelling. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level. The intra­molecular N—H⋯O hydrogen bond is shown as a dashed line (see Table 1)

Supra­molecular features  

The classical hydrogen-bond donor N1—H01 is only involved in intra­molecular hydrogen bonding (Fig. 1 and Table 1). The second such donor N1—H02 forms a classical hydrogen bond to the acceptor O1 of a neighbouring mol­ecule related by the 21 screw axis. Additionally, the ‘weak’ but quite short hydrogen bond C4—H4⋯O1 links mol­ecules related by the c glide plane. The overall effect is to build up double layers of mol­ecules (Fig. 2 and Table 1) parallel to the bc plane, in which the top and bottom mol­ecules of the layer are related by inversion.

Table 1. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N2—H01⋯O1 0.90 (2) 2.05 (2) 2.6255 (15) 120.4 (16)
N2—H02⋯O1i 0.91 (2) 2.16 (2) 3.0225 (15) 158.2 (17)
C4—H4⋯O1ii 0.95 2.45 3.2105 (16) 137
C9—H9A⋯O1i 0.99 2.63 3.4903 (16) 146

Symmetry codes: (i) Inline graphic; (ii) Inline graphic.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Crystal packing of the title compound, viewed approximately normal to the bc plane. Dashed lines indicate the hydrogen bonds (see Table 1), and for clarity H atoms not involved in hydrogen bonding have been omitted.

Database survey  

A search of the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD, Version 5.37, last update May 2016; Groom et al., 2016) revealed four other examples of the cyclo­hepta­[b]pyridin-2-one ring system: refcodes AHEQAF (Elgemeie et al., 2002), ATUYAP and IBATUB (Albov et al., 2004a ,b) and QAHLOB (Fischer et al., 2004).

Synthesis and crystallization  

A solution of the sodium salt of 2-(hy­droxy­methyl­ene)-1-cyclo­hepta­none [(1); 1.60 g, 0.01 mol], N-cyano­acetohydrazide [(2); 0.09 g, 0.01 mol] and piperidine acetate (1 ml) in water (30 ml) and ethanol (30 ml) was refluxed for 10 min. Acetic acid (1.5 ml) was added to the hot solution. The precipitated solid was collected by filtration and crystallized from ethanol, giving colourless plate-like crystals (yield 85%, m.p. 508 K).

Refinement  

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 2. The NH hydrogens were located in a difference Fourier map and freely refined. The C-bound H atoms were included using a riding model starting from calculated positions: C—H = 0.95–0.99 Å with U iso(H) = 1.2U eq(C).

Table 2. Experimental details.

Crystal data
Chemical formula C11H13N3O
M r 203.24
Crystal system, space group Monoclinic, P21/c
Temperature (K) 100
a, b, c (Å) 8.5680 (4), 10.0475 (4), 11.6778 (5)
β (°) 103.272 (4)
V3) 978.46 (7)
Z 4
Radiation type Cu Kα
μ (mm−1) 0.74
Crystal size (mm) 0.10 × 0.10 × 0.05
 
Data collection
Diffractometer Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur Atlas Nova
Absorption correction Multi-scan (CrysAlis PRO; Agilent, 2010)
T min, T max 0.795, 1.000
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections 19833, 2046, 1674
R int 0.062
(sin θ/λ)max−1) 0.630
 
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)], wR(F 2), S 0.039, 0.109, 1.06
No. of reflections 2046
No. of parameters 144
H-atom treatment H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) 0.28, −0.30

Computer programs: (CrysAlis PRO; Agilent, 2010), SHELXS97 and SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008) and XP (Siemens, 1994).

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989016012196/su5315sup1.cif

e-72-01239-sup1.cif (20.5KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989016012196/su5315Isup2.hkl

e-72-01239-Isup2.hkl (100.7KB, hkl)

Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989016012196/su5315Isup3.cml

CCDC reference: 1496294

Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

supplementary crystallographic information

Crystal data

C11H13N3O F(000) = 432
Mr = 203.24 Dx = 1.380 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/c Cu Kα radiation, λ = 1.54184 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybc Cell parameters from 6583 reflections
a = 8.5680 (4) Å θ = 3.9–76.1°
b = 10.0475 (4) Å µ = 0.74 mm1
c = 11.6778 (5) Å T = 100 K
β = 103.272 (4)° Plate, colourless
V = 978.46 (7) Å3 0.10 × 0.10 × 0.05 mm
Z = 4

Data collection

Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur Atlas Nova diffractometer 2046 independent reflections
Radiation source: sealed X-ray tube, Nova (Cu) X-ray Source 1674 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Mirror monochromator Rint = 0.062
Detector resolution: 10.3543 pixels mm-1 θmax = 76.1°, θmin = 5.3°
ω–scan h = −10→10
Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrysAlis PRO; Agilent, 2010) k = −12→12
Tmin = 0.795, Tmax = 1.000 l = −14→14
19833 measured reflections

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: full Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.039 Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.109 H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.06 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0602P)2 + 0.2053P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2046 reflections (Δ/σ)max < 0.001
144 parameters Δρmax = 0.28 e Å3
0 restraints Δρmin = −0.30 e Å3

Special details

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes. Least-squares planes (x,y,z in crystal coordinates) and deviations from them (* indicates atom used to define plane) 8.5275 (0.0007) x + 0.7466 (0.0052) y - 3.3783 (0.0058) z = 0.3993 (0.0040) * -0.0117 (0.0008) N1 * 0.0031 (0.0009) C2 * 0.0072 (0.0009) C3 * -0.0090 (0.0009) C4 * 0.0007 (0.0009) C4A * 0.0097 (0.0009) C9A 1.4803 (0.0024) C6 1.6155 (0.0026) C7 1.4700 (0.0023) C8 Rms deviation of fitted atoms = 0.0079
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2sigma(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
N1 0.14967 (13) 0.49677 (10) 0.37289 (9) 0.0161 (3)
C2 0.13750 (15) 0.63589 (13) 0.36852 (11) 0.0168 (3)
C3 0.17684 (15) 0.69947 (13) 0.48064 (12) 0.0168 (3)
C4 0.22210 (15) 0.62730 (13) 0.58375 (11) 0.0173 (3)
H4 0.2451 0.6727 0.6571 0.021*
C4A 0.23457 (16) 0.48899 (13) 0.58178 (11) 0.0169 (3)
C5 0.29860 (17) 0.41294 (13) 0.69430 (11) 0.0197 (3)
H5A 0.2243 0.3391 0.7000 0.024*
H5B 0.3025 0.4729 0.7622 0.024*
C6 0.46697 (17) 0.35590 (14) 0.70100 (12) 0.0218 (3)
H6A 0.5315 0.4231 0.6703 0.026*
H6B 0.5197 0.3395 0.7845 0.026*
C7 0.46682 (17) 0.22636 (14) 0.63197 (12) 0.0212 (3)
H7A 0.5787 0.1942 0.6447 0.025*
H7B 0.4055 0.1587 0.6651 0.025*
C8 0.39649 (16) 0.23537 (13) 0.49953 (12) 0.0199 (3)
H8A 0.4085 0.1478 0.4637 0.024*
H8B 0.4596 0.3008 0.4656 0.024*
C9 0.21817 (16) 0.27618 (13) 0.46552 (12) 0.0186 (3)
H9A 0.1708 0.2467 0.3841 0.022*
H9B 0.1597 0.2312 0.5185 0.022*
C9A 0.19855 (15) 0.42414 (13) 0.47385 (11) 0.0159 (3)
C10 0.17377 (16) 0.84204 (14) 0.48160 (12) 0.0200 (3)
N2 0.12201 (15) 0.43233 (12) 0.26182 (10) 0.0207 (3)
H01 0.090 (2) 0.500 (2) 0.2110 (18) 0.036 (5)*
H02 0.037 (2) 0.376 (2) 0.2551 (16) 0.030 (5)*
N3 0.17469 (17) 0.95620 (12) 0.48127 (12) 0.0298 (3)
O1 0.09637 (12) 0.69230 (9) 0.27097 (8) 0.0208 (2)

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
N1 0.0174 (6) 0.0137 (5) 0.0162 (5) −0.0004 (4) 0.0016 (4) −0.0012 (4)
C2 0.0134 (6) 0.0151 (6) 0.0214 (7) 0.0001 (4) 0.0028 (5) 0.0014 (5)
C3 0.0150 (6) 0.0129 (6) 0.0223 (6) −0.0009 (4) 0.0037 (5) −0.0012 (5)
C4 0.0154 (6) 0.0171 (6) 0.0199 (6) −0.0005 (5) 0.0047 (5) −0.0024 (5)
C4A 0.0153 (6) 0.0162 (6) 0.0192 (6) 0.0000 (5) 0.0036 (5) 0.0012 (5)
C5 0.0240 (7) 0.0182 (6) 0.0170 (6) 0.0015 (5) 0.0051 (5) 0.0018 (5)
C6 0.0212 (7) 0.0241 (7) 0.0182 (6) 0.0018 (5) 0.0006 (5) 0.0020 (5)
C7 0.0197 (7) 0.0204 (7) 0.0229 (7) 0.0036 (5) 0.0037 (5) 0.0044 (5)
C8 0.0199 (7) 0.0182 (6) 0.0215 (6) 0.0026 (5) 0.0048 (5) 0.0005 (5)
C9 0.0193 (7) 0.0137 (6) 0.0218 (6) −0.0002 (5) 0.0026 (5) −0.0003 (5)
C9A 0.0133 (6) 0.0145 (6) 0.0195 (6) −0.0006 (4) 0.0030 (5) 0.0008 (4)
C10 0.0183 (6) 0.0182 (7) 0.0227 (6) 0.0002 (5) 0.0033 (5) −0.0007 (5)
N2 0.0272 (7) 0.0176 (6) 0.0154 (5) −0.0018 (5) 0.0006 (5) −0.0033 (4)
N3 0.0340 (8) 0.0182 (6) 0.0366 (7) 0.0000 (5) 0.0068 (6) −0.0004 (5)
O1 0.0237 (5) 0.0170 (4) 0.0199 (5) 0.0012 (4) 0.0012 (4) 0.0039 (4)

Geometric parameters (Å, º)

N1—C9A 1.3680 (16) C10—N3 1.1471 (19)
N1—C2 1.4017 (16) C4—H4 0.9500
N1—N2 1.4201 (15) C5—H5A 0.9900
C2—O1 1.2486 (16) C5—H5B 0.9900
C2—C3 1.4260 (18) C6—H6A 0.9900
C3—C4 1.3826 (18) C6—H6B 0.9900
C3—C10 1.4328 (18) C7—H7A 0.9900
C4—C4A 1.3943 (18) C7—H7B 0.9900
C4A—C9A 1.3892 (18) C8—H8A 0.9900
C4A—C5 1.5101 (17) C8—H8B 0.9900
C5—C6 1.5375 (19) C9—H9A 0.9900
C6—C7 1.5308 (19) C9—H9B 0.9900
C7—C8 1.5283 (18) N2—H01 0.90 (2)
C8—C9 1.5432 (18) N2—H02 0.91 (2)
C9—C9A 1.5018 (17)
C9A—N1—C2 124.66 (11) C4A—C5—H5B 109.1
C9A—N1—N2 119.86 (10) C6—C5—H5B 109.1
C2—N1—N2 115.22 (10) H5A—C5—H5B 107.8
O1—C2—N1 119.27 (11) C7—C6—H6A 108.8
O1—C2—C3 126.31 (12) C5—C6—H6A 108.8
N1—C2—C3 114.42 (11) C7—C6—H6B 108.8
C4—C3—C2 121.64 (12) C5—C6—H6B 108.8
C4—C3—C10 121.30 (12) H6A—C6—H6B 107.7
C2—C3—C10 117.01 (12) C8—C7—H7A 108.3
C3—C4—C4A 121.04 (12) C6—C7—H7A 108.3
C9A—C4A—C4 118.72 (12) C8—C7—H7B 108.3
C9A—C4A—C5 120.85 (12) C6—C7—H7B 108.3
C4—C4A—C5 120.26 (12) H7A—C7—H7B 107.4
C4A—C5—C6 112.46 (11) C7—C8—H8A 108.7
C7—C6—C5 113.75 (11) C9—C8—H8A 108.7
C8—C7—C6 115.79 (11) C7—C8—H8B 108.7
C7—C8—C9 114.41 (11) C9—C8—H8B 108.7
C9A—C9—C8 111.42 (11) H8A—C8—H8B 107.6
N1—C9A—C4A 119.48 (12) C9A—C9—H9A 109.3
N1—C9A—C9 119.26 (11) C8—C9—H9A 109.3
C4A—C9A—C9 121.22 (12) C9A—C9—H9B 109.3
N3—C10—C3 178.28 (16) C8—C9—H9B 109.3
C3—C4—H4 119.5 H9A—C9—H9B 108.0
C4A—C4—H4 119.5 N1—N2—H01 102.6 (13)
C4A—C5—H5A 109.1 N1—N2—H02 108.8 (12)
C6—C5—H5A 109.1 H01—N2—H02 107.1 (17)
C9A—N1—C2—O1 177.72 (12) C4A—C5—C6—C7 −80.60 (15)
N2—N1—C2—O1 3.59 (17) C5—C6—C7—C8 61.27 (16)
C9A—N1—C2—C3 −1.60 (18) C6—C7—C8—C9 −61.68 (16)
N2—N1—C2—C3 −175.73 (11) C7—C8—C9—C9A 80.91 (14)
O1—C2—C3—C4 −179.57 (13) C2—N1—C9A—C4A 2.30 (19)
N1—C2—C3—C4 −0.30 (18) N2—N1—C9A—C4A 176.17 (12)
O1—C2—C3—C10 −2.1 (2) C2—N1—C9A—C9 −175.43 (12)
N1—C2—C3—C10 177.22 (11) N2—N1—C9A—C9 −1.55 (18)
C2—C3—C4—C4A 1.5 (2) C4—C4A—C9A—N1 −0.99 (18)
C10—C3—C4—C4A −175.93 (13) C5—C4A—C9A—N1 −176.19 (12)
C3—C4—C4A—C9A −0.82 (19) C4—C4A—C9A—C9 176.68 (12)
C3—C4—C4A—C5 174.41 (12) C5—C4A—C9A—C9 1.48 (19)
C9A—C4A—C5—C6 66.67 (16) C8—C9—C9A—N1 109.73 (13)
C4—C4A—C5—C6 −108.45 (14) C8—C9—C9A—C4A −67.96 (16)

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
N2—H01···O1 0.90 (2) 2.05 (2) 2.6255 (15) 120.4 (16)
N2—H02···O1i 0.91 (2) 2.16 (2) 3.0225 (15) 158.2 (17)
C4—H4···O1ii 0.95 2.45 3.2105 (16) 137
C9—H9A···O1i 0.99 2.63 3.4903 (16) 146

Symmetry codes: (i) −x, y−1/2, −z+1/2; (ii) x, −y+3/2, z+1/2.

References

  1. Agilent (2010). CrysAlis PRO. Agilent Technologies Ltd., Yarnton, England.
  2. Albov, D. V., Mazina, O. S., Rybakov, V. B., Babaev, E. V., Chemyshev, V. V. & Aslanov, L. A. (2004a). Kristallografiya, 49, 208–218 [translated as Crystallogr. Rep. 49, 158–168].
  3. Albov, D. V., Rybakov, V. B., Babaev, E. V. & Aslanov, L. A. (2004b). Acta Cryst. E60, o894–o895.
  4. Elgemeie, G. H. & Abd Elaziz, H. (2015). Curr. Microw. Chem. 2, 90–128.
  5. Elgemeie, G. H., Abou-Zeid, M., Alsaid, S., Hebishy, A. & Essa, H. (2015). Nucleosides Nucleotides Nucleic Acids, 34, 659–673. [DOI] [PubMed]
  6. Elgemeie, G. H., Abu-Zaied, M. & Azzam, R. (2016). Nucleosides Nucleotides Nucleic Acids, 35, 211–222. [DOI] [PubMed]
  7. Elgemeie, G. H. & Hamed, M. (2014). Curr. Microw. Chem. 1, 155–176.
  8. Elgemeie, G. H., Mahmoud, M. A. & Jones, P. G. (2002). Acta Cryst. E58, o1293–o1295.
  9. Elgemeie, G. H., Mohamed, R. A., Hussein, H. A. & Jones, P. G. (2015). Acta Cryst. E71, 1322–1324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  10. Elgemeie, G. H., Salah, A. M., Mohamed, R. A. & Jones, P. G. (2015). Acta Cryst. E71, 1319–1321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  11. Fischer, C. B., Polborn, K., Steininger, H. & Zipse, H. (2004). Z. Naturforsch. Teil B, 59, 1121–1131.
  12. Groom, C. R., Bruno, I. J., Lightfoot, M. P. & Ward, S. C. (2016). Acta Cryst. B72, 171–179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  13. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  14. Siemens (1994). XP. Siemens Analytical X–Ray Instruments, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989016012196/su5315sup1.cif

e-72-01239-sup1.cif (20.5KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989016012196/su5315Isup2.hkl

e-72-01239-Isup2.hkl (100.7KB, hkl)

Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989016012196/su5315Isup3.cml

CCDC reference: 1496294

Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES