Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Trends Immunol. 2016 May 25;37(7):427–439. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2016.04.009

REGULATION OF THE T-CELL RESPONSE BY CD39

Maisa C Takenaka 1, Simon Robson 2,*, Francisco J Quintana 1,3,*
PMCID: PMC5215082  NIHMSID: NIHMS790495  PMID: 27236363

Abstract

The ectonucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolase 1 (ENTPD1, or CD39) catalyzes the phosphohydrolysis of extracellular adenosine triphosphate (eATP) and diphosphate (eADP) released under conditions of inflammatory stress and cell injury. CD39 generates adenosine monophosphate (AMP), which is in turn used by the ecto-5’-nucleotidase CD73 to synthesize adenosine. These ectonucleotidases have major impacts on the dynamic equilibrium of pro-inflammatory eATP and ADP nucleotides vs. immunosuppressive adenosine nucleosides. Indeed, CD39 plays a dominant role in the purinergic regulation of inflammation and the immune response because its expression is influenced by genetic and environmental factors. Here, we review the specific role of CD39 in the kinetic regulation of cellular immune responses in the evolution of disease. We focus on the effects of CD39 on T cells and explore potential clinical applications in autoimmunity, chronic infections and cancer.

Purinergic signaling – the basics

Adenosine 5’-triphosphate (ATP) and diphosphate are nucleoside tri and di-phosphates that play important pathophysiological roles. Intracellular ATP is the main energy currency in the cell, participating in virtually all biological processes. ATP and other nucleotides are released to the extracellular space under basal, quiescent or activated conditions such as during cell death or apoptosis. Extracellular ATP (eATP) and related derivatives play important functions as signaling molecules, participating in both autocrine and paracrine circuits. These circuits regulate cellular metabolism, migration, proliferation and apoptosis through signaling pathways triggered by type 2 purinergic/pyrimidinergic P2Y and P2X receptors (1, 2).

Purinergic signaling is an important regulator of the immune response. Indeed, eATP is usually a strong pro-inflammatory signal, while extracellular adenosine produced from eATP degradation is mainly immunosuppressive (Fig. 1). Thus, it is not surprising that eATP levels and biological effects are tightly regulated by the catalytic effects of ecto-enzymes expressed on the plasma membrane of immune cells.

Figure 1. Modulation of the T-cell response by eATP.

Figure 1

eATP boosts T-cell activation and modulates CD4+ T-cell differentiation. eATP-triggered activation of P2rX7 inhibits the differentiation of FoxP3+ Tregs and Tr1 cells, while it promotes the differentiation of Th17 cells. Moreover, eATP destabilizes FoxP3+ Tregs and induces apoptosis.

In this context there are major groups of ectonucleotidase families discovered, then cloned and functionally characterized using pharmacological agents and other means. These families include alkaline phosphatases, ectonucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolases (E-NTPDase) and the ecto-nucleotide pyrophosphatases/ phosphodiesterases (ENPP). Other ecto-enzymes involved in the catalysis of extracellular nucleotides and nucleosides include ecto-5’-nucleotidase CD73, adenosine deaminases and NAD glycohydrolases, CD38/NADase, dinucleoside polyphosphate hydrolases, adenylate kinase, nucleoside diphosphate kinase, and potentially ecto-F1-Fo ATP synthases (reviewed in (3)).

This review focuses on the biology of two ectonucleotidases, which play central immunoregulatory roles: CD39, the prototypic member of the ENTPD family which degrades eATP into adenosine monophosphate (AMP) and ecto-5’-nucleotidase CD73, which degrades eAMP into adenosine (1). Recent work has shown that ENPP1, also known as CD203a, can generate eAMP from the metabolism of NAD and ADP-ribose (4). In this manuscript, however, we will examine the specific role of CD39 in generating eAMP and note the associated links to CD73 in the regulation of the cellular immune response, with a focus on its direct and indirect effects of modulated purinergic signaling on T cells.

ATP release

ATP is almost exclusively present inside cells, where it is found at high levels with concentrations ranging from 1 to 10mM (5). In the extracellular milieu, ATP concentrations are significantly lower, in the nanomolar range (5). ATP is released into the extracellular space during necrosis and apoptosis (6, 7). In addition, inflammatory cells and platelets also release eATP during their activation in the context of inflammation, ischemia, hypoxia and the response to pathogens (6).

Different mechanisms mediate the controlled release of ATP to the extracellular medium. Pannexins are conserved transmembrane channels that allow the passage of ions and small molecules. Pannexin 1 channels participate in the release of ATP from activated T cells and dendritic cells (DCs) to the extracellular medium (2, 810). Pannexins have also been linked to ATP release during apoptosis (11, 12). In addition, the gap junction hemichannel connexin 43 is described to mediate ATP release by glial and endothelial cells during inflammation (1315). Finally, human B cells activated via the B cell receptor (BCR) and toll-like receptors can release ATP stored in Ca2+-sensitive secretory vesicles (16).

The commensal flora is recognized to play an important role in the control of the immune response in the context of allergy, autoimmunity and cancer (1720). Different molecules mediate the effects of the commensal flora on the immune response, including long-chain fatty acids and tryptophan derivatives (2123). It has been recently shown that eATP produced by commensal bacteria activates purinergic signaling to promote the differentiation of intestinal T helper 17 cells (Th17) (24). Conversely, several pathogens express ectonucleotidases that may modulate the immune response through their effects on purinergic signaling (25). Thus, collectively, these findings point to different cell-and stimulus-specific mechanisms of eATP release. Moreover, these findings suggest that eATP produced by microorganisms and by host cells in response to microbial molecules such as TLR agonists plays an important role in the relationship between the host and the commensal flora (26).

eATP signaling

eATP activates P2 purinergic/pyrimidinergic receptors expressed on the surface of virtually all mammalian cells. Two families of P2 receptors have been identified, which differ in protein structure and function: inotropic P2X and metabotropic P2Y (Table 1).

Table 1.

eATP regulates the innate and adaptive immune response

Cell type P2 receptor Functional response to eATP Reference
Innate immune response Eosinophils P2Y2, P2Y6, P2X1, P2X7 Increases chemotaxis, Induce IL-8 production Mu ller et al., 2010
Idzko et al., 2003
Neutrophils P2Y2 Improve migration, phagocytosis-mediated pathogen clearance
Increases chemotaxis,
Chen et al., 2010;
Monocytes/ Macrophages P2Y2, P2X7 Activates NALP3-induced IL-1β and IL-8 production
Increases chemotaxis,
Elliott et al., 2009
Dendritic cells P2Y2, P2Y11, P2X7 Inhibits IL-12p70 and increases IL-10 production, activates NALP3-induced IL-1β and IL-8 production Idzko et al., 2002
Marteau et al., 2004
Mascanfroni et al., 2013

Adaptive immune response naive CD4+ T cells P2X7, P2X4 Amplifies TCR activation and IL-2 production, inhibits IL-27- mediated Tr1 differentiation reduce T-cell motility Schenk et l., 2008, Yip et al., 2009, Mascanfroni et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2014
FoxP3+ CD4+ T cells P2X7 Induces apoptosis, inhibits FoxP3 expression, converts Treg cells in Th17 Schenk et al., 2011;
Aswad et al., 2005
CD8+ T cells P2X7 Induces apoptosis Heiss et al., 2008

P2X receptors are oligomeric ion channels that present two transmembrane domains and an extracellular loop that binds eATP. When activated, P2X receptors promote the influx/efflux of cations and the activation of Ca2+ and K+ dependent signaling pathways. Notably, P2X receptors are only activated by eATP. Seven subtypes of P2X receptors have been identified (P2X1-P2X7), the P2X7 receptor (P2rX7) is the one that has been most studied for its role in the immune response.

P2Y receptors are G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) that present seven transmembrane domains, and are activated by ATP and also by other nucleotides such as ADP, UTP, UDP and UDP-glucose. Eight subtypes of human P2Y receptors have been identified (P2Y1, P2Y2, P2Y4, P2Y6, P2Y11, P2Y12, P2Y13, and P2Y14), which associate with different G proteins to trigger the activation of distinct signaling pathways. P2Y1, 2, 4,6 and 11 receptors are coupled to Gq/G11 that activate the phospholipase C (PLC), increasing the intracellular levels of inositol-1,4,5-triphosphate (IP3) and diacyl glycerol (DAG) and leading to the release of calcium from the endoplasmic reticulum. P2Y12, 13 and 14 receptors are coupled to Gi/0 proteins, which mainly inhibit adenylate cyclase, leading to the decrease of cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) intracellular levels and the modulation of ion channel activity (27).

P2X and P2Y receptors are both expressed on immune cells, including T and B cells, as well as DCs, macrophages and neutrophils. However, it is unclear which factors determine the signaling pathway activated by eATP in each cell type. One factor that may be involved is the local concentration of eATP, because P2X receptors are usually activated by lower eATP concentrations than P2Y receptors. An additional factor to consider is the distance of the P2 receptors to the channels, vesicles or cells that release eATP, because eATP is quickly transformed into other metabolites by cell surface ectonucleotidases. For example, in T cells and neutrophils, pannexins 1 are localized close to the P2X7 and P2Y2 receptors, which are therefore activated in an autocrine manner when ATP is released (9).

Regulation of eATP levels

The half-life of eATP is relatively short as a result of its rapid scavenging and phosphohydrolysis to AMP and adenosine by the combined activity of ectonucleotidases. Thus, considering the pro-inflammatory properties of eATP and the anti-inflammatory activity of adenosine, various families of ectonucleotidases as noted above play important roles in immune regulation (28). In this review, we focus on the ENTPD prototype family member CD39, as well as examining functional links with CD73 in the generation of adenosine.

The ENTDP family also comprises eight members, of which four (NTPDase1, 2, 3, and 8) are expressed on the cell surface and in general hydrolyze ATP or ADP, ultimately to AMP. ENTPD2 is however a preferential ecto-ATPase (29).

ENTPD1 (CD39) is found on monocytes, DCs, neutrophils, B lymphocytes and on some subsets of NK and T cells. Because of its ability to hydrolyze pro-inflammatory eATP and promote the synthesis of immuno-suppressive adenosine (in tandem with CD73), CD39 has important roles in limiting inflammation (Table 2).

Table 2.

Ectonucleotidases expression on the immune cells

Cell type Ectonucleotidase Ligand Function Reference
Monocytes/ macrophages CD39 ATP, ADP Self-limiting activation process Lévesque et al., 2010
dendritic cells CD39 ATP, ADP Inhibits activation NALP3-mediated eATP Mascanfroni et al., 2013
B cells CD39, CD73 ATP, ADP
AMP
Class switch recombination Schena et al., 2013
FoxP3+ CD4+
Treg cells
CD39, CD73 ATP, ADP
AMP
Stabilization of FoxP3, prevent eATP- triggered apoptosis, adenosine mediated suppressive function Sun et al., 2010; Schenk et al., 2011; Aswad et al., 2005
Tr1 cells CD39 ATP, ADP Promote Tr1 cell differentiation by eATP depletion, adenosine mediated suppressive function Mascanfroni et al., 2015
Sup Th17 cells CD39, CD73 ATP, ADP
AMP
Adenosine mediated suppressive function Chalmin et al., 2012

With respect to the kinetics of phosphohydrolysis, there is feed forward inhibition of CD73 by ADP; hence CD39 is the rate limiting ectonucleotidase in the blood and extracellular environment (30). CD39 biological activity is substantively compromised by acute inflammatory stress and reactive oxygen species; as in ischemia reperfusion responses (31, 32). The acute inflammatory loss of vascular NTPDase activity is therefore highly pertinent to the delayed evolution of adenosinergic responses, which allows platelet activation to occur and acute inflammatory “danger” responses to proceed, while compartmentalizing inflammatory responses, removing pathogenic organisms.

Transcriptional induction of CD39 and CD73 ectonucleotidases and increased immune cell infiltration at sites of injury results in conversion of a dominant P2-environment to one associated with decreases in the levels of nucleotides and predominant adenosinergic responses. It should be also noted that extracellular nucleotides may further serve as negative modulators of immunity, or as immunosuppressants. Indeed, chronic and repetitive exposure to low extracellular nucleotide levels tends to suppress immunity and inflammation (33).

In the following sections, we will discuss the different roles played by CD39 and these kinetic fluxes in nucleotides and pathways of adenosine generation in the regulation of the T-cell response (Fig. 2).

Figure 2. Effects of eATP on the polarization of CD4+ T cells.

Figure 2

eATP (and hypoxia) activate HIF-1α in T cells, leading to the ubiquitination and degradation of FoxP3 and AHR, and the suppression of FoxP3 Treg and Tr1 cell differentiation. Conversely, HIF-1α stabilizes Rorc and the metabolic program of Th17 cells.

Effects of eATP and CD39 on T cells

eATP boosts T-cell activation

Following the engagement of the T-cell receptor (TCR), pannexin 1 channels localize to the immune synapse together with P2X receptors, resulting in the release of ATP that activates the P2X receptors, triggers calcium influx and boost cell activation (9). Thus, eATP released during T-cell activation acts in an autocrine manner to amplify TCR-triggered activation and enhance IL-2 production (9, 34). In addition, the eATP released during T-cell activation can also act as a paracrine messenger, inducing a P2rX4/P2rX7-dependent influx of calcium in neighboring lymphocytes that results in the reduction of T-cell motility in the lymph node and favors interactions between T cells and antigen presenting cells (35).

It has to be noted, however, that the P2rX7-dependent effects of eATP on T cells are concentration-dependent: low eATP concentrations trigger P2X receptor responses (around 250 nM), while high eATP concentrations (1mM) and prolonged P2rX7 stimulation induce pore formation and apoptosis (36, 37).

CD39 stabilizes FoxP3+ Tregs and contributes to their suppressive function

Specialized T-cell populations limit the activity of self-reactive elements in the immune system to prevent the development of immune pathology. One of these populations is constituted by CD4+ regulatory T cells, further characterized by the expression of the transcription factor FoxP3 (FoxP3+ Tregs). Several mechanisms have been described to mediate the immunoregulatory effects of FoxP3+ Tregs, among them are the expression of surface molecules such as Lag-3 and CTLA4, and the production of immunosuppressive cytokines such as IL-10 and TGF-β (3840).

CD39 and eATP, however, also play a significant role in the suppressive function and stability of FoxP3+ Tregs. CD39 and CD73 are co-expressed on the surface of human and murine regulatory FoxP3+ Tregs (41, 42). In cooperation with CD73, CD39 contributes to FoxP3+ Treg suppressive activity by promoting the generation of adenosine, which acts directly on T cells to modulate their activation through signaling cascades controlled by the A2A adenosine receptor (41, 42). In addition, adenosine-triggered increments in cAMP intracellular levels may result in the transactivation of the Entpd1 promoter, increasing CD39 expression by FoxP3+ Tregs (43).

CD39 also contributes to FoxP3+ Treg stability. eATP signaling through P2rX7 and pErk interferes with both the differentiation and suppressive function of FoxP3+ Tregs (44). Interestingly, the decrease in the differentiation and suppressive function of FoxP3+ Tregs triggered by eATP is linked to decreased FoxP3 expression and stability. Considering that FoxP3 is needed not only to initiate, but also to maintain the transcriptional program of FoxP3+ Tregs, direct effects of eATP on FoxP3 stability are likely to mediate these effects through different mechanisms.

The transcription factor HIF-1α has been shown to interfere with FoxP3+ Treg differentiation by triggering FoxP3 ubiquitination and degradation (45). HIF-1α mediates the cellular response to hypoxia (46, 47), however additional stimuli can also result in the activation of HIF-1α dependent responses. eATP is reported to induce the expression of HIF-1α responsive genes through a P2rX7-dependent pathway (48, 49). Hence, the suppressive effects of eATP on FoxP3+ Tregs likely involve the HIF-1α dependent ubiquitination and degradation of Foxp3. In this context, CD39 expression may stabilize FoxP3+ Tregs through its ability to deplete eATP and limit HIF-1α activation. Moreover, the stabilization of FoxP3+ Tregs by CD39 would be particularly advantageous in the microenvironment of inflammatory sites, which are characterized by high levels of eATP (2, 27). In support of this hypothesis, recent genetic analyses support the control of the peripheral FoxP3+ Tregs pool in humans by CD39 (50). Hypoxia and adenosine may also affect CD39 expression through additional mechanisms (43, 51). Collectively, these data show that CD39 contributes to FoxP3+ Treg dependent immune modulation through the synthesis of adenosine in cooperation with CD73, the stabilization of FoxP3 and the arrest of eATP-triggered T-cell apoptosis to which FoxP3+ Tregs show increased sensitivity (52).

CD39 boost Tr1 cell differentiation and function

Type 1 regulatory T (Tr1) cells are characterized by the production of IL-10 and the lack of FoxP3 expression, initially described by Roncarolo and co-workers (53). Tr1 cells have non-redundant roles in limiting inflammation, enforcing immune tolerance in diverse contexts ranging from HLA-mismatched fetal liver hematopoietic stem cell transplants to autoimmune diabetes (5456). Indeed, Tr1 cell deficits have been described in autoimmune diseases such as multiple sclerosis (MS) (57). IL-27 is a potent inducer of Tr1 cell differentiation (5860). Indeed, we found that IL-27 promotes Tr1 cell differentiation through signaling pathways mediated by AHR and other molecules (6164).

We recently found that AHR in combination with STAT3 promotes the expression of CD39 in IL-27 induced Tr1 cells (65) (Fig. 3). Similarly to what has been shown for FoxP3+ Tregs, CD39 contributes to both, Tr1 cell differentiation and function. CD39 contributes to the suppressive function of Tr1 cells in vivo and in vitro. However, Tr1 cells induced with IL-27 do not express CD73. Accordingly, the CD39-dependent suppressive activity of Tr1 cells requires the synthesis of adenosine in cooperation with CD73 expressed by effector T cells and DCs. This observation suggests that the cooperative generation of adenosine by CD39 in Tr1 cells and CD73 in other immune cells may limit adenosine production, minimizing fibrosis and other side effects of chronic adenosinergic signaling (66).

Figure 3. CD39 promotes the differentiation of Tr1 cells.

Figure 3

During Tr1 cell differentiation, IL-27 triggered STAT3 activation promotes the expression of the transcription factors c-Maf and AHR, which transactivate the Il10 and Il21 promoters. AHR and HIF-1α associate with ARNT to control the expression of their target genes eATP activates HIF-1α signaling via P2rX7, displacing ARNT from its interaction with AHR, promoting AHR ubiquitination and degradation and effectively suppressing AHR-dependent signaling. CD39 limits eATP-induced HIF-1α signaling to promote Tr1 cell differentiation.

CD39 also boosts the differentiation of Tr1 cells. Indeed, CD39 deficiency results in decreased Tr1 cell differentiation in response to IL-27. As we already mentioned, AHR plays a central role in the transcriptional programs that drive Tr1 cell differentiation in response to IL-27 (6365, 67). AHR and HIF-1α associate with ARNT to control the expression of their target genes (46, 68). In the absence of CD39, increased eATP levels result in HIF-1α activation. This in turn displaces AHR from its interaction with ARNT and promotes AHR ubiquitination and degradation suppressing AHR-dependent signaling (65). Therefore, CD39 promotes Tr1 cell differentiation by decreasing eATP levels, limiting P2rX7-dependent purinergic signaling.

AHR directly promotes CD39 expression in Tr1 cells. Thus, it is tempting to speculate that molecules that increase AHR expression or activity, such as melatonin (62) or AhR agonists (68) might be exploited to increase CD39 expression in Tr1 cells and consequently, the suppressive function and stability. Together with specific P2rX7 inhibitors (69), these molecules might offer new avenues for the development of Tr1 cell-based immunotherapies.

CD39 expression endows effector T cells with suppressive activity

Th17 cell subpopulations that differ in their pathogenicity are differentiated based on the expression of specific transcriptional programs and effector molecules (7073). GM-CSF, for example, is expressed by pathogenic Th17 cells (74, 75). Conversely, the production of IL-10 has been linked to non pathogenic Th17 cells that might be endowed with suppressive activity (71, 72). Non-pathogenic Th17 cells generated with IL-6 and TGF-β also express CD39 and CD73 (76), and have also been identified in humans (77). Indeed, CD39 is reported to mediate the suppressive activity of non-pathogenic Th17 cells, interfering for example with tumor-specific immunity through an adenosine-dependent mechanism.

During chronic immune responses to tumors or infections effector T cells gradually lose effector functions while they acquire the expression of multiple inhibitory molecules. Exhausted T cells might even gain the ability to actively suppress other effector T cells (78). This process has been named T-cell exhaustion, but the molecular mechanisms that control it are not completely understood. It has been recently reported that CD39 expression is associated with the exhausted immune cell phenotype in cancer and chronic infection (79). It is not clear yet whether CD73 expression is also a common feature shared by the exhausted T cells induced in different physiologic scenarios. However, collectively these findings suggest that the expression of CD39 may endow effector T cells with regulatory functions.

Subpopulations of long-lived T memory-type cells also express CD39, which may well impact cellular metabolic profiles and promote survival. The mechanisms that control the longevity of immune cells and mediates their resistance to cell death under conditions of stress or activation-induced cell death (AICD) remain unclear. Work in mammalian cell systems, insects, worms and yeast suggest that insulin/IGF signaling, AMP-kinase (AMPK)-FOXO transcription factors and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) all regulate stress resistance and organism longevity (80). Interestingly, eATP/CD39 can modulate mTOR activation (49), and it is entirely feasible that regulation of purinergic signaling will affect T-cell survival.

These observations suggest that specific mechanisms operate to modulate purinergic responses in memory T cells. The response of memory T cells to adenosine and specific receptor agonists might be modulated at the level of intracellular cyclic-AMP and the signaling pathways it controls. Hence, any potential resistance of T memory or other immune cells to the effects of adenosinergic signaling could be associated with the upregulation of immune cell phosphodiestases (PDE) (81).

In addition, it is also feasible that following prior exposure to adenosine, PKA-mediated desensitization changes responses triggered by A2A or other receptors. G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) are also thought to be important in mediating the agonist-induced phosphorylation and consequent desensitization of purinergic responses. It is also possible that a differentially spliced A2A receptor is expressed, preferentially internalized or shed in long-lived T cells. The native A2A receptor has a long C-terminus (of >120 residues), which clearly binds to adenylate cyclase (AC) but was originally viewed as the docking site for kinases and the beta-arrestin family to initiate receptor desensitization and endocytosis. Hence, the truncation of A2A C-terminus as a result of alternative splicing (82, 83), would preclude AC-dependent cAMP responses while maintaining signaling via MAP kinases. Alternatively, proteins known interact with the C-terminus of A2A such as alpha-actinin, ARNO, USP4 and translin-associated protein-X could displace AC and therefore abrogate A2A-triggered cAMP-dependent signaling (8488).

Our published and newer data clearly indicate that CD39 and changes in the nucleotide/nucleoside balance impact insulin-sensitivity, block mTOR activation (ATP-dependent) while boosting AMPK functions (adenosine-dependent process) (49). Although CD39 appears to be associated with enhanced T-cell survival, much as rapamycin and metformin have been shown to do, additional effects of CD39 include protection from P2X7-mediated apoptosis and the provision of nucleosides that activate A2A receptors, obviating AICD, promoting intracellular anabolism as well as purine salvage pathways.

Based on the effects of purinergic signaling on T cell memory and exhaustion, these findings suggest that CD39 targeting strategies might provide a new generation of checkpoint targeting modalities for the treatment of cancer and chronic infections (89, 90). In this context, CD39 inhibition is likely to be more effective than only targeting CD73 (91), because of its effects not only in arresting the generation of immunosuppressive adenosine, but also in promoting the accumulation of immunostimulatory eATP (92), as well as indirectly leading to the feed forward inhibition of CD73 (93).

Effects of eATP and CD39 on DCs

DCs control the activation of T cells in vivo, and their differentiation into specific functional lineages through the production of polarizing cytokines (62, 94). IL-1β and IL-18, for example, promote the differentiation of Th17 and Th1 cells, respectively. In agreement with their important roles in shaping the immune response, the production of the biologically active forms of these cytokines is a highly regulated process. First, inactive proIL-1β and proIL-18 are generated in response to TLR agonists or TNFα. A second stimulus such as uric acid crystals, amyloid-β or eATP is then needed to trigger the proteolytic activation of proIL-1β and proIL-18 through a process controlled by the inflammasome (9598).

The NLRP3 inflammasome catalyzes the production of active IL-1β and IL-18 in response to a collection of structurally different signals (97). On such signal is eATP, which activates the NLRP3 inflammasome in DCs through a mechanism mediated by P2rX7 (2, 99).

The importance of the NLRP3 inflammasome in the T-cell response is highlighted by the decrease in contact hypersensitivity (100) and Th1 and Th17 responses (101, 102) observed in NLPR3-deficient mice. Indeed, NLRP3 inflammasome activation is required for the development of autoimmune CNS inflammation (99, 103). Based on the activation of NLRP3 by eATP, CD39 is likely to modulate the production of polarizing cytokines by DCs and, indirectly, the T-cell response.

Initial support for a role of CD39 in the control of T-cell immunity by NLRP3 was provided by the observation of augmented contact hypersensitivity in CD39-deficient mice (104). More recent support for the role of CD39 expressed in DCs in the control of the NLRP3 inflammasome and T-cell responses was provided by our studies on tolerogenic DCs induced with IL-27 (99) (Fig. 4).

Figure 4. CD39 limits NLRP3 inflammasome activation in DCs.

Figure 4

eATP activates the NRLP3 inflammasome in DCs via P2rX7 signaling. IL-27 acts on DCs to induce CD39 expression through a STAT3-dependent mechanism. CD39 in DCs limits inflammation by limiting eATP-driven NLRP3 activation.

We reported that IL-27 signaling in DCs limits the differentiation of effector T cells and the development of EAE, while expanding FoxP3+ Tregs and Tr1 cells. In detailed transcriptional and epigenetic analyses we found that IL-27 promotes CD39 expression in DCs in vivo and in vitro through a mechanism mediated by STAT3. Further studies determined that CD39 in DCs limits the differentiation of Th1 and Th17 cells by depleting eATP, consequently reducing P2rX7-dependent NLRP3 activation and the production of IL-1β and IL-18(99).

STAT3 deficiency restricted to DCs results in the spontaneous development of inflammation (105). These data suggest that other cytokines that activate STAT3 signaling and induce a tolerogenic phenotype in DCs such as IL-10 and IL-21 (106, 107) may trigger CD39-dependent regulatory pathways similar to those triggered by IL-27. In addition, STAT3 signaling is known to control the activity of microglia and macrophages; these cells also express CD39 (108110). Thus, it is possible that the induction of CD39 expression constitutes a common immunoregulatory mechanism triggered by STAT3-activating cytokines in cells of the innate immune system.

Of note, eATP signaling through the P2Y11 receptor in DCs inhibits LPS-induced IL-12p70 production while it increases the expression of anti-inflammatory IL-10 (111). Purinergic signaling in DCs also induce apoptosis, limiting immune responses (112). Thus, the net effects of CD39 on the regulation of DC function are likely dictated by multiple factors, including the balance in the P2X and P2Y expression by specific DC populations and local concentrations of eATP, ADP and other nucleotides.

Concluding remarks and future perspectives

The anti-inflammatory and modulatory effects of CD39 impact the T-cell response at multiple levels, promoting the differentiation, function and stability of effector and regulatory T cells. These effects result from the scavenging of eATP and the arrest of the modulation of T-cell activation and differentiation by P2R-dependent signaling. Hence, since eATP levels are high at sites of inflammation, CD39 expression provides a competitive advantage for T-cell dependent immunoregulation in the microenvironment of inflamed tissues.

Interestingly, IL-27 up-regulates CD39 expression in Tr1 cells and DCs through a mechanism mediated by STAT3 and AHR. It is likely that this anti-inflammatory transcriptional program is co-opted by other immune cells responsive to IL-27, such as FoxP3+ Tregs (113, 114) and effector T cells (60, 115, 116). Indeed, other STAT3-activating cytokines such as IL-10 may also promote CD39 expression. Therefore, CD39 expression and the modulation of purinergic signaling might provide a common mechanism of action for the anti-inflammatory effects of IL-27, IL-10 and other STAT3-activating cytokines.

Finally, the immunomodulatory effects of CD39 offer unique opportunities for therapeutic immunomodulation. The administration of exogenous CD39, either as a recombinant protein, purified protein or in nanoparticles might provide a new approach to limit inflammation. This therapeutic approach is likely to be more efficient than existing strategies aimed at blocking P2X (69) or other receptors because of the ability not only to limit eATP signaling, but also to promote the generation of anti-inflammatory adenosine. Conversely, based on the expression of CD39 by exhausted T cells, the blockade of CD39 with small molecules or specific biological reagents such as monoclonal antibodies might provide a new approach to unleash protective immune responses in the context of chronic infections or tumor immunotherapy.

In summary, CD39 plays a significant role in the regulation of the T-cell response in the context of autoimmunity, infections and cancer. The further identification of the mechanisms by which CD39 controls the immune response will provide unique insights into the workings of the immune system in health and disease, and lead to the development of new and efficacious immunotherapeutic approaches.

Trends box.

  • CD39 regulates T-cell activation, polarization and stability by scavenging immunostimulatory extracellular adenosine triphosphate (eATP) and promoting the generation of immunosuppressive adenosine.

  • CD39 impacts T-cell response by acting directly on T cells, and also indirectly by modulating the activity of antigen presenting cells.

  • The regulation of CD39 expression by cytokines and other immunological stimuli modulates the immune response in the context of inflammation, infections and cancer.

  • CD39-targeted approaches offer new avenues for the therapeutic modulation of the immune response in autoimmunity, infections and cancer.

Acknowledgments

We apologize to the many authors whose excellent work we could not cite owing to space limitations.

Footnotes

Conflict of interest

The authors state no conflict of interest.

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Eltzschig HK, Sitkovsky MV, Robson SC. Purinergic signaling during inflammation. The New England journal of medicine. 2012;367:2322–2333. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1205750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Junger WG. Immune cell regulation by autocrine purinergic signalling. Nature reviews Immunology. 2011;11:201–212. doi: 10.1038/nri2938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Robson SC, Sevigny J, Zimmermann H. The E-NTPDase family of ectonucleotidases: Structure function relationships and pathophysiological significance. Purinergic Signal. 2006;2:409–430. doi: 10.1007/s11302-006-9003-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Horenstein AL, Chillemi A, Zaccarello G, Bruzzone S, Quarona V, Zito A, Serra S, Malavasi F. A CD38/CD203a/CD73 ectoenzymatic pathway independent of CD39 drives a novel adenosinergic loop in human T lymphocytes. Oncoimmunology. 2013;2:e26246. doi: 10.4161/onci.26246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Trautmann A. Extracellular ATP in the immune system: more than just a "danger signal". Science signaling. 2009;2:pe6. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.256pe6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Burnstock G, Boeynaems JM. Purinergic signalling and immune cells. Purinergic Signal. 2014;10:529–564. doi: 10.1007/s11302-014-9427-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Filippini A, Taffs RE, Sitkovsky MV. Extracellular ATP in T-lymphocyte activation: possible role in effector functions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1990;87:8267–8271. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.21.8267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ledderose C, Bao Y, Ledderose S, Woehrle T, Heinisch M, Yip L, Zhang J, Robson SC, Shapiro NI, Junger WG. Mitochondrial Dysfunction, Depleted Purinergic Signaling, and Defective T Cell Vigilance and Immune Defense. The Journal of infectious diseases. 2016;213:456–464. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiv373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Schenk U, Westendorf AM, Radaelli E, Casati A, Ferro M, Fumagalli M, Verderio C, Buer J, Scanziani E, Grassi F. Purinergic control of T cell activation by ATP released through pannexin-1 hemichannels. Science signaling. 2008;1:ra6. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.1160583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Woehrle T, Yip L, Elkhal A, Sumi Y, Chen Y, Yao Y, Insel PA, Junger WG. Pannexin-1 hemichannel-mediated ATP release together with P2X1 and P2X4 receptors regulate T-cell activation at the immune synapse. Blood. 2010;116:3475–3484. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-04-277707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Chekeni FB, Elliott MR, Sandilos JK, Walk SF, Kinchen JM, Lazarowski ER, Armstrong AJ, Penuela S, Laird DW, Salvesen GS, Isakson BE, Bayliss DA, Ravichandran KS. Pannexin 1 channels mediate 'find-me' signal release and membrane permeability during apoptosis. Nature. 2010;467:863–867. doi: 10.1038/nature09413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Qu Y, Misaghi S, Newton K, Gilmour LL, Louie S, Cupp JE, Dubyak GR, Hackos D, Dixit VM. Pannexin-1 is required for ATP release during apoptosis but not for inflammasome activation. Journal of immunology. 2011;186:6553–6561. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1100478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Cotrina ML, Lin JH, Alves-Rodrigues A, Liu S, Li J, Azmi-Ghadimi H, Kang J, Naus CC, Nedergaard M. Connexins regulate calcium signaling by controlling ATP release. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1998;95:15735–15740. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.26.15735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Eltzschig HK, Eckle T, Mager A, Kuper N, Karcher C, Weissmuller T, Boengler K, Schulz R, Robson SC, Colgan SP. ATP release from activated neutrophils occurs via connexin 43 and modulates adenosine-dependent endothelial cell function. Circulation research. 2006;99:1100–1108. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000250174.31269.70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Pearson RA, Dale N, Llaudet E, Mobbs P. ATP released via gap junction hemichannels from the pigment epithelium regulates neural retinal progenitor proliferation. Neuron. 2005;46:731–744. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.04.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Schena F, Volpi S, Faliti CE, Penco F, Santi S, Proietti M, Schenk U, Damonte G, Salis A, Bellotti M, Fais F, Tenca C, Gattorno M, Eibel H, Rizzi M, Warnatz K, Idzko M, Ayata CK, Rakhmanov M, Galli T, Martini A, Canossa M, Grassi F, Traggiai E. Dependence of immunoglobulin class switch recombination in B cells on vesicular release of ATP and CD73 ectonucleotidase activity. Cell Rep. 2013;3:1824–1831. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.05.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Atarashi K, Honda K. Microbiota in autoimmunity and tolerance. Current opinion in immunology. 2011;23:761–768. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2011.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Belkaid Y, Hand TW. Role of the microbiota in immunity and inflammation. Cell. 2014;157:121–141. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.03.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Garrett WS. Cancer and the microbiota. Science. 2015;348:80–86. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa4972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Inoue Y, Shimojo N. Microbiome/microbiota and allergies. Seminars in immunopathology. 2015;37:57–64. doi: 10.1007/s00281-014-0453-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Li Y, Innocentin S, Withers DR, Roberts NA, Gallagher AR, Grigorieva EF, Wilhelm C, Veldhoen M. Exogenous stimuli maintain intraepithelial lymphocytes via aryl hydrocarbon receptor activation. Cell. 2011;147:629–640. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.09.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Smith PM, Howitt MR, Panikov N, Michaud M, Gallini CA, Bohlooly YM, Glickman JN, Garrett WS. The microbial metabolites, short-chain fatty acids, regulate colonic Treg cell homeostasis. Science. 2013;341:569–573. doi: 10.1126/science.1241165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Zelante T, Iannitti RG, Cunha C, De Luca A, Giovannini G, Pieraccini G, Zecchi R, D'Angelo C, Massi-Benedetti C, Fallarino F, Carvalho A, Puccetti P, Romani L. Tryptophan catabolites from microbiota engage aryl hydrocarbon receptor and balance mucosal reactivity via interleukin-22. Immunity. 2013;39:372–385. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Atarashi K, Nishimura J, Shima T, Umesaki Y, Yamamoto M, Onoue M, Yagita H, Ishii N, Evans R, Honda K, Takeda K. ATP drives lamina propria T(H)17 cell differentiation. Nature. 2008;455:808–812. doi: 10.1038/nature07240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Sansom FM, Robson SC, Hartland EL. Possible effects of microbial ecto-nucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolases on host-pathogen interactions. Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR. 2008;72:765–781. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00013-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Wang Y, Telesford KM, Ochoa-Reparaz J, Haque-Begum S, Christy M, Kasper EJ, Wang L, Wu Y, Robson SC, Kasper DL, Kasper LH. An intestinal commensal symbiosis factor controls neuroinflammation via TLR2-mediated CD39 signalling. Nature communications. 2014;5:4432. doi: 10.1038/ncomms5432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Idzko M, Ferrari D, Eltzschig HK. Nucleotide signalling during inflammation. Nature. 2014;509:310–317. doi: 10.1038/nature13085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Bono MR, Fernandez D, Flores-Santibanez F, Rosemblatt M, Sauma D. CD73 and CD39 ectonucleotidases in T cell differentiation: Beyond immunosuppression. FEBS letters. 2015;589:3454–3460. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2015.07.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Sevigny J, Sundberg C, Braun N, Guckelberger O, Csizmadia E, Qawi I, Imai M, Zimmermann H, Robson SC. Differential catalytic properties and vascular topography of murine nucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolase 1 (NTPDase1) and NTPDase2 have implications for thromboregulation. Blood. 2002;99:2801–2809. doi: 10.1182/blood.v99.8.2801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Gordon EL, Pearson JD, Slakey LL. The hydrolysis of extracellular adenine nucleotides by cultured endothelial cells from pig aorta. Feed-forward inhibition of adenosine production at the cell surface. The Journal of biological chemistry. 1986;261:15496–15507. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Candinas D, Koyamada N, Miyatake T, Siegel J, Hancock WW, Bach FH, Robson SC. Loss of rat glomerular ATP diphosphohydrolase activity during reperfusion injury is associated with oxidative stress reactions. Thrombosis and haemostasis. 1996;76:807–812. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Robson SC, Kaczmarek E, Siegel JB, Candinas D, Koziak K, Millan M, Hancock WW, Bach FH. Loss of ATP diphosphohydrolase activity with endothelial cell activation. J Exp Med. 1997;185:153–163. doi: 10.1084/jem.185.1.153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Di Virgilio F, Boeynaems JM, Robson SC. Extracellular nucleotides as negative modulators of immunity. Current opinion in pharmacology. 2009;9:507–513. doi: 10.1016/j.coph.2009.06.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Yip L, Woehrle T, Corriden R, Hirsh M, Chen Y, Inoue Y, Ferrari V, Insel PA, Junger WG. Autocrine regulation of T-cell activation by ATP release and P2X7 receptors. FASEB J. 2009;23:1685–1693. doi: 10.1096/fj.08-126458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Wang CM, Ploia C, Anselmi F, Sarukhan A, Viola A. Adenosine triphosphate acts as a paracrine signaling molecule to reduce the motility of T cells. EMBO J. 2014;33:1354–1364. doi: 10.15252/embj.201386666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Trabanelli S, Ocadlíková D, Gulinelli S, Curti A, Salvestrini V, Vieira RP, Idzko M, Di Virgilio F, Ferrari D, Lemoli RM. Extracellular ATP exerts opposite effects on activated and regulatory CD4+ T cells via purinergic P2 receptor activation. Journal of immunology. 2012;189:1303–1310. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1103800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Tsukimoto M, Maehata M, Harada H, Ikari A, Takagi K, Degawa M. P2X7 receptor-dependent cell death is modulated during murine T cell maturation and mediated by dual signaling pathways. Journal of immunology. 2006;177:2842–2850. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.177.5.2842. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Josefowicz SZ, Lu LF, Rudensky AY. Regulatory T cells: mechanisms of differentiation and function. Annual review of immunology. 2012;30:531–564. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.25.022106.141623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Shevach EM. Mechanisms of foxp3+ T regulatory cell-mediated suppression. Immunity. 2009;30:636–645. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2009.04.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Wing K, Yamaguchi T, Sakaguchi S. Cell-autonomous and -non-autonomous roles of CTLA-4 in immune regulation. Trends in immunology. 2011;32:428–433. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2011.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Borsellino G, Kleinewietfeld M, Di Mitri D, Sternjak A, Diamantini A, Giometto R, Hopner S, Centonze D, Bernardi G, Dell'Acqua ML, Rossini PM, Battistini L, Rotzschke O, Falk K. Expression of ectonucleotidase CD39 by Foxp3+ Treg cells: hydrolysis of extracellular ATP and immune suppression. Blood. 2007;110:1225–1232. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-12-064527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Deaglio S, Dwyer KM, Gao W, Friedman D, Usheva A, Erat A, Chen JF, Enjyoji K, Linden J, Oukka M, Kuchroo VK, Strom TB, Robson SC. Adenosine generation catalyzed by CD39 and CD73 expressed on regulatory T cells mediates immune suppression. J Exp Med. 2007;204:1257–1265. doi: 10.1084/jem.20062512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Liao H, Hyman MC, Baek AE, Fukase K, Pinsky DJ. cAMP/CREB-mediated transcriptional regulation of ectonucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolase 1 (CD39) expression. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2010;285:14791–14805. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.116905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Schenk U, Frascoli M, Proietti M, Geffers R, Traggiai E, Buer J, Ricordi C, Westendorf AM, Grassi F. ATP inhibits the generation and function of regulatory T cells through the activation of purinergic P2X receptors. Science signaling. 2011;4:ra12. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2001270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Dang EV, Barbi J, Yang HY, Jinasena D, Yu H, Zheng Y, Bordman Z, Fu J, Kim Y, Yen HR, Luo W, Zeller K, Shimoda L, Topalian SL, Semenza GL, Dang CV, Pardoll DM, Pan F. Control of T(H)17/T(reg) balance by hypoxia-inducible factor 1. Cell. 2011;146:772–784. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.07.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Semenza GL. Hypoxia-inducible factors in physiology and medicine. Cell. 2012;148:399–408. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.01.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Semenza GL. Oxygen sensing, hypoxia-inducible factors, and disease pathophysiology. Annual review of pathology. 2014;9:47–71. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pathol-012513-104720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Amoroso F, Falzoni S, Adinolfi E, Ferrari D, Di Virgilio F. The P2X7 receptor is a key modulator of aerobic glycolysis. Cell death & disease. 2012;3:e370. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2012.105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Sun X, Han L, Seth P, Bian S, Li L, Csizmadia E, Junger WG, Schmelzle M, Usheva A, Tapper EB, Baffy G, Sukhatme VP, Wu Y, Robson SC. Disordered purinergic signaling and abnormal cellular metabolism are associated with development of liver cancer in Cd39/ENTPD1 null mice. Hepatology. 2013;57:205–216. doi: 10.1002/hep.25989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Roederer M, Quaye L, Mangino M, Beddall MH, Mahnke Y, Chattopadhyay P, Tosi I, Napolitano L, Terranova Barberio M, Menni C, Villanova F, Di Meglio P, Spector TD, Nestle FO. The genetic architecture of the human immune system: a bioresource for autoimmunity and disease pathogenesis. Cell. 2015;161:387–403. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.02.046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Hatfield SM, Kjaergaard J, Lukashev D, Belikoff B, Schreiber TH, Sethumadhavan S, Abbott R, Philbrook P, Thayer M, Shujia D, Rodig S, Kutok JL, Ren J, Ohta A, Podack ER, Karger B, Jackson EK, Sitkovsky M. Systemic oxygenation weakens the hypoxia and hypoxia inducible factor 1alpha-dependent and extracellular adenosine-mediated tumor protection. Journal of molecular medicine. 2014;92:1283–1292. doi: 10.1007/s00109-014-1189-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Aswad F, Kawamura H, Dennert G. High sensitivity of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells to extracellular metabolites nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide and ATP: a role for P2X7 receptors. Journal of immunology. 2005;175:3075–3083. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.175.5.3075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Groux H, O'Garra A, Bigler M, Rouleau M, Antonenko S, de Vries JE, Roncarolo MG. A CD4+ T-cell subset inhibits antigen- specific T-cell responses and prevents colitis. Nature. 1997;389:737–742. doi: 10.1038/39614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Clayton A, Al-Taei S, Webber J, Mason MD, Tabi Z. Cancer exosomes express CD39 and CD73, which suppress T cells through adenosine production. Journal of immunology. 2011;187:676–683. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1003884. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Roncarolo MG, Gregori S, Battaglia M, Bacchetta R, Fleischhauer K, Levings MK. Interleukin-10-secreting type 1 regulatory T cells in rodents and humans. Immunol Rev. 2006;212:28–50. doi: 10.1111/j.0105-2896.2006.00420.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Roncarolo MG, Gregori S, Bacchetta R, Battaglia M. Tr1 cells and the counter-regulation of immunity: natural mechanisms and therapeutic applications. Current topics in microbiology and immunology. 2014;380:39–68. doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-43492-5_3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Astier AL, Hafler DA. Abnormal Tr1 differentiation in multiple sclerosis. Journal of neuroimmunology. 2007;191:70–78. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2007.09.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Awasthi A, Carrier Y, Peron JP, Bettelli E, Kamanaka M, Flavell RA, Kuchroo VK, Oukka M, Weiner HL. A dominant function for interleukin 27 in generating interleukin 10-producing anti-inflammatory T cells. Nature immunology. 2007;8:1380–1389. doi: 10.1038/ni1541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Stumhofer JS, Silver JS, Laurence A, Porrett PM, Harris TH, Turka LA, Ernst M, Saris CJ, O'Shea JJ, Hunter CA. Interleukins 27 and 6 induce STAT3-mediated T cell production of interleukin 10. Nature immunology. 2007;8:1363–1371. doi: 10.1038/ni1537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Fitzgerald DC, Zhang GX, El-Behi M, Fonseca-Kelly Z, Li H, Yu S, Saris CJ, Gran B, Ciric B, Rostami A. Suppression of autoimmune inflammation of the central nervous system by interleukin 10 secreted by interleukin 27-stimulated T cells. Nature immunology. 2007;8:1372–1379. doi: 10.1038/ni1540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Apetoh L, Quintana FJ, Pot C, Joller N, Xiao S, Kumar D, Burns EJ, Sherr DH, Weiner HL, Kuchroo VK. The aryl hydrocarbon receptor interacts with c-Maf to promote the differentiation of type 1 regulatory T cells induced by IL-27. Nature immunology. 2010;11:854–861. doi: 10.1038/ni.1912. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Farez MF, Mascanfroni ID, Mendez-Huergo SP, Yeste A, Murugaiyan G, Garo LP, Balbuena Aguirre ME, Patel B, Ysrraelit MC, Zhu C, Kuchroo VK, Rabinovich GA, Quintana FJ, Correale J. Melatonin Contributes to the Seasonality of Multiple Sclerosis Relapses. Cell. 2015;162:1338–1352. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.08.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Gandhi R, Kumar D, Burns EJ, Nadeau M, Dake B, Laroni A, Kozoriz D, Weiner HL, Quintana FJ. Activation of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor induces human type 1 regulatory T cell-like and Foxp3(+) regulatory T cells. Nature immunology. 2010;11:846–853. doi: 10.1038/ni.1915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Wu HY, Quintana FJ, da Cunha AP, Dake BT, Koeglsperger T, Starossom SC, Weiner HL. In Vivo Induction of Tr1 Cells via Mucosal Dendritic Cells and AHR Signaling. PLoS One. 2011;6:e23618. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Mascanfroni ID, Takenaka MC, Yeste A, Patel B, Wu Y, Kenison JE, Siddiqui S, Basso AS, Otterbein LE, Pardoll DM, Pan F, Priel A, Clish CB, Robson SC, Quintana FJ. Metabolic control of type 1 regulatory T cell differentiation by AHR and HIF1- alpha. Nat Med. 2015;21:638–646. doi: 10.1038/nm.3868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Vaughn BP, Robson SC, Longhi MS. Purinergic signaling in liver disease. Digestive diseases. 2014;32:516–524. doi: 10.1159/000360498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Apetoh L, Quintana FJ, Pot C, Joller N, Xiao S, Kumar D, Burns EJ, Sherr DH, Weiner HL, Kuchroo VK. The aryl hydrocarbon receptor interacts with c-Maf to promote the differentiation of type 1 regulatory T cells induced by IL–27. Nature immunology. 2010;11:854–861. doi: 10.1038/ni.1912. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Quintana FJ, Sherr DH. Aryl hydrocarbon receptor control of adaptive immunity. Pharmacological reviews. 2013;65:1148–1161. doi: 10.1124/pr.113.007823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Subramanyam C, Duplantier AJ, Dombroski MA, Chang SP, Gabel CA, Whitney-Pickett C, Perregaux DG, Labasi JM, Yoon K, Shepard RM, Fisher M. Discovery, synthesis and SAR of azinyl- and azolylbenzamides antagonists of the P2X(7) receptor. Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters. 2011;21:5475–5479. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2011.06.117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Gaublomme JT, Yosef N, Lee Y, Gertner RS, Yang LV, Wu C, Pandolfi PP, Mak T, Satija R, Shalek AK, Kuchroo VK, Park H, Regev A. Single-Cell Genomics Unveils Critical Regulators of Th17 Cell Pathogenicity. Cell. 2015;163:1400–1412. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.11.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Lee Y, Awasthi A, Yosef N, Quintana FJ, Xiao S, Peters A, Wu C, Kleinewietfeld M, Kunder S, Hafler DA, Sobel RA, Regev A, Kuchroo VK. Induction and molecular signature of pathogenic TH17 cells. Nature immunology. 2012;13:991–999. doi: 10.1038/ni.2416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.McGeachy MJ, Bak-Jensen KS, Chen Y, Tato CM, Blumenschein W, McClanahan T, Cua DJ. TGF-beta and IL-6 drive the production of IL-17 and IL-10 by T cells and restrain T(H)-17 cell-mediated pathology. Nature immunology. 2007;8:1390–1397. doi: 10.1038/ni1539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Wang C, Yosef N, Gaublomme J, Wu C, Lee Y, Clish CB, Kaminski J, Xiao S, Meyer Zu Horste G, Pawlak M, Kishi Y, Joller N, Karwacz K, Zhu C, Ordovas-Montanes M, Madi A, Wortman I, Miyazaki T, Sobel RA, Park H, Regev A, Kuchroo VK. CD5L/AIM Regulates Lipid Biosynthesis and Restrains Th17 Cell Pathogenicity. Cell. 2015;163:1413–1427. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.10.068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Codarri L, Gyulveszi G, Tosevski V, Hesske L, Fontana A, Magnenat L, Suter T, Becher B. RORgammat drives production of the cytokine GM-CSF in helper T cells, which is essential for the effector phase of autoimmune neuroinflammation. Nature immunology. 2011;12:560–567. doi: 10.1038/ni.2027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.El-Behi M, Ciric B, Dai H, Yan Y, Cullimore M, Safavi F, Zhang GX, Dittel BN, Rostami A. The encephalitogenicity of T(H)17 cells is dependent on IL-1- and IL-23-induced production of the cytokine GM-CSF. Nature immunology. 2011;12:568–575. doi: 10.1038/ni.2031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Chalmin F, Mignot G, Bruchard M, Chevriaux A, Vegran F, Hichami A, Ladoire S, Derangere V, Vincent J, Masson D, Robson SC, Eberl G, Pallandre JR, Borg C, Ryffel B, Apetoh L, Rebe C, Ghiringhelli F. Stat3 and Gfi-1 transcription factors control Th17 cell immunosuppressive activity via the regulation of ectonucleotidase expression. Immunity. 2012;36:362–373. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2011.12.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Longhi MS, Moss A, Bai A, Wu Y, Huang H, Cheifetz A, Quintana FJ, Robson SC. Characterization of human CD39+ Th17 cells with suppressor activity and modulation in inflammatory bowel disease. PLoS One. 2014;9:e87956. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087956. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Wherry EJ, Kurachi M. Molecular and cellular insights into T cell exhaustion. Nature reviews Immunology. 2015;15:486–499. doi: 10.1038/nri3862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Gupta PK, Godec J, Wolski D, Adland E, Yates K, Pauken KE, Cosgrove C, Ledderose C, Junger WG, Robson SC, Wherry EJ, Alter G, Goulder PJ, Klenerman P, Sharpe AH, Lauer GM, Haining WN. CD39 Expression Identifies Terminally Exhausted CD8+ T Cells. PLoS pathogens. 2015;11:e1005177. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Hindupur SK, Gonzalez A, Hall MN. The opposing actions of target of rapamycin and AMP-activated protein kinase in cell growth control. Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology. 2015;7:a019141. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a019141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Peter D, Jin SL, Conti M, Hatzelmann A, Zitt C. Differential expression and function of phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) subtypes in human primary CD4+ T cells: predominant role of PDE4D. Journal of immunology. 2007;178:4820–4831. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.178.8.4820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Elson G, Eisenberg M, Garg C, Outram S, Ferrante CJ, Hasko G, Leibovich SJ. Induction of murine adenosine A(2A) receptor expression by LPS: analysis of the 5' upstream promoter. Genes and immunity. 2013;14:147–153. doi: 10.1038/gene.2012.60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Kreth S, Ledderose C, Kaufmann I, Groeger G, Thiel M. Differential expression of 5'-UTR splice variants of the adenosine A2A receptor gene in human granulocytes: identification, characterization, and functional impact on activation. Faseb j. 2008;22:3276–3286. doi: 10.1096/fj.07-101097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Burgueno J, Blake DJ, Benson MA, Tinsley CL, Esapa CT, Canela EI, Penela P, Mallol J, Mayor F, Jr, Lluis C, Franco R, Ciruela F. The adenosine A2A receptor interacts with the actin-binding protein alpha-actinin. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2003;278:37545–37552. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M302809200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Gsandtner I, Charalambous C, Stefan E, Ogris E, Freissmuth M, Zezula J. Heterotrimeric G protein-independent signaling of a G protein-coupled receptor. Direct binding of ARNO/cytohesin-2 to the carboxyl terminus of the A2A adenosine receptor is necessary for sustained activation of the ERK/MAP kinase pathway. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2005;280:31898–31905. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M506515200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Keuerleber S, Gsandtner I, Freissmuth M. From cradle to twilight: the carboxyl terminus directs the fate of the A(2A)-adenosine receptor. Biochimica et biophysica acta. 2011;1808:1350–1357. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2010.05.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Milojevic T, Reiterer V, Stefan E, Korkhov VM, Dorostkar MM, Ducza E, Ogris E, Boehm S, Freissmuth M, Nanoff C. The ubiquitin-specific protease Usp4 regulates the cell surface level of the A2A receptor. Molecular pharmacology. 2006;69:1083–1094. doi: 10.1124/mol.105.015818. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Sun CN, Cheng HC, Chou JL, Lee SY, Lin YW, Lai HL, Chen HM, Chern Y. Rescue of p53 blockage by the A(2A) adenosine receptor via a novel interacting protein, translin-associated protein X. Molecular pharmacology. 2006;70:454–466. doi: 10.1124/mol.105.021261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Deaglio S, Robson SC. Ectonucleotidases as regulators of purinergic signaling in thrombosis, inflammation, and immunity. Advances in pharmacology. 2011;61:301–332. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-385526-8.00010-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Sun X, Wu Y, Gao W, Enjyoji K, Csizmadia E, Muller CE, Murakami T, Robson SC. CD39/ENTPD1 expression by CD4+Foxp3+ regulatory T cells promotes hepatic metastatic tumor growth in mice. Gastroenterology. 2010;139:1030–1040. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.05.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Beavis PA, Stagg J, Darcy PK, Smyth MJ. CD73: a potent suppressor of antitumor immune responses. Trends in immunology. 2012;33:231–237. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2012.02.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Martins I, Tesniere A, Kepp O, Michaud M, Schlemmer F, Senovilla L, Seror C, Metivier D, Perfettini JL, Zitvogel L, Kroemer G. Chemotherapy induces ATP release from tumor cells. Cell cycle. 2009;8:3723–3728. doi: 10.4161/cc.8.22.10026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Vieira C, Magalhaes-Cardoso MT, Ferreirinha F, Silva I, Dias AS, Pelletier J, Sevigny J, Correia-de-Sa P. Feed-forward inhibition of CD73 and upregulation of adenosine deaminase contribute to the loss of adenosine neuromodulation in postinflammatory ileitis. Mediators of inflammation. 2014;2014:254640. doi: 10.1155/2014/254640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Ganguly D, Haak S, Sisirak V, Reizis B. The role of dendritic cells in autoimmunity. Nature reviews Immunology. 2013;13:566–577. doi: 10.1038/nri3477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Amit I, Garber M, Chevrier N, Leite AP, Donner Y, Eisenhaure T, Guttman M, Grenier JK, Li W, Zuk O, Schubert LA, Birditt B, Shay T, Goren A, Zhang X, Smith Z, Deering R, McDonald RC, Cabili M, Bernstein BE, Rinn JL, Meissner A, Root DE, Hacohen N, Regev A. Unbiased reconstruction of a mammalian transcriptional network mediating pathogen responses. Science. 2009;326:257–263. doi: 10.1126/science.1179050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Garber M, Yosef N, Goren A, Raychowdhury R, Thielke A, Guttman M, Robinson J, Minie B, Chevrier N, Itzhaki Z, Blecher-Gonen R, Bornstein C, Amann-Zalcenstein D, Weiner A, Friedrich D, Meldrim J, Ram O, Cheng C, Gnirke A, Fisher S, Friedman N, Wong B, Bernstein BE, Nusbaum C, Hacohen N, Regev A, Amit I. A high-throughput chromatin immunoprecipitation approach reveals principles of dynamic gene regulation in mammals. Mol Cell. 2012;47:810–822. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.07.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Mariathasan S, Weiss DS, Newton K, McBride J, O'Rourke K, Roose-Girma M, Lee WP, Weinrauch Y, Monack DM, Dixit VM. Cryopyrin activates the inflammasome in response to toxins and ATP. Nature. 2006;440:228–232. doi: 10.1038/nature04515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Shih VF, Tsui R, Caldwell A, Hoffmann A. A single NFkappaB system for both canonical and non-canonical signaling. Cell research. 2011;21:86–102. doi: 10.1038/cr.2010.161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Mascanfroni ID, Yeste A, Vieira SM, Burns EJ, Patel B, Sloma I, Wu Y, Mayo L, Ben-Hamo R, Efroni S, Kuchroo VK, Robson SC, Quintana FJ. IL-27 acts on DCs to suppress the T cell response and autoimmunity by inducing expression of the immunoregulatory molecule CD39. Nature immunology. 2013;14:1054–1063. doi: 10.1038/ni.2695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Kamanaka M, Kim ST, Wan YY, Sutterwala FS, Lara-Tejero M, Galan JE, Harhaj E, Flavell RA. Expression of interleukin-10 in intestinal lymphocytes detected by an interleukin-10 reporter knockin tiger mouse. Immunity. 2006;25:941–952. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2006.09.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Eisenbarth SC, Colegio OR, O'Connor W, Sutterwala FS, Flavell RA. Crucial role for the Nalp3 inflammasome in the immunostimulatory properties of aluminium adjuvants. Nature. 2008;453:1122–1126. doi: 10.1038/nature06939. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Meng G, Zhang F, Fuss I, Kitani A, Strober W. A mutation in the Nlrp3 gene causing inflammasome hyperactivation potentiates Th17 cell-dominant immune responses. Immunity. 2009;30:860–874. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2009.04.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Gris D, Ye Z, Iocca HA, Wen H, Craven RR, Gris P, Huang M, Schneider M, Miller SD, Ting JP. NLRP3 plays a critical role in the development of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis by mediating Th1 and Th17 responses. Journal of immunology. 2010;185:974–981. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0904145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Mizumoto N, Kumamoto T, Robson SC, Sevigny J, Matsue H, Enjyoji K, Takashima A. CD39 is the dominant Langerhans cell- associated ecto-NTPDase: modulatory roles in inflammation and immune responsiveness. Nat Med. 2002;8:358–365. doi: 10.1038/nm0402-358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Melillo JA, Song L, Bhagat G, Blazquez AB, Plumlee CR, Lee C, Berin C, Reizis B, Schindler C. Dendritic cell (DC)-specific targeting reveals Stat3 as a negative regulator of DC function. Journal of immunology. 2010;184:2638–2645. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0902960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Moore KW, de Waal Malefyt R, Coffman RL, O'Garra A. Interleukin-10 and the interleukin-10 receptor. Annual review of immunology. 2001;19:683–765. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.19.1.683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Van Belle TL, Nierkens S, Arens R, von Herrath MG. Interleukin-21 receptor-mediated signals control autoreactive T cell infiltration in pancreatic islets. Immunity. 2012;36:1060–1072. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2012.04.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Baker BJ, Park KW, Qin H, Ma X, Benveniste EN. IL-27 inhibits OSM-mediated TNF-alpha and iNOS gene expression in microglia. Glia. 2010;58:1082–1093. doi: 10.1002/glia.20989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Farber K, Markworth S, Pannasch U, Nolte C, Prinz V, Kronenberg G, Gertz K, Endres M, Bechmann I, Enjyoji K, Robson SC, Kettenmann H. The ectonucleotidase cd39/ENTPDase1 modulates purinergic-mediated microglial migration. Glia. 2008;56:331–341. doi: 10.1002/glia.20606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Iyer SS, Ghaffari AA, Cheng G. Lipopolysaccharide-mediated IL-10 transcriptional regulation requires sequential induction of type I IFNs and IL-27 in macrophages. Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md : 1950) 2010;185:6599–6607. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1002041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Marteau F, Communi D, Boeynaems JM, Suarez Gonzalez N. Involvement of multiple P2Y receptors and signaling pathways in the action of adenine nucleotides diphosphates on human monocyte-derived dendritic cells. J Leukoc Biol. 2004;76:796–803. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0104032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Nihei OK, de Carvalho AC, Savino W, Alves LA. Pharmacologic properties of P(2Z)/P2X(7 )receptor characterized in murine dendritic cells: role on the induction of apoptosis. Blood. 2000;96:996–1005. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Do JS, Visperas A, Sanogo YO, Bechtel JJ, Dvorina N, Kim S, Jang E, Stohlman SA, Shen B, Fairchild RL, Baldwin WM, III, Vignali DA, Min B. An IL-27/Lag3 axis enhances Foxp3(+) regulatory T cell-suppressive function and therapeutic efficacy. Mucosal immunology. 2016;9:137–145. doi: 10.1038/mi.2015.45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Hall AO, Beiting DP, Tato C, John B, Oldenhove G, Lombana CG, Pritchard GH, Silver JS, Bouladoux N, Stumhofer JS, Harris TH, Grainger J, Wojno ED, Wagage S, Roos DS, Scott P, Turka LA, Cherry S, Reiner SL, Cua D, Belkaid Y, Elloso MM, Hunter CA. The cytokines interleukin 27 and interferon-gamma promote distinct Treg cell populations required to limit infection- induced pathology. Immunity. 2012;37:511–523. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2012.06.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Stumhofer JS, Laurence A, Wilson EH, Huang E, Tato CM, Johnson LM, Villarino AV, Huang Q, Yoshimura A, Sehy D, Saris CJ, O'Shea JJ, Hennighausen L, Ernst M, Hunter CA. Interleukin 27 negatively regulates the development of interleukin 17- producing T helper cells during chronic inflammation of the central nervous system. Nature immunology. 2006;7:937–945. doi: 10.1038/ni1376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Villegas-Mendez A, de Souza JB, Lavelle SW, Gwyer Findlay E, Shaw TN, vanRooijen N, Saris CJ, Hunter CA, Riley EM, Couper KN. IL-27 receptor signalling restricts the formation of pathogenic, terminally differentiated Th1 cells during malaria infection by repressing IL-12 dependent signals. PLoS pathogens. 2013;9:e1003293. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES