Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Traffic. 2016 Oct 27;18(1):18–28. doi: 10.1111/tra.12450

An evolutionary balance: conservation vs. innovation in ciliate membrane trafficking

Sabrice Guerrier 1, Helmut Plattner 2, Elizabeth H Richardson 3, Joel B Dacks 3, Aaron P Turkewitz 4,*
PMCID: PMC5182178  NIHMSID: NIHMS818766  PMID: 27696651

Abstract

As most of eukaryotic diversity lies in single-celled protists, they represent unique opportunities to ask questions about the balance of conservation and innovation in cell biological features. Among free-living protists the ciliates offer ease of culturing, a rich array of experimental approaches, and versatile molecular tools, particularly in Tetrahymena thermophila and Paramecium tetraurelia. These attributes have been exploited by researchers to analyze a wealth of cellular structures in these large and complex cells. This mini-review focuses on three aspects of ciliate membrane dynamics, all linked with endolysosomal trafficking. First is nutrition based on phagocytosis and maturation of food vacuoles. Secondly, we discuss regulated exocytosis from vesicles that have features of both dense core secretory granules but also lysosome-related organelles. The third topic is the targeting, breakdown and resorption of parental nuclei in mating partners. For all three phenomena, it is clear that elements of the canonical membrane-trafficking system have been retained and in some cases repurposed. In addition, there is evidence that recently evolved, lineage-specific proteins provide determinants in these pathways.

Keywords: vesicles, Rab GTPase, SNARE, nucleophagy, autophagy, calcium signaling, Alevolate

Graphical abstract

graphic file with name nihms818766u1.jpg

Introduction

Ciliates have been marveled at since the dawn of light microscopy. Named after the abundant cilia that cover some or all of the cell surface 1, ciliates are a highly diverse and ecologically important group of protists. With few exceptions, the thousands of known ciliate species are unicellular and all are heterotrophic, though some also host algal endosymbionts or chloroplasts obtained from algal prey. They are large and often highly active cells and there is a richly detailed historical literature dedicated to their morphologies and behaviors2,3.

The unique cellular features of ciliates have prompted research that has yielded signal contributions to several areas of cell biology. One powerful ongoing application of these cells is to study structure and function of cilia, including the formation and patterning of ciliary basal bodies48. Similarly, the near-universal nuclear dimorphism (of a germ-line micronucleus and a transcriptionally active polyploid macronucleus) has presented unique research opportunities, leading to prize-winning discoveries917. In the course of these efforts, many tools were developed that turned several ciliates into versatile model organisms18,19.

The membrane-trafficking system of ciliates likewise shows excitingly unusual aspects, as well as clear homology with the standard eukaryotic organelle set. Like all eukaryotes, ciliates have a cytoplasm that is partitioned into membrane-bounded organelles that facilitate both secretion and uptake of macromolecules. Many of these membrane-bounded organelles are familiar eukaryotic features (e.g. endoplasmic reticulum, endosomes and Golgi bodies). Other membrane-trafficking organelles are rather unusual, including the functionally distinct nuclear envelopes for the micro- and macronuclei, the calcium-storing alveoli (an array of adjoining membranous sacs that underlie the plasma membrane, and place the ciliates in the higher taxonomic group, the ‘Alveolata’), and the water-pumping contractile vacuole2023. The best-described membrane-trafficking pathways are those involved in various aspects of the endocytic system, such as food vacuole formation, secretory granule deployment and autophagy. A key issue is to clarify the relationship of these organelles and pathways to those that are so well-described in model cell biological systems such as animals.

The question of relatedness is particularly pertinent because ciliates and animals belong to two different, and evolutionarily separated major groups of eukaryotes, the Alveolata and Opisthokonta respectively, with a last common ancestor roughly 1.5 billion years ago24,25. Thus, a mechanistic understanding of membrane trafficking in ciliates, to complement the body of research primarily in animal and fungal (also Opisthokonta) cells, would allow one to compare different cell biological outcomes achieved over enormous evolutionary intervals. This is true for protists in general since unicellular organisms represent most of the diversity in Eukarya2628. However, ciliates have an advantage in that, for several species, there are already well-developed experimental toolkits facilitating a wide range of approaches for functional studies. These tools are most advanced for Tetrahymena thermophila and Paramecium tetraurelia, but molecular studies are also feasible in Oxytricha trifallax and Stentor coereleus (fig 1)18,19,29. Another significant point is that most other protist model organisms (e.g., the Apicomplexans Toxoplasma and Plasmodium, and Trypanosomes,) were chosen due to their medical relevance as parasites, so ciliates in contrast offer a rare window into the evolution of free living protists.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Ciliated protists (Ciliophora) currently studied as model organisms. (A) Paramecium sp. from the aurelia “complex”, which consists of a group of morphologically indistinguishable sister species with cell length of ~150 μm. P. tetraurelia is the chief experimental organism. Phase contrast image. (B) Stentor coeruleus, perhaps the largest single celled microbial eukaryotic model organism (length up to 2000 μm). Brightfield image. (C) Oxytricha sp. from the fallax complex, of which O. trifallax is the chief experimental organism. Image showing ciliature, following protargol impregnation. (D) Tetrahymena thermophila. Scanning electron micrograph. Scale bars: (B) 500 μm; (C) 25 μm; (D) 10 μm. Credits: (A) Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Paramecium_aurelia&oldid=732190666; (B and C) courtesy William Bourland; (D) courtesy Aswati Subramanian.

Importantly, the well-developed toolkits in Tetrahymena and Paramecium have been put to good use for investigating the molecular machinery underpinning membrane trafficking. From extensive studies in animals and fungi, several major protein superfamilies have been identified as critical to vesicle formation, cargo specificity and delivery to membrane-trafficking organelles. These include the Rab GTPases that serve as protein hubs for regulators and effectors that determine the specificity of vesicle fusion, and the four families of SNARE proteins (Qa, Qb, Qc and R) that come together to encode specificity and also provide force to fuse the incoming vesicle with the target organelle30 (SNARE = soluble NEM-sensitive attachment protein receptors; NEM = N-ethylmaleimide). Comparative genomic surveys have shown these families to be pan-eukaryotic31, and set up a reasonable expectation that these proteins and others implicated in membrane trafficking act in ciliates as they do in so many other eukaryotes.

Below we focus on three variants of endocytic pathways that have been examined in ciliates. Rather than provide comprehensive reviews of this work, we hope to point out opportunities to gain novel insights from studies using these organisms.

Food uptake and the phagocytic pathway

Many ciliates are voracious eaters, with striking adaptations for capturing and ingesting other organisms. The ciliate literature is rich in microscopy-based studies of remarkable predators like Tokophrya infusionum, which first harpoons its prey and then harvests the cytoplasm through a microtubule-ringed straw32, or Tetrahymena vorax, which can dramatically remodel its “mouth” depending on the type of prey that is available33. However, molecular data are available almost exclusively from studies in Paramecium tetraurelia and Tetrahymena thermophila. These organisms both possess an oral apparatus comprising a tubular or conical cleft leading to the base where the food vacuoles are formed. Particulate prey like bacteria are swept to the base of the cleft by a current generated by coordinated ciliary beating, which can produce extraordinarily effective prey capture. However, since there are viable Tetrahymena mutants that lack an oral apparatus and cannot ingest bacteria, feeding by particle uptake is not the only way that ciliates can obtain nutrients34. This parallel nutrient uptake may involve clathrin-mediated endocytosis of small vesicles, which occurs at regularly spaced sites over the plasma membrane and which in T. thermophila requires a ciliate-specific dynamin-family protein35.

Broadly similar overall pathways of food uptake and digestion exist in Paramecium and Tetrahymena, reviewed in 3638, and outlined in Figure 2. At the base of an oral apparatus, formation of large vesicles termed food vacuoles transports the particulate material into the cell. A newly formed vacuole rapidly fuses with much smaller heterogeneous vesicles derived from endocytic or endo-lysosomal trafficking pathways. As a result, the food vacuole contents are acidified and exposed to hydrolytic enzymes, thereby promoting efficient digestion of the internalized material. Beginning immediately after their formation and during the subsequent maturation, which involves both membrane retrieval and lumenal neutralization39, food vacuoles can move in the cytoplasm by some combination of molecular motors (including an unconventional myosin40) and cytoplasmic streaming. At the end of the process, the food vacuoles undergo fusion with the plasma membrane at a specific site called the cytoproct41. This fusion allows egestion of any remaining undigested vacuole contents. All of these steps bear obvious similarity to phagocytosis and phagosome formation in mammalian cells such as macrophages42. Also like phagosome-based digestion in mammalian cells, some microbes have mechanisms to subvert the usual pathway in ciliates and establish long-term residence, following ingestion, in the cytoplasm (e.g., algal endosymbionts in Paramecium bursaria) or re-emerge unscathed4345. The latter phenomenon may have medical consequences, since some bacteria appear to increase in pathogenicity during passage through the ciliate phagocytic pathway46.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

A cartoon of vesicle trafficking involved in phagocytosis. At the oral apparatus, phagosomes are formed in the depth of the cytostome (CS), called the cytopharynx (CPh). Here, recycling vesicles originating from the cytoproct (CPr) and from maturing phagolysosomes (PhLy) coalesce to form a nascent phagosome. Acidosomes are late endosomes (LE) that fuse with the newly-forming phagosomes to deliver vATPases, acidifying the lumen. Phagosomes gain their digestive enzymes via fusion with lysosomes (LY), thus becoming phagolysosomes (PhLy). Phagolysosomes also pinch off recycling vesicles (RV) that fuse with the cytopharynx (CPh). Lysosomal material (e.g., hydrolytic enzymes) can be recycled by vesicle budding from tubular extensions from mature phagolysosomes (left-most PhLy), generating lysosomes/recycling vesicles (LY/RV). Undigested phagolysosome contents are released by exocytosis at the cytoproct (CPr). The scheme is conceived according to the work by Allen and Fok, as cited.

Many detailed features of this pathway were established by Allen, Fok, and their colleagues in exquisite studies using Paramecium multimicronucleatum, in which they combined light and particularly electron microscopy with a variety of probes (reviewed in 36,38)(images accessible at www5.pbrc.hawaii.edu/allen/). For some of the features revealed in these studies, there are now molecular data, primarily from studies in P. tetraurelia and T. thermophila. For example, freeze fracture microscopy of phagosome membranes at different stages argued that the cohort of membrane proteins changed during maturation47. Molecular studies subsequently revealed that specific R-SNAREs in P. tetraurelia are associated with just a subset of the food vacuoles 48 and the same is true for specific Rab GTPases in T. thermophila49.

At the first step in the pathway in P. multimicronucleatum, the membrane supply for a newly forming food vacuole does not appear to come from the plasma membrane but instead is provided by recruitment of cytoplasmic discoidal vesicles (Figure 2). These vesicles originate, in part, at the site where an old food vacuole undergoes fusion at the cytoproct, and are subsequently transported across the cell to the oral apparatus 50. Thus a transcytotic pathway appears to recycle the phagosome membrane. The discoidal vesicles in P. tetraurelia are labeled by the Qa-SNAREs PtSyx1, which is also found at multiple other sites, and PtSyx4 which may be preferentially localized to these vesicles48. TtRabD3 labels what appear to be equivalent vesicles in T. thermophila49.

Other studies in P. micronucleatum examined the identities of the vesicles that fuse with food vacuoles36. These appear to comprise multiple classes of endosomes that deliver proton ATPases (vATPases) as well as digestive enzymes. vATPases are hetero-oligomers in which the transmembrane Vo complex contains six subunits. The gene encoding one subunit has undergone a remarkable expansion to 17 paralogs in P. tetraurelia, and the vATPase delivered by acidosomes specifically contain 1 of these 17, a striking example of paralog-specific localization in membrane trafficking factors51. The vesicles delivering vATPase may be recruited in a Rab7-dependent fashion, judging by results obtained in a sibling species, P. octaurelia, in which two Rab7 paralogs are expressed52. One of these localizes to the phagosome membrane, while the second localizes near the oral apparatus and appears to serve a different function.

In P. tetraurelia, another size class of vesicles that fuse with newly formed food vacuoles is marked by specific R-SNAREs (e.g., PtSyb6-1, 8-1 and 9-2)53. Yet a third cohort may correspond to vesicles documented in EM tracer studies using P. multinucleatum, in which some of the vesicles that fuse with food vacuoles appear to be early endosomes54. This idea is consistent with the localization of PtSyb11-1 in P. tetraurelia, which is found on early endosomes and occasionally on single food vacuoles53.

Although still far from comprehensive, these results point to a remarkably complex set of interactions between different classes of vesicles, which occur in a short time period during and immediately after food vacuole formation, and illustrated in fig 2. The Rabs and SNAREs, as in other organisms, must provide some of the specificity. Actin and actin assembly co-factors have been shown in many studies to be required for food vacuole formation, and also for subsequent fusion with vesicles delivering vATPases51,5557. As in other systems, actin is likely to be providing force to move membranes. But actin may also potentially provide specificity determinants, particularly since distinct actin isoforms are present at different stages of food vacuole maturation in P. tetraurelia55. A significant open question is the extent to which ciliates utilize lipid-based specificity determinants such as phosphoinositides (PIs) in this pathway58. One hint is that wortmannin, which inhibits the formation of PI 3-phosphate, affects secretion of hydrolytic enzymes in T. thermophila, and the effect may be at the level of phagosome maturation59. This phenomenon is ripe for analysis, since Tetrahymena appear to synthesize most but not all of the phosphorylated PI derivatives made in mammalian cells, and the PI interconverting enzymes have been identified6063. Thus, ciliates appear to offer promising systems to illuminate evolutionary aspects of lipid-based protein targeting, particularly with regard to the phagosomal pathway.

The studies outlined above have relied almost exclusively on candidate gene (or gene family) approaches to identify factors involved in phagolysosomal pathways. One exception is the isolation of phagocytosis mutants following nitrosoguanidine mutagenesis34. Such forward-genetic approaches in ciliates can now be followed up with whole genome sequencing, to identify precise genetic lesions15,64,65. A second non-biased approach that has been exploited is proteomic, taking advantage of the ability to use density gradient centrifugation to isolate highly purified T. thermophila phagosomes from cells fed small polystyrene beads66. Mass spectrometry of this preparation identified ~30 proteins whose homologs in other organisms have been linked with phagocytosis. The precise roles of many such proteins are poorly understood, and Tetrahymena may be an advantageous system for their future mechanistic analysis. The Tetrahymena phagosome proteome defined in this study also included another ~40 proteins, which are either novel or not previously associated with phagocytosis, and more work will be required to determine what fraction of these are bona fide phagosome constituents. To date, a small set of the novel proteins have been validated as phagosome-associated based on GFP-tagging. One protein, a vacuolar protein sorting 13 (VPS13) homolog, was further shown to be required for efficient phagosome formation and content digestion 67.

How is phagosome formation and maturation in ciliates related, mechanistically and evolutionarily, to the process in animal cells? Both rely on dynamic actin, but there is not yet sufficient information in ciliates to draw detailed comparisons. Unfortunately, few of the implicated Rabs or SNAREs as yet provide much information about evolutionary or mechanistic relatedness, since many Rabs and SNAREs in ciliates are products of lineage-restricted expansions within those gene families. Moreover, robust relationships may be difficult to recognize or establish due to evolutionary distance. Where clearly homologous proteins are involved in mammals and ciliates, e.g., Rab5 in T. thermophila66, Rab7 in P. octaurelia52, or phagosome-associated Rab11 in the distantly-related ciliate Euplotes octocarinatus68, more detailed studies will be needed to determine whether homology extends to upstream and downstream factors. In particular, the functional analysis of factors identified via proteomics, and identification of protein binding partners, could illuminate these questions. Fortunately, many of these approaches are facilitated by the high culture densities to which some ciliates can be rapidly grown.

A pathway of regulated exocytosis

In all cells, the release of proteins and other molecules can modify the environment and shape interactions with other cells. The roles of ciliates in complex natural and man-made ecosystems are increasingly appreciated6971, but precisely how secretion contributes to ciliate physiology and interactions is still largely unexplored. For example, growing Tetrahymena copiously secrete a wide array of hydrolytic enzymes, probably involving secretory lysosomes, but whether these enzymes have physiologically-important activities after being dispersed in the extracellular non-acidic environment is unknown72. Moreover, in addition to release via secretory lysosomes, Tetrahymena releases some newly synthesized proteins by rapid constitutive secretion32,73,74, and stores yet another set of proteins to be released upon stimulation75. There is also evidence for other modes of secretion, including exosome-mediated release73. The egestion of digested food vacuole contents also constitutes a mode of secretion.

Of all these, the ability to secrete upon demand (e.g., in response to some extracellular event) has been best studied. The phenomenon is present in many ciliates, and involves the exocytic fusion of vesicles that are docked at the PM76. For example, many predatory ciliates use such secretion as a hunting strategy, releasing compounds that immobilize prey, which are often other ciliates77. Prey ciliates in turn use compensatory secretion to blunt the attack, sometimes successfully78,79. The mechanistic bases for immobilization and defense, and in most cases the molecules themselves, are only beginning to be explored79,80. In contrast, the formation of such secretory vesicles is now understood in some detail, primarily in T. thermophila, where they are called mucocysts, and in P. tetraurelia, where they are called trichocysts. All evidence indicates that mucocysts and trichocysts in these two species share biosynthetic mechanisms, and should be considered homologous organelles, i.e. evolved from a common origin.

Mucocysts and trichocysts are elongated vesicles that are surrounded by a single lipid bilayer and filled with a dense crystalline core of proteins, and thus resemble dense core secretory granules in animal cells75. Current evidence, particularly immunoelectron microscopy in Paramecium, indicates that major core proteins are delivered to the ciliate granules via the classical eukaryotic secretory pathway81,82. Consistent with this, Paramecium induced to synthesize a cohort of granules (as a consequence of releasing their store of docked granules) upregulate a large set of genes that encode widely conserved trafficking machinery in the endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi83.

One basic question is how the granule proteins in ciliates are routed from the general secretory pathway to accumulate in specific vesicles. In animal cells, targeting of soluble proteins to granules relies on their tendency to form aggregates within the secretory pathway84. Such aggregation is also a marked characteristic of the most abundant ciliate granule proteins, although there is no discernible evolutionary relatedness between the ciliate proteins and those in metazoans85. A second aspect of protein targeting to animal granules is selective cargo retention during granule maturation, a process that involves the removal of a subset of immature granule contents by vesicle budding, at the same time that the granule contents are being remodeled by proteolytic processing. Remarkably, similar proteolytic remodeling occurs in the ciliate granules, and is also required for efficient retention8688. However, the known proteolytic maturases, discovered via transcriptome profiling in T. thermophila, are not related to their functional analogs in metazoan granules89,90. Thus similar mechanistic programs appear to be accomplished by unrelated molecules in animals and ciliates. A similar situation may pertain for some mechanisms facilitating granule exocytosis, which has been studied in P. tetraurelia. There, trichocyst discharge depends on genes in conserved families, e.g., SNAREs 91 but also on a set of genes that are both quite heterogeneous in architecture and apparently ciliate-restricted 92,93.

However, some soluble proteins in Tetrahymena mucocysts do not aggregate85. Instead, their delivery depends upon a receptor encoded by a ciliate-specific paralog within the pan-eukaryotic VPS10/sortilin family 94, called Sor4p, with which they show strong physical interactions consistent with receptor-ligand binding95. The SOR4 results thus show the unanticipated requirement for a sorting receptor in mucocyst biogenesis.

Sor4p localizes to endosomal compartments. In the budding yeast S. cerevisiae, in human cells, and in the Apicomplexan parasite Toxoplasma gondii, VPS10-family receptors are involved in directing proteins to lysosome-related organelles (LROs)96,97. Taken together, the results suggest that mucocyst formation likely involves trafficking from one or more endo-lysosomal compartments. This idea is supported by recent experiments, in which disruption of other Tetrahymena genes associated with endolysosomal trafficking, also resulted in defective mucocyst formation (Kaur and Turkewitz, unpublished).

LROs constitute a strikingly heterogeneous collection of organelles in animals, whose formation often involves trafficking from both the trans-Golgi and from endosomes98. The current data for Paramecium and Tetrahymena raise the possibility that two major classes of luminal trichocyst/mucocyst proteins arrive via two distinct routes, e.g., the aggregated proteins from the trans-Golgi, and the receptor-bound proteins via endosomal intermediates. A divergent R-SNARE, PtSyb5, is associated with trichocyst biosynthetic intermediates in P. tetraurelia, and could provide a valuable molecular marker to explore the two-pathway model 53. Interestingly, electron microscopic images of a third, more distantly related ciliate, Pseudomicrothorax dubius, show beautifully that two populations of vesicles with different luminal contents contribute to trichocyst formation in that species99. Taken together, the data suggest that ciliate granules are a sub-class of LROs whose biogenesis depends on LRO-associated machinery. At the same time, biogenesis also depends on mechanisms more closely associated with metazoan secretory granules. Excitingly, many mutants have been characterized with defects in mucocyst or trichocyst secretion, affecting many different steps during biogenesis86,100102. The ability to now identify the molecular lesions in these mutants by whole-genome sequencing offers a powerful approach to revealing both conserved and novel proteins deployed by ciliates in this pathway64.

Programmed Nuclear Death (PND)

Ciliates possess two distinct nuclei: a germline, diploid Mic and a polyploid Mac103,104. In conjugating T. thermophila cells, the Mic undergoes both meiotic and mitotic division yielding two haploid Mic products. One of these products is stationary; the other is mobile and exchanges with the equivalent product from the mating partner. The mobile and stationary products then fuse to create a new diploid Mic, which undergoes several rounds of mitosis to produce both new Mics and Macs105,106. Concomitant with new Mac development, the parental Mac is destroyed by nucleophagy. PND is the name given to the process by which ciliates selectively degrade the parental Macs following conjugation (Figure 3). The mechanisms involved have been best studied in T. thermophila 107,108. PND involves the fragmentation of parental macronuclear DNA and nuclear condensation, in a process that shares similarities with animal cell apoptosis, and the resorption of the macronucleus is a process that can be broadly described as autophagic 109,110. The apoptotic features of ciliate PND have recently been reviewed108, and we here focus on autophagic aspects of this pathway.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

A cartoon summarizing the types and fates of nuclei present in conjugating T. thermophila. At the stage shown, each cell within the pair has 5 nuclei. The parental macronucleus in each cell (dashed line) is uniquely destined for nucleophagic degradation, or PND, involving mechanisms described in the next. In the same cytoplasm, the new macronuclei will develop from the nuclei positioned near the conjugation junction (called MAC anlagen, light blue), while two other nuclei in the cell posterior (pink) are destined to become micronuclei. Following pair separation and a round of cell division, each daughter will have one micronucleus and one macronucleus.

Autophagy is a process by which eukaryotic cells engulf and then recycle cellular material primarily during periods of starvation111,112.. The engulfing membranes, which are derived from many sources within the cell, take the form of a double bilayer. The initial phagophore membrane is expanded through membrane fusion with other organelles, such as endosomes, allowing it to engulf additional cytoplasmic material. Subsequent fusion with the lysosome facilitates the breakdown of contents for recycling.

Many variants of autophagy exist in mammalian and other cells. For example, autophagic machinery can be repurposed for selective degradation of protein aggregates, specific organelles, or bacteria 113. Autophagic mechanisms also contribute to organellar protein targeting in yeast and to phagocytosis114,115. Striking variation can exist within autophagic phenomena that have the same goal. Nucleophagy refers to the targeting of nuclear material for degradation by autophagosomes. Studies of nucleophagy in many organisms, including yeast, Aspergillus species, and humans, have revealed a diversity of mechanisms and morphologies 116. Nucleophagy in Tetrahymena is still very incompletely understood, but appears to represent yet another variation.

Notwithstanding their diversity, autophagy-related pathways rely on a common set of genes. A set of 19 are referred to as core autophagy genes111,117. Key genes include ATG1/ULK genes, which are involved in transducing upstream signals (e.g., starvation, mTOR inactivation), VPS34 complex genes involved in autophagosome nucleation, and a complex of genes (ATG12–ATG5–ATG16L1) that regulate, via lipidation, the ATG8 family proteins involved in autophagosome expansion. Combinations of the core autophagy genes along with additional factors function in non-canonical and autophagy-like pathways 114,115,118,119.

Ciliates almost certainly rely on multiple autophagy-related pathways, but the only one which has been investigated in molecular detail is nucleophagy in T. thermophila. To understand the relationship between these steps and known autophagic pathways in other organisms, one can first ask whether autophagy-related genes are present in the T. thermophila genome, and in particular whether they are expressed during the appropriate interval in conjugation. In fact, many of the core autophagy genes are present and expressed during conjugation, with some notable absences119,120 Conjugating Tetrahymena also express homologs of several genes associated with non-canonical autophagy pathways. These genes include ATG20 and ATG24, discussed further below, and a homolog (but not necessarily ortholog) of Rubicon. In mammalian cells, Rubicon is a key determinant of LC3/ATG8-associated phagocytosis121. These observations indicate that nucleophagy in Tetrahymena relies on autophagic mechanisms, many of which are present in other organisms, but which may be deployed in novel combinations in ciliates.

A small subset of the autophagy-related genes in Tetrahymena have been analyzed in functional studies. In mammals, ATG8/LC3 plays a role in expansion and cargo targeting of autophagosomes113. Tetrahymena expresses two ATG8 paralogs. TtAtg8 initially localizes to vesicle-like structures during the early phases of conjugation, but shifts to forming a peripheral ring around the parental Mac just prior to the initiation of PND120. Disruption of either of the two ATG8 paralogs disrupted Mac degradation, and in particular blocked the fusion of lysosomes with the targeted parental Mac, but did not block DNA fragmentation.

In yeast and humans, autophagosome formation is regulated by the activation of class III PI3K, VPS34117. Current evidence suggests the PI3K family may play a similar role in Tetrahymena. First, suppression of PI3K by small molecule inhibitors led to accumulation of nuclei during conjugation, suggesting defects in nucleophagy122. More recently, the Tetrahymena VPS34 homolog was studied by gene disruption. VPS34 deletion strains showed defects in Mac degradation, including lysosome fusion with the parental Mac123. Unlike the ATG8 deletion strains, the loss of VPS34 led to decreased DNA fragmentation. The idea that DNA fragmentation is regulated independently of autophagy-related resorption is also consistent with other data. In particular, the loss of Mic chromosome 3 resulted in impaired resorption without affecting DNA fragmentation 107, while disruption of TMN1, a mitochondrial nuclease that translocates to the parental Mac, impaired DNA fragmentation but had no effect on lysosomal fusion124.

Autophagosomes are targeted to parental Macs, sparing the new Macs and Mics that are present in the same cytoplasm. The TtVPS34 knockout phenotype described above suggests that phosphoinositide 3-phosphate (PI3P) may be one determinant for this targeting. Interestingly, a pathway in budding yeast in which autophagosomes transfer specific cytoplasmic cargo to the vacuole, requires two proteins, Atg20 and Atg24, which interact directly with PI3P 125. Moreover, the deletion of these genes also caused defects in targeted autophagic digestion of mitochondria (mitophagy) and perixosomes (pexophagy)126,127. Atg20 and Atg24 bind to PI3P via PX-BAR (phox-homology-bin-amphiphysin-RVS) domains 125. Importantly, the defects seen in the gene knockouts were likely to be due to the targeting of Atg20 and Atg24 by PI3P, since the defects could be phenocopied by mutations within the PX-BAR domains of either protein. The PX-BAR domains are therefore likely to play a critical and conserved role in ATG20 and ATG24 by facilitating phosphoinositide binding. Intriguingly, Tetrahymena has homologs of ATG20 and ATG24, and the proteins are highly expressed during conjugation. Moreover, TtAtg24 specifically localizes to degrading Macs (Guerrier, unpublished).

The mechanism by which Atg20 and Atg24 promote selective targeting is not clear, but these proteins could potentially promote the expansion of autophagosomes 113. ATG20 and ATG24 are members of the sorting nexin family. Human ATG24, also known as SNX4, regulates endosomal trafficking and membrane tubulation 128. While the role of SNX4 in any form of selective autophagy has not been reported in mammals, recent work showed that the related SNX18 contributes to autophagosome expansion by tubulating endosomes to serve as a source of autophagosomal membranes 129. In Tetrahymena, the endoplasmic reticulum, which represents the most well characterized source of autophagosomal membranes, is cleared from the zone surrounding the parental Mac prior to its degradation 109,130. It would therefore be interesting to determine whether endosomes contribute to autophagosome expansion in Tetrahymena, and whether this depends on a SNX-BAR protein. A small family of SNX-BAR domain proteins in T. thermophila are highly diverged in sequence from those in animals, and therefore not efficiently detected by BLAST-based searches 94. However, they are confidently identified using structure-prediction algorithms, e.g., hhpred (Guerrier, unpublished), similar to results for other homologous but sequence-diverged genes, e.g., 131.

PI3P is not the only molecular candidate to potentially mark the parental Mac for degradation. The parental Mac envelope appears to become both lectin-reactive and annexin V-positive just before autophagosomes localize to it 130. These results suggest that sugar-modified proteins and/or phosphatidylserine are exposed on the surface of the parental Mac, and could serve as signals for targeting of cytoplasmic proteins. In fact, carbohydrate binding provides an important determinant in some autophagic targeting pathways132,133. However, Tetrahymena proteins that recognize these potential signals have yet to be identified. Another class of potentially important cues are molecules released from the parental Mac. In particular, during the period when the rough ER is cleared from the zone of the parental Mac, the Mac envelope loses visible nuclear pore complexes 109. The deterioration of these complexes might lead to increased permeability of the nuclear envelope, as has been shown In studies of nematodes and mammalian cells134. The mechanism of nuclear pore degradation, and the idea that leakage of nucleoplasm functions as a targeting signal for autophagosomes remains to be explored, but no leakage of material from the parental Mac has been visualized to date in Tetrahymena. Interestingly, chromatin extrusion from the Mac has been visualized in the ciliate Colpoda cucullus135. This takes place when cells are undergoing encystment, as part of a process of degradation/resorption that results in Mac reduction. The relationship between such processes and PND remains to be explored.

Looking ahead

Although the molecular analysis of membrane trafficking in ciliates is still at an early stage, the picture emerging is that elements of the canonical membrane-trafficking system have been retained and in some cases repurposed, while additional lineage-specific versions of membrane-trafficking proteins have arisen more recently that help support the pathways. This is true both for pathways that appear, judging by morphology and function, to be clearly homologous to those in animals (e.g., phagocytosis), and for pathways that are more obviously ciliate-specific (e.g., targeting of the Mac in a developmental program).

The challenge moving forward will be to extend the identification of key proteins to a broader range of ciliate structures and pathways, while at the same time working to understand the mechanisms by which they act. For example, alveoli are an array of adjoining membranous sacs that underlie the plasma membrane136. In Paramecium, alveoli can store millimolar calcium, which in response to upstream signals is mobilized to the cytoplasm where it triggers downstream events22,23. Alveoli bear comparison with specialized calcium stores in animals, such as the sarcoplasmic reticulum in muscle, and the membrane proteins involved in calcium transport are indeed related137. But whether alveoli are related to the endoplasmic reticulum, or share more general structural or functional features, has not yet been thoroughly investigated. Similarly, there are remarkably few molecular data to aid in understanding the membrane trafficking aspects of the contractile vacuole or its evolutionary origins, though some compartment-specific SNAREs and Rabs have been identified49,138. The contractile vacuole is a highly dynamic organelle that shows markedly different organization even between Tetrahymena and Paramecium, whose water-pumping activity is essential for ciliates and other fresh water protists lacking cell walls. Importantly, the rich history of ultrastructural and physiological studies can provide, as for some pathways discussed in this paper, a critical framework for interpreting molecular studies20. In addition, the ability to harness forward genetic approaches in several ciliate species now facilitates unbiased approaches to gene discovery, which can complement candidate gene approaches based on findings in animal, fungal or other lineages.

Ciliates may be particularly well suited for addressing some broad issues in evolutionary cell biology. During the evolution of the complex endomembrane network in eukaryotes, new compartments may have arisen when paralogous gene duplication, with subsequent mutations that ensure co-evolution between interacting components, generated new specificity determinants31. Testing this idea requires understanding the roles of paralogous genes within key gene families, and ciliates may be ideal for this effort. Ciliates are large complex cells with gene-rich genomes; for example, estimated gene number is higher in T. thermophila than in humans139. Importantly, the catalogs of Tetrahymena or Paramecium genes include many paralogous expansions within gene families involved in membrane trafficking140,141. The presence of multiple paralogs is potentially challenging for functional studies, since paralogs may have similar roles. In practice, many individual Tetrahymena paralogs appear to have unique functions, based on analysis of single gene knockouts in numerous studies. P. tetraurelia has larger numbers of closely-related paralogs, due to several notably recent whole genome duplications141. As a result, the two ciliates offer opportunities to study the role of paralog diversification in shaping new pathways over different time intervals. One particularly interesting class of paralogous expansions in Paramecium are gene families involved in calcium sequestration and mobilization, phenomena that are central to signaling pathways and to regulation of membrane dynamics142. Many of the proteins show exquisite compartment-specific localization, suggesting that ciliates may offer exceptional opportunities to investigate the integration of signaling and membrane-trafficking machineries, from both mechanistic and evolutionary perspectives.

Synopsis.

Several species of ciliates represent useful experiment organisms for cell biology research, and particularly for analyzing the outcomes of evolutionary trajectories that are distant from those of fungi or animals. This review focuses on three phenomena in ciliates that are all related to conserved pathways of endolysosomal trafficking, but with unique ciliate features: phagosome formation and maturation, regulated exocytosis of secretory granules, and programmed degradation of specific nuclei during conjugation.

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge the generous contribution of images by William Bourland (Boise State Univ.), who additionally provided helpful ideas for the text, and Aswati Subramanian (Miami University), and help with figures 2 and 3 from Lev Tsypin. EHR is supported by a 75th Anniversary Graduate Studentship from the Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, U. Alberta and by an Alberta Innovates Technology Futures Graduate Studentship. Work in the Guerrier lab is supported by Mississippi INBRE-NIH IDEA P20GM103476. H.P. gratefully acknowledges the contribution by previous coworkers, as cited in the text, and the German Research Council (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft) for supporting the work cited herein. Work in the Dacks lab is supported by discovery grant RES0021028 from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. JBD is the Canada Research Chair (Tier II) in Evolutionary Cell Biology. Work in the Turkewitz lab is supported by NIH GM105783, NSF MCB 1613922, and the Chicago Biomedical Consortium.

References

  • 1.Gao F, Warren A, Zhang Q, et al. The All-Data-Based Evolutionary Hypothesis of Ciliated Protists with a Revised Classification of the Phylum Ciliophora (Eukaryota, Alveolata) Sci Rep. 2016;6:24874. doi: 10.1038/srep24874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hausmann K. Ciliates: Cells as Organisms. Stuttgart: Gustav FischerHausmann, K; 1996. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Fokin SI. A brief history of ciliate studies (late XVII - the first third of the XX century) Protistology. 2004;3(4):283–296. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bayless BA, Galati DF, Pearson CG. Tetrahymena basal bodies. Cilia. 2015;5:1. doi: 10.1186/s13630-016-0022-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wloga D, Gaertig J. Post-translational modifications of microtubules. Journal of cell science. 2010;123(Pt 20):3447–3455. doi: 10.1242/jcs.063727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Beisson J. Preformed cell structure and cell heredity. Prion. 2008;2(1):1–8. doi: 10.4161/pri.2.1.5063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kilburn CL, Pearson CG, Romijn EP, et al. New Tetrahymena basal body protein components identify basal body domain structure. J Cell Biol. 2007;178(6):905–912. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200703109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Slabodnick MM, Ruby JG, Dunn JG, Feldman JL, DeRisi JL, Marshall WF. The kinase regulator mob1 acts as a patterning protein for stentor morphogenesis. PLoS biology. 2014;12(5):e1001861. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Mizzen CA, Allis CD. Linking histone acetylation to transcriptional regulation. Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS. 1998;54(1):6–20. doi: 10.1007/s000180050121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Blackburn EH. Telomerases. Annual review of biochemistry. 1992;61:113–129. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.61.070192.000553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Greider CW, Blackburn EH. Identification of a specific telomere terminal transferase activity in Tetrahymena extracts. Cell. 1985;43(2 Pt 1):405–413. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90170-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Cech TR. Nobel lecture. Self-splicing and enzymatic activity of an intervening sequence RNA from Tetrahymena. Biosci Rep. 1990;10:239–261. doi: 10.1007/BF01117241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Yao MC, Fuller P, Xi X. Programmed DNA deletion as an RNA-guided system of genome defense. Science. 2003;300(5625):1581–1584. doi: 10.1126/science.1084737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Mochizuki K, Fine NA, Fujisawa T, Gorovsky MA. Analysis of a piwi-related gene implicates small RNAs in genome rearrangement in tetrahymena. Cell. 2002;110(6):689–699. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00909-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Singh DP, Saudemont B, Guglielmi G, et al. Genome-defence small RNAs exapted for epigenetic mating-type inheritance. Nature. 2014;509(7501):447–452. doi: 10.1038/nature13318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Baudry C, Malinsky S, Restituito M, et al. PiggyMac, a domesticated piggyBac transposase involved in programmed genome rearrangements in the ciliate Paramecium tetraurelia. Genes Dev. 2009;23(21):2478–2483. doi: 10.1101/gad.547309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Yerlici VT, Landweber LF. Programmed Genome Rearrangements in the Ciliate Oxytricha. Microbiol Spectr. 2014;2(6) doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.MDNA3-0025-2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ruehle MD, Orias E, Pearson CG. Tetrahymena as a Unicellular Model Eukaryote: Genetic and Genomic Tools. Genetics. 2016;203(2):649–665. doi: 10.1534/genetics.114.169748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Beisson J, Betermier M, Bre MH, et al. Paramecium tetraurelia: the renaissance of an early unicellular model. Cold Spring Harb Protoc. 2010;2010(1) doi: 10.1101/pdb.emo140. pdb emo140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Allen RD. The contractile vacuole and its membrane dynamics. Bioessays. 2000;22(11):1035–1042. doi: 10.1002/1521-1878(200011)22:11<1035::AID-BIES10>3.0.CO;2-A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Plattner H. The contractile vacuole complex of protists--new cues to function and biogenesis. Crit Rev Microbiol. 2015;41(2):218–227. doi: 10.3109/1040841X.2013.821650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Stelly N, Mauger JP, Claret M, Adoutte A. Cortical alveoli of Paramecium: a vast submembranous calcium storage compartment. J Cell Biol. 1991;113:103–112. doi: 10.1083/jcb.113.1.103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hardt M, Plattner H. Sub-second quenched-flow/X-ray microanalysis shows rapid Ca2+ mobilization from cortical stores paralleled by Ca2+ influx during synchronous exocytosis in Paramecium cells. European journal of cell biology. 2000;79(9):642–652. doi: 10.1078/0171-9335-00087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Eme L, Sharpe SC, Brown MW, Roger AJ. On the age of eukaryotes: evaluating evidence from fossils and molecular clocks. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2014;6(8) doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a016139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Adl SM, Simpson AG, Lane CE, et al. The revised classification of eukaryotes. The Journal of eukaryotic microbiology. 2012;59(5):429–493. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2012.00644.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Lynch M, Field MC, Goodson HV, et al. Evolutionary cell biology: two origins, one objective. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2014;111(48):16990–16994. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1415861111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Klinger CM, Ramirez-Macias I, Herman EK, Turkewitz AP, Field MC, Dacks JB. Resolving the homology-function relationship through comparative genomics of membrane-trafficking machinery and parasite cell biology. Molecular and biochemical parasitology. 2016 doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2016.07.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Pawlowski J, Audic S, Adl S, et al. CBOL protist working group: barcoding eukaryotic richness beyond the animal, plant, and fungal kingdoms. PLoS biology. 2012;10(11):e1001419. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Slabodnick MM, Marshall WF. Stentor coeruleus. Current biology : CB. 2014;24(17):R783–784. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.06.044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Bonifacino JS, Glick BS. The mechanisms of vesicle budding and fusion. Cell. 2004;116(2):153–166. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(03)01079-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Schlacht A, Herman EK, Klute MJ, Field MC, Dacks JB. Missing pieces of an ancient puzzle: evolution of the eukaryotic membrane-trafficking system. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2014;6(10):a016048. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a016048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Rudzinska MA. The fine structure and function of the tentacle in Tokophrya infusionum. The Journal of cell biology. 1965;25(3):459–477. doi: 10.1083/jcb.25.3.459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Gronlien HK, Berg T, Lovlie AM. In the polymorphic ciliate Tetrahymena vorax, the non-selective phagocytosis seen in microstomes changes to a highly selective process in macrostomes. The Journal of experimental biology. 2002;205(Pt 14):2089–2097. doi: 10.1242/jeb.205.14.2089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Rasmussen L, Orias E. Tetrahymena: growth without phagocytosis. Science. 1975;190(4213):464–465. doi: 10.1126/science.1166313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Elde NC, Morgan G, Winey M, Sperling L, Turkewitz AP. Elucidation of Clathrin-Mediated Endocytosis in Tetrahymena Reveals an Evolutionarily Convergent Recruitment of Dynamin. PLoS Genet. 2005;1(5):e52. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0010052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Allen RD, Fok AK. Membrane trafficking and processing in Paramecium. Int Rev Cytol. 2000;198:277–318. doi: 10.1016/s0074-7696(00)98007-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Fok AK, Allen RD. The phagosome-lysosome membrane system and its regulation in Paramecium. International review of cytology. 1990;123:61–94. doi: 10.1016/s0074-7696(08)60671-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Nilsson JR. Phagotrophy in Tetrahymena. In: Levandowsky M, Hutner SH, editors. Biochemistry and Physiology of Protozoa. Vol. 2. New York: Academic Press; 1979. pp. 339–379. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Allen RD, Bala NP, Ali RF, et al. Rapid bulk replacement of acceptor membrane by donor membrane during phagosome to phagoacidosome transformation in Paramecium. Journal of cell science. 1995;108(Pt 3):1263–1274. doi: 10.1242/jcs.108.3.1263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Hosein RE, Williams SA, Gavin RH. Directed motility of phagosomes in Tetrahymena thermophila requires actin and Myo1p, a novel unconventional myosin. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 2005;61:49–60. doi: 10.1002/cm.20065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Allen RD, Wolf RW. Membrane recycling at the cytoproct of Tetrahymena. J Cell Sci. 1979;35:217–227. doi: 10.1242/jcs.35.1.217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Huynh KK, Kay JG, Stow JL, Grinstein S. Fusion, fission, and secretion during phagocytosis. Physiology (Bethesda) 2007;22:366–372. doi: 10.1152/physiol.00028.2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Flannagan RS, Cosío G, Grinstein S. Antimicrobial mechanisms of phagocytes and bacterial evasion strategies. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2009;7(5):355–366. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Weidner E, Sibley LD. Phagocytized intracellular microsporidian blocks phagosome acidification and phagosome-lysosome fusion. The Journal of protozoology. 1985;32(2):311–317. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.1985.tb03056.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Lowe CD, Minter EJ, Cameron DD, Brockhurst MA. Shining a Light on Exploitative Host Control in a Photosynthetic Endosymbiosis. Current biology : CB. 2016;26(2):207–211. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.11.052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Koubar M, Rodier MH, Garduno RA, Frere J. Passage through Tetrahymena tropicalis enhances the resistance to stress and the infectivity of Legionella pneumophila. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2011;325(1):10–15. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2011.02402.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Fok AK, Ma L, Aihara MS, Allen RD. High resolution view of the true cytosolic membrane surface of phagosomes of known ages purified from Paramecium. European journal of cell biology. 1996;71(3):259–269. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Kissmehl R, Schilde C, Wassmer T, et al. Molecular identification of 26 syntaxin genes and their assignment to the different trafficking pathways in Paramecium. Traffic. 2007;8(5):523–542. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2007.00544.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Bright LJ, Kambesis N, Nelson SB, Jeong B, Turkewitz AP. Comprehensive analysis reveals dynamic and evolutionary plasticity of Rab GTPases and membrane traffic in Tetrahymena thermophila. PLoS Genetics. 2010;6(10):e1001155. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Allen RD, Fok AK. Membrane recycling and endocytosis in Paramecium confirmed by horseradish peroxidase pulse-chase studies. Journal of cell science. 1980;45:131–145. doi: 10.1242/jcs.45.1.131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Wassmer T, Kissmehl R, Cohen J, Plattner H. Seventeen a-subunit isoforms of paramecium V-ATPase provide high specialization in localization and function. Molecular biology of the cell. 2006;17(2):917–930. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E05-06-0511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Osinska M, Wiejak J, Wypych E, Bilski H, Bartosiewicz R, Wyroba E. Distinct expression, localization and function of two Rab7 proteins encoded by paralogous genes in a free-living model eukaryote. Acta Biochim Pol. 2011;58(4):597–607. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Schilde C, Schonemann B, Sehring IM, Plattner H. Distinct subcellular localization of a group of synaptobrevin-like SNAREs in Paramecium tetraurelia and effects of silencing SNARE-specific chaperone NSF. Eukaryot Cell. 2010;9(2):288–305. doi: 10.1128/EC.00220-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Allen RD, Ma L, Fok AK. Acidosomes: recipients of multiple sources of membrane and cargo during development and maturation. Journal of cell science. 1993;106(Pt 1):411–422. doi: 10.1242/jcs.106.1.411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Sehring IM, Reiner C, Mansfeld J, Plattner H, Kissmehl R. A broad spectrum of actin paralogs in Paramecium tetraurelia cells display differential localization and function. J Cell Sci. 2007;120(Pt 1):177–190. doi: 10.1242/jcs.03313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Sugita M, Nakano K, Sato M, Toyooka K, Numata O. The roles of actin cytoskeleton and microtubules for membrane recycling of a food vacuole in Tetrahymena thermophila. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 2009;66(7):371–377. doi: 10.1002/cm.20374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Shiozaki N, Nakano K, Kushida Y, et al. ADF/cofilin is not essential but is critically important for actin activities during phagocytosis in Tetrahymena thermophila. Eukaryotic cell. 2013;12(8):1080–1086. doi: 10.1128/EC.00074-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Levin R, Grinstein S, Schlam D. Phosphoinositides in phagocytosis and macropinocytosis. Biochimica et biophysica acta. 2015;1851(6):805–823. doi: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2014.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Leondaritis G, Tiedtke A, Galanopoulou D. D-3 phosphoinositides of the ciliate Tetrahymena: characterization and study of their regulatory role in lysosomal enzyme secretion. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2005;1745(3):330–341. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2005.06.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Leondaritis G, Galanopoulou D. Emerging roles of phosphoinositide-specific phospholipases C in the ciliates Tetrahymena and Paramecium. Commun Integr Biol. 2011;4(5):576–578. doi: 10.4161/cib.4.5.16295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Leondaritis G, Sarri T, Dafnis I, Efstathiou A, Galanopoulou D. Biochemical and genetic evidence for the presence of multiple phosphatidylinositol- and phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate-specific phospholipases C in Tetrahymena. Eukaryot Cell. 2011;10(3):412–422. doi: 10.1128/EC.00272-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Nusblat AD, Bright LJ, Turkewitz AP. Conservation and innovation in Tetrahymena membrane traffic: proteins, lipids, and compartments. Methods Cell Biol. 2012;109:141–175. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-385967-9.00006-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Leondaritis G, Siokos J, Skaripa I, Galanopoulou D. Genome-wide analysis of the phosphoinositide kinome from two ciliates reveals novel evolutionary links for phosphoinositide kinases in eukaryotic cells. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(11):e78848. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078848. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Kontur C, Kumar S, Lan X, Pritchard JK, Turkewitz AP. Whole Genome Sequencing Identifies a Novel Factor Required for Secretory Granule Maturation in Tetrahymena thermophila. G3. 2016 doi: 10.1534/g3.116.028878. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Galati DF, Bonney S, Kronenberg Z, et al. DisAp-dependent striated fiber elongation is required to organize ciliary arrays. The Journal of cell biology. 2014;207(6):705–715. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201409123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Jacobs ME, DeSouza LV, Samaranayake H, Pearlman RE, Siu KW, Klobutcher LA. The Tetrahymena thermophila phagosome proteome. Eukaryot Cell. 2006;5(12):1990–2000. doi: 10.1128/EC.00195-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Samaranayake HS, Cowan AE, Klobutcher LA. Vacuolar protein sorting protein 13A, TtVPS13A, localizes to the tetrahymena thermophila phagosome membrane and is required for efficient phagocytosis. Eukaryotic cell. 2011;10(9):1207–1218. doi: 10.1128/EC.05089-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Li J, Nie Y, Dang X, Liang A, Chai B, Wang W. Characterization of a Rab11 homologue, EoRab11a, in Euplotes octocarinatus. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2009;292(2):222–230. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2009.01485.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Fukumori K, Livingston G, Leibold MA. Disturbance-mediated colonization-extinction dynamics in experimental protist metacommunities. Ecology. 2015;96(12):3234–3242. doi: 10.1890/14-2487.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Newbold CJ, de la Fuente G, Belanche A, Ramos-Morales E, McEwan NR. The Role of Ciliate Protozoa in the Rumen. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:1313. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Nicolau A, Dias N, Mota M, Lima N. Trends in the use of protozoa in the assessment of wastewater treatment. Res Microbiol. 2001;152(7):621–630. doi: 10.1016/s0923-2508(01)01241-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Kiy T, Vosskuhler C, Rasmussen L, Tiedtke A. Three pools of lysosomal enzymes in Tetrahymena thermophila. Exp Cell Res. 1993;205(2):286–292. doi: 10.1006/excr.1993.1088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Madinger CL, Collins K, Fields LG, Taron CH, Benner JS. Constitutive secretion in Tetrahymena thermophila. Eukaryot Cell. 2010;9(5):674–681. doi: 10.1128/EC.00024-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Bowman GR, Turkewitz AP. Analysis of a mutant exhibiting conditional sorting to dense core secretory granules in Tetrahymena thermophila. Genetics. 2001;159(4):1605–1616. doi: 10.1093/genetics/159.4.1605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Turkewitz AP. Out with a bang! Tetrahymena as a model system to study secretory granule biogenesis. Traffic. 2004;5(2):63–68. doi: 10.1046/j.1600-0854.2003.00155.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Rosati G, Modeo L. Extrusomes in ciliates: diversification, distribution, and phylogenetic implications. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 2003;50(6):383–402. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2003.tb00260.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Wessenberg H, Antipa G. Capture and ingestion of Paramecium by Didinium nasutum. J Protozool. 1970;17(2):250–270. [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Harumoto T, Miyake A. Defensive function of trichocysts in Paramecium. J Exp Zool. 1991;260:84–92. [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Knoll G, Haacke-Bell B, Plattner H. Local trichocyst exocytosis provides an efficient escape mechanism for Paramecium cells. Europ J Protistol. 1991;27:381–385. doi: 10.1016/S0932-4739(11)80256-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Buonanno F, Anesi A, Guella G, et al. Chemical offense by means of toxicysts in the freshwater ciliate, Coleps hirtus. The Journal of eukaryotic microbiology. 2014;61(3):293–304. doi: 10.1111/jeu.12106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Garreau de Loubresse N. Membrane Traffic in Protozoa. Vol. 2. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press; 1993. Early steps of the secretory pathway in Paramecium; pp. 27–60. [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Vayssie L, Garreau De Loubresse N, Sperling L. Growth and form of secretory granules involves stepwise assembly but not differential sorting of a family of secretory proteins in Paramecium. J Cell Sci. 2001;114(Pt 521102165):875–886. doi: 10.1242/jcs.114.5.875. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Arnaiz O, Gout JF, Betermier M, et al. Gene expression in a paleopolyploid: a transcriptome resource for the ciliate Paramecium tetraurelia. BMC Genomics. 2010;11:547. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-11-547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Huttner WB, Ohashi M, Kehlenbach RH, et al. Biogenesis of neurosecretory vesicles. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1995:315–327. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1995.060.01.036. 6096421788. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Rahaman A, Miao W, Turkewitz AP. Independent transport and sorting of functionally distinct protein families in Tetrahymena dense core secretory granules. Eukaryot Cell. 2009 doi: 10.1128/EC.00151-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Bowman GR, Elde NC, Morgan G, Winey M, Turkewitz AP. Core Formation and the Acquisition of Fusion Competence are Linked During Secretory Granule Maturation in Tetrahymena. Traffic. 2005;6(4):303–323. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2005.00273.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Verbsky JW, Turkewitz AP. Proteolytic processing and Ca2+-binding activity of dense-core vesicle polypeptides in Tetrahymena. Mol Biol Cell. 1998;9:497–511. doi: 10.1091/mbc.9.2.497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Madeddu L, Gautier MC, Le Caer JP, Garreau de Loubresse N, Sperling L. Protein processing and morphogenesis of secretory granules in Paramecium. Biochimie. 1994;76:329–335. doi: 10.1016/0300-9084(94)90167-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Kumar S, Briguglio JS, Turkewitz AP. An aspartyl cathepsin, CTH3, is essential for proprotein processing during secretory granule maturation in Tetrahymena thermophila. Molecular biology of the cell. 2014 doi: 10.1091/mbc.E14-03-0833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Kumar S, Briguglio JS, Turkewitz AP. Secretion of Polypeptide Crystals from Tetrahymena thermophila Secretory Organelles (Mucocysts) Depends on Processing by a Cysteine Cathepsin, Cth4p. Eukaryotic cell. 2015;14(8):817–833. doi: 10.1128/EC.00058-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Froissard M, Kissmehl R, Dedieu JC, Gulik-Krzywicki T, Plattner H, Cohen J. N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor is required to organize functional exocytotic microdomains in paramecium. Genetics. 2002;161(2):643–650. doi: 10.1093/genetics/161.2.643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Froissard M, Keller AM, Cohen J. ND9P, a novel protein with armadillo-like repeats involved in exocytosis: physiological studies using allelic mutants in paramecium. Genetics. 2001;157(2):611–620. doi: 10.1093/genetics/157.2.611. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Gogendeau D, Keller AM, Yanagi A, Cohen J, Koll F. Nd6p, a novel protein with RCC1-like domains involved in exocytosis in Paramecium tetraurelia. Eukaryot Cell. 2005;4(12):2129–2139. doi: 10.1128/EC.4.12.2129-2139.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Koumandou VL, Klute MJ, Herman EK, Nunez-Miguel R, Dacks JB, Field MC. Evolutionary reconstruction of the retromer complex and its function in Trypanosoma brucei. J Cell Sci. 2011;124(Pt 9):1496–1509. doi: 10.1242/jcs.081596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Briguglio JS, Kumar S, Turkewitz AP. Lysosomal sorting receptors are essential for secretory granule biogenesis in Tetrahymena. The Journal of cell biology. 2013;203(3):537–550. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201305086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Hermey G. The Vps10p-domain receptor family. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2009 doi: 10.1007/s00018-009-0043-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Sloves PJ, Delhaye S, Mouveaux T, et al. Toxoplasma Sortilin-like Receptor Regulates Protein Transport and Is Essential for Apical Secretory Organelle Biogenesis and Host Infection. Cell Host Microbe. 2012;11(5):515–527. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2012.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Marks MS, Heijnen HF, Raposo G. Lysosome-related organelles: unusual compartments become mainstream. Current opinion in cell biology. 2013;25(4):495–505. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2013.04.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Peck RK, Swiderski B, Tourmel AM. Membrane Traffic in Protozoa. Vol. 2. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press; 1993. Involvement of the trans-Golgi network, coated vesicles, vesicle fusion, and secretory product condensation in the biogenesis of Pseudomicrothorax trichocysts; pp. 1–26. [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Orias E, Flacks M, Satir BH. Isolation and ultrastructural characterization of secretory mutants of Tetrahymena thermophila. J Cell Sci. 1983;64:49–67. doi: 10.1242/jcs.64.1.49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Melia SM, Cole ES, Turkewitz AP. Mutational analysis of regulated exocytosis in Tetrahymena. J Cell Sci. 1998;111:131–140. doi: 10.1242/jcs.111.1.131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Vayssie L, Skouri F, Sperling L, Cohen J. Molecular genetics of regulated secretion in Paramecium. Biochimie. 2000;82(420324923):269–288. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9084(00)00201-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Prescott DM. The DNA of ciliated protozoa. Microbiol Rev. 1994;58(2):233–267. doi: 10.1128/mr.58.2.233-267.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Karrer KM. Tetrahymena genetics: two nuclei are better than one. Methods Cell Biol. 2000:127–186. doi: 10.1016/s0091-679x(08)61529-0. 6299432808. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Duharcourt S, Lepere G, Meyer E. Developmental genome rearrangements in ciliates: a natural genomic subtraction mediated by non-coding transcripts. Trends in genetics : TIG. 2009;25(8):344–350. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2009.05.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Jonsson F, Postberg J, Lipps HJ. The unusual way to make a genetically active nucleus. DNA and cell biology. 2009;28(2):71–78. doi: 10.1089/dna.2008.0806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Davis MC, Ward JG, Herrick G, Allis CD. Programmed nuclear death: apoptotic-like degradation of specific nuclei in conjugating Tetrahymena. Developmental biology. 1992;154(2):419–432. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(92)90080-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Akematsu T, Kobayashi T, Osada E, Fukuda Y, Endoh H, Pearlman RE. Programmed nuclear death and its relation to apoptosis and autophagy during sexual reproduction in Tetrahymena thermophila. Jpn J Protozool. 2012;45(1–2):1–15. [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Weiske-Benner A, Eckert WA. Differentiation of nuclear structure during the sexual cycle in Tetrahymena thermophila. Differentiation. 1987;34(1):1–12. [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Lu E, Wolfe J. Lysosomal enzymes in the macronucleus of Tetrahymena during its apoptosis-like degradation. Cell death and differentiation. 2001;8(3):289–297. doi: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4400807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Lamb CA, Yoshimori T, Tooze SA. The autophagosome: origins unknown, biogenesis complex. Nature reviews Molecular cell biology. 2013;14(12):759–774. doi: 10.1038/nrm3696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Kaur J, Debnath J. Autophagy at the crossroads of catabolism and anabolism. Nature reviews Molecular cell biology. 2015;16(8):461–472. doi: 10.1038/nrm4024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Stolz A, Ernst A, Dikic I. Cargo recognition and trafficking in selective autophagy. Nature cell biology. 2014;16(6):495–501. doi: 10.1038/ncb2979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Lynch-Day MA, Klionsky DJ. The Cvt pathway as a model for selective autophagy. FEBS letters. 2010;584(7):1359–1366. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2010.02.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Lai SC, Devenish RJ. LC3-Associated Phagocytosis (LAP): Connections with Host Autophagy. Cells. 2012;1(3):396–408. doi: 10.3390/cells1030396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Mijaljica D, Devenish RJ. Nucleophagy at a glance. Journal of cell science. 2013;126(Pt 19):4325–4330. doi: 10.1242/jcs.133090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Carlsson SR, Simonsen A. Membrane dynamics in autophagosome biogenesis. Journal of cell science. 2015;128(2):193–205. doi: 10.1242/jcs.141036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Okamoto K. Organellophagy: eliminating cellular building blocks via selective autophagy. The Journal of cell biology. 2014;205(4):435–445. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201402054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Duszenko M, Ginger ML, Brennand A, et al. Autophagy in protists. Autophagy. 2011;7(2):127–158. doi: 10.4161/auto.7.2.13310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Liu ML, Yao MC. Role of ATG8 and autophagy in programmed nuclear degradation in Tetrahymena thermophila. Eukaryot Cell. 2012;11(4):494–506. doi: 10.1128/EC.05296-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Martinez J, Malireddi RK, Lu Q, et al. Molecular characterization of LC3-associated phagocytosis reveals distinct roles for Rubicon, NOX2 and autophagy proteins. Nature cell biology. 2015;17(7):893–906. doi: 10.1038/ncb3192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 122.Yakisich JS, Kapler GM. The effect of phosphoinositide 3-kinase inhibitors on programmed nuclear degradation in Tetrahymena and fate of surviving nuclei. Cell Death Differ. 2004;11(10):1146–1149. doi: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4401473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Akematsu T, Fukuda Y, Attiq R, Pearlman RE. Role of class III phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase during programmed nuclear death of Tetrahymena thermophila. Autophagy. 2014;10(2):209–225. doi: 10.4161/auto.26929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Osada E, Akematsu T, Asano T, Endoh H. A novel mitochondrial nuclease-associated protein: a major executor of the programmed nuclear death in Tetrahymena thermophila. Biology of the cell. 2014;106(3):97–109. doi: 10.1111/boc.201300037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Nice DC, Sato TK, Stromhaug PE, Emr SD, Klionsky DJ. Cooperative binding of the cytoplasm to vacuole targeting pathway proteins, Cvt13 and Cvt20, to phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate at the pre-autophagosomal structure is required for selective autophagy. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2002;277(33):30198–30207. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M204736200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Kanki T, Klionsky DJ. Mitophagy in yeast occurs through a selective mechanism. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2008;283(47):32386–32393. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M802403200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Ano Y, Hattori T, Oku M, et al. A sorting nexin PpAtg24 regulates vacuolar membrane dynamics during pexophagy via binding to phosphatidylinositol-3-phosphate. Molecular biology of the cell. 2005;16(2):446–457. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E04-09-0842. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.van Weering JR, Verkade P, Cullen PJ. SNX-BAR-mediated endosome tubulation is co-ordinated with endosome maturation. Traffic. 2012;13(1):94–107. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2011.01297.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Knaevelsrud H, Soreng K, Raiborg C, et al. Membrane remodeling by the PX-BAR protein SNX18 promotes autophagosome formation. The Journal of cell biology. 2013;202(2):331–349. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201205129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Akematsu T, Pearlman RE, Endoh H. Gigantic macroautophagy in programmed nuclear death of Tetrahymena thermophila. Autophagy. 2010;6(7):901–911. doi: 10.4161/auto.6.7.13287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Jia D, Gomez TS, Metlagel Z, et al. WASH and WAVE actin regulators of the Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein (WASP) family are controlled by analogous structurally related complexes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2010;107(23):10442–10447. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0913293107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Thurston TL, Wandel MP, von Muhlinen N, Foeglein A, Randow F. Galectin 8 targets damaged vesicles for autophagy to defend cells against bacterial invasion. Nature. 2012;482(7385):414–418. doi: 10.1038/nature10744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Jiang S, Wells CD, Roach PJ. Starch-binding domain-containing protein 1 (Stbd1) and glycogen metabolism: Identification of the Atg8 family interacting motif (AIM) in Stbd1 required for interaction with GABARAPL1. Biochemical and biophysical research communications. 2011;413(3):420–425. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.08.106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.D’Angelo MA, Raices M, Panowski SH, Hetzer MW. Age-dependent deterioration of nuclear pore complexes causes a loss of nuclear integrity in postmitotic cells. Cell. 2009;136(2):284–295. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.11.037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Akematsu T, Matsuoka T. Chromatin extrusion in resting encystment of Colpoda cucullus: a possible involvement of apoptosis-like nuclear death. Cell biology international. 2008;32(1):31–38. doi: 10.1016/j.cellbi.2007.08.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Gould SB, Tham WH, Cowman AF, McFadden GI, Waller RF. Alveolins, a new family of cortical proteins that define the protist infrakingdom Alveolata. Molecular biology and evolution. 2008;25(6):1219–1230. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msn070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Plattner H. Molecular aspects of calcium signalling at the crossroads of unikont and bikont eukaryote evolution - The ciliated protozoan Paramecium in focus. Cell Calcium. 2015;57(3):174–185. doi: 10.1016/j.ceca.2014.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Schonemann B, Bledowski A, Sehring IM, Plattner H. A set of SNARE proteins in the contractile vacuole complex of Paramecium regulates cellular calcium tolerance and also contributes to organelle biogenesis. Cell Calcium. 2013;53(3):204–216. doi: 10.1016/j.ceca.2012.11.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Coyne RS, Thiagarajan M, Jones KM, et al. Refined annotation and assembly of the Tetrahymena thermophila genome sequence through EST analysis, comparative genomic hybridization, and targeted gap closure. BMC Genomics. 2008;9:562. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Eisen JA, Coyne RS, Wu M, et al. Macronuclear genome sequence of the ciliate Tetrahymena thermophila, a model eukaryote. PLoS Biol. 2006;4(9):e286. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Aury JM, Jaillon O, Duret L, et al. Global trends of whole-genome duplications revealed by the ciliate Paramecium tetraurelia. Nature. 2006;444(7116):171–178. doi: 10.1038/nature05230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Plattner H. Signalling in ciliates: long- and short-range signals and molecular determinants for cellular dynamics. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2015 doi: 10.1111/brv.12218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES