Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2017 Feb 21;7:42926. doi: 10.1038/srep42926

NMDA Receptor Expression in the Thalamus of the Stargazer Model of Absence Epilepsy

Z Barad 1,2, D R Grattan 1,3, B Leitch 1,2,a
PMCID: PMC5318904  PMID: 28220891

Abstract

In the stargazer mouse model of absence epilepsy, altered corticothalamic excitation of reticular thalamic nucleus (RTN) neurons has been suggested to contribute to abnormal synchronicity in the corticothalamic-thalamocortical circuit, leading to spike-wave discharges, the hallmark of absence seizures. AMPA receptor expression and function are decreased in stargazer RTN, due to a mutation of AMPAR auxiliary subunit stargazin. It is unresolved and debated, however, if decreased excitation of RTN is compatible with epileptogenesis. We tested the hypothesis that relative NMDAR expression may be increased in RTN and/or thalamic synapses in stargazers using Western blot on dissected thalamic nuclei and biochemically isolated synapses, as well as immunogold cytochemistry in RTN. Expression of main NMDAR subunits was variable in stargazer RTN and relay thalamus; however, mean expression values were not statistically significantly different compared to controls. Furthermore, no systematic changes in synaptic NMDAR levels could be detected in stargazer thalamus. In contrast, AMPAR subunits were markedly decreased in both nucleus-specific and synaptic preparations. Thus, defective AMPAR trafficking in stargazer thalamus does not appear to lead to a ubiquitous compensatory increase in total and synaptic NMDAR expression, suggesting that elevated NMDAR function is not mediated by changes in protein expression in stargazer mice.

Epilepsy is one of the most prevalent chronic neurological disorders, affecting approximately 65 million people worldwide1, one third of whom are unresponsive to currently available anti-epileptic medication2. Moreover, paediatric epilepsies are particularly common and can have a profound effect on the cognitive development and psychological wellbeing of affected children3. Absence seizures are non-convulsive, genetic, generalized seizures that appear in several forms of paediatric and adult epilepsies, with characteristic 3–4 Hz spike-and-wave discharges (SWDs) in EEG accompanied by unresponsiveness and brief loss of consciousness in patients. Children with absence seizures often experience adverse behavioural, psychiatric, and cognitive difficulties, such as attentional problems, anxiety, depression, and reductions in learning and memory4,5,6. This, combined with side effects associated with anti-absence drugs as well as the high rate of patients that don’t respond to available medication, warrant studies examining mechanisms underlying absence seizure generation and propagation. Several rodent models that display absence-like seizures facilitate the understanding of these underlying mechanisms.

Although activation of widespread brain areas can be detected during discharges7, SWDs primarily arise from abnormal corticothalamic hypersynchrony. While the precise initiation site of SWDs had been a matter of debate8, the currently prevailing cortical focus theory suggests that discharges are initiated in the cortex9,10. However, global, bilaterally generalized SWDs depend on an intact corticothalamic-thalamocortical (CT-TC) circuit, comprising interconnected cortical and thalamic areas11,12,13. Thalamic lesions, depending on the size and location, can either abolish or aggravate genetically determined SWDs in a rat absence model14. In particular, corticothalamic projections to the ventral posterior (VP) relay thalamus, reciprocal thalamocortical projections to the somatosensory cortex, and their collaterals to the parvalbumin (PV)-positive inhibitory neuron-containing reticular thalamic nucleus (RTN) delineate structures implicated to be involved in absence seizure generalization and maintenance8,15. Imbalance in excitatory/inhibitory synaptic transmission may predispose the circuit to altered synchrony, and ultimately SWDs. The RTN is a key circuit component, intermediate between the thalamic and cortical nodes, that exerts extensive inhibitory control on relay thalamic nuclei upon excitatory CT and TC input, and, therefore, critically determines the synchronicity of circuit oscillations. The cortical input to RTN appears to be of critical importance; in the Gria4−/− mouse model16, for instance, a decrease in AMPA receptor function at corticothalamic synapses on RTN neurons leads to SWDs. The loss of Gria4-containing AMPARs at corticothalamic (CT)-RTN synapses results in decreased feed-forward inhibition of relay thalamus, but reveals a new pathway for network hyperexcitability17, as the weakened inhibition of the relay nuclei via the CT-RTN-VP route in effect leads to increased direct excitation of VP neurons via corticothalamic projections. This work thus demonstrated that reduction in excitatory AMPA receptors can, paradoxically, result in hyperexcitatory oscillations by shifting the excitatory-inhibitory balance at the network level when the reduction in AMPARs is specific to CT-RTN synapses17.

The mouse strain stargazer shows 6–9 Hz SWDs, electrical activity that resembles human absence seizures, and is one of the widely used models for absence epilepsy18. The recessive mutation of the AMPA receptor auxiliary protein stargazin (or γ-2)18, causes impaired AMPA receptor trafficking19,20, and pharmacology21,22,23 in several brain regions in stargazers. Stargazin belongs to the family of transmembrane AMPA receptor proteins (TARPs)24, members of which may show complementary distribution in the CNS. Stargazin, however, is the predominant TARP in the RTN, and hence, AMPARs are dramatically reduced in stargazer RTN and particularly CT-RTN synapses25, also affecting AMPAR-mediated currents26. It had been proposed that the marked decrease in AMPAR expression and function at CT-RTN synapses could diminish the CT-RTN-VP feed-forward inhibition, leading to elevated direct CT-VP excitation and network hypersynchrony in stargazers, analogous to the Gria4−/− model25,26. Yet, functional evidence suggests that improperly trafficked AMPA receptors may remain at perisynaptic locations in stargazer RTN and contribute to altered AMPAR-mediated neurotransmission, which is reduced in amplitude but prolonged in duration27. Moreover, Lacey et al. reported a compensatory increase in NMDAR-mediated spontaneous and evoked excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs) when recording from stargazer RTN27. Overall, the net excitatory charge in stargazer RTN was comparable to controls attributable to the combined effect of the prolonged AMPAR component and augmented NMDAR-mediated currents. The findings also led the authors to argue that the increased NMDAR-mediated RTN excitability is responsible for circuit SWD generation.

The elevated NMDAR-currents could result from the concomitant increase in NMDAR activation in response to glutamate following decreased expression and function of synaptic AMPARs. Alternatively, as suggested, total or synaptic NMDAR expression may be upregulated in stargazer RTN27 through compensatory mechanisms. Notably, while the electrophysiological findings pointed to a potential elevation in NMDA receptor numbers in stargazers, they also showed the lack of change in receptor properties, i.e. receptor composition relative to controls27. Although NMDARs are not directly associated with stargazin or other members of the TARP family, there have been reports to show that NMDAR expression19 and function28 may be indirectly affected in stargazers. Specifically, NR1 subunit labelling was increased with post-embedding immunogold cytochemistry at stargazer cerebellar granule cell (GC) synapses that were devoid of the GluA2/3 subunits of AMPARs19. Thereby, we hypothesized that NMDAR protein expression may be elevated in the stargazer RTN or at thalamic synapses. The aim of this study was to test this hypothesis by quantifying NMDA receptor expression in the stargazer thalamus in comparison to control littermates. We used Western blot for comparative analysis of NMDAR subunits in dissected RTN and VP nuclei to determine if there are region specific changes in stargazers; furthermore, Western blot was used to examine AMPA- and NMDAR expression in biochemically isolated, pooled thalamic synapses in stargazers. Expression of the obligatory NR1 subunit was probed to test if total NMDAR expression is altered, and expression of NR2A and NR2B subunits to see if NR2A- and/or NR2B-containing subtypes are specifically altered. Lastly, in view of its pivotal role and specific impairment in stargazer mice, NMDAR total protein expression was further explored at CT-RTN synapses using post-embedding immunogold cytochemistry for comparative analysis of NR1 immunogold particles associated with single postsynaptic densities (PSD) of presumptive CT synapses in control and stargazer RTN single sections. Protein expression of AMPAR subunit GluA4 was analysed in parallel to demonstrate region specificity and reproducibility of previous findings in stargazers.

Results

Adult male mice (8–12 weeks) used in all experiments, derived from stargazer breeding colony, were routinely genotyped to verify the genetic background. Epileptic (E) stargazer mice (stg/stg) were processed parallel with control non-epileptic (NE: +/stg, +/+) littermates (Fig. 1).

Figure 1. Colony verification using genotyping for the stargazin gene.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Representative micrograph indicating the WT (360 bp) and mutant (155 bp) stargazin allele in non-epileptic (NE) control mice (+/stg, +/+) and epileptic (E) stargazer mice (stg/stg).

Total NMDAR protein expression is not elevated in RTN and VP of stargazers

We used Western blot to assess relative AMPA- and NMDAR protein expression in stargazer RTN (Fig. 2) and VP (Fig. 3). RTN somatosensory sectors were dissected from frozen coronal brain sections (Fig. 2a). In parallel, underlying VP nuclei were removed (Fig. 3a) for comparative analysis. Dissection was carried out with the help of anatomical landmarks. Regional specificity was subsequently validated using VGlut1 and GluA4 protein expression. We only analysed RTN samples with low VGlut1-high GluA4 protein expression, as opposed to medium/high VGlut1 and medium GluA4 expression typical of VP, in line with established data27,29,30,31. Interestingly, VGlut1 was downregulated in the epileptic VP, which corresponds with the decreased frequency of miniature excitatory postsynaptic currents (mEPSCs) in adult stargazer VP shown before26. GluA4 served not only as a regional marker, but also a positive control for stargazers, as total GluA4 protein expression was demonstrated to be reduced in both regions in these mice25. GluA4 was detected at 100 kDa, corresponding to the full GluA4 subunit. As expected, intensity of the GluA4-specific band was downregulated in both RTN (68% decrease, n = 8 NE control and n = 7 E stargazer mice; p < 0.0001, one sample t test), and VP (65% decrease, n = 8 NE control and n = 7 E stargazer; p < 0.0001, one sample t test) of stargazers in comparison to non-epileptic controls (Figs 2b and 3b). To compare total NMDAR expression in stargazers and controls, protein expression of the obligatory subunit NR1 was quantified using an antibody that recognizes all NR1 isoforms. The NR1-specific band was detected at 120 kDa. In contrast to GluA4, there was no statistically significant difference in NR1 mean expression between NE and E in either RTN (Fig. 2c) or VP (Fig. 3c) (n = 12 NE, n = 8 E for RTN and n = 11 NE, n = 9 E for VP; p > 0.05, one sample t test).

Figure 2. Western blot analysis of AMPA- and NMDA-type excitatory receptor subunits in the RTN.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

(a) Schematic diagram indicating the position of RTN on a coronal mouse brain slice. Modified from Allen Brain Atlas. (http://atlas.brain-map.org/#atlas=1&plate=100960236&structure=549&x=5280&y=3744.0000697544647&zoom=-3&resolution=11.97&z=6). Relative expression of AMPAR subunit GluA4 (b), and NMDAR subunits NR1 (c), NR2A (d), NR2B (e) in stargazer RTN; left panel: representative cropped WB images of protein of interest, as well as VGlut1, and β-actin in NE (non-epileptic) and E (epileptic) RTN, right panel: scatter-column combination chart depicting relative epileptic expression of GluA4 (n = 8 NE, n = 7 E; ****p ≤ 0.0001), NR1 (n = 12 NE, n = 8 E; p > 0.05), NR2A (n = 12 NE, n = 10 E; p > 0.05) and NR2B (n = 14 NE, n = 11 E; p > 0.05).

Figure 3. Western blot analysis of AMPA- and NMDA-type excitatory receptor subunits in the VP.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

(a) Schematic diagram indicating the position of VP on a coronal mouse brain slice. Modified from Allen Brain Atlas. (http://atlas.brain-map.org/#atlas=1&plate=100960236&structure=549&x=5280&y=3744.0000697544647&zoom=-3&resolution=11.97&z=6). Relative expression of AMPAR subunit GluA4 (b), and NMDAR subunits NR1 (c), NR2A (d), NR2B (e) in stargazer VP; left panel: representative cropped WB images of protein of interest, as well as VGlut1, and β-actin in NE (non-epileptic) and E (epileptic) RTN, right panel: scatter-column combination chart depicting relative epileptic expression of GluA4 (n = 8 NE, n = 7 E; ****p ≤ 0.0001), NR1 (n = 11 NE, n = 9 E; p > 0.05), NR2A (n = 12 NE, n = 10 E; p > 0.05) and NR2B (n = 13 NE, n = 12 E; p > 0.05).

NR2A- and NR2B-containing NMDAR subtypes are unaltered in stargazer RTN and VP

In addition to total NMDA receptor levels, reflected by NR1, expression of NR2A- or NR2B-containing subtypes was examined in the stargazer RTN or VP. In line with the literature, NR2A (Figs 2d and 3d) and NR2B (Figs 2e and 3e) were present in both regions and expression was greater in VP compared to RTN32,33. Mean expression of these subunits was not significantly altered in either region in epileptic stargazers relative to controls (NR2A: n = 12 NE, n = 10 E in RTN and n = 12 NE, n = 10 E in VP; NR2B: n = 14 NE, n = 11 E in RTN and n = 13 NE, n = 12 E in VP; all p > 0.05, one sample t test), based on intensity levels of the 180 kDa bands corresponding to full length NR2A and NR2B subunits, respectively. Heteroscedasticity was tested using Huber-White robust error analysis, which showed no evidence of unequal variability. No statistical difference between the mean protein expression values of all three NR subunits could be detected.

Decreased AMPAR protein expression at thalamic synapses is not accompanied by permanent upregulation of NMDARs

Although total NMDAR protein expression was not affected in the stargazer RTN, we hypothesised that impaired AMPAR trafficking may impact NMDAR membrane distribution, in particular synaptic NMDAR protein levels in stargazers relative to controls. Therefore, we sought to examine synaptic NMDAR protein expression in relation to AMPARs in stargazers and controls. To this end, biochemical plasma membrane fractionation of thalamic biopsy samples was utilized first. While the technique did not allow nucleus-specific probing of receptor distribution, we reasoned that it could reveal large-scale or ubiquitous changes compensatory to AMPAR reductions.

Tissue punches 1 mm in diameter containing both the RTN and VP regions were taken for this study (Fig. 4a), to achieve sufficient protein yield from biochemically isolated synaptic membranes for WB analysis. Following isolation of cell membranes, the differential solubility of membrane compartments in non-ionic detergents34,35,36 was utilised to separate non-ionic detergent insoluble synaptic and detergent soluble extrasynaptic fractions (Fig. 4b). The methodology was validated by enriched expression of Pan-Cadherin in both membrane fractions (extrasynaptic: TxS; synaptic: TxP), as well as the TxP fraction-specific enrichment of the bona fide PSD protein PSD95 (Fig. 4c). Expression of receptor proteins was normalized to Pan-Cadherin, as neuronal cadherin is not associated with TARPs24, and its expression was not affected in stargazers.

Figure 4. Biochemical fractionation and WB procedure.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

(a) Schematic diagram of a coronal mouse brain section indicating the region removed using biopsy punch pen. Modified from Allen Brain Atlas (http://atlas.brain-map.org/#atlas=1&plate=100960236&structure=549&x=5280&y=3744.0000697544647&zoom=3&resolution=11.97&z=5). (b) Flow chart to illustrate fractionation methodology. TxP = Triton X-100 insoluble synaptic fraction (pellet of last spin), TxS = Trinton X-100 soluble extrasynaptic membrane fraction (supernatant of last spin). (c) Representative WB composite images showing bands corresponding to markers, Pan-Cadherin and PSD-95 in different fractions. S1 = supernatant 1 - total lysate; S2 = supernatant 2 - cytosol; TxS = Triton X-100 soluble supernatant – extrasynaptic membrane; TxP = Triton X-100 insoluble pellet – synaptic membrane.

Our previous work demonstrated that AMPA receptors are dramatically reduced at specific synapses in RTN in stargazers, but the effect is less pronounced and not significant in VP synapses25. Hence, first synaptic AMPAR levels were quantified in the biochemically-isolated membrane fractions. GluA4 (Fig. 5a) and GluA2 subunits were greatly enriched in the synaptic fraction, while some AMPAR subunit protein expression was also detected in the extrasynaptic fraction (Fig. 5a). Relative GluA4 protein levels in stargazer preparations were altered to varying degrees. TxP-specific GluA4 expression was reduced by around 45% (p < 0.01 in four separate experiments; Fig. 5b), whereas extrasynaptic GluA4 levels were not significantly altered in stargazers compared to controls (Fig. 5c), resulting in significantly higher extrasynaptic to synaptic AMPAR expression ratio in epileptic stargazer mice compared to controls (Fig. 5c). TxP-specific GluA2 protein expression was similarly decreased by around 30% in stargazers (p < 0.05 in four separate experiments; Fig. 5b).

Figure 5. Relative synaptic and extrasynaptic GluA4, NR1, NR2A, and NR2B subunit levels in epileptic stargazer thalamus.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

(a) Representative composite images of cropped GluA4, NR1, NR2A, and NR2B immunoblots with markers Pan-Cadherin and PSD-95. (b) Scatter-column combination charts depicting the expression of GluA4 and GluA2, as well as NR1, NR2A, and NR2B subunits in the synaptic membrane fraction of E (epileptic, n = 4 from 4 litters) stargazer thalamus relative to NE (non-epileptic, n = 6 from 4 litters) controls after normalization to Pan-Cadherin (*p ≤ 0.05, ** ≤ 0.01). (c) Scatter-column combination charts depicting the expression of GluA4 and GluA2 subunits in the extrasynaptic membrane fraction of E (epileptic, n = 4 from 4 litters) stargazer thalamus relative to NE (non-epileptic, n = 6 from 4 litters) controls after normalization to Pan-Cadherin (p > 0.05). Scatter-column combination charts depicting extrasynaptic to synaptic GluA subunit ratios in NE controls and E stargazers (** ≤ 0.01, *p ≤ 0.05).

In contrast to AMPAR subunits, NR1, NR2A, and NR2B mean synaptic expression values showed no statistically significant difference in epileptic stargazer thalamic synapses, when compared to non-epileptic controls (Fig. 5a,b). In particular, expression of the compulsory subunit NR1, reflecting the total amount of functional NMDARs, was variable in epileptic synaptic fractions relative to controls, but statistical analysis showed no significant change (p > 0.05, three separate experiments, Fig. 5b). Similarly, no systemic changes in synaptic proportions of NR2A- and/or NR2B-subtypes could be detected in the epileptic thalamus. Mean epileptic expression values relative to non-epileptic expression were not significantly different based on one sample t test performed after normalization (p > 0.05 both NR2A, four separate experiments, and NR2B, six separate experiments, Fig. 5b). NR subunit proteins in the extrasynaptic fraction (TxS) were below detectable levels in the biochemical preparations, preventing systematic quantitative analysis of extrasynaptic NMDA receptor expression.

Loss of synaptic AMPAR-GluA4 expression does not result in increased total NMDAR protein expression at specific synapses in stargazer RTN

Findings of the fractionation experiments suggested that even a substantial loss of synaptic AMPARs is not ubiquitously associated with increased NMDAR levels. In order to evaluate synaptic NMDAR expression at the principal CT-RTN synapse further comparative post-embedding immunogold electron microscopy was undertaken in stargazer (E) and control (NE) mice. Ultrathin sections from Lowicryl HM-20-embedded RTN blocks were collected and immunolabelled for GluA4 and NR1 subunits (Figs 6a and 7a). Immunogold particles representing GluA4 and NR1 subunits within 30 nm of asymmetric single PSD profiles, characteristic of CT-RTN synapses, were quantified in single sections of NE-E littermate pairs. Gold particles were generally associated with membrane structures, and labelling was absent from mitochondria, nuclear structures, and blood vessels. Omission controls resulted in negligible labelling.

Figure 6. Postembedding immunogold cytochemistry of AMPAR subunit GluA4 in the RTN.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

(a) Sample electron micrographs from NE (non-epileptic) and E (epileptic) RTN sections illustrating GluA4-immunogold particles (15 nm gold, arrow and arrowhead) in NE and E sections. Synaptic targeting and/or anchorage of GluA4 is deficient in epileptic RTN, reflected by GluA4-immunogold particles associated with presumptive intracellular vesicles and/or extrasynaptic membrane, indicated by arrows on the representative E photomicrograph. In contrast, arrowheads indicate PSD-associated GluA4 particles. White asterisks: PSDs, a: presynaptic terminal. Scale bars: 200 nm for large field size, 100 nm for smaller field size images. (b) Stacked bars depicting the percentage of GluA4 labelled and unlabelled PSDs in NE and E RTN sections (n = 164 NE and n = 134 E PSDs). (c) Bar graphs showing the mean (±SEM) GluA4-gold particles of labelled PSDs in NE and E RTN (*p ≤ 0.05).

Figure 7. Postembedding immunogold cytochemistry of NMDAR subunit NR1 in the RTN.

Figure 7

Open in a new tab

(a) Sample electron micrographs from NE (non-epileptic) and E (epileptic) RTN sections illustrating NR1-immunogold (10 nm gold, arrowhead) particles in NE and E sections. White asterisks: PSDs, a: presynaptic terminal. Scale bars: 200 nm for large field size, 100 nm for smaller field size images. (b) Stacked bars depicting the percentage of NR1 labelled and unlabelled PSDs in NE and E RTN sections (n = 132 NE and n = 102 E PSDs). (c) Bar graphs showing the mean (±SEM) NR1-gold particles of labelled PSDs in NE and E RTN (p > 0.05).

Immunolabelling for AMPAR-GluA4 (Fig. 6a) confirmed previous findings reflective of AMPAR trafficking defects at the stargazer CT-RTN synapse, including a dramatic decrease in the percentage of GluA4-labelled PSDs (68.90% of a total of 164 PSDs in three NE mice, 28.36% of a total of 134 PSDs in three E mice; Fig. 6b), and significant reductions in the calculated mean number of gold particles per labelled PSDs (2.405 ± 0.1611 in NE, 1.684 ± 0.1416 in E; *p < 0.05; Fig. 6c) in stargazers compared to control littermates. In contrast, NR1 labelling at densities on ultrathin sections from the same RTN blocks was low, but comparable in stargazer and control mice (Fig. 7a). The percentage of labelled PSDs was similar in both groups (21.590% of a total of 132 PSDs from three NE mice, 19.610% of a total of 102 PSDs in three E mice; Fig. 7b), and the calculated mean number of gold particles per labelled PSDs was unchanged in stargazer RTN sections in comparison to controls (1.474 ± 0.1404 in NE, 1.400 ± 0.1338 in E; p > 0.05; Fig. 7c).

Discussion

Changes to excitatory neurotransmission at specific neuronal populations could render neural circuits prone to epileptiform discharges by resulting in excitatory/inhibitory imbalance. Recent studies indicated that NMDAR function is increased at cortical inhibitory interneurons37, and on RTN neurons27 in stargazer mice. Our results suggest, however, that the enhanced function in the stargazer RTN is not underpinned by a ubiquitous, permanent increase in NMDAR protein expression. Furthermore, the findings also indicate that the augmented currents are not likely to be driven by synapse-specific permanent increases in protein expression. No constitutive compensatory changes could be detected in NMDAR protein levels in spite of the dramatic reduction in tissue and synaptic GluA4 protein expression, suggesting that NMDAR subunit translation is not increased in stargazers. The lack of compensatory change at the CT-RTN synapse, in particular, could indicate that the impaired AMPAR-mediated corticothalamic excitation of stargazer RTN neurons is not reversed by NMDARs, ensuing feed-forward disinhibition of the relay thalamus in stargazers, in line with previous arguments25,26. Further research is needed to consolidate these findings, however, and to identify the cellular mechanisms underpinning the elevated NMDAR function in stargazers. Notably, the variability in protein expression could reflect posttranslational modification, or transient changes in synaptic NMDAR incorporation in stargazers, which could contribute to altered RTN neuron excitability. Furthermore, the variability may reflect dynamic changes in neuronal firing mode or electrical activity.

In general, heightened excitability of neural circuits is thought to underlie epileptiform activity. There is mounting evidence to suggest that, in addition to the direct enhanced excitation of principal neurons, decreased synaptic excitation and recruitment of inhibitory neurons could also lead to excitatory/inhibitory imbalance, due to the subsequent weakening of their inhibitory output, and this increased epileptic sensitivity can be rescued by optogenetic activation of inhibitory interneurons38,39,40,41. Consistent with this are findings from the Gria4−/− mouse absence model, where impaired AMPAR-mediated corticothalamic excitation of RTN neurons was associated with elevated direct corticothalamic excitation of relay neurons, presumably due to reduced CT-RTN-VP feed-forward inhibition17. Corresponding findings of diminished AMPAR function26 and expression, in particular at CT-RTN synapses25 and somatosensory PV+ inhibitory interneurons28, suggested the existence of identical circuit mechanisms in the stargazer absence model. Nonetheless, the role of RTN excitability in absence epilepsy circuit mechanisms is controversial as its inhibitory output to underlying relay nuclei is required for the activation of low-voltage-gated T-type calcium channels and the subsequent burst firing of relay neurons, which is thought to be a contributing factor to SWD maintenance15. Thus, it has been argued that decreased RTN excitability is incompatible with SWD activity, pinpointing the probability of compensatory changes in the stargazer RTN27.

NMDAR activity and expression have been studied in pathological CT-TC circuit oscillation in genetic42,43,44,45,46 and pharmacological47 absence models, although no clear association has been found between altered NMDAR expression and abnormal CT-TC synchronicity. In contrast, pharmacological studies investigating the effect of NMDAR antagonists or agonists on SWD parameters have revealed contradicting results, in part, perhaps, due to disease heterogeneity and mechanistic differences in different animal models. Importantly, NMDAR antagonist treatments in stargazers in vitro and in vivo have suggested a mechanistic increase in NMDAR function in the RTN27, and pronounced influence to baseline interictal gamma power in vivo37. Notably, however, NMDAR antagonists bath applied to different nodes of the CT-TC circuit of stargazers in vitro, resulted in disparate outcomes. The competitive and non-competitive NMDAR blockers CPP and MK-801 led to exacerbation of cortical discharges in stargazer cortical slices28, whereas application of the competitive antagonist APV to thalamic preparations from stargazers decreased thalamic oscillatory activity27. The effects of in vivo applied NMDAR antagonists on SWD activity in stargazers have also been ambiguous28,48, as one study demonstrated transient suppression of SWD activity upon the competitive antagonist CPP application, although this effect was superseded by a slight increase in SWD duration 20 min after injection48. In the same study, the non-competitive antagonist MK-801 led to decreased SWD duration, however, the authors noted the appearance of highly irregular EEG patterns following MK-801 injection48. In contrast, in a more recent study, MK-801 caused a marked increase in SWD duration 1 hour post-injection28, and also slowed the spike frequency from 6–9 Hz to 3–4 Hz28. This recent data suggest that NMDARs are indispensable for excitatory neurotransmission in the absence of AMPARs on inhibitory neurons in stargazers, and their blockade is likely to cause further reductions in inhibitory neuron excitability, and subsequent weakening of feed-forward inhibition of principal neurons, exacerbating SWDs28. Intriguingly, the baseline interictal relative gamma power was shown to be augmented in stargazers, which MK-801 was able to reverse, further indicating a profound role of NMDARs in the AMPAR-deficient stargazer PV+ cortical inhibitory interneurons37.

We hypothesised that the enhanced function in RTN is associated with increased protein expression levels. The role of NMDARs in the RTN is incompletely understood. Thorough electrophysiological characterization of NMDAR contribution at RTN synapses revealed a relatively weak NMDAR-component at corticothalamic (CT)-RTN49, but a more substantial contribution at thalamocortical (TC)-RTN synapses during regular synaptic transmission. In contrast, a recent study indicated a more significant NMDAR contribution at CT-RTN synapses relative to AMPARs50. Thalamic NMDARs were also shown to be required for the generation of thalamic spindle oscillations51. However, others demonstrated that the role of NMDARs in the CT-TC circuit is variable throughout postnatal development. NMDAR contribution is most prominent at early postnatal stages, but is less significant in the more developed circuit52,53. The developmental switch from NMDAR dominated ‘silent synapses’ to synapses predominated by AMPARs is maximal at corticothalamic and thalamocortical synapses of the RTN; while, strong contribution of NMDARs persists into adulthood in the VP thalamus53. Reports of dominant NMDAR function are also inconsistent with the expression data of ionotropic glutamate receptors in the RTN. AMPARs, particularly the GluA4 subunit, are prevalent in adult rodent RTN, especially compared to the VP29,30. Although the expression of NMDA receptors in rodent RTN has not been studied in as much detail, early work found that only about 30% of asymmetrical excitatory synapses in rat RTN immunolabelled with NMDAR154. Also, NMDAR subunits in macaque32 and human55 RTN are expressed at very low levels in comparison to other thalamic nuclei. Our results are congruent with these data and indicate much lower NMDAR expression in the mouse RTN compared to VP. Functional tetrameric NMDARs are formed by two obligatory NR1 subunits combined with either NR2 or NR3 subunits, from the possible four NR2 (2A-D) or two NR3 (3A-B) gene products56,57,58. Our examination focused on the NR2A- and NR2B-containing NMDAR subtypes, because, although NMDAR functional properties were unaltered, changes in NMDAR conductance were most enhanced at depolarized membrane potentials in the stargazer RTN27. Expression of these subtypes, as well as total levels were, however, unchanged in the stargazer RTN. It would be interesting to examine NR2C-NMDARs, a prevalent subtype in the RTN59,60. However, the electrophysiological findings did not indicate large-scale remodelling of NMDAR composition or a specific increase of the NR2C subtype in stargazers relative to controls27, and the expression of functional receptors would ultimately be limited by the compulsory NR1 subunit. Similarly, potential changes to the expression of individual NR1 splice variants61 may contribute to functional differences in the stargazer RTN, but this was not investigated in this study. The NR1-specific antibody used recognizes all splice variants and, hence, encompasses all NMDA receptors, reflecting the total protein expression levels.

Importantly, NMDAR membrane redistribution could effectively counteract the effects of decreased AMPAR trafficking and stability, despite the lack of changes in tissue NMDAR expression. Indeed, NR1 protein expression was for example elevated at GC synapses in the stargazer cerebellum19, but NR subunit protein levels were found unchanged in stargazer cerebellar tissue with Western blot62. Hence, we evaluated synaptic NMDAR levels in stargazer thalamus, and, in particular, sought to correlate this with synaptic AMPARs levels. Unlike AMPARs, however, NMDARs were unchanged in the stargazer membrane fraction, suggesting that deficient AMPAR trafficking and synaptic anchorage is not directly associated with a ubiquitous increase in synaptic NMDAR levels. Nonetheless, previous findings demonstrated an extensive AMPAR loss specifically at the CT-RTN synapse in stargazers25, and a compensatory upregulation of NMDAR expression limited to this synapse could be concealed by pooling heterogeneous synaptic populations of the RTN and VP. Post-embedding immunogold-cytochemistry confirmed the significant decrease in GluA4 subunit at CT-RTN synapses in stargazers, signified by fewer GluA4 labelled PSD profiles and lower calculated mean gold particle numbers per labelled PSDs. On the other hand, no change could be detected in NR1 labelling in epileptic RTN single sections relative to non-epileptic sections.

NMDARs are relatively mobile and activity-dependent lateral diffusion between membrane compartments occurs on a time-scale of seconds to minutes in cell cultures63,64. Therefore, it could be that alterations in synaptic NMDARs are more dynamic and temporally closely associated with SWD activity and, therefore, could not be detected by the techniques we have utilized. On the other hand, findings regarding NMDAR mobility emerged from studies using cell cultures and contradict results from acute brain slices. Harris and Pettit (2007) could not demonstrate high NMDAR mobility in acute brain slices, but rather proved the existence of stable synaptic and extrasynaptic receptor pools with no mobility between compartments65, making it debatable how mobile NMDARs are in vivo. Moreover, the high rate of discharge frequency and the prolonged nature of discharges in stargazers18 suggest that, statistically, large proportions of thalamic synapses would be ‘captured’ at time points temporally corresponding to seizures. Because NMDAR function is heterogeneous in the RTN49,66, it is also possible that changes are limited to a subset of synapses in stargazer RTN. Overall, our findings so far suggest the lack of ubiquitous changes at thalamic synapses, and, in particular, at the CT-RTN synapse, however, this remains to be further investigated. Functional NMDAR changes could be mediated by different cellular mechanisms, such as posttranslational modification. Of note, expression of the full-length NR2A subunit was more variable in epileptic stargazer samples, which could be caused by proteolytic cleavage. Induced truncation of NR2A subunits has been observed in focal cerebral ischemia67 and is thought to be a regulatory mechanism for NMDAR localization and function in disorders68.

Changes to extrasynaptic glutamate receptor expression in stargazers may be accountable for differences in excitatory neurotransmission27, such as prolonged AMPAR-mediated transmission. In fact, we found measurable AMPAR expression, particularly GluA4, in the extrasynaptic plasma membrane fraction. In contrast to increased perisynaptic GluA4 density shown by array tomography27, there was no statistically significant change in the amount of extrasynaptic GluA subunits in the epileptic stargazers relative to control extrasynaptic samples in this study. Nonetheless, this still entails elevated extrasynaptic to synaptic ratio for GluA4 subunits in the epileptic stargazers compared to controls. On the other hand, we were unable to quantify the expression of extrasynaptic NMDARs, and no apparent increase in the proportion of extrasynaptic NMDARs in the stargazer thalamus could be detected. Membrane-associated GluA4 and NR1 immunogold labelling was detectable away from distinct PSD profiles with post-embedding cytochemistry, however, the post-embedding immunolabelling was performed on single sections and synaptic profiles were not reconstructed using serial sectioning, thus, definitive categorization of these particles into membrane domains would be difficult69,70.

Altogether, enhanced NMDAR-mediated currents are unlikely to be mediated by increased translation or stability of NMDAR subunits. The findings also provide some evidence to suggest that synaptic NMDAR expression is unchanged in the stargazer RTN and VP, and at the CT-RTN synapse. Therefore, it remains unresolved if RTN neurons can be efficiently recruited via the corticothalamic input in the stargazer model. In light of the dramatic reduction in AMPAR expression and function, it continues to be highly likely that RTN neurons are hypoexcited upon CT input, but efficiently excited by TC projections. The ensuing diminished feed-forward inhibition of VP may lead to hyperexcited VP neurons, which can result in enhanced feedback inhibition onto VP neurons, following the thalamocortical recruitment of RTN neurons. The secondary changes observed in stargazers, in particular enhanced tonic inhibition71, and increased expression of GABAR subunits in VP72,73, are compatible with this model, as these may be compensatory mechanisms to overcome the weakened feed-forward inhibitory input.

Absence epilepsy is a heterogeneous disease, which is also reflected by the varied response of patients to available anti-epileptic drugs (AED). Since AEDs can lead to paradoxical, proepileptic response28,74 in some patients, it is critical to have a full understanding of cellular changes in the CT-TC circuit, as these undetected changes could underlie the proepileptic response to AEDs. Detailed understanding of anatomical and functional changes will also help develop patient-specific treatment strategies. Our results contribute to the elucidation of anatomical and molecular changes in the pathological CT-TC circuit.

Methods

Animals

All experiments were performed on adult (8–12 weeks) male stargazer (stg/stg) and control (+/stg, +/+) littermate mice. Mice were bred and housed at University of Otago Animal Facilities from breeding stock obtained from Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME, USA). To verify our colony genotyping for the stargazin gene was performed, using the following primers (Jackson Lab): TAC TTC ATC CGC CAT CCT TC forward; TGG CTT TCA CTG TCT GTT GC reverse for wild-type allele; GAG CAA GCA GGT TTC AGG C mutant allele reverse (Fig. 1). Western blot was performed to confirm the effect of the mutation at the protein level. All animal procedures were approved by the University of Otago Animal Welfare and Ethics Committee and were performed in accordance with University guidelines and regulations.

Brain microdissection

Adult male stargazer and control littermates were sacrificed by means of cervical dislocation, brains were carefully removed and snap frozen on dry ice. Frozen brains were sectioned in a freezing cryostat into 250 μm thick coronal sections, which were immediately thaw-mounted on glass slides, then re-frozen. Sections containing the reticular thalamic nucleus (RTN) and underlying ventral posterior (VP) relay nucleus were identified and the nuclei located based on anatomical landmarks. For the subsequent studies, RTN and VP were either harvested separately or pooled together. For the nucleus-specific microdissection75,76, 24 G blunted needles, with an inner diameter of 300 μm, were used to extract the somatosensory sectors of RTN (Fig. 2a) and VP (Fig. 3a), bilaterally. Sample purity was also assessed using markers in the subsequent Western blot analysis: VGlut1 (Synaptic Systems, 135 311) and GluA4 (Millipore, AB1508), which have higher expression levels in VP and RTN, respectively.

For the synapse-specific study, synaptic membrane fraction was biochemically isolated36 from tissue, collected with biopsy punch pens of 1 mm (Miltex), medial and adjacent to the internal capsule (Fig. 4a).

Western blot of RTN and VP

Micropunches of RTN and VP were homogenized by sonication in 50 mM Tris, 2 mM EDTA, 3% SDS, pH6.8 (supplemented freshly with PMSF and protease inhibitor cocktail Sigma, P8340) buffer. Sample protein concentration was quantified using DC Protein assay (Bio-Rad, 500–0116), and 15 μg protein per sample, denatured by β-mercaptoethanol was separated on SDS-PAGE gels. Separated proteins were transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes, which were then subjected to immunoblot analysis. Importantly, samples from non-epileptic (NE) and epileptic (E) littermates, as well as samples from RTN and VP from littermates were processed parallel, transferred on to the same membrane for comparative analysis. Expression of AMPAR subunit GluA4 (Millipore, AB1508) and NMDAR subunits NR1 (Millipore, MAB1586), NR2A (Millipore, AB1555P), and NR2B (Millipore, AB1557P) was probed by IR fluorescence immunoblot (Odyssey, LI-COR Biosciences) using previously characterised antibodies. Details and references regarding antibodies used in this study can be found on respective company websites. To allow the simultaneous probing of target AMPA- and NMDAR subunit proteins, and regional and loading controls, blots were cut horizontally. Membranes after transfer were washed in Tris-buffered saline (TBS), blocked in Odyssey Blocking Buffer (OBB) or Casein Blocking Buffer (LI-COR Biosciences) for 30–45 minutes at room temperature and incubated overnight with the antibodies above diluted in OBB diluted 2-fold with TBS-0.1%Tween. Following primary antibody incubation membranes were extensively washed with TBS-Tween before being incubated with IRDye-coupled anti-rabbit and anti-mouse secondary antibodies (LI-COR Biosciences) diluted 1:10000 in TBS-Tween for 1 hour at room temperature. Membranes were then washed in TBS-Tween and TBS before being scanned on Odyssey Classic imaging platform (LI-COR Biosciences). Image StudioTM was utilized for quantification by measuring integrated intensity values of bands corresponding to the respective receptor subunit molecules. All values were normalized against β-actin (Abcam, ab8226 or 8227). Expression in epileptic (E) mice is expressed in relation to NE (E/NE). Comparative analysis was performed on samples processed in parallel, and imaged using the same equipment and software settings.

Biochemical fractionation and Western blot of thalamic biopsy punches

Bilateral thalamic punches obtained from frozen coronal brain sections by biopsy punch pens of 1mm (Miltex) were homogenized in ice-cold fractionation buffer of 10 mM Tris, pH7.4 containing 1 mM EDTA and 320 mM sucrose, and supplemented fresh with PMSF and protease inhibitor cocktail (P8340, Sigma) by using sterile plastic pestles and pulses of ultrasound. To isolate synaptic membranes, a multistep centrifugation protocol was used as of Davies et al.36 (Fig. 4b). In brief, homogenates were first spun at 1000 g for 10 minutes to pellet debris and nuclei. The supernatant of the first spin was centrifuged at 10000 g for 15 mins, pelleting the cell membrane. This fraction was re-suspended in 0.5% Triton X-100-containing fractionation buffer and incubated on ice for 40 minutes before being spun at 32000 g for 20 minutes. This step enables the separation of the Triton X-100-insoluble synaptic membrane (pellet) from extrasynaptic membranes (supernatant). The pellet was re-suspended in 50 mM Tris, 2 mM EDTA, 3% SDS, pH6.8 buffer, while the supernatant was first concentrated by acetone, followed by centrifugation and re-suspension in the Tris/EDTA/SDS buffer for Western blot (WB). 10 μg protein of every fraction was subsequently processed by IR fluorescence WB in a series of experiments. WB methodology was as of above. Antibodies used, apart from listed ones above, were NR2B (610416, BD Transduction), GluA2 (Millipore, MAB397), Pan-Cadherin (4068, Cell Signaling Technology), PSD95 (Synaptic Systems, 124 011) and synaptophysin (Synaptic Systems, 101 004). Cadherin was used as internal loading control in subsequent data analysis due to the lack of direct association between cadherins and TARPs24.

Post-embedding immunogold cytochemistry – electron microscopy

Tissue processing and EM immunocytochemistry were performed following previously established methods25,73,77. Adult male stargazer and control mice from three separate litters were terminally anesthetized, and transcardially perfused with 4% paraformaldehyde-0.1% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M PB, pH7.4. Brains were further immersion fixed overnight at 4 °C, subsequently rinsed in 0.1 M PB and 250 μm thick coronal sections were cut on a vibratome (Vibratome® 1500, The Vibratome Company). Tissue blocks containing the internal capsule and RTN were trimmed and cryprotected through slow infiltration in sucrose solutions of increasing concentrations. Cryoprotected tissue was slam-frozen (Leica KF80, Leica Microsystems), freeze-substituted in methanol and embedded into Lowicryl HM-20 (14340, EMS) in a Leica automatic freeze-substitution system (AFS, Leica). Semi- and subsequently ultra-thin (70–80 nm) sections were cut and mounted on formvar-coated nickel grids for immunolabelling. Grids were incubated on droplets of primary antibody solutions diluted in 5 mM Tris – 0.7% NaCl, pH7.6 (AMPAR-GluA4 Millipore AB150825; NMDAR-NR1 BD Pharmingen 55630878), followed by incubation in goat anti-rabbit and goat anti-mouse IgGs coupled to 15 and 10 nm gold, respectively (EM.GAR15 and EM.GFAM10; BBI), diluted in 5 mM Tris – 0.7% NaCl, pH8.2. Primary antibody omission controls were included in each experiment. After light counterstaining with uranyl acetate and lead citrate grids were examined under Phillips CM100 transmission electron microscope (Phillips/FEI Corporation) fitted with MegaView III digital camera (Olympus Soft Imaging Solutions GmbH). Stargazer and control tissue were processed in parallel, and the experimenter was blinded to avoid bias. Images were analysed in Fiji (Fiji Is Just ImageJ) open source software. Gold particles that were within 30 nm from the midline of labelled PSDs were considered to represent synaptic expression and were counted to determine synaptic GluA4 and NR1 levels. The proportion of labelled versus unlabelled PSDs was determined. Individual PSD-associated gold particles for NE and E experimental groups were combined for statistical analysis38.

Analysis and figure preparation

Scatter plots combined with bars are used to display individual values as well as mean ± SEM. Statistical analysis was performed in Prism 6, using one sample t-test to probe statistical significance for relative E expression in WB experiments and unpaired two-sample t-test with Welch’s correction in EM immunogold experiments. Huber-White robust error analysis was performed in Stata to test inter-litter heteroscedasticity in NMDAR subunit expression in the regional and fractionation WB experiments. Composite Western blot images were prepared, using cropped images, in Photoshop CS6. Brightness and contrast were only adjusted slightly, and equally across blots, including control and epileptic samples. Figures were compiled in Photoshop CS6.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Barad, Z. et al. NMDA Receptor Expression in the Thalamus of the Stargazer Model of Absence Epilepsy. Sci. Rep. 7, 42926; doi: 10.1038/srep42926 (2017).

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank: the staff at North Taieri Animal Resource Facility for assistance; Rob Alumbaugh (Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Otago), Allan Mitchell, Gillian Grayston and Richard Easingwood (Otago Centre for Electron Microscopy) for technical advice; Andrew Gray (Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, University of Otago) for statistical advice; and acknowledge Drs Caroline Larsen and Rachael Augustine for help in optimizing the region-specific microdissection; and Dr HC Christian for advice on post-embedding immunocytochemistry. We acknowledge the University of Otago Doctoral Scholarship and Publishing Bursary awarded to Z.B. The work was supported by grants from the University of Otago Research Grants and Deans Bequest Fund awarded to B.L.

Footnotes

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Author Contributions Z.B. and B.L. conceived the study. Z.B. performed experiments. Each author contributed to study design, manuscript writing and editing.

References

  1. Focus on epilepsy. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 317–317 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Malkki H. Epilepsy-burning questions and emerging therapies. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 10, 243–243 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Wilmshurst J. M., Berg A. T., Lagae L., Newton C. R. & Cross J. H. The challenges and innovations for therapy in children with epilepsy. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 10, 249–260 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hughes J. R. Absence seizures: a review of recent reports with new concepts. Epilepsy & behav.: E&B 15, 404–412 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Guerrini R. et al. Dysgraphia as a Mild Expression of Dystonia in Children with Absence Epilepsy. PloS One 10, e0130883 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Tenney J. R. & Glauser T. A. The current state of absence epilepsy: can we have your attention? Epilepsy Curr. 13, 135–140 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gotman J. et al. Generalized epileptic discharges show thalamocortical activation and suspension of the default state of the brain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 15236–15240 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Avoli M. A brief history on the oscillating roles of thalamus and cortex in absence seizures. Epilepsia 53, 779–789 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Meeren H. K., Pijn J. P., Van Luijtelaar E. L., Coenen A. M. & Lopes da Silva F. H. Cortical focus drives widespread corticothalamic networks during spontaneous absence seizures in rats. J. Neurosci. 22, 1480–1495 (2002). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Polack P. O. et al. Deep layer somatosensory cortical neurons initiate spike-and-wave discharges in a genetic model of absence seizures. J. Neurosci. 27, 6590–6599 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Steriade M. & Contreras D. Spike-wave complexes and fast components of cortically generated seizures. I. Role of neocortex and thalamus. J. Neurophysiol. 80, 1439–1455 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Steriade M., Amzica F., Neckelmann D. & Timofeev I. Spike-wave complexes and fast components of cortically generated seizures. II. Extra- and intracellular patterns. J. Neurophysiol. 80, 1456–1479 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Luttjohann A. & van Luijtelaar G. Dynamics of networks during absence seizure’s on- and offset in rodents and man. Front. Physiol. 6, 16 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Meeren H. K., Veening J. G., Moderscheim T. A., Coenen A. M. & van Luijtelaar G. Thalamic lesions in a genetic rat model of absence epilepsy: dissociation between spike-wave discharges and sleep spindles. Exp. Neurol. 217, 25–37 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Maheshwari A. & Noebels J. L. Monogenic models of absence epilepsy: windows into the complex balance between inhibition and excitation in thalamocortical microcircuits. Prog. Brain Res. 213, 223–252 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Beyer B. et al. Absence seizures in C3H/HeJ and knockout mice caused by mutation of the AMPA receptor subunit Gria4. Hum. Mol. Gen. 17, 1738–1749 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Paz J. T. et al. A new mode of corticothalamic transmission revealed in the Gria4(−/−) model of absence epilepsy. Nat. Neurosci. 14, 1167–1173 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Noebels J. L., Qiao X., Bronson R. T., Spencer C. & Davisson M. T. Stargazer: a new neurological mutant on chromosome 15 in the mouse with prolonged cortical seizures. Epilepsy Res. 7, 129–135 (1990). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Chen L. et al. Stargazin regulates synaptic targeting of AMPA receptors by two distinct mechanisms. Nature 408, 936–943 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Milstein A. D., Zhou W., Karimzadegan S., Bredt D. S. & Nicoll R. A. TARP subtypes differentially and dose-dependently control synaptic AMPA receptor gating. Neuron 55, 905–918 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Priel A. et al. Stargazin reduces desensitization and slows deactivation of the AMPA-type glutamate receptors. J. Neurosci. 25, 2682–2686 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Turetsky D., Garringer E. & Patneau D. K. Stargazin modulates native AMPA receptor functional properties by two distinct mechanisms. J. Neurosci. 25, 7438–7448 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Tomita S., Shenoy A., Fukata Y., Nicoll R. A. & Bredt D. S. Stargazin interacts functionally with the AMPA receptor glutamate-binding module. Neuropharmacol. 52, 87–91 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Tomita S. et al. Functional studies and distribution define a family of transmembrane AMPA receptor regulatory proteins. J. Cell Biol. 161, 805–816 (2003). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Barad Z., Shevtsova O., Arbuthnott G. W. & Leitch B. Selective loss of AMPA receptors at corticothalamic synapses in the epileptic stargazer mouse. Neuroscience 217, 19–31 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Menuz K. & Nicoll R. A. Loss of inhibitory neuron AMPA receptors contributes to ataxia and epilepsy in stargazer mice. J. Neurosci. 28, 10599–10603 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Lacey C. J., Bryant A., Brill J. & Huguenard J. R. Enhanced NMDA receptor-dependent thalamic excitation and network oscillations in stargazer mice. J. Neurosci. 32, 11067–11081 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Maheshwari A., Nahm W. & Noebels J. Paradoxical proepileptic response to NMDA receptor blockade linked to cortical interneuron defect in stargazer mice. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 7, 156 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Mineff E. M. & Weinberg R. J. Differential synaptic distribution of AMPA receptor subunits in the ventral posterior and reticular thalamic nuclei of the rat. Neuroscience 101, 969–982 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Golshani P., Liu X. B. & Jones E. G. Differences in quantal amplitude reflect GluR4- subunit number at corticothalamic synapses on two populations of thalamic neurons. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 4172–4177 (2001). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Barroso-Chinea P. et al. Expression of the mRNAs encoding for the vesicular glutamate transporters 1 and 2 in the rat thalamus. J. Comp. Neurol. 501, 703–715 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Jones E. G., Tighilet B., Tran B. V. & Huntsman M. M. Nucleus- and cell-specific expression of NMDA and non-NMDA receptor subunits in monkey thalamus. J. Comp. Neurol. 397, 371–393 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Liu X. B., Murray K. D. & Jones E. G. Switching of NMDA receptor 2A and 2B subunits at thalamic and cortical synapses during early postnatal development. J. Neurosci. 24, 8885–8895 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Cohen C. M., Kalish D. I., Jacobson B. S. & Branton D. Membrane isolation on polylysine-coated beads. Plasma membrane from HeLa cells. J. Cell Biol. 75, 119–134 (1977). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Carlin R. K., Grab D. J., Cohen R. S. & Siekevitz P. Isolation and characterization of postsynaptic densities from various brain regions: enrichment of different types of postsynaptic densities. J. Cell Biol. 86, 831–845 (1980). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Davies K. D., Alvestad R. M., Coultrap S. J. & Browning M. D. alphaCaMKII autophosphorylation levels differ depending on subcellular localization. Brain Res. 1158, 39–49 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Maheshwari A., Marks R. L., Yu K. M. & Noebels J. L. Shift in interictal relative gamma power as a novel biomarker for drug response in two mouse models of absence epilepsy. Epilepsia 57, 79–88 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Pelkey K. A. et al. Pentraxins Coordinate Excitatory Synapse Maturation and Circuit Integration of Parvalbumin Interneurons. Neuron, 85(6), 1257–72 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Caputi A., Fuchs E. C., Allen K., Le Magueresse C. & Monyer H. Selective reduction of AMPA currents onto hippocampal interneurons impairs network oscillatory activity. PloS One 7, e37318 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Ledri M., Madsen M. G., Nikitidou L., Kirik D. & Kokaia M. Global optogenetic activation of inhibitory interneurons during epileptiform activity. J. Neurosci. 34, 3364–3377 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Krook-Magnuson E., Armstrong C., Oijala M. & Soltesz I. On-demand optogenetic control of spontaneous seizures in temporal lobe epilepsy. Nat. Commun. 4, 1376 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Peeters B. W., Van Rijn C. M., Van Luijtelaar E. L. & Coenen A. M. Antiepileptic and behavioural actions of MK-801 in an animal model of spontaneous absence epilepsy. Epilepsy Res. 3, 178–181 (1989). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Peeters B. W., van Rijn C. M., Vossen J. M. & Coenen A. M. Involvement of NMDA receptors in non-convulsive epilepsy in WAG/Rij rats. Life Sci. 47, 523–529 (1990). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Koerner C., Danober L., Boehrer A., Marescaux C. & Vergnes M. Thalamic NMDA transmission in a genetic model of absence epilepsy in rats. Epilepsy Res. 25, 11–19 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Nahm W. K. & Noebels J. L. Nonobligate role of early or sustained expression of immediate-early gene proteins c-fos, c-jun, and Zif/268 in hippocampal mossy fiber sprouting. J. Neurosci. 18, 9245–9255 (1998). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. van de Bovenkamp-Janssen M. C., van der Kloet J. C., van Luijtelaar G. & Roubos E. W. NMDA-NR1 and AMPA-GluR4 receptor subunit immunoreactivities in the absence epileptic WAG/Rij rat. Epilepsy Res. 69, 119–128 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Banerjee P. K. & Snead O. C. 3rd. Thalamic NMDA receptors in the gamma-hydroxybutyrate model of absence seizures: a cerebral microinjection study in rats. Neuropharmacol. 34, 43–53 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Aizawa M., Ito Y. & Fukuda H. Pharmacological profiles of generalized absence seizures in lethargic, stargazer and gamma-hydroxybutyrate-treated model mice. Neurosci. Res. 29, 17–25 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Gentet L. J. & Ulrich D. Electrophysiological characterization of synaptic connections between layer VI cortical cells and neurons of the nucleus reticularis thalami in juvenile rats. Eur. J. Neurosci. 19, 625–633 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Deleuze C. & Huguenard J. R. Two classes of excitatory synaptic responses in rat thalamic reticular neurons. J. Neurophysiol. 116(3), 995–1011 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Jacobsen R. B., Ulrich D. & Huguenard J. R. GABA(B) and NMDA receptors contribute to spindle-like oscillations in rat thalamus in vitro. J. Neurophysiol. 86, 1365–1375 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Golshani P., Warren R. A. & Jones E. G. Progression of change in NMDA, non-NMDA, and metabotropic glutamate receptor function at the developing corticothalamic synapse. J. Neurophysiol. 80, 143–154 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Golshani P. & Jones E. G. Synchronized paroxysmal activity in the developing thalamocortical network mediated by corticothalamic projections and “silent” synapses. J. Neurosci. 19, 2865–2875 (1999). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Liu X. B. Subcellular distribution of AMPA and NMDA receptor subunit immunoreactivity in ventral posterior and reticular nuclei of rat and cat thalamus. J. Comp. Neurol. 388, 587–602 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Clinton S. M. & Meador-Woodruff J. H. Abnormalities of the NMDA Receptor and Associated Intracellular Molecules in the Thalamus in Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology 29, 1353–1362 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Cull-Candy S. G. & Leszkiewicz D. N. Role of distinct NMDA receptor subtypes at central synapses. Sci. STKE 2004, re16 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Sanz-Clemente A., Nicoll R. A. & Roche K. W. Diversity in NMDA Receptor Composition: Many Regulators, Many Consequences. Neuroscientist. 19, 62–75 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Paoletti P., Bellone C. & Zhou Q. NMDA receptor subunit diversity: impact on receptor properties, synaptic plasticity and disease. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 14, 383–400 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Zhang Y., Buonanno A., Vertes R. P., Hoover W. B. & Lisman J. E. NR2C in the thalamic reticular nucleus; effects of the NR2C knockout. PloS One 7, e41908, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041908 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Ibrahim H. M. et al. Ionotropic glutamate receptor binding and subunit mRNA expression in thalamic nuclei in schizophrenia. Am. J. Psychiatry 157, 1811–1823 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Zukin R. S. & Bennett M. V. Alternatively spliced isoforms of the NMDARI receptor subunit. Trends Neurosci. 18, 306–313 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Yan D., Yamasaki M., Straub C., Watanabe M. & Tomita S. Homeostatic control of synaptic transmission by distinct glutamate receptors. Neuron 78, 687–699 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Tovar K. R. & Westbrook G. L. Mobile NMDA receptors at hippocampal synapses. Neuron 34, 255–264 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Groc L. et al. NMDA receptor surface mobility depends on NR2A-2B subunits. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 18769–18774 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Harris A. Z. & Pettit D. L. Extrasynaptic and synaptic NMDA receptors form stable and uniform pools in rat hippocampal slices. J. Physiol. 584, 509–519 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Gentet L. J. & Ulrich D. Strong, reliable and precise synaptic connections between thalamic relay cells and neurones of the nucleus reticularis in juvenile rats. J. Physiol. 546, 801–811 (2003). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Gascon S., Sobrado M., Roda J. M., Rodriguez-Pena A. & Diaz-Guerra M. Excitotoxicity and focal cerebral ischemia induce truncation of the NR2A and NR2B subunits of the NMDA receptor and cleavage of the scaffolding protein PSD-95. Mol. Psychiatry 13, 99–114 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Gladding C. M. & Raymond L. A. Mechanisms underlying NMDA receptor synaptic/extrasynaptic distribution and function. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 48, 308–320 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Petralia R. S. et al. Organization of NMDA receptors at extrasynaptic locations. Neuroscience 167, 68–87 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. McGuinness L. et al. Presynaptic NMDARs in the hippocampus facilitate transmitter release at theta frequency. Neuron 68, 1109–1127 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Cope D. W. et al. Enhanced tonic GABAA inhibition in typical absence epilepsy. Nat. Med. 15, 1392–1398 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Seo S. & Leitch B. Altered thalamic GABAA-receptor subunit expression in the stargazer mouse model of absence epilepsy. Epilepsia 55, 224–232 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Seo S. & Leitch B. Synaptic changes in GABA receptor expression in the thalamus of the stargazer mouse model of absence epilepsy. Neuroscience 306, 28–38 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Thomas P., Valton L. & Genton P. Absence and myoclonic status epilepticus precipitated by antiepileptic drugs in idiopathic generalized epilepsy. Brain 129, 1281–1292 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Palkovits M. Isolated removal of hypothalamic or other brain nuclei of the rat. Brain Res. 59, 449–450 (1973). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Augustine R. A., Kokay I. C., Andrews Z. B., Ladyman S. R. & Grattan D. R. Quantitation of prolactin receptor mRNA in the maternal rat brain during pregnancy and lactation. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 31, 221–232 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Shevtsova O. & Leitch B. Selective loss of AMPA receptor subunits at inhibitory neuron synapses in the cerebellum of the ataxic stargazer mouse. Brain Res. 1427, 54–64 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Piguel N. H. et al. Scribble1/AP2 complex coordinates NMDA receptor endocytic recycling. Cell Rep. 9, 712–727 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES