Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common joint disease throughout the world. Exosomes derived from miR-140-5p-overexpressing synovial mesenchymal stem cells (SMSC-140s) may be effective in treating OA. We hypothesized that exosomes derived from SMSC-140 (SMSC-140-Exos) would enhance the proliferation and migration abilities of articular chondrocytes (ACs) without harming extracellular matrix (ECM) secretion.
METHODS: SMSCs were transfected with or without miR-140-5p. Exosomes derived from SMSCs or SMSC-140s (SMSC-Exos or SMSC-140-Exos) were isolated and identified. Proliferation, migration and ECM secretion were measured in vitro and compared between groups. The mechanism involving alternative Wnt signalling and activation of Yes-associated protein (YAP) was investigated using lentivirus, oligonucleotides or chemical drugs. The preventative effect of exosomes in vivo was measured using Safranin-O and Fast green staining and immunohistochemical staining.
RESULTS: Wnt5a and Wnt5b carried by exosomes activated YAP via the alternative Wnt signalling pathway and enhanced proliferation and migration of chondrocytes with the side-effect of significantly decreasing ECM secretion. Highly-expressed miR-140-5p blocked this side-effect via RalA. SMSC-140-Exos enhanced the proliferation and migration of ACs without damaging ECM secretion in vitro, while in vivo, SMSC-140-Exos successfully prevented OA in a rat model.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight the promising potential of SMSC-140-Exos in preventing OA. We first found a potential source of exosomes and studied their merits and shortcomings. Based on our understanding of the molecular mechanism, we overcame the shortcomings by modifying the exosomes. Such exosomes derived from modified cells hold potential as future therapeutic strategies.
Keywords: Osteoarthritis, exosomes, synovial mesenchymal stem cells, Yes-associated protein, extracellular matrix, miR-140-5p.
Introduction
Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common joint disease throughout the world, affecting approximately 10% of men and 18% of women over 60 years of age 1. Traditional treatment of OA consists of pain management with arthroplasty for end-stage disease 2. This method does not reduce the morbidity of the early phase of the disease or address the limits of joint replacement surgery, such as the finite lifespan of the prostheses and the possibility of adverse outcomes 3. Anatomical factors are strongly associated with OA, such as hip dysplasia 4, 5, femoroacetabular impingement morphology 6, 7, varus (or valgus) knee alignment 8, 9, and leg length inequality 10. Remarkably, age is the strongest risk factor 11, while knee injury also dramatically increases the risk of OA of the knee by more than four times 12. It is therefore important to prevent or reverse the progression of early OA before it is too late.
Isolated from tissues such as bone marrow, adipose tissue, muscle, perichondrium, periosteum and recently synovium, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have become a popular choice for repairing damaged tissues 13, 14. Synovial mesenchymal stem cells (SMSCs) were first isolated from the synovial membrane surrounding joints in 200115. With tissue specificity for cartilage regeneration 16, SMSCs have been regarded as showing the greatest potential for cartilage regeneration research. However, the direct use of stem cells has limitations, such as potential immunological rejection and chromosomal variation 17, 18. It is therefore important to develop a superior strategy which can fully utilize the advantages of stem cells without the potential risks of direct usage.
Recently, increasing evidence has shown that the activation of resident cells via a paracrine mechanism may play an important role in progenitor cell-mediated tissue regeneration 19, 20. Exosomes—membrane-bound vesicles from 30 to 150 nm in diameter 21 produced by almost all cell types—may be critical for cell-cell communication 22. Evidence has shown that exosomes have similar biological function to the cells from which they are derived, and that direct use of these nanoparticles has no obvious adverse effects such as immunogenicity or tumorigenicity 23, 24. Currently, there are no reports regarding the application of exosomes derived from SMSCs in OA therapy. We hypothesized that exosomes released from SMSCs (SMSC-Exos) could be effective in helping to prevent OA.
In the present study, we used synovial membrane tissue-derived SMSCs as a “factory” to generate exosomes and found that SMSC-Exos effectively promoted chondrocyte proliferation and migration but inhibited their secretion of extracellular matrix (ECM). We planned to establish the reasons and improve the function of SMSCs-Exos.
Whilst studying the reasons for the aforementioned phenomenon, our focus turned to MSC-derived exosome-mediated-Wnt signalling 25. Exosomes were recently regarded as a potential carrier for secretion and extracellular transportation of Wnt26, 27. We measured the gene expression levels of known Wnt proteins, and found that Wnt5a and Wnt5b were highly expressed in SMSCs while other Wnt proteins were rarely expressed. Furthermore, Wnt5a and Wnt5b were enriched in SMSC-Exos.
In the Hippo-YAP signalling pathway, YAP (Yes-associated protein) is activated by de-phosphorylation and translocated into the nucleus to bind TEA domain family transcription factors and thus stimulate the expression of target genes involved in cell proliferation and migration 28-30. Wnt5a/b promotes YAP activation via the alternative Wnt signalling pathway 31. Interestingly, Wnt5a/b-YAP signalling antagonises canonical Wnt/β-catenin signalling 31 and decreases expression of a panel of the major β-catenin/TCF target genes, including SOX931, which regulates genes related to cartilage ECM 32 and cartilage formation 33, 34.
Genome-wide and gene analysis identified that miR-140-5p plays an essential role in chondrogenic differentiation of MSCs 35. Recently, miR-140-5p gained a lot of attention for playing dual roles in both cartilage homeostasis and development 36, 37 by targeting RalA to enhance SOX9 and aggrecan (ACAN) 38 and showing potential for preventing OA 39, 40.
We used miRNA microarray to measure the composition of miRNAs in SMSC-Exos and found a low expression level of miR-140-5p.
We overexpressed miR-140-5p in SMSCs and generated an improved version of the exosomes (SMSC-140-Exos) which were able to promote chondrocyte proliferation and migration with less influence on the secretion of extracellular matrix (ECM). In the OA rat model, SMSC-140-Exos successfully prevented OA.
Methods
This study was carried out in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki. All clinical samples were collected in our department, with written informed consent provided by each patient. Ethical approval was granted by the ethical committee of the Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital. All animal experiments complied with the ARRIVE guidelines. All experimental protocols were approved by the Animal Research Committee of Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine.
Isolation and characterization of SMSCs
SMSCs were isolated from synovial membranes. To identify the multiple differentiation potential, the cells were induced to differentiate by switching to osteogenic, adipogenic or chondrogenic differentiation medium. Differentiation was confirmed by analysis of cell surface markers using a Guava® easyCyte™ flow cytometer (Merck-Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany). The details are described in Supplementary Methods.
Lentivirus transfection
The lentivectors miR-140-5p, S127A, shYAP #1, and shYAP #2, were obtained from GenePharma (Shanghai, China). Lentivectors RalA, shRalA #1 and shRalA #2 were obtained from Obio Technology (Shanghai, China). Lentiviral particles of Wnt5a (sc-41112) and Wnt5b (sc-95781) shRNAs were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA, USA). Lentivirus transfection was performed following the manufacturer's instructions. The shRNA sequences used in this study were as follows:shYAP #1: 5′-CTGGTCAGAGATACTTCTTAA-3′;shYAP #2: 5′-AAGCTTTGAGTTCTGACATCC-3′;shRalA #1: 5′-CCAAGGGTCAGAATTCTTT-3′;shRalA #2: 5′-GGTCAGAATTCTTTGGCTT-3′;
Inhibition of miR-140-5p
To confirm the function of miR-140-5p, use of an inhibitor and antagomir are reliable approaches 41-43. The miR-140-5p-inhibitor, miR-140-5p-antagomir and negative control were purchased from Ribobio (Guangzhou, China). Oligonucleotide transfection was performed with riboFECT™ CP Reagents (Ribobio).
Isolation and identification of exosomes
Exosomes were isolated from the conditioned medium of SMSCs. Dynamic light scattering (DLS) analysis and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) were used to identify exosomes. RNA and protein were extracted from exosomes using a Total Exosome RNA & Protein Isolation Kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) for further analysis. DiO-labelled exosomes were used to observe exosome uptake by chondrocytes. The details are described in Supplementary Methods.
Isolation of RNA from cells
Total RNA was extracted from cells using TRIzol Reagent (Invitrogen) following the manufacturer's instructions.
Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR)
For miRNA, synthesis of cDNA and qRT-PCR was performed using a human microRNA qRT-PCR detection kit specifically for hsa-miR-140-5p and RNU6B (BioTNT, Shanghai, China). RNU6B was used for normalization of the results. The sequences are provided in Supplementary Methods.
For the mRNA, synthesis of cDNA was performed using TransScript® All-in-One First-Strand cDNA Synthesis SuperMix for qPCR (Transgen Biotech, Beijing, China). Real-time qPCR was performed using TransStart® Top Green qPCR SuperMix (Transgen Biotech), and β-actin was used for normalization of the results. The primer sequences are provided in Supplementary Methods.
Western blotting
The protocol and procedure for western blotting were as described in our previous reports 30, 44, 45. The anti-p-YAP (Ser127), anti-YAP, anti-RalA and anti-β-actin primary antibodies were obtained from Cell Signalling Technology (Danvers, MA, USA). The anti-Wnt5a, anti-Wnt5b, anti-Aggrecan and anti-SOX9 primary antibodies were obtained from Abcam (Cambridge, MA, USA). The anti-CD63, anti-CD9, anti-CD81 and anti-Alix were obtained from System Biosciences (Palo Alto, CA, USA). Based on previous research 46, 47, collagen type II was analysed using 5% (wt/vol) SDS-PAGE with anti-collagen type II primary antibodies (Chemicon®, Merck-Millipore).
miRNA microarray
Total RNA was analysed by microarray according to the manufacturer's protocol. Briefly, total RNA (100 ng) was labelled with the microRNA Complete Labelling and Hyb Kit (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA), and then hybridized to the Agilent Human miRNA microarray V21.0 (8×60K) for 2549 human microRNAs. After hybridization, the microarray was washed using a Gene Expression Wash Buffer kit (Agilent). Hybridization signals were then scanned with the Agilent Microarray Scanner (Agilent) using Agilent scan control software Version A7.0 (Agilent). The data collection, background subtraction and within array normalization were performed by Agilent Feature Extraction Software (Agilent). Percentile normalization and principal component analysis were performed by Gene spring 12.0 (Agilent).
Immunofluorescence analysis
For immunofluorescence, after reaching more than 80% confluence, chondrocytes were transferred to serum-free culture medium for 24 h and then incubated in complete culture medium with various exosomes for an additional three hours. The cells were then washed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min. The fixed cells were permeabilised with 0.1% Triton X-100 for 5 min and washed with PBS three times. Then, the cells were treated with primary antibodies overnight at 4°C in PBS supplemented with 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA). Cells were washed a further three times, then the secondary Alexa Fluor® 488-conjugated antibody (Cell Signalling Technology) was added and incubated for 1 h at room temperature. After washing using PBS, cells were mounted in ProLong® Diamond Antifade Mountant with DAPI (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and randomly-selected fields were imaged using an LSM-880 confocal fluorescence microscope (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany).
In vitro response of chondrocytes to SMSC-Exos and SMSC-140-Exos
Cells and cell culture
Human cartilage obtained from the resected lateral femoral condyle of patients, aged from 45 to 55 years old, undergoing total knee arthroplasty (THA), was minced into small pieces and digested using collagenase type II (Gibco) which was diluted in complete chondrocyte culture medium: DMEM/F12 (Hyclone) supplemented with 10% foetal bovine serum (FBS), penicillin/streptomycin (PS) and 250 ng/mL amphotericin B (Gibco). After overnight digestion, the whole mix was filtered through a 70 μm cell strainer (Falcon, BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) then plated into T25 flasks in 10 mL complete chondrocyte culture medium and cultured for 14 days as Passage 0 (P0). Then the cells were digested using trypsin-EDTA and counted. Half of the P0 articular chondrocytes were preserved at -80°C using CELLSAVING (New Cell & Molecular Biotech, Suzhou, China). The rest were cultured and passaged for subsequent study.
Proliferation of chondrocytes
The effect of stimulation with various exosomes or lentivirus transfection on chondrocytes was measured using an EdU-488 Cell Proliferation Kit (Ribobio) with flow cytometry following the manufacturer's instructions. In brief, normal chondrocytes or chondrocytes transfected with lentiviral vectors or empty vector, at an initial density of 2 × 104 cells/well, were seeded into 48-well plates and cultured with various exosomes for 12 h. Next, EdU working solution, consisting of 150 μL of complete chondrocyte culture medium containing 0.15 μL of EdU, was added into each well and incubated for 3 h at 37°C. Cultures were then digested using trypsin-EDTA, washed using PBS, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 15 min, neutralized with 2 mg/mL glycine and washed twice in PBS before permeabilising with 0.4% Triton X-100 for 5 mins and finally washing twice with PBS. The labelled cells were resuspended using the Apollo staining solution in the kit by incubating for 10 min, then washed twice in 0.4% Triton X-100 and resuspended in PBS for analysis using the Guava® easyCyte™ flow cytometer.
Migration of chondrocytes
The effect of stimulation of chondrocytes with various exosomes or lentivirus transfection was evaluated using a transwell assay. In brief, after digestion and counting, approximately 5 × 104 cells were seeded into the upper chamber of a 24-well 8-μm-pore-size transwell plate (Corning, Corning, NY, USA). Next, 600 μL of complete chondrocyte culture medium containing various exosomes was added into the lower chamber of the transwell plate before incubation for 12 h at 37°C. The upper chamber was then fixed with 4% PFA for 15 min, stained with 0.5% crystal violet for 10 min and washed with PBS three times. The upper surface of the upper chamber was carefully wiped using a cotton swab to remove cells which had not migrated to the lower surface. Five randomly-selected fields (100 × magnification) per well were photographed using a Leica microscope and assessed by two pathologists in a blinded manner.
Animal studies
Male Sprague-Dawley rats (approximately 12 weeks old) weighing 300-350 g, housed in a specific pathogen-free (SPF) animal laboratory with 12:12 hours light/dark cycle, controlled temperature environment (23-25°C) and steady humidity (55-70%), were used in these studies. Based on former studies 48, the OA model was established by transecting the medial collateral ligament and the medial meniscus completely, by cutting the meniscus at the narrowest point without damaging the tibial surface, and transecting the anterior cruciate ligament. After surgery, all rats received 0.05 mg/kg buprenorphine for pain relief together with 5 mg/kg gentamicin. All Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into four groups: (1) Normal group (without surgery; received articular cavity injection of normal saline every time the OA group was given an injection; 10 knee joints from 5 rats, n = 10) (2) OA group (rats underwent surgery and received articular cavity injection of normal saline on the first day of every week from the 5th to the 8th week after surgery; 10 knee joints from 5 rats, n = 10); (3) OA+SMSC-Exos group (rats received articular cavity injection of SMSC-Exos (100 μL; 1011 exosome particles/mL; 10 knee joints from 5 rats, n = 10) when the OA group received saline injections); (4) OA+SMSC-140-Exos group (Rats received articular cavity injection of SMSC-140-Exos (100 μL; 1011 exosomes particles/mL) when the OA group received saline injection; 10 knee joints from 5 rats, n = 10).
Twelve weeks after surgery, rats were sacrificed by anaesthetic overdose and the knee samples were harvested to evaluate disease progression.
Histology and immunohistochemical analysis
The tibiofemoral joints were removed and the femoral condyles were fixed in neutral-buffered formalin (containing 4% formaldehyde) for 24 h after the knee samples were harvested. The fixed femoral condyles were decalcified in EDTA for 21 days, refreshed every day, before graded ethanol dehydration, dimethylbenzene vitrification, paraffin embedding and tissue sectioning (5 μm).
Safranin-O & fast green-stained sections were used to evaluate matrix proteoglycan and overall joint morphology 49, 50.
Immunohistochemistry was performed to evaluate the function of articular chondrocytes. Anti-type II collagen, anti-type I collagen and anti-aggrecan antibodies were used as primary antibodies (all from Abcam, 1:100).
Pictures at high magnification were randomly captured and evaluated by two different pathologists.
Based on safranin O-fast green staining, OARSI score 51, which is a well-recognized histological scoring system 52, was used by two different blinded pathologists to evaluate the OA progress of every sample in each group.
Statistical analysis
Numerical data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). All statistical analyses in this study were performed using SPSS 16.0 software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). The significance of differences between two groups was analysed using Student's t test. A P value < 0.05 was considered significant.
Results
Isolation and identification of SMSCs
SMSCs were isolated from synovial membrane as described in the Methods section. At passage 5 (P5), SMSCs were identified and used in subsequent experiments. After reaching 80-90% confluence, cells adopted a spindle-like shape (Figure 1A).
When cultured in osteogenic, adipogenic or chondrogenic medium, the SMSCs could readily be induced to differentiate along the osteogenic, adiopogenic and chondrogenic pathways, respectively. Osteogenic potential was confirmed by staining of calcium mineral deposits with Alizarin Red (Figure 1B, left panel), while adipogenic potential was evaluated by observation of small cytoplasmic lipid droplets stained using Oil Red O (Figure 1B, middle panel). Chondrogenic potential was confirmed by sectioning beads and staining sulphated glycosaminoglycans using Alcian blue (Figure 1B, right panels). The representative morphology of chondrocytes, typically round and plump, was observed.
Following the criteria for identifying stem cells, we analysed the surface markers of SMSCs. Analysis of surface antigen expression using flow cytometry demonstrated that SMSCs were positive for CD44, CD73, CD90, CD105 and CD151, and negative for CD34, CD45, and CD133 (Figure 1C).
Isolation and identification of exosomes derived from SMSCs
Dynamic light scattering (DLS), transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and western blotting were used to characterize the particles secreted from SMSCs. The results showed that most of these vesicles ranged from 30 to 150 nm in size (Figure 1D). These hollow spherical microvesicles (Figure 1E) were further confirmed by western blotting. The expression of the exosome markers CD63, CD9, CD81 and Alix (Figure 1F) were significantly enriched in exosomes. All these data indicate that exosomes were successfully isolated.
Internalization of exosomes by articular chondrocytes
To confirm whether the chondrocytes could take up exosomes derived from SMSCs, SMSCs were labelled using green fluorescent lipophilic dye (Vybrant DiO) before harvesting the exosomes. Chondrocytes were then incubated for 6 h with exosomes derived from labelled cells. After washing with PBS, the DiO-labelled exosomes were observed in the perinuclear region of the chondrocytes (Figure 1G), confirming the internalization by chondrocytes.
SMSC-Exos activated YAP, decreased ECM secretion of articular chondrocytes, and induced proliferation and migration of articular chondrocytes
After quantifying the exosomes using an ExoELISA kit, we stimulated chondrocytes using 0, 1, 5, or 10 × 1011 particles/mL of SMSC-Exos for 24 h. Then, the levels of characterized downstream targets of YAP signalling, including ANKRD1, CTGF and Cyr6153, were analysed using qPCR. The data showed that levels of these YAP downstream genes were enhanced in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 2A). To confirm the activation of YAP, western blotting and fluorescence confocal assays were performed. The results revealed that YAP was activated by SMSC-Exos via de-phosphorylation (Figure 2B). The activated YAP was localized in the nucleus (Figure 2C) and activated the downstream genes to be translated.
Flow cytometry with an EdU kit showed that the proliferative ability of chondrocytes was dramatically enhanced by SMSC-Exos (Figure 2D). We also found that the migratory ability of chondrocytes was obviously strengthened by SMSC-Exos (Figure 2E).
However, the function of chondrocytes including ECM secretion was obviously suppressed by SMSC-Exos (Figure 2F-G), as analysed using qPCR and western blotting.
SMSC-Exos activated YAP, decreased ECM secretion, and induced proliferation and migration of articular chondrocytes via Wnt5a and Wnt5b
To elucidate the mechanism behind these phenomena in chondrocytes stimulated by SMSC-Exos, we analysed the gene expression levels of Wnt family members in SMSCs and found that Wnt5a and Wnt5b were highly expressed (Figure 3A). We also confirmed that the protein levels of Wnt5a and Wnt5b were highly expressed in both SMSCs and exosomes derived from them using western blotting (Figure 1F).
After suppressing the expression level of both Wnt5a and Wnt 5b using lentiviral shRNA, we found no evidence of YAP activation (Figure 3B-D), nor of enhanced proliferation and migration abilities (Figure 3E-F) or inhibition of chondrocyte functions including ECM secretion (Figure 3G-H).
All these data indicated that Wnt5a and Wnt5b were the major effector molecules of SMSC-Exos.
SMSC-Exos decreased ECM secretion and induced proliferation and migration of articular chondrocytes through activation of YAP
Next, we aimed to clarify whether YAP activation via the alternative Wnt signalling pathway was responsible for the effects caused by Wnt5a and Wnt5b.
We overexpressed S127A, a mutant of YAP protein that generates a constitutively active YAP 30, in chondrocytes. The efficiency of S127A transfection was analysed using qPCR (Figure 4A). We found that YAP activation had the same effects as SMSC-Exos stimulation on cell proliferation (Figure 4B), cell migration (Figure 4C) and chondrocyte functions including ECM secretion (Figure 4D-E).
To further verify that YAP is the key molecule, two YAP shRNAs (shYAP #1 and shYAP #2) were designed and their inhibitory efficiency was verified using qPCR (Figure 4F). The proliferation and migration abilities were weak in chondrocytes transfected with shYAP and could not be enhanced by SMSC-Exos (Figure 4G-H). Further, the effects on chondrocyte function including ECM secretion were blocked by down-regulation of YAP (Figure 4I-J).
To verify the role of the YAP-TEAD complex in the effects on chondrocyte function including ECM secretion, we used verteporfin, a chemical which can disrupt YAP-TEAD interaction 54, and further confirmed that the suppression of ECM secretion caused by SMSC-Exos was rescued by verteporfin (Figure 4K).
miR-140-5p maintained the function of articular chondrocytes
In addition to proteins, miRNAs are another type of key molecule in exosomes 24. We used miRNA microarray to measure expression levels of various miRNAs (Figure 5A). The expression levels of highly-expressed miRNAs and miR-140-5p/miR-140-3p which had attracted our interest are shown in Figure 5B. To date there is no clear link between the highly-expressed miRNA in exosomes and chondrocyte function. The miR-140-5p which is closely related to chondrocyte function is rarely expressed in SMSC-Exos.
We modified SMSC-Exos by miR-140-5p overexpression after verifying the function of miR-140-5p. Existing research 38 indicated that miR-140-5p may target RalA to translationally enhance SOX9 and Aggrecan. We designed two shRNAs for RalA (shRalA #1 and shRalA #2) and tested the inhibitory efficiency using qPCR (Figure 5C). The chondrocytes transfected with shRalA #1 were then used for subsequent experiments. The efficiency of RalA overexpression was also tested by qPCR (Figure 5C).
The experimental results (Figure 5D-E) show that miR-140-5p suppressed RalA and upregulated SOX9, ACAN and collagen type II and that this effect could be blocked by RalA overexpression. Further, shRalA #1 transfection had similar effects to miR-140-5p overexpression.
Exosomes derived from miR-140-5p-overexpressing SMSCs (SMSC-140-Exos) induced proliferation and migration of AC without decreasing ECM secretion
We overexpressed miR-140-5p in SMSCs and obtained the exosomes derived from miR-140-5p-overexpressing SMSCs (SMSC-140-Exos). The expression level of miR-140-5p was obviously upregulated in SMSC-140-Exos compared to SMSC-Exos. In addition, the expression level of miR-140-5p of chondrocytes treated with SMSC-140-Exos was higher compared to chondrocytes treated with SMSC-Exos (Figure 5F) when analysed by qPCR.
SMSC-140-Exos had similar effects on YAP activation, proliferation and migration of chondrocytes (Figure 6A-D) without obvious suppression of ECM secretion (Figure 6E-F and H) compared to SMSC-Exos.
To verify the function of miR-140-5p in SMSC-140-Exos, we used two methods, miR-140-5p-inhibitor and miR-140-5p-antagomir, to block the miR-140-5p which was transferred into chondrocytes. The results indicated that the functions of chondrocytes, including ECM secretion, were maintained by miR-140-5p (Figure 6 G).
SMSC-140-Exos prevented OA
We verified the potential of exosomes for OA prevention in an OA rat model (Figure 7A). We also found that no obvious adverse events occurred in any experimental group.
In the OA group, severe joint wear and cartilage matrix loss were observed. The expression of type II collagen and aggrecan in cartilage had decreased, while expression of type I collagen was observed on the cartilage surface.
In the OA+SMSC-Exos group, joint wear and cartilage matrix loss were also observed. However, these were much less severe compared to the OA group. The cartilage matrix consisting of type II collagen was thin and cartilage cells were arranged in dense clusters of chondrocytes rather than the normal arrangement of neat rows. Expression of aggrecan was low while type I collagen was obviously expressed in the cartilage matrix.
In the OA+SMSC-140-Exos group, joint wear was still present but the severity was very mild. The cartilage matrix consisting of type II collagen was slightly thinner than in the normal group but significantly better than in the OA group or the OA+SMSC-Exos group. There was no obvious decrease of aggrecan expression, and no type I collagen expression was observed in the cartilage matrix.
These data indicated that SMSC-140-Exos slowed the progression of early OA and prevented the severe damage to knee articular cartilage in the OA model caused by instability of the knee joint.
The chondrocyte counts and OARSI scores are shown in Figure 7B.
Summary of the therapeutic mechanism
In Figure 7C, we summarize the therapeutic mechanism of SMSC-140-Exos. Wnt5a and Wnt5b activated YAP via the alternative Wnt-YAP/TAZ signalling pathway. Activation of YAP led to the enhancement of chondrocyte proliferation and migration with the side effect of decreasing SOX9 expression and ECM secretion. With the help of miR-140-5p highly expressed in SMSC-140-Exos, SOX9 was rescued via RalA inhibition and ECM secretion was successfully restored.
Discussion
The limited potential of articular cartilage for self-regeneration has been attributed to the fact that it is difficult for cells to access the injured site due to the inability of adjacent articular chondrocytes to migrate and produce matrix 55. In our study, SMSC-Exos promoted chondrocyte proliferation and migration, which are inhibited in OA 56. The drawback of SMSC-Exos is their inhibition of SOX9 and ECM generation, which was overcome by overexpressing miR-140-5p in SMSCs and using the SMSC-140-Exos.
SMSCs can easily be isolated from synovial membrane, which is easy to obtain. SMSCs were observed to proliferate vigorously and age slowly in our study. We found that SMSCs can retain their multi-potential differentiation ability even after reaching passage 10. We therefore believe that SMSCs will be a popular new option among the family of mesenchymal stem cells for tissue regeneration. Their specialties of “tissue specific” regeneration 16 give SMSCs unlimited potential in cartilage regeneration.
Recent studies have shown that paracrine mechanisms including exosomes are responsible for stem cell- or progenitor cell-mediated tissue regeneration 19, 20. We found that exosomes derived from SMSCs (SMSC-Exos) clearly promoted chondrocyte proliferation and migration. However, they had one crucial shortcoming: the inhibition of ECM protein synthesis including aggrecan and collagen II. To establish the reason for this, we measured the mRNA expression levels of Wnt family members in SMSCs and found that Wnt5a and Wnt5b were highly expressed in SMSCs. Furthermore, we found that Wnt5a and Wnt5b promoted chondrocyte proliferation and migration by activating YAP through alternative Wnt signalling pathways. The activation of YAP clearly suppressed the expression of SOX9 and led to the suppression of ECM formation.
Wnt5a and Wnt5b play important roles in early chondrogenesis57 and are able to inhibit chondrocyte hypertrophy via nuclear factor κB (NFκB) and JNK, respectively58, 59. These effects combined with enhancement of proliferation and migration may be the reason why SMSC-Exos have some protective effect on OA.
The precise function of YAP in chondrocyte differentiation is unclear. Previous studies have shown that while early chondrocyte proliferation is promoted, maturation is inhibited 60. This phenomenon is similar to the SMSC-Exos-induced activation of YAP in our study. The inhibition of chondrocyte maturation is the drawback of the use of SMSC-Exos, and consequently the therapeutic strategy needed to be optimized.
In our study, the inhibition of SOX9 and its downstream genes, including aggrecan and type II collagen, was key to the YAP-induced inhibition of maturation. The optimized therapeutic strategy is based on SOX9.
For further analysis of the composition of SMSC-Exos, we performed a miRNA microarray assay. However, the relationship between highly-expressed miRNA in SMSC-Exos and ECM formation was not clear. The function of these microRNAs needs further research. The essential microRNA in cartilage homeostasis and development, miR-140-5p, and its sister, miR-140-3p, were rarely expressed in SMSC-Exos. In view of its importance, we came up with the idea of increasing the miR-140-5p levels in SMSC-Exos.
Nucleic acids can be positively incorporated into exosomes by relying on elevated intracellular RNA concentration, which can be obtained by overexpressing nucleic acids using lentiviral-based or lipid-based systems 61. We overexpressed miR-140-5p in SMSCs and found that miR-140-5p was enriched in its derived exosomes (SMSC-140-Exos). The miR-140-5p-overexpressed SMSCs were found to be a superior cell line for preventing OA.
SMSC-140-Exos retained the advantages of SMSC-Exos without the disadvantages by rescuing SOX9 through RalA. The ability of chondrocytes to proliferate and migrate when stimulated by SMSC-140-Exos was clearly promoted without significant suppression of ECM protein synthesis.
The highly-expressed miRNAs in exosomes are shown in Figure 5B. Key miRNAs are miR-6090, which may play a role in embryo development 62; miR-4516, which is involved in autophagy63; miR-3960, which is related to Runx264, and miR-4459, which is involved in altering the stemness of embryonic stem cells65. However, the relationship between these microRNAs and chondrocytes remains unknown and needs to be further researched.
We chose an OA rat model based on knee joint instability induced by surgery. This kind of model can perfectly simulate knee joint instability caused by knee injury, including anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. It can also reasonably simulate joint wear caused by anatomical factors.
In vivo, we used SMSC-140-Exos in an OA rat model. The progression of early stage OA was delayed and the knee joint cartilage damage, which was caused by OA, was prevented by SMSC-140-Exos while the effect of SMSC-Exos was limited.
We conclude that SMSCs and their exosomes with or without some kind of modification still show tremendous potential for future exploration and use in clinical practice.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Number. 81301589, 81572239 and 81472066). We thank OEbiotech Company for technical support with the microarray studies.
Author Contributions
S.C.T. and S.C.G. carried out the main part of the studies and drafted the manuscript. Y.L.Z and W.J.Y. participated in the in vivo experiments. T.Y. participated in the design of the study. S.C.T. performed the statistical analysis. S.C.G. and C.Q.Z. conceived the study, participated in its design and coordination, and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Abbreviations
- OA
Osteoarthritis
- SMSC-140s
miR-140-5p-overexpressing synovial mesenchymal stem cells
- SMSC-140-Exos
Exosomes derived from SMSC-140s
- ACs
Articular chondrocytes
- ECM
Extracellular matrix
- YAP
Yes-associated protein
- MSCs
Mesenchymal stem cells
- SMSCs
Synovial mesenchymal stem cells
- ACAN
Aggrecan
- DLS
Dynamic light scattering
- TEM
Transmission electron microscopy
- qPCR
Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction
- BSA
Bovine serum albumin
- THA
Total knee arthroplasty
- P0
Passage 0
- PFA
Paraformaldehyde
- PBS
Phosphate Buffered Saline
- SD
Standard deviation
- P5
Passage 5
- shRNA
Small hairpin RNA
- NFκB
Nuclear factor κB
- ACL
Anterior cruciate ligament
References
- 1.Woolf AD, Pfleger B. Burden of major musculoskeletal conditions. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2003;81:646–56. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Skou ST, Roos EM, Laursen MB, Rathleff MS, Arendt-Nielsen L, Simonsen O. et al. A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Total Knee Replacement. The New England journal of medicine. 2015;373:1597–606. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1505467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Glyn-Jones S, Palmer AJ, Agricola R, Price AJ, Vincent TL, Weinans H. et al. Osteoarthritis. Lancet (London, England) 2015;386:376–87. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60802-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Agricola R, Heijboer MP, Roze RH, Reijman M, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Verhaar JA. et al. Pincer deformity does not lead to osteoarthritis of the hip whereas acetabular dysplasia does: acetabular coverage and development of osteoarthritis in a nationwide prospective cohort study (CHECK) Osteoarthritis and cartilage / OARS, Osteoarthritis Research Society. 2013;21:1514–21. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2013.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Dezateux C, Rosendahl K. Developmental dysplasia of the hip. Lancet (London, England) 2007;369:1541–52. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60710-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Agricola R, Heijboer MP, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Verhaar JA, Weinans H, Waarsing JH. Cam impingement causes osteoarthritis of the hip: a nationwide prospective cohort study (CHECK) Annals of the rheumatic diseases. 2013;72:918–23. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Zadpoor AA. Etiology of Femoroacetabular Impingement in Athletes: A Review of Recent Findings. Sports medicine (Auckland, NZ) 2015;45:1097–106. doi: 10.1007/s40279-015-0339-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Sharma L, Chmiel JS, Almagor O, Felson D, Guermazi A, Roemer F. et al. The role of varus and valgus alignment in the initial development of knee cartilage damage by MRI: the MOST study. Annals of the rheumatic diseases. 2013;72:235–40. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2011-201070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Felson DT, Niu J, Gross KD, Englund M, Sharma L, Cooke TD. et al. Valgus malalignment is a risk factor for lateral knee osteoarthritis incidence and progression: findings from the Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study and the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Arthritis and rheumatism. 2013;65:355–62. doi: 10.1002/art.37726. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Harvey WF, Yang M, Cooke TD, Segal NA, Lane N, Lewis CE. et al. Association of leg-length inequality with knee osteoarthritis: a cohort study. Annals of internal medicine. 2010;152:287–95. doi: 10.1059/0003-4819-152-5-201003020-00006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lawrence RC, Felson DT, Helmick CG, Arnold LM, Choi H, Deyo RA. et al. Estimates of the prevalence of arthritis and other rheumatic conditions in the United States. Part II. Arthritis and rheumatism. 2008;58:26–35. doi: 10.1002/art.23176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Muthuri SG, McWilliams DF, Doherty M, Zhang W. History of knee injuries and knee osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Osteoarthritis and cartilage / OARS, Osteoarthritis Research Society. 2011;19:1286–93. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2011.07.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Jiang Y, Jahagirdar BN, Reinhardt RL, Schwartz RE, Keene CD, Ortiz-Gonzalez XR. et al. Pluripotency of mesenchymal stem cells derived from adult marrow. Nature. 2002;418:41–9. doi: 10.1038/nature00870. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kurth TB, Dell'accio F, Crouch V, Augello A, Sharpe PT, De Bari C. Functional mesenchymal stem cell niches in adult mouse knee joint synovium in vivo. Arthritis and rheumatism. 2011;63:1289–300. doi: 10.1002/art.30234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.De Bari C, Dell'Accio F, Tylzanowski P, Luyten FP. Multipotent mesenchymal stem cells from adult human synovial membrane. Arthritis and rheumatism. 2001;44:1928–42. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(200108)44:8<1928::AID-ART331>3.0.CO;2-P. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Jones BA, Pei M. Synovium-derived stem cells: a tissue-specific stem cell for cartilage engineering and regeneration. Tissue engineering Part B, Reviews. 2012;18:301–11. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEB.2012.0002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Amariglio N, Hirshberg A, Scheithauer BW, Cohen Y, Loewenthal R, Trakhtenbrot L. et al. Donor-derived brain tumor following neural stem cell transplantation in an ataxia telangiectasia patient. PLoS medicine. 2009;6:e1000029. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Herberts CA, Kwa MS, Hermsen HP. Risk factors in the development of stem cell therapy. Journal of translational medicine. 2011;9:29. doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-9-29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kim JY, Song SH, Kim KL, Ko JJ, Im JE, Yie SW. et al. Human cord blood-derived endothelial progenitor cells and their conditioned media exhibit therapeutic equivalence for diabetic wound healing. Cell transplantation. 2010;19:1635–44. doi: 10.3727/096368910X516637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Zhang M, Malik AB, Rehman J. Endothelial progenitor cells and vascular repair. Current opinion in hematology. 2014;21:224–8. doi: 10.1097/MOH.0000000000000041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Zhou J, Wang S, Sun K, Chng WJ. The emerging roles of exosomes in leukemogeneis. Oncotarget; 2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Thery C, Ostrowski M, Segura E. Membrane vesicles as conveyors of immune responses. Nature reviews Immunology. 2009;9:581–93. doi: 10.1038/nri2567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Burger D, Vinas JL, Akbari S, Dehak H, Knoll W, Gutsol A. et al. Human endothelial colony-forming cells protect against acute kidney injury: role of exosomes. The American journal of pathology. 2015;185:2309–23. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2015.04.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Xin H, Li Y, Chopp M. Exosomes/miRNAs as mediating cell-based therapy of stroke. Frontiers in cellular neuroscience. 2014;8:377. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2014.00377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Zhang B, Wang M, Gong A, Zhang X, Wu X, Zhu Y. et al. HucMSC-Exosome Mediated-Wnt4 Signaling Is Required for Cutaneous Wound Healing. Stem cells (Dayton, Ohio) 2015;33:2158–68. doi: 10.1002/stem.1771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Zhang L, Wrana JL. The emerging role of exosomes in Wnt secretion and transport. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2014;27:14–9. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2014.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Gross JC, Chaudhary V, Bartscherer K, Boutros M. Active Wnt proteins are secreted on exosomes. Nat Cell Biol. 2012;14:1036–45. doi: 10.1038/ncb2574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Meng Z, Moroishi T, Guan KL. Mechanisms of Hippo pathway regulation. Genes Dev. 2016;30:1–17. doi: 10.1101/gad.274027.115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Yu FX, Zhao B, Guan KL. Hippo Pathway in Organ Size Control, Tissue Homeostasis, and Cancer. Cell. 2015;163:811–28. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.10.044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Tao SC, Gao YS, Zhu HY, Yin JH, Chen YX, Zhang YL. et al. Decreased extracellular pH inhibits osteogenesis through proton-sensing GPR4-mediated suppression of yes-associated protein. Sci Rep. 2016;6:26835. doi: 10.1038/srep26835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Park HW, Kim YC, Yu B, Moroishi T, Mo JS, Plouffe SW. et al. Alternative Wnt Signaling Activates YAP/TAZ. Cell. 2015;162:780–94. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.07.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Bell DM, Leung KK, Wheatley SC, Ng LJ, Zhou S, Ling KW. et al. SOX9 directly regulates the type-II collagen gene. Nat Genet. 1997;16:174–8. doi: 10.1038/ng0697-174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Oldershaw RA, Baxter MA, Lowe ET, Bates N, Grady LM, Soncin F. et al. Directed differentiation of human embryonic stem cells toward chondrocytes. Nat Biotechnol. 2010;28:1187–94. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Liu CF, Lefebvre V. The transcription factors SOX9 and SOX5/SOX6 cooperate genome-wide through super-enhancers to drive chondrogenesis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43:8183–203. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv688. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Barter MJ, Tselepi M, Gomez R, Woods S, Hui W, Smith GR. et al. Genome-Wide MicroRNA and Gene Analysis of Mesenchymal Stem Cell Chondrogenesis Identifies an Essential Role and Multiple Targets for miR-140-5p. Stem cells (Dayton, Ohio) 2015;33:3266–80. doi: 10.1002/stem.2093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Miyaki S, Sato T, Inoue A, Otsuki S, Ito Y, Yokoyama S. et al. MicroRNA-140 plays dual roles in both cartilage development and homeostasis. Genes & development. 2010;24:1173–85. doi: 10.1101/gad.1915510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Buechli ME, Lamarre J, Koch TG. MicroRNA-140 expression during chondrogenic differentiation of equine cord blood-derived mesenchymal stromal cells. Stem Cells Dev. 2013;22:1288–96. doi: 10.1089/scd.2012.0411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Karlsen TA, Jakobsen RB, Mikkelsen TS, Brinchmann JE. microRNA-140 targets RALA and regulates chondrogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells by translational enhancement of SOX9 and ACAN. Stem cells and development. 2014;23:290–304. doi: 10.1089/scd.2013.0209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Liang Y, Duan L, Xiong J, Zhu W, Liu Q, Wang D. et al. E2 regulates MMP-13 via targeting miR-140 in IL-1beta-induced extracellular matrix degradation in human chondrocytes. Arthritis Res Ther. 2016;18:105. doi: 10.1186/s13075-016-0997-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Li X, Zhen Z, Tang G, Zheng C, Yang G. MiR-29a and MiR-140 Protect Chondrocytes against the Anti-Proliferation and Cell Matrix Signaling Changes by IL-1beta. Mol Cells. 2016;39:103–10. doi: 10.14348/molcells.2016.2179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Ding J, Huang S, Wu S, Zhao Y, Liang L, Yan M. et al. Gain of miR-151 on chromosome 8q24.3 facilitates tumour cell migration and spreading through downregulating RhoGDIA. Nat Cell Biol. 2010;12:390–9. doi: 10.1038/ncb2039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Wu J, Wu G, Lv L, Ren YF, Zhang XJ, Xue YF. et al. MicroRNA-34a inhibits migration and invasion of colon cancer cells via targeting to Fra-1. Carcinogenesis. 2012;33:519–28. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgr304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Du J, Wang J, Tan G, Cai Z, Zhang L, Tang B. et al. Aberrant elevated microRNA-146a in dendritic cells (DC) induced by human pancreatic cancer cell line BxPC-3-conditioned medium inhibits DC maturation and activation. Med Oncol. 2012;29:2814–23. doi: 10.1007/s12032-012-0175-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Zhu H, Cheng X, Niu X, Zhang Y, Guan J, Liu X. et al. Proton-sensing GPCR-YAP Signalling Promotes Cell Proliferation and Survival. Int J Biol Sci. 2015;11:1181–9. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.12500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Zhu H, Guo S, Zhang Y, Yin J, Yin W, Tao S. et al. Proton-sensing GPCR-YAP Signalling Promotes Cancer-associated Fibroblast Activation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Int J Biol Sci. 2016;12:389–96. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.13688. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Aszodi A, Chan D, Hunziker E, Bateman JF, Fassler R. Collagen II is essential for the removal of the notochord and the formation of intervertebral discs. J Cell Biol. 1998;143:1399–412. doi: 10.1083/jcb.143.5.1399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Lee WK, Yu SM, Cheong SW, Sonn JK, Kim SJ. Ectopic expression of cyclooxygenase-2-induced dedifferentiation in articular chondrocytes. Exp Mol Med. 2008;40:721–7. doi: 10.3858/emm.2008.40.6.721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Prasadam I, Zhou Y, Shi W, Crawford R, Xiao Y. Role of dentin matrix protein 1 in cartilage redifferentiation and osteoarthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2014;53:2280–7. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keu262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Sagar DR, Ashraf S, Xu L, Burston JJ, Menhinick MR, Poulter CL. et al. Osteoprotegerin reduces the development of pain behaviour and joint pathology in a model of osteoarthritis. Annals of the rheumatic diseases. 2014;73:1558–65. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Janusz MJ, Hookfin EB, Heitmeyer SA, Woessner JF, Freemont AJ, Hoyland JA. et al. Moderation of iodoacetate-induced experimental osteoarthritis in rats by matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors. Osteoarthritis and cartilage / OARS, Osteoarthritis Research Society. 2001;9:751–60. doi: 10.1053/joca.2001.0472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Pritzker KP, Gay S, Jimenez SA, Ostergaard K, Pelletier JP, Revell PA. et al. Osteoarthritis cartilage histopathology: grading and staging. Osteoarthritis and cartilage / OARS, Osteoarthritis Research Society. 2006;14:13–29. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2005.07.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Zhen G, Wen C, Jia X, Li Y, Crane JL, Mears SC. et al. Inhibition of TGF-beta signaling in mesenchymal stem cells of subchondral bone attenuates osteoarthritis. Nat Med. 2013;19:704–12. doi: 10.1038/nm.3143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Yimlamai D, Christodoulou C, Galli GG, Yanger K, Pepe-Mooney B, Gurung B. et al. Hippo pathway activity influences liver cell fate. Cell. 2014;157:1324–38. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.03.060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Liu-Chittenden Y, Huang B, Shim JS, Chen Q, Lee SJ, Anders RA. et al. Genetic and pharmacological disruption of the TEAD-YAP complex suppresses the oncogenic activity of YAP. Genes & development. 2012;26:1300–5. doi: 10.1101/gad.192856.112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Im GI. Regeneration of articular cartilage using adipose stem cells. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2016;104:1830–44. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.35705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Hu W, Zhang W, Li F, Guo F, Chen A. miR-139 is up-regulated in osteoarthritis and inhibits chondrocyte proliferation and migration possibly via suppressing EIF4G2 and IGF1R. Biochemical and biophysical research communications. 2016;474:296–302. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.03.164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Church V, Nohno T, Linker C, Marcelle C, Francis-West P. Wnt regulation of chondrocyte differentiation. J Cell Sci. 2002;115:4809–18. doi: 10.1242/jcs.00152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Bradley EW, Drissi MH. Wnt5b regulates mesenchymal cell aggregation and chondrocyte differentiation through the planar cell polarity pathway. J Cell Physiol. 2011;226:1683–93. doi: 10.1002/jcp.22499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Bradley EW, Drissi MH. WNT5A regulates chondrocyte differentiation through differential use of the CaN/NFAT and IKK/NF-kappaB pathways. Mol Endocrinol. 2010;24:1581–93. doi: 10.1210/me.2010-0037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Deng Y, Wu A, Li P, Li G, Qin L, Song H. et al. Yap1 Regulates Multiple Steps of Chondrocyte Differentiation during Skeletal Development and Bone Repair. Cell Rep. 2016;14:2224–37. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.02.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Ferguson SW, Nguyen J. Exosomes as therapeutics: The implications of molecular composition and exosomal heterogeneity. J Control Release. 2016;228:179–90. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.02.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Ma G, Luo Y, Zhu H, Luo Y, Korhonen PK, Young ND. et al. MicroRNAs of Toxocara canis and their predicted functional roles. Parasit Vectors. 2016;9:229. doi: 10.1186/s13071-016-1508-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Li X, Lv Y, Hao J, Sun H, Gao N, Zhang C, Role of microRNA-4516 involved autophagy associated with exposure to fine particulate matter. Oncotarget; 2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Xia ZY, Hu Y, Xie PL, Tang SY, Luo XH, Liao EY. et al. Runx2/miR-3960/miR-2861 Positive Feedback Loop Is Responsible for Osteogenic Transdifferentiation of Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:624037. doi: 10.1155/2015/624037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Lu W, Han L, Su L, Zhao J, Zhang Y, Zhang S. et al. A 3'UTR-associated RNA, FLJ11812 maintains stemness of human embryonic stem cells by targeting miR-4459. Stem cells and development. 2015;24:1133–40. doi: 10.1089/scd.2014.0353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.