Skip to main content
PMC home page
The EMBO Journal logoLink to The EMBO Journal
. 2017 Jan 25;36(5):604–616. doi: 10.15252/embj.201696025

A G1‐like state allows HIV‐1 to bypass SAMHD1 restriction in macrophages

Petra Mlcochova 1, Katherine A Sutherland 1, Sarah A Watters 1, Cosetta Bertoli 2, Rob AM de Bruin 2, Jan Rehwinkel 3, Stuart J Neil 4, Gina M Lenzi 5, Baek Kim 5, Asim Khwaja 6, Matthew C Gage 7, Christiana Georgiou 7, Alexandra Chittka 7, Simon Yona 7, Mahdad Noursadeghi 1, Greg J Towers 1, Ravindra K Gupta 1,8,✉
PMCID: PMC5331754  PMID: 28122869

Abstract

An unresolved question is how HIV‐1 achieves efficient replication in terminally differentiated macrophages despite the restriction factor SAMHD1. We reveal inducible changes in expression of cell cycle‐associated proteins including MCM2 and cyclins A, E, D1/D3 in macrophages, without evidence for DNA synthesis or mitosis. These changes are induced by activation of the Raf/MEK/ERK kinase cascade, culminating in upregulation of CDK1 with subsequent SAMHD1 T592 phosphorylation and deactivation of its antiviral activity. HIV infection is limited to these G1‐like phase macrophages at the single‐cell level. Depletion of SAMHD1 in macrophages decouples the association between infection and expression of cell cycle‐associated proteins, with terminally differentiated macrophages becoming highly susceptible to HIV‐1. We observe both embryo‐derived and monocyte‐derived tissue‐resident macrophages in a G1‐like phase at frequencies approaching 20%, suggesting how macrophages sustain HIV‐1 replication in vivo. Finally, we reveal a SAMHD1‐dependent antiretroviral activity of histone deacetylase inhibitors acting via p53 activation. These data provide a basis for host‐directed therapeutic approaches aimed at limiting HIV‐1 burden in macrophages that may contribute to curative interventions.

Keywords: cell cycle, histone deacetylase, HIV, macrophage, SAMHD1

Subject Categories: Microbiology, Virology & Host Pathogen Interaction

Introduction

SAMHD1, a deoxynucleotide‐triphosphate (dNTP) hydrolase, restricts HIV‐1 reverse transcription (RT) through decreasing levels of dNTPs (Goldstone et al, 2011; Lahouassa et al, 2012; Schmidt et al, 2015). SAMHD1 phosphorylation at position T592 mediated by cyclin‐dependent kinases CDK1/2 (Cribier et al, 2013; White et al, 2013) in actively dividing cells impairs the dNTP hydrolase activity and allows viral DNA synthesis to occur (Cribier et al, 2013; Arnold et al, 2015). Some lentiviruses have evolved countermeasures against SAMHD1; for example, the HIV‐2/SIVsm lineage encodes the Vpx protein that degrades SAMHD1 and allows infection of otherwise SAMHD1‐positive target cells (Kaushik et al, 2009; Hrecka et al, 2011; Laguette et al, 2011). How pandemic HIV‐1 strains achieve efficient infection of terminally differentiated macrophages in vivo without a Vpx‐like activity has remained a significant unresolved question that has limited our understanding of HIV tropism and pathogenesis (Watters et al, 2013).

Here, we reveal dynamic expression of cell cycle‐associated proteins in non‐dividing macrophages that do not culminate in DNA synthesis or mitosis. These changes are dependent on the canonical mitogen/growth factor‐activated Raf/MEK/ERK signalling pathway and are sufficient to deactivate the potent HIV‐1 restriction mediated by SAMHD1. Moreover, we show in two distinct populations of tissue‐resident macrophages in mice that 20% of cells express a G1‐like activation profile, providing not only an explanation for the ability of macrophages to sustain high levels of HIV‐1 replication but also offering a therapeutic target for limiting HIV‐1 burden in these vital innate immune cells.

Results

Terminally differentiated macrophages stimulated to enter a G1‐like phase are highly susceptible to HIV‐1 infection

We observed that culture of human monocyte‐derived macrophages (MDM) in foetal calf serum/FCS (stimulated cells), as opposed to human serum/HS (unstimulated cells), led to a significant increase in permissivity to HIV‐1 infection (Figs 1A–C and EV1A–E). As expected, there was significant donor variation in absolute permissivity to HIV (Fig EV1B). An increase in viral permissivity under stimulating conditions was observed for single‐round VSV‐G‐pseudotyped HIV‐1 virus (Figs 1A and EV1A and B) and full‐length infectious HIV‐1 molecular clones (Figs 1B and C, and EV1C and D), including macrophage tropic viruses (BaL, YU‐2), clinical HIV‐1 isolates (Fig EV1C and D) and HIV‐1 with capsid mutations known to alter interactions with cyclophilin and CPSF6 leading to altered reverse transcription, retargeted integration and triggering of innate sensing (Fig EV1E). The infection enhancement was observed post‐entry at the step of reverse transcription (Figs 1B and EV1F). The effect of FCS on infection was lost when charcoal‐stripped FCS was used but not when boiled FCS or a human serum/foetal calf serum mixture (1:1) was used, suggesting the existence of a heat stable stimulatory factor in FCS rather than an inhibitory factor in HS (Fig EV1A).

Figure 1. Transitioning from G0‐ to a G1‐like phase in terminally differentiated monocyte‐derived macrophages (MDM).

Figure 1

Open in a new tab
  1. MDM were differentiated and cultured in RPMI complemented with MCSF and 10% human serum (unstim) or with MCSF and 10% foetal calf serum (stim). MDM were infected with VSV‐G‐pseudotyped HIV‐1 expressing GFP, and the percentage of infected cells was quantified 48 h post‐infection by FACS (n = 3, mean ± s.e.m.; **P‐value ≤ 0.01, unpaired t‐test).
  2. MDM were infected with HIV‐1 BaL and DNA isolated 18 h post‐infection for qPCR of late viral RT products (n = 3, mean ± s.e.m.; *P‐value ≤ 0.05, unpaired t‐test).
  3. Spreading infection in MDM. Cells were infected with HIV‐1 BaL, stained for intracellular p24 and quantified by FACS.
  4. Principal component analysis of expression data for macrophage‐associated transcripts to compare relative clustering of stimulated and unstimulated MDM and a range of primary cells/cell lines.
  5. Diagram of cellular and molecular functions associated with genes that show significant (−log2(P‐value) > 2) transcriptional upregulation in stimulated MDM compared to unstimulated MDM.
  6. Cell cycle‐associated transcripts in stimulated and unstimulated MDM.
  7. Immunoblot of cell cycle‐associated proteins expressed in MDM. Star indicates non‐specific band. This Western blot quantification is from Donor 1 in Fig 2A. The same blots were used in Fig 2A to allow comparison of different cell cycle‐associated proteins, as well as SAMHD1.
  8. Uninfected MDM or MDM exposed for 48 h to VSV‐G HIV‐1 GFP (HIV‐1 exposed) were stained for cell cycle‐associated proteins MCM2, Geminin and EdU incorporation (EdU added to MDM 50 h prior to analysis). On average, 104 cells in each experiment were recorded and analysed using Hermes WiScan cell‐imaging system and ImageJ. Diagram of the cell cycle pathway with associated markers is also shown.
  9. Cell cycle analysis by quantitation of DNA content by flow cytometry. Cycling THP‐1 cells and both unstimulated and stimulated MDM were labelled by propidium iodide (PI) and analysed by FACS.
  10. CFSE loaded MDM were cultured for 4 days to determine cell division/proliferation by FACS.

Source data are available online for this figure.

Figure EV1. Enhanced susceptibility to HIV‐1 infection in stimulated monocyte‐derived macrophages.

Figure EV1

Open in a new tab
  1. MDM were differentiated in RPMI complemented with MCSF and 10% human serum for 3 days and cultured for additional 3 days in RPMI complemented with 10% human serum (unstim), 10% foetal calf serum (stim), 10% charcoal‐stripped FCS (CS), 10% FCS boiled for 5 min and filtrated through 0.45‐μm filter (FCS boil), 1:1 mix of 10% HS and FCS (unstim:stim 1:1), 1:1 mix of 10% HS and FCS boiled for 5 min (unstim:FCS boil 1:1) and then infected with VSV‐G‐pseudotyped HIV‐1‐expressing GFP. The percentage of infected cells was detected 48 h post‐infection by FACS.
  2. MDM from 12 different donors (D1‐D12) were infected with VSV‐G‐pseudotyped HIV‐1 GFP; the percentage of infected cells was detected 48 h post‐infection by FACS.
  3. Single round of infection of MDM with a panel of full‐length HIV‐1 viruses (macrophage tropic viruses: BaL and YU2; clinical isolates: CH77, CH58, ZM247, WITO). Cells were stained for intracellular p24 protein 48 h post‐infection and numbers of infected cells quantified by light microscopy.
  4. The titres of released viruses were determined by infection of the indicator cells HeLa TZM‐bl. Culture supernatants from BaL‐infected MDM were harvest at day 2, 6 and 9 post‐infection, filtered and used to infect TZM‐bl cells. Luciferase activity of the TZM‐bl cells was measured 24 h post‐infection.
  5. MDM were infected with VSV‐G‐pseudotyped GFP viruses (wt HIV‐1; HIV‐1 capsid mutants P90A, N74D, G89V), and the percentage of infected cells was detected by FACS 48 h post‐infection. All viruses displayed similar percentage of infection (which was normalised to infection in stimulated macrophages ˜100%).
  6. MDM were infected with equal amounts of p24 (50 ng) of BlaM‐Vpr‐containing viruses for 4 h. Cells were loaded with CCF2/AM dye, and fusion events were detected by flow cytometry using BD LSR Fortessa and gated from 10,000 cells.
Data information: Graphs are average of n ≥ 3, mean ± s.e.m.; *P‐value ≤ 0.05; **P‐value ≤ 0.01; ***P‐value ≤ 0.001, unpaired t‐test.

The differential effects of FCS and HS suggested an approach to uncovering mechanisms regulating HIV‐1 permissivity in macrophages. We compared the transcriptomes of MDM differentiated in HS (unstimulated cells, UNSTIM) or FCS (stimulated cells, STIM) aiming to discover signalling pathways that contribute to higher HIV‐1 permissivity. Comparison of transcriptional profiles for a predefined gene signature that discriminates macrophages from other cell types (Tomlinson et al, 2012) clearly shows that HS and FCS cultured MDM cluster together and are distinct from closely related myeloid cells (Fig 1D). Moreover, they express similar macrophage markers (Fig EV2). However, use of ingenuity pathway analysis to evaluate genes associated with high permissivity to HIV‐1 infection revealed enrichment in a number of molecular/cellular functions including cell cycle regulation, growth and proliferation, and cell death or survival (Fig 1E). The top canonical pathway was enriched for genes encoding proteins involved in cell cycle regulation including cyclins (Figs 1F and EV3A, and Table EV1). These observations were validated at the protein expression level (Fig 1G). Stimulated cells showed an increase in D‐type cyclins D1 and D3, which accumulate as cells progress through G1 phase (Baldin et al, 1993; Sherr, 1993, 1996). Cyclin D2 was below detectable levels under both conditions (Fig 1G). We also observed an increase in cyclins A and E, E2F6 and Geminin—all known to accumulate during cell cycle entry (Coverley et al, 2002; Bertoli et al, 2013; Fragkos et al, 2015). Of note, CDK1—a key player in cell cycle progression—was also upregulated in stimulated cells, along with MCM2 (minichromosome maintenance complex component 2) (Fig 1G and H), a replication origin licensing factor that is expressed from G1 (but not in G0) (Baldin et al, 1993; Sherr, 1996; Su & O'Farrell, 1997; Tsuruga et al, 1997; Musahl et al, 1998; Stoeber et al, 1998, 2001; Williams et al, 1998). Importantly, p27 expression was reduced following MDM stimulation (Fig 1G). p27 is a cyclin‐dependent kinase inhibitor which is highly expressed in quiescent cells and which decreases after cell cycle re‐entry (Sherr & Roberts, 1999).

Figure EV2. Expression of macrophage cell surface markers is unaffected by stimulatory conditions.

Figure EV2

Open in a new tab
  • A, B
    Stimulated or unstimulated MDM were stained for classical macrophage markers (CD68, CD14) and M1 and M2 macrophage markers (CD163, CD80, CD86 and CD40) and analysed by FACS.

Figure EV3. MDM can be manipulated to transition between G0‐ and a G1‐like phase.

Figure EV3

Open in a new tab
  1. Ingenuity pathway interaction analysis of nuclear proteins that show significant transcriptional upregulation in stimulated MDM compared to unstimulated MDM. The figure demonstrates a single dominant cluster of interacting proteins.
  2. Example of acquisition by Hermes WiScan cell‐imaging system, an automated microscopic platform. MDM were labelled for nuclei, MCM2 and active DNA synthesis using Click‐iT® EdU Alexa Fluor® 488 Imaging Kit. Scale bars: 10 μm.
  3. MDM were treated for 2, 4 and 50 h with 10 μM EdU to detect active DNA synthesis using Click‐iT® EdU Alexa Fluor® 488 Imaging Kit. The percentage of EdU‐positive cells was quantified by FACS.
  4. Quantification of cell cycle phases from PI labelling.
  5. dNTP levels in stimulated and unstimulated MDM.
  6. MDM differentiated and cultured in RPMI complemented with MCSF and 10% human serum for 7 days were changed into stimulatory medium (10% FCS) and cultured for additional 3 days. Cells were infected with VSV‐G‐pseudotyped HIV‐1 GFP and the percentage of infected cells detected 48 h post‐infection by FACS.
  7. MDM were treated with the CDK4/6 inhibitor Palbociclib (1 μM) 18 h before infection and infected with VSV‐G‐pseudotyped GFP virus; VLP‐vpx was added at the time of infection. Cells from this experiment were lysed and used for immunoblotting.
Data information: Cells in each experiment were recorded and analysed using Hermes WiScan cell‐imaging system, ImageJ or FACS (n ≥ 3, mean ± s.e.m.).

We further compared stimulated and unstimulated cells at the single‐cell level for expression of cell cycle‐associated proteins, which are absent in G0/quiescent/terminally differentiated cells but (i) are found at all cell cycle phases (MCM2) (Masai et al, 2010), (ii) that accumulate in S and G2/M phases (Geminin) (Fragkos et al, 2015) and (iii) are specific to active DNA synthesis in cells and therefore a marker of S phase (EdU incorporation) (Fig 1H). Single cell‐imaging analysis using an automated microscopic platform (Fig EV3B) showed a specific increase in each marker in stimulated versus unstimulated cells. The absolute number of cells positive for MCM2 was fivefold to 10‐fold higher than cells positive for the S‐G2‐M marker Geminin (Fig 1H). Together with observed low levels of EdU incorporation over a 50‐h period, these data suggest that stimulated MDM re‐entered the cell cycle but the majority did not progress to S, G2/M phase (Figs 1H and EV3C). We confirmed further that stimulated MDM did not divide using classical propidium iodide (PI) and CFSE staining (Figs 1I and J, and EV3D). These data suggest that MDM are in a G0/quiescent/terminally differentiated state and that they are able to modulate expression of cell cycle‐associated proteins, without measurable cell division or DNA synthesis. These early changes are consistent with transition to a G1‐like phase and are associated with increased permissivity to HIV‐1 infection in cultured MDM.

Transition to a G1‐like state is sufficient to regulate SAMHD1 antiviral activity in terminally differentiated macrophages

Given the known association between SAMHD1, a well‐described HIV‐1 restriction factor in myeloid cells and the cell cycle (Cribier et al, 2013; White et al, 2013; Pauls et al, 2014; Yan et al, 2015), we hypothesised that SAMHD1 antiviral activity might be regulated spontaneously in human MDM. To test this, we examined CDK1/2 expression knowing that CDK1/2 phosphorylates SAMHD1 to deactivate its capacity to restrict infection (Cribier et al, 2013; Welbourn et al, 2013; White et al, 2013). We found raised expression levels of CDK1 and pSAMHD1‐T592 in stimulated MDM, but not CDK2, CDK4 or CDK6 (Fig 2A). dNTP levels were also increased by threefold to fourfold in stimulated MDM (Fig EV3E), also consistent with the reported activity of SAMHD1 (Lahouassa et al, 2012). Furthermore, exogenously induced degradation of SAMHD1 by co‐infection with SIVmac virus‐like particles bearing Vpx (VLP‐vpx) (Fig 2B), or depletion of SAMHD1 by siRNA transfection (Fig 2C) led to a 10‐fold increase in HIV‐1 infectivity specifically in unstimulated MDM, with no change in infection in the permissive stimulated MDM where SAMHD1 is phosphorylated and thus already inactive against HIV‐1.

Figure 2. Bidirectional transitions shape SAMHD1‐mediated restriction of HIV‐1.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab
  • A
    MDM from three donors (D1, D2, D3) were used for immunoblotting to detect SAMHD1 and CDK proteins. The blot for D1 is the same as that in Fig 1G in order to facilitate comparison of different cell cycle‐associated proteins and SAMHD1.
  • B
    MDM were co‐infected with VSV‐G HIV‐1 GFP and SIVmac virus‐like particles containing vpx (VLP‐vpx). Cells from a representative donor were used for immunoblotting. The percentage of infected cells was quantified by FACS 48 h post‐infection (n = 2, mean ± s.e.m.; **P‐value ≤ 0.01; (ns) non‐significant, unpaired t‐test).
  • C
    MDM were transfected with control or pool of SAMHD1 siRNAs and infected 3 days later with VSV‐G‐pseudotyped HIV‐1 GFP. Cells from a representative donor were used for immunoblotting. The percentage of infected cells was quantified by FACS 48 h post‐infection (n = 2, mean ± s.e.m.; **P‐value ≤ 0.01; (ns) non‐significant, unpaired t‐test).
  • D
    Experimental approach used to model MDM bidirectional G0–G1‐like transitions. MDM were as follows: (unstim) cultured in HS or (stim) cultured in FCS as described in Materials and Methods; [stim (day 3)] grown in HS conditions for 3 days and changed to stimulating FCS conditions for 3 days; [unstim (3 days)] grown in stimulating FCS condition for the 3 days and changed to non‐stimulating HS for the remaining 3 days.
  • E
    Single round of infection of MDM with full‐length HIV‐1 BaL. Cells were used for immunoblotting to detect CDKs, SAMHD1 and MCM2 proteins. Graph is a representative example of n ≥ 3, mean ± s.e.m.
  • F
    Proposed signalling pathway leading to SAMHD1 phosphorylation in stimulated MDM.
  • G, H
    Unstimulated (G) and stimulated (H) MDM were treated with inhibitors of RAF (2 μM), B‐RAF (3 μM), MEK1/2 (AS‐703026, 1 μM), JAK 1–3 (1 μM), GSK3 (2 μM), PIM 1–3 (3 μM) and CDK4/6 (1 μM) for 18 h before infection and infected with VSV‐G HIV‐1 GFP. The percentage of infected cells was quantified by FACS 48 h post‐infection. Graphs are representative example of n ≥ 3, mean ± s.e.m., *P‐value ≤ 0.05; **P‐value ≤ 0.01; calculated from triplicates, unpaired t‐test).
  • I
    MDM were treated with a MEK/ERK inhibitor (U0126, 10 μM) for 18 h before infection and where indicated VLP‐vpx was added at the time of infection. Percentage of infected cells were detected by FACS 48 h post‐infection. Cells were used for immunoblotting to detect CDKs, SAMHD1 and MCM2 proteins (n = 3, mean ± s.e.m.; (ns) non‐significant; ***P‐value ≤ 0.001, unpaired t‐test).

Source data are available online for this figure.

To probe the reversibility of regulation of CDK1/2 and SAMHD1 in MDM, we changed serum 3 days before infection from unstimulating HS to stimulating FCS, and vice versa (Fig 2D and E). Non‐stimulating conditions from day 3 onwards [unstim (day 3), Fig 2D and E] reduced MCM2 and CDK1 expressions (indicative of cells returning to a quiescent state), with decreased SAMHD1 phosphorylation and HIV‐1 infection. Conversely, stimulating conditions from day 3 [stim (day 3), Fig 2D and E] or from day 7 (Fig EV3F) augmented HIV‐1 infection and was associated with increased MCM2/CDK1 expression (indicative of cells re‐entering the G1‐like state) and SAMHD1 phosphorylation. No significant changes were observed for CDK2 expression or phosphorylation (Fig 2E). These data suggest that this process is reversible in terminally differentiated macrophages.

To further explore the regulation of SAMHD1 in MDM, we mapped the signalling pathway responsible for SAMHD1 phosphorylation by using well‐characterised specific inhibitors of kinases (Fig 2F–I). We identified the involvement of the Raf/MEK/ERK kinase cascade in the regulation of HIV restriction (Figs 2F–I and EV3G). Of note, the B‐Raf inhibitor PLX4032 (active only against the V600E B‐Raf mutant observed in cancer cells) was used as a negative control to demonstrate specificity of Raf inhibition (Fig 2G and H). To pharmacologically block the putative signal activated by FCS, we also used a highly specific inhibitor of MEK/ERK, U0126, reasoning that this would lead to suppression of HIV‐1 infection in a SAMHD1‐dependent manner (Fig 2F). Indeed, MEK/ERK inhibition substantially inhibited HIV‐1 infection of MDM, and loss of HIV‐1 permissivity correlated with SAMHD1 dephosphorylation, CDK1 and MCM2 downregulation (Fig 2I). Critically, SAMHD1 depletion by VLP‐vpx (Fig 2I) completely rescued HIV‐1 infection from the inhibitory effect of U0126. This was further confirmed by inhibiting the signalling pathway downstream from MEK/ERK using a specific inhibitor of CDK4/6 (Fig EV3G). These data illustrate, for the first time, that the Raf/MEK/ERK signalling pathway regulates SAMHD1 antiviral activity in terminally differentiated macrophages.

G1‐like phase macrophages are preferential targets for HIV at the single‐cell level

We next employed a high‐throughput single‐cell co‐localisation analysis, aiming to measure the association between SAMHD1, markers of cell cycle progression and HIV‐1 infection at the single‐cell level (Fig 3). We infected MDM with VSV‐G‐pseudotyped HIV‐1 and 48 h post‐infection stained the cells for MCM2 or for EdU incorporation (added at the time of infection) to monitor active DNA synthesis and analysed cells by using an automated microscopic system (Fig 3A–E). As expected, we found that MCM2 expression correlated with HIV infection under both stimulatory and non‐stimulatory conditions (Fig 3A–C and G–J). This analysis illustrated that macrophages in a G1‐like state, measured by MCM2 expression, are preferential targets for HIV at the single‐cell level. Stimulation by FCS simply increased the number of MCM2‐positive cells and therefore increased the number of permissive target cells for HIV‐1 infection (Fig 3B, C, E, G, and H). This explains the increased permissivity of stimulated MDM cultures in Fig 1A. Importantly, even though stimulatory conditions also increased the number of cells positive for EdU incorporation (Fig EV4A), the population of cells actively synthesising DNA was a minority (< 7%) and this increase was not statistically significant. As shown earlier, MDM very rarely divide, even under stimulatory conditions (Figs 1I and J, and EV3D). As HIV infection did not co‐localise with EdU incorporation in single‐cell analyses, we conclude that entry into S phase and DNA synthesis is not required for enhanced HIV‐1 infection (Figs 3C and J, and EV4B), consistent with a G1‐like permissivity window.

Figure 3. HIV‐1 tropism for G1‐like MDM at the cellular level.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab
  • A–C
    MDM were infected with VSV‐G‐pseudotyped HIV‐1 GFP, stained and recorded and analysed for infection, MCM2 expression and co‐localisation between infection and MCM2 protein and EdU incorporation 48 h post‐infection using Hermes WiScan cell‐imaging system. Random microscopic fields and plot profiles show an example of immunofluorescence intensity along infected cells. Scale bars: 20 μm.
  • D, E
    MDM were infected with VSV‐G‐pseudotyped HIV‐1 GFP in the presence of SIVmac virus‐like particles containing vpx (VLP‐vpx), stained and recorded 48 h post‐infection using Hermes WiScan cell‐imaging system. Random microscopic fields and plot profile show an example of immunofluorescence intensity along infected cells. Scale bars: 20 μm.
  • F
    MDM were infected with Semliki Forest virus (SFV). Random microscopic fields and plot profile show an example of immunofluorescence intensity along infected cells. Scale bar: 20 μm.
  • G–I
    MDM were infected with VSV‐G‐pseudotyped HIV‐1 GFP in the presence or absence of VLP‐vpx, stained and recorded 48 h post‐infection. On average, 104 cells in each experiment were recorded and analysed for infection (G), MCM2 expression (H) and co‐localisation between infection and MCM2 protein (I) using Hermes WiScan cell‐imaging system and ImageJ (n = 3, mean ± s.e.m.; (ns) non‐significant; **P‐value ≤ 0.01, ***P‐value ≤ 0.001, unpaired t‐test).
  • J
    Log odds ratios calculated from quantifications of stimulated MDM show association of infection with MCM2/EdU (1, high association; 0, no association) (n ≥ 3, mean ± s.e.m.). Immunoblot shows expressions levels of SAMHD1 in these experiments. EdU was added to cells at the time of infection.

Figure EV4. MDM in a G1‐like phase are highly permissive to HIV‐1 infection.

Figure EV4

Open in a new tab
  • A
    MDM were cultured in the presence of 5 μM EdU for 72 h and labelled using Click‐iT® EdU Alexa Fluor® 488 Imaging Kit. The percentage of EdU‐positive cells was detected by using Hermes WiScan and ImageJ.
  • B, C
    MDM were infected with VSV‐G‐pseudotyped HIV‐1 GFP or Semliki Forest virus (SFV) stained and recorded 48 h post‐infection and analysed for co‐localisation between infection and MCM2 protein or EdU incorporation (active DNA synthesis, EdU was added to cells at the time of infection). Co‐localisation analysis between infection and MCM2 in the presence or absence of SAMHD1 protein is also shown.
  • D
    MDM infection by SFV.
  • E
    Co‐localisation between SFV infection and MCM2 protein.
Data information: On average, 104 cells in each experiment were recorded and analysed using Hermes WiScan cell‐imaging system and ImageJ (n ≥ 3, mean ± s.e.m.; ***P‐value ≤ 0.001, unpaired t‐test).

Critically, degradation of SAMHD1, through co‐infection with SIVmac VLP‐vpx, or SAMHD1 depletion using RNAi, completely abrogated the association between infection of MDM and MCM2 expression (Figs 3D, E and G–J, and EV4C). Indeed, log odds ratios comparing frequencies of HIV‐1 infection in MCM2‐positive and MCM2‐negative cells were high, indicating highly specific infection of MCM2‐positive cells, but not MCM2‐negative cells. These log odds ratios were significantly reduced after SAMHD1 depletion indicating that SAMHD1 was responsible for the poor permissivity of the MCM2‐negative cells (Fig 3J). There was no such evidence for preferential permissivity of Edu‐positive cells (Fig 3J). Importantly, Semliki Forest virus (SFV), an alpha virus with an RNA genome which replication is dNTP‐independent, did not preferentially infect MDM expressing MCM2 (Figs 3F and J, and EV4D and E). As predicted, infection of MDM by lentiviruses naturally encoding Vpx genes (HIV‐2, SIVsmE543) also showed significant reduction in log odds ratios (Fig 3J).

Tissue‐resident macrophages commonly reside in a G1‐like phase and are preferential HIV‐1 targets

Human MDM are a widely used model for primary macrophages, but their generation relies on in vitro differentiation from monocytes. We therefore investigated whether tissue‐resident macrophages could be observed in the G1‐like state we describe and whether this was associated with increased HIV‐1 permissivity. SAMHD1 is conserved in mice and has anti‐HIV‐1 activity (Behrendt et al, 2013; Zhang et al, 2014) that, like human SAMHD1, is regulated by phosphorylation (Wittmann et al, 2015). We first isolated mouse microglia (tissue‐resident, yolk sac‐derived macrophages of the brain) and observed between 5 and 20% of these cells expressing MCM2 immediately following isolation (Fig EV5). However, MCM2 staining in microglia appeared to diminish rapidly following isolation from brain tissue, precluding analysis of the correlation between MCM2 and HIV‐1 infection. We therefore isolated tissue‐resident peritoneal macrophages (of bone marrow origin) (Fig 4) from both wild‐type (WT) and SAMHD1 knock‐out (KO) mice (Rehwinkel et al, 2013). We infected these cells with VSV‐G‐pseudotyped HIV‐1 and at 48 h post‐infection inspected the cells for specific macrophage markers F4/80 and CD11b (Fig 4A and B), as well as expression of MCM2 and EdU incorporation (Fig 4C–I). We observed that 20% of macrophages from both SAMHD1 WT and KO mice were positive for MCM2 (Fig 4C and H), but ≤ 1% of cells incorporated EdU. As before, this suggested a G1‐like state that does not progress into S phase similar to the situation in human MDM (Fig 4D and I). Critically, and as before, we observed preferential infection of MCM2‐positive cells from WT but not SAMHD1 negative cells (Fig 4E–G, J and K). There was no correlation between infection and EdU in macrophages from either WT or KO mice (Fig 4K).

Figure EV5. Microglia can be observed in a G1‐like phase.

Figure EV5

Open in a new tab
  • A, B
    Microglia isolated from 8‐ to 12‐week‐old CD1 mice were stained for the macrophage markers (A) F4/80 and (B) MCM2 4 h after isolation. Scale bars: 10 μm.
  • C
    Graph shows the percentage of MCM2‐positive cells from four independent experiments. On average, 2 × 103 cells in each experiment were recorded and analysed using Hermes WiScan cell‐imaging system and ImageJ (mean ± s.e.m.).

Figure 4. HIV‐1 tropism for murine tissue‐resident macrophages at the cellular level.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab
  • A–D
    Peritoneal macrophages from 6‐ to 10‐week‐old C57BL/6 mice were stained for the macrophage markers (A) F4/80, (B) CD11b, (C) MCM2 or (D) active DNA synthesis (EdU) 2 h after isolation. Scale bars: 20 μm.
  • E–K
    Peritoneal macrophages were isolated from 6‐ to 10‐week‐old WT or SAMHD1−/− (KO) mice. Cells were infected with VSV‐G‐pseudotyped HIV‐1 GFP for 48 h and analysed for (G) infection, (H) MCM2 expression, (I) EdU incorporation (EdU was added at the time of infection), and co‐localisation between infection and (J) MCM2 protein or (K) active DNA synthesis (by EdU incorporation). (E, F) Random microscopic fields and plot profiles show an example of immunofluorescence intensity along infected cells. Scale bars: 10 μm. On average, 104 cells in each experiment were recorded and analysed using Hermes WiScan cell‐imaging system and ImageJ (n ≥ 2, mean ± s.e.m.; (ns) non‐significant; **P‐value ≤ 0.01, unpaired t‐test).

HDAC inhibitors induce a SAMHD1‐dependent block to HIV‐1 in human MDM

Histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi) can reactivate latent HIV in a variety of experimental systems (Wightman et al, 2012). HDACi also induce cell cycle arrest and induce a differentiated phenotype and/or apoptosis in most carcinoma cell lines (Marks et al, 2000; Komatsu et al, 2006; West & Johnstone, 2014), but the effect of these drugs on HIV infection in primary human macrophages is not known. To test this, we treated MDM with increasing concentrations of HDACi SAHA (vorinostat) or panobinostat, infected the cells with VSV‐G‐pseudotyped HIV‐1 and measured the percentage of infected cells 48 h later. HDACi substantially inhibited HIV‐1 infection of both stimulated and unstimulated MDM (Figs 5A and EV6A) with no observed cytotoxicity (Fig 5B). For all further experiments, we used only stimulated MDM (Fig 5B–F), where the majority of cells are in a G1‐like phase and expressing MCM2 and inactive phosphorylated SAMHD1. Here, the loss of HIV‐1 permissivity following HDACi treatment correlated with loss of MCM2 (Fig 5C and D), CDK1 and SAMHD1 dephosphorylation, suggesting transition of MDM from G1‐phase to a non‐permissive, inactive state (Fig 5D). HDACi treatment of MDM was also associated with increased expression of cell cycle regulators p27 and p53 (Figs 5D and EV6B) (Sherr & Roberts, 1999; Wang et al, 2015). SAMHD1 depletion using siRNA (Fig 5E and F) or by VLP‐vpx (Fig EV6C–F) completely rescued HIV‐1 infection from the inhibitory effect of HDACi. These data indicate that HDACi possess antiretroviral activity that is SAMHD1‐dependent in macrophages.

Figure 5. HDAC inhibitors induce a SAMHD1‐dependent block to HIV‐1 infection in macrophages.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab
  • A
    MDM were treated with increasing concentrations of the HDAC inhibitor SAHA 18 h before infection with VSV‐G‐pseudotyped HIV‐1 GFP. The percentage of infected cells was measured using FACS 48 h post‐infection. Graph is representative example of n ≥ 3, mean ± s.e.m.
  • B
    Stimulated MDM were treated with 1 μM SAHA and 48 h later stained for viability using a cell viability assay (LIVE/DEAD) (n ≥ 2, mean ± s.e.m.; (ns) non‐significant, unpaired t‐test). H2O2 was used as a positive control to induce cell death.
  • C
    Stimulated MDM were treated with 1 μM SAHA, and MDM were recorded and analysed for MCM2 protein expression using Hermes WiScan (n = 3, mean ± s.e.m.; **P‐value ≤ 0.01, unpaired t‐test).
  • D
    Stimulated MDM were treated with 1 μM SAHA, MDM were lysed, and immunoblotting was performed to detect cell cycle‐associated proteins.
  • E, F
    MDM were transfected with control or pool of SAMHD1 siRNAs and infected 3 days later with VSV‐G‐pseudotyped HIV‐1 GFP. Cells from a representative donor were (E) lysed and used for immunoblotting or (F) inspected for infection. Scale bars: 20 μm. On average, 104 cells in each experiment were recorded and analysed using Hermes WiScan cell‐imaging system and ImageJ (n ≥ 2, mean ± s.e.m.).

Source data are available online for this figure.

Figure EV6. HDAC inhibitor blockade of HIV‐1 infection is SAMHD1‐dependent.

Figure EV6

Open in a new tab
  1. MDM were treated with panobinostat (PANO) 18 h before infection with VSV‐G‐pseudotyped HIV‐1 GFP. The percentage of infected cells was detected by FACS 48 h post‐infection.
  2. Quantification of specific protein band intensities from the immunoblot in Fig 5D using a CCD camera. Intensities of proteins bands were normalised to intensity of the actin protein band.
  3. MDM were treated with 1 μM SAHA (Vorinostat), and then recorded and analysed for infection (VSV‐G HIV‐GFP) using Hermes WiScan. Scale bars: 20 μm.
  4. MDM were treated with 1 μM SAHA (Vorinostat) and co‐infected with VSV‐G‐pseudotyped HIV‐1 GFP and VLP‐vpx. Cells from a representative donor were lysed and used for immunoblotting. The percentage of infected cells was detected by Hermes WiScan.
  5. MDM were treated with 0.025 μM panobinostat and then recorded and analysed for infection (VSV‐G HIV‐GFP) using Hermes WiScan. Scale bars: 20 μm.
  6. MDM were treated with 0.025 μM panobinostat and co‐infected with VSV‐G‐pseudotyped HIV‐1 GFP and VLP‐vpx. Cells from a representative donor were lysed and used for immunoblotting. The percentage of infected cells was detected by Hermes WiScan.
Data information: On average, 104 cells in each experiment were recorded and analysed using Hermes WiScan cell‐imaging system and ImageJ (n ≥ 3, mean ± s.e.m.). Source data are available online for this figure.

Discussion

HIV infects terminally differentiated tissue macrophages within the gut, lung, lymph nodes and central nervous system (CNS) (Gonzalez‐Scarano & Martin‐Garcia, 2005; Yukl et al, 2014; Cribbs et al, 2015). Macrophages represent the dominant cellular target in the CNS, and compartmentalised viral populations have been documented in CSF, consistent with T‐cell‐independent replication in this “sanctuary site” (Schnell et al, 2011). As HIV‐infected macrophages are able to release virus over extended periods, they are not only a potential source of drug‐resistant virus, but also a likely barrier to achieving remission/cure (Watters et al, 2013).

Here, we propose that SAMHD1 is the dominant host factor controlling post‐entry permissivity to infection of non‐dividing MDM. We demonstrate that the SAMHD1 phosphorylation status at T592 controlling antiviral activity is naturally dynamic in primary human MDM, providing a window of opportunity for HIV‐1 infection without a requirement for an anti‐SAMHD1 countermeasure. Intriguingly, the dynamic phosphorylation of SAMHD1 by CDK1 is associated with expression of proteins typically associated with cell cycle control. These include cyclins D1 and D3, cyclins A and E, E2F6, MCM2 and Geminin. Therefore, despite the fact that that the vast majority MDM in our experiments do not actually synthesise DNA (lack of EdU incorporation) or divide (by PI and CFSE assays), we find that MDM can be stimulated to exit G0 phase and enter a G1‐like state. This transition with associated CDK1 upregulation and T592 phosphorylation of SAMHD1 renders macrophages permissive to HIV‐1.

It is not clear why macrophages should transition between a classical G0 state and a G1‐like state. One possibility is that nucleotide accumulation is required for repair of damaged DNA, as has been observed in terminally differentiated post‐mitotic neurons (Kruman et al, 2004).

Our finding that microglia and peritoneal macrophages reside in the G1‐like state may explain how macrophages can sustain HIV‐1 infection in the absence of T cells within a humanised mouse model (Honeycutt et al, 2016). Importantly, we could recapitulate the G1‐like HIV‐1 permissivity window in freshly isolated peritoneal macrophages from mice. This demonstrates that the dynamic SAMHD1 regulation is conserved in mice and that in vivo macrophages are likely to experience the transitions we describe. We found that cells taken directly from mouse brain, in contrast to peritoneum, frequently reverted from G1‐like phase to the quiescent state. This suggests either that microglia are intrinsically programmed to more readily revert back to a quiescent state than peritoneal macrophages or that maintenance of the G1‐like state in microglia requires specific local tissue factors.

The brain is sometimes referred to as a “sanctuary” site where isolated primate lentiviral replication occurs in myeloid cells, including perivascular macrophages and microglia (Williams et al, 2001; Schnell et al, 2009, 2010; Micci et al, 2014). Our biological insights into dynamic changes essential for HIV‐1 infection in macrophages may be particularly relevant for HIV neuropathology given observations that symptomatic patients on long‐term fully suppressive combination antiretroviral therapy (ART) can have isolated viral replication in the CNS (Schnell et al, 2009, 2010; Canestri et al, 2010; Hammond et al, 2016). We speculate that the brain microenvironment could modulate G0‐ to G1‐like transitions in brain myeloid cells and thereby impact HIV replication in the CNS and HIV persistence in this compartment.

In the light of the above, induction of a state of cellular resistance to HIV infection by host‐directed therapy in addition to ART is highly desirable as we search to achieve sustained HIV remission. This may be particularly important if combination ART cannot prevent ongoing low‐level replication and evolution (Lorenzo‐Redondo et al, 2016). Here, we reveal a hitherto unrecognised SAMHD1‐dependent antiretroviral activity of HDACi in macrophages. In addition to their known effects on gene transcription (West & Johnstone, 2014) and HIV reactivation from latency through histone modification, HDACi activate SAMHD1 antiviral activity via p53‐induced cell cycle exit, CDK1 depletion and loss of SAMHD1 phosphorylation. The ability to reactivate latent virus and to prevent infection of new target cells is a major advantage of these agents as they enter clinical trials as candidates for achieving functional HIV cure.

We mapped activation of the Raf/MEK/ERK signalling cascade after addition of FCS. However, we have not identified the factor(s) leading to transition to the G1‐like phase and differential effects of FCS and HS on SAMHD1 activity in MDM. FCS and HS differ in a number of ways, including concentration of growth factors, hormones and endotoxin. Charcoal stripping but not boiling of FCS abrogated the enhanced permissivity arising from FCS culture, consistent with a hormone or fatty acid being the putative active agent. Furthermore, it is currently unclear whether the differential effect on SAMHD1 is due to differences between foetal and adult sera or differences between human and bovine sera. Indeed, we could not reproduce the effect of FCS using human cord blood‐derived serum (data not shown).

Recently, Badia et al reported that MDM cultured in the presence of GM‐CSF induced the expression of cyclin D2 with downstream changes in SAMHD1 phosphorylation and increased susceptibility to HIV‐1 infection (Badia et al, 2016). In particular, they were unable to detect cyclin D2 expression by Western blot in either HS or FCS cultured M‐CSF stimulated macrophages, despite differences in susceptibility to HIV‐1 and SAMHD1 phosphorylation. Concordantly, we report undetectable cyclin D2 under both culture conditions, consistent with a cyclin D2‐independent mechanism activated by FCS that is driven by the Raf/MEK/ERK signalling pathway and CDK1 regulation.

In summary, we have answered the question of how HIV‐1 infects SAMHD1 expressing macrophages without encoding a Vpx‐like SAMHD1 antagonist. We have found that MDM and tissue‐resident macrophages exist in their typical terminally differentiated/quiescent/G0 state, but also in a G1‐like state. Those in G0 can be stimulated into re‐entering the G1‐phase of the cell cycle, without evidence for cell division, accompanied by deactivation of SAMHD1 by phosphorylation. This allows efficient HIV‐1 replication without the need to degrade SAMHD1. SAMHD1 shutdown provides a window of opportunity for HIV‐1 infection, and we believe that this is how HIV‐1 can infect macrophages in vivo. The translational potential of this new knowledge is exemplified by our demonstration that HDAC inhibitors can block HIV infection at the pre‐integration stage through activation of SAMHD1, thereby protecting these critical immune cells.

Materials and Methods

Reagents, inhibitors, antibodies, plasmids

Tissue culture media and supplements were obtained from Invitrogen (Paisley, UK), and tissue culture plastic was purchased from TPP (Trasadingen, Switzerland). FCS (FBS) was purchased from Biosera (Boussens, France) and Sigma (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA). Charcoal‐stripped FCS was purchased from Sigma. Human serum from human male AB plasma was of USA origin and sterile‐filtered (Sigma). All chemicals were purchased from Sigma unless indicated otherwise. Kinase inhibitors used: CDK4/6 inhibitor (PD 0332991, Palbociclib) from Sigma; MEK/ERK inhibitor U0126 from Calbiochem (San Diego, USA); JAK 1–3 (ruxolitinib), PIM 1–3 (AZD1897), GSK3 (CT99021), and MEK1/2 (AS‐703026), RAF (TAK‐632), B‐RAF (PXL4032) from Selleckchem (Houston, TX, USA), SAHA (vorinostat) from Sigma and panobinostat from Cayman Chemicals (Ann Arbor, MI, USA). Antibodies used were as follows: anti‐cdc2 (Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA, USA); anti‐CDK2 (H‐298, Santa Cruz Biotechnology); anti‐pCDK2(Thr160) (Bioss Inc., MA, USA); anti‐CDK4 (DCS156, Cell Signaling Technology); anti‐CDK6 (B‐10, Santa Cruz Biotechnology); anti‐SAMHD1 (ab67820, Abcam, UK), beta‐actin (ab6276, abcam, UK); mouse anti‐MCM2 (BM‐28, BD Biosciences, UK); and rabbit anti‐MCM2 (SP85) from Sigma; pSAMHD1 (a kind gift from M. Benkirane) and ProSci (Poway, CA, USA); anti‐Geminin (NCL‐L‐Geminin, Leica); anti‐mouse F4/80 and CD11b (kind gift from S. Yona, UCL); anti‐human CD68, CD14, CD163, CD80, CD86, CD40 (kind gift from M. Noursadeghi). All infectious molecular clones were obtained from the NIH AIDS Research and Reference Reagent Program (Germantown, MD, USA).

Cell lines and viruses

TZM‐bl HeLa and 293T cells were cultured in DMEM complete (DMEM supplemented with 100 U/ml penicillin, 0.1 mg/ml streptomycin and 10% FCS). HIV‐1 full‐length virus stocks were generated by DNA plasmid transfection of 293T using Fugene HD (Promega UK Ltd, UK) according to the manufacture's protocol. Viral supernatants were harvest 48 h post‐transfection and filtered through 0.45‐μm pore‐size filters and stored at −80°C. Clarified viral supernatants were analysed by p24 ELISA (AIDS and Cancer Virus Program NCI‐Frederick, MD, USA) for HIV‐1 p24 antigen quantification. SIVmac virus‐like particles containing Vpx were prepared as previously described (Goujon et al, 2008). VSV‐G HIV‐1 GFP virus was produced by transfection of 293T with GFP‐encoding genome CSGW, packaging plasmid p8.91 and pMDG as previously described (Besnier et al, 2002). SFV was kind gift from M. Mazzon (UCL). VSV‐G HIV‐2 GFP virus was produced as previously described (Ylinen et al, 2005), and VSV‐G SIVsmE543 GFP virus was kind gift from G. Towers (UCL).

Monocyte isolation and differentiation

PBMC were prepared from HIV‐seronegative donors (after informed consent was obtained), by density‐gradient centrifugation (Lymphoprep, Axis‐Shield, UK). MDM were prepared by adherence with washing of non‐adherent cells after 2 h, with subsequent maintenance of adherent cells in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% human serum or 10% foetal calf serum and MCSF (10 ng/ml) for 3 days and then differentiated for a further 4 days in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% human/foetal calf sera without M‐CSF. Human AB serum (Sigma) was used to prepare unstimulated cells or FCS (Biosera or Sigma) to prepare stimulated cells.

Infection of primary cells using full‐length and VSV‐G‐pseudotyped HIV‐1 viruses

MDM were infected with 50 ng of p24 of each virus for 4 h. Cells were washed in PBS, and new complete medium was added. MDM were fixed in ice‐cold acetone–methanol (1:1 [vol/vol]) 2 days post‐infection, and infected cells identified by staining for p24 protein using a 1:1 mixture of the anti‐p24 monoclonal antibodies EVA365 and EVA366 (NIBSC, Center for AIDS Reagents, UK) and a secondary goat anti‐mouse beta‐galactosidase‐conjugated antibody (SouthernBiotech, AL, USA) and visualised by X‐Gal (5‐bromo‐4‐chloro‐3‐indolyl‐β‐d‐galactopyranoside) staining (Promega). Virus‐infected cells were detected by light microscopy. Alternatively, MDM were fixed in 3% PFA, permeabilised by saponin and stained for intracellular p24 using anti‐p24 FITC‐conjugated antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, USA). The percentage of infected cells was monitored by flow cytometry using BD FACSCalibur (BD Biosciences, UK) and analysed by CellQuest (BD Biosciences) and FlowJo software (Tree Star, OR, USA). GFP containing VSV‐G‐pseudotyped HIV‐1 was added to cells (MDM and tissue‐resident macrophages from mice), and after 4‐h incubation, removed and cells were washed in culture medium. The percentage of infected cells was determined 48 h post‐infection by flow cytometry using BD FACSCalibur (BD Biosciences, UK) and analysed by CellQuest (BD Biosciences) and FlowJo software (Tree Star, OR, USA) or by Hermes WiScan‐automated cell‐imaging system (IDEA Bio‐Medical Ltd. Rehovot, Israel) and analysed using MetaMorph and ImageJ software.

Quantitative PCR for total HIV DNA quantitation

Total HIV DNA was detected as previously described (Mlcochova et al, 2014).

Measurement of HIV‐1 entry (BlaM‐Vpr assay)

HIV‐1 entry was measured as previously described (Mlcochova et al, 2014).

TZM‐bl assay

Supernatants from BaL‐infected MDM were harvested, filtered using 0.45‐μm pore‐sized filters and used to infect TZM‐bl cells. Luciferase activity of the TZM‐bl cells was measured 24 h post‐infection using the Steady Glo Firefly Luciferase assay (Promega) and GloMax96 Luminometer (Promega).

SDS–PAGE and immunoblots

Cells were lysed in reducing Laemmli SDS sample buffer containing PhosSTOP (Phosphatase Inhibitor Cocktail Tablets, Roche, Switzerland) at 96°C for 10 min and the proteins separated on NuPAGE® Novex® 4–12% Bis–Tris Gels. Subsequently, the proteins were transferred onto PVDF membranes (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA), the membranes were quenched, and proteins detected using specific antibodies. Labelled protein bands were detected using Amersham ECL Prime Western Blotting Detection Reagent (GE Healthcare, USA) and Amersham Hyperfilm or AlphaInnotech CCD camera. Protein band intensities were recorded and quantified using AlphaInnotech CCD camera and AlphaView software (ProteinSimple, San Jose, CA, USA).

RNA microarrays

Total RNA was purified from cell lysates collected in RLT buffer (Qiagen) using the RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen). Samples were processed for Agilent microarrays, and data were normalised as previously described (Chain et al, 2010). Microarray data are available in the ArrayExpress database under accession number E‐MTAB‐2985 for stimulated MDM (differentiated in FCS) and E‐TABM‐1206 for all other cell types presented in this study. The macrophage‐associated gene expression module was used as previously described (Tomlinson et al, 2012), and genes encoding nuclear proteins were derived from the Gene Ontology consortium database (AmiGO v1.8, http://amigo1.geneontology.org/cgi-bin/amigo/go.cgi), under accession number GO:0005634, filtered for cellular compartment and for Homo sapiens, to give 6,164 unique genes with gene symbol annotations. Ingenuity pathway analysis (Ingenuity® Systems, www.ingenuity.com) was used to identify significantly enriched pathways among 170 genes with > twofold expression in stimulated and unstimulated MDM.

Cell proliferation assay, propidium iodine and CFSE labelling

Cell proliferation was measured by tracking new DNA synthesis using Click‐iT® EdU Alexa Fluor® 488 Kit (Invitrogen). EdU was added to culture medium at 5 μM for 2 h or 2–4 days depending on experiment. Labelled cells were detected using the Hermes WiScan‐automated cell‐imaging system (IDEA Bio‐Medical Ltd. Rehovot, Israel) and analysed using MetaMorph and ImageJ software. For propidium iodine (PI) staining: cells were fixed in 70% ethanol, treated with RNAse and stained with PI (0.1 mg/ml), monitored by flow cytometry using BD FACSCalibur and analysed by CellQuest and FlowJo software. 5 μM CFSE was added to MDM according to CellTrace™ CFSE Cell Proliferation Kit manufacturer protocol (ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA, USA), and cells were left in culture to show potential cell division for an additional 6 days. CFSE labelling was conducted according to CellTrace™ CFSE Cell Proliferation Kit manufacturer protocol. Cells were monitored by flow cytometry using BD FACSCalibur and analysed by CellQuest and FlowJo software.

Immunofluorescence

MDMs were fixed in 3% PFA, quenched with 50 mM NH4Cl and permeabilised with 0.1% Triton X‐100 in PBS or 90% methanol. After blocking in PBS/1% FCS, MDMs were labelled for 1 h with primary antibodies diluted in PBS/1% FCS, washed and labelled again with Alexa Fluor secondary antibodies for 1 h. Cells were washed in PBS/1% FCS and stained with DAPI in PBS for 20 min. Labelled cells were detected using Hermes WiScan‐automated cell‐imaging system (IDEA Bio‐Medical Ltd. Rehovot, Israel) and analysed using MetaMorph and ImageJ software.

SAMHD1 knock‐down by siRNA

1 × 105 MDM differentiated in MCSF for 4 days were transfected with 20 pmol of siRNA (L‐013950‐01, Dharmacon) using Lipofectamine RNAiMAX Transfection Reagent (Invitrogen). Transfection medium was replaced after 18 h with RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% human AB serum or 10% FCS and cells cultured for additional 3 days before infection.

Tissue‐resident brain macrophages

All work conformed to United Kingdom Home Office legislation (Scientific Procedures Act 1986) (https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/consolidated-version-of-aspa-1986). Adult CD1 mice aged 8–12 weeks were anaesthetised using 20% Pentoject® and perfused with ice‐cold PBS. Microglia were isolated as previously described (Denk et al, 2016). Briefly, brains were dissected and homogenised using dounce tissue homogeniser in 0.2% BSA supplemented Hank's balanced salt solution (HBSS). Microglia were isolated using a Percoll density gradient (37% versus 70%). Cells were subsequently counted using haemocytometer and plated in 96‐well plates at 2.5 × 104–5 × 104 cells/well. Cells were maintained in DMEM/F12 with 10% FCS at 37°C, 5% CO2 until further use.

Tissue‐resident peritoneal macrophages

Six‐ to ten‐week‐old C57BL/6 wild‐type and knock‐out mice were used in accordance with the UK Home Office Scientific Procedures Act 1986. Peritoneal cavities were washed with PBS supplemented with 3 mM EDTA. Following gentle massage, the cavity was opened by abdominal incision and lavage fluid collected. Fluid was centrifuged 500 g for 5 min, and cells were re‐suspended in DMEM + 10% FCS and cultured for 2 h before staining or infection.

dNTP measurement

The dNTP levels in the relevant cell types were measured by the HIV‐1 RT‐based dNTP assay as previously described (Diamond et al, 2004).

Ethics statement

Adult subjects provided written informed consent. Primary Macrophage & Dendritic Cell Cultures from Healthy Volunteer Blood Donors has been reviewed and granted ethical permission by the National Research Ethics Service through The Joint UCL/UCLH Committees on the Ethics of Human Research (Committee Alpha) 2 December 2009; reference number 06/Q0502/92.

Author contributions

PM, RKG, SY, GJT, MN, AC, AK, MCG, BK, SJN, AC, RAMB, JR designed experiments; RKG, PM, MN, GJT wrote the manuscript; PM, SAW, MCG, SY, GML, CG, KAS, CB performed experiments; and PM, RKG, SY, GJT, MN, AC, AK, MCG, BK, SJN, AC, CB, KAS, JR, RAMB analysed data.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supporting information

Expanded View Figures PDF

Click here for additional data file. (1.3MB, pdf)

Table EV1

Click here for additional data file. (38.4KB, zip)

Source Data for Expanded View

Click here for additional data file. (1.3MB, zip)

Review Process File

Click here for additional data file. (394.6KB, pdf)

Source Data for Figure 1

Click here for additional data file. (6MB, pdf)

Source Data for Figure 2

Click here for additional data file. (6.5MB, pdf)

Source Data for Figure 5

Click here for additional data file. (2.8MB, pdf)

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by a Wellcome Trust fellowship to RKG (WT108082AIA) and the National Institute for Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre. GJT is funded by Wellcome Trust Senior Biomedical Research Fellowship 108183, the European Research Council under the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007–2013)/ERC grant agreement number 339223 and the Medical Research Council. This work was also partially supported by USA National Institutes of Health grants, AI049781 (B.K.) and GM104198 (B.K.). We would also like to thank Mark Wainberg, Richard Goldstein, Anne Bridgeman, Jennifer Roe, Laura Hilditch, Deenan Pillay, Arne Akbar, Rob Sellar, Daniel Hochhauser and Clare Jolly for helpful advice and reagents.

The EMBO Journal (2017) 36: 604–616

References

  1. Arnold LH, Groom HC, Kunzelmann S, Schwefel D, Caswell SJ, Ordonez P, Mann MC, Rueschenbaum S, Goldstone DC, Pennell S, Howell SA, Stoye JP, Webb M, Taylor IA, Bishop KN (2015) Phospho‐dependent regulation of SAMHD1 oligomerisation couples catalysis and restriction. PLoS Pathog 11: e1005194 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Badia R, Pujantell M, Riveira‐Munoz E, Puig T, Torres‐Torronteras J, Marti R, Clotet B, Ampudia RM, Vives‐Pi M, Este JA, Ballana E (2016) The G1/S specific cyclin D2 is a regulator of HIV‐1 restriction in non‐proliferating cells. PLoS Pathog 12: e1005829 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Baldin V, Lukas J, Marcote MJ, Pagano M, Draetta G (1993) Cyclin D1 is a nuclear protein required for cell cycle progression in G1. Genes Dev 7: 812–821 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Behrendt R, Schumann T, Gerbaulet A, Nguyen LA, Schubert N, Alexopoulou D, Berka U, Lienenklaus S, Peschke K, Gibbert K, Wittmann S, Lindemann D, Weiss S, Dahl A, Naumann R, Dittmer U, Kim B, Mueller W, Gramberg T, Roers A (2013) Mouse SAMHD1 has antiretroviral activity and suppresses a spontaneous cell‐intrinsic antiviral response. Cell Rep 4: 689–696 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bertoli C, Skotheim JM, de Bruin RA (2013) Control of cell cycle transcription during G1 and S phases. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 14: 518–528 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Besnier C, Takeuchi Y, Towers G (2002) Restriction of lentivirus in monkeys. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 11920–11925 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Canestri A, Lescure FX, Jaureguiberry S, Moulignier A, Amiel C, Marcelin AG, Peytavin G, Tubiana R, Pialoux G, Katlama C (2010) Discordance between cerebral spinal fluid and plasma HIV replication in patients with neurological symptoms who are receiving suppressive antiretroviral therapy. Clin Infect Dis 50: 773–778 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chain B, Bowen H, Hammond J, Posch W, Rasaiyaah J, Tsang J, Noursadeghi M (2010) Error, reproducibility and sensitivity: a pipeline for data processing of Agilent oligonucleotide expression arrays. BMC Bioinformatics 11: 344 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Coverley D, Laman H, Laskey RA (2002) Distinct roles for cyclins E and A during DNA replication complex assembly and activation. Nat Cell Biol 4: 523–528 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cribbs SK, Lennox J, Caliendo AM, Brown LA, Guidot DM (2015) Healthy HIV‐1‐infected individuals on highly active antiretroviral therapy harbor HIV‐1 in their alveolar macrophages. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 31: 64–70 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Cribier A, Descours B, Valadao AL, Laguette N, Benkirane M (2013) Phosphorylation of SAMHD1 by cyclin A2/CDK1 regulates its restriction activity toward HIV‐1. Cell Rep 3: 1036–1043 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Denk F, Crow M, Didangelos A, Lopes DM, McMahon SB (2016) Persistent alterations in microglial enhancers in a model of chronic pain. Cell Rep 15: 1771–1781 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Diamond TL, Roshal M, Jamburuthugoda VK, Reynolds HM, Merriam AR, Lee KY, Balakrishnan M, Bambara RA, Planelles V, Dewhurst S, Kim B (2004) Macrophage tropism of HIV‐1 depends on efficient cellular dNTP utilization by reverse transcriptase. J Biol Chem 279: 51545–51553 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Fragkos M, Ganier O, Coulombe P, Mechali M (2015) DNA replication origin activation in space and time. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 16: 360–374 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Goldstone DC, Ennis‐Adeniran V, Hedden JJ, Groom HC, Rice GI, Christodoulou E, Walker PA, Kelly G, Haire LF, Yap MW, de Carvalho LP, Stoye JP, Crow YJ, Taylor IA, Webb M (2011) HIV‐1 restriction factor SAMHD1 is a deoxynucleoside triphosphate triphosphohydrolase. Nature 480: 379–382 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Gonzalez‐Scarano F, Martin‐Garcia J (2005) The neuropathogenesis of AIDS. Nat Rev Immunol 5: 69–81 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Goujon C, Arfi V, Pertel T, Luban J, Lienard J, Rigal D, Darlix JL, Cimarelli A (2008) Characterization of simian immunodeficiency virus SIVSM/human immunodeficiency virus type 2 Vpx function in human myeloid cells. J Virol 82: 12335–12345 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hammond ER, Crum RM, Treisman GJ, Mehta SH, Clifford DB, Ellis RJ, Gelman BB, Grant I, Letendre SL, Marra CM, Morgello S, Simpson DM, McArthur JC, Group C (2016) Persistent CSF but not plasma HIV RNA is associated with increased risk of new‐onset moderate‐to‐severe depressive symptoms; a prospective cohort study. J Neurovirol 22: 479–487 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Honeycutt JB, Wahl A, Baker C, Spagnuolo RA, Foster J, Zakharova O, Wietgrefe S, Caro‐Vegas C, Madden V, Sharpe G, Haase AT, Eron JJ, Garcia JV (2016) Macrophages sustain HIV replication in vivo independently of T cells. J Clin Invest 126: 1353–1366 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hrecka K, Hao C, Gierszewska M, Swanson SK, Kesik‐Brodacka M, Srivastava S, Florens L, Washburn MP, Skowronski J (2011) Vpx relieves inhibition of HIV‐1 infection of macrophages mediated by the SAMHD1 protein. Nature 474: 658–661 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kaushik R, Zhu X, Stranska R, Wu Y, Stevenson M (2009) A cellular restriction dictates the permissivity of nondividing monocytes/macrophages to lentivirus and gammaretrovirus infection. Cell Host Microbe 6: 68–80 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Komatsu N, Kawamata N, Takeuchi S, Yin D, Chien W, Miller CW, Koeffler HP (2006) SAHA, a HDAC inhibitor, has profound anti‐growth activity against non‐small cell lung cancer cells. Oncol Rep 15: 187–191 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kruman II, Wersto RP, Cardozo‐Pelaez F, Smilenov L, Chan SL, Chrest FJ, Emokpae R Jr, Gorospe M, Mattson MP (2004) Cell cycle activation linked to neuronal cell death initiated by DNA damage. Neuron 41: 549–561 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Laguette N, Sobhian B, Casartelli N, Ringeard M, Chable‐Bessia C, Segeral E, Yatim A, Emiliani S, Schwartz O, Benkirane M (2011) SAMHD1 is the dendritic‐ and myeloid‐cell‐specific HIV‐1 restriction factor counteracted by Vpx. Nature 474: 654–657 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lahouassa H, Daddacha W, Hofmann H, Ayinde D, Logue EC, Dragin L, Bloch N, Maudet C, Bertrand M, Gramberg T, Pancino G, Priet S, Canard B, Laguette N, Benkirane M, Transy C, Landau NR, Kim B, Margottin‐Goguet F (2012) SAMHD1 restricts the replication of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 by depleting the intracellular pool of deoxynucleoside triphosphates. Nat Immunol 13: 223–228 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Lorenzo‐Redondo R, Fryer HR, Bedford T, Kim EY, Archer J, Kosakovsky Pond SL, Chung YS, Penugonda S, Chipman JG, Fletcher CV, Schacker TW, Malim MH, Rambaut A, Haase AT, McLean AR, Wolinsky SM (2016) Persistent HIV‐1 replication maintains the tissue reservoir during therapy. Nature 530: 51–56 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Marks PA, Richon VM, Rifkind RA (2000) Histone deacetylase inhibitors: inducers of differentiation or apoptosis of transformed cells. J Natl Cancer Inst 92: 1210–1216 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Masai H, Matsumoto S, You Z, Yoshizawa‐Sugata N, Oda M (2010) Eukaryotic chromosome DNA replication: where, when, and how? Annu Rev Biochem 79: 89–130 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Micci L, Alvarez X, Iriele RI, Ortiz AM, Ryan ES, McGary CS, Deleage C, McAtee BB, He T, Apetrei C, Easley K, Pahwa S, Collman RG, Derdeyn CA, Davenport MP, Estes JD, Silvestri G, Lackner AA, Paiardini M (2014) CD4 depletion in SIV‐infected macaques results in macrophage and microglia infection with rapid turnover of infected cells. PLoS Pathog 10: e1004467 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Mlcochova P, Watters SA, Towers GJ, Noursadeghi M, Gupta RK (2014) Vpx complementation of ‘non‐macrophage tropic’ R5 viruses reveals robust entry of infectious HIV‐1 cores into macrophages. Retrovirology 11: 25 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Musahl C, Holthoff HP, Lesch R, Knippers R (1998) Stability of the replicative Mcm3 protein in proliferating and differentiating human cells. Exp Cell Res 241: 260–264 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Pauls E, Ruiz A, Badia R, Permanyer M, Gubern A, Riveira‐Munoz E, Torres‐Torronteras J, Alvarez M, Mothe B, Brander C, Crespo M, Menendez‐Arias L, Clotet B, Keppler OT, Marti R, Posas F, Ballana E, Este JA (2014) Cell cycle control and HIV‐1 susceptibility are linked by CDK6‐dependent CDK2 phosphorylation of SAMHD1 in myeloid and lymphoid cells. J Immunol 193: 1988–1997 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Rehwinkel J, Maelfait J, Bridgeman A, Rigby R, Hayward B, Liberatore RA, Bieniasz PD, Towers GJ, Moita LF, Crow YJ, Bonthron DT, Reis e Sousa C (2013) SAMHD1‐dependent retroviral control and escape in mice. EMBO J 32: 2454–2462 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Schmidt S, Schenkova K, Adam T, Erikson E, Lehmann‐Koch J, Sertel S, Verhasselt B, Fackler OT, Lasitschka F, Keppler OT (2015) SAMHD1's protein expression profile in humans. J Leukoc Biol 98: 5–14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Schnell G, Spudich S, Harrington P, Price RW, Swanstrom R (2009) Compartmentalized human immunodeficiency virus type 1 originates from long‐lived cells in some subjects with HIV‐1‐associated dementia. PLoS Pathog 5: e1000395 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Schnell G, Price RW, Swanstrom R, Spudich S (2010) Compartmentalization and clonal amplification of HIV‐1 variants in the cerebrospinal fluid during primary infection. J Virol 84: 2395–2407 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Schnell G, Joseph S, Spudich S, Price RW, Swanstrom R (2011) HIV‐1 replication in the central nervous system occurs in two distinct cell types. PLoS Pathog 7: e1002286 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Sherr CJ (1993) Mammalian G1 cyclins. Cell 73: 1059–1065 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Sherr CJ (1996) Cancer cell cycles. Science 274: 1672–1677 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Sherr CJ, Roberts JM (1999) CDK inhibitors: positive and negative regulators of G1‐phase progression. Genes Dev 13: 1501–1512 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Stoeber K, Mills AD, Kubota Y, Krude T, Romanowski P, Marheineke K, Laskey RA, Williams GH (1998) Cdc6 protein causes premature entry into S phase in a mammalian cell‐free system. EMBO J 17: 7219–7229 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Stoeber K, Tlsty TD, Happerfield L, Thomas GA, Romanov S, Bobrow L, Williams ED, Williams GH (2001) DNA replication licensing and human cell proliferation. J Cell Sci 114: 2027–2041 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Su TT, O'Farrell PH (1997) Chromosome association of minichromosome maintenance proteins in Drosophila mitotic cycles. J Cell Biol 139: 13–21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Tomlinson GS, Booth H, Petit SJ, Potton E, Towers GJ, Miller RF, Chain BM, Noursadeghi M (2012) Adherent human alveolar macrophages exhibit a transient pro‐inflammatory profile that confounds responses to innate immune stimulation. PLoS One 7: e40348 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Tsuruga H, Yabuta N, Hashizume K, Ikeda M, Endo Y, Nojima H (1997) Expression, nuclear localization and interactions of human MCM/P1 proteins. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 236: 118–125 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Wang X, Simpson ER, Brown KA (2015) p53: Protection against tumor growth beyond effects on cell cycle and apoptosis. Cancer Res 75: 5001–5007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Watters SA, Mlcochova P, Gupta RK (2013) Macrophages: the neglected barrier to eradication. Curr Opin Infect Dis 26: 561–566 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Welbourn S, Dutta SM, Semmes OJ, Strebel K (2013) Restriction of virus infection but not catalytic dNTPase activity is regulated by phosphorylation of SAMHD1. J Virol 87: 11516–11524 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. West AC, Johnstone RW (2014) New and emerging HDAC inhibitors for cancer treatment. J Clin Invest 124: 30–39 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. White TE, Brandariz‐Nunez A, Valle‐Casuso JC, Amie S, Nguyen LA, Kim B, Tuzova M, Diaz‐Griffero F (2013) The retroviral restriction ability of SAMHD1, but not its deoxynucleotide triphosphohydrolase activity, is regulated by phosphorylation. Cell Host Microbe 13: 441–451 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Wightman F, Ellenberg P, Churchill M, Lewin SR (2012) HDAC inhibitors in HIV. Immunol Cell Biol 90: 47–54 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Williams GH, Romanowski P, Morris L, Madine M, Mills AD, Stoeber K, Marr J, Laskey RA, Coleman N (1998) Improved cervical smear assessment using antibodies against proteins that regulate DNA replication. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95: 14932–14937 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Williams KC, Corey S, Westmoreland SV, Pauley D, Knight H, deBakker C, Alvarez X, Lackner AA (2001) Perivascular macrophages are the primary cell type productively infected by simian immunodeficiency virus in the brains of macaques: implications for the neuropathogenesis of AIDS. J Exp Med 193: 905–915 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Wittmann S, Behrendt R, Eissmann K, Volkmann B, Thomas D, Ebert T, Cribier A, Benkirane M, Hornung V, Bouzas NF, Gramberg T (2015) Phosphorylation of murine SAMHD1 regulates its antiretroviral activity. Retrovirology 12: 103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Yan J, Hao C, DeLucia M, Swanson S, Florens L, Washburn MP, Ahn J, Skowronski J (2015) Cyclin A2 ‐ CDK regulates SAMHD1 phosphohydrolase domain. J Biol Chem 290: 13279–13292 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Ylinen L, Keckesova Z, Wilson SJ, Ranasinghe S, Towers GJ (2005) Differential restriction of HIV‐2 and SIVmac by TRIM5alpha alleles. J Virol 79: 11580–11587 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Yukl SA, Sinclair E, Somsouk M, Hunt PW, Epling L, Killian M, Girling V, Li P, Havlir DV, Deeks SG, Wong JK, Hatano H (2014) A comparison of methods for measuring rectal HIV levels suggests that HIV DNA resides in cells other than CD4+ T cells, including myeloid cells. AIDS 28: 439–442 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Zhang R, Bloch N, Nguyen LA, Kim B, Landau NR (2014) SAMHD1 restricts HIV‐1 replication and regulates interferon production in mouse myeloid cells. PLoS One 9: e89558 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Expanded View Figures PDF

Click here for additional data file. (1.3MB, pdf)

Table EV1

Click here for additional data file. (38.4KB, zip)

Source Data for Expanded View

Click here for additional data file. (1.3MB, zip)

Review Process File

Click here for additional data file. (394.6KB, pdf)

Source Data for Figure 1

Click here for additional data file. (6MB, pdf)

Source Data for Figure 2

Click here for additional data file. (6.5MB, pdf)

Source Data for Figure 5

Click here for additional data file. (2.8MB, pdf)

Articles from The EMBO Journal are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES