Skip to main content
PMC home page
Oncotarget logoLink to Oncotarget
. 2016 Jun 7;7(27):42422–42430. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.9880

Comprehensive analysis of long non-coding RNA expression profiles in hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma

Xianli Gong 1, Wei Wei 1, Lan Chen 1, Zhi Xia 1, Chengbo Yu 2
PMCID: PMC5173145  PMID: 27285756

Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common kinds of malignancies and is closely correlated with hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. Recent evidence has proved that long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are implicated in development and progression of cancer. However, the contributions of lncRNAs to HBV-related HCC remain largely unknown. Here, we comprehensively investigated lncRNA expression profiles in HBV-related HCC by annotating and analyzing microarray datasets. By analyzing 42 HCC tissue samples with different etiology (HBV-related, alcohol-related, and primary HCC) and 15 normal liver tissues, we identified 182 lncRNAs that were specifically differentially expressed in HBV-related HCC, namely HBV-related HCC specific lncRNAs(HH-lncRNAs). Using an online function annotation tool, we found these HH-lncRNAs were associated many oncogenes and immunity related biological processes. 6 candidate HH-lncRNAs were selected and further validated by quantitative real-time PCR analysis in a cohort of HCC tissue samples. Function of a candidate HH-lncRNAs, BAIAP2-AS1, was further predicted by co-expression network and gene set enrichment analysis. These findings provide insights into HH-lncRNAs and offer resource for further search of biomarkers and therapeutic targets of HBV-related HCC.

Keywords: hepatitis B virus, hepatocellular carcinoma, lncRNA, expression profile

INTRODUCTION

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common malignant tumors and currently ranks the third course of cancer-related death [1]. Despite the treatment improvements achieved in surgical strategies and surveillance, the prognosis of HCC is still poor with a 5-year survival rate around 26% [2]. HCC is tightly correlated with hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and almost half of HCC cases are associated with HBV infection. The geographic distribution of chronic HBV infection rates and HCC are highly similar [3]. However, the exact mechanism of HBV and HCC has not yet been clarified, herein, understanding mechanism of HBV in HCC development is crucial for early screening, clinical diagnosis, prevention, and prognosis of HCC patients.

The human genome contains about 20000 protein-coding genes, which account for only less than 2% of genome sequence [4]. However, about 90% of human genome is actively transcribed, yielding an extraordinary amount of RNA transcripts without protein-coding capacity [5]. Long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) is an important kind of non-coding RNA transcripts that range from 200nt to 100kb without protein-coding capacity [6, 7]. Recent years, increasing evidence have reported that lncRNAs participate in various biological processes [8, 9] and pathogenesis [10], especially tumorigenesis [11–13]. For HCC, lncRNA is involved in the HCC pathological processes by multiple mechanisms, including epigenetic silencing, mRNA splicing, and genetic variation [14–16]. For example, a novel lncRNA, HULC is upregulated in HCC compared with normal tissues and the expression level of HULC is correlated HBV infection status [17]. Additionally, HULC could potentially be a biomarker since HULC can be detected in both blood and tumor tissues of HCC patients [18].

The molecular mechanism underlying HBV-related HCC is still elusive and lncRNA may provide new insights into the underlying mechanism. On the other hand, few studies have characterized lncRNA expression profile in HBV-related HCC and the exact role of lncRNA in HBV-related HCC has not been clearly certified. Thus, we comprehensively investigated lncRNA expression profile in HBV-related HCC and tried to identify HBV-related HCC specific lncRNAs (HH-lncRNAs). In this study, we analyzed lncRNA expression profile in 57 tissue samples, including primary HCC, alcohol induced HCC, and HBV-related HCC, and normal liver tissues. A HH-lncRNA, BAIAP2-AS1 was characterized and we further predicted BAIAP2-AS1 function by co-expression network and potential competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) relationship.

RESULTS

Dataset selection and probe annotation

The Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) is a public online database of high-throughput datasets, such as sequencing and microarray datasets. Profiling lncRNAs expression by annotation of microarray probe sets is a feasible and effective method, which has been utilized by many researchers [19, 20]. We searched GEO to identify datasets that included HBV-related HCC samples. The GSE62232 dataset met our criteria and the Affymetrix human genome U133 (HG U133) Plus2.0 microarray platform was used in this study. Probe sets of HG U133 Plus2.0 microarray were annotated by blasting with probe sequences with lncRNA transcripts from RefSeq database (Figure 1. Probe sets annotation pipeline). 8244 lncRNA transcripts were annotated in the HG U133 Plus2.0 microarray.

Figure 1. Computational pipeline for re-annotating the probes of the Affymetrix Human Genome U133 plus2.0 array.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Differential expression of lncRNAs in HBV-related HCC

In the GSE62232 dataset, 4 groups of patient samples were retrieved and analyzed: normal liver tissues (n=10), HBV-related HCC (n=10), alcohol-related HCC (n=22), and primary HCC (n=15). As shown in Figure 2A, primary and alcohol-related HCC were selected as control groups to identify HH-lncRNAs. 182 HH-lncRNA transcripts were achieved in this way (Figure 2B and Supplementary Table S1).

Figure 2.

A. Flow chart of data analyses. B. Heatmap of 182 HH-lncRNAs in the GSE62232 dataset. C. Neighbor genes of the 182 HH-lncRNAs. GO items D. and KEGG pathways E. enriched among the neighbor genes of HH-lncRNAs

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Although many cancer-associated lncRNAs have been characterized, it is hard to predict function and potential molecular mechanism of lncRNAs. Genomic location may provide insights into potential function of lncRNAs since many lncRNAs exert their function in cis. To probe the potential biological function of the 182 lncRNAs we identified, the online annotation tool, GREAT (genomic regions enrichment of annotations tool) was used, which annotates genomic regions according to neighboring genes [21]. Predicted by GREAT, HH-lncRNAs were located around many pro-oncogenes, like HBP1, WNT1, and MMP1 (Figure 2C). As shown, immune system associated GO items (regulation of CD8-positive, alpha-beta T cell differentiation) and KEGG pathways (Primary immunodeficiency) were enriched in the 182 HH-lncRNAs (Figure 2D, 2E), indicating these HH-lncRNAs may play important roles in the pathologic process of HBV-related HCC. Functional annotation results of GREAT were shown in Supplementary Table S2.

Characterization of lncRNA BAIAP2-AS1

We then tried to identify candidate HH-lncRNAs among the 182 differentially expressed lncRNAs. Thus, we validated the 182 HH-lncRNAs in the GSE55092 dataset, in which tissue samples were laser capture-microdissected to avoid contamination of non-cancerous cells. Thus, 6 HH-lncRNAs were filtered out (Table 1) in this way. To validate expression of the 6 HH-lncRNAs, qRT-PCR was performed in a cohort of 20 HCC patients, including 10 primary HCC and 10 HBV-related HCC. As shown in Figure 3, expression of 6 HH-lncRNAs validated by qRT-PCR was consistent with microarray results. No difference was found between primary HCC and paired normal tissues, while they were significantly differentially expressed between HBV-related HCC and paired normal tissues. Yu TT has analyzed lncRNA expression in HBV-related HCC tissues with microarray [22], and found a significant up-regualted lncRNA, ULK4P2. However, ULK4P2 was not found in our results, which may be explained by different annotation methods. QRT-PCR analysis found that ULK4P2 was up-regualted in both primary HCC and HBV-related HCC tissues (Supplementary Figure S1).

Table 1. Characteristics of the 6 candidate HH-lncRNAs.

Refseq Accession logFC chr start end strand Description
XR_950307.1 −1.94 chr11 75205717 75225564 - Homo sapiens uncharacterized LOC105369388 (LOC105369388), transcript variant X4, ncRNA
XR_427858.1 −1.7 chr6 46652945 46678190 + Homo sapiens solute carrier family 25, member 27 (SLC25A27), transcript variant X1, misc_RNA
NR_073450.1 −1.38 chrX 54933134 54994078 - Homo sapiens 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-biphosphatase 1 (PFKFB1), transcript variant 4, non-coding RNA
XR_944502.1 −1.05 chr12 128853440 128984962 + Homo sapiens glycosyltransferase 1 domain containing 1 (GLT1D1), transcript variant 2, non-coding RNA
NR_026857.1 1.02 chr17 81029133 81034719 - Homo sapiens BAIAP2 antisense RNA 1 (head to head) (BAIAP2-AS1), long non-coding RNA
XR_243433.2 1.05 chr16 68263830 68301819 + Homo sapiens solute carrier family 7 (amino acid transporter light chain, y+L system), member 6 (SLC7A6), transcript variant X7, misc_RNA
Open in a new tab

Figure 3. Expression of 6 HH-lncRNAs was validated among patients with primary HCC and HBV-related HCC.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

*P <0.05, **<P<0.01.

Among 6 candidate HH-lncRNAs, BAIAP2-AS1 was selected for further characterization, since it is mostly up-regualted. BAIAP2-AS1 is a heat-to-head antisense lncRNA of BAIAP2. The BAIAP2-AS1 gene is located in the genomic region of chr17q25.3, encoded a 4421nt RNA transcript. Some antisense lncRNAs may affect expression of their neighbor coding genes [23, 24]. However, we found no significant association between BAIAP2-AS1 and BAIAP2 expression, indicating BAIAP2-AS1 possibly function independent of BAIAP2.

It is widely accepted that genes regualted by the same regulator or a set of genes with the same function would be co-expressed and co-expression network has been used to predict function of unknown genes [25]. Genes that are co-expressed with BAIAP2-AS1 in human live cancer are retrieved through the online database of the cancer genome atlas (TCGA) data (methods section). We therefore constructed co-expression network for BAIAP2-AS1 (Figure 4A). Functional annotation analyses shown that metabolism related GO items, and cancer associated KEGG pathways were enriched among the genes co-expressed with BAIAP2-AS1 (Figure 4B, 4C). Pandolfi PP has proposed the competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) hypothesis in 2011 [26] and many lncRNAs has confirmed the ceRNA mechanism of lncRNAs [27]. According to ceRNA hypothesis, RNA transcripts with ceRNA relationship share the same miRNA biding sites and their expression levels are positively correlated. Thus, we hypothesized that BAIAP2-AS1 may function as ceRNA. By online tool, we found several conserved miRNA binding sites in the sequence of BIAPA2-AS1 (Supplementary Table S3). Gene set enrichment analyses (GSEA) showed target mRNAs of miR-491, miR-331, and miR-34A were positively enriched with BAIP2-AS1 (Figure 4D), namely, these mRNAs were positively correlated BAIAP2-AS1 expression. In addition, BAIAP2-AS1 also harbors binding sites of miR-491, miR-331, and miR-34A. We then analyzed the expression correlation in the GSE62232 dataset. As expected, BAIAP2-AS1 is significantly positively correlated with MAPKAP1 (target of miR-491, coefficient=0.227, P=0.030), E2F3 (target of miR-34A, coefficient =0.345, P=0.001), and RAF1 (target of miR-331, coefficient =0.223, P=0.034) (Figure 4E–4G).

Figure 4.

Co-expression network of BAIAP2-AS1 in the TCGA HCC dataset A. KEGG pathways and GO items enriched among genes co-expressed with BAIAP2-AS1 in the TCGA HCC dataset B, C. GSEA results showed that target genes of miR-34A were positively correlated with BAIAP2-AS1 D. Positively correlation between BAIAP2-AS1 and MAPK1, E2F3, and RAF1 in the GSE62232 dataset E, F, G.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

To further investigate the ceRNA hypothesis of BAIAP2-AS1, 2 small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) specifically targeting BAIAP2-AS1 were synthesized and transfection of siRNA 1# significantly knockdown BAIAP2-AS1 expression in HepG2 cells (Figure 5A). Then, we analyzed MAPKAP1, E2F3, and RAF1 expression levels after BAIPA2-AS1 silence by qRT-PCR (Figure 5B), and the results showed that the expression of MAPKAP1 and RAF1 decreased, while E2F3 expression level showed no difference. These data suggested BAIAP2-AS1 may function as a ceRNA.

Figure 5.

BAIAP2-AS1 was significantly silenced by siRNA 1# A. compared with negative control (NC). And after silence of BAIAP2-AS1, the expression levels of MAPKAP1 and RAF1 decreased, while E2F3 showed no significant differences B. *P<0.05, **<P<0.01.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

DISCUSSION

In the current study we comprehensively analyzed lncRNA expression in HBV-related HCC and identified 182 HH-lncRNAs. Compared with previous reports [22], our study has several advantages. First, alcohol-related HCC and primary HCC were treated as control groups to identified lncRNAs that are specifically differentially expressed in HBV-related HCC. Second, functional annotation and prediction was performed for the 182 HH-lncRNAs and an individual HH-lncRNA, BAIAP2-AS1. Third, compared with other reports that compared HCC tissues to adjacent normal tissues, sample size was larger in our analyses, which might provide better statistical efficacy.

LncRNA has been thought as junk RNA and transcription noise, however, recent evidence have proved lncRNAs are involved in various biological and pathological processes [7, 12]. LncRNAs have been found to function at almost every aspect in regulation of gene: epigenetic, transcriptional, post-transcriptional, and translational. Due to the advance of high-throughput sequence and microarray of the transcriptome, thousands of lncRNAs have been discovered and are found differentially expressed. However, little is known about the possible biological functions. For example, in the aspect of HBV-related HCC, Yu and colleagues performed an lncRNA microarray study to analyze lncRNA expression but they did not characterize or predict function of a specific lncRNA [22]. In the current study, we identified 182 HH-lncRNAs and based on their genomic location, we predicted potential function of these lncRNAs with an online tool. As shown, several immune related items were enriched, such as T cell reporter signaling pathway, B cell receptor signaling pathway, and regulation of CD8-positive, alpha-beta T cell activation. These results indicated that the 182 HH-lncRNAs might be involved in these biological processes.

CeRNA hypothesis was proposed in 2011 and more and more evidence has supported this mechanism [26]. For example, the well-known lncRNA, HOTAIR, could function as a sponge of miR-331-3p to promote gastric cancer progression [28]. In this study, we find lncRNA BAIAP2-AS1 harbors several conserved miRNA binding sites and is possibly function as miRNA sponge to promote HBV-related HCC. We found BAIAP2-AS1 shares the same miRNA binding sites with E2F3, RAF1, and MAPK1, and BAIAP2-AS1 expression level was positively correlated with these genes. E2F3 is a member of the E2F transcription factors that are master regulators of many biological processes, like DNA repair, apoptosis, cell cycle, and centrosome duplication [29]. E2F3 is overexpressed in various cancers and drives tumorigenesis [30]. RAF1 is also a pro-oncogene and serves as a part of the mitogen-activated protein kinases/extracellular signal-regulated kinase signal transduction pathway and regulates cell migration, apoptosis, and differentiation. Raf1 phosphorylates and activates Raf-MEK-ERK pathway, which then regulates cell cycle, proliferation, apoptosis, and migration [31]. However, after silence of BAIAP2-AS1, expression level of E2F3 was not down-regualted. According to a recent review [32], the reason may be that miR-34A is an abundant miRNA and silence of BAIAP2-AS1 is not enough to affect miR-34A activity. Also, the endogenous target pool of miR-34a may also account for this. However, further experiments are needed to validate this hypothesis.

To summary, we comprehensively characterize lncRNA expression profile in HBV-related HCC and provide a basis for understanding roles of lncRNA in HBV-related HCC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Microarray dataset information

Gene expression data used in the current study was obtained from the publicly available Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. The data sets (GSE62232 and GSE55092) were performed on the Affymetrix HG-U133 Plus 2.0 platform. The HG-U133 Plus 2.0 microarray is widely used to profile genome-wide gene expression, which proved abundant resource for data mining. The raw CEL files were downloaded and quantile normalized and background adjusted using Robust Multichip Average (RMA, Windows Version) [33, 34]. After normalization, expression value of each probe was obtained. The normalized data were then analyzed with linear models for microarray data (LIMMA) [35] using the Bioconductor package through R 3.0.1. The probe sets with adjusted P value below 0.05 and absolute fold change > 2 was defined as significantly different.

Probe sets annotation

To identify the probe sets mapped to lncRNAs, we developed an lncRNA annotation pipeline. First, lncRNA transcripts were downloaded from the NCBI Refseq database and probe sequences of HG-U133Plus 2.0 microarray were also downloaded from the Affymetrix website. Then, the sequences of probe sets and sequences of lncRNAs were compared with BLAST software. Only sequences of a probe set were perfectly matched with an lncRNA, then the probe set was considered as matched with this lncRNA; otherwise, the BLAST result was abandoned. Thus, an lncRNA re-annotation pipeline was built and the differentially probe sets were filtered and annotated with this pipeline.

Patients and tissue samples

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University. Paired HCC tissues and adjacent normal tissues were obtained from 20 patients who received treatment in The First Affiliated Hospital between 2009 and 2014. All tissue samples were snap-frozen and stored at −80 until total RNA extraction. All tumor and paired normal tissues were confirmed by experienced pathologists. Informed written consents were obtained from all patients included in this study.

Cell culture and transfection

HepG2 cells were purchased from ATCC and maintained in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS. Cells were cultured at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere containing 95% air and 5% CO2.

Small interfering RNA (siRNA) specific for BAIAP2-AS1 (siRNA 1# and siRNA 2#) and negative control was synthesized (GenePharm, Shanghai, China) and transfected using Lipofectamine 2000 in HepG2 cells according manufacture instruction. The sequences of si-BAIAP2-AS1 were: siRNA 1#: GCAGGCATGGTGTGCATTT; siRNA 2#: GCACCTGAGAGGTGATCAT.

RNA extraction and qRT-PCR analysis

RNA of tissue sample was isolated with TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacture's protocol. 1000 ng total RNA was reversely transcribed into a final volume of 20 μl using the PrimerScript RT Master Mix (Takara, cat: RR036A). The quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was performed using the SYBR Select Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, cat: 4472908) on ABI 7500 system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. B-actin was measured as an internal control paired tumor and normal tissues. After the reverse transcription, 0.5 μl of the complementary DNA was used for subsequent qRT-PCR reaction. The PCR primers used were provided in Supplementary Table S4. The −ΔΔCt-method was used to measure expression level of target genes.

Statistical and bioinformatics analyses

GREAT analyses were performed by the website (http://bejerano.stanford.edu/great/public/html/). Gene Ontology (GO) and KEGG pathway analyses were conducted using DAVID website (https://david.ncifcrf.gov/home.jsp). GSEA was performed by the GSEA software and gene sets used in this work were downloaded from the Molecular Signatures Database (http://software.broadinstitute.org/gsea/msigdb/index.jsp, MSigDB v4.0, released Jun 7, 2013). According to BAIAP2-AS1 expression, samples were classified into 2 groups: high expression and low expression. Genes co-expressed with BAIAP2-AS1 in HCC was obtained from the online database (http://lncrnator.ewha.ac.kr), which collected TCGA data. Co-expression network was constructed by Cytoscape software. Paired T test were used to analyze PCR results and P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

SUPPLEMENTARY FIGURE AND TABLES

Footnotes

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The authors have no conflict of interests

GRANT SUPPORT

The work was supported by grant from the National Scientific and Technological Major Project of China (No.2013ZX10004904).

REFERENCES

  • 1.Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61:69–90. doi: 10.3322/caac.20107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Simard EP, Ward EM, Siegel R, Jemal A. Cancers with increasing incidence trends in the United States: 1999 through 2008. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012;62:118–28. doi: 10.3322/caac.20141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Chang MH. Cancer prevention by vaccination against hepatitis B. Recent Results Cancer Res. 2009;181:85–94. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-69297-3_10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Stein LD. Human genome: end of the beginning. Nature. 2004;431:915–6. doi: 10.1038/431915a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Costa FF. Non-coding RNAs: Meet thy masters. Bioessays. 2010;32:599–608. doi: 10.1002/bies.200900112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Nagano T, Fraser P. No-nonsense functions for long noncoding RNAs. Cell. 2011;145:178–81. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.03.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ponting CP, Oliver PL, Reik W. Evolution and functions of long noncoding RNAs. Cell. 2009;136:629–41. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Tian D, Sun S, Lee JT. The long noncoding RNA Jpx is a molecular switch for X chromosome inactivation. Cell. 2010;143:390–403. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.09.049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hung T, Wang Y, Lin MF, Koegel AK, Kotake Y, Grant GD, Horlings HM, Shah N, Umbricht C, Wang P, Wang Y, Kong B, Langerod A, et al. Extensive and coordinated transcription of noncoding RNAs within cell-cycle promoters. Nat Genet. 2011;43:621–9. doi: 10.1038/ng.848. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Szymanski M, Barciszewska MZ, Erdmann VA, Barciszewski J. A new frontier for molecular medicine: noncoding RNAs. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2005;1756:65–75. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2005.07.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Prensner JR, Chinnaiyan AM. The emergence of lncRNAs in cancer biology. Cancer Discov. 2011;1:391–407. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-11-0209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Qiu MT, Hu JW, Yin R, Xu L. Long noncoding RNA: an emerging paradigm of cancer research. Tumour Biol. 2013;34:613–20. doi: 10.1007/s13277-013-0658-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Gupta RA, Shah N, Wang KC, Kim J, Horlings HM, Wong DJ, Tsai MC, Hung T, Argani P, Rinn JL, Wang Y, Brzoska P, Kong B, et al. Long non-coding RNA HOTAIR reprograms chromatin state to promote cancer metastasis. Nature. 2010;464:1071–6. doi: 10.1038/nature08975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Li CH, Chen Y. Targeting long non-coding RNAs in cancers: progress and prospects. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2013;45:1895–910. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2013.05.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Huang JL, Zheng L, Hu YW, Wang Q. Characteristics of long non-coding RNA and its relation to hepatocellular carcinoma. Carcinogenesis. 2014;35:507–14. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgt405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.He Y, Meng XM, Huang C, Wu BM, Zhang L, Lv XW, Li J. Long noncoding RNAs: Novel insights into hepatocelluar carcinoma. Cancer Lett. 2014;344:20–7. doi: 10.1016/j.canle.2013.10.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Panzitt K, Tschernatsch MM, Guelly C, Moustafa T, Stradner M, Strohmaier HM, Buck CR, Denk H, Schroeder R, Trauner M, Zatloukal K. Characterization of HULC a novel gene with striking up-regulation in hepatocellular carcinoma as noncoding RNA. Gastroenterology. 2007;132:330–42. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.08.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lee GL, Dobi A, Srivastava S. Prostate cancer: diagnostic performance of the PCA3 urine test. Nat Rev Urol. 2011;8:123–4. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2011.10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Cao WJ, Wu HL, He BS, Zhang YS, Zhang ZY. Analysis of long non-coding RNA expression profiles in gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19:3658–64. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i23.3658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Su X, Malouf GG, Chen Y, Zhang J, Yao H, Valero V, Weinstein JN, Spano JP, Meric-Bernstam F, Khayat D, Esteva FJ. Comprehensive analysis of long non-coding RNAs in human breast cancer clinical subtypes. Oncotarget. 2014;5:9864–76. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.2454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.McLean CY, Bristor D, Hiller M, Clarke SL, Schaar BT, Lowe CB, Wenger AM, Bejerano G. GREAT improves functional interpretation of cis-regulatory regions. Nat Biotechnol. 2010;28:495–501. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1630. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Yu TT, Xu XM, Hu Y, Deng JJ, Ge W, Han NN, Zhang MX. Long noncoding RNAs in hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21:7208–17. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i23.7208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Arab K, Park YJ, Lindroth AM, Schafer A, Oakes C, Weichenhan D, Lukanova A, Lundin E, Risch A, Meister M, Dienemann H, Dyckhoff G, Herold-Mende C, et al. Long noncoding RNA TARID directs demethylation and activation of the tumor suppressor TCF21 via GADD45A. Mol Cell. 2014;55:604–14. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.06.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Li W, Zheng J, Deng J, You Y, Wu H, Li N, Lu J, Zhou Y. Increased levels of the long intergenic non-protein coding RNA POU3F3 promote DNA methylation in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma cells. Gastroenterology. 2014;146:1714–26. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.03.002. e5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Cao MS, Liu BY, Dai WT, Zhou WX, Li YX, Li YY. Differential network analysis reveals dysfunctional regulatory networks in gastric carcinogenesis. Am J Cancer Res. 2015;5:2605–25. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Salmena L, Poliseno L, Tay Y, Kats L, Pandolfi PP. A ceRNA hypothesis: the Rosetta Stone of a hidden RNA language? Cell. 2011;146:353–8. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.07.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kumar MS, Armenteros-Monterroso E, East P, Chakravorty P, Matthews N, Winslow MM, Downward J. HMGA2 functions as a competing endogenous RNA to promote lung cancer progression. Nature. 2014;505:212–7. doi: 10.1038/nature12785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 28.Liu XH, Sun M, Nie FQ, Ge YB, Zhang EB, Yin DD, Kong R, Xia R, Lu KH, Li JH, De W, Wang KM, Wang ZX. Lnc RNA HOTAIR functions as a competing endogenous RNA to regulate HER2 expression by sponging miR-331-3p in gastric cancer. Mol Cancer. 2014;13:92. doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-13-92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Trikha P, Sharma N, Opavsky R, Reyes A, Pena C, Ostrowski MC, Roussel MF, Leone G. E2f1-3 are critical for myeloid development. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:4783–95. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.182733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Reimer D, Hubalek M, Kiefel H, Riedle S, Skvortsov S, Erdel M, Hofstetter G, Concin N, Fiegl H, Muller-Holzner E, Marth C, Altevogt P, Zeimet AG. Regulation of transcription factor E2F3a and its clinical relevance in ovarian cancer. Oncogene. 2011;30:4038–49. doi: 10.1038/onc.2011.119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Wellbrock C, Karasarides M, Marais R. The RAF proteins take centre stage. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2004;5:875–85. doi: 10.1038/nrm1498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Thomson DW, Dinger ME. Endogenous microRNA sponges evidence and controversy. Nat Rev Genet. 2016;17:272–83. doi: 10.1038/nrg.2016.20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Bonnefont J, Laforge T, Plastre O, Beck B, Sorce S, Dehay C, Krause KH. Primate-specific RFPL1 gene controls cell-cycle progression through cyclin B1/Cdc2 degradation. Cell Death Differ. 2011;18:293–303. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2010.102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Irizarry RA, Hobbs B, Collin F, Beazer-Barclay YD, Antonellis KJ, Scherf U, Speed TP. Exploration normalization and summaries of high density oligonucleotide array probe level data. Biostatistics. 2003;4:249–64. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/4.2.249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Smyth GK. Linear models and empirical bayes methods for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol. 2004;3:Article 3. doi: 10.2202/1544-6115.1027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

oncotarget-07-42422-s001.pdf (1.1MB, pdf)
oncotarget-07-42422-s002.xls (38.5KB, xls)
oncotarget-07-42422-s003.xls (435KB, xls)
oncotarget-07-42422-s004.xls (376KB, xls)
oncotarget-07-42422-s005.xls (18KB, xls)

Articles from Oncotarget are provided here courtesy of Impact Journals, LLC

RESOURCES